Havasu Wilderness. FWS National Wildlife Refuge System Wilderness Fellows. Kelly L. Lockman. Report on Wilderness Character Monitoring
|
|
- Gary Cox
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 FWS National Wildlife Refuge System Wilderness Fellows Report on Wilderness Character Monitoring Havasu Wilderness Kelly L. Lockman U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service 0/4/20 Havasu NWR Wilderness Character Monitoring Page of 58
2 Table of Contents Havasu National Wildlife Refuge and Wilderness Havasu NWR and Wilderness Background and Setting Havasu NWR and Wilderness Map... 5 Wilderness Resources Wilderness Character Monitoring and Qualities... 6 Documents and Staff Consulted Process Used to Identify Measures... 8 Selected Measures Untrammeled Actions to Manage Native Wildlife... 9 Actions to Suppress Non-Native Species... 0 Percent of Natural Fires Suppressed Averaged Over Wilderness... Number of Hunting Permits... 2 Acres Burned Due to Human Ignited Fires... 3 Other Unauthorized Actions... 4 Natural Desert Bighorn Sheep... 5 Extirpated Plants and Animals... 6 Non-Indigenous Species... 7 Present Nurseries with Myotis velifer... 8 Feral Burro Populations... 9 Present Wildlife Diseases Undeveloped Actions to Cleanup Modern Human Debris... 2 Number of Inactive Mines Index of Authorized Non-Recreational Physical Development Type and Amount Use of Motor Vehicles, Motorized Equipment, and Mechanical Transport Incidents and Known Vehicle Intrusions Number of Management and Other Documented Flyovers Inholdings Acres Disturbances to Cultural Resources Solitude or Primitive and Unconfined Recreation Agency Provided Recreation Facilities Acres of Wilderness Recreational Camping is not Permitted Special Use Permits... 3 Administrative Travel Routes and Access Roads... 3 Miles of Wilderness Boundary Adjacent to Private Lands No Wake Zones in River Channel Adjacent to Wilderness Measures Not Used Conclusions Appendix Cover Photo: Havasu Wilderness - Kelly Lockman Havasu NWR Wilderness Character Monitoring Page 2 of 58
3 Background Havasu National Wildlife Refuge is located on the Colorado River between Needles, CA and Parker, AZ. Havasu Refuge was established by Executive Order 8647 on January 22, 94, to provide migration and wintering habitat for migratory waterfowl. It is essentially an overlay on lands withdrawn and purchased by the Bureau of Reclamation for the operation of Parker Dam and its reservoir, Lake Havasu. The refuge as established encompassed about 43,000 acres and was enlarged to 45,76 acres in 949. With the founding of Lake Havasu City in 964, the refuge was reduced to 22,007 acres under the Lower Colorado River Land Use Plan. This plan delineated a realignment of the refuge boundaries with the major portion of Lake Havasu being deleted for recreational development. In 968, the Needles Peaks area was added to the refuge, bringing the total acreage to 4,495. Four hundred-twenty acres was deleted in 974 and returned to the Chemehuevi Indian Tribe. In October 977,,575 acres were purchased from the Arizona Ranch and Metals Company through the Nature Conservancy as an addition to the Bill Williams Unit. An additional, 2,78 acreas were withdrawn from the Bureau of Land Management in 98 to round out the Bill Williams Unit, bringing the total acreage to 45,43. The refuge contains three district units. The Topock Marsh Unit in South Mohave Valley constitutes all refuge land north of I-40. This unit lies at the south end of a 200,000 acre alluvial basin and contains a 4,000-acre marsh and 200 acres of cropland. The Topock Gorge Unit extends from I-40 south to upper Lake Havasu. This is one of the most scenic features along the Lower Colorado River. Through portions of the Topock Gorge the Colorado is incised between colorful cliffs rising several hundred feet above the river with peaks in this area reaching 2,400 feet. The refuge and the surrounding area contain much evidence of early man, especially in the Topock Gorge. Picture writings on rock and canyon walls, both petrogylphs and pictographs, provide a silent record of the area s earliest inhabitants and their culture. The area was also heavily prospected during the gold boom and several inactive mines are located on the refuge. View of Havasu Wilderness from Colorado River Photo: FWS Havasu NWR Wilderness Character Monitoring Page 3 of 58
4 The refuge is surrounded by areas of recent developmental growth due to recreational amenities provided in and along the Colorado River. Lake Havasu City and Mohave Valley has had rapid population growth since the year of wilderness designation. This places an increasing importance for refuge and wilderness as well as increases the demand on the refuge and its resources. Further pressures have been placed on refuge and wilderness areas due to population growth with Laughlin, NV, Bullhead City, AZ and Needles, CA region as a result of recent gambling/resort businesses. Ecological Setting Havasu National Wildlife Refuge is located in the southern portion of the Mojave Desert. It lies in one of the hottest and driest regions in the United States. Approximately half of the refuge habitat is in this category. The desert washes provide excellent habitat and the Mesquite and Palo Verde dominate above the Salt Cedar moisture elevation. Over 300 species of birds, 42 species of mammals, and 38 species of reptiles have been recorded at Havasu NWR. Annual precipitation averages at 5. inches. Most of the rainfall occurs in the form of thunderstorms in early spring and late summer. These storms are often violent and produce severe washouts in local drainages. The summers are long and extremely hot with maximum temperatures ranging between 5 and 25 degrees Fahrenheit. The winters are short and very mild with a near absence of freezing temperatures. View of Havasu Wilderness Photo: Kelly Lockman Havasu National Wildlife Refuge still remains an oasis for migratory birds even though Salt Cedar continues to be an overpowering problem. The Topock Gorge, the area that is mainly designated wilderness besides the 20 miles of the Colorado River itself represents one of the last remaining natural stretches along this portion of the lower river. The riparian zone is used by a wide variety of songbirds, marsh and wading birds. The emergent vegetation in the backwaters provides nesting habitat as well as nursery areas for largemouth bass, crappie and channel catfish. Havasu NWR Wilderness Character Monitoring Page 4 of 58
5 Map of Havasu Refuge and Wilderness as well as immediate surroundings Source: FWS Havasu NWR Wilderness Character Monitoring Page 5 of 58
6 Wilderness Character Monitoring Havasu National Wildlife Refuge was part of the initial round in a wilderness character monitoring pilot program influenced by the Wilderness Act of 964. Qualities of wilderness character were derived from the Act and this program was implemented to provide a uniform approach to monitoring trends and actions in wildernesses across the nation. Along with 8 other USFWS refuges, wilderness character monitoring measures were created for Havasu National Wildlife Refuge Wilderness using a baseline year of 20. The measures selected for Havasu are specific to this wilderness and unique from any other set of wilderness character monitoring measures. These measures will allow USFWS and interested parties to monitor how the wilderness character will change and trends in the future. Trends in wilderness character monitoring can either be improving, degrading, stable or offsetting stable. Untrammeled Qualities of Wilderness Character...an area where the earth and its community of life are untrammeled by man... and...generally appears to have been affected primarily by the forces of nature Wilderness Act of 964 Wilderness is essentially unhindered and free from the actions of modern human control or manipulation Natural...is protected and managed so as to preserve its natural conditions Wilderness Act of 964 Wilderness ecological systems are substantially free from the effects of modern civilization Undeveloped...an area of undeveloped Federal land...without permanent improvement or human habitation and...where man himself is a visitor who does not remain Wilderness Act of 964 Wilderness retains its primeval character and influence, and is essentially without permanent improvement or modern human occupation Solitude or primitive and unconfined recreation has outstanding opportunities for solitude or a primitive and unconfined type of recreation Wilderness Act of 964 Wilderness provides outstanding opportunities for solitude or primitive and unconfined recreation Havasu NWR Wilderness Character Monitoring Page 6 of 58
7 Documents Consulted The documents listed below were the main sources used to help identify measures as well as supplied data for some of the measures: Havasu National Wildlife Refuge Annual Narrative Reports Years 99 & 992 Havasu National Wildlife Refuge Brochures Lower Colorado River National Wildlife Refuges: Comprehensive Management Plan and Environmental Assessment Study Report- Needles Wilderness Proposal: Havasu National Wildlife Refuge Other Documents Consulted Keeping it Wild: An Interagency Strategy to Monitor Trends in Wilderness Character Across the National Wilderness Preservation System Peter Landres and Others July 2008 Technical Guide for Monitoring Selected Conditions Related to Wilderness Character- Peter Landres and Others June 2009 Staff Consulted Dick Gilbert, Complex Project Leader Linda L. Miller, Refuge Manager Jack Allen, Biologist Kathleen Blair, Complex Ecologist Wayne Dingman, Law Enforcement Pamela Scott, Administration Michael Sambroski, Maintenance and Operations Benji Stewart, Fire Operations Specialists Jennifer House, Wilderness Specialist LHFO, Bureau of Land Management David Roan, Needles Bureau of Land Management Dave Conrad, Arizona Game and Fish Department Bob Henry, Arizona Game and Fish Department Lesley Fitzpatrick, Phoenix FWS Ecological Services Dr. Patricia Brown, Brown-Berry Biological Consulting Havasu NWR Wilderness Character Monitoring Page 7 of 58
8 Process Used for Identifying Measures Steps to identify measures:. Meet with key refuge staff members like the Refuge Manager and give a brief overview of the WCM project. Locate important documents like the CCP, Annual Narratives(starting from year of wilderness designation), related documents, maps and important contacts. 2. Read important documents to get a better understanding of the goals of the refuge and wilderness as well as the operations/occurrences that repetitively happen at the refuge. This may also help identify measures that are not only important to WCM; it may not require the staff to do a great deal of extra work to collect data after you leave. 3. Setup a day when a knowledgeable staff member is available to give a tour of the wilderness. Record observations in the field as well as comments by staff. This will also allow you more time to discuss possible wilderness issues that could translate into a measure. This time with the staff member is very valuable; ask many questions. 4. Compile a draft of possible measures. Participate in refuge activities to get a better understanding to what is important to staff. Since it is recommended to only have approximately 25 final measures, try to identify the most influential measures on wilderness character that not only fulfill the indicator but also account for different aspects in wilderness and data is readily available or easy to gather by staff members. 5. Setup a meeting and ask where data can be found for each well received and feasible measure. This may or may not help you find this year s data. Most times, unless it is the end of the year, the data is still being collected for some of the measures. 6. Analyze the revised measure handout to see if what goes on in the wilderness has been captured with the approximate selection of 25 measures. Also make sure that data can be easily collected and monitored by refuge staff after you leave. If you are comfortable with the list, then create a final list to show the key staff members. This meeting should also include your suggestions for: frequency, unit of measure, weight, significant change, description and data source for each measure for comment. Make a suggestion for each because it is easier for staff to comment on something rather than a blank document. 7. Enter measures, related information and available data into database. Havasu NWR Wilderness Character Monitoring Page 8 of 58
9 Selected Measures Character: Untrammeled Indicator: Actions authorized by refuge manager that manipulate the biophysical environment Measure: Actions to Manage Native Wildlife Description: A point system of authorized actions to manage native wildlife in wilderness. Actions include but are not limited to: species surveys in wilderness that disrupt natural routine and removal/dispatching of wildlife. Context: Currently Havasu management does not take any actions in wilderness to manage wildlife. This measure was created as a placeholder for management actions, if any, to native wildlife in the future. Many of the same wildlife do occur on both Havasu and Kofa. Kofa manages native wildlife so it is possible in the future that Havasu management may take similar actions on native wildlife. The refuge staff will have to assign the point value for each specific action, if any. Data Sources: Dick Gilbert, Project Leader; Linda Miller, Refuge Manager; Jack Allen, Refuge Biologist; Kathleen Blair, Ecologist; Bob Henry, AGFD Process Used to Compile/Gather Data: Conversations with refuge staff and AGFD. Significant Change: After 20, any change or increase in the management actions to native wildlife in wilderness would reflect a degrading trend. If no actions continue; the trend will remain stable. Data Adequacy: High - conversations with numerous staff members. Havasu NWR Wilderness Character Monitoring Page 9 of 58
10 Character: Untrammeled Indicator: Actions authorized by refuge manager that manipulate the biophysical environment Measure: Actions to Suppress Non-Native Plant Species Description: Number of actions to suppress non-native species. If it is available, this measure could be edited to count acres of non-native plants suppressed and/or amount of chemicals used to suppress non-native species. Context: There are non-indigenous plant species in Havasu wilderness and currently there are no management actions to suppress these species in wilderness. This measure is to capture any future actions to suppress non-native plant species by the use of herbicides and other chemicals that would alter the biophysical environment. Data Sources: Dick Gilbert, Project Leader; Linda Miller, Refuge Manager; Jack Allen, Refuge Biologist; Kathleen Blair, Ecologist Process Used to Compile/Gather Data: Conversations with refuge staff. Significant Change: After 20, any change or increase in the management actions to suppress nonnative species in wilderness would reflect a degrading trend. If no actions continue; the trend will remain stable. Data Adequacy: High - conversations with numerous staff members. Havasu NWR Wilderness Character Monitoring Page 0 of 58
11 Character: Untrammeled Indicator: Actions authorized by refuge manager that manipulate the biophysical environment Measure: Percent of Natural Fires Suppressed Averaged Over Wilderness Description: Percent of natural fire starts suppressed in Havasu wilderness. Number of lightningcaused fires that were suppressed is divided by the total number of lightning-caused fires, multiplied by 00. Context: Fires can drastically change the makeup of the wilderness. Also the actions to suppress these fires can impact the wilderness. This measure accounts for the fire as well as the actions related to suppression. Data Sources: Linda Miller, Refuge Manager; Benji Stewart, Fire Operations Specialist Process Used to Compile/Gather Data: Conversations with key refuge staff. Significant Change: The significant change for this measure is Any. Any increase to the amount of natural fires that are suppressed and actions of suppression would reflect a degrading trend. Any decrease in these actions would reflect an improving trend. Data Adequacy: High confidence in data. Natural fires that receive a suppression response are well documented by Fire Management Team. Havasu NWR Wilderness Character Monitoring Page of 58
12 Character: Untrammeled Indicator: Actions authorized by refuge manager that manipulate the biophysical environment Measure: Number of Hunting Permits Description: Total number of desert bighorn sheep hunting permits issued each year by Arizona Game and Fish Department Context: Desert bighorn sheep hunting is one of the few authorized actions that currently happens within Havasu Wilderness. Documenting the numbers of permits issued each year and comparing it to the Desert Bighorn Sheep population, managers will be able to see how the number of desert bighorn sheep taken from wilderness correlates to the population counts. Data Sources: Bob Henry, Arizona Game and Fish Department; Jack Allen, Refuge Biologist Process Used to Compile/Gather Data: Conversations with key refuge staff and agencies. Significant Change: The significant change for this measure is Any. The number of permits issued is determined by the population counts. Since there is now a low number of permits issued and the desert bighorn sheep population appears to fluctuate according to survey counts dating back to 990, any increase to the amount of hunting permits issued will be seen as a degrading trend. If fewer permits are issued, this would be an improving trend. Data Adequacy: High confidence in data. Havasu NWR Wilderness Character Monitoring Page 2 of 58
13 Character: Untrammeled Indicator: Actions not authorized by refuge manager that manipulate the biophysical environment Measure: Acres Burned Due to Human Ignited Fires Description: Acres of wilderness burned from known and documented human/visitor ignited fires in wilderness. Context: Fires can seriously alter the current state of the wilderness. Documenting the acres burned due to human ignited fires with further show the impacts humans can have on wilderness. Havasu is primarily used by trespassers on ATVs and the continuation of breaking the law by having a campfire in wilderness would not be out of line to assume as a possible action. Data Sources: Dick Gilbert, Project Leader; Linda Miller, Refuge Manager; Wayne Dingman, Law Enforcement Process Used to Compile/Gather Data: Conversations with key refuge staff because Havasu no longer produces an Annual Narrative Report. Legacy data will also have to be found by asking key data sources. Significant Change: The significant change for this measure is Any. If an amount acres burned from human/visitor ignited fires were to happen in a given year, it will reflect a degrading trend. If the amount of human ignited fires were nonexistent for any given year, it would reflect an improving trend. A change in the amount of human/visitor ignited fires will have a significant change on the biophysical environment and stable cannot be used for this measure unless it is zero. Data Adequacy: Medium confidence in data. Havasu Wilderness is not frequently visited by refuge staff; smaller human/visitor ignited fires will be missed in the data counts. Havasu NWR Wilderness Character Monitoring Page 3 of 58
14 Character: Untrammeled Indicator: Actions not authorized by refuge manager that manipulate the biophysical environment Measure: Number of Other Unauthorized Actions Description: A count of the number of unauthorized actions other than human ignited fires and vehicle intrusions that occur annually in wilderness. Context: This measure was created to capture unauthorized actions in wilderness that may happen in the future that are degrading to wilderness character but do not have a specific measure it would fall under. In the past, a visitor has brought modern human debris into wilderness to erect shrines. That is just one example of an action that could be captured in this measure. For 20, there are no known other unauthorized actions. Data Sources: Dick Gilbert, Project Leader; Linda Miller, Refuge Manager; Wayne Dingman, Law Enforcement Process Used to Compile/Gather Data: Conversations with key refuge staff because Havasu no longer produces an Annual Narrative Report. Significant Change: The significant change for this measure is Any. If any amount of unauthorized actions in wilderness were to happen in a given year, it will reflect a degrading trend. If the amount other unauthorized actions were nonexistent for any given year, it would reflect an improving or stable trend. Data Adequacy: Medium confidence in data. Havasu Wilderness is not frequently visited by refuge staff; other unauthorized actions will be missed in the data counts. Havasu NWR Wilderness Character Monitoring Page 4 of 58
15 Character: Natural Indicator: Plant and animal species and communities Measure: Desert Bighorn Sheep Description: Annual population estimates of desert bighorn sheep from aerial and group surveys. Desert bighorn sheep population estimates are derived using the Kofa Group Size Estimator. Context: Desert bighorn sheep population size is often monitored by refuge staff and Arizona Game and Fish Department. The population size from year to year can give a glimpse into the stability and health of the ecosystem in the wilderness. Population surveys are not administered every year but are often enough to give an indication of the trend. Data Sources: Bob Henry, AGFD; Jack Allen, Refuge Biologist Process Used to Compile/Gather Data: Conversations with key refuge staff because Havasu no longer produces an Annual Narrative Report. Legacy data will also have to be found by asking key data sources. Significant Change: The significant change is 0%. 0% less than previous year reflects a degrading trend. 0% more than previous year reflects an improving trend. Less than 0% either way reflects a stable trend. 20 survey will reflect a stable trend, and the significant change to determine the trend should be calculated in 202 or the next year a population size survey is conducted for Desert Bighorn Sheep. Data Adequacy: High Confidence in data. Data collected by knowledgeable staff and the Kofa Group Size Estimator is a very reliable formula to estimate the population size for Desert Bighorn Sheep. Havasu NWR Wilderness Character Monitoring Page 5 of 58
16 Character: Natural Indicator: Plant and animal species and communities Measure: Extirpated Plants and Animals Description: Number of indigenous plant and animal species that have been extirpated based on time from European contact. Context: Currently there are no known or documented extirpated species that were mentioned during the time wilderness character monitoring was conducted. This measure will serve as a placeholder for any future changes to this measure. Data Sources: Dick Gilbert, Project Leader; Linda Miller, Refuge Manager; Jack Allen, Refuge Biologist; Kathleen Blair, Ecologist; Bob Henry, AGFD; Lesley Fitzpatrick, Phx Ecological Services Process Used to Compile/Gather Data: Conversations with key refuge staff and other related agencies. Havasu no longer produces an Annual Narrative Reports. Significant Change: Any. Currently there are no documented extirpated species from Havasu Wilderness so any increase in the number would reflect a degrading trend. Data Adequacy: Medium Confidence in data. Most of the data is by word of mouth. Documents could not be located that lists extirpated species from Havasu Wilderness. Havasu NWR Wilderness Character Monitoring Page 6 of 58
17 Character: Natural Indicator: Plant and animal species and communities Measure: Non-Indigenous Species Description: Number of non-indigenous species found in wilderness. Context: Non-indigenous species can drastically influence and be detrimental to the native species of a wilderness area. This count gives an idea to the different types of non-indigenous species found in Havasu Wilderness. Data Sources: Jack Allen, Refuge Biologist; Kathleen Blair, Ecologist; Needles Wilderness Proposal Process Used to Compile/Gather Data: Conversations with key refuge staff and lists found in the Needles Wilderness Proposal Significant Change: Any. If there is an increase in the number of non-indigenous species in Havasu wilderness, it will reflect a degrading trend. Any non-indigenous species that are eradicated from Havasu Wilderness will reflect an improving trend. Data Adequacy: Medium-High confidence in data. Spatial data of the range of impact these species have on wilderness would give a better picture as to what is going on in the wilderness than just a count. It is possible that if the data is collected, this measure could be updated in the future to show a better picture as to what is going how much non-indigenous species cover is in the wilderness. Havasu NWR Wilderness Character Monitoring Page 7 of 58
18 Character: Natural Indicator: Plant and animal species and communities Measure: Present Nurseries with Myotis velifer Description: Number of old mines and other areas in wilderness observed and documented containing established maternity colonies of Myotis velifer. Context: Monitoring bat species, particularly threatened ones, is an important management activity that should happen regularly on Havasu NWR. Creating a measure for present maternity colonies will give an idea to the suitability of the habitat on Havasu that is conducive for sensitive bat populations. Data Sources: Dr. Patricia Brown, BBBC Process Used to Compile/Gather Data: Conversations with Dr. Patricia Brown, a consultant contact who was suggested to me by the ecologist, Kathleen Blair. Significant Change: The significant change for this measure is Any. If there is an increase in documented present maternity colonies, it will reflect an improving trend because there is greater biodiversity and habitat compatible for sensitive bat species in Havasu wilderness. A decrease will reflect a degrading trend. Data Adequacy: High confidence in data; consultant very knowledgeable. Myotis velifer photographed on Lower Colorado River Havasu NWR Wilderness Character Photo: Dr. Monitoring Patricia Brown Page 8 of 58
19 Character: Natural Indicator: Plant and animal species and communities Measure: Feral Burro Populations Description: Number of burros counted during scheduled desert bighorn sheep population counts. Other means of finding population of feral burros in wilderness are allowable but no additional surveys were accounted for during baseline year. Context: Feral burros are detrimental to the habitat in wilderness and continue to be a significant issue even though there are occasional BLM efforts to round up burros. To date, 56 burros in the immediate surroundings of Havasu wilderness have been captured by BLM. During survey count flights of desert bighorn sheep, staff also counts the number of burros and gathers a rough estimate of the population size. Data Sources: Jack Allen, Havasu Refuge Biologist; Bob Henry, Arizona Game and Fish Department Process Used to Compile/Gather Data: Conversation about burros with refuge biologist lead to the findings of current burro population counts. Significant Change: The population estimates for right now is 27. Since the burro creates a high impact on wilderness character and nutritional resources in wilderness are low, the significant change would be any. Data Adequacy: Medium confidence in data. The population count survey is administered during another survey and burro population is not the main priority; it is desert bighorn sheep population counts. Havasu NWR Wilderness Character Monitoring Page 9 of 58
20 Character: Natural Indicator: Biophysical Processes Measure: Present Wildlife Diseases Description: The total number of wildlife diseases documented in Havasu wilderness. Context: There are no known studies in Havasu wilderness to document the amount, if any, and the severity of wildlife diseases. This measure would capture any wildlife diseases identified in the future. Data Sources: Jack Allen, Refuge Biologist; Kathleen Blair, Ecologist Process Used to Compile/Gather Data: Conversations with key staff members. Significant Change: The significant change for this measure is Any. If there is an increase in documented present wildlife diseases, it will reflect a degrading trend. A decrease will reflect and improving trend. Data Adequacy: Medium confidence in data. There are currently no known studies or documents of present wildlife diseases. All data is from knowledgeable staff so there may be no need for wildlife disease studies if nothing appears to be out of the ordinary with wildlife. Havasu NWR Wilderness Character Monitoring Page 20 of 58
21 Character: Undeveloped Indicator: Non-recreational installations, structures and developments Measure: Actions to Cleanup Modern Human Debris - Abandoned Property, Mine, Military, etc. Description: Numerical annual count of actions to cleanup modern human debris - abandoned property, mine and military debris Context: Cleanups of modern human debris have not happen recently in Havasu Wilderness except on one brief account given by the Law Enforcement Officer, Wayne Dingman. One visitor to the wilderness was erecting shrines in wilderness and LE brought him into wilderness to locate and remove a good amount of the shrines. Future removals, if applicable should incorporate wilderness legislation and the minimum requirement analysis should be taken into consideration when the means of removal is selected for each project. For those reasons, this measure will only reflect a stable or improving trend. This could also entice refuge staff to take on more modern human debris cleanup projects if it will reflect an overall improving trend in wilderness character. Data Sources: Dick Gilbert, Project Leader; Linda Miller, Refuge Manager; Wayne Dingman, Law Enforcement Process Used to Compile/Gather Data: Conversations with staff and locating related files regarding cleanups, like Minimum Requirement Analysis documents. Significant Change: The significant change for this measure is Any. For each action that removes debris from wilderness using the proper means, an improving trend is recorded. If one action for one year is followed by just one action the next year, this still shows an improving trend. Stable trend only appears when no actions are taken. This measure cannot reflect a degrading trend. Data Adequacy: High confidence in data. Cleanup efforts in wilderness are well documented in the past and require a minimum requirement analysis of the plans on how to remove the debris. Havasu NWR Wilderness Character Monitoring Page 2 of 58
22 Character: Undeveloped Indicator: Non-recreational installations, structures and developments Measure: Number of Active and Inactive Mines Description: Number of active and inactive mines found in wilderness. Context: Havasu has a history in mining and this measure is to document that mining did exist even though it no longer happens in wilderness. Any type of mining can impact and dramatically change the wilderness and its character in multiple ways. The ideal objective is Havasu Wilderness remains an area that is no longer mined for its resources. Data Sources: Dick Gilbert, Project Leader; Linda Miller, Refuge Manager; Dr. Patricia Brown, BBBC; Bureau of Land Management Process Used to Compile/Gather Data: Conversations with refuge staff and consultant. Contact with the Bureau of Land Management because they handle the records on mining developments in all areas including wilderness. A tally of the total amount of inactive mines found wilderness was used as the data for 20. No active mines are found in wilderness as of 20. Significant Change: The significant change for this measure would be Any. Any increase mining activity would reflect a degrading trend. Data Adequacy: High confidence in data; conversations with knowledgeable contacts and available supporting documents. Havasu NWR Wilderness Character Monitoring Page 22 of 58
23 Character: Undeveloped Indicator: Non-recreational installations, structures and developments Measure: Index of Non-Recreational Physical Development Description: Number of man-made, developed structures in wilderness. The count includes but is not limited to: a. Dams b. Tanks c. Wells d. Catchments e. Temporary management related structures f. Technology/Scientific Installations Context: Havasu has only two developments in wilderness. Currently a USGS Gauging Station sits near the Colorado River that was there prior to wilderness designation and there is a wildlife drinker that was installed by AGFD in wilderness. Beyond that, there are no known authorized physical developments in wilderness. Data Sources: Dick Gilbert, Project Leader; Linda Miller, Refuge Manager; Jack Allen, Refuge Biologist Process Used to Compile/Gather Data: Conversations with key staff members and consulting refuge and wilderness documents Significant Change: The significant change for this measure is Any. If a current structure or installation is removed from wilderness, it will reflect an improving trend. If a development is added to wilderness, this will reflect a degrading trend. If nothing changes, it will reflect a stable trend. Data Adequacy: High confidence in data. Many reliable sources were consulted and staff interviewed. Plastic water tank installation by AGFD in wilderness Photo: Kelly Lockman Havasu NWR Wilderness Character Monitoring Page 23 of 58
24 Character: Undeveloped Indicator: Use of motor vehicles, motorized equipment, and mechanical transport Measure: Type and Amount of Administrative, Non-Emergency, and Emergency Use of Motor Vehicles, Motorized Equipment, or Mechanical Transport Description: Index of actual use of equipment or vehicle based on type of equipment (helicopter, chain saws, etc.) and weighted based on how many days used. Add up all the items used in wilderness plus the amount of days used to find the total to be imputed as data. Context: Some management tasks as well as emergencies require the use of motor vehicles, motorized equipment, or mechanical transport. Though properly filling minimum requirement analysis will allow refuge staff to pick the least motor or mechanized way to complete a task, at times motor and mechanized practices are the most practical or financially feasible way to complete a project. This measure is to inventory and monitor all these insistences as well as emergencies in wilderness. Currently for 20, there has been no administrative or emergency use in wilderness. Data Sources: Linda Miller, Refuge Manager; Wayne Dingman, Law Enforcement Process Used to Compile/Gather Data: Reading documents as well as consulting with refuge staff. Significant Change: The significant change for this measure is Any. Any increase the use of motorized or mechanized items would reflect a degrading trend. Any decrease in the use would reflect an improving trend. Data Adequacy: High confidence in data. Havasu wilderness projects using motor or mechanized equipment are extremely rare. View from wilderness boundary with a posted No Vehicle sign Photo: Kelly Lockman Havasu NWR Wilderness Character Monitoring Page 24 of 58
25 Character: Undeveloped Indicator: Use of motor vehicles, motorized equipment, and mechanical transport Measure: Number of Management and Other Documented Flyovers Description: A total count of the number of management and other documented flyovers that occur annually over wilderness. Context: It is known that management occasionally does flyovers to do wildlife surveys. There was one this year for the desert bighorn sheep population survey. In the future, management can also document any flyovers they witness while working in or in the vicinity of wilderness. Data Sources: Jack Allen, Refuge Biologist; Bob Henry, AGFD Process Used to Compile/Gather Data: Conversations with key staff members and partner agencies. Significant Change: The significant change for this measure is Any. Currently the amount of documented flyovers is relatively small and any change in the number would be considered a significant change. If the number of flyovers was to increase in a given year, this would reflect a degrading trend. If the number was to decrease, this would reflect an improving trend. If the number was to remain the same, it would reflect a stable trend. Data Adequacy: Medium confidence in this data. Not all of the flyovers can be captured by refuge staff. Havasu NWR Wilderness Character Monitoring Page 25 of 58
26 Character: Undeveloped Indicator: Use of motor vehicles, motorized equipment, and mechanical transport Measure: Incidents and Known Civilian Vehicle Intrusions Description: Number of incidents and known civilian vehicle intrusions in wilderness. This count includes: a. Violation notices issued for vehicle intrusions in wilderness b. Documented vehicle tracks in wilderness Context: ATV/UTV use is a big recreational component in this area. There are other places in the county to use ATV/UTVs but some visitors do not abide by the rules and enter wilderness on their vehicles. Intruders sometimes even take down refuge fences that are put up on the boundary and bullets holes are frequently found in refuge posted signs. Tracks are noticeable and create considerable damage to wilderness character. Unfortunately it is difficult to catch every intrusion, but violation notices have been written in the past and refuge staff does notice the tracks when out when checking boundary fences. Data Sources: Wilderness Fellow field survey; Law enforcement Vehicle intrusion in wilderness Photo: Kelly Lockman Process Used to Compile/Gather Data: Collecting violation notices from refuge law enforcement and personal field visits to frequently intruded sites. Significant Change: The significant change for this measure is Any. Even though every instance of intrusion cannot be completely measured, the amount of violation notices and documented intrusions captured in a given year will be indicative of what is happening across Havasu wilderness. An increase in the amount of intrusions will reflect a degrading trend. A decrease in the amount of intrusions will reflect an improving trend. No change will reflect a stable trend. Data Adequacy: Medium confidence in this data. Not all of the intrusions can be captured by refuge staff. Vehicle intrusion in wilderness Photo: Kelly Lockman Destroyed boundary fence/sign Photo:Lockman Havasu NWR Wilderness Character Monitoring Page 26 of 58
27 Character: Undeveloped Indicator: Inholdings Measure: Inholding Acres Description: Acres of inholdings within wilderness boundaries. Includes any inholding that is within and/or surrounded by the wilderness boundary line; both AZ and CA sides. Context: Private land ownership in the form parcels within and/or surrounded by wilderness occur in Havasu. An inventory of the amount of acres of inholdings will monitor private land ownerships impact on wilderness character. Data Sources: Dick Gilbert, Project Leader; Linda Miller, Refuge Manager; GIS maps Process Used to Compile/Gather Data: Conversations with refuge staff and reading documents related to what is going on in the wilderness. Significant Change: The significant change for this measure is Any. If the inholding acres decrease because the property was gifted/sold to Havasu NWR, this would reflect an improving trend. An increase in private inholdings within and/or surrounded by wilderness would reflect a degrading trend. No changes would reflect a stable trend. Data Adequacy: High confidence in data. Interviewed multiple staff members. Havasu NWR Wilderness Character Monitoring Page 27 of 58
28 Character: Undeveloped Indicator: Loss to statutorily protected cultural resources Measure: Disturbances to Cultural Resources Description: a. Severity of disturbances to cultural resources by photos/status reports b. Number/severity of disturbance to archeological sites or resources listed on National Register of Historic Places c. Disturbances/Removal of cultural resources like Picture Rock Context: There are cultural resources in Havasu Wilderness and in the past there have been disturbances to these areas. Picture Rock is most popular and could possibly be the one that has the most instances of vandalism. Staff members did not have data to give me on recent disturbances or a complete list/map of cultural resources on Havasu Wilderness. There is just a general understanding that there are cultural resources and they are occasionally disturbed. Data Sources: Havasu Refuge staff Process Used to Compile/Gather Data: The only known way to gather data is to ask refuge staff if they have noticed and/or documented any disturbances to cultural resources in wilderness. Significant Change: The significant change for this measure is Any. If there are any increases in new disturbances, this will reflect a degrading trend. No new disturbances will create a stable trend. An improving trend does not appear to be plausible for this measure unless there is work to properly restore or protect existing cultural resources. Data Adequacy: Low confidence in data. Primitive cultural resources are not particularly monitored closely and not all of them have been found and mapped out in detail. This measure appeared to be the most suitable for Havasu because monitoring of all cultural resources is not frequent. Havasu NWR Wilderness Character Monitoring Page 28 of 58
29 Character: Solitude or Primitive and Unconfined Recreation Indicator: Facilities that decrease self-reliant recreation Measure: Agency Provided Recreation Facilities Description: This count includes but is not limited to: a. Number of tent pads b. Number of recreational/directional signs (NOT including refuge/wilderness boundary signs) c. Number of shelters d. Number of backcountry campsites e. Miles of maintained foot trails Context: Havasu refuge staff does not provide or maintain any recreation facilities in wilderness. This measure is set up to fulfill this indicator and monitor future development of facilities that decrease self-reliant recreation in wilderness, if applicable. Data Sources: Linda Miller, Refuge Manager; Dick Gilbert, Project Leader; Wayne Dingman, Law Enforcement; Documents consulted Process Used to Compile/Gather Data: Conversations with refuge staff and reading documents related to what is going on in the wilderness. Significant Change: The significant change for this measure is Any. Any increase to the amount of facilities would reflect a degrading trend. The trend is now consistently stable because there are no facilities and the next possible trend would be degrading because they cannot improve on zero. Data Adequacy: High confidence in data. The sources are very reliable. Havasu NWR Wilderness Character Monitoring Page 29 of 58
30 Character: Solitude or Primitive and Unconfined Recreation Indicator: Management Restrictions Measure: Acres of Wilderness Recreational Camping is not Permitted Description: Total acreage in wilderness where visitors cannot freely choose to camp overnight using non-motorized/mechanized means. Management does not allow recreational camping and any overnights must be authorized and approved with a special use permit. Context: Havasu wilderness is rarely visited by citizens; mostly just people intruding on ATVs. The restriction on the freedom to camp greatly diminishes this character quality, specifically unconfined recreation. Data Sources: Dick Gilbert, Project Leader; Linda Miller, Refuge Manager Process Used to Compile/Gather Data: Conversations with key staff members. Significant Change: The significant change is Any. If the allowable acres to camp increased, this would reflect an improving trend. Data Adequacy: High confidence in data. The sources are very reliable. Havasu NWR Wilderness Character Monitoring Page 30 of 58
31 Character: Solitude or Primitive and Unconfined Recreation Indicator: Remoteness from sights and sounds of people inside the wilderness Measure: Special Use Permits Description: Number of special use permits administered by management to allow projects, overnights, and/or other visitations to wilderness. Context: Havasu does not keep a record of annual public use numbers nor does it allow recreational overnight camping to the everyday user. This is the only data collected annually regarding public use in wilderness. Data Sources: Linda Miller, Refuge Manager Process Used to Compile/Gather Data: Conversations with key refuge staff members. Significant Change: The significant change should be assessed on a year to year basis. The amount and what the special use permit is allowing will determine the proper trend. Data Adequacy: High confidence in data. SUPs are well documented by staff. Havasu NWR Wilderness Character Monitoring Page 3 of 58
32 Character: Solitude Indicator: Remoteness from sights and sounds of people inside the wilderness Measure: Administrative Travel Routes and Access Roads Description: Miles of administrative access routes and roads in wilderness. Context: There are no current administrative or access routes being used by refuge staff. This measure is to track future developments under this measure, if any. Data Sources: Dick Gilbert, Project Leader; Linda Miller, Refuge Manager Process Used to Compile/Gather Data: Conversation with key staff members. Significant Change: The significant change for this measure is Any. Data Adequacy: High confidence in data. Interviewed many staff members. Havasu NWR Wilderness Character Monitoring Page 32 of 58
33 Character: Solitude or Primitive and Unconfined Recreation Indicator: Remoteness from sights and sounds of people outside the wilderness Measure: Motorboat Citations and Warnings over 86 Decibels Description: Number of citations and warnings administered by law enforcement to motorboat users on the Colorado River adjacent to wilderness who exceed the state law of 86 decibels. Context: Havasu law enforcement primarily patrols the waterways in the Topock Gorge, an area that is adjacent to wilderness on both AZ and CA sides. They commonly use a decibel meter to calculate the decibel levels of motorboats used in the area. Warnings and citations are given out to offenders of a decibel level higher than 86; it is the state law. Data Sources: Wayne Dingman, Law Enforcement Process Used to Compile/Gather Data: Conversations with key refuge staff members. Significant Change: The significant change is 25%. If there is a 25% increase in the number of citations and warnings administered, this would reflect a degrading trend. If there is a 25% decrease, this would reflect an improving trend. Anything lower than 25% would be considered a stable trend. Data Adequacy: Medium confidence in data. Even though it is easy to calculate the amount of citations and warnings each year, not all offenders of the state law will be caught by law enforcement. Havasu NWR Wilderness Character Monitoring Page 33 of 58
34 Character: Solitude or Primitive and Unconfined Recreation Indicator: Remoteness from sights and sounds of people outside the wilderness Measure: Miles of Wilderness Boundary Adjacent to Private Lands Description: Total number of miles of privately owned land that shares a boundary line with Havasu wilderness on both CA and AZ sides. Not to include private inholdings within the wilderness; that is captured in another measure. Context: Land parcels in the west tend to have a checkerboard layout and the wilderness is adjacent to other federal, state and public lands. An inventory of private lands that sit adjacent to the wilderness show a possible threat of development that would diminish the wilderness character, particularly the solitude quality. Monitoring these land statuses can assess trends particular to events immediately outside the wilderness. Data Sources: Bureau of Land Management contacts; Linda Miller, Refuge Manager Process Used to Compile/Gather Data: Conversations with key refuge staff members. Significant Change: The significant change would be any. If there is an increase in the amount of miles that are adjacent to wilderness boundary, this would reflect a degrading trend. If there is a decrease in the amount of miles that are adjacent to wilderness boundary, this would reflect an improving trend. Data Adequacy: High confidence in data. Very reliable sources and BLM provided GIS layers. Developed private land parcels near southern boundary of wilderness Photo: Kelly Lockman Havasu NWR Wilderness Character Monitoring Page 34 of 58
35 Character: Solitude or Primitive and Unconfined Recreation Indicator: Remoteness from sights and sounds of people outside the wilderness Measure: No Wake Zones in River Channel Adjacent to Wilderness Description: Miles of no wake zones in main river channel on the Colorado River in areas with wilderness adjacent on both sides. This is not to include any backwater channels. Context: The Colorado River has a great amount of boat activity through the Topock Gorge, an area where most of the land is designated wilderness. The sounds from the boats intrude on the solitude of the wilderness and the wake can also cause land erosion. Speed, sounds, and wake of the boat can also disrupt migratory birds and other wildlife that use both the river and wilderness areas. Data Sources: Dick Gilbert, Project Leader; Wayne Dingman, Law Enforcement Process Used to Compile/Gather Data: Conversations with key staff members. Significant Change: The significant change would be any. If there is an increase in the amount of miles that are designated no wake zones this would reflect an improving trend. If there is a decrease in the amount of no wake zones, this would reflect a degrading trend. Data Adequacy: High confidence in data. Very reliable sources and personally observed the no wake zone in field. Slow No Wake buoy at Devil s Elbow; wilderness in background Photo: Kelly Lockman Havasu NWR Wilderness Character Monitoring Page 35 of 58
36 Measures Not Used The measures listed in this section were not used for various reasons. Some measures no data is currently being collected and others may have been of low priority or have minimal impacts on Havasu Wilderness. At this time, this program was not intended to create additional work for refuge staff. Some of these measures listed below would need considerable amounts of time dedicated from refuge staff. Collecting data for some of these measures may also create more degradation to wilderness character than the measure the data is being collected for. Also, Havasu currently does not have ArcGIS or a staff member who works with the program and many of these measures were not used because even if data was collected, there is no technical support at this office or a staff member here who could use ArcGIS. These measures could possibly be used in the future to gather a more complete picture of wilderness character. Character: Untrammeled Indicator: Actions authorized by refuge manager that manipulate the biophysical environment Measures Number of scientific research projects Number of contamination investigations from prior activities Reason/Priority Partially captured in Special Use Permits measure Low priority No data available Low priority Character: Untrammeled Indicator: Actions not authorized by refuge manager that manipulate the biophysical environment Measures Number of incidents of abandoned property Number of illegal taking incidents of rocks and/or species Reason/Priority Captured in modern human debris cleanups Enormous wilderness to inventory all incidents Low priority No data available, not accurately monitored Hard to distinguish between takings from wilderness and refuge Medium priority, possible future measure if it can be accurately documented Havasu NWR Wilderness Character Monitoring Page 36 of 58
37 Character: Natural Indicator: Plant and animal species and communities Measures Number of native species of concern Acres of non-indigenous plant species Abundance of Herpitiles Present Bat Species No specific list Other measures used had data available Medium priority, majority are either in river or riparian zone, mainly outside of wilderness Data for this measure is not collected at this time Possible future measure Medium priority Data not collected Possible future measure Medium-high Priority, illegally taken No data collected on specific species; bat measure used captures the threat/degradation to a specific species Medium priority Character: Natural Indicator: Physical Resources Measures Extent and magnitude of change in water quality Extent and magnitude of disturbance to desert pavement Extent and magnitude of soil contaminants from prior land use activities Extent and magnitude of disturbance or loss of soil or soil crusts Data not consistently gathered by refuge staff Medium priority, drinking water for species Data not collected Low priority, disturbance conclusions can be drawn from vehicle intrusions Data not collected Low priority Data not collected Low priority Havasu NWR Wilderness Character Monitoring Page 37 of 58
38 Character: Natural Indicator: Biophysical Processes Measures Extent and magnitude of global climate change Area and magnitude for pathways for movement of non-indigenous species into wilderness Extent and magnitude of wildlife diseases Reason/Priority Data not collected by refuge staff Medium priority Data not collected by refuge staff Low priority Data not regularly monitored by refuge staff Low priority at this time Character: Undeveloped Indicator: Non-recreational structures, installations, and developments Measures Number of tracking devices Miles of wilderness boundary fence Linear miles of utilities Reason/Priority Not currently in wilderness Would be captured in other measure Low priority No data available Area would need to be walked, very steep and long boundary High priority Low priority Low occurrences on wilderness Possible future measure if changes occur Havasu NWR Wilderness Character Monitoring Page 38 of 58
39 Character: Undeveloped Indicator: Use of motor vehicles, motorized equipment, and mechanical transport Measures: n/a Character: Undeveloped Indicator: Inholdings Measures Area and existing or potential impact of inholdings within and adjacent to wilderness Reason/Priority Impact data not collected Other measure used Medium priority, possible future measure Character: Undeveloped Indicator: Loss to statutorily protected cultural resources Measures: n/a Character: Solitude Indicator: Remoteness from sights and sounds of people inside the wilderness Measures Amount of visitor use Area of wilderness affected by access and travel routes that are inside the wilderness Number of tracking devices on animals Reason/Priority Not monitored Possible future measure if means of monitoring visitor use becomes more accurate Medium priority Possible future measure if appropriately analyzed by staff Medium priority None in wilderness; can be captured with manage measure Low priority Havasu NWR Wilderness Character Monitoring Page 39 of 58
40 Character: Solitude Indicator: Remoteness from occupied and modified areas outside the wilderness Measures Area of wilderness affected by access and travel routes that are outside the wilderness Visibility of development from wilderness Night sky visibility averaged over wilderness Extent and magnitude of intrusions on the natural soundscape Visibility of refuge activities from wilderness Reason/Priority Partially captured in another measure used Possible future measure if appropriately analyzed by staff Medium priority Partially capture in other used measures Medium priority, not monitored No established protocol Possible future measure Medium priority, not monitored Usage periods vary greatly during different times of the year Refuge staff cannot totally control boat activities High priority Unable to accurately monitor Low priority Developmental growth adjacent to wilderness No data available No GIS currently at office High priority Character: Solitude Indicator: Facilities that decrease self-reliant recreation Measures: n/a Character: Solitude Indicator: Management Restrictions Measures: n/a Havasu NWR Wilderness Character Monitoring Page 40 of 58
41 Conclusions The selected measures give a comprehensive approach to the many actions that happen within and affect wilderness. Keeping the number of measures under 30, staff will be able to document the data for each measure more accurately than if there was a measure for every action related to wilderness character. This is not to imply that every measure data will be one hundred percent accurate and not every trend outcome is completely controllable by refuge staff. Some of the measures selected, the action or development does not currently exist on Havasu Wilderness. The measure was created to monitor potential threats to wilderness in the future. Havasu Wilderness is generally not visited by a majority of the staff. The maintenance worker occasionally checks and fixes wilderness boundary fence and law enforcement occasionally monitors visitor actions in wilderness but they primarily patrol the Colorado River. Havasu has more of a hands off approach to wilderness management than other areas like Kofa. The lack of management presence also makes it difficult to monitor, document, and prevent the greatest wilderness degradation action, civilian vehicle intrusions. The data accuracy for this measure is questionable due to simply finding more tracks in subsequent years, and it is not a clear indication as to which year more tracks were created. Therefore, the accuracy of a changing trend for this measure is questionable. Out of all the characters for wilderness monitoring, Kofa Wilderness is currently most affected in the Solitude character. Sounds intrusions is the most degrading at this time. The motorboat use in the adjacent Colorado River can be heard from all areas of the wilderness. There appears to be no reduction of use in the foreseeable future and law enforcement currently hands out citations for sounds that exceed the state law. The next greatest threat is the surrounding pressures from development in the area. An inventory of the amount of private lands that are adjacent to wilderness has been used for the 20 baseline. Future analysis from staff could include the effects from development and population growth in surrounding areas. Recreational camping is not permitted in any area and special use permits must be obtained before an overnight in wilderness. Havasu management does not affect the Untrammeled quality in wilderness. There are currently no actions to manage native wildlife, suppress non-native plant species or suppress natural fires. The only action that occurs occasionally is burro roundups that are done by Bureau of Land Management and Arizona Game and Fish Department. This action is currently taking place by placing corrals on BLM land; not intrusive to Havasu Wilderness. Many of the measures selected should reflect a stable trend from year to year unless a very significant event takes place in wilderness. Significant events include the increase or decrease in roads, facilities, wildlife water sources, other structures and installations, an acquisition of an inholding, or an extirpation of a species. This should allow the staff to focus on the measures that require more work and documentation because significant events in wilderness like the ones mentioned above rarely go unnoticed by staff and interested parties. Havasu NWR Wilderness Character Monitoring Page 4 of 58
42 Appendix Refuge: Havasu National Wildlife Refuge Date: //20 Kelly Lockman Measure Untrammeled Quality Actions to Suppress Non- Native Species Actions to Manage Native Wildlife Natural Fire Starts that Receive a Suppression Response Keeping Track of Wilderness Character Monitoring Measures Priority (H, M, L) L M M Detailed Description of the Data Source(s) and How the Data Were Gathered Dick Gilbert, Project Leader; Linda Miller, Refuge Manager; Jack Allen, Refuge Biologist; Kathleen Blair, Ecologist; Bob Henry, AGFD. Conversations with refuge staff. Dick Gilbert, Project Leader; Linda Miller, Refuge Manager; Jack Allen, Refuge Biologist; Kathleen Blair, Ecologist. Conversations with refuge staff and AGFD. Linda Miller, Refuge Manager; Benji Stewart, Fire Operations Specialist. Conversations with key refuge staff. Number of Hunting Permits M Bob Henry, Arizona Game and Fish Department; Jack Allen, Refuge Biologist Acres Burned Due to Human Ignited Fires H Dick Gilbert, Project Leader; Linda Miller, Refuge Manager; Wayne Dingman, Law Enforcement. Conversations with key refuge staff. Other Unauthorized Actions L Dick Gilbert, Project Leader; Linda Miller, Refuge Manager; Wayne Dingman, Law Enforcement. Conversations with key refuge staff Natural Quality Feral Burro Populations H Jack Allen, Havasu Refuge Biologist; Bob Henry, Arizona Game and Fish Department. Conversation about burros with refuge biologist lead to the findings of current burro population Extirpated Plants and Animals H counts. Dick Gilbert, Project Leader; Linda Miller, Refuge Manager; Jack Allen, Refuge Biologist; Kathleen Blair, Ecologist; Bob Henry, AGFD; Lesley Fitzpatrick, PHX Ecological Services. Conversations with key refuge staff and other related agencies. Non-Indigenous Species H Jack Allen, Refuge Biologist; Kathleen Blair, Ecologist; Needles Wilderness Proposal. Conversations with key refuge staff and lists found in the Needles Wilderness Proposal Present Nurseries with Myotis velifer H Dr. Patricia Brown, BBBC. Conversations with Dr. Patricia Brown Bob Henry, AGFD; Jack Allen, Refuge Biologist. Conversations with key refuge staff Desert Bighorn Sheep H Population Number of Wildlife Diseases L Jack Allen, Refuge Biologist; Kathleen Blair, Ecologist. Conversations with key staff members Havasu NWR Wilderness Character Monitoring Page 42 of 58
43 Undeveloped Quality Actions to Cleanup Modern Human Debris - Abandoned Property, Mine, Military, etc. Number of Active and Inactive Mines in Wilderness Number of Management and Other Flyovers OR Landings Authorized Non-Recreational Physical Development Water Attributes, Utilities, Technological Installations, Fences, Signs, Bat Gates, Type and Amount of Administrative, Non- Emergency, and Emergency Use of Motor Vehicles, Motorized Equipment, or Mechanical Transport Incidents and Known Civilian Vehicle Intrusions M L L H M H Dick Gilbert, Project Leader; Linda Miller, Refuge Manager; Wayne Dingman, Law Enforcement Conversations with staff and locating related files regarding cleanups, like Minimum Requirement Analysis documents. Dick Gilbert, Project Leader; Linda Miller, Refuge Manager; Dr. Patricia Brown, BBBC; Bureau of Land Management. Conversations with refuge staff and consultant. Jack Allen, Refuge Biologist; Bob Henry, AGFD Conversations with key staff members and partner agencies. Dick Gilbert, Project Leader; Linda Miller, Refuge Manager; Jack Allen, Refuge Biologist. Conversations with key staff members and consulting refuge and wilderness documents Linda Miller, Refuge Manager; Wayne Dingman, Law Enforcement. Reading documents as well as consulting with refuge staff. Wilderness Fellow field survey; Law enforcement. Collecting violation notices from refuge law enforcement and personal field visits to frequently intruded sites. Inholding Acres L Dick Gilbert, Project Leader; Linda Miller, Refuge Manager; GIS maps. Conversations with refuge staff and reading documents related to what is going on in the wilderness. Disturbances to Cultural Resources Solitude or Primitive and Unconfined Quality Agency Provided Recreation Facilities Administrative Travel Routes and Access Roads Number of Special Use Permits Motorboat Citations and Warnings over 86 Decibels M L L L H Havasu Refuge staff. The only known way to gather data is to ask refuge staff if they have noticed and/or documented any disturbances to cultural resources in wilderness. Linda Miller, Refuge Manager; Dick Gilbert, Project Leader; Wayne Dingman, Law Enforcement; Documents consulted. Conversations with refuge staff and reading documents related to what is going on in the wilderness. Dick Gilbert, Project Leader; Linda Miller, Refuge Manager Conversation with key staff members. Linda Miller, Refuge Manager. Conversations with key refuge staff members. Wayne Dingman, Law Enforcement Conversations with key refuge staff members. Havasu NWR Wilderness Character Monitoring Page 43 of 58
44 No Wake Zones in River Channel Adjacent to Wilderness Miles of Wilderness Boundary Adjacent to Private Lands (not for conservation; could possibly be developed in future) Acres of Wilderness Recreational Camping is not Permitted M H M Dick Gilbert, Project Leader; Wayne Dingman, Law Enforcement. Conversations with key staff members. Bureau of Land Management; Linda Miller, Refuge Manager. Conversations with key refuge staff members. Dick Gilbert, Project Leader; Linda Miller, Refuge Manager Conversations with key staff members. WORKSHEET: PRIORITIZING MEASURES OF WILDERNESS CHARACTER In each row, write the indicator and potential measure in the left column. Use the following criteria and ranking guide to create an overall score for each measure. Those measures with the highest overall scores should be the highest priority for assessing trends in wilderness character. A. Level of importance (the measure is highly relevant to the quality and indicator of wilderness character, and is highly useful for managing the wilderness): High = 3 points, Medium = 2 points, Low = point B. Level of vulnerability (measures an attribute of wilderness character that currently is at risk, or might likely be at risk over 0-5 years): High = 3 points, Medium = 2 points, Low = point C. Degree of reliability (the measure can be monitored accurately with a high degree of confidence, and would yield the same result if measured by different people at different times): High = 3 points, Medium = 2 points, Low = point D. Degree of reasonableness (the measure is related to an existing effort or could be monitored without significant additional effort): High = point, Low = 0 point QUALITY OF WILDERNESS CHARACTER UNTRAMMELED Criteria for Prioritizing Potential Measures Potential Measure A. Importance B. Vulnerability C. Reliability D. Reasonablenes s OVERALL SCORE Indicator: actions authorized by manager to manipulate environment Measure: Actions to Havasu NWR Wilderness Character Monitoring Page 44 of 58
45 Potential Measure Manage Native Wildlife Criteria for Prioritizing Potential Measures A. Importance B. Vulnerability C. Reliability D. Reasonablenes s OVERALL SCORE Indicator: actions authorized by manager to manipulate environment Measure: Number of Bighorn Sheep Hunting Permits STOP! 3 6 Indicator: actions authorized by manager to manipulate environment Measure: Actions to Suppress Non- Native Plant Species 3 2 If A + B 3 9 Indicator: actions NOT authorized by manager to manipulate environment Measure: Human Ignited Fires Indicator: actions NOT authorized by manager to manipulate environment Measure: Other Unauthorized Actions Names of team members filling out this worksheet: Jack Allen, Havasu Refuge Biologist Havasu NWR Wilderness Character Monitoring Page 45 of 58
46 Potential Measure Criteria for Prioritizing Potential Measures A. Importance B. Vulnerability C. Reliability D. Reasonablenes s OVERALL SCORE Indicator: actions authorized by manager to manipulate environment 2 Measure: Actions to Manage Native Wildlife Indicator: actions authorized by manager to manipulate environment Measure: Number of Bighorn Sheep Hunting Permits Indicator: actions authorized by manager to manipulate environment Measure: Actions to Suppress Non-Native Plant Species 2 STOP! Indicator: actions NOT authorized by manager to manipulate environment Measure: Human Ignited Fires 3 3 If A + B 2 9 Indicator: actions NOT authorized by manager to manipulate environment Measure: Other Unauthorized Actions Names of team members filling out this worksheet: Linda Miller, Havasu Refuge Manager Havasu NWR Wilderness Character Monitoring Page 46 of 58
47 Potential Measure QUALITY OF WILDERNESS CHARACTER NATURAL Criteria for Prioritizing Potential Measures A. Importance B. Vulnerability C. Reliability D. Reasonablenes s OVERALL SCORE Indicator: Plant and animal species communities Measure: Extirpated Plants and Animals Indicator: Plant and animal species communities Measure: Non- Indigenous Species Indicator: Plant and animal species communities Measure: Present Nurseries with Myotis velifer Indicator: Plant and Animal Communities Measure: Desert Bighorn Sheep Population STOP! If A + B Indicator: Plant and Animal Communities Measure: Feral Burro Population Indicator: Biophysical Resources Measure: Natural Fire Starts that Receive a Suppression Response 2 5 Havasu NWR Wilderness Character Monitoring Page 47 of 58
48 Names of team members filling out this worksheet: Jack Allen, Havasu Refuge Biologist Criteria for Prioritizing Potential Measures Potential Measure A. Importance B. Vulnerability C. Reliability D. Reasonablenes s OVERALL SCORE Indicator: Plant and animal species communities Measure: Extirpated Plants and Animals Indicator: Plant and animal species communities Measure: Non- Indigenous Species Indicator: Plant and animal species communities Measure: Present Nurseries with Myotis Velifer Indicator: Plant and Animal Communities Measure: Desert Bighorn Sheep Population STOP! If A + B Indicator: Plant and Animal Communities Measure: Feral Burro Population Indicator: Biophysical Resources Measure: Natural Fire Starts that Receive a Suppression Response 2 Havasu NWR Wilderness Character Monitoring Page 48 of 58
49 Names of team members filling out this worksheet: Linda Miller, Havasu Refuge Manager QUALITY OF WILDERNESS CHARACTER UNDEVELOPED Criteria for Prioritizing Potential Measures Potential Measure Indicator: Nonrecreational structures, installations, and developments A. Importance B. Vulnerability C. Reliability D. Reasonablenes s OVERALL SCORE Measure: Number of non-recreational development mine safety structures, water attributes, buildings, fences, gates, tracking devices and instruments, etc. 3 STOP! If A + B 3 8 Indicator: Nonrecreational structures, installations, and developments Measure: Actions to Cleanup Modern Human Debris - Abandoned Property, Mine, Military, etc Indicator: Nonrecreational structures, installations, and developments Measure: Number of Havasu NWR Wilderness Character Monitoring Page 49 of 58
50 Potential Measure Inactive Mines in Wilderness Criteria for Prioritizing Potential Measures A. Importance B. Vulnerability C. Reliability D. Reasonablenes s OVERALL SCORE Indicator: Nonrecreational structures, installations, and developments Measure: Number of Management and Other Documented Flyovers Indicator: Use of motor vehicles, motorized equipment, or mechanical transport Measure: Type and Amount of Administrative, Non-Emergency and Emergency Use of Motor Vehicles, Motorized Equipment, or Mechanical Transport 3 STOP! 3 8 Indicator: Use of motor vehicles, motorized equipment, or mechanical transport Measure: Incidents and Known Civilian Vehicle Intrusions If A + B Havasu NWR Wilderness Character Monitoring Page 50 of 58
51 Potential Measure Criteria for Prioritizing Potential Measures A. Importance B. Vulnerability C. Reliability D. Reasonablenes s OVERALL SCORE Indicator: Inholdings Measure: Inholding Acres Within Wilderness STOP! 2 Indicator: Loss of statutorily protected cultural resources Measure: Disturbances to Cultural Resources 3 If A + B Names of team members filling out this worksheet: Jack Allen, Havasu Refuge Biologist Criteria for Prioritizing Potential Measures Potential Measure Indicator: Nonrecreational structures, installations, and developments A. Importance B. Vulnerability C. Reliability D. Reasonablenes s OVERALL SCORE Measure: Number of non-recreational development mine safety structures, water attributes, buildings, fences, gates, tracking devices and instruments, etc STOP! If A + B Havasu NWR Wilderness Character Monitoring Page 5 of 58
52 Potential Measure Criteria for Prioritizing Potential Measures A. Importance B. Vulnerability C. Reliability D. Reasonablenes s OVERALL SCORE Indicator: Nonrecreational structures, installations, and developments Measure: Actions to Cleanup Modern Human Debris - Abandoned Property, Mine, Military, etc Indicator: Nonrecreational structures, installations, and developments Measure: Number of Active and Inactive Mines in Wilderness Indicator: Nonrecreational structures, installations, and developments Measure: Number of Management and Other Documented Flyovers 2 STOP! 2 6 Indicator: Use of motor vehicles, motorized equipment, or mechanical transport If A + B Measure: Type and Amount of Administrative, Non- Emergency and Emergency Use of Motor Vehicles, Motorized Equipment, or Mechanical Transport Havasu NWR Wilderness Character Monitoring Page 52 of 58
53 Potential Measure Criteria for Prioritizing Potential Measures A. Importance B. Vulnerability C. Reliability D. Reasonablenes s OVERALL SCORE Indicator: Use of motor vehicles, motorized equipment, or mechanical transport Measure: Incidents and Known Civilian Vehicle Intrusions Indicator: Inholdings Measure: Inholding Acres Within Wilderness Indicator: Loss of statutorily protected cultural resources Measure: Disturbances to Cultural Resources STOP! If A + B Names of team members filling out this worksheet: Linda Miller, Havasu Refuge Manager QUALITY OF WILDERNESS CHARACTER SOLITUDE Criteria for Prioritizing Potential Measures Potential Measure A. Importance B. Vulnerability C. Reliability D. Reasonablenes s OVERALL SCORE Indicator: Remoteness from sights and sounds of people inside the wilderness Measure: Number of Special Use STOP! Havasu NWR Wilderness Character Monitoring If A + B Page 53 of 58
Kofa Wilderness. FWS National Wildlife Refuge System Wilderness Fellows. Kelly L. Lockman. Report on Wilderness Character Monitoring
FWS National Wildlife Refuge System Wilderness Fellows Report on Wilderness Character Monitoring Kofa Wilderness Kelly L. Lockman U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service 9/12/2011 Table of Contents Kofa National
More informationWILDERNESS PLANNING. Wilderness. Interagency Regional Wilderness Stewardship Training. Alamosa, Colorado - March 26-29, 2007
WILDERNESS PLANNING Interagency Regional Wilderness Stewardship Training Alamosa, Colorado - March 26-29, 2007 Suzanne Stutzman Lead Planner/Wilderness Coordinator National Park Service, Intermountain
More informationImperial National Wildlife Refuge A Report on Wilderness Character Monitoring
UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Imperial National Wildlife Refuge A Report on Wilderness Character Monitoring Molly McCarter September 2011 This document was created as part of the FWS National
More informationOverview. Wilderness Act of Statement of Need. What is Wilderness Character. Monitoring Wilderness Character
Overview Monitoring Wilderness Character What What & Why? How? How? Conceptual Development How? How? Implementation Future? Future? Troy Hall Steve Boutcher USFS Wilderness & Wild and Scenic River Program
More informationConnie Rudd Superintendent, Black Canyon of the Gunnison National Park
National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Black Canyon of the Gunnison National Park and Curecanti National Recreation Area Information Brochure #1 Wilderness and Backcountry Management Plan
More informationWORKSHEET 1 Wilderness Qualities or Attributes Evaluating the Effects of Project Activities on Wilderness Attributes
WORKSHEET 1 Wilderness Qualities or Attributes Evaluating the Effects of Project Activities on Wilderness Attributes Date: 3/7/2017 Roadless Area: Ruby South Description of Project Activity or Impact to
More informationWilderness Stewardship Plan Scoping Newsletter Winter 2013
Olympic National Park National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Wilderness Stewardship Plan Scoping Newsletter Winter 2013 Dear Friends and Neighbors, The Olympic Wilderness was established
More informationCreating a User-Driven Long-Distance OHV Trail Through Partnering
Joseph Raffaele Outdoor Recreation Planner U.S. Bureau of Land Management Yuma, Arizona Creating a User-Driven Long-Distance OHV Trail Through Partnering BLM is a multiple-use land management agency within
More informationWilderness Research. in Alaska s National Parks. Scientists: Heading to the Alaska Wilderness? Introduction
Wilderness Research in Alaska s National Parks National Park Service U.S. Department of Interior Scientists: Heading to the Alaska Wilderness? Archeologist conducts fieldwork in Gates of the Arctic National
More informationCoconino National Forest Potential Wilderness Proposal
Coconino National Forest Potential Wilderness Proposal As part of their Forest Plan Update, the Coconino National Forest needs to address the need for additional wilderness. The last evaluation was done
More informationFinal Recreation Report. Sunflower Allotment Grazing Analysis. July 2015
Final Recreation Report Sunflower Allotment Grazing Analysis July 2015 Table of Contents Introduction... 3 Affected Environment... 3 Four Peaks Wilderness Area... 3 Dispersed Recreation... 3 Environmental
More informationPRESERVING WILDERNESS CHARACTER
PRESERVING WILDERNESS CHARACTER Why is it important? What is it? How will it help wilderness stewardship? Peter Landres, Aldo Leopold Wilderness Research Institute Rocky Mountain Research Station, USDA
More informationArthur Carhart National Wilderness Training Center s Wilderness Investigations High School
Arthur Carhart National Training Center s Investigations High School 101/Lesson 2 (OPTION 2B) Introducing the Act Goal: Students will understand the difference between wild spaces and federally designated
More informationExpanding Settlement Growing Mechanization
The Wilderness Act of 1964 Expanding Settlement Growing Mechanization Versus Wilderness protection is paper thin, and the paper should be the best we can get that upon which Congress prints its Acts. David
More informationNatural and Cultural Resources Management, Part 610: Wilderness Stewardship
Natural and Cultural Resources Management, Part 610: Wilderness Stewardship 2.5 May the Service allow structures and installations in wilderness? Section 4(c) of the Wilderness Act generally prohibits
More informationWilderness Areas Designated by the White Pine County bill
Wilderness Areas Designated by the White Pine County bill SEC. 321. SHORT TITLE. This subtitle may be cited as the `Pam White Wilderness Act of 2006'. SEC. 322. FINDINGS. Congress finds that-- The White
More information2.0 PARK VISION AND ROLES
2.0 PARK VISION AND ROLES 2.1 Significance in the Protected Area System Marble Range and Edge Hills provincial parks protect 6.8% of the Pavillion Ranges Ecosection, which is located in the Southern Interior
More informationMINIMUM REQUIREMENTS DECISION GUIDE WORKSHEETS
ARTHUR CARHART NATIONAL WILDERNESS TRAINING CENTER MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS DECISION GUIDE WORKSHEETS Fuel Maintenance Around Red-cockaded Woodpecker Trees on Islands within the Okefenokee Wilderness Area....
More informationNational Park Service Wilderness Action Plan
National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Wilderness Action Plan National Wilderness Steering Committee National Park Service "The mountains can be reached in all seasons.
More informationApril 10, Mark Stiles San Juan Public Lands Center Manager 15 Burnett Court Durango, CO Dear Mark,
Mark Stiles San Juan Public Lands Center Manager 15 Burnett Court Durango, CO 81301 Dear Mark, We are pleased to offer the following comments on the draft San Juan Public Lands Center management plans
More informationTheme: Predominately natural/natural appearing; rustic improvements to protect resources. Size*: 2,500 + acres Infrastructure**:
Recreation Opportunity Spectrum (ROS) Classes The Recreation Opportunity Spectrum (ROS) provides a way to describe the variations in the degree of isolation from the sounds and influences of people, and
More informationAppendix I. Wilderness Review
Appendix I. Wilderness Review This appendix contains the wilderness inventory conducted for the Ash Meadows, Moapa Valley, and Pahranagat National Wildlife Refuges (NWRs) as part of the Comprehensive Conservation
More informationFederal Land and Resource Management: A Primer 1
Federal Land and Resource Management: A Primer 1 RS20002 Coordinated by Ross W. Gorte Natural Resource Economist and Policy Specialist Environment and Natural Resources Policy Division December 22, 1998
More informationMINIMUM REQUIREMENTS DECISION GUIDE WORKSHEETS
ARTHUR CARHART NATIONAL WILDERNESS TRAINING CENTER MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS DECISION GUIDE WORKSHEETS Prescribed burning of islands within Okefenokee Wilderness Area.... except as necessary to meet minimum
More information112th CONGRESS. 1st Session H. R. 113 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
HR 113 IH 112th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 113 To provide for additions to the Cucamonga and Sheep Mountain Wilderness Areas in the Angeles and San Bernardino National Forests and the protection of existing
More informationSuperintendent David Uberuaga June 27, 2011 Grand Canyon National Park P.O. Box 129 Grand Canyon, AZ 86023
Superintendent David Uberuaga June 27, 2011 Grand Canyon National Park P.O. Box 129 Grand Canyon, AZ 86023 Dear Superintendent Uberuaga, Thank you for the opportunity to provide scoping comments on Grand
More informationNational Wilderness Steering Committee
National Wilderness Steering Committee Guidance White Paper Number 1 Issue: Cultural Resources and Wilderness Date: November 30, 2002 Introduction to the Issue Two of the purposes of the National Wilderness
More informationFrench Fire Recovery and Restoration Project Wilderness Resource Impact Analysis
French Fire Recovery and Restoration Project Wilderness Resource Impact Analysis This Wilderness Resource Impact Analysis for the French Recovery and Restoration Project (Project) includes a review of
More informationCentral Cascades Wilderness Strategies Project
Central Cascades Wilderness Strategies Project Wilderness is Unique What makes designated Wilderness different from other national forest lands? Wilderness Act of 1964 to assure that an increasing population
More informationLand Use. Grasslands and Rangelands National Parks and Reserves. Thursday, October 9, 14
Land Use Grasslands and Rangelands National Parks and Reserves MANAGING AND SUSTAINING GRASSLANDS Almost half of the world s livestock graze on natural grasslands (rangelands) and managed grasslands (pastures).
More informationRogue River Access and Management Plan Draft Alternatives
Rogue River Access and Management Plan Draft Alternatives The Rogue River Access and Management Plan was initiated in December, 2011 and is being led by Jackson County Parks (JCP) and Oregon Department
More informationFWS National Wildlife Refuge System Wilderness Fellows
FWS National Wildlife Refuge System Wilderness Fellows Report on Wilderness Character Monitoring Wichita Mountains Wilderness Prepared by: Thomas Jablonowski Wilderness Fellow 43 P a g e U.S. Fish and
More informationAlternative 3 Prohibit Road Construction, Reconstruction, and Timber Harvest Except for Stewardship Purposes B Within Inventoried Roadless Areas
Roadless Area Conservation FEIS Summary Table S-1. Comparison of Key Characteristics and Effects by Prohibition Alternative. The effects summarized in this table A would occur in inventoried roadless areas
More informationRECREATION. Seven issues were identified that pertain to the effects of travel management on outdoor recreation within portions of the project area.
RECREATION Seven issues were identified that pertain to the effects of travel management on outdoor recreation within portions of the project area. OPPORTUNITIES FOR SOLITUDE / QUIET TRAILS. One attraction
More informationRE: Access Fund Comments on Yosemite National Park Wilderness Stewardship Plan, Preliminary Ideas and Concepts
September 30, 2016 Superintendent Yosemite National Park Attn: Wilderness Stewardship Plan P.O. Box 577 Yosemite, CA 95389 RE: Access Fund Comments on Yosemite National Park Wilderness Stewardship Plan,
More informationMINIMUM REQUIREMENTS DECISION GUIDE Instructions
ARTHUR CARHART NATIONAL WILDERNESS TRAINING CENTER MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS DECISION GUIDE Instructions... except as necessary to meet minimum requirements for the administration of the area for the purpose
More informationWilderness Stewardship Plan Handbook
National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Wilderness Stewardship Program Wilderness Stewardship Plan Handbook Planning to Preserve Wilderness Character DRAFT April 2012 Wilderness Stewardship
More informationAPPENDIX W. Wilderness Characteristics Assessment
APPENDIX W Characteristics Assessment Resource Analysis Note: This Appendix was prepared by the. Except for minor stylistic edits made by FERC staff, the is entirely responsible for the analysis and conclusions
More informationDumont Dunes Special Recreation Management Area (SRMA)
Dumont Dunes Special Recreation Management Area (SRMA) RMA/RECREATION MANAGEMENT ZONE (RMZ) OBJECTIVE(S) DECISIONS Objective Statement: Designate this area as a Special Recreation Management Area. To manage
More informationLogo Department Name Agency Organization Organization Address Information 5700 North Sabino Canyon Road
Logo Department Name Agency Organization Organization Address Information United States Forest Coronado National Forest 5700 North Sabino Canyon Road Department of Service Santa Catalina Ranger District
More informationMount Massive Wilderness
SAN ISABEL NATIONAL FOREST & LEADVILLE NATIONAL FISH HATCHERY Mount Massive Wilderness A Report on Wilderness Character Monitoring Elizabeth Mejicano September, 2014 U S D A F O R E S T S E R V I C E &
More informationRecreation Opportunity Spectrum for River Management v
Recreation Opportunity Spectrum for Management v. 120803 Introduction The following Recreation Opportunity Spectrum (ROS) characterizations and matrices mirror the presentation in the ROS Primer and Field
More informationFossil Creek Wild & Scenic River Comprehensive River Management Plan Forest Service Proposed Action - details March 28, 2011
Fossil Creek Wild & Scenic River Comprehensive River Management Plan Forest Service Proposed Action - details March 28, 2011 Primary Goals of the Proposed Action 1. Maintain or enhance ORVs primarily by
More informationPAD-US 1.1 (CBI Edition) Management Designations. National Parks (NPS) and National Park
Noise Sensitive Areas Avoidance Criteria & Source PAD-US 1.1 (CBI Edition) Management Designations Falcon View "DESGINATE" Field Terminology Falcon View Display Category Boundary Waters Canoe Wilderness
More informationKeeping Wilderness Wild: Increasing Effectiveness With Limited Resources
Keeping Wilderness Wild: Increasing Effectiveness With Limited Resources Linda Merigliano Bryan Smith Abstract Wilderness managers are forced to make increasingly difficult decisions about where to focus
More informationWilderness Character and Wilderness Characteristics. What s the difference? Why does it matter?
Introduction Wilderness Character and Wilderness Characteristics What s the difference? Why does it matter? The terms wilderness character and wilderness characteristics are sometimes used interchangeably
More informationWhitemouth Falls Provincial Park. Draft Management Plan
Whitemouth Falls Provincial Park Draft Management Plan Whitemouth Falls Provincial Park Draft Management Plan Table of Contents 1. Introduction... 3 2. Park History... 3 3. Park Attributes... 4 3.1 Natural...
More informationOutdoor Recreation Opportunities Management
Outdoor Recreation Opportunities Management Introduction The natural features of Height of the Rockies and Elk Lakes provincial parks provide a wide variety of outdoor recreational activities. However,
More informationSouth Colony Basin Recreation Fee Proposal
South Colony Basin Recreation Fee Proposal Purpose and Need for Collecting Fees in South Colony Basin: Forest Service appropriated funds have not been sufficient to maintain current recreational services
More informationPinellas County Environmental Lands
Pinellas County Environmental Lands In addition to traditional parks and recreation facilities, Pinellas County owns and manages a system of environmental lands that provides specialized resource-based
More informationLESSON 9 Recognizing Recreational Benefits of Wilderness
LESSON 9 Recognizing Recreational Benefits of Wilderness Objectives: Students will: study, analyze, and compare recreation visitor days (RVD s) for Wilderness areas adjacent to their homes or nearest state,
More informationLESSON 5 Wilderness Management Case Studies
LESSON 5 Wilderness Management Case Studies Objectives: Students will: review the key points of the Wilderness Act of 1964. brainstorm solutions for Wilderness management issues. Materials: Í Leave no
More informationPresidential Proclamation -- Establishment of the Castle Mountains National Monument
Presidential Proclamation -- Establishment of the Castle Mountains National Monument ESTABLISHMENT OF THE CASTLE MOUNTAINS NATIONAL MONUMENT - - - - - - - BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
More information/s/ Robert V. Abbey Director
Form 1221-2 (June 1969) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT MANUAL TRANSMITTAL SHEET Release 6-129 Date 03/15/2012 Subject 6310 Conducting Wilderness Characteristics Inventory
More informationLAKE SURVEY REPORT DRAFT VERSION PRELIMINARY DATA (AS OF 07/24/2018) Fisheries Management. DOW Number: Survey ID Date: 07/16/2018
Fisheries Management LAKE SURVEY REPORT DRAFT VERSION PRELIMINARY DATA (AS OF 7/2/2) Lake Name: Long Survey Type: Standard Survey DOW Number: 3-- Survey ID Date: 7/6/2 Lake Identification Alternate Lake
More informationSpecial Recreation Management Areas Extensive Recreation Management Areas Public Lands Not Designated as Recreation Management Areas
From the Proposed RMP: Special Recreation Management Areas SRMAs are an administrative unit where the existing or proposed recreation opportunities and recreation setting characteristics are recognized
More informationContinental Divide National Scenic Trail Legislative History and Planning Guidance
Continental Divide National Scenic Trail Legislative History and Planning Guidance Legislation, Policy, and Direction Regarding National Scenic Trails The National Trails System Act, P.L. 90-543, was passed
More informationSawtooth National Forest Fairfield Ranger District
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Sawtooth National Forest Fairfield Ranger District P.O. Box 189 Fairfield, ID. 83327 208-764-3202 Fax: 208-764-3211 File Code: 1950/7700 Date: December
More informationThe following criteria were used to identify Benchmark Areas:
7.0 BENCHMARK AREAS The Churn Creek Protected Area offers a significant opportunity to learn more about how grassland ecosystems function. One of the key tools that will be used to monitor larger grassland
More informationDOW Number: Survey ID Date: 08/21/2018. Windom Southern
Fisheries Management DRAFT VERSION PRELIMINARY DATA (AS OF /4/) Lake Name: Hall Survey Type: Standard Survey DOW Number: 4-- Survey ID Date: // Lake Identification Alternate Lake Name: Primary Lake Class
More informationRule Governing the Designation and Establishment of All-Terrain Vehicle Use Trails on State Land
Rule Governing the Designation and Establishment of All-Terrain Vehicle Use Trails on State Land 1.0 Authority 1.1 This rule is promulgated pursuant to 23 V.S.A. 3506. Section 3506 (b)(4) states that an
More informationPreferred Recreation Recommendations Stemilt-Squilchuck Recreation Plan March 2018
Preferred Recreation Recommendations Stemilt-Squilchuck Recreation Plan March 2018 Below are the recommended recreation ideas and strategies that package together the various recreation concepts compiled
More informationBig Sandy Ranch Mohave County, Arizona
Big Sandy Ranch Mohave County, Arizona Photo [9] Deeded land on hillside within the River Ranch parcel Listed for sale exclusively by: Traegen Knight Headquarters West Ltd. PO BOX 1980 St. Johns, AZ 85936
More informationHEADQUARTERS WEST LTD. CATTLE RANCHES HORSE PROPERTIES RURAL REAL ESTATE
Aravaipa Creek Flowing Through the Property Offered for sale exclusively by: Sandy Ruppel Headquarters West, Ltd. PO BOX 542 Sonoita, AZ 85637 Phone (520) 444-1745 sandy@headquarterswest.com www.headquarterswest.com
More informationDaisy Dean Trail 628/619 ATV Trail Construction
Background and Purpose and Need The Daisy Dean ATV Trail Construction Project is located in the Little Belt Mountains, Musselshell Ranger District, Lewis and Clark National Forest approximately 32 miles
More informationPhoenix Habitat Restoration Projects
Phoenix Habitat Restoration Projects Spur Cross Ranch Cave Creek (Estergard) Regional Tree and Shade Summit March 9, 2010 Desert Riparian Ecosystems Healthy riparian areas like this once existed along
More informationYard Creek Provincial Park. Management Plan
Yard Creek Provincial Park Management Plan Draft January 2010 Yard Creek Provincial Park Management Plan Approved by: telàlsemkin/siyam/chief Scott Benton Bill Williams Squamish Executive Director ation
More informationROAD AND TRAIL PROJECT APPROVAL
ROAD AND TRAIL PROJECT APPROVAL www.marincountyparks.org Marin County Parks, 3501 Civic Center Dr, Suite 260, San Rafael, CA 94903 DATE: July 12, 2017 PRESERVE: Gary Giacomini Open Space Preserve PROJECT:
More informationSteve Holdsambeck District Ranger Spring Mountains National Recreation Area
EXHIBIT C1 TESTIMONY ON RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES ON THE SPRING MOUNTAINS NATIONAL RECREATION AREA HUMBOLDT-TOIYABE NATIONAL FOREST FOR THE LEGISLATIVE COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC LANDS May 28, 2004 Steve
More informationProposed Scotchman Peaks Wilderness Act 2016 (S.3531)
1 Proposed Scotchman Peaks Wilderness Act 2016 (S.3531) Frequently Asked Questions PLACE Where is the area that would be designated as Wilderness? The lands outlined in S.3531 lie within Idaho along its
More informationWelcome and thank you for being here! Kick-Off Public Workshop November 19, 2014
Welcome and thank you for being here! Kick-Off Public Workshop November 19, 2014 OPEN SPACE MATTERS: Boise s First Reserve Master Plan Julia Grant Foothills and Open Space Manager City of Boise Ellen Campfield
More informationMinimum Requirements References in National Park Service Policy
Minimum Requirements References in National Park Service Policy 2006 NPS Management Policies Chapter 6: Wilderness Preservation and Management 6.3 Wilderness Resource Management 6.3.1 General Policy (in
More informationEXECUTIVE SUMMARY PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT REPORT PURPOSE EXISTING SETTING EXPANDING PARKLAND
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT REPORT PURPOSE As the culmination of the first phase of the master planning process, this Program Development Report creates the framework to develop the Calero County
More informationKANANASKIS COUNTRY PROVINCIAL RECREATION AREAS MANAGEMENT PLAN DRAFT TERMS OF REFERENCE - November 20, 2007
KANANASKIS COUNTRY PROVINCIAL RECREATION AREAS MANAGEMENT PLAN DRAFT TERMS OF REFERENCE - November 20, 2007 BACKGROUND There are 42 Provincial Recreation Areas (PRAs) within Kananaskis Country located
More informationCat Island Chain Background & Access Guide
Cat Chain Background & Access Guide Brown County Port & Resource Recovery Department 2561 S. Broadway, Green Bay, WI 54304 (920) 492-4950 www.portofgreenbay.com January 2018 1 Restoration of the Cat Chain
More informationWilderness. Muddy Mountains. Final. Wilderness Management Plan and Environmental Assessment NPS. April 24, U.S. Department of the Interior
NPS Muddy Mountains Final Wilderness Wilderness Management Plan and Environmental Assessment U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Nevada State Office Las Vegas Field Office National
More informationDecision Memo Broken Wheel Ranch Equestrian Outfitter Special-Use Permit Proposed Action
Decision Memo Broken Wheel Ranch Equestrian Outfitter Special-Use Permit USDA Forest Service Mississippi Bluffs Ranger District, Shawnee National Forest Jackson and Union Counties, Illinois Proposed Action
More informationMinnesota Department of Natural Resources
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Fisheries Management LAKE SURVEY REPORT DRAFT VERSION - PRELIMINARY DATA (AS OF 7//26) Lake Name: Loon Survey Type: Standard Survey DOW Number: 32-2- Survey ID
More information(Short Listing) DUPUYER ACREAGE, ROCKY MOUNTAN FRONT
(Short Listing) DUPUYER ACREAGE, ROCKY MOUNTAN FRONT This unique property is located 8½ miles northwest of Dupuyer, Montana and approximately thirty 30 miles northwest of Choteau, Montana. Great Falls
More informationAffected Environment and Environmental Consequences
Chapter 3. Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences 3.1 Introduction This chapter evaluates key issues involved in the route alternatives for a snowmobile trail between McFarland Lake and South
More informationProposed Backcountry Area Definition and Guidelines
Proposed Backcountry Area Definition and Guidelines Proposed Backcountry Area Definition and Guidelines A Backcountry Area is proposed as a section of state land where the size and quality of the landscape
More informationA summary of Draft Makara Peak Mountain Bike Park Master Plan
A summary of Draft Makara Peak Mountain Bike Park Master Plan OVEMBER 216 Image: Peter Marshall 2 3 Introduction Since it was established in 1998, the Makara Peak Mountain Bike Park (Makara Peak) has grown
More informationAppendix I Case-Studies in Wilderness Management
Appendix I Case-Studies in Wilderness Management Management Issue Scenarios Note: These scenarios are meant to be used as guidelines for the program leader rather than to be read verbatim. Introduce a
More informationFREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT WILDERNESS CHARACTER MONITORING
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT WILDERNESS CHARACTER MONITORING WHAT IS WILDERNESS CHARACTER? What is wilderness character? The Wilderness Act does not define wilderness character and despite a rich legislative
More informationMAIN LAKE PROVINCIAL PARK
MAIN LAKE PROVINCIAL PARK PURPOSE STATEMENT AND ZONING PLAN March 2003 MAIN LAKE PROVINCIAL PARK Purpose Statement and Zoning Plan Primary Role The primary role of Main Lake Park is to protect a biologically
More informationMANAGEMENT DIRECTION STATEMENT June, 1999
Thompson River District MANAGEMENT DIRECTION STATEMENT June, 1999 for Clearwater River Corridor (Addition to Wells Gray Park) Ministry of Environment Lands and Parks BC Parks Division ii Table of Contents
More information4/1/2009. Wilderness Character
Monitoring Social Conditions in Wilderness Troy Hall March, 2009 CSS 490 Overview outstanding opportunities Indicators & data collection Data analysis 1 Wilderness Character Natural Untrammeled Undeveloped
More informationWhitefish Range Partnership Tentatively Approved by WRP 11/18/2013!Rec. Wilderness Page 1
Whitefish Range Partnership Tentatively Approved by WRP 11/18/2013!Rec. Wilderness Page 1 Recommended Wilderness Background The Whitefish Range has a long management and legislative history associated
More informationFlow Stand Up Paddle Board Parkway Plan Analysis
Regional Parks Department Jeffrey R. Leatherman, Director County of Sacramento Divisions Administration Golf Leisure Services Maintenance Rangers Therapeutic Recreation Services Flow Stand Up Paddle Board
More informationPROPOSED ACTION South 3000 East Salt Lake City, UT United States Department of Agriculture
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest Salt Lake Ranger District 6944 South 3000 East Salt Lake City, UT 84121 801-733-2660 File Code: 1950/2300 Date:
More informationAMERICAN S PARTICIPATION IN OUTDOOR RECREATION: Results From NSRE 2000 (With weighted data) (Round 1)
AMERICAN S PARTICIPATION IN OUTDOOR RECREATION: Results From NSRE 2000 (With weighted data) (Round 1) The emphasis of this report is on participation patterns across activities and segments of our society.
More informationCamping Freshwater Fishing Big Game Hunting VIII. Summary Decision
Camping........ - 17 - Freshwater Fishing....... - 18 - Big Game Hunting........ - 19 - VIII. Summary Decision........ - 20 - Appendix 1 - Wilderness Management Direction. - 21 - The Wilderness Act of
More informationFederal Outdoor Recreation Trends Effects on Economic Opportunities
United States Department of Agriculture Federal Outdoor Recreation Trends Effects on Economic Opportunities The Forest Service National Center for Natural Resources Economic Research is assisting the Federal
More informationConservation Area Management Statement
Conservation Area Management Statement Miller Creek Wildlife Area Resolution #: Approval: Issue Date: Date of Last Revision: Table of Contents 1. Purpose....... 1 2. Property Description...... 1 2.1. Legal
More informationMinnesota Department of Natural Resources
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Fisheries Management LAKE SURVEY REPORT DRAFT VERSION - PRELIMINARY DATA (AS OF /4/2) Lake Name: Talcot Survey Type: Standard Survey DOW Number: -- Survey ID Date:
More informationSTEENS MOUNTAIN TRAVEL MANAGEMENT PLAN
STEENS MOUNTAIN TRAVEL MANAGEMENT PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT OR-05-027-021 Bureau of Land Management Burns District Office 28910 Hwy 20 West Hines, Oregon 97738 April 15, 2007 Table of Contents Chapter
More informationTABLE COUNTY REGIONAL PARKS AND COMMUNITY PARKS IN THE DESERT REGION
The purpose of this Section is to identify existing recreation opportunities within the Project area, analyze potential impacts to recreation associated with the development of the proposed Project, and
More informationMONTEREY REGIONAL AIRPORT MASTER PLAN TOPICAL QUESTIONS FROM THE PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE AND TOPICAL RESPONSES
MONTEREY REGIONAL AIRPORT MASTER PLAN TOPICAL QUESTIONS FROM THE PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE AND TOPICAL RESPONSES Recurring topics emerged in some of the comments and questions raised by members of the
More informationWashakie Wilderness Ranch
Washakie Wilderness Ranch Dubois, Wyoming Fly Fishing Hunting Ranching Conservation Washakie Wilderness Ranch Dubois, Wyoming Introduction: A stunning 160-acre parcel located at the base of the Ramshorn
More informationMANAGEMENT DIRECTION STATEMENT June, 1999
Thompson River District MANAGEMENT DIRECTION STATEMENT June, 1999 for Roche Lake Provincial Park Ministry of Environment Lands and Parks BC Parks Division Table of Contents I. Introduction A. Setting
More information