Annual Range Complex Exercise Report. 2 August 2009 to 1 August 2010

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Annual Range Complex Exercise Report. 2 August 2009 to 1 August 2010"

Transcription

1 Prepared for and submitted to: Prepared by: National Marine Fisheries ervice Office of Protected Resources Department of the Navy In accordance with the Letter of Authorization under the MMPA and IT authorization under the EA Annual Range Complex Exercise Report 2 August 2009 to 1 August For The U.. Navy s outhern California (OCAL) Range Complex and Hawaii Range Complex (HRC) 1 October

2 Commander, U.. Pacific Fleet OCAL and HRC Annual Range Exercise Report 01 October TABLE OF CONTENT OUTHERN CALIFORNIA RANGE COMPLEX INTRODUCTION... 2 (1) OCAL MFA/HFA Major Training Exercises (i) Exercise information... 4 (ii) Individual marine mammal sighting information by exercise... 5 (iii) Evaluation (based on data gathered during all MTEs) of effectiveness (2) OCAL AW ummary (i) Total annual hours of each type of sonar source (ii) Cumulative Impact Report (3) OCAL INKEX (4) OCAL IEER ummary (5) OCAL Explosives ummary HAWA RANGE COMPLEX INTRODUCTION (1) HRC MFA/HFA Major Training Exercises (i) Exercise information (ii) Individual marine mammal sighting information by exercise (iii) Evaluation (based on data gathered during all MTEs) of effectiveness (2) HRC AW ummary (i) Total annual hours of each type of sonar source (ii) Total sonar hours (dense humpback areas) (iii) Total sonar hours (humpback whale cautionary area) (iv) Cumulative Impact Report (3) HRC INKEX (4) HRC IEER/AEER ummary (5) HRC Explosives ummary

3 Commander, U.. Pacific Fleet OCAL and HRC Annual Range Exercise Report 01 October OUTHERN CALIFORNIA RANGE COMPLEX INTRODUCTION The U.. Navy prepared this Annual Range Complex Exercise Report covering the period from 2 August 2009 to 1 August in compliance with the National Marine Fisheries ervice (NMF) Final Rule under the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA) for the outhern California Range Complex (OCAL) and the Hawaii Range Complex (HRC) (NMF 2009). In the OCAL Range Complex Letter of Authorization Requirements for monitoring and reporting, the following report subsections were specified and are present within this report for the OCAL Range Complex: (1) Mid-Frequency Active onar (MFA)/High-Frequency Active onar (HFA) Major Training Exercises (MTE). (i) (ii) (iii) Exercise information (for each MTE). Individual marine mammal sighting information (for each MTE). Evaluation (based on data gathered during all MTEs) of effectiveness of mitigation measures designed to avoid exposing marine mammals to MFA. This evaluation shall identify the specific observations that support any conclusion the Navy reaches about the effectiveness of the mitigation. (2) Anti-submarine Warfare (AW) ummary (i) (ii) Total annual hours of each type of sonar source Cumulative Impact Report (3) inking Exercises (INKEX) (4) Improved Extended Echo Ranging (IEER) ummary (5) Explosives ummary (i) (ii) Total annual number of each type of explosive exercises Total annual expended/detonated rounds for each explosive type This Annual Report covers the period from 2 August 2009 to 1 August, and the information represents the best practical data collection for this period. Due to the data collection and reporting timeline differing from the actual LOA dates, exercise data from 2 August 2009 to 19 January falls under the 2009 OCAL Letter of Authorization, while exercise data from 20 January to 1 August falls under the OCAL Letter of Authorization. In an effort to provide a better representation of annual exercise data for the OCAL Range Complex, the Navy has combined all exercise data from 2 August 2009 to 1 August and compared it to the annual allocations provided in the OCAL Letter of Authorization. This representation of annual exercise data shall be repeated in future Annual Reports. To provide accounting for the entire five year period of the authorization, the Navy will also submit a final report at the end of the five years to provide comprehensive totals of authorized usage. Finally, on review of accumulated reporting metrics, the Navy has determined that certain portions become classified by their summary. Information designated as classified in this report will be submitted to NMF in a separate classified appendix to this report. 2

4 Commander, U.. Pacific Fleet OCAL and HRC Annual Range Exercise Report 01 October (1) OCAL MFA/HFA Major Training Exercises This section summarizes authorized sonar use and marine mammal observations from the MTEs conducted within the OCAL Range Complex between 2 August 2009 and 1 August. For OCAL, MTEs include hip Anti-ubmarine Warfare Readiness and Evaluation Measuring (HAREM), ustainment Exercises (UTEX), Integrated Anti ubmarine Warfare Course Phase (2), Composite Training Unit Exercises (COMPTUEX), and Joint Task Forces Exercises (JTFEX). There were a total of five MTEs within the OCAL Range Complex between 2 August 2009 and 1 August. Exercise specific details as described in the OCAL Final Rule (DoN 2009b) (f)(1)i-iii and LOA include: (i) Exercise Information (for each MTE) (ii) Individual Marine Mammal ighting Information (for each MTE) (iii) Evaluation (based on data gathered during all MTEs) of the effectiveness of mitigation measures designed to avoid exposing marine mammals to MFA. This evaluation shall identify the specific observations that support any conclusions the Navy reaches about the effectiveness of the mitigation. 3

5 Commander, U.. Pacific Fleet OCAL and HRC Annual Range Exercise Report 01 October (i) Exercise information Table 1-i-1. MTEs conducted in the OCAL Range Complex. (i) Exercise (ii) Date (iii) Locations (iv) # and types of active sources used (iv)a Q-53 (iv)b Q-56 (iv)c BQQ-5/10 (iv)d AQ-13F (iv)e AQ-22 (iv)f DICA (iv)g LQ-25 Nixie (v) # and types of passive sources used (v)a Q-53 (v)b Q-56 (v)c QR-19 (v)d BQQ-5/10 (iv)e AQ-22 (iv)d AQ-13F (v)e DIFAR onobuoys (vi) # and types of vessels and aircraft participating CG DDG FFG H-60F/R dipping helo H-60B non-dipping helo ubmarines P-3C MPRA Non-AW surface ships (vii) Total hours of observation by watchstanders (hrs) (viii) Total hours of all active sonar (ix) Total hours ea. active source UTEX NOV 2009 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 1 6,643 * * * * * * * * 11, 3, MAR * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 0 5,103 * * * * * * * * 13, 1, 6 17 MAR 2 APR * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 2 5,190 * * * * * * * * 6,1, MAY * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 6,1,4 ** 23 JUL 12 AUG * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 4 8,640 * * * * * * * * 6,1,3 UTEX=ustainment Exercise; =Integrated AW Course (Phase ); =Composite Training Exercise (ix)a Q-53 (ix)b Q-56 (ix)c BQQ-5/10 (ix)d AQ-13F (ix)e AQ-22 (ix)f DICA (ix)g LQ-25 Nixie (x) Wave height (high, low, and average) (ft) =OCAL Range Complex *Information is contained in the classified appendix to this report. ** ended 12 AUG. Data collected from 23 1 August is presented in this report. Data from 2 12 August will be included in the 2011 Annual Exercise Report. 4

6 Commander, U.. Pacific Fleet OCAL and HRC Annual Range Exercise Report 01 October (ii) Individual marine mammal sighting information by exercise Table 1-ii-1. OCAL MTE Individual Marine Mammal ighting Information: UTEX Nov (a) Location (b) pecies (c) # of individuals (d) Calves observed (y/n) (e) Initial detection sensor (f) Platform detection from (g) Length of time observed (min) (h) Wave height (ft) (i) Visibility (nm) (j) onar source in use (y/n) (k) Range (yds) (l) Mitigation implemented (m) If hullmounted source in use, true bearing and animal travel (n) Observed behavior OCAL whale 1 n VI non-aw ship na na OCAL pinniped 20 n VI DDG n na OCAL whale 5 n VI DDG n na OCAL whale 1 n VI DDG n na OCAL dolphin 1 n VI DDG 1 n na OCAL whale 1 n VI n >2000 na OCAL whale 1 n VI FFG n >2000 na OCAL whale 1 n VI non-aw ship na na OCAL dolphin 1 DDG 1 na OCAL dolphin 2 VI DDG n na OCAL whale 1 n VI DDG n na OCAL whale 1 n VI CG n <200 na OCAL dolphin 100 n VI Helo n >2000 na =not ; VI=visual; ACO=acoustic; y=yes; n=no; na=not applicable; crs=course 5

7 Commander, U.. Pacific Fleet OCAL and HRC Annual Range Exercise Report 01 October Table 1-ii-2. OCAL MTE Individual Marine Mammal ighting Information: 9-11 Mar. (a) Location (b) pecies (c) # of individuals (d) Calves observed (y/n) (e) Initial detection sensor (f) Platform detection from (g) Length of time observed (min) (h) Wave height (ft) (i) Visibility (nm) (j) onar source in use (y/n) (k) Range (yds) (l) Mitigation implemented (m) If hullmounted source in use, true bearing and animal travel (n) Observed behavior OCAL whale 2 n VI DDG n na blowing OCAL whale 3 n VI DDG n 2000 na blowing OCAL whale 2 n VI DDG n 200 na swimming OCAL whale 2 n VI DDG n na blowing OCAL whale 4 n VI DDG n na swimming OCAL whale 1 n VI DDG n ship maneuvered na OCAL whale 1 n VI DDG n na floating OCAL whale 1 n VI DDG n 1000 na blowing OCAL whale 2 n VI DDG n na blowing OCAL dolphin 5 n VI FFG n na OCAL dolphin 100 n VI FFG n na moving west to east OCAL dolphin 12 n VI CG n 2000 na OCAL whale 1 n VI CG n >2000 na 6

8 Commander, U.. Pacific Fleet OCAL and HRC Annual Range Exercise Report 01 October OCAL whale 6 n VI FFG n >2000 na OCAL dolphin 3 n VI DDG Y dB; ship maneuvered OCAL whale 1 n VI CG Y <200 secured sonar OCAL whale 2 n VI FFG Y >2000 OCAL dolphin 5 n VI DDG Y secured sonar; ship maneuvered OCAL whale 1 n VI CG Y <200 secured sonar OCAL DDG Y dB OCAL whale 1 n VI FFG Y >2000 dolphin 045 from ship, ship crs 239, dolphin opening ship whale 260 from ship, ship crs 319, whale opening ship whale 140 from ship, ship crs 312, whale opening ship dolphin 060 from ship, ship crs 263, dolphin opening ship whale 045 from ship, ship crs 266, whale direction animal bearing, ship crs 274, animal direction whale 030 from ship, ship crs 332, whale direction OCAL whale 1 n VI FFG n na OCAL whale 1 n VI DDG Y dB OCAL pinniped 8 n VI FFG Y <200 secured sonar whale 040 from ship, ship crs 235, whale opening ship pinniped 090 from ship, ship crs 076, pinniped closing ship tacking to open ship 7

9 Commander, U.. Pacific Fleet OCAL and HRC Annual Range Exercise Report 01 October OCAL dolphin 10 n VI FFG n na OCAL whale 6 n VI FFG n na OCAL dolphin 5 n VI CG Y secured sonar; ship maneuvered dolphin 330 from ship, ship crs 049, dolphin opening ship OCAL whale 1 n VI DDG n na blowing OCAL whale 16 n VI FFG n na OCAL dolphin 5 n VI FFG n na OCAL dolphin 5 n VI FFG n na OCAL dolphin 20 n VI DDG n <200 na swimming OCAL dolphin 6 n VI DDG n na swimming OCAL dolphin 10 n VI FFG n 2000 na =not ; VI=visual; ACO=acoustic; y=yes; n=no; na=not applicable; crs=course 8

10 Commander, U.. Pacific Fleet OCAL and HRC Annual Range Exercise Report 01 October Table 1-ii-3. OCAL MTE Individual Marine Mammal ighting Information: 17 Mar 2 Apr. (a) Location (b) pecies (c) # of individuals (d) Calves observed (y/n) (e) Initial detection sensor (f) Platform detection from (g) Length of time observed (min) (h) Wave height (ft) (i) Visibility (nm) (j) onar source in use (y/n) (k) Range (yds) (l) Mitigation implemented (m) If hullmounted source in use, true bearing and animal travel (n) Observed behavior OCAL whale 1 n VI non-aw ship 2 4 na na OCAL dolphin 20 n VI non-aw ship na OCAL dolphin 3 n VI non-aw ship na OCAL whale 1 n VI non-aw ship na na na na OCAL whale 1 n VI non-aw ship na >2000 na spouting and blowing OCAL dolphin 6 n VI DDG n na paralleling OCAL whale 1 n VI CG Y OCAL dolphin 8 n VI non-aw ship na dB whale 080 from ship, ship crs 093, whale paralleling ship paralleling, CPA at 800yds off port beam na OCAL whale 2 n VI non-aw ship na >2000 na closing and blowing 9

11 Commander, U.. Pacific Fleet OCAL and HRC Annual Range Exercise Report 01 October OCAL whale 1 n VI non-aw ship na na OCAL dolphin 5 n VI non-aw ship na na OCAL dolphin 20 n VI non-aw ship na <200 na OCAL whale 2 n VI non-aw ship na na OCAL dolphin 5 Y VI non-aw ship na <200 na OCAL dolphin 6 n VI non-aw ship 4 8 na na OCAL dolphin 8 n VI non-aw ship na <200 na OCAL dolphin 15 Y VI non-aw ship na na OCAL dolphin 8 n VI non-aw ship na na OCAL whale 1 VI non-aw ship na na OCAL dolphin 10 n VI non-aw ship na na OCAL dolphin 8 Y VI non-aw ship na na OCAL dolphin 30 n VI non-aw ship na <200 na OCAL whale 3 n VI non-aw ship na na OCAL dolphin 5 n VI non-aw ship na <200 na OCAL dolphin 30 n VI FFG Y >2000 secured sonar =not ; VI=visual; ACO=acoustic; y=yes; n=no; na=not applicable; crs=course dolphin 345 from ship, ship crs 015, dolphin opening ship 10

12 Commander, U.. Pacific Fleet OCAL and HRC Annual Range Exercise Report 01 October Table 1-ii-4. OCAL MTE Individual Marine Mammal ighting Information: May. (a) Location (b) pecies (c) # of individuals (d) Calves observed (y/n) (e) Initial detection sensor (f) Platform detection from (g) Length of time observed (min) (h) Wave height (ft) (i) Visibility (nm) (j) onar source in use (y/n) (k) Range (yds) (l) Mitigation implemented (m) If hullmounted source in use, true bearing and animal travel (n) Observed behavior OCAL dolphin 10 n VI DDG Y OCAL whale 1 n VI DDG 3 Y dB 6dB dolphin 070 from ship, ship crs 109, dolphin closing ship whale 290 from ship, ship crs 121, whale direction unk OCAL dolphin 10 n VI CG n na OCAL dolphin 10 n VI DDG Y secured sonar dolphin 320 from ship, ship crs 210, dolphin closing ship OCAL dolphin 20 n VI CG n na OCAL whale 1 n VI DDG Y >2000 whale 245 from ship, ship crs 276, whale paralleling ship 11

13 Commander, U.. Pacific Fleet OCAL and HRC Annual Range Exercise Report 01 October OCAL whale 2 n VI DDG n na OCAL dolphin 5 n VI DDG Y OCAL whale 1 n VI DDG 8 Y >2000 secured sonar 6dB dolphin 245 from ship, ship crs 269, dolphin closing ship whale 290 from ship, ship crs 279, whale closing ship OCAL whale 1 n VI CG n na OCAL whale 2 n VI DDG Y OCAL pinniped 1 n VI DDG Y secured sonar 6dB OCAL pinniped 1 n VI DDG Y <200 OCAL dolphin 2 n VI DDG Y OCAL dolphin 2 n VI DDG Y OCAL whale 1 n VI DDG n <200 secured sonar delayed MFA whale 300 from ship, ship crs 040, whale closing ship pinniped 110 from ship, ship crs 089, pinniped paralleling ship pinniped 050 from ship, ship crs 144, pinniped paralleling ship dolphin 050 from ship, ship crs 144, dolphin opening ship dolphin bearing, ship crs 145, dolphin direction na 12

14 Commander, U.. Pacific Fleet OCAL and HRC Annual Range Exercise Report 01 October OCAL whale 1 n VI DDG n <200 na OCAL pinniped 2 n VI DDG Y OCAL whale 1 n VI DDG n OCAL dolphin 5 n VI DDG Y <200 OCAL whale 1 n VI CG Y OCAL whale 1 n VI DDG Y OCAL whale 2 n VI CG Y OCAL whale 1 n VI DDG 7 2 unk Y OCAL whale 1 n VI CG Y secured sonar pinniped bearing, ship crs 145, pinniped direction na secured sonar secured sonar secured sonar 6dB dolphin 045 from ship, ship crs 181, dolphin direction whale 175 from ship, ship crs 116, whale direction whale 290 from ship, ship crs 303, whale direction whale 356 from ship, ship crs 055, whale direction whale 275 from ship, ship crs 231, whale direction whale 293 from ship, ship crs 266, whale direction OCAL whale 1 n VI DDG n na OCAL dolphin 3 n VI CG n <200 na 13

15 Commander, U.. Pacific Fleet OCAL and HRC Annual Range Exercise Report 01 October OCAL pinniped 1 n VI CG n na OCAL dolphin 2 n VI DDG Y OCAL dolphin 100 n ACO DDG n dB dolphin 230 from ship, ship crs 338, dolphin direction na OCAL dolphin 5 n VI CG n na OCAL dolphin 20 n ACO DDG n OCAL whale 1 n VI DDG Y OCAL pinniped 8 n VI DDG Y na 10dB 10dB whale 080 from ship, ship crs 201, whale direction pinniped 080 from ship, ship crs 201, pinniped direction OCAL dolphin 10 n VI CG n na OCAL dolphin 10 n VI DDG Y <200 OCAL dolphin 5 n VI DDG Y OCAL dolphin 50 n VI DDG Y secured sonar 6dB dolphin 235 from ship, ship crs 211, dolphin paralleling ship dolphin 190 from ship, ship crs, dolphin direction dolphin 290 from ship, ship crs 160, dolphin direction 14

16 Commander, U.. Pacific Fleet OCAL and HRC Annual Range Exercise Report 01 October OCAL pinniped 1 n VI CG n na OCAL generic ACO DDG 7 Y unk animal 154 from ship, ship crs 256, animal direction OCAL pinniped 1 n VI CG n na OCAL dolphin 3 n VI CG n <200 na OCAL generic ACO DDG 3 Y OCAL generic ACO DDG 2 Y OCAL generic ACO DDG 7 Y OCAL generic ACO DDG 7 Y OCAL dolphin 1 n VI DDG Y OCAL generic ACO DDG Y animal 344 from ship, ship crs 255, animal direction animal 212 from ship, ship crs 255, animal direction animal 255 from ship, ship crs 256, animal direction animal 199 from ship, ship crs 256, animal direction dolphin 070 from ship, ship crs 175, dolphin paralleling ship animal 109 from ship, ship crs 178, animal direction bowriding 15

17 Commander, U.. Pacific Fleet OCAL and HRC Annual Range Exercise Report 01 October OCAL generic ACO DDG Y OCAL dolphin 4 n VI DDG Y OCAL whale 1 n VI DDG Y OCAL whale 1 n VI CG Y OCAL whale 1 n VI DDG Y OCAL dolphin 3 n VI DDG n OCAL whale 1 n VI DDG n OCAL whale 1 n VI DDG Y =not ; VI=visual; ACO=acoustic; y=yes; n=no; na=not applicable; crs=course secured sonar secured sonar 10dB, then secured sonar 6dB animal 277 from ship, ship crs 270, animal direction dolphin 190 from ship, ship crs 258, dolphin direction whale 040 from ship, ship crs 310, whale paralleling ship whale 020 from ship, ship crs 006, whale direction whale 220 from ship, ship crs 269, whale closing ship na na 6dB whale 235 from ship, ship crs 266, whale closing ship 16

18 Commander, U.. Pacific Fleet OCAL and HRC Annual Range Exercise Report 01 October Table 1-ii-5. OCAL MTE Individual Marine Mammal ighting Information 23 Jul 14 Aug. (a) Location (b) pecies (c) # of individuals (d) Calves observed (y/n) (e) Initial detection sensor (f) Platform detection from (g) Length of time observed (min) (h) Wave height (ft) (i) Visibility (nm) (j) onar source in use (y/n) (k) Range (yds) (l) Mitigation implemented (m) If hullmounted source in use, true bearing and animal travel (n) Observed behavior OCAL dolphin 5 n VI DDG Y dolphin 260 from ship, ship crs 040, dolphin paralleling ship OCAL whale 1 n VI DDG n na OCAL whale 1 n VI DDG 3 3 n >2000 na OCAL dolphin 1 n VI DDG 5 n na OCAL whale 6 n VI DDG n OCAL whale 2 n VI DDG Y OCAL whale 9 n VI DDG Y bowriding na 6db 6db whale 085 from ship, ship crs 037, whale closing ship whale 290 from ship, ship crs 197, whale direction OCAL whale 1 n VI DDG n na OCAL whale 1 n VI CG 1 10 n >2000 na OCAL whale 3 n VI DDG n na 17

19 Commander, U.. Pacific Fleet OCAL and HRC Annual Range Exercise Report 01 October OCAL whale 1 n VI DDG n na OCAL whale 6 n VI DDG n OCAL pinniped 9 n VI CG 2 10 Y <200 OCAL whale 2 n VI CG 2 10 Y na secured sonar OCAL pinniped 2 n VI CG 1 10 Y OCAL whale 2 n VI DDG Y <200 10db OCAL whale 1 n VI DDG Y >2000 OCAL dolphin 4 n VI DDG Y <200 secured sonar OCAL dolphin 14 n VI DDG Y <200 secured sonar OCAL whale 1 n VI DDG Y <200 secured sonar OCAL whale 1 n VI DDG Y secured sonar OCAL whale 1 n VI DDG Y >2000 pinniped 300 from ship, ship crs 211, pinniped direction whale 205 from ship, ship crs 210, whale direction pinniped 220 from ship, ship crs 210, pinniped direction whale 010 from ship, ship crs 032, whale direction whale 085 from ship, ship crs, whale direction dolphin 080 from ship, ship crs 057, dolphin direction dolphin 080 from ship, ship crs 058, dolphin direction whale 090 from ship, ship crs 180, whale direction whale 120 from ship, ship crs 180, whale direction whale 210 from ship, ship crs 211, whale direction OCAL whale 4 n VI DDG n na OCAL whale 2 n VI DDG Y secured sonar whale 240 from ship, 18

20 Commander, U.. Pacific Fleet OCAL and HRC Annual Range Exercise Report 01 October OCAL whale 1 n VI DDG Y db OCAL dolphin 16 n VI DDG Y secured sonar OCAL whale 4 n VI DDG n OCAL dolphin 5 n VI DDG n OCAL dolphin 4 n VI DDG Y secured sonar OCAL whale 3 n VI DDG Y ship crs 234, whale direction whale 350 from ship, ship crs 225, whale direction dolphin 125 from ship, ship crs 129, dolphin direction na na 6db OCAL dolphin 25 n VI DDG Y secured sonar OCAL dolphin 12 n VI DDG Y secured sonar OCAL whale 2 n VI DDG n OCAL whale 3 n VI DDG 5 10 Y >2000 OCAL whale 3 n VI DDG 2 10 Y >2000 secured sonar dolphin 210 from ship, ship crs 243, dolphin direction whale 310 from ship, ship crs 301, whale direction dolphin 180 from ship, ship crs 220, dolphin direction dolphin 050 from ship, ship crs 098, dolphin direction bowriding na whale 030 from ship, ship crs 270, whale direction whale 180 from ship, ship crs 177, whale direction OCAL whale 1 n VI DDG 10 n >2000 na OCAL whale 1 n VI DDG 10 Y >2000 whale 320 from ship, ship crs 270, whale direction blowing 19

21 Commander, U.. Pacific Fleet OCAL and HRC Annual Range Exercise Report 01 October OCAL whale 5 n VI DDG n >2000 na OCAL whale 4 n VI DDG Y >2000 OCAL whale 4 n VI DDG 1 10 Y >2000 OCAL whale 2 n VI DDG Y >2000 OCAL whale 2 n VI DDG 2 10 Y >2000 secured sonar OCAL whale 1 n VI DDG 1 10 Y OCAL dolphin 2 n VI DDG Y OCAL dolphin 5 n VI DDG Y OCAL pinniped 2 n VI DDG Y db 10db 6db 10db OCAL whale 5 n VI DDG Y >2000 OCAL whale 7 n VI DDG Y >2000 whale 060 from ship, ship crs 125, whale direction whale 250 from ship, ship crs 270, whale direction whale 248 from ship, ship crs 270, whale direction whale 358 from ship, ship crs, whale direction whale 020 from ship, ship crs, whale direction dolphin bearing, ship crs 304, dolphin direction dolphin 000 from ship, ship crs 001, dolphin direction pinniped 040 from ship, ship crs 120, pinniped direction whale 315 from ship, ship crs 001, whale direction whale 050 from ship, ship crs 315, whale direction OCAL whale 3 n VI DDG n <200 na OCAL whale 3 n VI DDG Y >2000 whale 050 from ship, ship crs 070, whale direction 20

22 Commander, U.. Pacific Fleet OCAL and HRC Annual Range Exercise Report 01 October OCAL whale 5 n VI DDG n <200 na OCAL whale 12 n VI DDG Y <200 secured sonar OCAL whale 5 n VI DDG Y OCAL whale 3 n VI DDG Y db OCAL whale 2 n VI DDG Y <200 secured sonar whale bearing, ship crs 090, whale direction whale bearing, ship crs 315, whale direction whale 259 from ship, ship crs 357, whale direction whale 340 from ship, ship crs 284, whale direction OCAL whale 2 n VI DDG n >2000 na OCAL whale 3 n VI DDG 2 10 Y OCAL whale 1 n VI DDG 2 10 Y OCAL whale 2 n VI DDG 2 10 Y OCAL whale 2 n VI DDG 2 10 Y 6db 10db OCAL whale 2 n VI DDG 2 10 Y <200 secured sonar whale bearing, ship crs 282, whale direction whale bearing, ship crs 284, whale direction whale bearing, ship crs 286, whale direction whale bearing, ship crs 096, whale direction whale bearing, ship crs 145, whale direction OCAL whale 4 n VI DDG 2 10 n unk na OCAL whale 3 n VI DDG 2 10 n unk na OCAL whale 2 n VI DDG 2 10 n unk na OCAL whale 2 n VI DDG 2 10 n unk na 21

23 Commander, U.. Pacific Fleet OCAL and HRC Annual Range Exercise Report 01 October OCAL whale 1 n VI DDG 2 n na OCAL pinniped 3 n VI DDG 2 Y <200 secured sonar OCAL whale 1 n VI DDG 2 Y db OCAL whale 3 n VI DDG 2 Y >2000 OCAL whale 3 n VI DDG 2 Y db OCAL whale 1 n VI DDG 2 Y >2000 OCAL pinniped 4 n VI DDG 2 Y OCAL dolphin 7 n VI DDG 2 Y db 10db OCAL dolphin 12 n VI DDG 2 Y secured sonar pinniped 210 from ship, ship crs 210, pinniped direction whale 220 from ship, ship crs 210, whale direction whale 011 from ship, ship crs 120, whale direction whale 020 from ship, ship crs 344, whale direction whale 220 from ship, ship crs 222, whale direction pinniped 130 from ship, ship crs 060, pinniped direction dolphin 160 from ship, ship crs 121, dolphin direction dolphin 010 from ship, ship crs 053, dolphin direction OCAL dolphin 12 n VI DDG 2 n na OCAL whale 2 n VI DDG 2 n >2000 na OCAL whale 1 n VI DDG 2 Y db OCAL whale 2 n VI DDG 2 Y >2000 whale bearing, ship crs 172, whale direction whale 340 from ship, ship crs 250, whale direction 22

24 Commander, U.. Pacific Fleet OCAL and HRC Annual Range Exercise Report 01 October OCAL whale 2 n VI DDG 2 Y >2000 OCAL whale 1 n VI DDG 2 Y OCAL whale 2 n VI DDG 2 Y OCAL whale 1 n VI DDG 2 Y =not ; VI=visual; ACO=acoustic; y=yes; n=no; na=not applicable; crs=course 6db whale 330 from ship, ship crs 340, whale direction whale 035 from ship, ship crs 343, whale direction whale 330 from ship, ship crs 342, whale direction whale 350 from ship, ship crs 121, whale direction 23

25 Commander, U.. Pacific Fleet OCAL and HRC Annual Range Exercise Report 01 October (iii) Evaluation of effectiveness (based on data gathered during all MTEs) UMMARY: The three categories of mitigation measures (Personnel Training, Lookout and Watchstander Responsibility, and Operating Procedures) outlined in the OCAL Final Environmental Impact tatement/overseas Environmental Impact tatement of December 2008 and approved by NMF in subsequent Letters of Authorization in 2009 and were effective in appropriately mitigating exposure of marine mammals to mid-frequency sonar. During this year s major exercise events, to the maximum extent possible the proscribed NMF safety zones were adhered to, and vessels and aircraft applied mitigation measures when marine mammals were visually observed within the requisite zone. Fleet commanders and ship watch teams continue to improve individual awareness and enhance reporting practices. This improvement can be attributed to the various pre-exercise conferences, mandatory marine species awareness training (MAT), adherence to required MFA mitigation zones, and application of lesson learned in marine mammal sighting and reporting. For the five major training events conducted in OCAL this reporting period (02 Aug 2009 to 01 Aug ), the Navy conducted over 4,127 hours of Marine pecies Awareness Training for 2,795 Navy personnel prior to getting underway. In addition, over the 40 non-consecutive major training event days in this same period (Table 1-iii-1), the Navy performed over 25,835 hours of visual observation (when counting the number of individual watchstanders engaged in lookout or navigation duties times the number of ships involved times the number of days at-sea). OCAL Major Training Event Marine Mammal Observations There were approximately 210 sightings of an estimated 1,217 marine mammals over the course of five major training events in the OCAL Range Complex (Table 1-iii-2, Figure 1-iii-1). Breakdown of sightings by species type were: -Dolphins: 67 sightings of 881 animals (32% of total sightings, 72% of total animals) -Whales: 121 sightings of 273 animals (58% of total sightings, 22% of total animals) -Pinniped: 14 sightings of 63 animals (7% of total sightings, 5% of total animals) Dolphin species in outhern California typically occur in larger pods than whales, hence the higher number of dolphins and larger percentage of total numbers seen in these counts. OCAL Major Training Event Mitigations Of the 210 Navy marine mammal sightings during major training events, there were 62 sightings within 1,000 yards that qualified as a mitigation event (Table 1-iii-3, Figure 1-iii-2). In other, words MFA surface ships had their sonar on, and followed the appropriate mitigation (secure or power down) depending on the range to the marine mammal. These 62 mitigation events represented 29.5% of all marine mammal sightings for an estimated total of 306 marine mammals during this annual reporting period. As stated previously, with dolphins occurring either more frequently or in larger numbers within outhern California, of the 306 marine mammals observed during mitigation events, 218 were dolphins, 50 whales, and 38 pinnipeds (Table 1-iii-3). Of the 62 mitigation events, there were 29 periods when sonar was turned off (i.e., secured) at ranges <200 yards from the ship, 27 periods when sonar power was turned down (i.e., down), and six periods when mitigation did not occur but with the explanations detailed below. There were also three reports of a Navy ship changing course in addition to applying sonar mitigation in order to open the range between the marine mammal and ship. The Navy lost a minimum of 20 hours of training time due to subsequent shut downs and power downs as a result of applying marine mammal mitigation during these sighting events at ranges less than 1,000 yards. There were no reports of any marine mammal behaving in any unusual manner while observing marine mammals for 4.5 hours during mitigation events. 24

26 Commander, U.. Pacific Fleet OCAL and HRC Annual Range Exercise Report 01 October Table 1-iii-1. OCAL Range Complex major training events from 2 August 2009 to 1 August. MTE Type Table 1-iii-2. Total number of marine mammal sightings observed from Navy platforms during OCAL Range Complex major training events from 2 August 2009 to 1 August. pecies Type Dates # of sightings # Of Days % of total sightings # of hips Involved # of marine mammals # Of Marine Mammal ightings % of total number of marine mammals Dolphins 67 32% % Whales % % Pinniped 14 7% 63 5% Unidentified marine mammals 8 4% not not applicable Totals: 210 1,207 Note: Totals represent sum of observations during both MFA\explosive events, and during non-mfa\ non-explosives training periods. Table 1-iii-3. Number of marine mammal sightings at ranges less than 1,000 yards observed from Navy platforms during major training events concurrent with MFA mitigation from 2 August 2009 to 1 August in the OCAL range Complex. Breakdown by species type mitigation range # of sightings total # of marine mammals # of # of # of dolphins whales pinnipeds < 200 yards yards # Of Marine Mammals UTEX November March COMPTUEX 17 March - 2 April May COMPTUEX 23 Jul-14 Aug * 9 * Totals: 40 days 39 ships 210 sightings 1,207 marine mammals Note: * A COMPTUEX occurred from 23 until 14 August. Given this exercise occurred between monitoring report periods which run from Aug to Aug, details from this event are summarized for the period 23 1 Aug. Data from 2 14 August will be included in the 2011 Monitoring Report (Aug to Aug 2011) UTEX = ustainment Exercise COMPTUEX = Composite Training Unit Exercise = Integrated Anti-submarine Warfare Course Phase yards Totals: 62 * 306 * * 62 sightings of 306 marine mammals is 29% of the total sightings and 25% of the total individuals observed during all major training events periods (MFA\explosive and non-mfa\non-explosive periods) (see Table 1-iii-2). 25

27 Commander, U.. Pacific Fleet OCAL and HRC Annual Range Exercise Report 01 October # of sightings 7% 4% 0% 32% pecies dolphins whales 57% pinniped unknown marine mammal # of individuals 63 total, 5% dolphins 273 total, 23% 881 total, 72% whales pinniped unknown marine mammal Figure 1-iii-1. Chart of marine mammal sightings (top panel) and sightings by species type (bottom panel) during OCAL Range Complex major training events from 2 August to 1 August. 26

28 Commander, U.. Pacific Fleet OCAL and HRC Annual Range Exercise Report 01 October # of sightings # of sightings # of sightings # of sightings # of individuals 0 <200 yrds yrds yrds # of dolphins # of dolphins # of dolphins # of whales # of pinnipeds # of whales # of pinnipeds # of whales # of pinnipeds <200 yrds yrds yrds Figure 1-iii-2. Bar chart showing marine mammal sightings concurrent with MFA mitigation (top panel) and breakdown of sightings by species type (bottom panel) from 2 August 2009 to 1 August in the OCAL range Complex. 27

29 Commander, U.. Pacific Fleet OCAL and HRC Annual Range Exercise Report 01 October Navy afety Zone Adherence During this year s major exercise events, to the maximum extent possible the proscribed NMF safety zones were adhered to (see table Table 1-iii-5) with the exceptions noted below. These six cases ranked by range between the marine mammal(s) and ship represent times when mitigation was not performed, although under the agreed to mitigation procedures with NMF no mitigation is required in the case of bowriding dolphins, or if a marine mammal is leaving a mitigation zone. Table 1-iii-4. afety zone exceptions. Range hip Action Analysis < 200 yards 1 pinniped 9 pinnipeds 2 whales yards 1 dolphin 5 dolphins 2 pinnipeds yards 50 dolphins hip did not shut hip did not shut hip down vice shut hip did not power down sonar hip did not power down sonar hip did not power down sonar hip was heading 8 knots, and spotted seal at 050T, or slightly abaft the beam. By the time the seal sighting was received and understood by the bridge, it was already passed and opening (i.e., behind the ship), due in part to the confusion with 2 dolphins spotted at the same time at the same bearing, but beyond the mitigation zones (>1,000 yards). The ship s Officer of the Deck (OOD) realized the dolphins were not an issue, and disregarded other reports coming from the same bearing. By the time it was made clear to the OOD, the seal was outside of the safety zones. By happenstance, a Navy exercise representative was aboard this ship during the event. He conducted training with the ship s bridge team after the incident to explain what happened and provide guidance. Assessment: erroneous initial reporting, then ship soon passed beyond mitigation range. Maximum exposure estimated to be << 189 db given the orientation of the ship hip was heading 211T when sea lions were spotted at 200T, or slighting abaft the starboard beam. Assessment: hip soon passed beyond mitigation range to the pinnipeds. Maximum exposure estimated to be <<189 db given the orientation of the ship hip was heading 032T when whales were spotted 010T, or slightly to the left of the ship s bow. The ship for over an hour until the whales were well clear (>>1,000 yards) behind. Assessment: Maximum exposure estimated to be <179 db. hip was heading 175T when dolphin spotted at 070T approaching the ship from the left rear. Dolphin continued to close and eventually ride the bow wave (bowride). Assessment: dolphins were bowriding, no mitigation required hip was heading 175T when dolphins spotted at 070T approaching the ship from the rear. Dolphins continued to close and eventually ride the bow wave (bowride). Assessment: dolphins were bowriding, no mitigation required hip was heading 210T when pinnipeds spotted at 220T, or slightly off the right bow. Assessment:. Maximum exposure estimated to be <189 db hip was heading 160T when dolphins spotted at 290T, or behind and to the right of the ship closer to the 1000 yard edge of the mitigation zone. hip relative motion quickly put dolphins outside of mitigation range >1000 yards. Assessment: minimum exposure, prior to no mitigation required Relative ship (circleblue arrow) and marine mammal position (square-green arrow) 28

30 Commander, U.. Pacific Fleet OCAL and HRC Annual Range Exercise Report 01 October Table 1-iii-5. OCAL MTEs where sonar was on during detection of marine mammals at ranges less than 1,000 yards, and mitigation conducted. 1) Range [ OCAL ()] 2) MTE 3) Month 4) pecies sighted 5) # of marine mammals sighted 6) Platform 7) Length of time observed (min) 8) Range at which marine mammal sighted 9) Mitigation [secure (D); power down (PD); maneuver ship (MAN) 1 ] 10) Estimate MAX exposure PRIOR to mitigation (db re 1uPa) 2 11) Number of minutes sonar mitigation applied 12) Estimate exposure AFTER mitigation (db re 1uPa) 2 13) DITANCE ship would have moved given length of mitigation and nominal 10- knot ship speed (yds) 14) If hullmounted source in use, true bearing, animal travel 15) Observed behavior Mar Mar Mar Mar Mar Mar Mar Mar dolphin 3 DDG PD, MAN < whale 1 CG 5 <200 D < dolphin 5 DDG D, MAN < whale 1 CG 2 <200 D < DDG PD < pinniped 8 FFG 15 <200 D < dolphin 5 CG D, MAN < whale 1 CG PD < < for 3 min for 15 min for 3 min for 23 min < for 7 min for 56 min for 42 min < for 1 min 1,000 5,000 1,000 7,667 2,333 18,666 14, dolphin 045 from ship, ship crs 239, dolphin opening ship whale 260 from ship, ship crs 319, whale opening ship dolphin 060 from ship, ship crs 263, dolphin opening ship whale 045 from ship, ship crs 266, whale direction animal bearing, ship crs 274, animal direction pinniped 090 from ship, ship crs 076, pinniped closing ship dolphin 330 from ship, ship crs 049, dolphin opening ship whale 080 from ship, ship crs 093, whale paralleling ship tacking to open ship paralleling, CPA 800 yds off port beam 29

31 Commander, U.. Pacific Fleet OCAL and HRC Annual Range Exercise Report 01 October May May May May May May May May May May May May May dolphin 10 DDG PD < whale 1 DDG PD < dolphin 10 DDG D < dolphin 5 DDG D < whale 2 DDG D < pinniped 1 DDG PD < < for 15 min < for 25 min for 8 min for 5 min for 6 min < for 10 min pinniped 1 DDG 2 <200 <189 na <189 na dolphin 2 DDG < na < na dolphin 5 DDG 29 <200 D < whale 1 DDG D < whale 1 DDG D < whale 1 CG PD < dolphin 2 DDG PD < for 29 min for 5 min for 5 min < for 10 min < for 18 min 5,000 8,333 2,667 1,667 2,000 3,333 9,667 1,667 2,333 3,333 6,000 dolphin 070 from ship, ship crs 109, dolphin closing ship whale 290 from ship, ship crs 121, whale direction unk dolphin 320 from ship, ship crs 210, dolphin closing ship dolphin 245 from ship, ship crs 269, dolphin closing ship whale 300 from ship, ship crs 040, whale closing ship pinniped 110 from ship, ship crs 089, pinniped paralleling ship pinniped 050 from ship, ship crs 144, pinniped paralleling ship dolphin 050 from ship, ship crs 144, dolphin opening ship dolphin 045 from ship, ship crs 181, dolphin direction whale 290 from ship, ship crs 303, whale direction whale 275 from ship, ship crs 231, whale direction whale 293 from ship, ship crs 266, whale direction dolphin 230 from ship, ship crs 338, dolphin direction 30

32 Commander, U.. Pacific Fleet OCAL and HRC Annual Range Exercise Report 01 October May May May May May May May May May whale 1 DDG PD < pinniped 8 DDG PD < dolphin 10 DDG 6 <200 D <189 6 dolphin 50 DDG PD < < for 2 min < for 2 min for 6 min < for 142 min dolphin 1 DDG < na < na dolphin 4 DDG D < whale 1 DDG D < whale 1 CG PD, D < whale 1 DDG PD < < for for 10 min for 17 min < for 6 min dolphin 5 DDG < na < na whale 2 DDG PD < < for 36 min pinniped 9 CG 2 <200 <189 na <189 na pinniped 2 CG < na < na ,000 47,333 3,333 3,333 5,667 2,000 12,000 whale 080 from ship, ship crs 201, whale direction pinniped 080 from ship, ship crs 201, pinniped direction dolphin 235 from ship, ship crs 211, dolphin paralleling ship dolphin 290 from ship, ship crs 160, dolphin direction dolphin 070 from ship, ship crs 175, dolphin paralleling ship dolphin 190 from ship, ship crs 258, dolphin direction whale 040 from ship, ship crs 310, whale paralleling ship whale 020 from ship, ship crs 006, whale direction whale 220 from ship, ship crs 269, whale closing ship dolphin 260 from ship, ship crs 040, dolphin paralleling ship whale 085 from ship, ship crs 037, whale closing ship pinniped 300 from ship, ship crs 211, pinniped direction pinniped 220 from ship, ship crs 210, pinniped direction bowriding bowriding 31

33 Commander, U.. Pacific Fleet OCAL and HRC Annual Range Exercise Report 01 October whale 2 DDG 2 <200 PD < dolphin 4 DDG 2 <200 D <189 6 dolphin 14 DDG 2 <200 D <189 6 whale 1 DDG 1 <200 D < whale 1 DDG D < whale 1 DDG PD < whale 2 DDG D < dolphin 16 DDG D < dolphin 4 DDG D < dolphin 25 DDG D < dolphin 12 DDG D < whale 1 DDG PD < dolphin 2 DDG PD < <179 for 60 min for 6 min for 6 min for 63 min for 21 min < for 40 min for 12 min for 10 min for 10 min for 35 min for 30 min < for 12 min < for 30 min 20,000 2,000 2,000 21,000 7,000 13,333 4,000 3,333 3,333 11,667 10,000 4,000 10,000 whale 010 from ship, ship crs 032, whale direction dolphin 080 from ship, ship crs 057, dolphin direction dolphin 080 from ship, ship crs 058, dolphin direction whale 090 from ship, ship crs 180, whale direction whale 120 from ship, ship crs 180, whale direction whale 350 from ship, ship crs 225, whale direction whale 240 from ship, ship crs 234, whale direction dolphin 125 from ship, ship crs 129, dolphin direction dolphin 210 from ship, ship crs 243, dolphin direction dolphin 180 from ship, ship crs 220, dolphin direction dolphin 050 from ship, ship crs 098, dolphin direction whale 020 from ship, ship crs, whale direction dolphin bearing, ship crs 304, dolphin direction bowriding 32

34 Commander, U.. Pacific Fleet OCAL and HRC Annual Range Exercise Report 01 October dolphin 5 DDG PD < pinniped 2 DDG PD < whale 5 DDG PD < whale 12 DDG 20 <200 D < whale 2 DDG 5 <200 D <189 5 whale 1 DDG PD < whale 2 DDG PD < whale 2 DDG <200 D < pinniped 3 DDG <200 D <189 4 whale 1 DDG PD < pinniped 4 DDG PD < dolphin 7 DDG PD < dolphin 12 DDG D < < for 16 min < for 47 min < for 11 min for 20 min for 5 min < for 15 min < for 30 min for 19 min for 4 min < for 30 min < for 13 min < for 3 min for 77 min 5,333 15,667 3,667 6,667 1,667 5,000 10,000 6,333 1,333 10,000 4,333 1,000 25,667 dolphin 000 from ship, ship crs 001, dolphin direction pinniped 040 from ship, ship crs 120, pinniped direction whale bearing, ship crs 315, whale direction whale bearing, ship crs 090, whale direction whale 340 from ship, ship crs 284, whale direction whale bearing, ship crs 284, whale direction whale bearing, ship crs 286, whale direction whale bearing, ship crs 145, whale direction pinniped 210 from ship, ship crs 210, pinniped direction whale 220 from ship, ship crs 210, whale direction pinniped 130 from ship, ship crs 060, pinniped direction dolphin 160 from ship, ship crs 121, dolphin direction dolphin 010 from ship, ship crs 053, dolphin direction 33

35 Commander, U.. Pacific Fleet OCAL and HRC Annual Range Exercise Report 01 October whale 1 DDG PD < whale 1 DDG PD < < for 30 min < for 24 min 10,000 8,000 whale bearing, ship crs 172, whale direction whale 350 from ship, ship crs 121, whale direction Notes: 1 na = not applicable; mitigation not applicable if dolphins are determined to be bowriding. 2 Estimated exposure based on 20Log[R] spherical spreading propagation loss for ranges less than 1000 yards and where nominal MFA source level (L) assumed to be 235 db for DDG s and 225 for FFG s (Urick 1982). Actual operating parameters and oceanographic conditions likely result in lower exposure. This calculation assumes exposure prior to mitigation. Once animal was spotted at the range indicated, applied mitigation would have resulted in much lower to no exposures. Exposure assessment Estimated exposures within 2000 yards can be determined based on standard formulas of how sound propagates in water. pherical spreading is generally valid within 1000 yards from the sound source, and can be expressed as spreading loss (in db from a source) equals 20logR [with R being range from the source in yards (Urick 1982)]. pherical spreading loss in the first 1000 yards equates to 60 db of loss. At ranges between 1000 and 2000 yards the sound waves can become trapped by the sea surface and bottom (depending on water depth and other sound propagation factors) and not expand vertically. The spreading wave then forms an expanding cylinder. Cylindrical spreading loss in db between two points can be calculated by using the formula (10logR 2 /R 1 ). Cylindrical spreading loss between 1000 and 2000 yards equates to an additional 3 db of loss. By the time the sound wave has propagated to 2000 yards, the sonar signal strength has decreased by a total of at least 63 db. Using the AN/Q-53 sonar as an example transmitting at 235 db subtracting the 63 db of spreading loss equates to an estimated sonar Receive Level (RL) of 172 db at 2000 yards. The spreading loss formulas are used to make very conservative assumptions about potential exposure. The formula is an estimation of spreading losses only and does not take into account other factors that could increase the total propagation losses such as oceanographic conditions, attenuation losses, scattering losses, and Navy-unique MFA operating parameters which would result in slightly lower sonar transmit levels. Use of this approach to estimate potential RL at any given animal assumes the horizontal range from a visual sighting accounts for an animal across all depths at which an animal travels to predict the maximum, worst case potential exposure. In other words, this estimated worst case exposure is presented independent of the animal s actual depth level, since a) time and depth of current and previous dives cannot be deduced from a limited surface sighting, and b) oceanographic and tactical conditions influence actual sound propagation at different depths. Given relative motion of ships and animals at sea, the time spent with any given exposure from surface ships is likely to be limited. 34

36 Commander, U. Pacific Fleet OCAL and HRC Annual Range Exercise Report 01 October (2) OCAL AW ummary This section summarizes information from MTEs and non-major training exercises such as unit level training. (i) Total annual hours of each type of sonar source Total annual hours of each type of sonar source used within the OCAL Range Complex between 2 August 2009 and 1 August are presented in the classified appendix to this report. ystem use for the reporting period was less than and sometimes significantly less than the amount authorized. Table 2-i-1. onar allocation within the OCAL Range Complex by source. Authorized MFA sources (c)(1) of NMF OCAL Final Rule and LOA Annually Authorized (i) AN/Q-53 surface ship hull-mounted active sonar (hours) 1,977 (ii) AN/Q-56 surface ship hull-mounted active sonar (hours) 494 (iii) AN/BQQ-10 submarine active sonar (hours) 815 (iv) AN/BQ-15 submarine navigational sonar (hours) 122 (v) AN/AQ-22 helicopter active dipping sonar (# of dips) 2,719 (vi) AN/Q-62 DICA acoustic sonobuoy (# of buoys) 4,256 (vii) Q-125 AEER sonobuoy (# of buoys) 1,150 (viii) Mk-48 heavyweight torpedoes (# of torpedoes) 87 (ix) Mk-46 lightweight torpedoes (# of torpedoes) 84 (x) AN/LQ-25 NIXIE acoustic countermeasure (hours) 1,600 (ii) Cumulative impact report From NMF Final Rule: To the extent practical, the Navy shall develop and implement a method of annually reporting non-major training exercises utilizing hull-mounted sonar. This section shall present an annual (and seasonal, where practicable), depiction of non-major training exercises geographically across the range complex. The annual quantity in hours and breakdown by system of hull-mounted sonar use in the OCAL Range Complex during non-major training events between 2 August 2009 and 1 August is presented in the classified version of this report. The majority of this MFA occurred during short-duration unit-level training (ULT). ULT is typically a single-ship event that normally only lasts for several hours at a time. The geographic extent of non-major training exercise sonar use is depicted in the following figure. 35

37 Commander, U. Pacific Fleet OCAL and HRC Annual Range Exercise Report 01 October Figure 2-ii-1. ULT MFA use in the OCAL Range Complex. 36

38 Commander, U. Pacific Fleet OCAL and HRC Annual Range Exercise Report 01 October (3) OCAL INKEXs No INKEXs were conducted in the OCAL Range Complex during the reporting period. (4) OCAL IEER ummary The annual summary of use within the OCAL Range Complex for Improved Extended Echo-Ranging ystem (IEER) sonobuoys is deemed classified. Data requested from the Navy is presented in the classified version of this report. (5) OCAL Explosives ummary The Navy is in the process of improving the methods used to track explosives use within each range complex. Therefore, NMF requested that the Navy report to the maximum extent practicable as defined in the OCAL Range Complex Final Rule (NMF 2009b). The summary for maritime explosives use within the OCAL Range Complex is presented below. Table 5-1. Explosives usage in the OCAL Range Complex. (i) Total annual number of each type of explosive exercise Amount Annually Authorized % Total Used To Total Authorized Authorized Exercise Total Annual (A) urface-to-gunnery Exercise (- GUNNEX) % (B) Air-to-surface Missile Exercise (A- MLEX) % (C) Bombing Exercise (BOMBEX) % (D) inking Exercise (INKEX) 0 2 0% (E) EER/IEER/AEER Exercise % (ii) Total annual expended/detonated rounds for each explosive type Category (A) 5 naval gunfire rounds 66 (B) 76 mm naval gunfire rounds 0 (C) Maverick missiles 1 (D) Harpoon missiles 0 (E) Mk-82 aerial bombs 0 (F) Mk-83 aerial bombs 0 (G) Mk-84 aerial bombs 0 (H) Mk-48 torpedoes (detonations) 0 (I) Demolition charges 5 (J) EER/IEER explosive sonobuoys 120 Quantity These explosive numbers were collected manually from several different databases that are maintained by separate entities. It is currently estimated that an automated database query tool will be operational in time to be used for next year s explosives data collection. This system will reduce the manpower needed to collect this data and improve reporting accuracy within the OCAL range complex. 37

39 Commander, U. Pacific Fleet OCAL and HRC Annual Range Exercise Report 01 October HAWA RANGE COMPLEX INTRODUCTION The U.. Navy prepared this Annual Range Complex Exercise Report covering the period from 2 August 2009 to 1 August in compliance with the National Marine Fisheries ervice (NMF) Final Rule under the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA) for the Hawaii Range Complex (HRC) (NMF 2009). In the Hawaii Range Complex Letter of Authorization Requirements for monitoring and reporting, the following report subsections were specified and are present within this report for the Hawaii Range Complex: (1) Mid-Frequency Active onar (MFA)/High-Frequency Active onar (HFA) Major Training Exercises (MTE). (i) (ii) (iii) Exercise Information (for each MTE). Individual Marine Mammal ighting Information (for each MTE). Evaluation (based on data gathered during all MTEs) of effectiveness of mitigation measures designed to avoid exposing marine mammals to MFA. This evaluation shall identify the specific observations that support any conclusion the Navy reaches about the effectiveness of the mitigation. (2) Anti-submarine Warfare (AW) ummary (i) (ii) (iii) (iv) Total annual hours of each type of sonar source Total sonar hours (dense humpback areas) Total sonar hours (humpback whale cautionary area) Cumulative Impact Report (3) inking Exercises (INKEX) (i) (ii) Exercise information Individual marine mammal observation information (4) Improved Extended Echo Ranging (IEER)/Advanced Extended Echo Ranging (AEER) ummary (5) Explosives ummary (i) (ii) Total annual number of each type of explosive exercises Total annual expended/detonated rounds for each explosive type This Annual Report covers the period from 2 August 2009 to 1 August, and the information represents the best practical data collection for this period. Due to the data collection and reporting timeline differing from the actual LOA dates, exercise data from 2 August 2009 to 13 January falls under the 2009 HRC Letter of Authorization, while exercise data from 14 January to 1 August falls under the HRC Letter of Authorization. In an effort to provide a better representation of annual exercise data for the HRC, the Navy has combined all exercise data from 2 August 2009 to 1 August and compared it to the annual allocations provided in the HRC Letter of Authorization. This representation of annual exercise data shall be repeated in future Annual Reports. To provide accounting for the entire five year period of the authorization, the Navy will also submit a final report at the end of the five years to provide comprehensive totals of authorized usage. Finally, on review of accumulated reporting metrics, the Navy has determined that certain portions become classified by their summary. Information designated as classified in this report will be submitted to NMF in a separate classified appendix to this report. 38

40 Commander, U. Pacific Fleet OCAL and HRC Annual Range Exercise Report 01 October (1) HRC MFA/HFA Major Training Exercises This section summarizes authorized sonar use and marine mammal observations from MTEs conducted within the HRC between 2 August 2009 and 1 August. For the HRC, MTEs include Rim of the Pacific exercises (RIMPAC), Undersea Warfare Exercises (UWEX), and Multi trike Group Exercises. Between 2 August 2009 and 1 August, there were two MTEs conducted within the HRC. Exercise specific details as described in the HRC Final Rule (DoN 2009a) (f)(1)i to iii and LOA include: (i) Exercise Information (for each MTE) (ii) Individual Marine Mammal ighting Information (for each MTE) (iii) Evaluation (based on data gathered during all MTEs) of the effectiveness of mitigation measures designed to avoid exposing marine mammals to MFA. This evaluation shall identify the specific observations that support any conclusions the Navy reaches about the effectiveness of the mitigation. 39

41 Commander, U. Pacific Fleet OCAL and HRC Annual Range Exercise Report 01 October (i) Exercise information Table H1-i-1. MTEs conducted in the HRC. (i) Exercise (ii) Date (iii) Locations (iv) # and types of active sources used (iv)a Q-53 (iv)b Q-56 (iv)c BQQ-5/10 (iv)d AQ-13F (iv)e AQ-22 (iv)f DICA (v) # and types of passive sources used 7-10 UWEX AUG RIMPAC JUL RIMPAC=Rim of the Pacific Exercise; UWEX=Undersea Warfare Exercise (iv)g LQ-25 Nixie (v)a Q-53 (v)b Q-56 (v)c QR-19 (v)d BQQ-5/10 (iv)e AQ-22 (iv)d AQ-13F (v)e DIFAR onobuoys (vi) # and types of vessels and aircraft participating CG DDG FFG H-60F \H-60R dipping helo H-60B non-dipping helo ubmarines P-3C MPRA Non-AW surface ships (vii) Total hours of observation by watchstanders (hrs) (viii) Total hours of all active sonar (ix) Total hours ea. active source H * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 1 3,478 * * * * * * * * 6, 2, 4 H * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 8 50,098 * * * * * * * * 8, 2, 4 (ix)a Q-53 (ix)b Q-56 (ix)c BQQ-5/10 (ix)d AQ-13F (ix)e AQ-22 (ix)f DICA (ix)g LQ-25 Nixie (x) Wave height (high, low, and average) (ft) H=Hawaii Range Complex *This information is included in the classified appendix to this report. 40

42 Commander, U. Pacific Fleet OCAL and HRC Annual Range Exercise Report 01 October (ii) Individual marine mammal sighting information by exercise Table H1-ii-1. HRC MTE Individual Marine Mammal ighting Information: UWEX 7 10 Aug (a) Location (b) pecies (c) # of individuals (d) Calves observed (y/n) (e) Initial detection sensor (f) Platform detection from (g) Length of time observed (min) (h) Wave height (ft) (i) Visibility (nm) (j) onar source in use (y/n) (k) Range (yds) (l) Mitigation implemented (m) If hullmounted source in use, true bearing and animal travel (n) Observed behavior No applicable sightings* *Marine mammal vocalizations were detected on passive sonar for 30 minutes, but the marine mammals were not detected visually. 41

43 Commander, U. Pacific Fleet OCAL and HRC Annual Range Exercise Report 01 October Table H1-ii-2. HRC MTE Individual Marine Mammal ighting Information: RIMPAC 6 31 Jul. (a) Location (b) pecies (c) # of individuals (d) Calves observed (y/n) (e) Initial detection sensor (f) Platform detection from (g) Length of time observed (min) (h) Wave height (ft) (i) Visibility (nm) (j) onar source in use (y/n) (k) Range (yds) (l) Mitigation implemented (m) If hullmounted source in use, true bearing and animal travel (n) Observed behavior HRC turtle 1 n VI non-aw ship na <200 na swimming HRC dolphin 1 n VI DDG $ na HRC dolphin 1 n VI non-aw ship na na HRC whale 7 n VI FFG n na HRC dolphin 6 n VI FFG n na HRC dolphin 2 n VI CG n na swimming HRC dolphin 7 n VI non-aw ship na na HRC whale 1 n VI CG n >2000 na HRC dolphin 2 n VI DDG $ na blowing HRC whale 1 n VI non-aw aircraft na >2000 na 60 ft whale observed swimming by fighter aircraft at high speed HRC dolphin 1 n VI DDG $ na HRC dolphin 2 n VI non-aw ship na na 42

44 Commander, U. Pacific Fleet OCAL and HRC Annual Range Exercise Report 01 October HRC whale 1 n VI FFG n >2000 na HRC dolphin 2 n VI non-aw ship na na HRC dolphin 5 n VI non-aw ship na na HRC whale 1 n VI MPRA n na floating carcass HRC dolphin 1 n VI DDG $ na HRC dolphin 20 n VI CG n na bowriding HRC dolphin 3 n VI FFG n na bowriding HRC whale 1 n VI non-aw ship na na blowing HRC dolphin 1 n VI MPRA na HRC whale 5 n VI non-aw ship na na HRC dolphin 2 n VI FFG n na HRC whale 1 n VI DDG n na HRC turtle 1 n VI non-aw ship na na HRC turtle 1 n VI non-aw ship na na HRC dolphin 30 n VI non-aw ship na na HRC dolphin 15 n VI DDG $ na HRC whale 1 n VI non-aw ship na na HRC dolphin 7 n VI non-aw ship na na HRC dolphin 2 n VI FFG Y >2000 secured sonar dolphin 137 from ship, ship crs 205, dolphin direction HRC whale 1 n VI FFG n na HRC dolphin 8 n VI non-aw ship na na HRC dolphin 2 n VI non-aw ship na na swimming 43

45 Commander, U. Pacific Fleet OCAL and HRC Annual Range Exercise Report 01 October HRC turtle 1 n VI non-aw ship na na HRC turtle 6 n VI non-aw ship na na HRC whale 1 n VI FFG $ na HRC dolphin 5 n VI FFG $ na HRC dolphin 50 n VI non-aw ship na na HRC dolphin 1 n VI MPRA $ na HRC dolphin 4 n VI non-aw ship na na HRC dolphin 25 n VI non-aw ship na <200 na swimming HRC turtle 9 n VI non-aw ship na <200 na swimming HRC dolphin 6 n VI non-aw ship na na HRC whale 3 n VI non-aw ship na <200 na swimming HRC dolphin 6 n VI non-aw ship na na HRC whale 4 n VI non-aw ship na na HRC dolphin 12 n VI non-aw ship na na HRC dolphin 3 n VI non-aw ship na na HRC whale 2 n VI MPRA $ na HRC dolphin 2 n VI MPRA na HRC dolphin 18 n VI non-aw ship na na HRC turtle 6 n VI non-aw ship na na HRC dolphin 3 n VI non-aw ship na na =not ; VI=visual; ACO=acoustic; y=yes; n=no; na=not applicable; crs=course $=Foreign naval unit; additional information not provided. 44

46 Commander, U. Pacific Fleet OCAL and HRC Annual Range Exercise Report 01 October Although marine mammal sighting details are consistently and thoroughly during OCAL major training exercises, much of the sighting details were not during RIMPAC. Due in large part to the scope of the exercise and its unique, coalition-based command structure, the reporting requirements were bifurcated into separate parts of an instruction. The difference in procedure was not identified by many units, and as a result, those units collected only partial data. This oversight was not discovered until the exercise was complete. In order to ensure complete sighting information is collected in future RIMPAC exercises, the required reports will have command-level visibility and all information will be collected and reviewed daily for completeness. (iii) Evaluation of effectiveness (based on data gathered during all MTEs) Between 2 August 2009 and 1 August, there was one UWEX and one Rim of the Pacific exercise conducted within the Hawaii Range Complex. Navy lookouts 47 marine mammal sightings for an estimated 286 marine mammals. There were zero marine mammal sightings at a range less than 1000 yards concurrent with MFA use. Table H1-iii-1. HRC MTEs from 2 August 2009 to 1 August. # of hips Involved (MFA and non-mfa) # of Marine Mammal ightings MTE Type Month # of Exercise Days UWEX AUG NA RIMPAC JUL Totals: # of Marine Mammals Mitigation Effectiveness Discussion The three categories of mitigation measures (Personnel Training, Lookout and Watchstander Responsibility, and Operating Procedures) outlined in the HRC EI/OEI and approved by NMF (DoN 2008, NMF 2009a, 2009b) were effective in detection appropriately mitigating exposure of marine mammal to mid-frequency sonar. Fleet commanders and ship watch teams continue to improve individual awareness and enhance reporting practices. This improvement can be attributed to the various pre-exercise conferences, mandatory marine species awareness training, and making adjustments based upon the lessons learned. The safety zones were adhered to, and vessels and aircraft applied mitigation measures when marine mammals were visually observed within the requisite zone. Table H1-iii-2. Breakdown of marine mammals sighted in the HRC during MTEs at ranges less than 1000 yards concurrent with MFA use. Range of Marine Mammal ighting < 200 yards yards yards No applicable sightings 45

47 Commander, U. Pacific Fleet OCAL and HRC Annual Range Exercise Report 01 October Table H1-iii-3. HRC MTEs where sonar was on during detection of marine mammals at ranges less than 1,000 yards and mitigation conducted. 1) Range [HRC (H) ] 2) MTE 3) Month 4) pecies sighted 5) # of marine mammals sighted 6) Platform 7) Length of time observed (min) 8) Range at which marine mammal sighted 9) Mitigation [secure (D); power down (PD); maneuver ship (MAN) 1 ] 10) Estimate MAX exposure PRIOR to mitigation (db re 1uPa) 2 11) Number of minutes sonar mitigation applied 12) Estimate exposure AFTER mitigation (db re 1uPa) 2 13) DITANCE ship would have moved given length of mitigation and nominal 10-knot ship speed (yds) 14) If hullmounted source in use, true bearing, animal travel 15) Observed behavior No applicable sightings 46

48 Commander, U. Pacific Fleet OCAL and HRC Annual Range Exercise Report 01 October (2) HRC AW ummary This section summarizes information from MTEs and non-major training exercises such as unit-level training. (i) Total annual hours of each type of sonar source Total annual hours of each type of sonar source used within the HRC between 2 August 2009 and 1 August are presented in the classified appendix to this report. All reporting metrics within the HRC were below the NMF authorized amount. Table H2-i-1. onar allocation within the HRC by source. Authorized MFA sources (c)(1) of NMF HRC Final Rule and LOA Annually Authorized (i) AN/Q-53 surface ship hull-mounted active sonar (hours) 1,284 (ii) AN/Q-56 surface ship hull-mounted active sonar (hours) 383 (iii) AN/AQ-22 or 13 helicopter active dipping sonar (# of dips) 1,010 (iv) AN/Q-62 DICA acoustic sonobuoy (# of buoys) 2,423 (v) Mk-48/Mk-46/Mk-54 torpedoes (# of torpedoes) 313 (vi) AN/BQQ-5/10 submarine active sonar (hours) 200 (ii) Total onar Hours (dense humpback areas) Hull-mounted active sonar use was not within the dense humpback areas plus a 5 km buffer between 15 December 2009 and 15 April. The precise boundaries of these dense humpback areas have yet to be formalized by the U.. Navy and NMF (see figure H2-iv-1). (iii) Total onar Hours (humpback whale cautionary area) Hull-mounted active sonar use was not within the humpback whale cautionary area between 15 December 2009 and 15 April (see figure H2-iv-1). (iv) Cumulative Impact Report From NMF Final Rule: To the extent practical, the Navy shall develop and implement a method of annually reporting non-major training exercises utilizing hull-mounted sonar. This section shall present an annual (and seasonal, where practicable), depiction of non-major training exercises geographically across the range complex. pecific to the HRC only, seasonality refers to reporting of total hull-mounted use within Hawaii s dense humpback areas and humpback cautionary area between 15 December and 15 April. The annual quantity in hours and breakdown by system of hull-mounted sonar use in the HRC during non-major training events between 2 August 2009 and 1 August is presented in the classified appendix to this report. The majority of this MFA occurred during short-duration unit-level training (ULT). ULT is typically a singleship event that normally only lasts for several hours at a time. The geographic extent of seasonal non-major training exercise sonar use is depicted in the following two figures. 47

49 Commander, U. Pacific Fleet OCAL and HRC Annual Range Exercise Report 01 October Figure H2-iv-1. HRC cold season sonar use 15 December April. \ \ -- V /""./... / v / "- ~...,., , I /,~ v,/ I "'"., '\ 1"-. " d I.. ~ DARK GREEN - HRC BOUNDARY LIGHT GREEN - WARNING AREA PURPLE - HAWA OPERATING AREA BLUE - DENE HUMPBACK WHALE AREA RED - ONAR UE BOUNDARIE 48

50 Commander, U. Pacific Fleet OCAL and HRC Annual Range Exercise Report 01 October Figure H2-iv-2. HRC warm season sonar use 2 Aug Dec 2009, and from 16 Apr 1 Aug. / /' DARK GREEN - HRC BOUNDARY \" -/ y LIGHT GREEN - WARNING AREA PURPLE HAWA OPERATING AREA BLUE DENE HUMPBACK WHALE AREA REO - ONAR UE BOUNDARIE ~ / '- O~ V '" t---. ~ I'--- ~ / / '\ ~) ):a- 49

Technical Report. Aircraft Overflight and Noise Analysis. Brisbane, California. December Prepared by:

Technical Report. Aircraft Overflight and Noise Analysis. Brisbane, California. December Prepared by: Aircraft Noise Abatement Office Technical Report Aircraft Overflight and Noise Analysis Brisbane, California Prepared by: P.O. Box 8097 San Francisco, California 94128 (650) 821-5100 Introduction In response

More information

Appendix B Ultimate Airport Capacity and Delay Simulation Modeling Analysis

Appendix B Ultimate Airport Capacity and Delay Simulation Modeling Analysis Appendix B ULTIMATE AIRPORT CAPACITY & DELAY SIMULATION MODELING ANALYSIS B TABLE OF CONTENTS EXHIBITS TABLES B.1 Introduction... 1 B.2 Simulation Modeling Assumption and Methodology... 4 B.2.1 Runway

More information

CAAV VAR 15 DFR Jan-2011 Version 1.0

CAAV VAR 15 DFR Jan-2011 Version 1.0 CAAV VAR 15 DFR 2011 Vietnam Aviation Regulations (VAR) Part 15 REGULATION ON CREW MEMBER DUTY, FLIGHT AND REST PERIOD OF AOC HOLDER 01-Jan-2011 Version 1.0 Contents Contents... 2 SUBPART A: GENERAL...

More information

ETHIOPIA ECAA CIVIL AVIATION RULES AND STANDARDS (ECAR) PART 8 OPERATIONS FATIGUE MANAGEMENT REST PERIODS, DUTY, AND FLIGHT TIME

ETHIOPIA ECAA CIVIL AVIATION RULES AND STANDARDS (ECAR) PART 8 OPERATIONS FATIGUE MANAGEMENT REST PERIODS, DUTY, AND FLIGHT TIME ETHIOPIA ECAA CIVIL AVIATION RULES AND STANDARDS (ECAR) PART 8 OPERATIONS 8.11 - FATIGUE MANAGEMENT 8.12 - REST PERIODS, DUTY, AND FLIGHT TIME 20-NOVEMBER-2013 Contents CONTENTS... 2 DEFINITIONS... 3 8.11

More information

Runway Length Analysis Prescott Municipal Airport

Runway Length Analysis Prescott Municipal Airport APPENDIX 2 Runway Length Analysis Prescott Municipal Airport May 11, 2009 Version 2 (draft) Table of Contents Introduction... 1-1 Section 1 Purpose & Need... 1-2 Section 2 Design Standards...1-3 Section

More information

I FEB Ser SSN768/6% From: Commanding Officer, USS HARTFORD (SSN 768) To : Commander, Submarine Group TWO (01P) Subj: COMMAND HISTORY

I FEB Ser SSN768/6% From: Commanding Officer, USS HARTFORD (SSN 768) To : Commander, Submarine Group TWO (01P) Subj: COMMAND HISTORY DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY USS HARTFORD (SSN 768) FPO AE 09573-2424 From: Commanding Officer, USS HARTFORD (SSN 768) To : Commander, Submarine Group TWO (01P) Ser SSN768/6% I FEB 2003 Subj: COMMAND HISTORY

More information

Recommendations for Northbound Aircraft Departure Concerns over South Minneapolis

Recommendations for Northbound Aircraft Departure Concerns over South Minneapolis Recommendations for Northbound Aircraft Departure Concerns over South Minneapolis March 21, 2012 Noise Oversight Committee Agenda Item #4 Minneapolis Council Member John Quincy Background Summer of 2011

More information

Northeast Stoney Trail In Calgary, Alberta

Northeast Stoney Trail In Calgary, Alberta aci Acoustical Consultants Inc. 5031 210 Street Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6M 0A8 Phone: (780) 414-6373, Fax: (780) 414-6376 www.aciacoustical.com Environmental Noise Computer Modelling For Northeast Stoney

More information

Flight Duty Time and Flight Time Limitations Cabin Crew

Flight Duty Time and Flight Time Limitations Cabin Crew GOVERNMENT OF INDIA OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF CIVIL AVIATION TECHNICAL CENTRE, OPP SAFDURJUNG AIRPORT, NEW DELHI CIVILAVIATIONREQUIREMENT SECTION 7 FLIGHT CREW STANDARDS TRAINING AND LICENSING

More information

PERFORMANCE MEASURE INFORMATION SHEET #16

PERFORMANCE MEASURE INFORMATION SHEET #16 PERFORMANCE MEASURE INFORMATION SHEET #16 ARROW LAKES RESERVOIR: RECREATION Objective / Location Recreation/Arrow Lakes Reservoir Performance Measure Access Days Units Description MSIC 1) # Access Days

More information

Safety and Airspace Regulation Group

Safety and Airspace Regulation Group Page 1 of 11 Airspace Change Proposal - Environmental Assessment Version: 1.0/ 2016 Title of Airspace Change Proposal Change Sponsor Isle of Man/Antrim Systemisation (Revised ATS route structure over the

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 5 P-1 Line #21

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 5 P-1 Line #21 Exhibit P-40, Budget Line Item Justification: PB 2015 Navy Date: March 2014 1507N: Weapons Procurement, Navy / BA 03: Torpedoes and Related Equipment / BSA 1: Torpedoes and Related Equip ID Code (A=Service

More information

TAG Farnborough Airport

TAG Farnborough Airport TAG Farnborough Airport Farnborough Aerodrome Consultative Committee TAG Information Report November 2014 1. Aircraft Movements 1.1 The permitted movement numbers for 2014 are 43,000 movements of which

More information

Subject: Flight Duty Time and Flight Time Limitations Cabin Crew

Subject: Flight Duty Time and Flight Time Limitations Cabin Crew GOVERNMENT OF INDIA OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF CIVIL AVIATION TECHNICAL CENTRE, OPP SAFDURJUNG AIRPORT, NEW DELHI CIVIL AVIATION REQUIREMENT SECTION 7 FLIGHT CREW STANDARDS TRAINING AND LICENSING

More information

Technical Report. Aircraft Noise Analysis. Portola Valley and Woodside, California. July Prepared by: Aircraft Noise Abatement Office

Technical Report. Aircraft Noise Analysis. Portola Valley and Woodside, California. July Prepared by: Aircraft Noise Abatement Office Technical Report Aircraft Noise Analysis Portola Valley and Woodside, California Prepared by: San Francisco International Airport P.O. Box 8097 San Francisco, California 94128 (650) 821-5100 Introduction

More information

WORKING TOGETHER TO ENHANCE AIRPORT OPERATIONAL SAFETY. Ermenando Silva APEX, in Safety Manager ACI, World

WORKING TOGETHER TO ENHANCE AIRPORT OPERATIONAL SAFETY. Ermenando Silva APEX, in Safety Manager ACI, World WORKING TOGETHER TO ENHANCE AIRPORT OPERATIONAL SAFETY Ermenando Silva APEX, in Safety Manager ACI, World Aerodrome Manual The aim and objectives of the aerodrome manual and how it is to be used by operating

More information

NOISE AND FLIGHT PATH MONITORING SYSTEM BRISBANE QUARTERLY REPORT JULY - SEPTEMBER 2011

NOISE AND FLIGHT PATH MONITORING SYSTEM BRISBANE QUARTERLY REPORT JULY - SEPTEMBER 2011 NOISE AND FLIGHT PATH MONITORING SYSTEM BRISBANE QUARTERLY REPORT JULY - SEPTEMBER 211 Date Version Comments Page 2 Foreword Airservices Australia has established a Noise and Flight Path Monitoring System

More information

NOISE AND FLIGHT PATH MONITORING SYSTEM BRISBANE QUARTERLY REPORT OCTOBER - DECEMBER 2013

NOISE AND FLIGHT PATH MONITORING SYSTEM BRISBANE QUARTERLY REPORT OCTOBER - DECEMBER 2013 NOISE AND FLIGHT PATH MONITORING SYSTEM BRISBANE QUARTERLY REPORT OCTOBER - DECEMBER 213 Date Version Comments Page 2 Foreword Airservices Australia has established a Noise and Flight Path Monitoring System

More information

Joint Delta/FAA Demonstration of Supplemental Turbulence Products for Pilots

Joint Delta/FAA Demonstration of Supplemental Turbulence Products for Pilots Joint Delta/FAA Demonstration of Supplemental Turbulence Products for Pilots Delta Air Lines, Inc. requests authorization to demonstrate the feasibility of using a low-cost tablet personal computer (PC)

More information

Pacifica. Short Term Aircraft Noise Monitoring

Pacifica. Short Term Aircraft Noise Monitoring Short Term Aircraft Noise Monitoring March March, Pacifica Prepared for the Oddstad Boulevard Park Pacifica Avenue Neighborhoods by San Francisco International Airport Noise Abatement Office P.O. Box 8097

More information

CHAPTER 5 SEPARATION METHODS AND MINIMA

CHAPTER 5 SEPARATION METHODS AND MINIMA CHAPTER 5 SEPARATION METHODS AND MINIMA 5.1 Provision for the separation of controlled traffic 5.1.1 Vertical or horizontal separation shall be provided: a) between IFR flights in Class D and E airspaces

More information

AIRSERVICES AUSTRALI A

AIRSERVICES AUSTRALI A AIRSERVICES AUSTRALI A NOISE AND FLIGHT PATH MONITORING SYSTEM BRISBANE QUARTERLY REPORT JANUARY - MARCH 211 Page 2 Foreword Airservices Australia has established a Noise and Flight Path Monitoring System

More information

GHANA CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY

GHANA CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY GHANA CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY ADVISORY CIRCULAR AC-08-011-003 Crew Flight Duty & Rest Periods Section 1... 3 1.1 Applicability... 3 1.2 Definitions... 3 1.3 Acronyms... 4 1.4 Knowledge or Suspicion of

More information

DGCA FDTL 2016: FLIGHT DUTY TIME AND FLIGHT TIME LIMITATIONS - CABIN CREW MEMBER

DGCA FDTL 2016: FLIGHT DUTY TIME AND FLIGHT TIME LIMITATIONS - CABIN CREW MEMBER DGCA FDTL 2016: FLIGHT DUTY TIME AND FLIGHT TIME LIMITATIONS - CABIN CREW MEMBER DGCA CAR J I (Issue III) Effective 01-Sep-2016 Table of Contents Table of Contents... 2 1 INTRODUCTION... 4 1.1 The Annex

More information

NOISE AND FLIGHT PATH MONITORING SYSTEM MELBOURNE QUARTERLY REPORT JULY - SEPTEMBER 2011

NOISE AND FLIGHT PATH MONITORING SYSTEM MELBOURNE QUARTERLY REPORT JULY - SEPTEMBER 2011 NOISE AND FLIGHT PATH MONITORING SYSTEM MELBOURNE QUARTERLY REPORT JULY - SEPTEMBER 211 Date Version Comments Page 2 Foreword Airservices Australia has established a Noise and Flight Path Monitoring System

More information

Date: 01 Aug 2016 Time: 1344Z Position: 5441N 00241W

Date: 01 Aug 2016 Time: 1344Z Position: 5441N 00241W AIRPROX REPORT No 2016157 Date: 01 Aug 2016 Time: 1344Z Position: 5441N 00241W Location: Langwathby PART A: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION REPORTED TO UKAB Recorded Aircraft 1 Aircraft 2 Aircraft AS365 King Air

More information

NOISE AND FLIGHT PATH MONITORING SYSTEM MELBOURNE QUARTERLY REPORT JULY - SEPTEMBER 2013

NOISE AND FLIGHT PATH MONITORING SYSTEM MELBOURNE QUARTERLY REPORT JULY - SEPTEMBER 2013 NOISE AND FLIGHT PATH MONITORING SYSTEM MELBOURNE QUARTERLY REPORT JULY - SEPTEMBER 213 Date Version Comments Page 2 Foreword Airservices Australia has established a Noise and Flight Path Monitoring System

More information

AIRSERVICES AUSTRALI A

AIRSERVICES AUSTRALI A AIRSERVICES AUSTRALI A NOISE AND FLIGHT PATH MONITORING SYSTEM BRISBANE QUARTERLY REPORT APRIL - JUNE 211 Date Version Comments Page 2 Foreword Airservices Australia has established a Noise and Flight

More information

DAMAGE ASSESSMENT OF SAND FENCING GARDEN CITY, NORTH LITCHFIELD AND LITCHFIELD BEACH GEORGETOWN COUNTY, SC

DAMAGE ASSESSMENT OF SAND FENCING GARDEN CITY, NORTH LITCHFIELD AND LITCHFIELD BEACH GEORGETOWN COUNTY, SC OF SAND FENCING GARDEN CITY, NORTH LITCHFIELD AND LITCHFIELD BEACH GEORGETOWN COUNTY, SC June 07, 2017 PREPARED FOR: GEORGETOWN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICES PREPARED BY: The EARTHWORKS Group 11655

More information

(DRAFT) AFI REDUCED VERTICAL SEPARATION MINIMUM (RVSM) RVSM SAFETY POLICY

(DRAFT) AFI REDUCED VERTICAL SEPARATION MINIMUM (RVSM) RVSM SAFETY POLICY (DRAFT) AFI REDUCED VERTICAL SEPARATION MINIMUM (RVSM) RVSM SAFETY POLICY 26 May 04 TABLE OF CONTENTS CONTENTS... PAGE SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION...3 SECTION 2: RVSM OPERATIONAL CONCEPT...3 SECTION 3: AFI

More information

NOISE AND FLIGHT PATH MONITORING SYSTEM MELBOURNE QUARTERLY REPORT OCTOBER - DECEMBER 2012

NOISE AND FLIGHT PATH MONITORING SYSTEM MELBOURNE QUARTERLY REPORT OCTOBER - DECEMBER 2012 NOISE AND FLIGHT PATH MONITORING SYSTEM MELBOURNE QUARTERLY REPORT OCTOBER - DECEMBER 212 Date Version Comments Page 2 Foreword Airservices Australia has established a Noise and Flight Path Monitoring

More information

FINAL REPORT West Coast Naval Training Range Demonstration of Glider-Based Passive Acoustic Monitoring

FINAL REPORT West Coast Naval Training Range Demonstration of Glider-Based Passive Acoustic Monitoring DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. FINAL REPORT West Coast Naval Training Range Demonstration of Glider-Based Passive Acoustic Monitoring John A. Hildebrand

More information

Annex/FANS 17. ADS/CPDLC Report EUR/SAM Corridor: Index. Systems Direction Navigation and Surveillance Division. 2. Traffic Data Summary

Annex/FANS 17. ADS/CPDLC Report EUR/SAM Corridor: Index. Systems Direction Navigation and Surveillance Division. 2. Traffic Data Summary Annex/FANS 17 ADS/CPDLC Report EUR/SAM Corridor: 2017 Systems Direction Navigation and Surveillance Division Index 2. Traffic Data Summary 3. Airlines Aircraft types 4. CRM 2017 results 5. Conclusions

More information

MEASUREMENT OF NAVY AND COAST GUARD VESSELS

MEASUREMENT OF NAVY AND COAST GUARD VESSELS MEASUREMENT OF NAVY AND COAST GUARD VESSELS TONNAGE GUIDE 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. PURPOSE...3 2. REFERENCES...3 3. APPLICABILITY...3 4. U.S. TONNAGE MEASUREMENT...3 (a) MEASUREMENT SYSTEMS...3 (b) APPLICABILITY...4

More information

Canada CAR s FTDT. Part VII - Commercial Air Services Subpart 0 - General Division III. Flight Time and Flight Duty Time Limitations and Rest Periods

Canada CAR s FTDT. Part VII - Commercial Air Services Subpart 0 - General Division III. Flight Time and Flight Duty Time Limitations and Rest Periods Canada CAR s FTDT Part VII - Commercial Air Services Subpart 0 - General Division III Flight Time and Flight Duty Time Limitations and Rest Periods Gazette - 1 Contents Contents... 2 DIVISION I GENERAL...

More information

STOCKTON POLICE DEPARTMENT GENERAL ORDER UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEM SUBJECT. DATE: November 14, 2017 NO: V-6

STOCKTON POLICE DEPARTMENT GENERAL ORDER UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEM SUBJECT. DATE: November 14, 2017 NO: V-6 STOCKTON POLICE DEPARTMENT GENERAL ORDER UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEM SUBJECT DATE: November 14, 2017 NO: FROM: CHIEF ERIC JONES TO: ALL PERSONNEL INDEX: UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEM I. PURPOSE The purpose of

More information

Vessel Based Marine Mammal Survey Off Kaua'i, January 2012

Vessel Based Marine Mammal Survey Off Kaua'i, January 2012 FINAL REPORT Vessel Based Marine Mammal Survey Off Kaua'i, January 2012 30 July 2012 Suggested Citation: HDR. 2012. Vessel-based Marine Mammal Survey off Kaua'i, 11-19 January 2012. Submitted to Naval

More information

O Hare Noise Compatibility Commission Technical Committee April 19, Proposed Interim Fly Quiet Runway Rotation Plan

O Hare Noise Compatibility Commission Technical Committee April 19, Proposed Interim Fly Quiet Runway Rotation Plan O Hare Noise Compatibility Commission Technical Committee April 19, 2016 Proposed Interim Fly Quiet Runway Rotation Plan O HARE MODERNIZATION ROD - FLY QUIET Record of Decision (ROD) was issued on September

More information

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY USS MARYLAND (SSBN 738) FPO AA Ser NAV/ Mar 94 From: Commanding Officer, USS MARYLAND (SSBN 738) (GOLD) To

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY USS MARYLAND (SSBN 738) FPO AA Ser NAV/ Mar 94 From: Commanding Officer, USS MARYLAND (SSBN 738) (GOLD) To DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY USS MARYLAND (SSBN 738) FPO AA -2-2129 5757 Ser NAV/112 25 Mar 94 From: Commanding Officer, USS MARYLAND (SSBN 738) (GOLD) To : Director of Naval History (OP-09BH), Washington Navy

More information

MULTIDISCIPLINARYMEETING REGARDING GLOBAL TRACKING

MULTIDISCIPLINARYMEETING REGARDING GLOBAL TRACKING International Civil Aviation Organization Global Tracking 2014-WP/1 5/5/14 WORKING PAPER MULTIDISCIPLINARYMEETING REGARDING GLOBAL TRACKING Montréal, 12 May to 13 May 2014 Agenda item 1: Explore the need

More information

CASCADE OPERATIONAL FOCUS GROUP (OFG)

CASCADE OPERATIONAL FOCUS GROUP (OFG) CASCADE OPERATIONAL FOCUS GROUP (OFG) Use of ADS-B for Enhanced Traffic Situational Awareness by Flight Crew During Flight Operations Airborne Surveillance (ATSA-AIRB) 1. INTRODUCTION TO ATSA-AIRB In today

More information

EMS AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS

EMS AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS Monterey County EMS System Policy Policy Number: 4070 Effective Date: Jan. 1, 2015 Review Date: June 30, 2018 EMS AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS I. AUTHORITY California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 9,

More information

Short Term Monitoring Program NSW, Caringbah Report. February 2013

Short Term Monitoring Program NSW, Caringbah Report. February 2013 NSW, Caringbah Report February 2013 Version Control Version Number Date Detail 1.0 February 2013 Initial Release. 2.0 May 2013 Updated formatting for table 2. 3.0 January 2014 Figure 5 and L90 values updated

More information

SJC North and South Flow

SJC North and South Flow SJC North and South Flow Pre and Post OAPM Date: January 2018 Phases of Flight ATCC ARTCC ATCC 2 AviationTerms VFR- Visual Flight Rules. Pilots must maneuver to avoid clouds and are responsible for their

More information

Dallas Executive Airport

Dallas Executive Airport 648 DECLARED DISTANCE OPTION 1a DISPLACE 31 THRESHOLD BY 97 Considers RSA Limiting Factor No runway extensions 13 31 TORA 6,451 6,451 TODA 6,451 6,451 ASDA 5,958 6,451 LDA 5,958 6,354 Runway 17-35 (3,8

More information

FIXED ROUTE DASHBOARD JULY 2018

FIXED ROUTE DASHBOARD JULY 2018 FIXED ROUTE DASHBOARD JULY 2018 Safety Max Target Goal Preventable Collisions per 100k Miles Non-Preventable Collisions per 100k Miles Total Incidents per 10,000 Boardings 1.6 1.3 0.8 2.63 2.1 2.0 1.60

More information

1.1.3 Taxiways. Figure 1-15: Taxiway Data. DRAFT Inventory TYPICAL PAVEMENT CROSS-SECTION LIGHTING TYPE LENGTH (FEET) WIDTH (FEET) LIGHTING CONDITION

1.1.3 Taxiways. Figure 1-15: Taxiway Data. DRAFT Inventory TYPICAL PAVEMENT CROSS-SECTION LIGHTING TYPE LENGTH (FEET) WIDTH (FEET) LIGHTING CONDITION 1.1.3 Taxiways EWN has an extensive network of taxiways and taxilanes connecting the terminal, air cargo, and general aviation areas with the runways as listed in Figure 1-15. A 50-foot wide parallel taxiway

More information

Updates to Procedures at St. John s International Airport

Updates to Procedures at St. John s International Airport October 10, 2017 Updates to Procedures at St. John s International Airport This document provides notice of upcoming changes to instrument procedures being implemented by NAV CANADA at the St. John s International

More information

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA OFFICE OF DIRECTOR GENERAL OF CIVIL AVIATION

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA OFFICE OF DIRECTOR GENERAL OF CIVIL AVIATION GOVERNMENT OF INDIA OFFICE OF DIRECTOR GENERAL OF CIVIL AVIATION ANSS AC NO. 1 of 2017 31.07. 2017 Air Space and Air Navigation Services Standard ADVISORY CIRCULAR Subject: Procedures to follow in case

More information

Noise Oversight Committee

Noise Oversight Committee Noise Oversight Committee May 8, 2014 Audio/Video recordings are made of this meeting 1 Item 1 Review and Approve Draft Meeting Minutes Minutes from March 19, 2014 2 Item 2 Review of Operations Report

More information

According to FAA Advisory Circular 150/5060-5, Airport Capacity and Delay, the elements that affect airfield capacity include:

According to FAA Advisory Circular 150/5060-5, Airport Capacity and Delay, the elements that affect airfield capacity include: 4.1 INTRODUCTION The previous chapters have described the existing facilities and provided planning guidelines as well as a forecast of demand for aviation activity at North Perry Airport. The demand/capacity

More information

Whale Watching Tourism in the Kingdom of Tonga

Whale Watching Tourism in the Kingdom of Tonga Whale Watching Tourism in the Kingdom of Tonga Preliminary Report for the Pacific Islands Forum October 2007 A report for the International Fund for Animal Welfare and Opérations Cétacés Prepared by: Introduction:

More information

From,: Commanding Officer, USS MARYLAND (SSBN 738)(BLUE) To: Director of Naval History (NOgBH), Washington Navy Yard, Washington, DC

From,: Commanding Officer, USS MARYLAND (SSBN 738)(BLUE) To: Director of Naval History (NOgBH), Washington Navy Yard, Washington, DC DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY USS MARYLAND (SSBN 738) FPO AA 34092-2129 5750 Ser 738B/126 30 MAR 98 From,: Commanding Officer, USS MARYLAND (SSBN 738)(BLUE) To: Director of Naval History (NOgBH), Washington Navy

More information

REVIEW OF GOLD COAST AIRPORT Noise Abatement Procedures

REVIEW OF GOLD COAST AIRPORT Noise Abatement Procedures REVIEW OF GOLD COAST AIRPORT Noise Abatement Procedures Introduction The purpose of this document is to present an overview of the findings of the review of the Noise Abatement Procedures (NAPs) in place

More information

Short Term Monitoring Program NSW, Carlingford Report. February 2013

Short Term Monitoring Program NSW, Carlingford Report. February 2013 NSW, Carlingford Report February 2013 Version Control Version Number Date Detail 1.0 February 2013 Initial Release. 2.0 May 2013 Updated formatting for table 2. 3.0 January 2014 Figure 5 and L90 values

More information

Fly Quiet Report. 3 rd Quarter November 27, Prepared by:

Fly Quiet Report. 3 rd Quarter November 27, Prepared by: November 27, 2017 Fly Quiet Report Prepared by: Sjohnna Knack Program Manager, Airport Noise Mitigation Planning & Environmental Affairs San Diego County Regional Airport Authority 1.0 Summary of Report

More information

SIKORSKY AIRCRAFT CORPORATION

SIKORSKY AIRCRAFT CORPORATION Page 1 2012-23-13 SIKORSKY AIRCRAFT CORPORATION Amendment 39-17269 Docket No. FAA-2012-1206; Directorate Identifier 2012-SW-021-AD PREAMBLE (a) Applicability This AD applies to Model S-70, S-70A, and S-70C

More information

fll,' The University of Georgia O tfo:c o f rh.: Vu:.: Pre,id.:nt for Research

fll,' The University of Georgia O tfo:c o f rh.: Vu:.: Pre,id.:nt for Research November 30, 2015 fll,' - - - ----- I M.$------- The University of Georgia ------------------9 O tfo:c o f rh.: Vu:.: Pre,id.:nt for Research U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Management System

More information

With the completion of this project, we would like to follow-up on the projections as well as highlight a few other items:

With the completion of this project, we would like to follow-up on the projections as well as highlight a few other items: TO: FROM: Mayor and Council Interim City Manager Rebecca Underhill, Director of Finance DATE: February 28, 2014 SUBJECT: Water Meter Project Analysis On March 28, 2012, Acting City Manager Mike Loftin

More information

ILS APPROACH WITH B737/A320

ILS APPROACH WITH B737/A320 ILS APPROACH WITH B737/A320 1. Introduction This documentation will present an example of Instrument landing system (ILS) approach performed with Boeing 737. This documentation will give some tips also

More information

Part 171. Aeronautical Telecommunication Services - Operation and Certification. CAA Consolidation. 10 March 2017

Part 171. Aeronautical Telecommunication Services - Operation and Certification. CAA Consolidation. 10 March 2017 Part 171 CAA Consolidation 10 March 2017 Aeronautical Telecommunication Services - Operation and Certification Published by the Civil Aviation Authority of New Zealand DESCRIPTION Part 171 provides the

More information

Executive Summary. MASTER PLAN UPDATE Fort Collins-Loveland Municipal Airport

Executive Summary. MASTER PLAN UPDATE Fort Collins-Loveland Municipal Airport Executive Summary MASTER PLAN UPDATE Fort Collins-Loveland Municipal Airport As a general aviation and commercial service airport, Fort Collins- Loveland Municipal Airport serves as an important niche

More information

GUIDANCE MATERIAL CONCERNING FLIGHT TIME AND FLIGHT DUTY TIME LIMITATIONS AND REST PERIODS

GUIDANCE MATERIAL CONCERNING FLIGHT TIME AND FLIGHT DUTY TIME LIMITATIONS AND REST PERIODS GUIDANCE MATERIAL CONCERNING FLIGHT TIME AND FLIGHT DUTY TIME LIMITATIONS AND REST PERIODS PREAMBLE: Guidance material is provided for any regulation or standard when: (a) (b) The subject area is complex

More information

1. Purpose and scope. a) the necessity to limit flight duty periods with the aim of preventing both kinds of fatigue;

1. Purpose and scope. a) the necessity to limit flight duty periods with the aim of preventing both kinds of fatigue; ATTACHMENT A. GUIDANCE MATERIAL FOR DEVELOPMENT OF PRESCRIPTIVE FATIGUE MANAGEMENT REGULATIONS Supplementary to Chapter 4, 4.2.10.2, Chapter 9, 9.6 and Chapter 12, 12.5 1. Purpose and scope 1.1 Flight

More information

LARGE HEIGHT DEVIATION ANALYSIS FOR THE WESTERN ATLANTIC ROUTE SYSTEM (WATRS) AIRSPACE CALENDAR YEAR 2016

LARGE HEIGHT DEVIATION ANALYSIS FOR THE WESTERN ATLANTIC ROUTE SYSTEM (WATRS) AIRSPACE CALENDAR YEAR 2016 International Civil Aviation Organization Seventeenth meeting of the GREPECAS Scrutiny Working Group (GTE/17) Lima, Peru, 30 October to 03 November 2017 GTE/17-WP/07 23/10/17 Agenda Item 4: Large Height

More information

Aircraft Noise. Why Aircraft Noise Calculations? Aircraft Noise. SoundPLAN s Aircraft Noise Module

Aircraft Noise. Why Aircraft Noise Calculations? Aircraft Noise. SoundPLAN s Aircraft Noise Module Aircraft Noise Why Aircraft Noise Calculations? Aircraft Noise Aircraft noise can be measured and simulated with specialized software like SoundPLAN. Noise monitoring and measurement can only measure the

More information

ANALYSIS OF THE CONTRIUBTION OF FLIGHTPLAN ROUTE SELECTION ON ENROUTE DELAYS USING RAMS

ANALYSIS OF THE CONTRIUBTION OF FLIGHTPLAN ROUTE SELECTION ON ENROUTE DELAYS USING RAMS ANALYSIS OF THE CONTRIUBTION OF FLIGHTPLAN ROUTE SELECTION ON ENROUTE DELAYS USING RAMS Akshay Belle, Lance Sherry, Ph.D, Center for Air Transportation Systems Research, Fairfax, VA Abstract The absence

More information

Date: 14 Jun 2017 Time: 1600Z Position: 5121N 00102W Location: 7nm NW Blackbushe airport

Date: 14 Jun 2017 Time: 1600Z Position: 5121N 00102W Location: 7nm NW Blackbushe airport AIRPROX REPORT No 2017113 Date: 14 Jun 2017 Time: 1600Z Position: 5121N 00102W Location: 7nm NW Blackbushe airport PART A: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION REPORTED TO UKAB Recorded Aircraft 1 Aircraft 2 Aircraft

More information

USE OF RADAR IN THE APPROACH CONTROL SERVICE

USE OF RADAR IN THE APPROACH CONTROL SERVICE USE OF RADAR IN THE APPROACH CONTROL SERVICE 1. Introduction The indications presented on the ATS surveillance system named radar may be used to perform the aerodrome, approach and en-route control service:

More information

Airport Noise Management System Chicago Midway International Airport

Airport Noise Management System Chicago Midway International Airport 2 nd Quarter 2017 Quarterly Report Airport Noise Management System Visit the Midway Noise webpage on the Internet at www.flychicago.com/midwaynoise Airport Noise Management System Quarterly Report Report

More information

CAA NZ CAR 121 Subpart K 30-Oct-2017 CAR 125 Subpart K 30-Oct-2017 CAR 135 Subpart K 30-Oct-2017 AC Oct-2006 AC Aug-2011 Fatigue of

CAA NZ CAR 121 Subpart K 30-Oct-2017 CAR 125 Subpart K 30-Oct-2017 CAR 135 Subpart K 30-Oct-2017 AC Oct-2006 AC Aug-2011 Fatigue of CAA NZ CAR 121 Subpart K 30-Oct-2017 CAR 125 Subpart K 30-Oct-2017 CAR 135 Subpart K 30-Oct-2017 AC 119-2 27-Oct-2006 AC 119-3 12-Aug-2011 Fatigue of Flight Crew Table of Contents DESCRIPTION...5 A Part

More information

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY USS ELROD (FFG 55) FLEET POST OFFICE MIAMI SO9

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY USS ELROD (FFG 55) FLEET POST OFFICE MIAMI SO9 DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY USS ELROD (FFG 55) FLEET POST OFFICE MIAMI 94091-1 SO9 5750 FFG55/01 :db Ser 111 23 March 1990 From: Commanding Officer, USS ELROD (FFG 55) To : Commanding Officer, Naval Historical

More information

Airport Noise Management System Chicago Midway International Airport

Airport Noise Management System Chicago Midway International Airport 4 th Quarter 2018 Quarterly Report Airport Noise Management System Visit the Midway Noise webpage on the Internet at www.flychicago.com/midwaynoise Airport Noise Management System Quarterly Report Report

More information

Instrument Proficiency Check Flight Record

Instrument Proficiency Check Flight Record Instrument Proficiency Check Flight Record Date: Flight Time: Sim. Inst. Time: Pilot Name: Aircraft Type: Aircraft Tail Number: Act. Inst. Time: Instructor Name: Holding Procedures Task Notes N/A Satisfactory

More information

Sound Transit Operations June 2016 Service Performance Report. Ridership

Sound Transit Operations June 2016 Service Performance Report. Ridership Ridership Total Boardings by Mode Mode Jun-15 Jun-16 % YTD-15 YTD-16 % ST Express 1,622,222 1,617,420-0.3% 9,159,934 9,228,211 0.7% Sounder 323,747 361,919 11.8% 1,843,914 2,099,824 13.9% Tacoma Link 75,396

More information

AVIATION RULES OF THE KYRGYZ REPUBLIC APKR-6 "OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT" Annex 6 Flight time limitations and flight duty time 01-Sep-2016

AVIATION RULES OF THE KYRGYZ REPUBLIC APKR-6 OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT Annex 6 Flight time limitations and flight duty time 01-Sep-2016 AVIATION RULES OF THE KYRGYZ REPUBLIC APKR-6 "OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT" Annex 6 Flight time limitations and flight duty time 01-Sep-2016 Contents Contents... 2 1 Definitions... 3 2 Purpose and scope... 3

More information

Air Operator Certification

Air Operator Certification Civil Aviation Rules Part 119, Amendment 15 Docket 8/CAR/1 Contents Rule objective... 4 Extent of consultation Safety Management project... 4 Summary of submissions... 5 Extent of consultation Maintenance

More information

California State University Long Beach Policy on Unmanned Aircraft Systems

California State University Long Beach Policy on Unmanned Aircraft Systems California State University, Long Beach June 14, 2016 Policy Statement: 16-04 California State University Long Beach Policy on Unmanned Aircraft Systems The following policy statement was recommended by

More information

SMS HAZARD ANALYSIS AT A UNIVERSITY FLIGHT SCHOOL

SMS HAZARD ANALYSIS AT A UNIVERSITY FLIGHT SCHOOL SMS HAZARD ANALYSIS AT A UNIVERSITY FLIGHT SCHOOL Don Crews Middle Tennessee State University Murfreesboro, Tennessee Wendy Beckman Middle Tennessee State University Murfreesboro, Tennessee For the last

More information

Final. Hydroacoustic and Airborne Monitoring at the Naval Station. Mayport Interim Report June 2015

Final. Hydroacoustic and Airborne Monitoring at the Naval Station. Mayport Interim Report June 2015 Final Hydroacoustic and Airborne Monitoring at the Naval Station Submitted to: Naval Facilities Engineering Command Atlantic under HDR Environmental, Operations and Construction, Inc. Contract No. N62470-10-D-3011,

More information

NETWORK MANAGER - SISG SAFETY STUDY

NETWORK MANAGER - SISG SAFETY STUDY NETWORK MANAGER - SISG SAFETY STUDY "Runway Incursion Serious Incidents & Accidents - SAFMAP analysis of - data sample" Edition Number Edition Validity Date :. : APRIL 7 Runway Incursion Serious Incidents

More information

THE SOCIETY OF EXPERIMENTAL TEST PILOTS STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES

THE SOCIETY OF EXPERIMENTAL TEST PILOTS STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES THE SOCIETY OF EXPERIMENTAL TEST PILOTS STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES SOP 4-4 DATE 2-16-72 REV 7-15-82 11-17-96 10-19-00 1-24-08 3-28-14 2-25-16 10-25-17 SUBJECT: AUTHORITY: INSTRUCTIONS TO MEMBERSHIP

More information

ATM Network Performance Report

ATM Network Performance Report ATM Network Performance Report 2018. Page 1 of 16 Table of contents Summary... 3 Network Wide Performance... 4 Airborne delay... 4 Sydney... 6 Airborne delay... 6 Notable events... 6 Melbourne... 9 Airborne

More information

Special Conditions: CFM International, LEAP-1A and -1C Engine Models; Incorporation

Special Conditions: CFM International, LEAP-1A and -1C Engine Models; Incorporation This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 11/14/2014 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2014-27019, and on FDsys.gov [4910-13] DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

More information

1.0 OUTLINE OF NOISE ANALYSIS...3

1.0 OUTLINE OF NOISE ANALYSIS...3 Table of Contents 1.0 OUTLINE OF NOISE ANALYSIS...3 2.0 METHODOLOGY...3 2.1 BACKGROUND...3 2.2 COMPUTER MODELING...3 3.0 EXISTING NOISE ENVIRONMENT...4 3.1 EXISTING SANTA MONICA MUNICIPAL AIRPORT NOISE...4

More information

U.S. Coast Guard - American Waterways Operators Annual Safety Report

U.S. Coast Guard - American Waterways Operators Annual Safety Report American Waterways Operators U.S. Coast Guard - American Waterways Operators Annual Safety Report National Quality Steering Committee Meeting August 3, 216 Established Safety Metrics For 16 years, the

More information

Short Term Monitoring Program Tarragindi Report, QLD

Short Term Monitoring Program Tarragindi Report, QLD Short Term Monitoring Program Change Summary Version 1: 30 Aug 2013 Section/ Clause Summary NRFC Table of Contents 1. Deployment Details...3 1.1 Deployment Purpose...3 1.2 Deployment Monitoring Period...3

More information

Gleim Airline Transport Pilot FAA Knowledge Test 2014 Edition, 1st Printing Updates May 2014

Gleim Airline Transport Pilot FAA Knowledge Test 2014 Edition, 1st Printing Updates May 2014 Page 1 of 5 Gleim Airline Transport Pilot FAA Knowledge Test 2014 Edition, 1st Printing Updates May 2014 NOTE: Deleted text is displayed with a line through the text. New text is shown with a blue background.

More information

Airport Noise Management System Chicago Midway International Airport

Airport Noise Management System Chicago Midway International Airport 4 th Quarter 2017 Quarterly Report Airport Noise Management System Visit the Midway Noise webpage on the Internet at www.flychicago.com/midwaynoise Airport Noise Management System Quarterly Report Report

More information

Forecast of Aviation Activity

Forecast of Aviation Activity DETROIT METROPOLITAN WAYNE COUNTY AIRPORT FAR PART 150 NOISE COMPATIBILITY STUDY UPDATE CHAPTER B FORECAST OF AVIATION ACTIVITY Forecast of Aviation Activity Introduction This chapter summarizes past aviation

More information

Airport Noise Management System Chicago O Hare International Airport

Airport Noise Management System Chicago O Hare International Airport December 218 Monthly Report Airport Noise Management System Chicago O Hare International Airport Visit the O Hare Noise webpage on the Internet at www.flychicago.com/ordnoise Airport Noise Management System

More information

1.0 PURPOSE. a) Ensure safe movement with the objective of preventing collisions between aircraft, and between aircraft and obstacles;

1.0 PURPOSE. a) Ensure safe movement with the objective of preventing collisions between aircraft, and between aircraft and obstacles; 1.0 PURPOSE Page 1 of 5 The purpose of this Advisory Circular (AC) is to provide guidance to the aerodrome operators in adopting operational procedures and principles for apron management. The aerodrome

More information

DCA Airport Noise. MWAA WG Dec 15, 2016

DCA Airport Noise. MWAA WG Dec 15, 2016 DCA Airport Noise MWAA WG Dec 15, 2016 BACKGROUND FAA Next Gen noise Analyzed on macro level Data below 3K Ft under estimated community level impacts Primary focus has been on departure procedures 1 part

More information

Shortened Settlement Cycle Industry Steering Committee charter

Shortened Settlement Cycle Industry Steering Committee charter Shortened Settlement Cycle Industry Steering Committee charter Date: September 10 th, 2014 www.ust2.com I. Purpose The Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation (DTCC), in consultation with the industry,

More information

LOW VISIBILITY OPERATION

LOW VISIBILITY OPERATION 1. Introduction LOW VISIBILITY OPERATION Low visibility procedures exist to support low visibility operations at aerodromes. Low visibility procedures (LVP) means procedures applied at an aerodrome for

More information

AIRSPACE CO-ORDINATION NOTICE Safety and Airspace Regulation Group ACN Reference: Version: Date: Date of Original

AIRSPACE CO-ORDINATION NOTICE Safety and Airspace Regulation Group ACN Reference: Version: Date: Date of Original AIRSPACE CO-ORDINATION NOTICE Safety and Airspace Regulation Group ACN Reference: Version: Date: Date of Original 2016-06-0532 V2 15 June 2016 15 June 2016 BRITISH GLIDING ASSOCIATION : COMPETITIONS 2016

More information

Participant Presentations (Topics of Interest to the Meeting) GASP SAFETY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS. (Presented by the Secretariat) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Participant Presentations (Topics of Interest to the Meeting) GASP SAFETY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS. (Presented by the Secretariat) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PA RAST/31 WP/03 19/02/18 Thirty First Pan America Regional Aviation Safety Team Meeting (PA RAST/31) of the Regional Aviation Safety Group Pan America (RASG PA) South Florida, United States, 20 to 22

More information

Airport Noise Management System Chicago Midway International Airport

Airport Noise Management System Chicago Midway International Airport 1 st Quarter 2018 Quarterly Report Airport Noise Management System Midway International Airport Visit the Midway Noise webpage on the Internet at www.flychicago.com/midwaynoise Airport Noise Management

More information

Surveillance and Broadcast Services

Surveillance and Broadcast Services Surveillance and Broadcast Services Benefits Analysis Overview August 2007 Final Investment Decision Baseline January 3, 2012 Program Status: Investment Decisions September 9, 2005 initial investment decision:

More information

Airport Noise Management System Chicago Midway International Airport

Airport Noise Management System Chicago Midway International Airport 3 rd Quarter 2018 Quarterly Report Airport Noise Management System Visit the Midway Noise webpage on the Internet at www.flychicago.com/midwaynoise Airport Noise Management System Quarterly Report Report

More information