RICCARTON/WIGRAM COMMUNITY BOARD AGENDA TUESDAY 18 NOVEMBER 2014 AT 4.30PM

Transcription

1 RICCARTON/WIGRAM COMMUNITY BOARD AGENDA TUESDAY 18 NOVEMBER 2014 AT 4.30PM IN THE COMMUNITY ROOM, UPPER RICCARTON LIBRARY, 71 MAIN SOUTH ROAD, CHRISTCHUCH Community Board: Mike Mora (Chairperson), Helen Broughton (Deputy Chairperson), Natalie Bryden, Vicki Buck, Jimmy Chen, Peter Laloli, Debbie Mora Community Board Adviser Peter Dow Phone DDI or PART A - MATTERS REQUIRING A COUNCIL DECISION PART B - REPORTS FOR INFORMATION PART C - DELEGATED DECISIONS INDEX PART C 1. APOLOGIES 3 PART B 2. DECLARATION OF INTEREST 3 PART C 3. CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES 4 NOVEMBER PART B 4. DEPUTATIONS BY APPOINTMENT Halswell Community Project 4.2 Halswell School Board of Trustees 4.3 Sport Canterbury and Affinity Trust PART B 5. PETITIONS 7 PART B 6. NOTICE OF MOTION 7 PART B 7. CORRESPONDENCE 7 PG NO PART B 8. BRIEFINGS 8.1 Libraries 2025 Facilities Plan Review PART C 9. PROPOSED ROAD AND RIGHT-OF-WAY NAME - EDWIN EBBETT PLACE AND ERLING ZIESLER LANE PART C 10. RICCARTON/WIGRAM COMMUNITY BOARD 2014/15 DISCRETIONARY RESPONSE FUND APPLICATION HORNBY DAY CARE TRUST For copies of Agendas and Reports, visit:

2 PART C 11. RICCARTON/WIGRAM COMMUNITY BOARD 2014/15 DISCRETIONARY RESPONSE FUND APPLICATION - AVONHEAD COMMUNITY TRUST 14 PART C 12. HANRAHAN STREET - NO STOPPING RESTRICTIONS 17 PART C 13. AMYES ROAD - PROPOSED BUS STOP RELOCATION 22 PART C 14. HALSWELL SCHOOL REBUILD - PROPOSED SCHOOL ROAD PARKING CHANGES 25 PART C 15. PROPOSED BUS STOPS RESULTING FROM METRO REVIEW 30 PART A 16. WATERLOO ROAD - HORNBY SCHOOLS - VARIABLE SPEED LIMIT 56 PART B 17. COMMUNITY BOARD ADVISER S UPDATE 61 PART B 18. ELECTED MEMBERS INFORMATION EXCHANGE 66 PART B 19. BOARD MEMBERS QUESTIONS UNDER STANDING ORDERS 66

3 APOLOGIES 2. DECLARATION OF INTEREST Members are reminded of the need to be vigilant to stand aside from the decision making when a conflict arises between their role as a member and any private or other external interest they might have. 3. CONFIRMATION OF MEETING MINUTES 4 NOVEMBER 2014 The minutes of the Board s Ordinary Meeting of 4 November 2014 are attached. STAFF RECOMMENDATION That the minutes of the Board s Ordinary Meeting of 4 November 2014, be confirmed.

4 ATTACHMENT TO CLAUSE 3 RICCARTON/WIGRAM COMMUNITY BOARD Minutes of a meeting of the Riccarton/Wigram Community Board held on Tuesday 4 November 2014 at 4.03pm in the Community Room, Upper Riccarton Library, 71 Main South Road. PRESENT: APOLOGIES: Mike Mora (Chairperson), Helen Broughton, Natalie Bryden, Peter Laloli and Debbie Mora Apologies for absence were received and accepted from Vicki Buck and Jimmy Chen. The Board reports that: PART B - REPORTS FOR INFORMATION 1. DECLARATION OF INTEREST Nil. 2. DEPUTATIONS BY APPOINTMENT Nil. 3. PETITIONS Nil. 4. NOTICES OF MOTION Nil. 5. CORRESPONDENCE Correspondence was tabled from Mr G M Bennett regarding flooding issues in North Halswell. The Board decided: 5.1 That the correspondence from Mr G M Bennett be received. 5.2 That Mr Bennett s correspondence be circulated to the Mayor, Councillors, and relevant Council staff so as to be read and aligned with their relevant workings of reports, consents and decision making processes in regard to Meadowlands and Hendersons Basin. 5.3 That the correspondence form part of the staff presentation to the Joint Community Board (Spreydon/Heathcote and Riccarton/Wigram Community Boards) public workshop to be held regarding the North Halswell area.

5 ATTACHMENT TO CLAUSE 3 CONT D 6. BRIEFINGS Nil. 7. COMMUNITY BOARD ADVISER S UPDATE The Board received information on upcoming Board related activities including a meeting on Monday 1 December 2014 regarding the Representation Review Workshop with local Residents Associations. The Board was advised of the staff connection undertaken with the three Halswell Christmas Carol groups for whom funding support had come from the Board in 2014/15. For information, the Board was provided with a copy of the Chief Executive s Community Board Report for October Clause 7 continued (Part C) of these minutes records the Board s decision to approve retrospectively at a later meeting, the Board s cross submissions made on the Proposed Replacement District Plan. The Board also resolved to hold an Extraordinary Meeting on 25 November 2014 regarding the Riccarton Road Passenger Transport project. 8. ELECTED MEMBERS INFORMATION EXCHANGE Mention was made of the following: Westmorland Residents Association Annual General Meeting inspirational speaker Sedgwick Reserve start work notice regarding parks maintenance Gilberthorpes Estate Residents Association recent onsite meeting to discuss concerns in relation to the resource consent application for 50 Roberts Road Trees issues general 9. BOARD MEMBERS QUESTIONS UNDER STANDING ORDERS Nil. PART C - REPORT ON DELEGATED DECISIONS TAKEN BY THE BOARD 10. CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES 14 OCTOBER 2014 The Board resolved that the minutes of its ordinary meeting of 14 October 2014, be confirmed subject to the wording amendment (as shown in bold) regarding the Wigram Road/Magdala Place Link project as follows: Conveys its concerns regarding the safety barrier changes and the dual cycleway and further that the Infrastructure, Transport and Environment Committee recommend that the Council approve the re-positioning of the solid bridge barrier from the inside edge of the raised shared path, to the outside edge of the bridge.

6 ATTACHMENT TO CLAUSE 3 CONT D 7. COMMUNITY BOARD ADVISER S UPDATE CONTINUED Further to Clause 7 (Part B) of these minutes, the Board resolved: 7.1 That the Board s cross submissions on the Proposed Replacement District Plan be approved retrospectively by the Board at a later meeting. 7.2 That an Extraordinary Meeting of the Riccarton/Wigram Community Board be held on Tuesday 25 November 2015 at 5pm in the Board Room, Fendalton Service Centre, Corner Jeffreys and Clyde Roads, to consider the Riccarton Road Passenger Transport project. The meeting concluded at 4.35pm. CONFIRMED THIS 18TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2014 MIKE MORA CHAIRPERSON

7 DEPUTATIONS BY APPOINTMENT 4.1 HALSWELL COMMUNITY PROJECT Chrys Horn, representing the Halswell Community Project, has been granted speaking rights to address the Board in relation to the funding received through the Board s Strengthening Communities Fund allocation. 4.2 HALSWELL SCHOOL BOARD OF TRUSTEES Justin Davies, Chairman of the Halswell School Board of Trustees, has been granted speaking rights to address the Board in relation to the proposed bus stop and parking changes adjacent to the Halswell School. Clause 14 of this agenda refers. 4.3 SPORT CANTERBURY AND AFFINITY TRUST Chris Crichton, Sport Canterbury Community Sport Adviser and Matt Meek of the Affinity Trust have been granted speaking rights to present newly established community initiatives within the Riccarton community. They will talk around the success and impact of the recent Howzat Primary School Competition and to focus looking forward to the upcoming Touch Module. 5. PETITIONS 6. NOTICES OF MOTION 7. CORRESPONDENCE 8. BRIEFINGS 8.1 LIBRARIES 2025 FACILITIES PLAN REVIEW At its meeting on 25 September 2014, the Council resolved that the report on this matter be referred to the Community Boards for their consideration. A copy of the report has been separately circulated to members. Sally Thompson, Places and Spaces Manager, Libraries and Information Unit, will be in attendance to brief the Board.

8 PROPOSED ROAD AND RIGHT-OF-WAY NAME - EDWIN EBBETT PLACE AND ERLING ZIESLER LANE Executive Leadership Team Member responsible: Chief Planning Officer Contact N Contact Details Officer responsible: Manager Resource Consents N Author: Bob Pritchard Bob Pritchard, Subdivision Officer Y PURPOSE AND ORIGIN OF REPORT 1.1 The purpose of this staff initiated report is to obtain the Riccarton/Wigram Community Board s approval to a new road name and a new right-of-way name. 2. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2.1 A subdivision adjoining Wigram Road will create a cul de sac running off newly formed Platinum Drive. The cul de sac will be a legal road. A large formed and sealed right of way will run off the end of the cul de sac. Nine of the new allotments in the subdivision will have frontage to Platinum Drive. Another seventeen allotments will be accessed by the new cul de sac and three accessed from the right-of-way. A new reserve of 6178 square metres will run alongside the Heathcote River. 2.2 It is proposed to name the new cul de sac Edwin Ebbett Place, and the right-of-way is proposed as Erling Ziesler Lane. The names are those of two pilots killed in an air crash in the area in In the event that the Board wishes to decline the proposed names, then the names of the other aircrew could be used. 3. BACKGROUND 3.1 The following historical information and background to the two names has been provided by the development company. The developers wish to recognise the history of the area and in particular the crash of two Devon aircraft in The two aircrafts involved in the accident were Royal New Zealand Air Force de Havilland Devons. One of the aircraft crashed onto this site. Some information on the crash was supplied by Mr Fensom. The crews were Flight Lieutenant Edwin P B Ebbett AFC, Aircraftman Brian J Keogh and Aircraftman Eric Melrose, Flight Lieutenant Erling W Ziesler, Squadron Leader Sholto R Duncan (AM(US), Aircraftman William Sharman and Aircraftman Russell Woodcock. The two pilots were Flight Lieutenant Ebbett and Flight Lieutenant Ziesler The crash took place on 15 October The two Devons collided over Wigram Aerodrome. The first aircraft had led the last section of a 27 aircraft flypast over Harewood International Airport marking the London to Christchurch Air Race Prize Giving Ceremony. The wings of the two aircraft touched each other, and both aircraft went out of control and struck the ground 200 yards apart. All seven people aboard both aircraft were killed, the highest loss of life incurred by the Royal New Zealand Air Force in a single New Zealand accident. (Further limited information can be made available from the report author). 3.2 The proposed right-of-way name is consistent with Council s Right of Way Naming Policy. 4. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS 4.1 There are no financial costs to the Council from either application. The administration fee for road naming is included as part of the subdivision consent application fee and the cost of the nameplates are charged direct to the developer.

9 Cont d 5. STAFF RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Riccarton/Wigram Community Board: 5.1 Approve the names Edwin Ebbett Place and Erling Ziesler Lane.

10 ATTACHMENT 1 TO CLAUSE 9

11 RICCARTON/WIGRAM COMMUNITY BOARD 2014/15 DISCRETIONARY RESPONSE FUND APPLICATION HORNBY DAY CARE TRUST Contact Contact Details Executive Leadership Team Director, Office of the Chief Executive N Responsible: Officer Responsible: Community Support Unit Transitional Manager N Author Karla Gunby, Strengthening Communities Adviser Y PURPOSE AND ORIGIN OF REPORT 1.1 The purpose of this staff initiated report is for the Riccarton/Wigram Community Board to consider the funding application from the Hornby Day Care Trust for Live Entertainment and Dancing for senior clients for the amount of $2,500 from its 2014/15 Discretionary Response Fund. 2. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2.1 Not applicable. 3. BACKGROUND 3.1 The purpose of the Fund is to assist community groups where the project and funding request falls outside other Council funding criteria and/or closing dates. This fund is also for emergency funding for unforeseen situations. 3.2 At its meeting on 22 April 2010, the Council resolved to change the criteria and delegations around the local Discretionary Response Fund. 3.3 The change in criteria limited the items that the local Discretionary Response Fund does not cover to only: Legal challenges or Environment Court challenges against the Council, Council Controlled Organisations or Community Boards decisions; Projects or initiatives that change the scope of a Council project; and Projects or initiatives that will lead to ongoing operational costs to the Council. The Council also made a note that: "Community Boards can recommend to the Council for consideration grants under (3.3.2) and (3.3.3)." 4. COMMENT 4.1 In 2014/15, the budget available for allocation in the Riccarton/Wigram Discretionary Response Fund is $51,197. The Discretionary Response Fund opens each year on 1 July and closes on 30 June the following year, or when all funds are expended. 4.2 Based on the above criteria, the application from Hornby Day Care Trust is eligible for funding. 4.3 Detailed information on the application and staff comments is included in the Decision Matrix (refer Attachment 1).

12 Cont d 5. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS 5.1 There is currently a balance of $37,197 in the Board s 2014/15 Discretionary Response Fund. 5.2 Current recommendations align with the Three Year Plan page 227, regarding community grants schemes including Board funding. 6. STAFF RECOMMENDATION 6.1 It is recommended that the Riccarton/Wigram Community Board approve a grant of $1,000 from its 2014/15 Discretionary Response Fund to the Hornby Day Care Trust towards live entertainment for senior clients.

13 2014/15 DRF RICCARTON-WIGRAM DECISION MATRIX Priority Rating One Meets all eligibility criteria and contributes significantly to Funding Outcomes and Priorities. Highly recommended for funding. Two Three Four Meets all eligibility criteria and contributes to Funding Outcomes and Priorities. Recommended for funding. Meets all eligibility criteria and contributes to Funding Outcomes and Priorities but to a lesser extent than Priority 2 applications. Not recommended for funding. ATTACHMENT TO CLAUSE 10 Meets all eligibility criteria and has minimum contribution to Funding Outcomes and Priorities / Insufficient information provided by applicant (in application and after request from Advisor) / Other funding sources more appropriate. Not recommended for funding Organisation Name Project Name and Description Total Cost Contribution sought towards Staff Recommendation Priority Hornby Day Care Trust Live Entertainment and Dancing for Senior Clients Hornby Day Care Trust wishes to provide live entertainment and dancing sessions for their senior clients. $ 2,500 $ Requested $ 2,500 (100% requested) Entertainers - $2,500 $ 1,000 That the Riccarton/Wigram Community Board makes a grant of $1,000 to the Hornby Day Care Trust towards live entertainment for the senior clients. 2 ORGANISATION DETAILS Service Base: Carmen Road, Hornby Legal Status: Charitable Trust Established: 1/02/2008 Target groups: Older Adults Annual Volunteer Hours: 0 Project Participants: 65 ALIGNMENT WITH COUNCIL STRATEGIES Strengthening Communities Strategy Ageing Together Policy Riccarton/Wigram Community Board Objectives 9, 10, 12 CCC Funding History Nil Other Sources of Funding (this project only) Nil Staff Assessment The Hornby Day Care Trust provides day respite care and recreation activities for senior clients that either live by themselves or with a family member. They are based on Carmen Road in Hornby and operate between Monday and Thursday. Many clients have early onset dementia and the recreation activities and entertainment are used to provide mental stimulation and support their ongoing wellbeing. Individuals are encouraged to participate in quizzes, card games, physical games such as quoits, skittles and staff led exercise programs. The clients are offered morning and afternoon tea with light refreshments and a two course hot meal for lunch. The clients are assessed by the Older Persons Health Specialist Service Community Team. The Canterbury District Health Board department within the Princess Margaret Hospital provide referrals but at present they are fully booked with 68 clients. Hornby Day Care Trust wish to hire local Christchurch musicians to provide live music, singing and dancing opportunities for clients alongside the other activities they offer. This is the first time that Hornby Day Care Trust have sought funding from the Community Board.

14 RICCARTON/WIGRAM COMMUNITY BOARD 2014/15 DISCRETIONARY RESPONSE FUND APPLICATION - AVONHEAD COMMUNITY TRUST Contact Contact Details Executive Leadership Team Director, Office of the Chief Executive N Responsible: Officer Responsible: Community Support Transitional Manager N Author Marie Byrne, Strengthening Communities Adviser Y PURPOSE AND ORIGIN OF REPORT 1.1 The purpose of this staff initiated report is for the Riccarton/Wigram Community Board to consider the application from Avonhead Community Trust for the Community Event during Neighbourhood Week for the amount of $475 for funding from its 2014/15 Discretionary Response Fund. 2. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2.1 Not applicable. 3. BACKGROUND 3.1 The purpose of the Fund is to assist community groups where the project and funding request falls outside other council funding criteria and/or closing dates. This fund is also for emergency funding for unforeseen situations. 3.2 At its meeting on 22 April 2010, the Council resolved to change the criteria and delegations around the local Discretionary Response Fund. 3.3 The change in criteria limited the items that the local Discretionary Response Fund does not cover to only: Legal challenges or Environment Court challenges against the Council, Council Controlled Organisations or Community Boards decisions; Projects or initiatives that change the scope of a Council project; and Projects or initiatives that will lead to ongoing operational costs to the Council. The Council also made a note that: "Community Boards can recommend to the Council for consideration grants under (3.3.2) and (3.3.3)." 4. COMMENT 4.1 In 2014/15, the budget available for allocation in the Riccarton/Wigram Discretionary Response Fund is $51,197. The Discretionary Response Fund opens each year on 1 July and closes on 30 June the following year, or when all funds are expended. 4.2 Based on the above criteria, the application from Avonhead Community Trust is eligible for funding. 4.3 Detailed information on the application and staff comments are included in the Decision Matrix (Attachment 1).

15 Cont d 5. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS 5.1 There is currently a balance of $37,197 in the Board s 2014/15 Discretionary Response Fund. 5.2 Current recommendations align with the Three Year Plan page 227, regarding community grants schemes including Board funding. 6. STAFF RECOMMENDATION 6.1 It is recommended that the Riccarton/Wigram Community Board approve a grant of $475 from its 2014/15 Discretionary Response Fund to the Avonhead Community Trust towards entertainment and refreshments for its Community Event during Neighbourhood Week to be held on 31 October 2014.

16 2014/15 DRF RICCARTON-WIGRAM DECISION MATRIX Priority Rating One Meets all eligibility criteria and contributes significantly to Funding Outcomes and Priorities. Highly recommended for funding. Two Three Four Meets all eligibility criteria and contributes to Funding Outcomes and Priorities. Recommended for funding. Meets all eligibility criteria and contributes to Funding Outcomes and Priorities but to a lesser extent than Priority 2 applications. Not recommended for funding. ATTACHMENT TO CLAUSE 11 Meets all eligibility criteria and has minimum contribution to Funding Outcomes and Priorities / Insufficient information provided by applicant (in application and after request from Advisor) / Other funding sources more appropriate. Not recommended for funding Organisation Name Project Name and Description Total Cost Contribution sought towards Staff Recommendation Priority Avonhead Community Trust Community Event during Neighbourhood Week Avonhead Community Trust wish to host a community event as an alternative to Halloween $ 975 $ Requested $ 475 (49% requested) Entertainment/Refreshments - $475 $ 475 That the Riccarton/Wigram Community Board makes a grant of $475 to the Avonhead Community Trust towards entertainment and refreshments for their Community Event during Neighbourhood Week to be held on 31 October ORGANISATION DETAILS Service Base: Avonhead Baptist Church Legal Status: Charitable Trust Established: 30/01/1996 Target Groups: Families Annual Volunteer Hours: 5,000 Project Participants: 250 ALIGNMENT WITH COUNCIL STRATEGIES Strengthening Communities Strategy Riccarton/Wigram Community Board Objectives 2, 9,10, 12 CCC Funding History 2013/14 - $8,000 (A Whole Village) SCF 2013/14 - $10,000 (Sports Coordinator) SCF 2013/14 - $11,000 (A Whole Village) SCF FW 2012/13 - $4,531 (Sports Coordinator) DRF 2012/13 - $13,500 (A Whole Village) SCF F/W 2012/13 - $8,000 (A Whole Village) SCF 2011/12 - $24,000 (24-7 YouthWork at Burnside High) SCF 2011/12 - $10,000 (Youth Coordinator) SCF 2011/12 - $13,500 (A Whole Village) SCF F/W Other Sources of Funding (this project only) Avonhead Community Trust - $500 Staff Assessment The Avonhead Community Trust wish to host a family event on 31 October 2014 for the local Avonhead community that is an alternative to Halloween. This event, which has been run for a number of years, coincides with Neighbourhood Week. Applications for this event have in the past been made through individuals and the Avonhead Baptist Church and granted Neighbourhood Week funding by the Riccarton/Wigram Community Board. Through an administrative oversight this application was not able to be considered with other Neighbourhood Week applications, hence the application to the Board's Discretionary Response Fund. There are an increasing number of events that are being organised in local communities as alternatives to Halloween. The Riccarton/Wigram Community Board has already granted funding to similar events in Halswell for example: Halswell Light Party - $1000 (South West Baptist Church) Hornby Spring Party - $500 (Hornby Presbyterian Community Trust)

17 HANRAHAN STREET NO STOPPING RESTRICTIONS Executive Leadership Team Member responsible: Officer responsible: General Manager, Culture Leisure and Parks Unit Manager, Transport and City Streets Contact N Contact Details Author: Steve Dejong, Traffic Engineer Y DDI PURPOSE AND ORIGIN OF REPORT 1.1 The purpose of this report is to seek the Riccarton/Wigram Community Board s approval to install No Stopping Restrictions at either end of Hanrahan Street. (refer Attachments 1 and 2). 1.2 This is a staff initiated report following requests from a resident of Hanrahan Street and is a safety improvement to mitigate the instances of potential head on conflict. N 2. BACKGROUND 2.1 The Council has received a request from a resident to install no stopping restrictions at either end of Hanrahan Street. Staff met with the resident and together investigated his request. Staff have agreed to seek the approval of the Riccarton/Wigram Community Board to install no stopping restrictions at the western end of Hanrahan Street at its intersection with Waimairi Road and also at the eastern end of its intersection with Ilam Road. (see Plan A and B Attachment 1) 2.2 At the western end of Hanrahan Street there is a chicane designed to narrow the Waimairi Road entry of Hanrahan Street. Although there are currently no stopping lines around the frontage of the chicane, adjacent to it, no stopping lines have not been marked. A motor vehicle is often parked in this location which creates a more severe narrowing than was initially intended. (see Attachment 1 - Plan A). 2.3 At the eastern end of Hanrahan Street there are build-outs on both sides of Hanrahan Street designed to restrict the entry to Hanrahan Street. Motor vehicles often park directly up to the build-outs which creates a more severe narrowing than was initially intended. (see Attachment 1 - Plan B). 2.4 Because of the vehicles parked in the above mentioned locations motorists entering and exiting Hanrahan Street can find their vehicle head on with another vehicle travelling in the opposite direction. Although one way sections of road are acceptable traffic calming devices on local roads, it is not good to have this situation at the intersection of a local road with a high volume road. 2.5 While speaking to affected residents in the street, staff were informed of two other narrowings in Hanrahan Street where vehicles were from time to time parked, completely blocking the through movement of traffic. Staff investigated these locations and identified that the narrowings at only 3.5 metres wide would also require no stopping lines. It is therefore thought prudent to include both these locations requiring no stopping lines within the same report. (see Attachment 2 - Plan C). 3. COMMENT 3.1 To resolve the above mentioned issues it is proposed to install additional no stopping restrictions to prevent parking in the locations identified at either end of Hanrahan Street. The proposed no stopping lines will allow motorists to enter and exit Hanrahan Street, unimpeded by vehicles travelling in the opposite direction. (see Attachment 1 - Plan A and B).

18 12. Cont d As a result of this proposal, three unrestricted parking spaces will be removed. At present the two spaces at the eastern end of Hanrahan Street are taken up all day by university students, while the one space at the western end of the street is usually free. The proposed stopping restrictions outside numbers five and 16 are just formalising common sense. If a vehicle was to park in these locations all the usable 3.2 metre wide carriageway would be completely blocked to all through traffic. 3.3 All residents of Hanrahan Street directly adjacent to the proposed no stopping restrictions have been informed of the proposal by letter box drop and several were spoken to; no objections were received. 3.4 Part 1, Clause 5 of the Christchurch City Council Parking Bylaw 2008 provides the Council with the authority to install parking restrictions by resolution. 3.5 The installation of any parking restriction signs and/or markings must comply with the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices The recommendations in this proposal align with Christchurch Transport Strategic Plan The Team Leader Parking Enforcement supports this proposal. 4. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS 4.1 The estimated cost of this proposal is approximately $ The installation of traffic signs and road markings is within the Long Term Plan Streets and Transport Operational Budgets. 5. STAFF RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Riccarton/Wigram Community Board: 5.1 Approve that any parking restrictions located on the south side of Hanrahan Street commencing at its intersection with Waimairi Road and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 23 metres, be revoked. 5.2 Approve that any parking restrictions located on the north side of Hanrahan Street commencing at its intersection with Waimairi Road and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 18 metres, be revoked. 5.3 Approve that any parking restrictions located on the south side of Hanrahan Street commencing at its intersection with Ilam Road and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 23 metres, be revoked. 5.4 Approve that any parking restrictions located on the north side of Hanrahan Street commencing at its intersection with Ilam Road and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 10 metres, be revoked. 5.5 Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of Hanrahan Street commencing at its intersection with Waimairi Road and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 23 metres. 5.6 Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of Hanrahan Street commencing at its intersection with Waimairi Road and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 18 metres.

19 12. Cont d Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of Hanrahan Street commencing at its intersection with Ilam Road and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 23 metres. 5.8 Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of Hanrahan Street commencing at its intersection with Ilam Road and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 10 metres. 5.9 Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of Hanrahan Street commencing at a point 62 metres west of its intersection with Ilam Road and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 20 metres Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of Hanrahan Street commencing at a point 131 metres west of its intersection with Ilam Road and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 14 metres.

20 ATTACHMENT 1 TO CLAUSE 12

21 - 21 ATTACHMENT 2 TO CLAUSE 12

22 AMYES ROAD - PROPOSED BUS STOP RELOCATION Executive Leadership Team Member responsible: Officer responsible: General Manager, Culture Leisure and Parks Unit Manager, Transport and City Streets Contact N Contact Details Author: Steve Dejong, Traffic Engineer Y DDI PURPOSE AND ORIGIN OF REPORT 1.1 The purpose of this report is to seek the approval of the Riccarton/Wigram Community Board to relocate the Bus Stop from number four Amyes Road to number 22 Amyes Road (refer Attachment 1). 1.2 This is a staff initiated report following requests from a resident who has observed the bus having difficulty exiting the stop to turn right onto Shands Road. N 2. BACKGROUND 2.1 The Council has received a request from a resident to relocate the bus stop currently located at number four Amyes Road. He stated that the bus has difficulty exiting the stop to access the right turn lane on route to the Hornby Hub. 2.2 Staff investigated the request and confirmed that following the post quake moves to the south west, vehicles are now parked daily at the northwest end of Amyes Road. This all day parking is mostly associated with retail staff working in the Hub or Dressmart. 2.3 Once the bus enters the stop it is trapped there by vehicle queues from the signals at the Shands Road intersection. On exiting the stop, the bus must move across the straight through lane to the right turn lane to make a right turn onto Shands Road en route to the interchange located at the Hub. 2.4 As this is the last stop before the Hub, Council staff were reluctant to remove it and therefore spoke to the management of Gough Gough and Hamer located at number 22 Amyes Road to see if they were agreeable to the stop being located outside their premises. Placing the stop in this proposed location would not require the removal of parking from outside a private residential property and would improve sight lines at the entrance to the Gough Gough and Hamer car park for the majority of the time when the stop is vacant. Gough Gough and Hamer management are happy with this proposal to locate the bus stop outside their premises. 3. COMMENT 3.1 Relocating the bus stop from number four Amyes Road to number 22 Amyes Road will make entering and exiting the stop more efficient and safer for the bus operator. It will remove the potential for conflict between the bus and other road users at the level crossing and approach to the Shands Road intersection thus improving safety near the signals where the road is more congested. 3.2 It is proposed to install No Stopping lines in the old bus stop location outside number four Amyes Road as this will add a little more space for left turn and right turn vehicles queuing back from the signals at Shands Road. 3.3 The Team Leader Parking Enforcement supports this proposal. 3.4 Environment Canterbury supports this proposal.

23 13. Cont d Part 1, Clause 5 of the Christchurch City Council Parking Bylaw 2008 provides the Council with the authority to install parking restrictions by resolution. 3.6 The Community Boards have delegated authority from the Council to exercise the delegations as set out in the Register of Delegations. The list of delegations for the Community Boards includes the resolution of parking restrictions and traffic control devices. 3.7 The installation of any parking restriction signs and/or markings must comply with the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices The recommendations in this proposal align with Christchurch Transport Strategic Plan FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS 4.1 The estimated cost of this proposal is approximately $ The installation of traffic signs, road markings and the installation and relocation of bus shelters/shelters is within the Long Term Plan Streets and Transport Operational Budgets. 5. STAFF RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Riccarton/Wigram Community Board: 5.1 Approve that all existing parking restrictions currently located on the south west side of Amyes Road commencing at its intersection with Shands Road and extending in a south easterly direction for a distance of 220 metres, be revoked. 5.2 Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south west side of Amyes Road commencing at its intersection with Shands Road and extending in a south easterly direction for a distance of 63 metres. 5.3 Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south west side of Amyes Road commencing at a point 143 metres north west of its intersection with Branston Street and extending in a north westerly direction for a distance of 16 metres. 5.4 Approve that a Bus Stop be installed on the south west side of Amyes Road commencing at a point 159 metres north west of its intersection with Branston Street and extending in a north westerly direction for a distance of 14 metres. 5.5 Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south west side of Amyes Road commencing at a point 173 metres north west of its intersection with Branston Street and extending in a north westerly direction for a distance of four metres.

24 ATTACHMENT 1 TO CLAUSE 13

25 HALSWELL SCHOOL REBUILD - PROPOSED SCHOOL ROAD PARKING CHANGES Executive Leadership Team Member responsible: Officer responsible: General Manager, Culture, Leisure and Parks Unit Manager, Transport and City Streets Contact N Contact Details Author: Steve Dejong Y DDI PURPOSE AND ORIGIN OF REPORT 1.1 The purpose of this report is to seek that the Riccarton/Wigram Community Board s approve to install P3 Parking Restrictions, No Stopping Restrictions and relocate the Bus Stop on School Road outside Halswell Primary School and to install No Stopping Restrictions on Kennedys Bush Road and Provincial Road in the vicinity of the Halswell Primary School (Attachment 1). 1.2 This is a staff initiated report following requests from the Halswell Primary School Board of Trustees to improve safety around the rebuilt school which was damaged beyond repair in the February 2011 earthquakes. N 2. BACKGROUND 2.1 The Council has received a request from the Principal and Board of Trustees of Halswell Primary School to make on street parking changes in the immediate vicinity of Halswell Primary School. 2.2 Halswell Primary School was damaged beyond repair in the February 2011 earthquakes and is currently being rebuilt. The new design of the school will orientate its frontage towards School Road and away from the State Highway (Halswell Road). 2.3 Staff met with the Principal and Board of Trustees of Halswell Primary School on several occasions to identify the needs of the school. Together a proposed plan was formulated that will facilitate the safe and efficient drop off and pick up of children to and from the school and will promote good road user behaviour in the immediate vicinity of Halswell Primary School. 2.4 The Council s Education staff are currently working with the Halswell Primary School to develop a School Travel Plan; this is an on going process and may take up to a year. 3. COMMENT 3.1 It is proposed to relocate the existing bus stop/layover away from the school entry point to the western end of School Road and to install two P3 Parking Restrictions (drop off and pick up zones) on the School Road frontage of the School. 3.2 No Stopping Restrictions are proposed at the intersection of School/Kennedys Bush and Provincial Roads and at the new bus stop location to separate drop off and pick up from other on road activities and identify locations not intended for parking. 3.3 The intersection of Kennedys Bush Road and School Road was altered as part of the Quarry View subdivision. With the provision of a roundabout and the addition of Provincial Road it now forms a cross roads junction. It is not known if the existing rotary Give Way controls at this intersection were ever formally approved by the Riccarton/Wigram Community Board. It is therefore considered prudent to resolve the Give Ways at this time.

26 14. Cont d The proposed No Stopping Restrictions will identify to parents those areas not intended for the delivery and collection of children and will provide sight lines at intersections providing inter visibility between vulnerable and motorised road users. 3.5 The proposed P3 Parking Restrictions will indicate to parents the correct and most appropriate location to drop off and pick up their children from, and will encourage safety and efficiency in the vicinity of the School. 3.6 The proposed bus stop relocation to the western end of School Road will create a separation between differing kerbside activities while still maintaining the same level of service for public transport in the vicinity of the school. Separating these activities will create a safer road environment in the immediate vicinity of the Halswell Primary School. 3.7 The Halswell Primary School Board of Trustees and Principal support this proposal. 3.8 Residents in the immediate vicinity of the proposed parking changes were informed of the changes by a letter with a copy of the proposed plan attached. Two residents responded one seeking further clarification of the plans and after speaking with staff supported the proposal. The other resident had an existing grievance with the Council regarding a splitter island which was installed over the vehicular entrance way of a property he owns at number 2 School Road. Approximately a year ago staff reduced the length of the splitter island. On 1 October 2014, staff met with this resident and explained the proposal to him and also offered to install two more bridge blocks, one on either side of his vehicular entrance way to improve entry and exit. He accepted this offer and appears to be happy with the outcome. 3.9 The Team Leader Parking Enforcement supports this proposal Part 1, Clause 5 of the Christchurch City Council Parking Bylaw 2008 provides the Council with the authority to install parking restrictions by resolution The Community Boards have delegated authority from the Council to exercise the delegations as set out in the Register of Delegations. The list of delegations for the Community Boards includes the resolution of parking restrictions and traffic control devices The installation of any parking restriction signs and / or markings must comply with the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices The recommendations in this proposal align with Christchurch Transport Strategic Plan FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS 4.1 The estimated cost of this proposal is approximately $ The installation of traffic signs, road markings and the installation and relocation of bus shelters/shelters is within the Long Term Plan Streets and Transport Operational Budgets. 5. STAFF RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Riccarton/Wigram Community Board: 5.1 Approve that all existing parking restrictions currently located on the north side of School Road, be revoked.

27 14. Cont d Approve that all existing parking restrictions currently located on the south side of School Road commencing at its intersection with Kennedys Bush Road and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 21 metres, be revoked. 5.3 Approve that all existing parking restrictions currently located on the west side of Kennedys Bush Road commencing at its intersection with School Road and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 35 metres, be revoked. 5.4 Approve that all existing parking restrictions currently located on the west side of Kennedys Bush Road commencing at its intersection with School Road and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 74 metres, be revoked. 5.5 Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of School Road commencing at its intersection with Larsens Road and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of nine metres. 5.6 Approve that a Bus Stop be installed on the north side of School Road commencing at a point nine metres east of its intersection with Larsens Road and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 29 metres. 5.7 Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of School Road commencing at a point 38 metres east of its intersection with Larsens Road and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of eight metres. 5.8 Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of three minutes (8.15 to 9.15 am and 2.30 to 3.30 pm school days) on the north side of School Road commencing at a point 46 metres east of its intersection with Larsens Road and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 59 metres. 5.9 Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of School Road commencing at a point 105 metres east of its intersection with Larsens Road and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 14 metres Approve that the parking of vehicles be restricted to a maximum period of three minutes (8.15 to 9.15 am and 2.30 to 3.30 pm school days) on the north side of School Road commencing at a point 119 metres east of its intersection with Larsens Road and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 61 metres Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of School Road commencing at a point 180 metres east of its intersection with Larsens Road and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 30 metres to its intersection with Kennedys Bush Road Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of School Road commencing at its intersection with Kennedys Bush Road and extending in a westerly direction for a distance of 21 metres Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the west side of Kennedys Bush Road commencing at its intersection with School Road and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 35 metres Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the east side of Kennedys Bush Road commencing at its intersection with Provincial Road and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 34 metres Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the east side of Kennedys Bush Road commencing at its intersection with Provincial Road and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 30 metres.

28 14. Cont d Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the west side of Kennedys Bush Road commencing at its intersection with School Road and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 74 metres Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north side of Provincial Road commencing at its intersection with Kennedys Bush Road and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 28 metres Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the south side of Provincial Road commencing at its intersection with Kennedys Bush Road and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 28 metres Approve that a Give Way Control be placed against School Road at its intersection with Kennedys Bush Road Approve that a Give Way Control be placed against Kennedys Bush Road on the south bound approach to its intersection with Provincial Road and School Road Approve that a Give Way Control be placed against Provincial Road at its intersection with Kennedys Bush Road Approve that a Give Way Control be placed against Kennedys Bush Road on the north bound approach to its intersection with School Road and Provincial Road.

29 - 29 ATTACHMENT 1 TO CLAUSE 14

30 PROPOSED BUS STOPS RESULTING FROM METRO REVIEW Executive Leadership Team Member responsible: Officer responsible: Author: General Manager, Culture Leisure and Parks Unit Manager, Transport and City Streets Luke Morley, Passenger Transport Engineer Contact Contact Details N N Y DDI PURPOSE AND ORIGIN OF REPORT 1.1 The purpose of this report is to seek the Riccarton/Wigram Community Board s approval to install fifteen new bus stops in its ward. 1.2 This is a staff initiated report resulting in new bus stops being required due to the recent Metro Review carried out by Environment Canterbury (ECan). 2. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2.1 Staff have consulted on fifteen proposed bus stop locations and are seeking the Riccarton/Wigram Community Board to resolve fourteen of them as permanent stops. The remaining stop will be installed as a temporary stop in the location shown on the attached plan in order for the bus route to have stops available by 8 December Further consultation will be carried out to determine a permanent location with a report back to the Riccarton/Wigram Community Board. 3. BACKGROUND 3.1 ECan has recently carried out a review of their Metro services to help achieve their goal of a better integrated public transport system. 3.2 After consultation with the community in May and June 2014 the final routes have been approved by the ECan Commissioners in September As a result of these route changes, new stops are required on streets that are newly serviced by Metro buses. 3.4 The recommendations of this report align with Council Strategies including the current Council Transport Strategic Plan The Wigram/Palms via Riccarton (100) will service Corsair Drive and The Runway. The Halswell/Queenspark (7) will service Caulfield Avenue and Hamill Road. The Lincoln/Parklands (80) will service Wharenui Road. 4. COMMENT 4.1 This report is concerned with fifteen bus stop locations: 45R Caulfield Avenue 90 Wharenui Road Opposite 24 Corsair Drive 57 Wharenui Road 20 Corsair Drive 4 Wharenui Road 73 Corsair Drive 5 Wharenui Road 10 Christie Lane (fronting Corsair Drive) 17 The Runway 49 Hamill Road 17R The Runway 42 Hamill Road 3R The Runway 22 The Runway

31 15. Cont d A letter with an information plan showing the location of the bus stops was distributed to the residents, businesses and property owners of properties adjoining each proposed bus stop for their information on 15 September The feedback period closed on 6 October Each person who responded and gave their contact details has received an acknowledgement that their submission has been received and later a second letter was sent giving the outcome of consultation, a summary of the feedback and advice of when a report would be presented to this meeting of the Riccarton/Wigram Community Board requesting their approval to install the bus stops in their area. Details of the Board meeting were also provided so that any interested submitters could attend or address the Board prior to a decision being made. 4.3 Caulfield Avenue Stop This is required by ECan as a terminus stop, it has been sited adjacent to a park and is required to be a double length stop as there will be occasions when two buses will be present at the same time (refer Caulfield Avenue Proposed Bus Stop Plan Attachment 1) Consultation with the affected residents has taken place and no feedback was received. 4.4 Hamill Road Stops A pair of stops are proposed for this road between the Halswell Junction Road Roundabout and John Annan Street. Due to the bus route turning off Hamill Road down Graycliffe Street the only useable bay on the southern side of the road is the one proposed. The northern side does have more available bays but this proposal allows the stop to be sited close to its pair and away from the intersection with Graycliffe Street (refer Hamill Road Proposed Bus Stop Plan - Attachment 4) Consultation with the affected residents has taken place and no feedback was received for the proposed stop outside number For the proposed stop outside number 42, feedback in opposition to the plan was received (refer Feedback Spreadsheet Attachment 9). 4.5 Corsair Drive Stops (Pair 1) The first pair are proposed between Grebe Place and Harvard Avenue. The spacing between the previous stops on Springs Road is approximately 460 metres, the positioning of the pair provides good mid block pedestrian access to the walkway between 20 and 24 Corsair Drive through to Joe Burns Place (refer Corsair Drive Near Harvard Avenue Proposed Bus Stop Plan Attachment 2) Consultation with affected residents has taken place and feedback in opposition to the proposed bus stop outside number 20 (refer Feedback Spreadsheet Attachment 9). After looking at feedback this will be placed as a temporary stop and re-consulted to be relocated outside the walkway (22R) providing the small tree can be relocated. 4.6 Corsair Drive Stops (Pair 2) The second pair are proposed close to the intersection with Gallaghan Close. These have been spaced approximately 480 metres from the previous proposed stops (above). This section of Corsair Drive has a median island and a narrow road width, therefore it is necessary for the bus stops to be located in the bays provided, to ensure through traffic can continue past the stopped bus. The proposed northern stop is located outside the reserve and the southern stop in the closest useable bay, the bay outside 48 to 58 has a street light located at its entrance which would be likely to be hit if the stop was sited here (refer Corsair Drive Near Gallaghan Close Proposed Bus Stop Plan Attachment 3) Consultation with affected residents has taken place and no feedback was received for the proposed stops.

32 15. Cont d The Runway (Pair 1) The pair here are needed close to the Corsair Drive/The Runway Roundabout as in the future this will be close to the future town centre development for this subdivision. The northern stop is located outside Raukura Park in a large bay and the south side is located opposite, allowing pedestrians to make use of the pedestrian crossing facility behind the proposed stop (Refer The Runway Near Deal Street Proposed Bus Stop Plan Attachment 5) Consultation has taken place and feedback in opposition to the proposed southern stop outside numbers 15 to 19 has been received (refer Feedback Spreadsheet Attachment 9). 4.8 The Runway (Pair 2) The proposed pair are spaced approximately 440 metres away from the previous proposed stops (above), they have been located in a pair of bays that had been identified for buses to use after early liaison between Christchurch City Council/ECAN and Ngai Tahu the developer of the Subdivision on the proposed through routes (refer The Runway Near Coull Street Proposed Bus Stop Plan Attachment 6) Consultation with affected residents has taken place and feedback in opposition to the proposed stops was received (refer Feedback Spreadsheet Attachment 9). 4.9 Wharenui Road (Pair 1) There is a requirement for two pairs of stops along the length of Wharenui Road. The first pair is required close to the Riccarton Road intersection to serve the nearby shops and the Kirkwood Intermediate School. In both instances the lead in of the stops has been marked over vehicle entrances to minimise parking loss (refer Wharenui Road Near Riccarton Road Proposed Bus Stop Plan Attachment 7) Consultation with affected residents has taken place and feedback in opposition of the proposed stop outside number five was received in addition to support from Kirkwood School (refer Feedback Spreadsheet Attachment 9) Feedback in support of the proposed stop outside number four was received (refer Feedback Spreadsheet Attachment 9) Wharenui Road (Pair 2) The second pair is required closer to the Blenheim Road intersection. The proposed location is approximately 520 metres away from the previous proposed stops (above), they have been located close to the Janet Street and Puna Street intersections to decrease walking distances for bus passengers living on these side streets (refer Wharenui Road Near Puna Street Proposed Bus Stop Plan Attachment 8) Consultation with affected residents has taken place and feedback in opposition of the proposed stops was received (refer Feedback Spreadsheet Attachment 9) Environment Canterbury are in support of these proposals Parking Enforcement are in support of these proposals Part 1, Clause 5 of the Christchurch City Council Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2008 provides the Council with the authority to install parking restrictions by resolution The Community Boards have delegated authority from the Council to exercise the delegations as set out in the Register of Delegations. The list of delegations for the Community Boards includes jurisdiction in this area for this type of resolution Aligns with the Streets and Transport activities by contributing to the Council s Community Outcomes - Safety and Community.

33 15. Cont d The installation of any parking restriction signs and/or markings must comply with the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS 5.1 The estimated cost of these proposals is $16,000 and will be met from existing budgets. 6. STAFF RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Riccarton/Wigram Community Board resolve to: Caulfield Avenue Stop 6.1 Revoke all existing parking restrictions on the south western side of Caulfield Avenue commencing at a point 166 metres north west of its intersection with Murphys Road and extending in a north westerly direction for a distance of 41 metres. 6.2 Approve that a marked bus stop be installed on the south western side of Caulfield Avenue commencing at a point 166 metres north west of its intersection with Murphys Road and extending in a north westerly direction for a distance of 41 metres. Hamill Road Stops 6.3 Revoke all existing parking restrictions on the north side of Hamill Road commencing at a point 97 east of its intersection with John Annan Street and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 22 metres. 6.4 Approve that a marked bus stop be installed on the north side of Hamill Road commencing at a point 97 east of its intersection with John Annan Street and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 22 metres. 6.5 Revoke all existing parking restrictions on the south side of Hamill Road commencing at a point 57 east of its intersection with Graycliffe Street and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 20 metres. 6.6 Approve that a marked bus stop be installed on the south side of Hamill Road commencing at a point 57 east of its intersection with Graycliffe Street and extending in an easterly direction for a distance of 20 metres. Corsair Drive Stops (Pair 1) 6.7 Revoke all existing parking restrictions on the north eastern side of Corsair Drive commencing at a point 55 metres north west of its intersection with Harvard Avenue and extending in a north westerly direction for a distance of 26 metres. 6.8 Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north eastern side of Corsair Drive commencing at a point 55 metres north west of its intersection with Harvard Avenue and extending in a north westerly direction for a distance of four metres. 6.9 Approve that a marked bus stop be installed on the north eastern side of Corsair Drive commencing at a point 59 metres north west of its intersection with Harvard Avenue and extending in a north westerly direction for a distance of 14 metres Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the north eastern side of Corsair Drive commencing at a point 73 metres north west of its intersection with Harvard Avenue and extending in a north westerly direction for a distance of eight metres.

34 15. Cont d Corsair Drive Stops (Pair 2) 6.11 Revoke all existing parking restrictions on the north eastern side of Corsair Drive commencing at a point 330 metres south east of its intersection with Harvard Avenue and extending in a south easterly direction for a distance of 21 metres Approve that a marked bus stop be installed on the north eastern side of Corsair Drive commencing at a point 330 metres south east of its intersection with Harvard Avenue and extending in a south easterly direction for a distance of 21 metres Revoke all existing parking restrictions on the south western side of Corsair Drive commencing at a point 24 metres south east of its intersection with Gallaghan Close and extending in a south easterly direction for a distance of 14 metres Approve that a marked bus stop be installed on the south western side of Corsair Drive commencing at a point 24 metres south east of its intersection with Gallaghan Close and extending in a south easterly direction for a distance of 14 metres. The Runway (Pair 1) 6.15 Revoke all existing parking restrictions on the south eastern side of The Runway commencing at a point 44 metres south west of its intersection with Deal Street and extending in a south westerly direction for a distance of 16 metres Approve that a marked bus stop be installed on the south eastern side of The Runway commencing at a point 44 metres south west of its intersection with Deal Street and extending in a south westerly direction for a distance of 16 metres Revoke all existing parking restrictions on the north western side of The Runway commencing at a point 18 metres north east of its intersection with Keene Street and extending in a north easterly direction for a distance of 22 metres Approve that a marked bus stop be installed on the north western side of The Runway commencing at a point 18 metres north east of its intersection with Keene Street and extending in a north easterly direction for a distance of 22 metres. The Runway (Pair 2) 6.19 Revoke all existing parking restrictions on the south eastern side of The Runway commencing at a point 24 metres south west of its intersection with Auster Avenue and extending in a south westerly direction for a distance of 24 metres Approve that a marked bus stop be installed on the south eastern side of The Runway commencing at a point 24 metres south west of its intersection with Auster Avenue and extending in a south westerly direction for a distance of 24 metres Revoke all existing parking restrictions on the north western side of The Runway commencing at a point 73 metres north east of its intersection with Dalwood Drive and extending in a north easterly direction for a distance of 21 metres Approve that a marked bus stop be installed on the north western side of The Runway commencing at a point 73 metres north east of its intersection with Dalwood Drive and extending in a north easterly direction for a distance of 21 metres.

35 15. Cont d Wharenui Road (Pair 1) 6.23 Revoke all existing parking restrictions on the western side of Wharenui Road commencing at its intersection with Riccarton Road and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 60 metres Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the western side of Wharenui Road commencing at its intersection with Riccarton Road and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 38 metres Approve that a marked bus stop be installed on the western side of Wharenui Road commencing at a point 38 metres south of its intersection with Riccarton Road and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 14 metres Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the western side of Wharenui Road commencing at a point 52 metres south of its intersection with Riccarton Road and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of eight metres Revoke all existing parking restrictions on the eastern side of Wharenui Road commencing at a point 66 metres south of its intersection with Riccarton Road and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 26 metres Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the eastern side of Wharenui Road commencing at a point 66 metres south of its intersection with Riccarton Road and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of eight metres Approve that a marked bus stop be installed on the eastern side of Wharenui Road commencing at a point 74 metres south of its intersection with Riccarton Road and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of 14 metres Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the eastern side of Wharenui Road commencing at a point 88 metres south of its intersection with Riccarton Road and extending in a southerly direction for a distance of four metres. Wharenui Road (Pair 2) 6.31 Revoke all existing parking restrictions on the western side of Wharenui Road commencing at its intersection with Janet Street and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 31 metres Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the western side of Wharenui Road commencing at its intersection with Janet Street and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 13 metres Approve that a marked bus stop be installed on the western side of Wharenui Road commencing at a point 13 metres north of its intersection with Janet Street and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 14 metres Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the western side of Wharenui Road commencing at a point 27 metres north its intersection with Janet Street and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of four metres Revoke all existing parking restrictions on the eastern side of Wharenui Road commencing at its intersection with Puna Street and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 38 metres.

36 15. Cont d Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the eastern side of Wharenui Road commencing at its intersection with Puna Street and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 16 metres Approve that a marked bus stop be installed on the eastern side of Wharenui Road commencing at a point 16 metres north of its intersection with Puna Street and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of 14 metres Approve that the stopping of vehicles be prohibited at any time on the eastern side of Wharenui Road commencing at a point 30 metres north of its intersection with Puna Street and extending in a northerly direction for a distance of eight metres.

37 ATTACHMENT 1 TO CLAUSE 15

38 - 38 ATTACHMENT 2 TO CLAUSE 15

39 ATTACHMENT 3 TO CLAUSE 15

40 ATTACHMENT 4 TO CLAUSE 15

41 ATTACHMENT 5 TO CLAUSE 15

42 ATTACHMENT 6 TO CLAUSE 15

43 - 43 ATTACHMENT 7 TO CLAUSE 15

44 - 44 ATTACHMENT 8 TO CLAUSE 15

45 ATTACHMENT 9 TO CLAUSE 15 Submission No. Street No Bus Stop Location Street Name Wards Supports No Comment Opposes Comment 143 Aston Dve Bur/Peg No comments received Bower Ave Bower Ave Bur/Peg 1 Bur/Peg 1 I wonder if anyone has walked down this Avenue to view the proposed stop for this would be a unsafe spot. It is already a challenge getting a good view down the street from 509 Bower Ave to enable you to exit the property safely. There is an island in the middle of the road very close to where this new bus stop is supposed to go. As well as the island there is a large growth of flax plants on the footpath side of the island. If the bus stop is placed outside 511 there will then be poor visibility in both directions which inevitably is going to result in vehicle crashes. The other thing I do not think has been considered is the view from the property you are proposing to place the bus stop in front of for it has an open front yard which will now be a bus if one is parked there. I'm guessing this spot was chosen because there is a street lamp there. There are properties in the street which have garages on the front of their properties, surely one of these would be more suitable. I hope you will consider this option before someone gets injured due to poor visibility due to a stopped bus. I would suggest that for safety reasons alone the new bus stops should be placed in he middle between the Broadhaven Rd roundabout, North end on Bower Ave & the island (Forest Park) South end of Bower Ave. We object to this proposal. We want to speak to elected members, if this bus stop is not placed elsewhere. We request a written response to this at least two weeks before the 17th November. We seek to meet CCC staff in person on site and engage, prior to this 'decision' being ratified. We have an un-interrupted line of sight to the proposed location. We have an open plan aspect to the berm (no fence) and our property would be significantly devalued by the current proposal to install a bus stop outside our property. Bus patrons will litter which will blow onto our property. There are far better locations in the immediate locale with lesser impact to homeowners. EQC and insurers need to carry out major repairs requiring storage on the roadside around Dec April It is better to put bus stops opposite one another to minimise environmental impact as in has been done consistently down the remainder of Bower Ave, Queens Park Dve and many streets in the locale. 517 Bower Ave has a fence to half its adjoining elevation, so would not suffer the same visual impact for passengers would be out of immediate sight, their boundary fence would reduce litter transfer qnd the bus stops would then be opposite each other. Other properties are 503 and 505 being well set back from the road. A planted area can be easily adapted to site a bus stop immediately adjacent and also offers good screening. The residents here would suffer significantly lower visual and environmental impact than other options. The road is in appalling condition and a decent, safe, surface should firstly be made before any regular heavy traffic is introduced. The current road surface exacerbates noise and vibration from heavy vehicles. Project team response This pair on Bower Avenue will be installed as temporary stops (just a sign and no road markings) staff will seek alternative locations after further consultation. This pair on Bower Avenue will be installed as temporary stops (just a sign and no road markings) staff will seek alternative locations after further consultation.

46 ATTACHMENT 9 TO CLAUSE 15 CONT D Bower Ave Bur/Peg See attached photograph showing flooding that occurs at 528 Bower Ave. There are a number of aspects to be reconsidered in the positioning of this Bus Stop. Safety when turning into 528 Bower travelling south the road narrows and vehicles break or swerve suddenly, this will add another dimension with more pedestrians walking along the footpath or crossing Bower Ave plus the planting in front of 530 Bower Ave is quite dense and if exiting the driveway, vision will be reduced further with a Bus parked on one side and vegetation on the other. Bower Ave endured a significant amount of liquefaction and damage to the road and infrastructure, particularly outside 519 Bower Ave, as a result we know there will be significant road works at this location and question how a Bus Stop will also be accommodated? This section of Bower Ave, as a result of the earthquakes, is in a slight dish with high points both north and south of 519 & 528 Bower Ave. The result is significant flooding from kerb to kerb when it rains. Pedestrians certainly would not want to cross or potentially get off the bus at this point until stormwater repairs have been completed. Residents at 528 Bower Ave are re-designing the way the garage is facing. This means the driveway will be repositioned and will meet Bower Ave precisely where the proposed Bus Stop is situated. No.528 Bower Ave operates a small Child minding service and parents regularly drop off and pick up their children. The Bus Stop would cause parking issues directly outside their house. We note the Council has a number of considerations when choosing the location of a Bus Stop; we have listed these with comments as to whether the proposed Bus Stop meets the criteria: Maximise the catchment area - Where possible, bus stops should be located near to or at the intersection with a side street, to decrease the distance that bus passengers living on side streets need to walk. There are no side streets for increased catchment here. When maximising the catchment walkways, parks and public spaces give pedestrian mid-block access to a wider catchment area. - There are none adjacent. A bus stop should be located as close as possible to all major attractions and people generators. - There are none here There is concern over a safety issue with Bower Ave narrowing just before the proposed site thus limiting visibility of pedestrians. The population density and building development demographic is mostly mature with few families needing Bus transportation. There is sufficient detail on the new Bus Route as to distance between Bus Stops and wonder if it bebetter located closer to other side streets. Visibility is important for pedestrian/motor vehicle safety to avoid conflicts. The stop location is of major concern due to visibility with the road narrowing and planting to beautify will block traffic view of pedestrians, when just 50 meters further along this is not such an issue. Bus stop locations should consider the need for infrastructure, the ease of implementation and the permanency of the bus stop location. With the possible repositioning of the driveway it would limit the scope for the Bus Stop's future development. With the possible new driveway location there will not be a kerb for pasengers to alight on. This pair on Bower Avenue will be installed as temporary stops (just a sign and no road markings) staff will seek alternative locations after further consultation.

47 Bus stops should be located adjacent to pedestrian crossing facilities. There are no pedestrian crossings on Bower Ave There is little need to have a Bus Stop in this location due to demographics and small catchment as there are no side streets or attractions nearby. The greatest concerns over this location are: Possible new driveway location for 528 Bower Ave Poor visibility for traffic travelling south towards the proposed site as the street narrows and has vegetation. Concern with visibility for residents entering and exiting their driveway with the narrowing of Bower Ave (to the north), Pedestrians exiting the Bus and the Bus itself (south of this property) To summarise we firmly believe that the proposed location does not fit many of the criteria that the Council itself considers when locating a Bus Stop, but in addition we feel that the location will cause issues of safety for commuters, pedestrians and traffic due to a number of factors including visibility, new driveway location, flooding and future repairs to the infrastructure. ATTACHMENT 9 TO CLAUSE 15 CONT D Inwoods Rd Inwoods Rd Lower Styx Rd Lower Styx Rd Bur/Peg Bur/Peg Bur/Peg 1 Bur/Peg 1 No comments received No comments received Vehicles U turn right where the bus stop is proposed when coming from Hawkins and wanting to proceed south along Marshland Rd as there is no right turn out of Hawkins. Why are these bus stops needed, and where are the before and after stops located? There is a project under way to signalise this intersection scheduled for construction June - November These bus stops will be too close to the intersection but if we put in temporary ones then we can locate permanent ones further away as part of the project. See scheme plan 14/ There is a project under way to signalise this intersection scheduled for construction June - November These bus stops will be too close to the intersection but if we put in temporary ones then we can locate permanent ones further away

48 ATTACHMENT 9 TO CLAUSE 15 CONT D as part of the project. See scheme plan 14/ A Queenspa rk Drive Apsley Dve Harewood Rd Harewood Rd (125 Waimakari ri Rd) Bromley Rd Bur/Peg Fen/Wai 1 Fen/Wai 1 Fen/Wai 1 Hag/Fer No comments received The proposed bus stop location does not leave any room for cars to park between it and Woodbury St. There is more space further north, 6 M or in the middle of the block. This location creates a blind spot. Nearby parking is available down Ansonby St, outside the park, and futher up Apsley Drive. The school is very concerned about the proposed locations for the bus stops outside our school. Only one family intermittently using the bus service at present is leaving our school at the end of the term. While we support bus transport, our concerns are the bus stops proximity to school access, the proposed median strip, and intersection and reduced visibility for the road patrol. A reduction in parking, in an area that is already congested at the end of each school day is also a huge concern to consider so that the other road users are not negatively impacted. NZTA have plans for altering the area outside our school to make crossing the road safer, including putting a median strip in the middle of the road we are unsure if this has been considered in the placement decisions. I may need to request speaking rights at the meetings in November. Why were we not informed through the normal channels? We are losing car parking space with the new Russley Rd roundabout and proposed cycle crossing and now this! We have no onsite car parking and our parents need parking space close by as they all have infants and pre-schoolers. We have already tried to get the speed limit down but were unsuccessful now it appears you are going to make everyone park either down Waimakariri Rd which requires crossing Harewood Rd or much further down Harewood Rd where the only access out of cars is onto the road or down an incline to the footpath. This is a 70km road. No comments received On Park frontage. The CCC Parking Strategy prioritises kerbspace for use as bus stops above all other parking needs. The concerns expressed about the access out of cars and the speed of the road is also applicable to bus passengers. The positioning of the stops has been chosen to reflect this, due to the demand generators of two churches, school and playschool. The proposed stops provide full height sealed access to footpath with a crossing point nearby. The concerns expressed about the access out of cars and the speed of the road is also applicable to bus passengers. The positioning of the stops has been chosen to reflect this, due to the demand generators of two churches, school and playschool. The proposed stops provide full height sealed access to footpath with a crossing point nearby.

49 ATTACHMENT 9 TO CLAUSE 15 CONT D Bromley Rd Hag/Fer Thanks for taking the time to explain the bus stop proposal to me. I have looked up the bus route and talked with some people who use our centre. We would like the council to please consider moving the bus stop down the road towards the corner of Maces Road or have it before the corner of Raymond Road (I think it used to be here so it may be easier to reinstate it) as at the moment it will be situated where people park their cars to use our centre. The car park is often full and people use the area outside the centre to park. Quite a few of our clients are older and have disabilities. They find it an easier walk in from the road directly outside. There are over 3,000 people using our centre annually with about 17 regular groups using it at night etc. Up to 70 people attend. Having the bus stop as it is proposed will mean they will have to walk further at night and won t feel as safe. Our lighting is good at the front of the centre. Another consideration is a personal disability of mine. I manage the centre and have worked here for over 9 years. I have acutely hypersensitive hearing which was caused by a trauma to my ears. This means I find loud noise very painful. I also suffer from tinnitus which is made worse by loud noise. I cannot use public transport or walk near roads. Having a bus stopping right outside my workplace would be stressful to me and may mean I cannot work here anymore. PS A woman who lives just where the bus stop used to be on Bromley Road uses a mobility scooter but hardly goes out now as her scooter is no good if rain is threatening because of the battery. She would be able to access the bus if it were where it used to be. On Park/Community frontage. Placing Bus Stops outside Community Centres is best practice and this stop (on the Community Centre side of road) can be relocated along the frontage to mitigate the concerns of the submitter Fitzgerald Ave Hereford St Hereford St Hereford St Hereford St Hereford St Hereford St Hereford St Hag/Fer Hag/Fer 1 Hag/Fer 1 Hag/Fer Hag/Fer Hag/Fer Hag/Fer Hag/Fer No comments received I am very pleased to learn of this proposal and fully support it, as it will also aid public transport, as well as the convenience of the public in regards to the proposed stadium location nearby. I look forward to its progress and work on these bus stops. I have three main objections to the bus stop being placed outside 1-9/265 Hereford St. This area is the most heavily parked area in the street. This is probably due to the 10 units having single garages and hardly any other on-site parking available for residents. Traffic from Barbadoes St turning left into Hereford St would be more hazardous to buses in the proposed location than if the bus stop was located further down Hereford St e.g. outside 275 Hereford St. It is illogical to inconvenience the residents at 265 Hereford St by preventing them and their guests from parking directly outside their residence when there is a property nearby that operates as a business with off-street parking available (275 Hereford St). No comments received No comments received No comments received No comments received No comments received No longer required. The CCC Parking Strategy prioritises kerbspace for use as bus stops above all other parking needs. No longer required. No longer required.

50 A Maces Rd Hag/Fer Maces Rd Hag/Fer The property at 180 Maces Rd is primarily used for manufacturing, storage and distribution by several different tenants, KB Quarries have recently obtained resource consent to store and distribute shingle and aggregate on the front yard but are yet to commence. This will result in over 200 heavy vehicle movements in and out of the main gate at 180 Maces Rd and having the bus stop between the entrances to 180 and 170 maces will lead to congestion, confusion and ultimately accidents. The same could be said for locating the one across the road so close to Lupins Lane which is also a busy industrial way. Both bus stops should be moved further north up Maces Rd for safety reasons and ease of use by commuters. As no further consultation is necessary to relocate the eastern stop (outside 180) it can be relocated northwards to mitigate owners concerns. The stop opposite on the west side (outside 173A) will remain in proposed place as it will act as a clearway for most of the time when a bus isn't present. As no further consultation is necessary to relocate the eastern stop (outside 180) it can be relocated northwards to mitigate owners concerns. The stop opposite on the west side (outside 173A) will remain in proposed place as it will act as a clearway for most of the time when a bus isn't present. 60 Ruru Rd Hag/Fer No comments received On Park frontage. 61 Ruru Rd Hag/Fer No comments received On Park frontage. 22 Tanner St Hag/Fer No comments received 53 Tanner St Hag/Fer No comments received Caulfield Ave Corsair Dve Ric/Wig 1 Ric/Wig 1 Have looked over the bus stop positions and they look fine. Thank you for asking us. Have looked over the bus stop positions and they look fine. Thank you for asking us. ATTACHMENT 9 TO CLAUSE 15 CONT D On Park frontage. On Park frontage.

51 ATTACHMENT 9 TO CLAUSE 15 CONT D Corsair Dve Corsair Dve Corsair Dve Corsair Dve (10 Christie Ln) Ric/Wig 1 Ric/Wig 1 Ric/Wig Ric/Wig We understand the need for bus stops on Corsair Drive, as Wigram grows, however we strongly object to the above proposal for the following reasons: We have 2 young boys, aged 3 and 5 years who often plays outside the house and we are concerned about their safety, ie from bus and strangers. The proposed bus stop is extremely close to the front French window of our family room, it will intrude into our privacy with passengers waiting for buses and the noises of the buses stopping and starting can be very disruptive. We have had previous negative experiences where passengers leave litter lying around the bus stop and a few years ago, my husband was assaulted at a bus stop. This still has negative impacts on his mental health up until today. We are also very concerned about the increasing traffic in the morning, queuing from the traffic lights at the junction of Springs road and Corsair Drive. The bus stop location may further disrupt the traffic flow. My son suffers from asthma and we are concerned that the toxic exhaust pollution from the frequent stops and pick ups will aggravate his condition. He has had hospital admission previously. The bus stop should be located further down the road outside Corsair Drive, which is about 3 minutes walking distance. The reason is because this is a non residential section/property and will cause minimal disruption to residents. Furthermore, this is adjacent to the ABC preschool, Christchurch branch for NZ Cadet Forces and Ngai Tahu Property office. This will more likely have a better catchment and reduce intrusion to residents on Corsair Drive. We object to the bus stop outside our properties. When we leave for work in the morning we have a long wait for a break in the traffic as the vehicles build up from the traffic lights at Springs Rd. Having buses amongst the traffic is going to make it virtually impossible. They should move it back to the alleyway at 22 Corsair Dve. No comments received No comments received The stop on the southern side will be installed as temporary (just a sign and no road markings). Staff will investigate and consult on relocating over alleyway between No.s 20 and 24 The stop on the southern side will be installed as temporary (just a sign and no road markings). Staff will investigate and consult on relocating over alleyway between No s 20 and 24. Undeveloped

52 ATTACHMENT 9 TO CLAUSE 15 CONT D We have no issue with a bus route in our street, we do have some concerns with regard to the location of the stops. Firstly we have 4 children under the age of 10 and I feel a frequent bus could be a serious hazard as the children like to play out the front of the house everyday. We have only been in the home for 2 ½ weeks and one of the main reasons we purchased it was because of the on street parking outside. We have 4 vehicles some of which need to be parked outside our property. My partner also has competition race vehicles & trailers which are quite frequently in & out of the garage and driveway and quite frankly having a bus stopped outside every minutes is going to be a nightmare. There are show 3 42 Hamill Rd Ric/Wig 1 homes across the street also and the bays get very busy especially in the weekends and we are not going to park our own vehicles and visitors vehicles around the corner out of our sight. Where it is proposed at present affects 3 driveways on a very regular basis and when parked is going to be over one driveway either ours or # 44. The next bay along just before Graycliffe Street corner on the left would seem to us to be a much better spot as it does not affect any driveway as the house on the corner has its driveway on the other street front not on Hamill Road as the map we received states. The property is also fully fenced. We would appreciate it if these issues could be taken into consideration and if the stop is moved further along the road it would be greatly appreciated. 49 Hamill Rd Ric/Wig No comments received The Have looked over the bus stop positions and they look fine. Ric/Wig 1 Runway Thank you for asking us. We suggest the bus stop go outside 26 and 28 The Runway because 26 The Runway is occupied by an office building for the subdivision and 28 is a new show home that undoubtedly will not have occupiers permanently living at this address for at 1 20 least a couple of years. The considerations of permanent The Ric/Wig 1 residents need to be taken into first consideration on this Runway occasion. Please amend the proposed bus stop location accordingly The Runway The Runway (15 Lightbody Ln) Wharenui Rd Wharenui Rd Ric/Wig 1 Ric/Wig Ric/Wig 1 Ric/Wig 1 Have looked over the bus stop positions and they look fine. Thank you for asking us. We are tenants at 17 Lightbody Lane Wigram, and have recently learnt that there is to be a bus stop located outside the property. Could you please advise if any one involved in this decision has physically visited the site. We are very concerned at the lack of distance between the location of the bus stop and the front of the house. The noise and invasion of privacy, and, lack of parking space. Good afternoon. Thank you for your letter dated 15 September We support your proposal With the change in route these bus stops are certainly the best option for the school. I see no need for us to address the Board meeting unless there are objections that would change the location. The CCC Parking Strategy prioritises kerbspace for use as bus stops above all other parking needs. The proposal using this bay makes the turn into Graycliffe Street achievable for buses, the other bay is too close to Graycliffe Street to be useable. On Park frontage. After confirming with Ngai Tahu Property this bay was always designated as a bus stop and was sold as such with it being shown on sales material so bus stop should be installed here. Undeveloped The CCC Parking Strategy prioritises kerbspace for use as bus stops above all other parking needs. Staff have visited the site, the layout of The Runway means all car parking and bus stops must be installed within the bays provided.

53 ATTACHMENT 9 TO CLAUSE 15 CONT D Wharenui Rd Wharenui Rd Wharenui Rd Ric/Wig 1 Ric/Wig 1 Ric/Wig With the change in route these bus stops are certainly the best option for the school. I see no need for us to address the Board meeting unless there are objections that would change the location. The proposed bus stop outside 5 & 7 Wharenui Rd directly impacts the flow of traffic and customer parking access and availability to ILAM Toyota. We are an extremely busy operation and parking is a premium at the best of times. This proposal would remove at least 8 parking spots in close proximity and would impact on the operational access to ILAM Toyota. Secondly it would cause further congestion to an already busy intersection and collector route. Traffic flow at peak time should be analysed. Buses stopped here would block a really busy Riccarton Rd intersection and delay traffic movement as well as block access into the business and cause delays for clients trying to exit from our operation. Thirdly you have pedestrian safety to consider when exiting a bus stop and walking past a busy workshop operation with multiple movements in and out on a daily basis. Lastly, the dealership operation also has vehicle transporters delivering vehicles as well as oil delivery trucks which park outside the dealership gates and would block access to the bus stop. These are some of the few reasons why this is not a suitable proposal and will directly impact our business operation which has been in operation since 1987 in its current form. We are going to build a new house at 5 Wharenui Rd and about to lodge the building consent application. Approved PIM includes widening existing crossing and constructing an additional vehicle crossing at the south boundary. The proposed new bus stop shown in the letter (map attached), will block our new crossing at south. Is it possible to: Adjust the 14 meters long stop at No.7 and no stopping dashed line in front of No.5? or, if it cannot be adjusted can we still have our approved second crossing? there is very little chance for our car to meet the bus at same time. Bus stop needs to be located close to Riccarton Road due to catchment (school). Will not impact access to ILAM Toyota, bus stop is on departure side of their access, their customer parking is on their land and any overflow will just have to park further down street. Will only remove 3 car parks on eastern side of street as start of stop is over driveway. Road is wide enough for traffic to pass a stopped bus so won't slow traffic flow. Pedestrian safety - the "busy workshop operation" will have to give way to pedestrians as its a footpath. There shouldn't be any trucks blocking access to the bus stop as it's no stopping all the way behind the stop. The resident directly affected at number 5 is ok with the proposed stop. The CCC Parking Strategy prioritises kerb space for use as bus stops above all other parking needs. We can move stop south a couple of metres to give passengers a full height kerb to step out onto. Not a problem if bus stop is over driveway, so will proceed in this location.

54 ATTACHMENT 9 TO CLAUSE 15 CONT D Wharenui Rd Wharenui Rd Wharenui Rd Burnbrae St Burnbrae St Ric/Wig 1 Ric/Wig 1 Ric/Wig 1 Spr/Hea 1 Spr/Hea I would like to discuss the issue of setting a bus stop front of my house with someone from the Council. Im not happy with this idea, it will occupy all my off street parking space, I do believe I have the right on that space. I do not want to lose any on street parking. The bus stop would be better placed by the park at 68 Wharenui Rd. The two house's at 90 Wharenui Rd have 6 bedrooms each (12 in total). Nearly all of the occupants of the house's own cars, and although a lot of on site parking is provided for the occupants, a number of them still have to use the road to park their cars. Visitors to the house's also park on the road outside 90 Wharenui Rd. If the bus stop is situated in the proposed position, occupants and visitors will have to park further down the road, or around the corner on Janet Street, which could cause problems e.g. neighbour complaints, and security issues. Please position it outside a property belonging to someone who doesn't have a drivers licence. Long term problems may arise if the bus stop is positioned outside 90 Wharenui Rd. Our objection is based on the following factors:it is already difficult to get into and out of our drive ways. When exiting our drive ways one has split seconds in which to make a decision, by which a car from another direction is already approaching. Having a bus parked there will obscure our view, as well blocking our way in or out as cars back up behind the bus.bus stops usually involve a kerb extension to bring the footpath out to the edge of the roadway, which will involve the removal of some parking space. These stops are very convenient for the bus passengers and drivers but cause traffic to queue behind the stopped bus. This type of bus stop would block a marked cycle lane.tennyson St has a dedicated bike lane, and thus by implication, Burnbrae St becomes an extension of this bike lane. It is a major cycle commuter route (including students) and having buses parked there will force cyclists into the middle of the road putting them at risk to following and oncoming traffic.at peak times traffic already builds up back on Burnbrae St from St Martins Rd to Eastern Tce. Having a bus stopping in front of number 11, will worsen the situation.a bus turning left from Burnbrae into St Martins Rd will take up both lanes, which will add to congestion. Locating bus stops near to intersections involve traffic management issues that should be considered. The CCC Parking Strategy prioritises kerb space for use as bus stops above all other parking needs. The CCC Parking Strategy prioritises kerb space for use as bus stops above all other parking needs. The CCC Parking Strategy prioritises kerb space for use as bus stops above all other parking needs. Road is wide enough for cars to pass a stopped bus so there shouldn't be cars backed up behind bus. A bus only stops for seconds, so it just needs resident to wait until it has gone to exit driveway. No kerb works are proposed as part of this installation and there is no cycle lane on Burnbrae St. If people are sitting on wall a bus seat can be installed. Cyclists have the choice of whether to wait for bus to leave stop or check it's clear and overtake bus as happens all around the city. The CCC Parking Strategy prioritises kerbspace for use as bus stops above all other parking needs. This has been approved by the Area Engineer so traffic issues are not

55 ATTACHMENT 9 TO CLAUSE 15 CONT D expected as a result of the proposals Curries Have looked over the bus stop positions and they look fine. Spr/Hea 1 Rd Thank you for asking us. 34 Curries No comments received Spr/Hea Rd 38 Moorhous No comments received Spr/Hea e Ave 17 General 1 Looks good to me. Totals 1 Note: Submissions No.5,9,14, submitted on more than bus stop. On Park frontage.

56 WATERLOO ROAD - HORNBY SCHOOLS - VARIABLE SPEED LIMIT Executive Leadership Team Member responsible: Officer responsible: Author: General Manager, Culture, Leisure and Parks Unit Manager, Transport and City Streets Michael Thomson, Senior Traffic Engineer Contact Contact Details N N Y DDI PURPOSE AND ORIGIN OF REPORT 1.1 The purpose of this report is to request that the Riccarton/Wigram Community Board endorse the installation of a new variable speed limit (40 kilometres per hour school speed zone) on Waterloo Road at Hornby Primary School and Hornby High School (refer Attachment 1), and that the Board recommend to the Council that it approve the new variable speed limit and include it in the Christchurch City Council Register of Speed Limits. 1.2 This is a staff initiated report as these schools have reached top priority on the Council approved school zone priority process for a 40 kilometres per hour school zone from the Council approved 2014/15 budget. 2. BACKGROUND 2.1 The Council has a commitment to improve road safety. Reducing excessive vehicle speeds, where appropriate, outside schools during peak arrival and departure periods improves safety for children. The Council has a programme of installing 40 kilometres per hour variable speed limits (known as School Speed Zones ) outside schools according to a prioritisation process. This process, including the methodology behind it, was endorsed on 25 August 2011 by the Council as the most appropriate method of improving road safety outside certain schools. 2.2 The two adjoining Hornby schools currently have the highest priority for the installation of a variable speed limit. Note: The former Branston Intermediate School has been incorporated into the two schools site, forming the Hornby School Hub. To date, 41 schools in Christchurch have benefited from the installation of a school speed zone. 2.3 The effect of the relocation of Branston Intermediate students to the site has been the increase of students needing to cross Waterloo Road. This road experiences a high use by heavy vehicles, particularly truck and trailer units. 2.4 This project aligns with the Christchurch Transport Strategic Plan COMMENT 3.1 The school speed zone can operate on school days for a period of no more than 35 minutes in the morning before the start of school, and for a period of no more than 20 minutes in the afternoon, beginning no earlier than five minutes before the end of school. The school speed zone can also operate for a period of 10 minutes at any other time when children cross the road, or enter/leave vehicles at the roadside. 3.2 The Council can resolve to set new variable speed limits in accordance with the Christchurch City Council Speed Limits Bylaw and the Land Transport Rule: Setting of Speed Limits Accordingly, infrastructure for these variable speed limits cannot be commissioned until they have been formally resolved by the Council.

57 16. Cont d The proposed variable speed limit complies with the conditions specified and published by the Director of the New Zealand Transport Agency in the New Zealand Gazette (21/4/2011, No. 55, p. 1284) approving a variable speed limit of 40 kilometres per hour in school zones, and setting out conditions for those speed limits. A copy of that notice is attached (refer Attachment 2). A Council resolution is required to implement the speed limit restrictions and any traffic management changes required. 3.4 The proposed variable speed limit also complies with the Land Transport Rules- Setting of Speed Limits: 2003, Traffic Control Devices: 2004, and the Christchurch City Council Speed Limits Bylaw Before the Council can set a variable speed limit pursuant to Clause 5(1) of the Christchurch City Speed Limits Bylaw 2010, the public consultation requirements set out in Section 7.1 of the Land Transport Rule Setting of Speed Limits 2003 Rule must be complied with. Section 7.1(2) provides that the persons who must be consulted before the Council sets a speed limit are: (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) Road controlling authorities that are responsible for roads that join, or are near, the road on which the speed limit is to be set or changed; A territorial authority that is affected by the existing or proposed speed limit; Any local community that the road controlling authority considers to be affected by the proposed speed limit; The Commissioner of Police; The Chief Executive Officer of the New Zealand Automobile Association Incorporated; The Chief Executive Officer of the Road Transport Forum New Zealand; Other organisations or road user groups that the road controlling authority considers to be affected by the proposed speed limit; and The Director of Land Transport New Zealand now the New Zealand Transport Agency (NZTA). 3.6 Section 7.1(3) of the Rule provides: (a) A road controlling authority must consult by writing to the persons in 7.1(2) advising them of the proposed speed limit and giving them a reasonable time, which must be specified in the letter, to make submissions on the proposal. In terms of Section 7.1(2)(a) and 7.1(2)(b) there are no road controlling authorities or territorial authorities that are required to be consulted in respect of any of the proposed variable speed limits. 3.7 Representatives of the Commissioner of Police, the Director of NZTA, the Chief Executive Officer of the New Zealand Automobile Association Incorporated, and the Chief Executive Officer of the Road Transport Forum of New Zealand have received written advice of the proposed new variable speed limit in accordance with Section 7.1(2) (d), (e), (f) and (h). No other organisation or road user group is considered to be affected by the proposed speed limits. No neighbouring road controlling authority is affected. 3.8 The Hornby Primary School s Board of Trustees endorse the proposed School Speed Zone. The Principal of Hornby High School also supports this proposal. 3.9 A memorandum was sent to the Riccarton/Wigram Community Board on 30 September 2014 advising them that the Council was proposing to consult on a 40 kilometres per hour variable speed limit outside the Hornby Schools The following week notices about the proposed Hornby Schools speed zone were delivered to residents and nearby businesses, and posted to absentee owners whose properties were affected by proposed signage. Information was also circulated within the school community.

58 16. Cont d The publicity leaflet, with consultation plan, was distributed to the community and stakeholders for consultation on 10 October The feedback period closed on 27 October Approximately 160 pamphlets were distributed to businesses, residents, and property owners. One submission was received from an underground service company saying that there was no conflict with any of their services existing or proposed The submitter has received an acknowledgement of their submission and later a second letter was sent giving the outcome of consultation, a summary of the feedback and advice that a report would be presented to this meeting of the Riccarton/Wigram Community Board requesting their approval to install the School Speed Zone. Details of the Board meeting were also provided advising they could attend or address the Board prior to a decision being made. 4. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS 4.1 The estimated cost for this school zone is $30,000 and will be funded from an approved fund for School Speed Zones. 5. STAFF RECOMMENDATION That the Riccarton/Wigram Community Board recommend that the Council approve: 5.1 The installation of a 40 kilometres per hour variable speed limit on Waterloo Road (school zone), as it meets the requirements of Section 7.1 of the Land Transport Setting of Speed Limits Rule 2003, and the New Zealand Gazette notice (21/04/2011, Number 55, page 1284) including the times of operation. 5.2 Subject to the Council approving recommendation 5.1 of this report, that pursuant to Clause 5(1) of the Christchurch City Speed Limits Bylaw 2010, a variable speed limit (40 kilometres per hour School Speed zone) apply on Waterloo Road, commencing at a point 87 metres West of the Carmen Road Intersection and extending in a Westerly direction for a distance of 370 metres. 5.3 Subject to the Council approving recommendations 5.1 and 5.2 of this report, that the variable speed limit specified in recommendations 5.1 and 5.2 shall come into force on completion of infrastructure installation and public notification.

59 ATTACHMENT 1 TO CLAUSE 16

60 ATTACHMENT 2 TO CLAUSE 16

61 COMMUNITY BOARD ADVISER S UPDATE 17.1 UPCOMING BOARD ACTIVITIES The separately circulated memorandum to members refers BOARD FUNDS 2014/15 For information, the attached monthly status update refers TRANSPORT PLANNING IN HALSWELL For the Board s information, the attached staff memorandum refers. STAFF RECOMMENDATION That the Board receive the information in these updates.

62 ATTACHMENT 1 TO CLAUSE 17 Riccarton/Wigram Community Board Funding 2014/ /15 Discretionary Response Fund Allocated $ 51, Jul Transfer to Youth Development Fund $ 7,000 Halswell Residents' Association - design and lighting of the Halswell 15-Jul Cenotaph $ 2,500 Hornby Presbyterian Community Trust - equipment for the Hornby 16-Sep Spring Party $ 500 Riccarton/Wigram 2014/15 Community and Youth Service Awards and Community Garden Pride Awards $ 4, Oct Funds Remaining $ 14,000 $ 37, /15 Youth Development Fund Allocated Funds Remaining 15-Jul Discretionary Response Fund Allocation $ 7, Aug Strengthening Communities Fund Allocation $ 7, Jul Wan Zhi Tay - International Geography Olympiad Competition $ Jul Mary Dewhirst - Internship at the University of Airlangga, Faculty of Psychology in East Java $ Aug Abbas Nazari - Harvard Project for Asia and International Relations Conference in Tokyo, Japan $ Aug Christchurch School of Music - Australian Youth Orchestra Festival in Brisbane (nine students) $ Sep Taane Whakapiri Flanagan - Nga Manu Korero Speech Competition in Napier $ Sep Cameron Avery - Cross Country Championships in New South Wales $ Sep Courtney McGregor - World Gymnastics Championships in China $ Sep Anna Tempero - World Gymnastics Championships in China $ Oct Te Aho - New Zealand Boxing Nationals in Queenstown $ Oct Te Matau - New Zealand Boxing Nationals in Queenstown $ Oct Hinehau Flanagan - New Zealand Boxing Nationals in Queenstown $ Oct Georgia Taylor - New Zealand National Rhythmic Gymnastics Championships in Auckland $ Oct Paris Taylor - New Zealand National Rhythmic Gymnastics Championships in Auckland $ Oct Anna Taylor - New Zealand National Rhythmic Gymnastics Championships in Auckland $ Oct Millie Williamson - New Zealand Gymnastics Championships in Auckland $ Oct Logan Rupapere - Nga Manu Korero Speak Competition in Napier $ 50 $ 5,150 $ 9,468

63 Christchurch City Council City Environment Group ATTACHMENT 2 TO CLAUSE 17 Memorandum Date: 31 October 2014 From: RICHARD HOLLAND To: RICCARTON/WIGRAM COMMUNITY BOARD cc: Peter Dow Community Board Adviser (for distribution) Attachments: 1. Plan of transport planning projects proposed in Halswell (TRIM 14/ ) TRANSPORT PLANNING IN HALSWELL Purpose of this Memo: To provide the Riccarton/Wigram Community Board with an update on Transport Planning in Halswell. Background: Halswell is identified as a key activity centre in Environment Canterbury s Regional Policy Statement. Key activity centres are defined as commercial centres identified as focal points for employment, community activities, and the transport network, and which are suitable for more intensive mixed-use development. In order to provide appropriate transport infrastructure, the South West Area Plan identified a programme of works that would encourage sustainable development in the south west. Since the earthquakes, there has been accelerated development identified in the south west to meet increased demand for residential and business land-use, which has required a review of the transport infrastructure programme. Information requested: Through the Board, the Halswell Residents Association have requested information on current transport planning programmes for the south west with a focus on Halswell Road, Nicholls Road and Halswell Junction Road. Whilst Halswell Road is a State Highway and any works on that road are the responsibility of the New Zealand Transport Agency, a full update on future works planned on Halswell Road, Nicholls Road and Halswell Junction Road is provided in attachment 1 (the numbers below correspond to the plan). Works include:

64 ATTACHMENT 2 TO CLAUSE 17 CONT D Dunbars Road (Classification: Collector Road) 1. A new crossing is being investigated to assist children crossing Dunbars Road at Oaklands School. Once the investigations are complete, the works will be prioritised along with other requests for school crossing facilities. Halswell Road (Classification: NZTA State Highway) 2. Proposed Intersection Improvement: Halswell/Dunbars likely to be a new access to the new landuse proposed called North Halswell in the District Plan Review. 3. Proposed Intersection Improvement: Augustine/Halswell likely to be a new access to the new landuse proposed called North Halswell in the District Plan Review. 4. Road widening: Halswell Road (and Lincoln Road) it has been determined that road widening is not likely to be required until demand from major local developments (particularly the Halswell Key Activity Centre and land-use change at North Halswell) require additional network capacity in this area. The investigation/ project teams from both NZTA and CCC will continue to monitor the need for any widening works, which may include PT Priority infrastructure. 5. Halswell Library: Pedestrian Crossing Islands the new development of the library has identified one new crossing point and one relocated crossing point to assist pedestrians accessing the new facilities. These are now in place. 6. Changes to the drop off area and bus stop location are being addressed at the end of the year to improve accessibility to Halswell School. This proposal has been through the Board for approval and a further review of the Kea crossing along with the school speed zone will be undertaken as part of the school safety/travel planning process. Nicholls Road (Classification: Local Road) 7. Bus Stop: new markings of the bus stop on Nicholls Road have been completed. 8. New Kerb and Channel has been constructed on the north east side of Nicholls Road. Halswell Junction Road (Classification: Minor Arterial) 9. Pedestrian Crossing Island: a new crossing island has been proposed south of the Nicholls intersection with Halswell Junction Road and will be constructed in the next six months. 10. Intersection Upgrades: works associated with the new residential land-use around Whincops Road are being constructed. Sparks Road (Classification: Minor Arterial) 11. A new shared path to allow better access to Halswell Road and the local facilities is proposed from Garforth Green to Halswell Road (north side of Sparks Road). This proposal has been through the Board for approval. The limited budgets that Council is working to at the moment has meant that the Neighbourhood Improvement Programme and the Street Renewals Programme have been suspended. However, as listed above, due to the development occurring in the south west, there is a significant investment being made in transport infrastructure in and around Halswell. Conclusion: Transport Planning officers will continue to develop network plans based on an integrated approach. The rate at which land-use develops is informing how infrastructure is prioritised in the capital programme through the draft 2015 Long Term Plan and future planning. The draft 2015 Long Term Plan will be sent to Councillors for review in December 2014 and is released for public consultation in March/April Richard Holland TEAM LEADER NETWORK PLANNING TRANSPORT

65 ATTACHMENT 2 TO CLAUSE 17 CONT D