Data Link Operation and PBCS Implementation in Japan

Transcription

1 Ministry of Land Infrastructure Transport and Tourism CIVIL AVATION BUREAU OFJAPAN Data Link Operation and PBCS Implementation in Japan 17-19, June Paris. France Second PBCS Workshop Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism Natsuki IBE ANS Planning Division, Civil Aviation Bureau of Japan (JCAB)

2 Overview of Fukuoka Flight Information Region North America International Main Traffic flow of Fukuoka FIR North America Beijing, China Europe Republic of Korea Shanghai, China Middle East Hawaii Hong Kong, Taipei, Singapore Average 4,400 flight per day Over flight 700 flight Philippines Guam/Australia Data source Average of 2014

3 CARATS Collaborative Actions for Renovation of Air Traffic Systems History CARATS (Collaborative Actions for Renovation of Air Traffic Systems) is Japanese long-term vision in alignment with the GANP. CARATS was established in September Roadmap and Performance index were published in March Working Framework CARATS is managed by the Committee for Promoting Renovation of the Air Traffic Systems which consists of representatives from industry, academia and government including academic expert, research institute, airline, manufacturer, association concerned and JCAB. Some ad-hoc group were established under each WG for specific issues. (Data COM, TBO, GNSS, Surveillance) Achievement (as of March 2015.) 64 measures are described in CARATS and decision making year and implementation year are decided in each roadmap. Some measures are implemented. - RNP AR Approach Introduced airports : 16 airports Planned airports : 6 airports - Initial CDO Introduced airports : 2 airports Committee for Promoting Renovation of the Air Traffic System Planning and Coordination Meeting Cost-effectiveness analysis / performance assessment Subgroup Research and Development promoting Subgroup ATM WG PBN WG MET WG Information Management WG Some measures are prepared for the implementation. - RNAV5 routes in the low altitude airspace Trial operation started from 29 th May Continental CPDLC This will be introduced in Airspace Re-formation This will be introduced in 2020 *Detail information is shown in later slide.

4 Harmonization to the GANP Global Air Navigation Plan Overview GANP 4 th edition was approved in the 38 th ICAO Assembly. ASBU (Aviation System Block Upgrades) are included in the GANP. ICAO Asia Pacific Regional Office published Seamless ATM plan as a regional plan. Review of GANP JCAB reviewed each module in ASBUs and compared them with CARATS measures. * refer example below. The both have similar items, although some of the timing of implementation are not the same. The descriptions of some ASBU modules are conceptual. it is important to make the contents concrete for implementation. (Example of review) : Each measure included in the ASBU Block 0 (2013~2017) Block 1 (2018~2022) Block 2 (2023~2027) Block 3 (2028~) Surface Operations Safety and Efficiency of Surface Operations (A-SMGCS Level 1-2) Surface Movement Radar was already implemented. Improved surveillance operations for Decision making in 2016 Introduction in 2023 aerodrome operation (ADS-B(aerodrome)) Enhanced Safety and Efficiency of Surface Operations- SURF, SURF IA and Enhanced Vision Systems Decision making in 2014 Introduction in 2017 Improved surveillance operations for aerodrome operation (ATSA-SURF)) Optimized Surface Routing and Safety Benefits (A-SMGCS Level 3-4 and SVS) Decision making in 2014 Introduction in 2019 Sharing of trajectory information, weather information and constraints of aircraft operations Decision making in 2015 Introduction in 2021 Improvement of ATC capacity by using datalink (DCL, D-TAXI) Decision making in 2015 Introduction in 2024 Optimization of airport operations

5 Future Traffic Demand and Airspace Re-formation Future Traffic Demand Future Airspace Structure Traffic volume (thousand/ year ) 2,200 2,000 1,800 1,600 1,400 1,200 1, Actual Upper case Middle Lower Actual value Flying over 1,029 International Domestic 1,303 1, Predicted value 1,713 1,666 1,393 1,605 1,346 1,285 Reference 2,092 1,973 1,834 1,671 1,553 1, 実績値 Actual 上位ケース Upper case 中位ケース Medium 下位ケース Lower (FY) Future airspace improvement Operation Image (En-route) Future increasing demand Total re-formation of domestic airspace Contribution to the future ATM. 4

6 Future Plan -CARATS OI and EN for data link operation- Examples of OIs for data link operations 4

7 Oceanic Airspace(DARP, ADS-B ITP) Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism

8 Oceanic airspace -data link operation- Status of utilization of ADS-C, CPDLC and RNP4/10 JCAB introduced data link operations over the Pacific Oceanic airspace in FANS1/A (ADS-C and CPDLC) and RNP4/10 are applied. Average 480 flights per day. Almost 80% of the flights utilizes FANS1/A (*2012/10~2014/9) Non-data link RNP10 RNP4 5

9 IPACG Informal Pacific ATC Coordinating Group History IPACG (Informal Pacific ATC Coordinating Group) was established to provide a forum for air traffic service providers and airspace users to informally meet and explore solutions to near term ATC problems that limit capacity or efficiency within the Anchorage, Oakland, and Fukuoka Flight Information Regions (FIRs). 1 st meeting was held in Jul The meeting is held twice a year (including Providers Meeting). Achievements Fuel GAS reduction and CO2 greenhouse gas reduction Safety Introduced AIDC( ATS Interfacility Data Communication) Enhanced airspace capacity Longitudinal Separation Before April 2005 April 2005 ~ August 2008 ~ NM 15Minuets 50NM*1 *1 for RNP10 30NM*2 Lateral Separation Before April 1998 April 1998 ~ August 2008 ~ 100NM 50NM*1 Vertical Separation Before February 2000 February 2000 ~ FL290 or above 2000FT FL FT *1 for RNP10 FL FT FL410or below 1000FT 30NM*2 *2 for RNP4 *2 for RNP4 Introduced efficiency route system PACific Organized Track System (PACOTS) User Preferred Route (UPR) Dynamic Airborne Reroute Procedure (DARP) Since 1993 Since 2008 Since

10 Oceanic airspace Implementation of UPR DARP UPR operations started in 2008 DARP in 2011 (under the trial operations) Japan - Palau UPR Palau Fukuoka FIR Guam Japan - Australia UPR -UPR and DARP- Japan - New Zealand UPR 10 年 6 月 11 月 TRACK 1 UPR ペーパートライアル実施 11 年 6 月 30 日 Japan - North TRACK America1 UPR 実地トライアル開始予定 PACOTS 1/2/3/8, C/D/E/F Anchorage FIR Japan - Hawaii PACOTS North America - Hong Kong/Taiwan UPR 2011 DARP trial Japan - Hawaii UPR NARITA-PHNL/KLAX/KSFO Hawaii Oakland FIR 9 Japan - Australia ATS routes Brisbane FIR 10 年 7 月 日本 - 豪州 / ニュージーランド UPR 適用範囲拡大 UPR history over Pacific Ocean 2009 Japan -Australia UPR Japan - Hawaii UPR 2011 Hawaii - Japan UPR + DARP North America Hong Kong/Taiwan UPR (Trial) TRACK E/F UPR TRACK 1 UPR Hong Kong/Taiwan North America UPR 2012 TRACK 3 UPR 2013 Japan Palau /TRK F UPR 7

11 Oceanic airspace -CDP/ITP- OI-28 ADS-C CDP: Climb and Descend Procedure 10 Note: Separation to be applied for CDP will be determined after safety evaluation. Measure ID OI 28 Measure name Reduced separation minima for oceanic airspace OI-30-1 ADS-B ITP: In trail Procedure ADS C CDP 2026 以降 8

12 CRA Activities based on PBCS concept JCAB works as CRA for the evaluation of Oceanic ATC Data link operations. JCAB CRA has conducted the evaluation based on FOM until JCAB CRA started the new evaluation activities based on PBCS concept in April

13 DCL Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism 9

14 DCL (OI-29-1) DCL, D-TAXI and the other OIs for surface operations are listed in CARATS. DCL of HANEDA (RJTT) and NARITA (RJAA) is under trial operation from The trial will move to official operations in 21 st August

15 DCL Trial DCL Trial of RJTT & RJAA -Utilization ratio (Phase 2 & 3)- Mar-14 Apr-14 May-14 Jun-14 Jul-14 Aug-14 Sep-14 Oct-14 Nov-14 Dec-14 Jan-15 Feb-15 Number クリアランス発出数 of DCL issue 27,497 26,886 27,775 26,889 28,122 28,880 27,492 27,676 26,964 27,726 27,561 25,127 Total Number DCL 利 便数 of Departure 11,049 10,910 11,380 11,199 11,590 13,029 14,592 15,101 14,859 15,451 15,458 14,342 DCL DCL Utilization 利 率 ratio 40.18% 40.58% 40.97% 41.65% 41.21% 45.11% 53.08% 54.56% 55.11% 55.73% 56.09% 57.08% Number クリアランス発出数 of DCL issue 17,259 17,628 18,236 17,602 18,256 18,551 17,822 18,045 17,841 18,264 18,184 16,494 RJTT Number DCL 利 便数 of Departure 7,958 8,297 8,731 8,528 8,887 9,368 9,727 10,134 10,217 10,568 10,494 9,652 DCL DCL Utilization 利 率 ratio 46.11% 47.07% 47.88% 48.45% 48.68% 50.50% 54.58% 56.16% 57.27% 57.86% 57.71% 58.52% Number クリアランス発出数 of DCL issue 10,238 9,258 9,539 9,287 9,866 10,329 9,670 9,631 9,123 9,462 9,377 8,633 RJAA Number DCL 利 便数 of Departure 3,091 2,613 2,649 2,671 2,703 3,661 4,865 4,967 4,642 4,883 4,964 4,690 DCL DCL Utilization 利 率 ratio 30.19% 28.22% 27.77% 28.76% 27.40% 35.44% 50.31% 51.57% 50.88% 51.61% 52.94% 54.33% 12,000 10,000 8,000 6,000 4,000 2,000 0 Number RJTT 利 便数 of DCL issue RJAA Number 利 便数 of DCL issue Utilization 利 率 ratio RJTT Utilization 利 率 ratio RJAA Utilization 利 率 ratio (RJTT) Phase-II (RJAA) Mar 14 Apr 14 May 14 Jun 14 Jul 14 Aug 14 Sep 14 Oct 14 Nov 14 Dec 14 Jan 15 Feb 15 (ALL) (RJTT) Phase-III (RJAA) 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% RJTT: Tokyo International Airport (HANEDA) RJAA : Narita International Airport (NARITA) 11

16 DCL Trial DCL Trial of RJTT & RJAA -Success rate (Phase 2 & 3)- Mar-14 Apr-14 May-14 Jun-14 Jul-14 Aug-14 Sep-14 Oct-14 Nov-14 Dec-14 Jan-15 Feb-15 Number DCL 利 便数 of DCL issue 11,049 10,910 11,380 11,199 11,590 13,029 14,592 15,101 14,859 15,451 15,458 14,342 Total Number DCL of 成功数 Departure 10,122 10,060 10,558 10,391 10,612 12,038 13,982 14,525 14,128 14,863 14,822 13,635 DCL Utilization 成功率 success rate ratio 91.61% 92.21% 92.78% 92.79% 91.56% 92.39% 95.82% 96.19% 95.08% 96.19% 95.89% 95.07% Number DCL 利 便数 of DCL issue 7,958 8,297 8,731 8,528 8,887 9,368 9,727 10,134 10,217 10,568 10,494 9,652 RJTT Number DCL of 成功数 Departure 7,738 8,050 8,487 8,316 8,594 8,991 9,492 9,919 9,869 10,332 10,226 9,344 DCL Utilization 成功率 success rate ratio 97.24% 97.02% 97.21% 97.51% 96.70% 95.98% 97.58% 97.88% 96.59% 97.77% 97.45% 96.81% Number DCL 利 便数 of DCL issue 3,091 2,613 2,649 2,671 2,703 3,661 4,865 4,967 4,642 4,883 4,964 4,690 RJAA Number DCL of 成功数 Departure 2,384 2,010 2,071 2,075 2,018 3,047 4,490 4,606 4,259 4,531 4,596 4,291 DCL Utilization 成功率 success rate ratio 77.13% 76.92% 78.18% 77.69% 74.66% 83.23% 92.29% 92.73% 91.75% 92.79% 92.59% 91.49% 12,000 10,000 8,000 6,000 4,000 2,000 0 RJTT Number 利 便数 of DCL issue RJAA Number 利 便数 of DCL issue Success 成功率 rate RJTT Success 成功率 rate RJAA Success 成功率 rate (RJTT) Phase-II (RJAA) Phase-III Mar 14 Apr 14 May 14 Jun 14 Jul 14 Aug 14 Sep 14 Oct 14 Nov 14 Dec 14 Jan 15 Feb 15 (ALL) (RJTT) (RJAA) 100% 95% 90% 85% 80% 75% 70% RJTT: Tokyo International Airport (HANEDA) RJAA : Narita International Airport (NARITA) 12

17 Continental CPDLC Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism 13

18 Continental CPDLC (OI-29-2) Making Maximum Use of the Capability of Human Beings and Machines A highly automated and comprehensive ATC support system is indispensable A pilot and a air traffic controller focus on providing value-added services by automating routine communication. CARATS decided to implement Continental CPDLC in Taking into account the implementation of the related OIs. (Airspace re-formation, DARP etc ) 14

19 Change of Domestic Airspace and Facilities Re-formation the current domestic airspace (En-route and ACA) Reducing ATC workload totally and improving ATC operational efficiency. Re-design of Airspace Consolidation of Facilities 13

20 Continental CPDLC (OI-29-2) Items of Continental CPDLC Note: The details under review Fiscal Year Implemenation airspace Upper Western airspace Whole upper airspace Trial Operation Expansion to the whole en-route Expansion of ITEMs Com transfer DBC Microphone check CDO (OI-13) Upper Western airspace Route instruction (UPR+DARP: OI-5) Level instruction Time restriction (OI-16, 18) Time based-metering (OI-19) Speed instruction Com transfer DBC Microphone check CDO (OI-13) Lower Western airspace Route instruction (limited) Route instruction Level instruction (limited) Level instruction Time restriction (OI-16, 18) Time based-metering (OI-19) Speed instruction Com transfer DBC Microphone check CDO (OI-13) Upper Eastern airspace Route instruction (UPR+DARP : OI-5) Level instruction Time restriction (OI-16, 18) Time based-metering (OI-19) Speed instruction Com transfer DBC Microphone check CDO (OI-13) Lower Eastern airspace Route instruction (limited) Route instruction Level instruction (limited) Level instruction Time restriction (OI-16, 18) Time based-metering (OI-19) Speed instruction 15

21 Future Operation of en-route airspace Image of domestic airspace operation by data link UPR+DARP CPDLC Upper En-route UPR+DARP CPDLC Oceanic UPR+DARP CPDLC Passing-over Domestic arrivals Level instruction (CPDLC) International departures CDO (CPDLC) Dynamic sector configuration Variable sector Upper sectors Reforming Enroute airspace CFDT (CPDLC) CDO Com transfer (CPDLC) Lower sectors Time based-metering RECAT AMAN/DMAN/SMAN 16

22 Any Question?

23 Buck up Slides

24 Data link operations in Japan 23 MTSAT Satellite Inmarsat Oceanic airspace ATC Data link operations Oceanic ATC D-ATIS DCL Satellite & VHF SITA/ ARINC DSPs Inter-work AVICOM VHF HANEDA & NARIT airports Media Oceanic:VHF, MTSAT, Inmarsat D-ATIS:VHF, MTSAT, Inmarsat DCL:VHF, MTSAT, Inmarsat DSPs JCAB(Kobe) AVICOM SITA ARINC MTSAT Kobe Aeronautical Satellite Center Data link server FDMS Data link server ARTS~FDMS~IECS (DCL) VHF Providers AVICOM SITA ARINC Fukuoka ATMC (Oceanic ATC) TOKYO Area Control Center (DCL) Black line CPDLC/ADS-C Red line DCL JCAB systems

25 PBCS Monitoring in Fukuoka FIR August 2014 January 2015 Central Reporting Agency (CRA) Technical Management Center (TMC) Air Navigation Services Engineering Division Civil Aviation Bureau of JAPAN (JCAB)

26 Availability PBCS Report Aug-14 to Jan-15 Notified System Outages Start Start Duration Planed/ Service Location CSP Date Time (min) Unplanned Involved Involved Notes 2014/08/06 22:33 87 Unplanned SITA I-3 POR1 due to problem at the Ground Earth Station 2014/09/08 20: Unplanned SITA Iridium IGW1 Iridium Gateway were intermittently down 2014/09/11 08:55 23 Unplanned SITA Iridium IGW1 Iridium Gateway were intermittently down 2014/09/11 10: Unplanned SITA Iridium IGW1 due to an interruption of the main lease lines which were affected by flooding 2014/09/23 19: Unplanned ARINC I-3 XXP XXP I3 INMARSAT GES not processing any traffic. 2014/09/23 19: Unplanned SITA I-3 POR1 unscheduled loss of Network service 2014/10/25 02: Unplanned SITA I-3 POR1 due to problem at the Ground Earth Station 2014/10/25 02: Unplanned ARINC I-3 XXP network service degradation 2014/11/17 02:35 16 Unplanned ARINC I-3 Global Inmarsat network service degradation 2014/11/17 15:45 89 Unplanned SITA Iridium IGW1 possibility of intermittent SBD Service delays 2015/01/07 06:47 9 Unplanned SITA MTSAT MTS1 hardware problem for MTSAT-GES during switchover Summary Number of Accumulated Number of DSP Location Availability Unplanned Outages Unplanned Outage Unplanned Outage > 10min Time (min) POR % SITA IGW % MTS % ARINC I % XXP 99.87%

27 Observed Performance by Media Type PBCS Report Aug-14 to Jan-15 ADS-C [RSP180] CPDLC [RCP240] Media Type Count of ADS-C 95% (90sec) ASP 99.9% (180sec) Count of CPDLC 95% (120sec) ACTP 99.9% (150sec) 95% (180sec) ACP 99.9% (210sec) PORT 95% (60sec) Total 2,204, % 99.5% 43, % 99.6% 99.3% 99.5% 98.4% SAT 1,711, % 99.4% 39, % 99.6% 99.2% 99.5% 98.5% VHF 492, % 99.7% 3, % 100.0% 99.7% 99.7% 97.8% 2

28 Observed Performance by Media Type PBCS Report Aug-14 to Jan-15 ADS-C Actual Surveillance Performance (ASP) Total(2,204,505) SAT(1,711,785) VHF(492,720) 100% 99% 98% 97% 96% 95% 94% 93% 92% 91% 90% Time (seconds) 3

29 Observed Performance by Media Type PBCS Report Aug-14 to Jan-15 CPDLC Actual Communication Performance (ACP) Total(43,789) SAT/SAT(39,823) VHF/VHF(3,520) 100% 99% 98% 97% 96% 95% 94% 93% 92% 91% 90% Time (seconds) 4

30 Observed Performance by Media Type PBCS Report Aug-14 to Jan-15 CPDLC Actual Communication Technical Performance (ACTP) Total(43,789) SAT/SAT(39,823) VHF/VHF(3,520) 100% 99% 98% 97% 96% 95% 94% 93% 92% 91% 90% Time (seconds) 5

31 Observed Performance by Media Type PBCS Report Aug-14 to Jan-15 CPDLC Pilot Operational Response Time (PORT) Total(43,789) 100% 99% 98% 97% 96% 95% 94% 93% 92% 91% 90% Time (seconds) 6