Buffalo Pass Trails Project
|
|
- Magnus York
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Buffalo Pass Trails Project Hahns Peak/Bears Ears Ranger District, Medicine Bow-Routt National Forests and Thunder Basin National Grassland Routt County, Colorado T6N 83W Sections 3-5, 8; T6N 84W Sections 1, 2, 11; T7N 83W Sections 27-29, 32-35; T7N 84W Sections 25-26, Comments Welcome The Hahns Peak/Bears Ears Ranger District of the Routt National Forest welcomes your comments on the Buffalo Pass Trails Project to develop and manage recreation trails in the Buffalo Pass area. The project will advance Forest Service goals, objectives, and desired conditions for recreation and other resources. Your comments will help us identify issues associated with the Proposed Action, identify potential alternatives, and determine the appropriate level of analysis required for this project. Instructions for submitting comments are provided at the end of this notice. Background The Buffalo Pass area is one of the closest portals to the Routt National Forest from the community of Steamboat Springs, Colorado. Access is via National Forest System Road (NFSR) 60, or the Spring Creek Trail (National Forest System Trail (NFST) 1160) which begins in city limits and ends at the Dry Lake area (Figure 1). Designated trails in this popular area are currently limited to the previously mentioned Spring Creek Trail and the Wyoming Trail (NFST 1101) located near the summit of Buffalo Pass, eight miles east of the Dry Lake area. Due to the proximity to town and popularity of the area, a series of non-system trails have been created by recreationists (see Purpose and Need). Several groups have expressed interest in partnering with the Hahns Peak/Bears Ears Ranger District to improve the trails in the Steamboat Springs area. This interest, plus resource impacts associated with existing user created trails, compelled the Forest Service to evaluate trail resources across the District. In 2014, the International Mountain Bike Association (IMBA) assessed existing trails and developed a conceptual plan for bike trails within a 30-minute radius of Steamboat Springs. The Forest Service hosted a public meeting in August of 2014 allowing user groups and the general public to identify and discuss trail proposals and issues. Over 400 miles of new trails were identified by trail users. Proposals and concepts by interested parties were then assessed
2 Figure 1. Buffalo Pass area proposed trails (Alternative 2).
3 for feasibility and prioritized by the Forest Service. The outcome is a comprehensive list of action items for over the next years for trails management on the District including resolving existing conflicts, identifying necessary improvements, and developing a more sustainable trail system over the long-term. A sustainable trail system is one that minimizes impacts on resources and requires minimal maintenance. From these efforts, the Buffalo Pass area was identified by the Forest Service as a top priority for both resource protection and opportunities for partnerships. Steamboat Trails Alliance (STA) input, IMBA s assessment, public input, and Forest Service staff concerns were considered to propose a series of trails that would meet public desires and also address resource issues. Purpose and Need for Action The purpose of this project is to provide for trail-based recreation needs by developing and managing a sustainable, designated trail system in the Buffalo Pass area near Steamboat Springs, Colorado. As discussed above, designated trails in this area are currently limited. The project would also address recreational impacts in the area including illegal trail building and use, and cross country travel by mountain bikes. A series of non-system trails have been created by recreationists, primarily from unrestricted cross country riding. Generally, these trails are not meeting Forest Service standards for sustainability and are leading to erosion and impacts to hydrology, vegetation, soils, and other resources. Forest Service regulations prohibit the unauthorized construction and maintenance of trails, but no regulations prohibiting the use of mountain bikes off of designated routes have been established on the Routt National Forest. If the existing trails and recreation activities are left unmanaged, unauthorized trail construction and associated resource impacts will likely continue in this area. The project would advance Forest Service goals, objectives, and desired conditions in the 1997 Routt National Forest Revised Land and Resource Management Plan (Forest Plan). See Management Direction in this document for further information. Project Area The Buffalo Pass Trails Project analysis area is located on the Hahns Peak/Bears Ears Ranger District of the Medicine Bow-Routt National Forests and Thunder Basin National Grassland in Routt County, approximately one mile northeast of Steamboat Springs, Colorado, in Townships 6 & 7 North, Ranges 83 & 84 West, 6 th PM (Figure 1). The analysis area occurs in the Middle Yampa Geographic Area of the Routt National Forest. According to the Forest Plan (page 3-54), this 95,040-acre area is dominated by spruce/fir (46%), aspen (23%), lodgepole pine (11%), and grass and forbs (10%). Unique features of the Middle Yampa GA include, but are not limited to, diverse recreation opportunities, a rural-urban boundary along the Yampa River Valley, the Steamboat Ski Area, low motorized travel route density, and domestic water supply provided by the watershed (Forest Plan, 3-54). 3
4 Management Direction The project will be designed to meet Forest Plan goals, objectives, and desired conditions. The project would advance Regional and Forest-wide direction by: Providing for multiple-uses and sustainability of National Forests and grasslands in an environmentally acceptable manner (Regional Goal #2) (Forest Plan, 1-1) Providing for scenic quality and a range of recreation opportunities which respond to the needs of National Forest customers and local communities (Regional Goal #4) (Forest Plan, 1-1) Providing a wide variety of outdoor recreational opportunities and experiences to meet the full range of visitor experiences (Forest-wide Goal #2) (Forest Plan, 1-1) o Identifying appropriate programs and compatible levels of use for Forest recreation and resource programs in collaboration with user groups, communities, and other agencies (Forest-wide Objective) (Forest Plan 1-1) Managing trail development at a broad scale to coordinate with trail systems developed by municipalities, counties, states, other federal agencies and partners. (Dispersed Recreation Guideline #3) (Forest Plan 1-19) Considering proximity to population centers, feasibility of loop trails, types of trail users to be served, and other factors in the development of new trails (Dispersed Recreation Guideline #6) (Forest Plan 1-20) Forest plan geographic area and management area direction in the project area emphasize providing for recreation opportunities (primarily non-motorized) while minimizing environmental effects on wildlife, vegetation, water quality, scenery, and other resource values. Forest Plan standards and guidelines would be applied to the proposal as appropriate. Forest Service Manuals and Handbooks for recreation provide further direction relevant to this proposal. Forest Service Manual (FSM) Recreation, Wilderness and Related Resource Management outlines the authority, objectives and policy for providing a wide array of outdoor recreational opportunities, sustaining natural and cultural resources and deepening public stewardship by working with non-profit partners. FSM 2350 Trail, River and Similar Recreational Opportunities provides more specific direction to Forest Service trails programs to coordinate with local communities to provide a variety of trail opportunities to meet the public need and meet land management and recreation policy objectives by providing a trail system that is environmentally, socially and financially sustainable. It also states a policy of not maintaining unauthorized trails. Forest Service Handbook (FSH) Trails Management Handbook specifies how to plan, develop and maintain a trail system following the five Trail Fundamentals: Trail Type, Trail Class, Managed Use, Designed Use and Design parameters. Proposed Action- Alternative 2 Alternative 2 is the Proposed Action Alternative designed to specifically meet the purpose and need for this project. Information gathered from early scoping was considered by the Forest 4
5 Service and narrowed down to a proposal that would meet sustainable trail uses and recreation needs in the project area. Under this alternative, the Forest Service would: Construct and/or designate approximately 42.2 miles (mi) of sustainable trail and associated facilities in the Buffalo Pass area (Figure 1). This includes 38.5 mi of new nonmotorized single-track trail, and 3.7 mi of motorized single-track trail. Some existing user-created trails would be incorporated/designated as part of the trail system. Rerouting, decommissioning, and rehabilitation of user-created trails, or portions thereof, would occur for resource protection. The Dry Lake parking facilities would be improved for visitor use. To address further non-system trail development, a closure order would be implemented prohibiting mountain bike and all other wheeled-vehicle use off of designated roads and trails. Project implementation would likely begin in spring or summer of Under this alternative, approximately 17.9 mi of non-motorized single-track trail would be developed in Colorado Roadless Areas. This includes 13.1 mi in the Mad Creek CRA, and 4.8 mi in the Long Park CRA (Figure 1). The Forest Service completed a pre-scoping roadless project evaluation and found the proposed action to be consistent with the Colorado Roadless Rule. The rule does not prohibit motorized or non-motorized trail construction in Colorado roadless areas. Tree cutting or trimming (approximately 11.5 ac) would be incidental to construction and future maintenance of proposed trails, activities otherwise not prohibited under the rule. Alternatives to the Proposed Action Alternatives to the proposed action include the No Action Alternative (Alternative 1) and Trail/ Area Closure (Alternative 3). No Action- Alternative 1 The analysis may document consideration of a no-action alternative through the effects analysis by contrasting the impacts of the proposed action and any alternative(s) with the current condition and expected future condition if the proposed action were not implemented (36 CFR 220.7(b)(2(ii). Alternative 1 is the No Action Alternative. Under this alternative, the Buffalo Pass Trails Project would not be implemented, and current management would continue in the project area. No new trails or facilities would be developed to provide for recreation needs. Resource impacts and conflicts from illegal trail activities would not be addressed. An off-route closure order for mountain bikes and wheeled vehicles would not be implemented and resource impacts would continue. Under the No Action Alternative, valid previously 5
6 approved management actions would continue to be implemented in the project area, and new independent actions could be analyzed and/or implemented. Trail/ Area Closure- Alternative 3 Existing user-created and non-system trails (approximately 14 miles) in the project area including portions in roadless areas would be closed and rehabilitated, and no new trails would be designated. A closure order would be implemented prohibiting mountain bike and all other wheeled-vehicle use off of designated roads and trails. Implementation would likely begin in spring or summer of Decision to be Made The Hahns Peak/Bears Ears District Ranger is the responsible official for this decision. The responsible official will review the environmental analysis for the proposed action, other alternatives, and any public comments to determine whether to implement, in part or full, the proposed action, alternatives, and design criteria and mitigation. Public Involvement Early scoping that occurred for this project is summarized above (Background). This is the first opportunity for the public to provide formal comments on the Buffalo Pass Trails Project. The project was first listed in the Forest Service Schedule of Proposed Actions ( on April 1, 2015, and updates are provided quarterly. Issues to Consider Issues are unresolved conflicts that arise as a result of the proposed action. The analysis will be issue-driven and contain detail commensurate to the degree at which a resource may be affected. From internal scoping, the Forest Service has identified preliminary issues and initial design criteria related to: Roadless Areas o Under the proposed action (Alternative 2), approximately 17.9 mi of nonmotorized single-track trail would be developed in Colorado Roadless Areas. This includes 13.1 mi in the Mad Creek CRA and 4.8 mi in the Long Park CRA (Figure 1). o The Forest Service completed a pre-scoping roadless project evaluation and found the proposed action to be consistent with the Colorado Roadless Rule. The rule does not prohibit motorized or non-motorized trail construction in Colorado roadless areas. Tree cutting or trimming (approximately 11.5 ac) would be incidental to construction and future maintenance of proposed trails, activities otherwise not prohibited under the rule. 6
7 Wildlife o Threatened, endangered, and sensitive species o Big game habitat and animal distribution o Wildlife-human conflicts o Biodiversity of the Soda Creek Preliminary Conservation Planning Area o Wildlife critical life stages and seasonal habitat needs o Raptor nests and breeding periods Hydrology o Soil erosion and sediment o Water quality o Streams o Wetlands including fens and springs Visual and scenic quality Sensitive and local concern plant species Revegetation methods Invasive non-native plants Other issues raised through internal scoping, field analysis, or in response to this notice of proposed action will be considered and addressed in the environmental analysis. Some issues may be addressed through modification of the proposed action, development of a new alternative, or mitigation measures. Comment Process The proposed project is an activity implementing a land management plan and subject to the objection process described in 36 CFR 218 Subparts A and B. The Forest Service is combining scoping with the legal notice and opportunity to comment, consistent with The public is encouraged to provide specific written comments on this proposal, including supporting reasons for the responsible official to consider. Specific written comments are within the scope of and have a direct relationship to the proposed action. Written comments will be accepted for 30 calendar days following the publication of a legal notice in the Steamboat Pilot & Today. The publication date in the newspaper of record is the exclusive means for calculating the comment period. The regulations prohibit extending the length of the comment period. However, the Forest Service has the option of providing additional comment periods if determined necessary. Written comments must be submitted via mail, fax, electronically, or in person (Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding holidays) to: Charles Sharp, NEPA Planner, USDA Forest Service, 100 Main Street, PO Box 158, Walden, CO Electronic comments including attachments can be submitted to: comments-rm-medicine-bow-routt-hahns-peakbears-ears@fs.fed.us. Acceptable formats for electronic comments include rich text (rtf), Word (doc or docx), and pdf. 7
8 It is the responsibility of persons providing comments to submit them by the close of the comment period. Only those who submit timely and specific written comments will have eligibility to file an objection under For objection eligibility, each individual or representative from each entity submitting timely and specific written comments must either sign the comment or verify identity upon request. Individuals and organizations wishing to be eligible to object must meet the information requirements in (a)(3). Names and contact information submitted with comments will become part of the public record and may be released under the Freedom of Information Act. If the agency determines there are no significant impacts, that finding along with the EA and a draft decision notice will be published for a 45-day objection period. If no specific written comments are received during the designated opportunity for comment, the project will not be subject to objection. If the EA concludes there is potential for significant impacts, then an environmental impact statement will need to be prepared. This also is requesting your comments under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended (NHPA). Consultation under the NHPA seeks to consider the views about an undertaking and its effects on historic properties for the agency official to consider in decision making (36 CFR 800). Additional information regarding this proposal can be obtained from: Project Leader Kent Foster, USDA Forest Service, 925 Weiss Drive, Steamboat Springs, CO 80487, (970) , kfoster@fs.fed.us. Disclaimer: The Forest Service uses the most current and complete data it has available. GIS data and product accuracy may vary. They may be: developed from sources of differing accuracy, accurate only at certain scales, based on modeling or interpretation, incomplete while being created or revised, have represented features not in accurate geographic locations, etc. The Forest Service makes no expressed or implied warranty, including warranty of merchantability and fitness, with respect to the character, function, or capabilities of the data or their appropriateness for any user's purposes. The Forest Service reserves the right to correct, update, modify, or replace this geospatial information based on new inventories, new or revised information, and if necessary in conjunction with other federal, state or local public agencies or the public in general as required by policy or regulation. Previous recipients of the products may not be notified unless required by policy or regulation. For more information, contact the Medicine Bow-Routt National Forests and Thunder Basin National Grassland Supervisor's Office (2468 Jackson Street, Laramie, WY 82070, ). The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC or call (202) (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. 8
Decision Memo for Desolation Trail: Mill D to Desolation Lake Trail Relocation
for Salt Lake County, Utah Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest Salt Lake Ranger District 1. Background The present location of the Desolation Trail (#1159) between Mill D and Desolation Lake follows old
More informationBACKGROUND DECISION. Decision Memo Page 1 of 6
DECISION MEMO DEVIL S ELBOW BY-PASS, BOUNDARY TRAIL NO.1 U.S. FOREST SERVICE T9N, R7E, SECTION 9 RANGE 5E COWLITZ COUNTY WA MOUNT ST. HELENS NATIONAL VOLCANIC MONUMENT, GIFFORD PINCHOT NATIONAL FOREST
More informationProposed Action. Payette National Forest Over-Snow Grooming in Valley, Adams and Idaho Counties. United States Department of Agriculture
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service January 2012 Proposed Action Payette National Forest Over-Snow Grooming in Valley, Adams and Idaho Counties Payette National Forest Valley, Adams
More informationWhite Mountain National Forest
White Mountain National Forest United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Eastern Region Boles Brook Snowmobile Bridge Decision Memo Boles Brook Snowmobile Bridge Project Town of Woodstock
More informationDecision Memo Ice Age Trail Improvement (CRAC 37)
Decision Memo Ice Age Trail Improvement (CRAC 37) U.S. Forest Service Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest, Medford-Park Falls Ranger District Taylor County, Wisconsin T32N, R2W, Town of Grover, Section
More informationWhite Mountain National Forest Saco Ranger District
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service White Mountain National Forest 33 Kancamagus Highway Conway, NH 03818 Comm: (603) 447-5448 TTY: (603) 447-3121 File Code: 1950 Date: February 26,
More informationBuford / New Castle Motorized Trail
Buford / New Castle Motorized Trail Rifle Ranger District, White River National Forest Garfield County, Colorado Comments Welcome The Rifle Ranger District of the White River National Forest welcomes your
More informationTracy Ridge Shared Use Trails and Plan Amendment Project
Tracy Ridge Shared Use Trails and Plan Amendment Project Scoping Document Forest Service Allegheny National Forest Bradford Ranger District McKean, County, Pennsylvania In accordance with Federal civil
More informationWhite Mountain National Forest. Pond of Safety Accessible Trail & Shoreline Access Project. Scoping Report. Township of Randolph Coos County, NH
White Mountain National Forest United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Eastern Region Pond of Safety Accessible Trail & Shoreline Access Project Township of Randolph Coos County, NH Scoping
More informationSawtooth National Forest Fairfield Ranger District
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Sawtooth National Forest Fairfield Ranger District P.O. Box 189 Fairfield, ID. 83327 208-764-3202 Fax: 208-764-3211 File Code: 1950/7700 Date: December
More informationWhite Mountain National Forest. Rumney Rocks Project Supplemental Environmental Assessment. 30-day Comment Report
White Mountain National Forest United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Rumney Rocks Project Supplemental Environmental Assessment Eastern Region Town of Rumney, Grafton County, NH 30-day
More informationDecision Memo Sun Valley Super Enduro & Cross-Country Mountain Bike Race. Recreation Event
Decision Memo 2015 Sun Valley Super Enduro & Cross-Country Mountain Bike Race Recreation Event USDA Forest Service Ketchum Ranger District, Sawtooth National Forest Blaine County, Idaho Background The
More informationDecision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact
Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact Steamboat Ski Area Summer Trails Project USDA Forest Service Medicine Bow-Routt National Forests Hahns Peak/Bears Ears Ranger District Routt County,
More informationDecision Memo Broken Wheel Ranch Equestrian Outfitter Special-Use Permit Proposed Action
Decision Memo Broken Wheel Ranch Equestrian Outfitter Special-Use Permit USDA Forest Service Mississippi Bluffs Ranger District, Shawnee National Forest Jackson and Union Counties, Illinois Proposed Action
More informationDaisy Dean Trail 628/619 ATV Trail Construction
Background and Purpose and Need The Daisy Dean ATV Trail Construction Project is located in the Little Belt Mountains, Musselshell Ranger District, Lewis and Clark National Forest approximately 32 miles
More informationOttawa National Forest Supervisor s Office
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Supervisor s Office E6248 US2 Ironwood, MI 49938 (906) 932-1330 (906) 932-0122 (FAX) File Code: 1950/2350 Date: April 11, 2012 Dear Friends of the,
More informationDECISION MEMO. Rawhide Trail #7073 Maintenance and Reconstruction
Page 1 of 6 Background DECISION MEMO USDA Forest Service Jefferson Ranger District Jefferson County, Montana Rawhide Trail #7073 is located in the Elkhorn Mountain Range approximately 10 miles east of
More informationMemo. Board of County Commissioners. FROM: Tamra Allen, Planner. Buford/New Castle Motorized Trail. Date: February 13, 2012
Memo TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Tamra Allen, Planner RE: Buford/New Castle Motorized Trail Date: February 13, 2012 Overview The White River National Forest Rifle District Office ( RDO ) issued
More informationPROPOSED ACTION South 3000 East Salt Lake City, UT United States Department of Agriculture
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest Salt Lake Ranger District 6944 South 3000 East Salt Lake City, UT 84121 801-733-2660 File Code: 1950/2300 Date:
More informationDECISION MEMO For Bullis Hollow Trail
I. DECISION TO BE IMPLEMENTED A. Description of Decision DECISION MEMO For Bullis Hollow Trail USDA Forest Service, Eastern Region 9 Allegheny National Forest Bradford Ranger District Corydon Township
More informationDECISION MEMO North Zone (Legacy Trails) Trail Stabilization Project
DECISION MEMO North Zone (Legacy Trails) Trail Stabilization Project USDA FOREST SERVICE Rocky Mountain Region (R2) Shoshone National Forest Wapiti and Greybull Ranger District Park County, Wyoming Background
More informationDecision Memo for Philmont Scout Ranch Bike Trail and Access Reroute Project
Decision Memo Philmont Scout Ranch Bike Trail and Access Reroute Project USDA Forest Service, Southwestern Region Questa Ranger District, Carson National Forest Colfax County, New Mexico (T. 30N, R. 17E,
More informationBradley Brook Relocation Project. Scoping Notice. Saco Ranger District. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service
Bradley Brook Relocation Project United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Scoping Notice White Mountain National Forest February 2011 For Information Contact: Jenny Burnett White Mountain
More informationGREENWOOD VEGETATION MANAGEMENT
APPENDIX G GREENWOOD VEGETATION MANAGEMENT PROJECT RECREATION RESOURCE REPORT Prepared by: Laurie A. Smith Supervisory Forester Stearns Ranger District Daniel Boone National Forest August 4, 2016 The
More informationHiawatha National Forest St. Ignace Ranger District. File Code: 1950 Date: August 5, 2011
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Hiawatha National Forest St. Ignace Ranger District W1900 West US-2 St. Ignace, MI 49781 906-643-7900 File Code: 1950 Date: August 5, 2011 Dear National
More informationDECISION MEMO Whetstone Ridge Trail #8020 Relocation
Page 1 of 7 Background DECISION MEMO Whetstone Ridge Trail #8020 Relocation USDA Forest Service Pintler Ranger District Granite County T4N, R16W, Sections 4,9,29 and T4N, R17W, Section 36 Whetstone Ridge
More informationDECISION MEMO Grand Targhee Resort Summer Trails. USDA Forest Service Caribou-Targhee National Forest Idaho Falls, Idaho 83401
DECISION MEMO Grand Targhee Resort Summer Trails USDA Forest Service Caribou-Targhee National Forest Idaho Falls, Idaho 83401 Background Situated on the east side of the Teton Mountain Range, Grand Targhee
More informationRIM TRAIL EXTENSION PROJECT
DECISION MEMO For RAINBOW RIM TRAIL EXTENSION PROJECT Located on National Forest System Lands USDA Forest Service, Southwest Region Kaibab National Forest - North Kaibab Ranger District T.35 N, R.1 E,
More informationKelly Motorized Trails Project Proposed Action
Kelly Motorized Trails Project Proposed Action November 28, 2011 The Flagstaff Ranger District of the Coconino National Forest is seeking public input on the proposed Kelly Motorized Trails Project (formerly
More informationPole Mountain Travel Management Scoping Document
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Pole Mountain Travel Management Scoping Document Laramie Ranger District Medicine Bow-Routt National Forests and Thunder Basin National Grassland
More informationCoronado National Forest Santa Catalina Ranger District
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Coronado National Forest Santa Catalina Ranger District File Code: 1950 Date: October 14, 2015 Dear Interested Party: The Santa Catalina Ranger District
More informationWhite Mountain National Forest Saco Ranger District
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service White Mountain National Forest Saco Ranger District 33 Kancamagus Highway Conway, NH 03818 Comm: (603) 447-5448 TTY: (603) 447-3121 File Code: 1950
More informationNational Forests and Grasslands in Texas
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service National Forests and Grasslands in Texas Sam Houston NF 394 FM 1375 West New Waverly, Texas 77358 Phone 936-344-6205 Dear Friends, File Code: 1950
More information1803 West Hwy 160 Monte Vista, CO (719) TTY (719)
USDA Forest Service Rio Grande National Forest http://www.fs.fed.us/r2/riogrande 1803 West Hwy 160 Monte Vista, CO 81144 (719)852-5941 TTY (719)852-6271 USDI Bureau of Land Management San Luis Valley Center
More informationDavid Johnson. Tom, Attached please find the final scoping letter and figures for your review. David
David Johnson From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments: David Johnson Tuesday, April 12, 2011 4:33 PM Thomas Malecek Dave Dyer; Jason Marks (jmarks@segroup.com) VWC Scoping Letter
More informationWhite Mountain National Forest
White Mountain National Forest United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Eastern Region Batchelder Brook and Guinea Pond Snowmobile Bridges Decision Memo Batchelder Brook/Guinea Pond Snowmobile
More informationDraft Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact
United States Department of Agriculture Draft Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact Zuni Mountain Trail Project Cibola National Forest, Mt Taylor Ranger District McKinley County & Cibola
More informationDescription of the Proposed Action for the Big Creek / Yellow Pine Travel Plan (Snow-free Season) and Big Creek Ford Project
Description of the Proposed Action for the Big Creek / Yellow Pine Travel Plan (Snow-free Season) and Big Creek Ford Project Payette National Forest Krassel Ranger District Valley and Idaho Counties, Idaho
More informationCrystal Lake Area Trails
Lake Area Trails Welcome to the Lake area of the Big Snowy Mountains! This island mountain range in central Montana features peaks reaching to 8,600 feet and long, high ridges from which vistas of the
More informationAlternative 3 Prohibit Road Construction, Reconstruction, and Timber Harvest Except for Stewardship Purposes B Within Inventoried Roadless Areas
Roadless Area Conservation FEIS Summary Table S-1. Comparison of Key Characteristics and Effects by Prohibition Alternative. The effects summarized in this table A would occur in inventoried roadless areas
More informationFINAL TESTIMONY 1 COMMITTEE ON RESOURCES UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES. July 13, 2005 CONCERNING. Motorized Recreational Use of Federal Lands
FINAL TESTIMONY 1 STATEMENT OF DALE BOSWORTH CHIEF Of the FOREST SERVICE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Before the SUBCOMMITTEE ON FORESTS AND FOREST HEALTH And the SUBCOMMITTEE ON NATIONAL PARKS,
More informationMt. Hood National Forest
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Mt. Hood National Forest Zigzag Ranger District 70220 E. Highway 26 Zigzag, OR 97049 503-622-3191 Fax: 503-622-5622 File Code: 1950-1 Date: June 29,
More informationRule Governing the Designation and Establishment of All-Terrain Vehicle Use Trails on State Land
Rule Governing the Designation and Establishment of All-Terrain Vehicle Use Trails on State Land 1.0 Authority 1.1 This rule is promulgated pursuant to 23 V.S.A. 3506. Section 3506 (b)(4) states that an
More informationTahoe National Forest Over-Snow Vehicle Use Designation
Tahoe National Forest Over-Snow Vehicle Use Designation USDA Forest Service Tahoe National Forest February 20, 2015 Introduction The Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture will prepare an Environmental
More informationLakes Landscape Travel Management
Decision Notice & Finding of No Significant Impact Lakes Landscape Travel Management USDA Forest Service Columbine Ranger District, San Juan National Forest Archuleta, Hinsdale, and La Plata Counties,
More informationDraft Record of Decision
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service September 2014 Draft Record of Decision Oregon Dunes NRA Management Area 10 (C) Designated Routes Project Central Coast Ranger District-Oregon Dunes
More informationWilliamson Rock/Pacific Crest National Scenic Trail (PCT) Project EIS. Notice of intent to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement.
[3411-15-P] DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Forest Service Angeles National Forest; Los Angeles County, CA Williamson Rock/Pacific Crest National Scenic Trail (PCT) Project EIS AGENCY: ACTION: Forest Service,
More informationWhite Mountain National Forest. Campton Day Use Area Development Project. Scoping Report. Prepared by the Pemigewasset Ranger District May 2013
White Mountain National Forest Campton Day Use Area Development Project United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Eastern Region Towns of Thornton and Campton, Grafton County, NH Scoping Report
More informationCascade River State Park Management Plan Amendment
This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp Cascade River State
More informationDraft Environmental Impact Statement
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Pacific Southwest Region Draft Environmental Impact Statement Inyo National Forest Motorized Travel Management R5-MB-182 January 2009 Inyo Mountains
More informationFrancis Marion and Sumter National Forests
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Francis Marion and Sumter National Forests 2967 Steed Creek Rd. Huger, SC 29450 Tele: (843)336-2200 File Code: 1950 Date: February 13, 2015 To Whom
More informationChetco River Kayaking Permit
Decision Memo USDA Forest Service Rogue River-Siskiyou National Forest Gold Beach Ranger District - Curry County, Oregon Wild Rivers Ranger District Josephine County, Oregon BACKGROUND A special use permit
More informationPreferred Recreation Recommendations Stemilt-Squilchuck Recreation Plan March 2018
Preferred Recreation Recommendations Stemilt-Squilchuck Recreation Plan March 2018 Below are the recommended recreation ideas and strategies that package together the various recreation concepts compiled
More informationFremont Point Cabin Reconstruction and Expansion Project Project Proposal & Public Scoping Documentation
Fremont Point Cabin Reconstruction and Expansion Project Fremont-Winema National Forests Silver Lake Ranger District The Silver Lake Ranger District of the Fremont-Winema National Forests is proposing
More informationRochester Ranger District Wellness Trails Project
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Eastern Region September 2015 Rochester Ranger District Wellness Trails Project Decision Memo Green Mountain National Forest Rochester Ranger District
More informationSpecial Recreation Management Areas Extensive Recreation Management Areas Public Lands Not Designated as Recreation Management Areas
From the Proposed RMP: Special Recreation Management Areas SRMAs are an administrative unit where the existing or proposed recreation opportunities and recreation setting characteristics are recognized
More informationLogo Department Name Agency Organization Organization Address Information 5700 North Sabino Canyon Road
Logo Department Name Agency Organization Organization Address Information United States Forest Coronado National Forest 5700 North Sabino Canyon Road Department of Service Santa Catalina Ranger District
More informationThank you for this second opportunity to comment on the proposed revisions to the Coconino National Forest Management plan.
March 8, 2011 Flagstaff Biking Organization PO Box 23851 Flagstaff, AZ 86002 Yewah Lau Coconino National Forest Attn: Plan Revision 1824 South Thompson Street Flagstaff, Arizona 86001 Sent via electronic
More informationContinental Divide National Scenic Trail Legislative History and Planning Guidance
Continental Divide National Scenic Trail Legislative History and Planning Guidance Legislation, Policy, and Direction Regarding National Scenic Trails The National Trails System Act, P.L. 90-543, was passed
More informationWilderness Process #NP-1810: Your letter ID is NP September 5, 2018
Wilderness Process #NP-1810: Your letter ID is NP-1810-2602-96 September 5, 2018 RE: GMUG Wilderness Evaluation Revised Evaluation Criteria and Draft Report Forest Revision Planning Team: The Continental
More informationThank you for this third opportunity to comment on the proposed revisions to the Coconino National Forest Management plan.
March 19, 2014 Flagstaff Biking Organization PO Box 23851 Flagstaff, AZ 86002 Vern Keller Coconino National Forest Attn: Plan Revision 1824 South Thompson Street Flagstaff, Arizona 86001 coconino_national_forest_plan_revision_team@fs.fed.us
More informationCreating a User-Driven Long-Distance OHV Trail Through Partnering
Joseph Raffaele Outdoor Recreation Planner U.S. Bureau of Land Management Yuma, Arizona Creating a User-Driven Long-Distance OHV Trail Through Partnering BLM is a multiple-use land management agency within
More informationUSDA FOREST SERVICE, HIAWATHA NATIONAL FOREST Alger County, Michigan. Grand Island Primitive Cabins Project
USDA FOREST SERVICE, HIAWATHA NATIONAL FOREST Alger County, Michigan I. INTRODUCTION Grand Island Primitive Cabins Project DECISION NOTICE and FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT This document describes my
More informationTONGASS NATIONAL FOREST
TONGASS NATIONAL FOREST UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE-FOREST SERVICE Contact: Dennis Neill Phone: 907-228-6201 Release Date: May 17, 2002 SEIS Questions and Answers Q. Why did you prepare this
More informationAPPENDIX I STANDARD CONSULTATION PROTOCOL FOR TRAVEL MANAGEMENT ROUTE DESIGNATION
APPENDIX I STANDARD CONSULTATION PROTOCOL FOR TRAVEL MANAGEMENT ROUTE DESIGNATION Developed Pursuant to Stipulation IV.A. of the Region 3 First Amended Programmatic Agreement Regarding Historic Property
More informationUinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest Salt Lake Ranger District
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest Salt Lake Ranger District 6944 South 3000 East Salt Lake City, UT 84121 801-733-2660 File Code: 1950/2300 Date:
More informationPURPOSE AND NEED. Introduction
Public Scoping: Allocation of Recreation Capacity for Commercial Outfitter Guide Services on North Kruzof Island Trails (Kruzof Island Outfitter Guide) PURPOSE AND NEED Introduction The U.S. Department
More informationRUSHMORE CONNECTOR TRAIL PROPOSAL
PURPOSE AND NEED Background The U.S. Forest Service, Black Hills National Forest (Forest Service) has received a special use permit application from the State of South Dakota Department of Game, Fish and
More informationApril 10, Mark Stiles San Juan Public Lands Center Manager 15 Burnett Court Durango, CO Dear Mark,
Mark Stiles San Juan Public Lands Center Manager 15 Burnett Court Durango, CO 81301 Dear Mark, We are pleased to offer the following comments on the draft San Juan Public Lands Center management plans
More informationEagle Rock Loop Ouachita National Forest Page 1 of 8
EAGLE ROCK LOOP Eagle Rock Loop Ouachita National Forest Page 1 of 8 Hiking: Biking: Equestrian: Trail Highlights: This trail offers the longest loop trail in Arkansas. A combination of the Little Missouri,
More informationDecision Notice & Finding of No Significant Impact Middle Citico Equestrian Trail Network
Decision Notice & Finding of No Significant Impact Middle Citico Equestrian Trail Network USDA Forest Service Tellico Ranger District, Cherokee National Forest Monroe County, Tennessee Decision and Reasons
More informationLassen National Forest Over-snow Vehicle Use Designation
United States Department of Agriculture Over-snow Vehicle Use Designation Revised Draft Environmental Impact Statement Volume II. Appendices Forest Service September 2017 Cover photo: Jonohey In accordance
More informationEnvironmental Assessment
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service August 2013 Environmental Assessment Fallen Leaf Lake Trail Access and Travel Management Project Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit, Region 5 USDA Forest
More informationFinal Environmental Impact Statement for the Merced Wild and Scenic River. Comprehensive Management Plan, Yosemite National Park, Madera and Mariposa
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 02/26/2014 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2014-04061, and on FDsys.gov DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 4312-FF NATIONAL
More informationTeton Basin Ranger District
Teton Basin Ranger District P.O. Box 777 Driggs, ID 83422 File Code: 1950/2350 Date: August 5, 2002 Greetings: You received the preliminary Environmental Assessment (EA) for the Teton Pass Trail last summer.
More informationFossil Creek Wild & Scenic River Comprehensive River Management Plan Forest Service Proposed Action - details March 28, 2011
Fossil Creek Wild & Scenic River Comprehensive River Management Plan Forest Service Proposed Action - details March 28, 2011 Primary Goals of the Proposed Action 1. Maintain or enhance ORVs primarily by
More informationWhite Mountain National Forest Androscoggin and Evans Notch Ranger Districts
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service White Mountain National Forest Androscoggin and Evans Notch Ranger Districts 300 Glen Road Gorham, NH 03581-1399 Comm: (603) 466-2713 TTD: (603) 466-2856
More informationUnited States Department of Agriculture. Forest Service
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service DECISION NOTICE AND FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT MT. HOUGH SOUTH PARK PROPOSED TRAILS SYSTEM PROJECT U.S. FOREST SERVICE, PLUMAS NATIONAL FOREST,
More informationProcedure for the Use of Power-Driven Mobility Devices on Mass Audubon Sanctuaries 1 September 17, 2012
Procedure for the Use of Power-Driven Mobility Devices on Mass Audubon Sanctuaries 1 September 17, 2012 Background As part of Mass Audubon s mission to preserve the nature of Massachusetts for people and
More informationDESIGN FEATURES ASSOCIATED WITH THE SELECTED ALTERNATIVE
-:::-= D DECISION NOTICE /FINDING OF No SIGNIFICANT IMPACT BRUNDAGE MOUNTAIN CAT-SKI OUTFITTER AND GUIDE PERMIT BOUNDARY EXPANSION U.S. FOREST SERVICE PAYETTE NATIONAL FOREST NEW MEADOWS RANGER DISTRICT
More informationWilderness Specialist s Report
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service July 2009 Wilderness Specialist s Report Travel Management Rule EIS USDA Forest Service Southwestern Region Apache-Sitgreaves National Forests Prepared
More informationSt. Joe Travel Management EA CULTURAL RESOURCES
St. Joe Travel Management EA CULTURAL RESOURCES Bruce Gibson May 2015 Regulatory Framework Forest Plan The Idaho Panhandle National Forests (IPNF) Forest Plan requires systematic cultural resource inventory
More informationArizona Game and Fish Department Report for Inventory of Motorized Dispersed Campsites on the Tonto National Forest
Arizona Game and Fish Department Report for Inventory of Motorized Dispersed Campsites on the Tonto National Forest Prepared By: ' _2-_.J_.., +-- / S IS Specialist II, Arizona Game and Fish Dep rtment
More informationChattahoochee- Oconee National Forests. Decision Memo
Page 1 of 6 USDA Forest Service Chattahoochee- Oconee National Forests Decision Memo Chattahoochee-Oconee National Forests Home Page Recreation Information Forest History Forest Facts Forest Management
More informationPlanning Grazing. Pasture Planning. Fencing for Grazing Systems. High Tensile. High Tensile. High Tensile 3/31/2014. water, and paddocks
Planning Grazing Systemsfencing, water, and paddocks Dan Ludwig NRCS Grazing Specialist- SE PA Natural Resources Conservation Service Berks County Grazing School Fencing Perimeter Paddock Alleyway Water
More informationRecreation Opportunity Spectrum for River Management v
Recreation Opportunity Spectrum for Management v. 120803 Introduction The following Recreation Opportunity Spectrum (ROS) characterizations and matrices mirror the presentation in the ROS Primer and Field
More informationOffice of Commercial Space Transportation: Notice of Availability, Notice of Public
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 04/20/2018 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2018-08345, and on FDsys.gov [4910-13] DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
More informationFS-14 Parachute. Packing Instructions. United States Department of Agriculture. Forest Service. Technology & Development Program
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Technology & Development Program 5700 Aviation June 1998 9857-2817-MTDC Revised June 1998 Packing Instructions FS-14 Parachute Pat Wilson Project
More informationLolo National Forest Plan Amendment #38
Lolo National Forest Plan Amendment #38 Welcome Creek Wilderness Opportunity Classes and Standards USDA Forest Service, Lolo National Forest Missoula Ranger District Granite County, Montana July 2012 I.
More informationNational Park Service Wilderness Action Plan
National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Wilderness Action Plan National Wilderness Steering Committee National Park Service "The mountains can be reached in all seasons.
More informationChetco River Kayaking Permit
Preliminary Decision Memo USDA Forest Service Rogue River-Siskiyou National Forest Gold Beach Ranger District - Curry County, Oregon BACKGROUND A special use permit has been requested by Zachary Collier,
More informationMETROPOLITAN COUNCIL 390 North Robert Street, St. Paul, MN Phone (651) TDD (651)
DATE: March 27, 2012 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 390 North Robert Street, St. Paul, MN 55101 Phone (651) 602-1000 TDD (651) 291-0904 TO: Metropolitan Parks and Open Space Commission FROM: Arne Stefferud, Planning
More informationNational Wilderness Steering Committee
National Wilderness Steering Committee Guidance White Paper Number 1 Issue: Cultural Resources and Wilderness Date: November 30, 2002 Introduction to the Issue Two of the purposes of the National Wilderness
More informationDECISION MEMO. for Single-Track Mountain Bike Trail Snowbird Ski and Summer Resort
DECISION MEMO for Single-Track Mountain Bike Trail Snowbird Ski and Summer Resort Salt Lake County, Utah Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest Salt Lake Ranger District DECISION AND RATIONALE I have reviewed
More informationGATEWAY PHASE 2. U.S. Forest Service and the Mount Shasta Trails Association
GATEWAY PHASE 2 U.S. Forest Service and the Mount Shasta Trails Association PROJECT DEVELOPMENT Brief history - Gateway Phase 1 - IMBA conceptual plan - BikeShasta: concert series - USFS & MSTA partnered
More informationProposed Action Kaibab Campground Capital Improvement Project September 2008
Background Kaibab Campground Capital Improvement Project September 2008 The Williams Ranger District of the Kaibab National Forest is proposing to improve the Kaibab Lake Campground. Kaibab Lake Campground
More informationMONTEREY REGIONAL AIRPORT MASTER PLAN TOPICAL QUESTIONS FROM THE PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE AND TOPICAL RESPONSES
MONTEREY REGIONAL AIRPORT MASTER PLAN TOPICAL QUESTIONS FROM THE PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE AND TOPICAL RESPONSES Recurring topics emerged in some of the comments and questions raised by members of the
More informationConnie Rudd Superintendent, Black Canyon of the Gunnison National Park
National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Black Canyon of the Gunnison National Park and Curecanti National Recreation Area Information Brochure #1 Wilderness and Backcountry Management Plan
More informationPLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT May 10, Members of the Planning Commission. Joyce Parker-Bozylinski, Contract Planner
PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT May 10, 2007 TO: FROM: PROPOSAL: APPLICANT: RECOMMENDATION: Members of the Planning Commission Joyce Parker-Bozylinski, Contract Planner Approval of the Calabasas Trails
More informationWilderness Character and Wilderness Characteristics. What s the difference? Why does it matter?
Introduction Wilderness Character and Wilderness Characteristics What s the difference? Why does it matter? The terms wilderness character and wilderness characteristics are sometimes used interchangeably
More information