This document provides the key data and trends from the Heritage at Risk programme

Transcription

1 Heritage at Risk - Key Statistics This document provides the key data and trends from the Heritage at Risk programme 1.Secular building or structure risk assessments (previously referred to as buildings at risk) [1] : trend data The baseline for building or structure risk assessments is 1999 Table 1: Building and structure risk assessment entries on the grade I and grade II* listed building entries on the structural scheduled monuments on the Total number of building and structure entries on the [1] , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , onward - adjusted to allow for practical comparison with previous years' figures

2 Table 2: Number and percentage of grade I and II* listed secular buildings on the New official statistic in 2013 for percentage of listed (secular) buildings on the based on revised methodology (excluding listed place of worship). grade I and grade II* listed buildings on the [2] grade I and II* listed buildings on the (%) onward - adjusted to allow for practical comparison with previous years' figures Table 3: Building or structure risk assessment entries (grade I and II* listed buildings and structural scheduled monuments) added to and removed from the annually building or structure risk assessment entries added to the building or structure risk assessment from the

3 Table 4: Building or structure risk assessment entries (grade I and II* listed buildings and structural scheduled monuments) removed from the baseline 1999 as their futures have been secured building or structure entries on the baseline 1999 building or structure entries removed from baseline as future secured Entries removed as future secured - as percentage of each region s baseline (%) Entries removed as future secured - as percentage of the national baseline (1,428) East Midlands East of England London North East North West South East South West West Midlands Yorkshire England 1, Table 5: building or structure risk assessment entries (grade I and II* listed building and structural scheduled monuments) that are economic to repair and capable of beneficial use building or structure risk assessment entries on the that are economic to repair (%) building or structure entries on the that are capable of beneficial use(%)

4 2. Listed Places of Worship Table 6: Number and percentage of listed places of worship on the is the new baseline for listed places of worship on the. listed places of worship listed places of worship on the * listed places of worship on the , , , , , *This statistic may include assessments of related structures included in the listing (ruins, presbyteries not used for worship) assessed using the BoS methodology. 3. All listed buildings Table 7: Number and percentage of all grade I and II* listed (secular and place of worship) buildings on the This is a new official statistic. all grade I and grade II* listed buildings on the all grade I and II* listed buildings on the

5 4. Scheduled Monuments: trend data Table 8: Scheduled monuments on the The baseline year for scheduled monuments (archaeology risk assessments) on the is 2009 scheduled monuments scheduled monuments on the scheduled monuments on the (%) ,719 3, ,731 3, ,748 3, ,759 3, ,792 3, ,833 3, ,850 2, ,848 2, ,855 2, ,852 2, Table 9: Archaeology risk assessments of scheduled monuments - from the 2009 baseline for positive archaeology risk assessment entries on 2009 baseline archaeology risk assessment from baseline 2009 for positive archaeology risk assessment entries removed from 2009 baseline for positive - as percentage of each regional baseline (%) archaeology risk assessment from the 2009 baseline for positive - as percentage of the national baseline (3,351) East Midlands East of England London North East North West South East South West 1, West Midlands Yorkshire England 3,351 1,

6 5. ed Parks and Gardens: trend data Table 10: ed parks and gardens on the The baseline for registered parks and gardens on the is 2009 registered parks and gardens registered parks and gardens on the registered parks and gardens on the (%) , , , , , , , , , , Table 11: Park and garden risk assessment from the 2009 baseline for positive park and garden entries on 2009 baseline park and garden entries removed from baseline 2009 for positive Parks and garden entries removed from the 2009 baseline for positive - as percentage of each region's baseline (%) Park and garden from the 2009 baseline for positive - as percentage of the national baseline (96) East Midlands East of England London North East North West South East South West West Midlands Yorkshire England

7 6. ed Battlefields: trend data Table 12: ed battlefields on the The baseline year for registered battlefields on the is 2008 registered battlefields registered battlefields on the registered battlefields on the (%) Table 13: Battlefield risk assessment from the 2008 baseline for positive battlefield battlefield entries from on 2008 baseline baseline 2008 for positive Battlefield from the 2008 baseline for positive - as percentage of each region's baseline (%) Battlefield entries removed from the 2008 baseline for positive - as percentage of the national baseline (8) East Midlands East of England London North East North West South East South West West Midlands Yorkshire England

8 7. Protected Wreck Sites: trend data Table 14: Protected wreck sites on the The baseline year for protected wreck sites on the is 2008 protected wreck sites protected wreck sites on the protected wreck sites on the (%) Table 15: Wreck site risk assessment from the 2008 baseline for positive wreck wreck site site entries on from 2008 baseline baseline 2008 for positive Wreck site from the 2008 baseline for positive - as percentage of each region's baseline (%) Wreck site entries removed from the 2008 baseline for positive - as percentage of the national baseline (10) East Midlands East of England London North East North West South East South West West Midlands Yorkshire England

9 8. Conservation Areas: trend data Table 16: Conservation areas on the The baseline for conservation areas on the is 2010 conservation areas surveyed conservation areas on the of those surveyed conservation areas on the (%)[3] , , , , , , , , * 6, *Change in methodology in 2018 resulted in removal of Conservation Areas historically put At Risk, but which confirmation had not been received from the LPA that year. These historic entries however will remain on the Heritage at Risk until confirmation of their removal Table 17: Conservation area risk assessment from the baseline (2010 ) for positive Number conservation conservation area areas on the from 2010 baseline (of those for positive surveyed) 2010 Conservation area entries removed from the 2010 baseline for positive - as percentage of each region's baseline (%) Conservation area from the 2010 baseline for positive - as percentage of the national baseline (549) East Midlands East of England London North East North West South East South West West Midlands Yorkshire England

10 9. Historic England grants to entries on the Heritage at Risk Table 18: Historic England grants (total spend) on entries on the Total Historic England grants to entries on the Financial year Amount spent entries Cumulative total spent 2013/ m m 2014/ m m 2015/ m m 2016/ m m 2017/ m m 10. Heritage at Risk overview for grade I and II* listed secular buildings on the 6.2 listed places of worship (all grades) on the 4.6 all listed building on the 12.2 scheduled monuments on the 5.9 registered parks and gardens on the 8.5 registered battlefields on the 7.5 protected wreck sites on the 5.8 conservation areas surveyed on the [1] Building or structure risk assessments include structural scheduled monuments [2] The percentage of listed secular buildings on the is for grade I and grade II* listed buildings and does not include structural scheduled monuments [3] The number of conservation areas surveyed is used to calculate the percentage on the. The 2018 figure is based on a response rate of 66.9% of local planning authorities

11 APPENDIX The following tables are provided to enable comparison with previous years' figures Table 19: Number and percentage of grade I and II* listed buildings on the. Percentage based on the buildings at risk (BAR) methodology superseded in 2013 (Provided to enable comparison with previous years' figures) grade I and grade II* listed building entries on the [2] grade I and II* listed building entries on the (%) , , , , , , , , onward - adjusted to allow for practical comparison with previous years' figures Table 20: English Heritage grant offered to building or structure entries on the (Data not provided after 2013/14) Total English Heritage grant offered to grade I and II* listed building and structural scheduled monuments on the from 1998/99 to 2013/14 Financial year year Amount offered building or structure entries Cumulative total offered 1998/ m Not available 5.1m 1999/ m Not available 11.7m 2000/ m m 2001/ m m 2002/ m m 2003/ m m 2004/ m m 2005/ m m

12 2006/ m m 2007/ m m 2008/ m m 2009/ m m 2010/ m m 2011/ m m 2012/ m m 2013/ m m Source: English Heritage