David Johnson. Tom, Attached please find the final scoping letter and figures for your review. David

Similar documents
1803 West Hwy 160 Monte Vista, CO (719) TTY (719)

White Mountain National Forest Saco Ranger District

Sawtooth National Forest Fairfield Ranger District

White Mountain National Forest Saco Ranger District

Bradley Brook Relocation Project. Scoping Notice. Saco Ranger District. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service

Mt. Hood National Forest

PROPOSED ACTION South 3000 East Salt Lake City, UT United States Department of Agriculture

Section II. Planning & Public Process Planning for the Baker/Carver Regional Trail began in 2010 as a City of Minnetrista initiative.

The Chu property is a 6.57 acre parcel located in the Town of Superior on the west side of McCaslin Boulevard. In 2014, the Town of Superior acquired

Buffalo Pass Trails Project

TONGASS NATIONAL FOREST

BACKGROUND DECISION. Decision Memo Page 1 of 6

SUMMER VILLAGE OF SILVER SANDS. Municipal Development Plan

National Forests and Grasslands in Texas

White Mountain National Forest. Pond of Safety Accessible Trail & Shoreline Access Project. Scoping Report. Township of Randolph Coos County, NH

White Mountain National Forest. Rumney Rocks Project Supplemental Environmental Assessment. 30-day Comment Report

April 10, Mark Stiles San Juan Public Lands Center Manager 15 Burnett Court Durango, CO Dear Mark,

COMMENT PERIOD INTRODUCTION

Description of the Proposed Action for the Big Creek / Yellow Pine Travel Plan (Snow-free Season) and Big Creek Ford Project

Proposed Action. Payette National Forest Over-Snow Grooming in Valley, Adams and Idaho Counties. United States Department of Agriculture

Williamson Rock/Pacific Crest National Scenic Trail (PCT) Project EIS. Notice of intent to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement.

USDA United States ~ Department of A riculture

Report to the Strategic Development Committee

Cascade River State Park Management Plan Amendment

Parkland County Municipal Development Plan Amendment Acheson Industrial Area Structure Plan

Tahoe National Forest Over-Snow Vehicle Use Designation

One East First Street Reno, NV

Daisy Dean Trail 628/619 ATV Trail Construction

White Mountain National Forest

French Fire Recovery and Restoration Project Wilderness Resource Impact Analysis

Crown Lands and Property Agency. Name Client # LAST (Please Print) FIRST MIDDLE (no initials) Mailing Address. Postal Code

Report to the Strategic Development Committee

Decision Memo Ice Age Trail Improvement (CRAC 37)

Planning and Building Department

Decision Memo Broken Wheel Ranch Equestrian Outfitter Special-Use Permit Proposed Action

MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE

Wilderness Process #NP-1810: Your letter ID is NP September 5, 2018

Francis Marion and Sumter National Forests

Finn Creek Park. Management Direction Statement Amendment

To: Cam Hooley From: Trails 2000 Date: September 30, 2016 Re: Hermosa Comments. Dear Cam:

2. Goals and Policies. The following are the adopted Parks and Trails Goals for Stillwater Township:

Preferred Recreation Recommendations Stemilt-Squilchuck Recreation Plan March 2018

Emily to Blind Lake Trail PROPOSED TRAIL DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY

PUBLIC INFORMATION SESSION #2

Decision Memo for Desolation Trail: Mill D to Desolation Lake Trail Relocation

Roadless Area Conservation; National Forest System Lands in Alaska. ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement.

Conservation Area Management Statement

RIM TRAIL EXTENSION PROJECT

Table 1: Iron Mountain Communication Site. Latitude 1 Longitude 1 Elev 2 Address T/R/S 3 APN 4 USGS Quadrangle

Great Wolf Lodge Fact Sheet & Frequently Asked Questions Potential Location in Gilroy, California 8/30/17

Public Notice ISSUED: December 10, 2018 EXPIRES: January 9, 2019

APPENDIX OFFICIAL MAP ORDINANCE OF HAMILTONBAN TOWNSHIP OFFICIAL MAP NARRATIVE

Header i

BUCK POINT RANCH. Aspen Associates Realty

DATE: January 19, WCA Governing Board. Johnathan Perisho, Project Manager. Mark Stanley, Executive Officer

APPENDIX L. Wilderness Fact Sheets

At the time, the portion of the line through Eagle County remains wholly under the ownership of Union Pacific Railroad (UP).

Rule Governing the Designation and Establishment of All-Terrain Vehicle Use Trails on State Land

RECREATIONAL VEHICLE RESORT DISTRICT R-RVR. Lacombe County Land Use Bylaw No: 1237/17 Date Adopted: July 6, Page 111

112th CONGRESS. 1st Session H. R. 113 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

Office of Commercial Space Transportation: Notice of Availability, Notice of Public

Request for Proposals

FINAL TESTIMONY 1 COMMITTEE ON RESOURCES UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES. July 13, 2005 CONCERNING. Motorized Recreational Use of Federal Lands

March 14, SUBJECT: Public input to the Bureau of Land Management, Gunnison Field Office, Travel Management Plan

White Mountain National Forest Androscoggin and Evans Notch Ranger Districts

Napa County Planning Commission Board Agenda Letter

Kelly Motorized Trails Project Proposed Action

STAFF REPORT. Airport Land Use Consistency Determination Betteravia Plaza. MEETING DATE: January 21, 2016 AGENDA ITEM: 8D

MONTEREY REGIONAL AIRPORT MASTER PLAN TOPICAL QUESTIONS FROM THE PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE AND TOPICAL RESPONSES

URBAN DESIGN REPORT. Proposed Residential Development, Old Church Road, Caledon East

DECISION MEMO. Rawhide Trail #7073 Maintenance and Reconstruction

Ottawa National Forest Supervisor s Office

Longmont to Boulder Regional Trail Jay Road Connection DRAFT FINAL REPORT

RUSHMORE CONNECTOR TRAIL PROPOSAL

H. R IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

Georgia Landowners Actively Courting Casinos In Anticipation Of Gambling Legalization

MASSACHUSETTS PORT AUTHORITY REQUEST FOR LETTERS OF INTEREST DEVELOPMENT OF THE MASSPORT MARINE TERMINAL

Agenda Report. Spruce Street Outlet Drainage Improvements Tower Road Relief Sewer

Wilderness Areas Designated by the White Pine County bill

Dan Dallas, Supervisor July 3, 2017 Rio Grande National Forest 1803 W. Highway 160 Monte Vista, CO 81144

Brinker Creek Ranch. Colorado - Routt County - Yampa

GOLDEN BACKCOUNTRY RECREATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE (GBRAC)

MEETING MINUTES Page 1 of 5

Silver Creek Plunge Campground Reconstruction

Part Three : COMMUNITY PLAN AREAS AND SPECIAL STUDY AREAS SACRAMENTO 2030 GENERAL PLAN. Introduction

S Central Coast Heritage Protection Act APRIL 21, 2016

Decision Memo Sun Valley Super Enduro & Cross-Country Mountain Bike Race. Recreation Event

National Forests in North Carolina Pisgah National Forest Appalachian Ranger District Burnsville Station

ROAD AND TRAIL PROJECT APPROVAL

FEASIBILITY CRITERIA

Kinross acquires mining rights to land adjacent Fort Knox mine, adds more than 2 million ounces to mineral resource estimates

Staff Report Sign Design

Dear Reviewing Officer:

CHAPTER 6 NOISE EXPOSURE

Draft Concept Alternatives Analysis for the Inaugural Airport Program September 2005

Piedra River Protection Workgroup Meeting #5 Feb. 21, 2012 Ross Aragon Community Center, Pagosa Springs

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2019 Request for Proposals (RFP)

Mountain City, Ruby Mountains and Jarbidge Ranger Districts Combined Travel Management Project Final Environmental Impact Statement Summary Report

FILE NO. ANMICALGIC-1

Decision Memo for Philmont Scout Ranch Bike Trail and Access Reroute Project

Transcription:

David Johnson From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments: David Johnson <david@westerneco.com> Tuesday, April 12, 2011 4:33 PM Thomas Malecek Dave Dyer; Jason Marks (jmarks@segroup.com) VWC Scoping Letter Village @ Wolf Creek Final Scoping Notice.doc; Fig1.pdf; Fig2.pdf; Fig3.pdf Tom, Attached please find the final scoping letter and figures for your review. David 1

USDA Forest Service Divide Ranger District http://www.fs.fed.us/r2/riogrande 13308 West Highway 160 Del Norte, CO 81132 719-657-3321 TTY 657-6038 USDI Bureau of Land Management San Luis Resource Area File Code: 1950-3 Date: April 13, 2011 RE: Village at Wolf Creek Land Exchange Proposal Dear Interested Public: The Rio Grande National Forest (RGNF) has received a proposal from the Leavell-McCombs Joint Venture (LMJV) to exchange Federal lands for non-federal lands referred to as The Village at Wolf Creek Land Exchange Proposal and is initiating an environmental review as mandated by the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). In compliance with NEPA, a notice of intent (NOI) to prepare an environmental impact statement (EIS) will be published in the Federal Register on or about April 15, 2011. Feedback from the public is critical in this early stage of the NEPA process, and the RGNF is soliciting your input so that a thorough environmental analysis can be prepared to document potential impacts to the physical, human and biological environment. Public comments on this proposal will help the Forest Supervisor make an informed decision. This scoping notice includes information on the Proposed Action, an alternative to the Proposed Action, the Purpose and Need for Action, and how to comment in a meaningful way. Maps of the project are included, as well as dates and locations for three public open houses, where interested public are encouraged to attend to learn more about the project. BACKGROUND In 1986, a Decision Notice for the Environmental Assessment of the Proposed Wolf Creek Land Exchange allowed the conveyance of 300 acres of National Forest System (NFS) land adjacent to the Wolf Creek Ski Area (WCSA) in exchange for non-federal lands located within the Saguache Ranger District. In 2004, the Forest Service initiated an EIS in response to a request for legal access to the property, under the Alaska National Interests Lands Conservation Act (ANILCA), in order to allow the private landowners the ability to begin development of the Village at Wolf Creek. In March 2006, a Record of Decision (ROD) was signed, approving transportation and utility corridors across NFS lands. In February 2008, as part of a Settlement Agreement, the ROD was withdrawn. In September 2008, the Forest Service initiated a new EIS after receiving a new application for permanent road access from the proponent. Early in the project analysis, the project was placed on indefinite hold pending new information and potentially a new application. LMJV has submitted this current land exchange proposal as an alternative to an ANILCA easement, as the Federal parcel abuts Highway 160. Caring for the Land and Serving People Printed on Recycled Paper

SCOPE OF THE PROJECT AND DECISION TO BE MADE Although the RGNF received a proposal for the land exchange from a private entity, this is now a Forest Service Proposed Action, which will be analyzed in detail in an EIS. The EIS will analyze potential impacts to the physical, human and biological environment that may result from implementation of the Proposed Action. Issues raised during this public scoping period may generate additional alternatives that will be considered along with the Proposed Action. A Record of Decision (ROD) will be issued following completion of the analysis in the EIS. Based on the analysis in the EIS, the Responsible Official (the Forest Supervisor for the RGNF) will decide whether to authorize the Proposed Action, the No Action Alternative (required in an EIS), or any action alternative(s) given detailed analysis in the document. PURPOSE OF AND NEED FOR ACTION As the owner of a private inholding, the non-federal party has a legal right to access under ANILCA, which provides for: access to non-federally owned land within the boundaries of the National Forest System to secure to the owner the reasonable use and enjoyment thereof Therefore, the RGNF s Purpose and Need for Action is to allow the non-federal party to access its property as legally entitled, while minimizing environmental effects to natural resources within the project area. Any method of accommodating access to private land in the project area needs to be cognizant of, and sensitive to, the operations and recreational experiences at Wolf Creek Ski Area, which is adjacent to the non-federal parcel and operates under a Special Use Permit from the RGNF. PROPOSED ACTION LAND EXCHANGE Given the non-federal party s legal right to access its property and the RGNF s legal obligation to provide access to the inholding, the RGNF believes that a land exchange may be in the public interest and thus merits additional evaluation. Potential public benefits of a land exchange include: development of private lands would be moved further east from Wolf Creek Ski Area, helping minimize impacts to skiers and ski area operations. the land exchange would focus residential development and associated infrastructure in an area that is more suitable due to topography, natural resources, and proximity to US Highway 160. the proposed land exchange would lead to a net gain of wetlands and perennial streams in public ownership. the proposed exchange would accommodate a lower density development. the land exchange would obviate the need for ANILCA access. The Proposed Action involves the conveyance of approximately 178 acres of non-federal lands to the United States in exchange for NFS lands totaling approximately 204 acres. Upon conveyance of the non-federal parcel to the United States, the newly acquired NFS lands would be managed by the RGNF per its 1996 Land and Resource Management Plan. The lands proposed for inclusion in the land exchange are summarized below and shown on the attached maps. 2

Non-Federal Lands Proposed to be Conveyed to the United States: Township 37 North, Range 2 East, N.M.P.M., Mineral, Colorado Sections 4, 5, 8, and 9: A portion of Tract 37 Total Area: Approximately 178 acres In total, the non-federal parcel is approximately 300 acres in size, of which approximately 178 acres are proposed to be conveyed to the United States. The non-federal parcel is located approximately 20 miles southwest of South Fork and 25 miles northeast of Pagosa Springs in Mineral, Colorado. The non-federal parcel is located just east of Wolf Creek Pass at approximately 10,300 feet in elevation and is comprised of spruce-fir forest, open meadows and wetlands. The non-federal parcel adjoins NFS lands on all sides and abuts/overlaps the Wolf Creek Ski Area. Alberta Park Reservoir is located on NFS lands to the east. Federal Lands Proposed to be Conveyed by the United States to the Non-Federal Party: Township 37 North, Range 2 East, N.M.P.M., Mineral, Colorado Sections 3, 4, 5, and 9: A portion thereof Total Area: Approximately 204 acres The 204-acre Federal parcel is just north and east of the non-federal parcel, with the remaining portion of the Non-Federal party s land separating the two. The Federal parcel is immediately contiguous to US Highway 160 and has similar habitat types as the non-federal parcel. ALTERNATIVE TO THE PROPOSED ACTION - PERMANENT EASEMENT TO THE NON-FEDERAL PARCEL (ANILCA ALTERNATIVE) As an alternative to a land exchange, the RGNF will analyze a potential ANILCA easement across NFS lands that would accommodate access to, and development of, the non-federal parcel. COMMON TO BOTH ALTERNATIVES LMJV s conceptual plan for the Village at Wolf Creek indicates that full build-out would include a four-season resort with a variety of hotels, homes and condominiums; approximately 200,000 square feet of commercial space; and ancillary infrastructure such as roads, water treatment and storage, wastewater treatment and disposal, and power distribution. A grade separated interchange off Highway 160 capable of handling full build-out traffic estimates will be required to be built from the very beginning of development COMMENT PERIOD The NEPA process provides the public with an opportunity to comment on the Proposed Action and provides a basis for sound decision-making by the Responsible Official. The RGNF is providing a 45-day comment period for the public to submit comments on this Proposed Action. We encourage your involvement in this scoping process and are interested in any information related to the proposal that you would like to provide. Providing tangible and verifiable information is the most helpful way to contribute to a high-quality, informed decision. We 3

welcome comments at any time during the NEPA process; however, comments will be most effective if received by: May 31, 2011 To be most effective when submitting comments, please include: (1) name, address, and organization represented, if any; (2) the title of the project for which the comment is being submitted; and (3) specific facts, concerns or issues, and supporting reasons for the Responsible Official to consider. Written, facsimile, hand-delivered and electronic comments will be accepted. Please send comments to: Dan Dallas, Forest Supervisor c/o Tom Malecek, Divide District Ranger Rio Grande National Forest 13308 West Highway 160 Del Norte, CO 81132 Electronic comments can be submitted, but must be in a format such as an email message, plain text (.txt), rich text format (.rtf), MS-Word (.doc) or Adobe Acrobat (.pdf) to: comments-rockymountain-rio-grande@fs.fed.us. Please include Village at Wolf Creek Land Exchange Proposal in the subject line of the e-mail. Only those persons who submit comments during this comment period will be placed on the mailing list for future information regarding this project. Names and contact information submitted with comments will become part of the public record and may be released under the Freedom of Information Act. HOW TO GET MORE INFORMATION The Proposed Action, Purpose and Need for Action, and maps may be downloaded from the Rio Grande NF's web site at: http://www.fs.fed.us/r2/riogrande/. If you have questions about the NEPA process or making comments, please contact project manager Cambria Armstrong, at (970) 295-6768. PUBLIC OPEN HOUSES Three public open houses will be held during the scoping period to offer the public an opportunity to learn more about this proposal. Representatives from the RGNF will be present to answer questions and provide information throughout the evening. The dates, times and locations of these open houses are: April 25 th Creede Community Center April 26 th Aragon Recreation Center in Pagosa Springs 4:30 7:00 pm 4:30 7:00 pm April 27 th Rio Grande Annex Building, Del Norte 4:30 7:00 pm Each open house is intended to provide the public with information regarding the proposal. 4

Thank you for your participation in this project. Sincerely, Dan Dallas Rio Grande National Forest Supervisor Attachments (3) 5

U.S. Hwy 160 Private Land Parcel Vicinity Map Scale: 1:1,150,000 Mineral Creede Project Site Pagosa Springs Archuleta South Fork Saguache Del Norte Rio Grande Conejos Wolf Creek Ski Area Special Use Permit Boundary COLORADO Map Location 1:24,000 Date: April 2011 Scale: Base: USGS 7.5' Wolk Creek Quadrangle ² Figure 1. Existing Conditions Map Village at Wolf Creek Land Exchange USDA Forest Service Divide Ranger District http://www.fs.fed.us/r2/riogrande

U.S. Hwy 160 National Forest Land Federal Exchange Parcel Not to be Exchanged Private Non-Federal Exchange Parcel Vicinity Map Scale: 1:1,150,000 Mineral Creede Project Site Pagosa Springs Archuleta South Fork Saguache Del Norte Rio Grande Conejos Wolf Creek Ski Area Special Use Permit Boundary COLORADO Map Location 1:24,000 Date: April 2011 Scale: Base: USGS 7.5' Wolk Creek Quadrangle ² Figure 2. Exchange Parcels Map Village at Wolf Creek Land Exchange USDA Forest Service Divide Ranger District http://www.fs.fed.us/r2/riogrande

U.S. Hwy 160 Potential Area for Access Private Land Parcel Vicinity Map Scale: 1:1,150,000 Mineral Creede Project Site Pagosa Springs Archuleta South Fork Saguache Del Norte Rio Grande Conejos Wolf Creek Ski Area Special Use Permit Boundary COLORADO Map Location 1:24,000 Date: April 2011 Scale: Base: USGS 7.5' Wolk Creek Quadrangle Figure 3. Non-Federal Parcel & Potential Access Area ² Village at Wolf Creek Land Exchange USDA Forest Service Divide Ranger District http://www.fs.fed.us/r2/riogrande