DAMAGE ASSESSMENT OF SAND FENCING GARDEN CITY, NORTH LITCHFIELD AND LITCHFIELD BEACH GEORGETOWN COUNTY, SC

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "DAMAGE ASSESSMENT OF SAND FENCING GARDEN CITY, NORTH LITCHFIELD AND LITCHFIELD BEACH GEORGETOWN COUNTY, SC"

Transcription

1 OF SAND FENCING GARDEN CITY, NORTH LITCHFIELD AND LITCHFIELD BEACH GEORGETOWN COUNTY, SC June 07, 2017 PREPARED FOR: GEORGETOWN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICES PREPARED BY: The EARTHWORKS Group HIGHWAY 707 MURRELLS INLET, SC /07/ Highway 707 P.O. Box 201 Murrells Inlet, South Carolina Phone: (843) Facsimile: (843)

2 I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DAMAGE ASSESSMENT The EARTHWORKS Group was retained to evaluate the current condition of sand fencing throughout various public beaches located in Georgetown County including: Garden City, North Litchfield, and South Litchfield. This evaluation was to document storm surge damage from Hurricane Matthew in October, The damages found observing the sand fencing include the detachment of fencing materials from fencing posts, damage to the posts, or complete destruction of fencing all together. The cause of damage can be directly attributed to hydrodynamic forces and submersion from the storm surge. Observations and estimates of various beaches have been categorized by seven phases to identify locations with previously installed sand fencing, locations of public access, and public beach locations corresponding with private communities. Phase I of these seven was a primary focus of sand fence observations to identify damage as this phase corresponded with previously installed fencing located in the northern portion of Garden City. The majority of locations observed in Phase I, and elsewhere, during site assessments were identified to have no remnants of sand fencing remaining seaward of the observed primary dunes. This was primarily due to erosion and impact forces related to the storm surge. Few locations observed had existing fence posts remaining, which were no longer plumb and with no fencing material present. Even fewer were locations which both posts and fencing materials were present. Dune and beach conditions were observed during assessments as well. A majority of locations showed signs of sand erosion following Hurricane Matthew. Indicators of sand loss were typically escarpments on the seaward side of sand dunes and observable sand loss around wooden post foundations for dune crossover structures. The majority of the damage observed is directly attributable to the storm surge from Hurricane Matthew. Matthew had an estimated surge of 6 feet above mean high water (MHW). High water and breaking waves destroyed a majority of the structures on the active beach immediately adjacent to the MHW mark including wooden walkovers and sand fencing. Erosion of sand between 3 to 5 feet in depth from the face of the primary dunes was a secondary cause of damage due to the depth to which many of the fence posts were installed. Based on the observed sand erosion from Hurricane Matthew, sand fencing is a good option to promote regrowth of dunes through capturing wind-driven sand throughout all beaches and not just at Phase I locations. Efforts have been performed and completed by Georgetown County at the date of this report to rebuild the beaches along the southern portion of Garden City through dredging of Murrells Inlet. Sand fencing will provide a passive method to re-building the dunes after its installation with minor maintenance in the years following. The installation of new sand fencing throughout Garden City, North Litchfield, and Litchfield beaches is recommended to ensure efforts have been made to re-build the dunes as a damage mitigation factor for future storm events. This recommendation includes the installation of two rows of sand fencing, covering approximately 6.7 miles of shoreline, and consisting of approximately 3,650 V shaped fences assemblies

3 II. INTRODUCTION The EARTHWORKS Group was retained to evaluate the current condition of sand fencing throughout various public beaches located in Georgetown County including; Garden City, North Litchfield, and Litchfield Beach. This evaluation was to document storm surge damage from Hurricane Matthew in October, Sand fencing typically consist of wooden fence posts and wood-slat fencing meshed with galvanized wire stapled to fence posts arranged in a triangular shape. The purpose of this fencing is to promote deposition of wind-driven sand and limit sand loss due to wind erosion. Photo 1 - Aerial View from Litchfield, SC to Garden City, SC (courtesy of Google Earth) Hurricane Matthew made landfall on October 8 th, 2016 southeast of McClellanville, South Carolina as a Category I hurricane with 75 mph winds. The affected beach areas received a storm surge of approximately 6 feet above a MHW. This was estimated by USGS at 7.5 ft MSL in the North American Vertical Datum 1988 (NAVD88), based on provisional data. The resulting damage to all fencing on the beach included hydrodynamic loads, impact loads from debris, and soil erosion/scour from the storm surge. For the purposes of this report and determination of approximate quantities and costs, the following phases were established to discuss separate portions of Georgetown County Beaches: Phase I: Garden City I. Locations of previously installed sand fencing to be repaired based on observed damage from Hurricane Matthew. Phase II: Garden City II. Remaining portion of Garden City beaches observed for existing sand fencing and damages caused by Hurricane Matthew Phase III: Garden City Inlet Harbour. Shoreline corresponding with private community at the southern peninsula of Garden City. Phase IV: N. Litchfield. Beaches located in North Litchfield beginning at the southern property line of Huntington Beach State Park and ending at the northern portion of Litchfield by the Sea

4 Phase V: N. Litchfield Litchfield by the Sea. Shoreline corresponding with private community located between North Litchfield and Litchfield beaches. Phase VI: Litchfield Beach. Beaches spanning from Litchfield Inn to the southern most public access (Public Access 66) of Litchfield Beach. Phase VII: Litchfield Beach Inlet Point. Beach corresponding with the private community located South of Public Access 66. III. METHODOLOGY Assessment of sand fencing condition included visual inspection of individual fencing elements and photo-documentation to determine the appropriate steps required to replenish sand fencing. Erosion of sand dunes and beaches was observed through measurable escarpments on the seaward side of primary dunes and measurable heights of discolored piles (on elevated wooden walkovers) indicating soil loss. Exterior elements were photographed to document existing conditions and the location of Georgetown County public accesses were used as references for the stretch of beaches observed. The assessment was conducted from the ground. No intrusive or destructive testing was required during these observations to determine the extent of sand fence damage. The photographs contained in this report are typical of the conditions found, all photographs were not included. Specific design of repairs or corrective actions were developed concurrently with this assessment and any fence design reflects the Ocean & Coastal Resource Management (OCRM) guidelines for sand fence construction, including V shaped sections with a minimum section spacing. Sand fencing and beaches were observed seaward of the primary dune line and assessed based on the following criteria: 1. Is the entire sand fencing assembly missing? 2. Are any fencing posts remaining, plumb, and of sound embedment? 3. Is any of the fencing material still intact? - 4 -

5 IV. SUMMARY OF SAND FENCING OBSERVATIONS GARDEN CITY PHASE I & PHASE II Phase I & Phase II correspond with Public Access No. 01 through No. 44 located along S. Waccamaw Drive. Phase I corresponds with the three stretches of sand fencing previously installed by Georgetown County and spanning approximately 4,200 feet. These locations correspond with a short section of fencing located between Public Accesses No. 01 and No.02 and the majority of the beaches between Public Access No. 06 through No. 25. Phase I observations were performed to access the required portion of existing fencing to be reconstructed. Phase II is comprised of the remaining shoreline between the Horry/Georgetown County Line and Public Access No. 44 excluding locations covered in Phase I. Observation of these beaches was to document the existing condition of the beach, seaward dune lines, and observe for any sand fencing following both Hurricane Matthew and the beach nourishment efforts performed by Georgetown County. The total length of this phase is approximately 10,000 feet. Phase I and Phase II observations are discussed in the individual comments to follow provided for each Public Access in chronological order. Public Access 01 is the northern most access for Georgetown County and the following accesses to the South are numbered in ascending order. Public accesses are utilized as staging points to reference the photos and comments. Phase I and Phase II are labeled for each access s page as these two phases are mixed throughout the Garden City beaches. Individual access observations are provided within Appendix C to document the estimated length of beach observed at each access (typically spanning South to the next access). This estimated length along with observations of remaining sand fencing elements was utilized in the determination of estimated quantities for re-construction and photo-documentation is provided to as evidence to the observed damages along the coastline. GARDEN CITY: INLET HARBOUR PHASE III Phase III covers the remaining beaches located in Garden City not included in either Phase I or II. This phase includes approximately 1,900 feet of shoreline adjacent to the Inlet Harbour private community located at the southern end of Garden City. The length of beach at this location was utilized to provide an estimated quantity of sand fencing required to protect this stretch of beach for Georgetown County s consideration to install sand fencing at this location. NORTH LITCHFIELD PHASE IV Phase IV includes beaches corresponding with Public Access No. 45 through Public Access No. 59, spanning from the southern property line of Huntington Beach State Park to the northern boundaries of the Litchfield by the Sea community. This phase includes approximately 6,600 feet of shoreline and was observed to document the existing condition of the beach, primary dune condition, and observe for any sand fencing following Hurricane Matthew. Phase IV observations are discussed on a per public access basis in Appendix C, similar to Phase I & II. Photos and description of observations for any existing sand fencing and dune conditions are provided to document the damages sustained along this stretch of beach. Dune escarpment along this portion of shoreline is pronounced and can be measured up to four feet in height on vertical faces of dunes which lost sands due to erosion

6 LITCHFIELD BY THE SEA PHASE V Phase V covers the shoreline adjacent to the Litchfield by the Sea community and spans South to the Litchfield Inn, just North of Public Access 60. This phase includes approximately 6,200 feet of beach along the community and this length was utilized to provide an estimated quantity of sand fencing required to protect this stretch of beach for Georgetown County s consideration to install sand fencing at this location. LITCHFIELD BEACH PHASE VI Phase VI includes the public beaches spanning from Public Access No. 60 South of Litchfield Inn on Norris Drive through Public Access No. 66. This phase includes approximately 2,060 feet of shoreline and was observed to document the existing condition of the beach, primary dune condition, and observe for any sand fencing following Hurricane Matthew. Phase VI observations are included within Appendix C based on assessments performed at Public Accesses. Photos documenting existing conditions and discussion for each public access location is provided to document the damages sustained along this stretch of beach. Dune escarpment along this portion of shoreline is pronounced and can also be measured up to four feet in height. LITCHFIELD BEACH: INLET POINT PHASE VII Phase VII encompasses the beach adjacent to the Inlet Point community located on the South end of Litchfield Beach beyond Public Access No. 66. This portion includes approximately 4,580 feet of beach along the Inlet Point community. This measurement was used to determine an estimated quantity of sand fencing assemblies required to protect this stretch of beach for Georgetown County s consideration to install sand fencing at this location. GENERAL OVERVIEW Based on observations throughout Georgetown County (see Appendix C ) the majority of observed damages included sand/dune loss evidenced in soil failures at dune faces, leaving escarpments behind and observation of supporting sands removed around timber supports on dune cross overs. The escarpments observed were measured up to four feet in height at various locations. The vast majority of locations were observed to have no reusable elements of sand fencing to aide in the reconstruction of fencing. Few locations along the North portion of Garden City (Phase I & II locations) hosted fencing posts, none of which appeared to be reusable based on their out-of-plumb condition or deterioration observed on the posts. Based on these observations, the regrowth of dunes is important as a mitigation effort for future storms and the lack of sand fencing in the beaches current state will not aide in the promotion of dune growth. Sand fencing installation throughout all beaches would be required to provide assistance to rebuilding the dunes via capturing eroded sands, as no fencing is currently installed providing this action on a large scale at the time of this report

7 V. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS DAMAGE ASSESSMENT This summary is based on observed conditions at the public beach access walkovers in Garden City, North Litchfield, and Litchfield Beach, SC. This assessment was intended to document the current condition of the sand fencing and identify areas of damage that resulted from the Hurricane Matthew storm surge in October Typical sand fencing assembly consist of wooden posts with galvanized wire mesh fencing stapled to the posts. Observed damage to all fencing on the beaches included hydrodynamic and impact loads from debris and soil erosion of the beach/dunes due to the storm surge. The assessment was conducted from the ground and photo-documentation was used to record observable damage. Damage observed throughout all the above-mentioned beaches can be classified as one, or multiple, of the following observed occurrences: 1. Total failure: no fencing material or posts remaining. Typical of locations where heavy dune erosion was observable 2. Fencing failure: connector and/or wire stays failed during storm surge and fencing material was detached from fence posts 3. Scour/Erosion around posts: fencing posts no longer plumb due to combination of hydrodynamic forces during storm surge and movement of supporting soils The majority of the damage observed was total failure of sand fencing components and no components remaining during assessment for locations which previously hosted sand fencing. Various locations which did not exhibit total failure typically had only posts remaining. Few locations were observed where the existing fencing material was remaining. Based on this assessment, the damage to the seaward dune lines and sand fencing was substantial in terms of beach loss and structural damage to walkovers. While nourishment efforts have been performed for the southern end of Garden City to rebuild the beach, the remaining beaches and dunes are reliant on natural processes to rebuild the damaged dunes. These dunes are vital for protection from storm surges. It is our recommendation that sand fencing be installed along the entirety of the three beaches to promote dune growth that will help mitigate against future hurricane events. The re-construction of sand fencing along Garden City, North Litchfield and Litchfield Beaches will entail the construction of two (2) rows of sand fencing and result in the construction of approximately 3,650 sand fence assemblies. These assemblies consist of approximately 11,000 fencing posts and 73,000 linear feet of fencing material. A single fencing assembly refers to a V shaped section per the OCRM guidelines for sand fence construction (see details provided within Appendix A ). Total opinion of probable cost determined for the installation of double row sand fencing for all phases within this scope of work was approximately $212,000. Appendix A provides a broad overview of public beaches within Georgetown County which are discussed within this report and locations of public accesses are marked for referencing purposes. The seven phases utilized to distinguish beaches are depicted within this Appendix A and approximate dimensions for the lengths of fencing to be installed

8 APPENDIX A ESTIMATED QUANTITIES - 8 -

9 APPENDIX A ESTIMATED QUANTITIES Based on the observed sand loss and lack of sand fencing to promote natural dune regrowth, estimations were conducted for each phase to determine 100% installation of both single and double row sand fencing for the consideration of Georgetown County officials in determining the correct locations to provide new fencing. Table A.1 below shows the breakdown of total beach length and quantities of fencing assemblies (three posts and fencing in a V shape) for each respective phase. Table A.1: Sand Fencing Quantities SAND FENCING QUANTITIES PHASE DESCRIPTION QUANTITY OF SAND FENCING TOTAL ASSEMBLIES [EA] BEACH LENGTH [FT] SINGLE ROW DOUBLE ROW INSTALLATION INSTALLATION I GARDEN CITY - PREVIOUSLY FENCED 4, II GARDEN CITY - REMAINING BEACH 9, ,030 III GARDEN CITY - INLET HARBOUR 1, IV NORTH LITCHFIELD 6, V LITCHFIELD BY THE SEA 6, VI LITCHFIELD BEACH 2, VII LITCHFIELD BEACH - INLET POINT 4, TOTAL : 35,440 1,825 3,650 Determination of the above estimated quantities was based on the fence design included within Appendix D using OCRM s guidelines for sand fence construction. This V shaped section of sand fencing spans approximately 14.2 linear feet parallel with the shoreline and utilized a five foot spacing between each V section in the same row

10 APPENDIX B OPINION OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS

11 APPENDIX B OPINION OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCITON COSTS Based on the approximate quantities required for each phase, the following opinion of probable costs has been prepared using anticipated installation and material costs for posts, fencing materials, and miscellaneous small tools required to accomplish this construction task. Table B.1 below shows the probable construction costs for each phase for both single and double row installations. Table B.1: Opinion of Probable Construction Costs SAND FENCING OPINION OF PROBABLE COST OPINION OF PROBABLE COST PHASE DESCRIPTION SINGLE ROW INSTALLATION DOUBLE ROW INSTALLATION I GARDEN CITY - PREVIOUSLY FENCED $12, $24, II GARDEN CITY - REMAINING BEACH $29, $59, III GARDEN CITY - INLET HARBOUR $5, $11, IV NORTH LITCHFIELD $19, $39, V LITCHFIELD BY THE SEA $18, $37, VI LITCHFIELD BEACH $6, $12, VII LITCHFIELD BEACH - INLET POINT $13, $27, TOTAL : $105, $211, The determination of the opinion of probable costs listed above was achieved using an assumed dollar value of $3.00 per post (material), $1.00 per linear foot of sand fencing (material), and $2.00 per linear foot of sand fencing (installation). These numbers appear consistent with anticipated construction costs and were utilized within Coastal Science & Engineering s letter RE: Hurricane Matthew Information for FEMA [CSE 2416] dated 12/21/2016 regarding the damages and reconstruction of beaches for the Town of Edisto Beach located in Edisto Beach, South Carolina. Determination of quantities for the above opinion of probable costs was based on the fence design included within Appendix D using OCRM s guidelines for sand fence construction. This V shaped section of sand fencing spans approximately 14.2 linear feet parallel with the shoreline and utilized approximately 20 linear feet of sand fencing material and three fence posts per V section

12 APPENDIX C OBSERVATIONS & DISCUSSIONS

13 PUBLIC ACCESS #1 (PHASE I & II) 557 S. Waccamaw Drive and Yucca Ave. PUBLIC ACCESS 01 (MARCH 2017) The beach observed at this location included 330 feet to the north of PA 01 to the Horry/Georgetown County Line and spanned approximately 494 feet from PA 01 South to the next public The dunes at this location experienced great erosion and no profile of dunes was present during observations. No remnants of sand fencing were observed at this stretch of beach. BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 01. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 01. (MARCH 2017) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 01. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 01. (MARCH 2017)

14 PUBLIC ACCESS #2 (PHASE II) 746 S. Waccamaw Drive & Moonfish Ln approximately 314 feet South to the next public The dunes at this location experienced great erosion and little to no profile of dunes was present during observations. Previously covered seawalls can be observed to be uncovered. No remnants of sand fencing were observed at this stretch of beach. PUBLIC ACCESS 02 (MARCH 2017) PA 02 OBSERVABLE SAND LOSS. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 01. (MARCH 2017) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 02. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 02. (MARCH 2017)

15 PUBLIC ACCESS #3 (PHASE II) 830 S. Waccamaw Drive approximately 304 feet South to the next public The dunes at this location experienced great erosion and little to no profile of dunes was present during observations. Previously covered seawalls can be observed to be uncovered by approximately three feet. PUBLIC ACCESS 03 (MARCH 2017) Fence posts were observed at this stretch of beach and no remnants of other components were observed. The remaining posts are not reusable due to not being plumb and deterioration associated with age and exposure. BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 03. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 03. (MARCH 2017) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 03. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 03. (MARCH 2017)

16 PUBLIC ACCESS #4 (PHASE II) 860 S. Waccamaw Drive approximately 321 feet South to the next public The dunes at this location experienced great erosion and some profile of dunes was present during observations. Dune began to be observed from this access and further south. No remnants of re-usable sand fencing materials were observed at this stretch of beach. PUBLIC ACCES 04 (FEB. 2017) BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 04. (MARCH 2017) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 04. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 04. (MARCH 2017)

17 PUBLIC ACCESS #5 (PHASE II) 892 S. Waccamaw Drive PUBLIC ACCESS 05 (NOV. 2016) approximately 305 feet South to the next public The dunes at this location experienced observable erosion with a loss of up to four feet of sand as indicated by exposed structural members on dune crossovers which were previously covered. No remnants of sand fencing were observed at this stretch of beach. BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 05. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 05. (MARCH 2017) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 05. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 05. (MARCH 2017)

18 PUBLIC ACCESS #6 (PHASE I & II) 918 S. Waccamaw Drive approximately 313 feet South to the next public The dunes at this location experienced erosion of sands up to three feet as observed from adjacent structures. No remnants of sand fencing were observed at this stretch of beach. PUBLIC ACCESS 06. (MARCH 2017) BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 06. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 06. (MARCH 2017) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 06. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 06. (MARCH 2017)

19 PUBLIC ACCESS #7 (PHASE I & II) 950 S. Waccamaw Drive approximately 308 feet South to the next public The dunes at this location experienced erosion of sands up to three feet as observed from adjacent structures. PUBLIC ACCESS 07, OBSERVABLE SAND EROSION AFTER MATTHEW (NOV. 2016) Fence posts were observed at this stretch of beach and no remnants of other components were observed. The remaining posts are not reusable due to not being plumb and deterioration associated with age and exposure. BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 07. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 07. (MARCH 2017) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 07. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 07. (MARCH 2017)

20 PUBLIC ACCESS #8 (PHASE I) 978 S. Waccamaw Drive approximately 320 feet South to the next public The dunes at this location experienced erosion on the seaward face of dunes and appeared one of the locations of minor erosion based on condition of remaining structures and dunes. PUBLIC ACCESS 08, MAJORITY COVERED IN DUNE (NOV. 2016) Fence posts were observed at this stretch of beach and no remnants of other components were observed. The remaining posts are not reusable due to not being plumb and deterioration associated with age and exposure. BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 08. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 08. (MARCH 2017) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 08. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 08. (MARCH 2017)

21 PUBLIC ACCESS #9 (PHASE I) 1010 S. Waccamaw Drive approximately 309 feet South to the next public The dunes at this location experienced erosion of sands up to two feet as observed from adjacent structures. PUBLIC ACCESS 09 W/ OBSERVABLE SAND EROSION (NOV. 2016) Fence posts were observed at this stretch of beach and no remnants of other components were observed. The remaining posts are not reusable due to not being plumb and deterioration associated with age and exposure. BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 09. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 09. (MARCH 2017) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 09. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 09. (MARCH 2017)

22 PUBLIC ACCESS #10 (PHASE I) 1032 S. Waccamaw Drive PUBLIC ACCESS 10 (NOV. 2016) approximately 676 feet South to the next public The dunes at this location experienced erosion of sands up to four feet as observed from adjacent structures. Fence posts were observed at this stretch of beach and no remnants of other components were observed. The remaining posts are not reusable due to not being plumb and deterioration associated with age and exposure. BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 10. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 10. (MARCH 2017) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 10. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 10. (MARCH 2017)

23 PUBLIC ACCESS #11 (PHASE I) 1108 S. Waccamaw Drive PUBLIC ACCESS 11 (NOV. 2016) approximately 184 feet South to the next public The dunes at this location experienced erosion of sands up to a foot as observed from the remaining dunes. Fence posts were observed at this stretch of beach and no remnants of other components were observed. The remaining posts are not reusable due to not being plumb and deterioration associated with age and exposure. BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 11. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 11. (MARCH 2017) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 11. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 11. (MARCH 2017)

24 PUBLIC ACCESS #12 (PHASE I) 1122 S. Waccamaw Drive approximately 184 feet South to the next public The dunes at this location experienced erosion on the seaward face of dunes and appeared one of the locations of minor erosion based on condition of remaining structures and dunes. PUBLIC ACCESS 12 (NOV. 2016) Fence posts were observed at this stretch of beach and no remnants of other components were observed. The remaining posts are not reusable due to not being plumb and deterioration associated with age and exposure. BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 12. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 12. (MARCH 2017) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 12. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 12. (MARCH 2017)

25 PUBLIC ACCESS #13 (PHASE I) 1140 S. Waccamaw Drive approximately 181 feet South to the next public The dunes at this location experienced erosion on the seaward face of dunes and appeared one of the locations of minor erosion based on condition of remaining structures and dunes. PUBLIC ACCESS 13 WITH HEAVY DUNE COVERAGE ON SIDES (NOV. 2016) Fence posts were observed at this stretch of beach and no remnants of other components were observed. The remaining posts are not reusable due to not being plumb and deterioration associated with age and exposure. BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 13. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 13. (MARCH 2017) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 13. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 13. (MARCH 2017)

26 PUBLIC ACCESS #14 (PHASE I) 1156 S. Waccamaw Drive PUBLIC ACCESS approximately 181 feet South to the next public The dunes at this location experienced erosion of sands up to three feet as observed from the existing structures. Fence posts were observed at this stretch of beach and no remnants of other components were observed. The remaining posts are not reusable due to not being plumb and deterioration associated with age and exposure. BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 14. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 14. (MARCH 2017) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 14. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 14. (MARCH 2017)

27 PUBLIC ACCESS #15 (PHASE I) 1176 S. Waccamaw Drive PUBLIC ACCESS approximately 174 feet South to the next public The dunes at this location experienced erosion of sands up to two feet as observed from the remaining structures and dunes. Fence posts were observed at this stretch of beach and no remnants of other components were observed. The remaining posts are not reusable due to not being plumb and deterioration associated with age and exposure. BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 15. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 15. (MARCH 2017) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 15. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 15. (MARCH 2017)

28 PUBLIC ACCESS #16 (PHASE I) 1190 S. Waccamaw Drive DUNE LINE NORTH OF P.A. 16 (NOV. 2016) approximately 177 feet South to the next public The dunes at this location experienced erosion of sands up to three feet as observed from adjacent dune crossovers. Fence posts were observed at this stretch of beach and no remnants of other components were observed. The remaining posts are not reusable due to not being plumb and deterioration associated with age and exposure. BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 16. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 16. (MARCH 2017) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 16. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 16. (MARCH 2017)

29 PUBLIC ACCESS #17 (PHASE I) 1208 S. Waccamaw Drive PUBLIC ACCESS 17 FROM STREET (MARCH 2017) approximately 178 feet South to the next public The dunes at this location experienced erosion of sands in excess of a foot as observed from the remaining dunes. Fence posts were observed at this stretch of beach and no remnants of other components were observed. The remaining posts are not reusable due to not being plumb and deterioration associated with age and exposure. BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 17. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 17. (MARCH 2017) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 17. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 17. (MARCH 2017)

30 PUBLIC ACCESS #18 (PHASE I) 1224 S. Waccamaw Drive PUBLIC ACCESS 18 (NOV. 2016) approximately 175 feet South to the next public The dunes at this location experienced erosion of sands up to two feet as observed from the remaining dunes and adjacent structures. Fence posts were observed at this stretch of beach and no remnants of other components were observed. The remaining posts are not reusable due to not being plumb and deterioration associated with age and exposure. BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 18. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 18. (MARCH 2017) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 18. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 18. (MARCH 2017)

31 PUBLIC ACCESS #19 (PHASE I) 1240 S. Waccamaw Drive PUBLIC ACCESS 19 (NOV. 2016) approximately 146 feet South to the next public The dunes at this location experienced erosion of sands up to a foot as observed from the remaining dunes. Fence posts were observed at this stretch of beach and no remnants of other components were observed. The remaining posts are not reusable due to not being plumb and deterioration associated with age and exposure. BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 19. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 19. (MARCH 2017) REMAINING POSTS NOT PLUMB (MAR. 2016) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 19. (MARCH 2017)

32 PUBLIC ACCESS #20 (PHASE I) 1258 S. Waccamaw Drive PUBLIC ACCESS 20 (NOV. 2016) approximately 175 feet South to the next public The dunes at this location experienced erosion of sands up to two feet as observed from existing structures. Fence posts were observed at this stretch of beach and no remnants of other components were observed. The remaining posts are not reusable due to not being plumb and deterioration associated with age and exposure. BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 20. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 20. (MARCH 2017) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 20. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 20. (MARCH 2017)

33 PUBLIC ACCESS #21 (PHASE I) 1270 S. Waccamaw Drive PUBLIC ACCESS 21 (NOV. 2016) approximately 159 feet South to the next public The dunes at this location experienced erosion on the seaward side of the primary dunes, but did not result in measurable escarpments. Fence posts were observed at this stretch of beach and no remnants of other components were observed. The remaining posts are not reusable due to not being plumb and deterioration associated with age and exposure. BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 21. (MAY 2017) BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 21. (MAY 2017) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 21. (MAY 2017) PUBLIC ACCESS 21 (MAY 2017)

34 PUBLIC ACCESS #22 (PHASE I) 1286 S. Waccamaw Drive approximately 164 feet South to the next public The dunes at this location experienced erosion on the seaward side of the primary dunes, but did not result in measurable escarpments. Sand has since been pushed back up towards the dunes in some locations following Matthew. PUBLIC ACCESS 22 (NOV. 2016) No remnants of sand fencing were observed at this stretch of beach during assessments following beach nourishment efforts. BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 22. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 22. (MAY 2017) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 22. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 22. (MAY 2017)

35 PUBLIC ACCESS #23 (PHASE I) 1300 S. Waccamaw Drive approximately 168 feet South to the next public The dunes at this location experienced erosion on the seaward side of the primary dunes, but did not result in measurable escarpments. Sand has since been pushed back up towards the dunes following Matthew. PUBLIC ACCESS 23 SAND PUSHED UP FROM BEACH LINE (NOV. 2016) Two fence assemblies and multiple fence posts were observed at this stretch of beach and no remnants of other components were observed. A portion of one fence assembly has been lost or removed since the November assessments. The remaining posts are not reusable due to not being plumb and deterioration associated with age and exposure. BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 23. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 23. (MAY 2017) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 23. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 23. (MAY 2017)

36 PUBLIC ACCESS #24 (PHASE I) 1314 S. Waccamaw Drive approximately 143 feet South to the next public The dunes at this location experienced erosion on the seaward side of the primary dunes, but did not result in measurable escarpments. Sand has since been pushed back up towards the dunes following Matthew. PUBLIC ACCESS 24 (NOV. 2016) A dozen fence posts were observed at this stretch of beach and no remnants of other components were observed. The remaining posts are not reusable due to not being plumb and deterioration associated with age and exposure. BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 24. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 24. (MAY 2017) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 24. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 24. (MAY 2017)

37 PUBLIC ACCESS #25 (PHASE II) 1330 S. Waccamaw Drive PUBLIC ACCESS 25 FROM BEACH (NOV. 2016) approximately 159 feet South to the next public The dunes at this location experienced erosion on the seaward side of the primary dunes, but did not result in measurable escarpments. Four fence assemblies and a few fence posts were observed at this stretch of beach and no remnants of other components were observed. The four fence assemblies appear to have been installed post-matthew based on their state. BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 25. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 25. (MAY 2017) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 25. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 25. (MAY 2017)

38 PUBLIC ACCESS #26 (PHASE II) 1348 S. Waccamaw Drive Public access 26 marks the termination of beach nourishment activities by Georgetown County. approximately 162 feet South to the next public The dunes at this location experienced erosion on the seaward side of the primary dunes, but did not result in measurable escarpments. PUBLIC ACCESS 26 (NOV. 2016) No remnants of sand fencing were observed at this stretch of beach during assessments following beach nourishment efforts. BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 26. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 26. (MAY 2017) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 26. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 26. (MAY 2017)

39 PUBLIC ACCESS #27 (PHASE II) 1360 S. Waccamaw Drive approximately 159 feet South to the next public The dunes at this location experienced erosion on the seaward side of the primary dunes, but did not result in measurable escarpments. No remnants of sand fencing were observed at this stretch of beach during assessments following beach nourishment efforts. PUBLIC ACCESS 27 (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 27. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 27. (MAY 2017) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 27. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 27. (MAY 2017)

40 PUBLIC ACCESS #28 (PHASE II) 1376 S. Waccamaw Drive approximately 157 feet South to the next public The dunes at this location experienced erosion on the seaward side of the primary dunes, but did not result in measurable escarpments. No remnants of sand fencing were observed at this stretch of beach during assessments following beach nourishment efforts. PUBLIC ACCESS 28 (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 28. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 28. (MAY 2017) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 28. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 28. (MAY 2017)

41 PUBLIC ACCESS #29 (PHASE II) 1392 S. Waccamaw Drive approximately 164 feet South to the next public The dunes at this location experienced erosion on the seaward side of the primary dunes resulting in up to 2-0 escarpments at some locations on the dunes. No remnants of sand fencing were observed at this stretch of beach during assessments following beach nourishment efforts. PUBLIC ACCESS 29 (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 29. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 29. (MAY 2017) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 29. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 29. (MAY 2017)

42 PUBLIC ACCESS #30 (PHASE II) 1404 S. Waccamaw Drive approximately 140 feet South to the next public The dunes at this location experienced erosion on the seaward side of the primary dunes, but did not result in measurable escarpments. No remnants of sand fencing were observed at this stretch of beach during assessments following beach nourishment efforts. PUBLIC ACCESS 30 (MAY 2017) BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 30. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 30. (MAY 2017) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 30. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 30. (MAY 2017)

43 PUBLIC ACCESS #31 (PHASE II) 1423 S. Waccamaw Drive PUBLIC ACCESS 31 W/ VISIBLE SAND BEACHSIDE STAIRS (NOV. 2016) approximately 174 feet South to the next public The dunes at this location experienced erosion on the seaward side of the primary dunes, but did not result in measurable escarpments. No remnants of sand fencing were observed at this stretch of beach during assessments following beach nourishment efforts. BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 31. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 31. (MAY 2017) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 31. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 31. (MAY 2017)

44 PUBLIC ACCESS #32 (PHASE II) 1437 S. Waccamaw Drive approximately 148 feet South to the next public The dunes at this location experienced erosion on the seaward side of the primary dunes, but did not result in measurable escarpments. No remnants of sand fencing were observed at this stretch of beach during assessments following beach nourishment efforts. PUBLIC ACCESS 32 (MAY 2017) BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 32. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 32. (MAY 2017) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 32. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 32. (MAY 2017)

45 PUBLIC ACCESS #33 (PHASE II) 1449 S. Waccamaw Drive approximately 162 feet South to the next public The dunes at this location experienced erosion on the seaward side of the primary dunes resulting in up to 3-0 escarpments at the dunes. No remnants of sand fencing were observed at this stretch of beach during assessments following beach nourishment efforts. PUBLIC ACCESS 33 & OBSERVABLE PRIMARY DUNE EROSION (NOV 2016) BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 33. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 33. (MAY 2017) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 33. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 33. (MAY 2017)

46 PUBLIC ACCESS #34 (PHASE II) 1465 S. Waccamaw Drive approximately 292 feet South to the next public The dunes at this location experienced erosion on the seaward side of the primary dunes, resulting in few locations of up to 1-0 escarpment. No remnants of sand fencing were observed at this stretch of beach during assessments following beach nourishment efforts. PUBLIC ACCESS 34 (MAY 2017) BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 34. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 34. (MAY 2017) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 34. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 34. (MAY 2017)

47 PUBLIC ACCESS #35 (PHASE II) 1503 S. Waccamaw Drive approximately 161 feet South to the next public The dunes at this location experienced erosion on the seaward side of the primary dunes, but did not result in measurable escarpments. No remnants of sand fencing were observed at this stretch of beach during assessments following beach nourishment efforts. PUBLIC ACCESS 35 (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 35. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 35. (MAY 2017) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 35. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 35. (MAY 2017)

48 PUBLIC ACCESS #36 (PHASE II) 1512 S. Waccamaw Drive approximately 155 feet South to the next public The dunes at this location experienced erosion on the seaward side of the primary dunes, but did not result in measurable escarpments. No remnants of sand fencing were observed at this stretch of beach during assessments following beach nourishment efforts. PUBLIC ACCESS 36 (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 36. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 36. (MAY 2017) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 36. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 36. (MAY 2017)

49 PUBLIC ACCESS #37 (PHASE II) 1529 S. Waccamaw Drive approximately 1,555 feet South to the next public The dunes at this location experienced erosion on the seaward side of the primary dunes and began to show escarpment along the dunes. The dunes also began to lessen in width approaching Public Access 38. PUBLIC ACCESS 38 (NOV. 2016) No remnants of sand fencing were observed at this stretch of beach during assessments following beach nourishment efforts. BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 37. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 37. (MAY 2017) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 37. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 37. (MAY 2017)

50 PUBLIC ACCESS #38 (PHASE II) 1699 S. Waccamaw Drive approximately 379 feet South to the next public The dunes at this location were observed to be shorter in width than those observed between PA s 21 thru 37. The observed dunes experienced erosion on the seaward side of the primary dunes resulting in up to 4-0 escarpments at the dunes. PUBLIC ACCESS 38 W/ LARGE AMOUNT OF EROSION TO PRIMARY DUNES (NOV 2016) No remnants of sand fencing were observed at this stretch of beach during assessments following beach nourishment efforts. BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 38. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 38. (MAY 2017) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 38. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 38. (MAY 2017)

51 PUBLIC ACCESS #39 (PHASE II) 1734 S. Waccamaw Drive approximately 373 feet South to the next public The dunes at this location experienced erosion on the seaward side of the primary dunes resulting in up to 3-0 escarpments at the dunes. No remnants of sand fencing were observed at this stretch of beach during assessments following beach nourishment efforts. PUBLIC ACCESS 39 W/ EROSION OF THE PRIMARY DUNES (NOV 2016) BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 39. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 39. (MAY 2017) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 39. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 39. (MAY 2017)

52 PUBLIC ACCESS #40 (PHASE II) 1774 S. Waccamaw Drive approximately 513 feet South to the next public There were no dunes observed at this location during the November assessments. No remnants of sand fencing were observed at this stretch of beach during assessments following beach nourishment efforts. PUBLIC ACCESS 40 (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 40. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 40. (MAY 2017) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 40. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 40. (MAY 2017)

53 PUBLIC ACCESS #41 (PHASE II) 1815 S. Waccamaw Drive approximately 751 feet South to the next public There were no dunes observed at this location during the November assessments. No remnants of sand fencing were observed at this stretch of beach during assessments following beach nourishment efforts. PUBLIC ACCESS 41 AT FOOT OF WALKOVER (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 41. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 41. (MAY 2017) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 41. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 41. (MAY 2017)

54 PUBLIC ACCESS #42 (PHASE II) 1893 S. Waccamaw Drive approximately 517 feet South to the next public There were no dunes observed at this location during the November assessments. No remnants of sand fencing were observed at this stretch of beach during assessments following beach nourishment efforts. PUBLIC ACCESS 42 DESTROYED DURING STORME SURGE (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 42. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 42. (MAY 2017) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 42. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 42. (MAY 2017)

55 PUBLIC ACCESS #43 (PHASE II) 1945 S. Waccamaw Drive approximately 792 feet South to the next public There were no observed dunes at this location during the November assessments. A seawall present at this location was observed to have a six foot drop to the beach. Nourishment of the beaches has filled this location to create a level ground. ELEVATION PUBLIC ACCESS 43 & SEAWALL (NOV. 2016) No remnants of sand fencing were observed at this stretch of beach during assessments following beach nourishment efforts. BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 43. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 43. (MAY 2017) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 43. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 43. (MAY 2017)

56 PUBLIC ACCESS #44 (PHASE II) 2019 S. Waccamaw Drive The beach observed at this location consisted of approximately 100 feet to the South of Public Access 44. The beach beyond this observed stretch is located in front of a private community and composes Phase III of this Scope of Work. There were no observed dunes at this location during the November assessments. A large amount of rubble (rip rap and miscellaneous materials) was observed at the foot of Public Access 44 during November assessment. PUBLIC ACCESS 44 (NOV. 2016) No remnants of sand fencing were observed at this stretch of beach during assessments following beach nourishment efforts. BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 44. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 44. (MAY 2017) SEAWALL TO THE SOUTH OF PA 44. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 44. (MAY 2017)

57 PUBLIC ACCESS #45 (PHASE IV) 1232 Parker Drive PUBLIC ACCESS 45 W/ VISIBLE DUNE LINE (NOV. 2016) The beach observed at this location included 416 feet to the north of PA 45 to the southern lot line of Huntington Beach State Park and spanned approximately 494 feet South to the next public The dunes at this location experienced erosion on the seaward side of the primary dunes resulting in up to 4-0 escarpments at the dunes. No remnants of sand fencing were observed at this stretch of beach. BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 45. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 45. (MAY 2017) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 45. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 45. (MAY 2017)

58 PUBLIC ACCESS #46 (PHASE IV) 1138 Parker Drive approximately 435 feet South to the next public The dunes at this location experienced erosion on the seaward side of the primary dunes resulting in up to 5-0 escarpments at the dunes. No remnants of sand fencing were observed at this stretch of beach. PUBLIC ACCESS 46 W/ VISIBLE DUNE EROSION (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 46. (NOV. 2016) DUNES TO THE NORTH OF PA 46. (MAY 2017) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 46. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 46. (MAY 2017)

59 PUBLIC ACCESS #47 (PHASE IV) 1058 Parker Drive approximately 431 feet South to the next public The dunes at this location experienced erosion on the seaward side of the primary dunes resulting in up to 5-0 escarpments at the dunes. No remnants of sand fencing were observed at this stretch of beach. PUBLIC ACCESS 47 (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 47. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 47. (MAY 2017) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 47. (NOV. 2016) DUNE TO THE SOUTH OF PA 47. (MAY 2017)

60 PUBLIC ACCESS #48 (PHASE IV) 973 Parker Drive approximately 645 feet South to the next public The dunes at this location experienced erosion on the seaward side of the primary dunes resulting in up to 5-0 escarpments at the dunes. No remnants of sand fencing were observed at this stretch of beach. DUNE ADJACENT TO PUBLIC ACCESS 48 TO THE SOUTH (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 48. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 48. (MAY 2017) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 48. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 48. (MAY 2017)

61 PUBLIC ACCESS #49 (PHASE IV) 165 Seaview Loop approximately 362 feet South to the next public The dunes at this location experienced erosion on the seaward side of the primary dunes resulting in up to 5-0 escarpments at the dunes. A few fence posts were observed at this stretch of beach and no remnants of other components were observed. PUBLIC ACCESS 49 (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 49. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 49. (MAY 2017) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 49. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 49. (MAY 2017)

62 PUBLIC ACCESS #50 (PHASE IV) 108 Seaview Loop approximately 402 feet South to the next public The dunes at this location experienced erosion on the seaward side of the primary dunes resulting in up to 5-0 escarpments at the dunes. A few scattered fence posts were observed at this stretch of beach and no remnants of other components were observed. PUBLIC ACCESS 50 (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 50. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 50. (MAY 2017) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 50. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 50. (MAY 2017)

63 PUBLIC ACCESS #51 (PHASE IV) 36 Seaview Loop approximately 412 feet South to the next public The dunes at this location experienced erosion on the seaward side of the primary dunes resulting in up to 5-0 escarpments at the dunes. No remnants of sand fencing were observed at this stretch of beach. PUBLIC ACCESS 51 (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 51. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 51. (MAY 2017) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 51. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 51. (MAY 2017)

64 PUBLIC ACCESS #52 (PHASE IV) 619 Parker Drive approximately 343 feet South to the next public The dunes at this location experienced erosion on the seaward side of the primary dunes resulting in up to 4-0 escarpments at the dunes. No remnants of sand fencing were observed at this stretch of beach. PUBLIC ACCESS 52 (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 52. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 52. (MAY 2017) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 52. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 52. (MAY 2017)

65 PUBLIC ACCESS #53 (PHASE IV) 538 Parker Drive approximately 495 feet South to the next public The dunes at this location experienced erosion on the seaward side of the primary dunes resulting in up to 4-0 escarpments at the dunes. No remnants of sand fencing were observed at this stretch of beach. PUBLIC ACCESS 53 (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 53. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 53. (MAY 2017) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 53. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 53. (MAY 2017)

66 PUBLIC ACCESS #54 (PHASE IV) 464 Parker Drive approximately 603 feet South to the next public The dunes at this location experienced erosion on the seaward side of the primary dunes resulting in up to 4-0 escarpments at the dunes. No remnants of sand fencing were observed at this stretch of beach. PUBLIC ACCESS 54 W/ DUNE STARTING LOCATION OF DAMAGE (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 54. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 54. (APR. 2017) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 54. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 54. (APR. 2017)

67 PUBLIC ACCESS #55 (PHASE IV) 32 Shorebird Loop approximately 200 feet South to the next public The dunes at this location experienced erosion on the seaward side of the primary dunes resulting in up to 5-0 escarpments at the dunes. No remnants of sand fencing were observed at this stretch of beach. PUBLIC ACCESS 57 W/ OBSERVABLE DUNE LOSS (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 55. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 55. (MAY 2017) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 55. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 55. (MAY 2017)

68 PUBLIC ACCESS #56 (PHASE IV) 309 Parker Drive (Songbird Lane) approximately 397 feet South to the next public The dunes at this location experienced erosion on the seaward side of the primary dunes resulting in up to 5-0 escarpments at the dunes. No remnants of sand fencing were observed at this stretch of beach. PUBLIC ACCESS 56 W/ OBSERVABLE DUNE EROSION (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 56. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 56. (MAY 2017) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 56. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 56. (MAY 2017)

69 PUBLIC ACCESS #57 (PHASE IV) Media Lane approximately 401 feet South to the next public The dunes at this location experienced erosion on the seaward side of the primary dunes resulting in up to 5-0 escarpments at the dunes. No remnants of sand fencing were observed at this stretch of beach. PUBLIC ACCESS 57 (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 57. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 57. (MAY 2017) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 57. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 57. (MAY 2017)

70 PUBLIC ACCESS #58 (PHASE IV) 159 Parker Drive (Summertime Lane) approximately 567 feet South to the next public The dunes at this location experienced erosion on the seaward side of the primary dunes resulting in up to 5-0 escarpments at the dunes. No remnants of sand fencing were observed at this stretch of beach. PUBLIC ACCESS 58 (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 58. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 58. (MAY 2017) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 58. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 58. (MAY 2017)

71 PUBLIC ACCESS #59 (PHASE IV) 25 Parker Drive (Loggerhead Lane) The beach observed at this location consisted of approximately 100 feet to the South of Public Access 59. The beach beyond this observed stretch is located in front of the Litchfield by the Sea community and is covered in Phase V for estimated quantities of sand fencing installation. The dunes at this location experienced erosion on the seaward side of the primary dunes resulting in up to 5-0 escarpments at the dunes. PUBLIC ACCESS 59 FACING EAST TOWARDS OCEAN (NOV. 2016) A couple fence posts were observed at this stretch of beach and no remnants of other components were observed. BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 59. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 59. (MAY 2017) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 59. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 59. (MAY 2017)

72 PUBLIC ACCESS #60 (PHASE VI) 157 Norris Drive (Litchfield Inn) approximately 241 feet South to the next public The beach North of this access has newly constructed sand fencing installed by Litchfield Inn and is considered in estimated quantities for Phase V. The dunes at this location experienced erosion on the seaward side of the primary dunes resulting in up to 4-0 escarpments at the dunes. PUBLIC ACCESS 60 LITCHFIELD INN (NOV. 2016) A few scattered fence posts were observed at this stretch of beach and no remnants of other components were observed. BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 60. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 60. (APR. 2017) DUEN TO THE SOUTH OF PA 60. (APR. 2017) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 60. (APR.2017)

73 PUBLIC ACCESS #61 (PHASE VI) 216 Norris Drive approximately 349 feet South to the next public The dunes at this location experienced erosion on the seaward side of the primary dunes resulting in up to 4-0 escarpments at the dunes. No remnants of sand fencing were observed at this stretch of beach. PUBLIC ACCESS 61 (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 61. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 61. (APR. 2017) DUNES AT PA 61. (APR. 2017) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 61. (APR.2017)

74 PUBLIC ACCESS #62 (PHASE VI) 260 Norris Drive approximately 428 feet South to the next public The dunes at this location experienced erosion on the seaward side of the primary dunes resulting in up to 4-0 escarpments at the dunes. PUBLIC ACCESS 62 (NOV. 2016) No remnants of sand fencing were observed at this stretch of beach during the November assessments. However, approximately 160 feet of new fencing was installed recently, but does not meet the details set forth by the OCRM Sand Fencing guidelines (See details included within Appendix). BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 62. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 62. (APR.2017) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 62. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 62. (APR.2017)

75 PUBLIC ACCESS #63 (PHASE VI) 344 Norris Drive approximately 361 feet South to the next public The dunes at this location experienced erosion on the seaward side of the primary dunes resulting in up to 4-0 escarpments at the dunes. No remnants of sand fencing were observed at this stretch of beach. PUBLIC ACCESS 63 (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 63. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 63. (APR.2017) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 63. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 63. (APR.2017)

76 PUBLIC ACCESS #64 (PHASE VI) 420 Norris Drive approximately 418 feet South to the next public The dunes at this location experienced erosion on the seaward side of the primary dunes resulting in up to 4-0 escarpments at the dunes. No remnants of sand fencing were observed at this stretch of beach. PUBLIC ACCESS 64 (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 64. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 64. (APR.2017) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 64. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 64. (APR.2017)

77 PUBLIC ACCESS #65 (PHASE VI) 497 Norris Drive approximately 261 feet South to the next public The dunes at this location experienced erosion on the seaward side of the primary dunes resulting in up to 4-0 escarpments at the dunes. No remnants of sand fencing were observed at this stretch of beach. PUBLIC ACCESS 65 (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 65. (NOV. 2016) PUBLIC ACCESS 65. (MARCH 2017) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 65. (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE SOUTH BETWEEN PA 66 & 65 LOOKING NORTH. (APR.2017)

78 PUBLIC ACCESS #66 (PHASE VI) 545 Norris Drive PUBLIC ACCESS 66 FRONT VIEW (NOV. 2016) The beach observed at this location consisted of approximately 100 feet to the South of Public Access 66. The beach beyond this observed stretch is located in front of the Inlet Point community included within Phase VII estimated quantities for sand fencing installation. The dunes at this location experienced erosion on the seaward side of the primary dunes resulting in up to 4-0 escarpments at the dunes. No remnants of sand fencing were observed at this stretch of beach. PA 66 NORTH SIDE VIEW (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE NORTH OF PA 66. (APR.2017) PA 66 NORTH SIDE VIEW (NOV. 2016) BEACH TO THE SOUTH OF PA 66. (APR.2017)

2011 Nags Head Beach Nourishment Project Update. Tim Kana & Haiqing Kaczkowski

2011 Nags Head Beach Nourishment Project Update. Tim Kana & Haiqing Kaczkowski 2011 Nags Head Beach Nourishment Project Update Tim Kana & Haiqing Kaczkowski NCBIWA Conference 3 April 2017 Outline of the Presentation 1 Review 2011 Nourishment Project Post-project monitoring efforts

More information

The Galveston Seawall

The Galveston Seawall Coastal and Ocean Engineering ENGI.8751 Undergraduate Student Forum Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science, Memorial University, St. John s, NL, Canada. March, 2013 The Galveston Seawall Mark Harvey

More information

City of Fort Lauderdale. Frequently Asked Questions. Proposed Sea Wall Ordinance

City of Fort Lauderdale. Frequently Asked Questions. Proposed Sea Wall Ordinance City of Fort Lauderdale Frequently Asked Questions Proposed Sea Wall Ordinance The City of Fort Lauderdale is considering amending the Unified Land Development Regulations of the City of Fort Lauderdale

More information

October 7, 2016 Hurricane Matthew Rakes the East Coast of Flagler County for 18.1 Miles

October 7, 2016 Hurricane Matthew Rakes the East Coast of Flagler County for 18.1 Miles October 7, 2016 Hurricane Matthew Rakes the East Coast of Flagler County for 18.1 Miles Hammock Dunes Suffers Penetration of the Ocean into the Community; has a 15-30 ft. Wide Triangular Section of the

More information

Appendix B Ultimate Airport Capacity and Delay Simulation Modeling Analysis

Appendix B Ultimate Airport Capacity and Delay Simulation Modeling Analysis Appendix B ULTIMATE AIRPORT CAPACITY & DELAY SIMULATION MODELING ANALYSIS B TABLE OF CONTENTS EXHIBITS TABLES B.1 Introduction... 1 B.2 Simulation Modeling Assumption and Methodology... 4 B.2.1 Runway

More information

Edisto Beach Renourishment and Groin Lengthening Project. Tim Kana Coastal Science & Engineering

Edisto Beach Renourishment and Groin Lengthening Project. Tim Kana Coastal Science & Engineering Edisto Beach Renourishment and Groin Lengthening Project Tim Kana Coastal Science & Engineering Hurricane Matthew 8 Oct 2016 Cat 1 Storm @ Edisto Beach Worst Surge Event Since DAVID in 1979 Tides ~ 5 ft

More information

Guide to Siting of Seawalls January 13, 2014 by Michael Walther, P.E., D.CE, President - Coastal Tech

Guide to Siting of Seawalls January 13, 2014 by Michael Walther, P.E., D.CE, President - Coastal Tech January 13, 2014 by Michael Walther, P.E., D.CE, President - Coastal Tech mwalther@coastaltechcorp.com Prepared for the Sea Turtle Conservancy http://www.conserveturtles.org/ Introduction Overview: This

More information

Addendum - Airport Development Alternatives (Chapter 6)

Addendum - Airport Development Alternatives (Chapter 6) Bowers Field Addendum - Airport Development Alternatives (Chapter 6) This addendum to the Airport Development Alternatives chapter includes the preferred airside development alternative and the preliminary

More information

March 2, The Honorable Mayor Williams D. Sessoms, Jr. Members of City Council. Subject: Coastal CIP Presentation to City Council - March 6, 2018

March 2, The Honorable Mayor Williams D. Sessoms, Jr. Members of City Council. Subject: Coastal CIP Presentation to City Council - March 6, 2018 OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER (757) 385-4242 (757) 427-5626 FAX MUNICIPAL CENTER BUILDING 1, ROOM 234 2401 COURTHOUSE DRIVE VIRGINIA BEACH, VA 23456-9001 March 2, 2018 The Honorable Mayor Williams D. Sessoms,

More information

THRESHOLD GUIDELINES FOR AVALANCHE SAFETY MEASURES

THRESHOLD GUIDELINES FOR AVALANCHE SAFETY MEASURES BRITISH COLUMBIA MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION & INFRASTRUCTURE AVALANCHE & WEATHER PROGRAMS THRESHOLD GUIDELINES FOR AVALANCHE SAFETY MEASURES British Columbia Ministry of Transportation & Infrastructure

More information

Coastal Impact on barrier Islands: Application to Praia de Faro

Coastal Impact on barrier Islands: Application to Praia de Faro Coastal Impact on barrier Islands: Application to Praia de Faro Theocharis Plomaritis, Oscar Ferreira and Susana Costas RISCKIT Final Meeting This project has received funding from the European Union s

More information

A Brief History of the Town of Palm Beach Coastal Protection Program. Beach nourishment occurred in Palm Beach as far back as the 1940s.

A Brief History of the Town of Palm Beach Coastal Protection Program. Beach nourishment occurred in Palm Beach as far back as the 1940s. A Brief History of the Town of Palm Beach Coastal Protection Program Beach nourishment occurred in Palm Beach as far back as the 1940s. The Lake Worth Inlet Sand Transfer Plant was built in the late 1950s.

More information

Beaver Creek Provincial Park. Management Plan

Beaver Creek Provincial Park. Management Plan Beaver Creek Provincial Park Management Plan 2 Beaver Creek Provincial Park Table of Contents 1. Introduction... 3 2. Park History... 3 3. Park Attributes... 4 3.1 Natural... 4 3.2 Recreational... 4 4.

More information

Preliminary Findings of Proposed Alternative

Preliminary Findings of Proposed Alternative Preliminary Findings of Proposed Alternative The attached drawing provides a schematic layout of the proposed alternative that will be discussed on July 27, 2010. A full report will follow and should be

More information

[Docket No. FAA ; Product Identifier 2016-SW-080-AD] Airworthiness Directives; Air Comm Corporation Air Conditioning Systems

[Docket No. FAA ; Product Identifier 2016-SW-080-AD] Airworthiness Directives; Air Comm Corporation Air Conditioning Systems This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 01/11/2018 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2018-00177, and on FDsys.gov [4910-13-P] DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

More information

Coastal Management: Treasure Island - Long Key Nourishment

Coastal Management: Treasure Island - Long Key Nourishment Coastal Management: Treasure Island - Long Key Nourishment Project Completed - October 20, 2010 The nourishment of Treasure Island and Long Key (TI/LK) beaches began in late July of 2010. The previous

More information

[Docket No. FAA ; Product Identifier 2016-SW-080-AD; Amendment ; AD ]

[Docket No. FAA ; Product Identifier 2016-SW-080-AD; Amendment ; AD ] [Federal Register Volume 83, Number 241 (Monday, December 17, 2018)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 64435-64437] From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov] [FR

More information

The offers operators increased capacity while taking advantage of existing airport infrastructure. aero quarterly qtr_03 10

The offers operators increased capacity while taking advantage of existing airport infrastructure. aero quarterly qtr_03 10 The 747 8 offers operators increased capacity while taking advantage of existing airport infrastructure. 14 aero quarterly qtr_03 10 Operating the 747 8 at Existing Airports Today s major airports are

More information

STAFF REPORT. Airport Land Use Plan Consistency Review: Santa Barbara Airport Master Plan. MEETING DATE: November 19, 2015 AGENDA ITEM: 7D

STAFF REPORT. Airport Land Use Plan Consistency Review: Santa Barbara Airport Master Plan. MEETING DATE: November 19, 2015 AGENDA ITEM: 7D STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: Airport Land Use Plan Consistency Review: Santa Barbara Airport Master Plan MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: 7D STAFF CONTACT: Peter Imhof, Andrew Orfila RECOMMENDATION: Adopt findings

More information

Impact of Offshore Directed Forcing on Sediment Transport and Structural Integrity at Packery Channel, Corpus Christi Texas

Impact of Offshore Directed Forcing on Sediment Transport and Structural Integrity at Packery Channel, Corpus Christi Texas Google Earth 29 Aug 2017 Impact of Offshore Directed Forcing on Sediment Transport and Structural Integrity at Packery Channel, Corpus Christi Texas Deidre D. Williams Coastal Research Scientist Conrad

More information

United States Department of the Interior National Park Service. Boundary Expansion Listed in National Register January 11, 2017

United States Department of the Interior National Park Service. Boundary Expansion Listed in National Register January 11, 2017 NPS Form 10900-a (Rev. 8/2002) OMB No. 10240018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service Boundary Expansion Listed in National Register January 11, 2017 National Register of Historic

More information

City of Durango 5.8 FUNDING TRAILS DEVELOPMENT

City of Durango 5.8 FUNDING TRAILS DEVELOPMENT 5.8 FUNDING TRAILS DEVELOPMENT The City has been successful in establishing dedicated local funding sources as well as applying for grants to develop the City s trail system, having received nearly $2.4

More information

[Docket No. FAA ; Product Identifier 2016-SW-077-AD] Airworthiness Directives; Scotts-Bell 47 Inc. (Type Certificate Previously Held by

[Docket No. FAA ; Product Identifier 2016-SW-077-AD] Airworthiness Directives; Scotts-Bell 47 Inc. (Type Certificate Previously Held by This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 05/18/2018 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2018-10585, and on FDsys.gov [4910-13-P] DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

More information

Railway-Highway Crossing at Grade Regulations: Guidelines for British Columbia s Provincial Heritage Railways

Railway-Highway Crossing at Grade Regulations: Guidelines for British Columbia s Provincial Heritage Railways Railway-Highway Crossing at Grade Regulations: Guidelines for British Columbia s Provincial Heritage Railways SHORT TITLE 1. These Guidelines may be cited as the Railway-Highway Crossing at Grade Guidelines.

More information

HYDRAULIC DESIGN OF THE TOURISTIC BERTHING IN ASWAN CITY

HYDRAULIC DESIGN OF THE TOURISTIC BERTHING IN ASWAN CITY HYDRAULIC DESIGN OF THE TOURISTIC BERTHING IN ASWAN CITY Dr. Hossam El-Sersawy Researcher, Nile Research Institute (NRI), National Water Research Center (NWRC), Egypt E-mail: h_sersawy@hotmail.com Dr.

More information

PURPOSE AND NEED (CONCURRENCE POINT 1) NEW CANADA ROAD PROJECT FROM STATE ROUTE 1 (U.S. HIGHWAY 70) TO U.S. INTERSTATE 40

PURPOSE AND NEED (CONCURRENCE POINT 1) NEW CANADA ROAD PROJECT FROM STATE ROUTE 1 (U.S. HIGHWAY 70) TO U.S. INTERSTATE 40 PURPOSE AND NEED (CONCURRENCE POINT 1) NEW CANADA ROAD PROJECT FROM STATE ROUTE 1 (U.S. HIGHWAY 70) TO U.S. INTERSTATE 40 Project Description The primary purpose of this project is to improve the major

More information

Merritt Island Airport

Merritt Island Airport TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION... 1-1 INTRODUCTION AND PROJECT OVERVIEW... 1-1 General Guidelines... 1-1 Prior Planning Documentation... 1-2 Key Issues... 1-2 Goals and Objectives... 1-2 Regulatory

More information

RIO VISTA MUNICIPAL AIRPORT

RIO VISTA MUNICIPAL AIRPORT DRAINAGE TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM RIO VISTA MUNICIPAL AIRPORT RIO VISTA, CALIFORNIA Prepared for: City of Rio Vista 1 Main Street Rio Vista, CA 94571 (707) 374-5337 Prepared by: August 2012 Copyright 2012

More information

Airport Master Plan Update

Airport Master Plan Update Duttchessss Countty Airrporrtt Masstterr Plan Updatte Airport Master Plan Update Final Report Dutchess County Airport Town of Wappingers, New York C&S Engineers, Inc. 499 Col. Eileen Collins Blvd. Syracuse,

More information

Runway Roughness Evaluation- Boeing Bump Methodology

Runway Roughness Evaluation- Boeing Bump Methodology FLIGHT SERVICES Runway Roughness Evaluation- Boeing Bump Methodology Michael Roginski, PE, Principal Engineer Boeing Airport Compatibility Engineering ALACPA X Seminar, Mexico City, Mexico September 30-

More information

Runway Roughness Evaluation- Boeing Bump Methodology

Runway Roughness Evaluation- Boeing Bump Methodology FLIGHT SERVICES Runway Roughness Evaluation- Boeing Bump Methodology Michael Roginski, PE, Principal Engineer Boeing Airport Compatibility Engineering ALACPA X Seminar, Mexico City, Mexico September 3-

More information

Section 106 Update Memo #1 Attachment D. Traffic Diversion & APE Expansion Methodology & Maps

Section 106 Update Memo #1 Attachment D. Traffic Diversion & APE Expansion Methodology & Maps Section 106 Update Memo #1 Attachment D Traffic Diversion & APE Expansion Methodology & Maps I-65/I-70 North Split Interchange Reconstruction Project (Des. Nos. 1592385 & 1600808) Traffic Diversion and

More information

[Docket No. FAA ; Product Identifier 2017-NM-098-AD; Amendment ; AD ]

[Docket No. FAA ; Product Identifier 2017-NM-098-AD; Amendment ; AD ] [Federal Register Volume 83, Number 158 (Wednesday, August 15, 2018)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 40443-40445] From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov] [FR

More information

CHAPTER III: TRAIL DESIGN STANDARDS, SPECIFICATIONS & PERMITS

CHAPTER III: TRAIL DESIGN STANDARDS, SPECIFICATIONS & PERMITS CHAPTER III Trail Design Standards, Specifications & Permits This chapter discusses trail standards, preferred surface types for different activities, permits, and other requirements one must consider

More information

ORDINANCE NO. C-16- WHEREAS, the proposed minimum seawall elevation exceeds the current maximum by 0.7 feet (8.4 inches); and

ORDINANCE NO. C-16- WHEREAS, the proposed minimum seawall elevation exceeds the current maximum by 0.7 feet (8.4 inches); and ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE UNIFIED LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS OF THE CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA, AMENDING SECTION 47-19.3, BOAT SLIPS, DOCKS, BOAT DAVITS, HOISTS AND SIMILAR MOORING

More information

Pump Stations...more than just pumps

Pump Stations...more than just pumps Task Force Hope Status Report Newsletter March 13, 2013 Pump Stations...more than just pumps Photo by Jerry Baggett Pump Station 11, Algiers Canal Repairs and Fronting Protection Repaired pump stations

More information

Mount Rainier National Park November 2006 Flood Damage

Mount Rainier National Park November 2006 Flood Damage On November 6 and 7, 2006, Mount Rainier National Park received 18 inches of rain in 36 hours. This presentation summarizes the extensive flood damage that occurred throughout the park. Updated November

More information

Beach Management Hayling Island. Marc Bryan - Coastal Engineer Havant, Portsmouth and Gosport Coastal Partnership

Beach Management Hayling Island. Marc Bryan - Coastal Engineer Havant, Portsmouth and Gosport Coastal Partnership Beach Management Hayling Island Marc Bryan - Coastal Engineer Havant, Portsmouth and Gosport Coastal Partnership Beach Management Hayling Island The Problem 1985 Beach Nourishment How we Recycle Historic

More information

Draft Concept Alternatives Analysis for the Inaugural Airport Program September 2005

Draft Concept Alternatives Analysis for the Inaugural Airport Program September 2005 Section 10 Preferred Inaugural Airport Concept 10.0 Introduction The Preferred Inaugural Airport Concept for SSA was developed by adding the preferred support/ancillary facilities selected in Section 9

More information

Alternative Highest & Best Use Analysis Boutique Hotel

Alternative Highest & Best Use Analysis Boutique Hotel Alternative Highest & Best Use Analysis In response to numerous comments received from the public, as well as issues raised by the CCC in the Appeal Staff Report Substantial Issue Determination, the following

More information

FUTENMA REPLACEMENT FACILITY BILATERAL EXPERTS STUDY GROUP REPORT. August 31, 2010

FUTENMA REPLACEMENT FACILITY BILATERAL EXPERTS STUDY GROUP REPORT. August 31, 2010 FUTENMA REPLACEMENT FACILITY BILATERAL EXPERTS STUDY GROUP REPORT August 31, 2010 MANDATE AND SCOPE OF WORK: In order to achieve the earliest possible relocation of Marine Corps Air Station Futenma, the

More information

URBAN DESIGN REPORT. Proposed Residential Development, Old Church Road, Caledon East

URBAN DESIGN REPORT. Proposed Residential Development, Old Church Road, Caledon East Proposed Residential Development, Old Church Road, Caledon East TABLE CONTENTS: 1.0 DEVELOPMENT 1.1 Introduction-Analysis of Guiding Principles and Documents 1.2 Community Design and Architectural Design

More information

Appendix. Gatwick Airport Ltd - Further information on Gatwick s revised phasing strategy (including Programme) Gatwick Airport Limited

Appendix. Gatwick Airport Ltd - Further information on Gatwick s revised phasing strategy (including Programme) Gatwick Airport Limited Gatwick Airport Limited Response to Airports Commission Consultation Appendix 37 Gatwick Airport Ltd - Further information on Gatwick s revised phasing strategy (including Programme) Further information

More information

Other Principle Arterials Minor Arterial Major Collector Minor Collector Local

Other Principle Arterials Minor Arterial Major Collector Minor Collector Local CHAPTER 10 TRANSPORTATION Introduction The system of public roads in East Pikeland Township is decidedly rural in character. Since the 1984, the road network has remained much the same, with the addition

More information

Alternatives. Introduction. Range of Alternatives

Alternatives. Introduction. Range of Alternatives Alternatives Introduction Federal environmental regulations concerning the environmental review process require that all reasonable alternatives, which might accomplish the objectives of a proposed project,

More information

Common Ground Drainage Channel Diversion. Design Report

Common Ground Drainage Channel Diversion. Design Report Common Ground Drainage Channel Diversion Design Report Resource Management International Inc Consulting Engineers May 2017 COMMON GROUND DRAINAGE CHANNEL DIVERSION PREPARED FOR: QUILL LAKES WATERSHED NO.

More information

National Association of Rocketry Level 3 High Power Certification Requirements

National Association of Rocketry Level 3 High Power Certification Requirements National Association of Rocketry Level 3 High Power Certification Requirements 1.0 Flyer Requirements 1.1 Any individual attempting NAR Level 3 Certification must be a Level 2 high power certified NAR

More information

Peace Project Water Use Plan

Peace Project Water Use Plan Peace Project Water Use Plan Williston Reservoir Trial Tributaries Implementation Year 5 Reference: GMSWORKS-19 6 Mile 2016 Engineering Inspection Report Study Period: 2016 KERR WOOD LEIDAL Site Inspection

More information

2012 Mat Su Valley Collision Avoidance Survey

2012 Mat Su Valley Collision Avoidance Survey Table of Contents Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION Measurement Objectives 3 Methodology and Notes 4 Key Findings 5 PILOT LOCATION Activity in the Area 7 Pilot Location 8 Altitudes Flown 9 SAFETY IN THE

More information

1. SUMMARY 2. ADDITIONAL PARTICIPATION

1. SUMMARY 2. ADDITIONAL PARTICIPATION 1. SUMMARY THE PURPOSE OF THIS MESSAGE IS PROVIDE AN UPDATE TO THE REFERENCE (A) MESSAGE CONCERNING THE FAA'S AGING TRANSPORT SYSTEMS PROGRAM.THIS MESSAGE ALSO INTRODUCES A NEW MEMBER TO THE FAA ADVISORY

More information

Section 3.6 Recreation

Section 3.6 Recreation 3.6 RECREATION This section evaluates the potential impacts of the proposed project on recreation within MTRP. The evaluation is based on field observations, a review of maps of MTRP and the MTRP Master

More information

Chapter Seven COST ESTIMATES AND FUNDING A. GENERAL

Chapter Seven COST ESTIMATES AND FUNDING A. GENERAL Chapter Seven COST ESTIMATES AND FUNDING A. GENERAL This chapter delineates the recommended 2005 2024 Sussex County Airport Capital Improvement Program (CIP). It further identifies probable construction

More information

WELCOME to the Iditarod Dog Sledding Historic District (IDSHD) Workshop. January 11, Houston Middle School Houston, Alaska

WELCOME to the Iditarod Dog Sledding Historic District (IDSHD) Workshop. January 11, Houston Middle School Houston, Alaska WELCOME to the Iditarod Dog Sledding Historic District (IDSHD) Workshop January 11, 2012 Houston Middle School Houston, Alaska Workshop Purpose: Present/discuss proposed resolutions to comments received

More information

2017/ Q1 Performance Measures Report

2017/ Q1 Performance Measures Report 2017/2018 - Q1 Performance Measures Report Contents Ridership & Revenue... 1 Historical Revenue & Ridership... 1 Revenue Actual vs. Planned... 3 Mean Distance Between Failures... 5 Maintenance Cost Quarter

More information

Original Report F WIN , F WIN Prepared for Northland Power and Ministry of Tourism and Culture

Original Report F WIN , F WIN Prepared for Northland Power and Ministry of Tourism and Culture STAGE 2 ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT McLEAN S MOUNTAIN WIND FARM Part Lots 12-15, Concession 3 Geographic Township of Howland Part Lot 24, Concession 12 Geographic Township of Bidwell and Goat Island (formerly

More information

THE BOEING COMPANY

THE BOEING COMPANY Page 1 2010-06-10 THE BOEING COMPANY Amendment 39-16234 Docket No. FAA-2008-0978; Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-014-AD PREAMBLE Effective Date (a) This airworthiness directive (AD) is effective May 3,

More information

Visual and Sensory Aspect

Visual and Sensory Aspect Updated All Wales LANDMAP Statistics 2017 Visual and Sensory Aspect Final Report for Natural Resources Wales February 2018 Tel: 029 2043 7841 Email: sw@whiteconsultants.co.uk Web: www.whiteconsultants.co.uk

More information

PULLMAN-MOSCOW REGIONAL AIRPORT Runway Realignment Project

PULLMAN-MOSCOW REGIONAL AIRPORT Runway Realignment Project PULLMAN-MOSCOW REGIONAL AIRPORT Runway Realignment Project GENERAL AIRPORT INFORMATION AIRPORT USERS Airport ownership: Public, owned by the Pullman-Moscow Regional Airport Board Year opened: February

More information

CAS Case Study: Mullion Harbour, adapting to a stormier future

CAS Case Study: Mullion Harbour, adapting to a stormier future t The National Trust Coastal Adaptation Strategy Case Study: Mullion Harbour Authors: Ed Bartlett, Alastair Cameron, Phil Dyke & Adrian Woodhall June 2010 CAS Case Study: Mullion Harbour, adapting to a

More information

[Docket No. FAA ; Product Identifier 2017-SW-004-AD] Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Helicopters Deutschland GmbH (Type Certificate

[Docket No. FAA ; Product Identifier 2017-SW-004-AD] Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Helicopters Deutschland GmbH (Type Certificate This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 11/03/2017 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2017-23201, and on FDsys.gov [4910-13-P] DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

More information

M7 AEROSPACE LP

M7 AEROSPACE LP Page 1 2009-11-06 M7 AEROSPACE LP Amendment 39-15916 Docket No. FAA-2009-0119; Directorate Identifier 2008-CE-068-AD PREAMBLE Effective Date (a) This AD becomes effective on July 2, 2009. Affected ADs

More information

25 th Avenue Grade Separation. December 13, 2017

25 th Avenue Grade Separation. December 13, 2017 25 th Avenue Grade Separation December 13, 2017 Agenda I. Overview II. III. IV. Project Description Project Benefits Project Construction V. Next Steps VI. Questions 2 Overview Project Location 4 E. 25

More information

REVISED DRAFT Integrated Hurricane Sandy General Reevaluation Report and Environmental Impact Statement. Atlantic Coast of New York

REVISED DRAFT Integrated Hurricane Sandy General Reevaluation Report and Environmental Impact Statement. Atlantic Coast of New York REVISED DRAFT Integrated Hurricane Sandy General Reevaluation Report and Environmental Impact Statement Atlantic Coast of New York East Rockaway Inlet to Rockaway Inlet and Jamaica Bay Appendix F Public

More information

Chapter 6. Airports Authority of India Manual of Air Traffic Services Part 1

Chapter 6. Airports Authority of India Manual of Air Traffic Services Part 1 Chapter 6 6.1 ESSENTIAL LOCAL TRAFFIC 6.1.1 Information on essential local traffic known to the controller shall be transmitted without delay to departing and arriving aircraft concerned. Note 1. Essential

More information

Runway Length Analysis Prescott Municipal Airport

Runway Length Analysis Prescott Municipal Airport APPENDIX 2 Runway Length Analysis Prescott Municipal Airport May 11, 2009 Version 2 (draft) Table of Contents Introduction... 1-1 Section 1 Purpose & Need... 1-2 Section 2 Design Standards...1-3 Section

More information

Stage 2 ION: Light Rail Transit (LRT) from Kitchener to Cambridge

Stage 2 ION: Light Rail Transit (LRT) from Kitchener to Cambridge Stage 2 ION: Light Rail Transit (LRT) from Kitchener to Cambridge Public Consultation Centre (PCC) No. 3 Please Sign-in Cambridge City Hall November 21, 2017 2:00 to 8:00pm Preston Memorial Auditorium

More information

CHAPTER 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

CHAPTER 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CHAPTER 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION William R. Fairchild International Airport (CLM) is located approximately three miles west of the city of Port Angeles, Washington. The airport

More information

FOUNDATIONS OF ARCHAEOLOGY A WALK IN VERNDITCH CHASE

FOUNDATIONS OF ARCHAEOLOGY A WALK IN VERNDITCH CHASE FOUNDATIONS OF ARCHAEOLOGY A WALK IN VERNDITCH CHASE 1. A Tale of two Long Barrows Long barrows were constructed as earthen or drystone mounds with flanking ditches and acted as funerary monuments during

More information

Updates to Procedures at St. John s International Airport

Updates to Procedures at St. John s International Airport October 10, 2017 Updates to Procedures at St. John s International Airport This document provides notice of upcoming changes to instrument procedures being implemented by NAV CANADA at the St. John s International

More information

SOUTH CAROLINA AERONAUTICS COMMISSION

SOUTH CAROLINA AERONAUTICS COMMISSION SOUTH CAROLINA AERONAUTICS COMMISSION STATEWIDE AIRFIELD PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM UPDATE AIRPORT: LEXINGTON COUNTY AT PELION 106 AIRPORT ROAD PELION, SC 29123 SOUTH CAROLINA AERONAUTICS COMMISSION 2553

More information

[Docket No. FAA ; Directorate Identifier 2016-CE-026-AD; Amendment. AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

[Docket No. FAA ; Directorate Identifier 2016-CE-026-AD; Amendment. AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 05/25/2017 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2017-10407, and on FDsys.gov [4910-13-P] DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

More information

Archaeology 1:25,000. Map 4. Previously known site. Site found by this survey (pale symbol means described on previous map)

Archaeology 1:25,000. Map 4. Previously known site. Site found by this survey (pale symbol means described on previous map) Archaeology 1:25,000 Map 4 148 18 17 13 12 16 15 14 147 11 149 Crown copyright. All rights reserved. Historic Scotland Licence No. 100017509 [2009] 150 0 0.5 1 Km Previously known site Site found by this

More information

HAMPTON ROADS CROSSINGS PATRIOTS CROSSING AND HRBT

HAMPTON ROADS CROSSINGS PATRIOTS CROSSING AND HRBT HRTPO Board Meeting March 21, 2013 Agenda ITEM #9: HAMPTON ROADS CROSSINGS PATRIOTS CROSSING AND HRBT Congestion at the Hampton Roads Bridge-Tunnel (HRBT) on I-64 has long been identified as a problem

More information

ANNUAL REPORT DALLAS LOVE FIELD AIRPORT. April 23, 2008

ANNUAL REPORT DALLAS LOVE FIELD AIRPORT. April 23, 2008 ANNUAL REPORT DALLAS LOVE FIELD AIRPORT April 23, 2008 I. INTRODUCTION On August 14, 2006, the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) signed and published the final version of the Texas Pollutant

More information

Request for Proposal National Tropical Botanical Garden Lower Limahuli Preserve Emergency Stream Debris Removal

Request for Proposal National Tropical Botanical Garden Lower Limahuli Preserve Emergency Stream Debris Removal Request for Proposal National Tropical Botanical Garden Lower Limahuli Preserve Emergency Stream Debris Removal I. Summary of Work Bids are solicited for the emergency removal of debris deposited in the

More information

Bear Creek Habitat Improvement Project

Bear Creek Habitat Improvement Project 06/10/10 Bear Creek Habitat Improvement Project El Paso County, Colorado Pike National Forest and Colorado Springs Utilities Owned Land Report prepared by: Eric Billmeyer Executive Director Rocky Mountain

More information

[Docket No. FAA ; Product Identifier 2018-SW-041-AD; Amendment ; AD ]

[Docket No. FAA ; Product Identifier 2018-SW-041-AD; Amendment ; AD ] [Federal Register Volume 83, Number 175 (Monday, September 10, 2018)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 45545-45548] From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov] [FR

More information

Rule Governing the Designation and Establishment of All-Terrain Vehicle Use Trails on State Land

Rule Governing the Designation and Establishment of All-Terrain Vehicle Use Trails on State Land Rule Governing the Designation and Establishment of All-Terrain Vehicle Use Trails on State Land 1.0 Authority 1.1 This rule is promulgated pursuant to 23 V.S.A. 3506. Section 3506 (b)(4) states that an

More information

Clam Harbour Provincial Park

Clam Harbour Provincial Park Clam Harbour Provincial Park Public Engagement Session Thursday, September 14 th, 2017 5:30pm 7:30pm Webbers Store 11470 Nova Scotia Trunk 7 Lake Charlotte, NS Agenda Overview of the Provincial Parks System

More information

HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY BENCHMARKS IN GOOGLE EARTH

HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY BENCHMARKS IN GOOGLE EARTH HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY BENCHMARKS IN GOOGLE EARTH By Thomas G. Davis 1, PhD, PE, PLS; L. Scott Brown 2, PLS; and Rollins Turner 3, PhD INTRODUCTION HCBM (http://www.metzgerwillard.us/hcbm/) is a web-based

More information

Bradley Brook Relocation Project. Scoping Notice. Saco Ranger District. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service

Bradley Brook Relocation Project. Scoping Notice. Saco Ranger District. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Bradley Brook Relocation Project United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Scoping Notice White Mountain National Forest February 2011 For Information Contact: Jenny Burnett White Mountain

More information

[Docket No. FAA ; Directorate Identifier 2004-CE-24-AD; Amendment ; AD ]

[Docket No. FAA ; Directorate Identifier 2004-CE-24-AD; Amendment ; AD ] [Federal Register: December 16, 2004 (Volume 69, Number 241)] [Rules and Regulations] [Page 75236-75243] From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov] [DOCID:fr16de04-7] DEPARTMENT

More information

MEETING MINUTES Page 1 of 5

MEETING MINUTES   Page 1 of 5 Page 1 of 5 50178.000 May 26, 2009 PROJECT PROJECT NO. MEETING DATE ISSUE DATE Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting MEETING LOCATION MEETING PURPOSE Amy Eckland ISSUED BY SIGNATURE PARTICIPANT See attached

More information

The major parties key coastal policy initiatives

The major parties key coastal policy initiatives NEWSLETTER July 2016 EDITORIAL: Coastal policies of major parties inadequate By Barry Sammels Chair, Australian Coastal Councils Association and Mayor, City of Rockingham With the result of the 2016 Federal

More information

CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION

CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION Purpose and Scope The information presented in this report represents the study findings for the 2016 Ronan Airport Master Plan prepared for the City of Ronan and Lake County, the

More information

AIRSIDE CAPACITY AND FACILITY REQUIREMENTS

AIRSIDE CAPACITY AND FACILITY REQUIREMENTS AIRSIDE CAPACITY AND FACILITY REQUIREMENTS This Section investigates the capacity of the airport, its ability to meet current demand, and the facilities required to meet forecasted needs as established

More information

P U B L I C N O T I C E. MBS International Airport Freeland, Michigan Passenger Facility Charge (PFC) Application C-00-MBS

P U B L I C N O T I C E. MBS International Airport Freeland, Michigan Passenger Facility Charge (PFC) Application C-00-MBS P U B L I C N O T I C E MBS International Airport Freeland, Michigan Passenger Facility Charge (PFC) Application 10-07-C-00-MBS INTRODUCTION: This Public Notice is issued as part of a Federal Aviation

More information

Kirkcaldy Sea Wall Improvements. Non-technical Summary. For illustration purposes only to give an indicative representation of the scheme.

Kirkcaldy Sea Wall Improvements. Non-technical Summary. For illustration purposes only to give an indicative representation of the scheme. ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT Non-technical Summary For illustration purposes only to give an indicative representation of the scheme. Kirkcaldy Sea Wall Improvements Introduction A concrete sea wall fronts

More information

Presentation Overview

Presentation Overview DON NARROWS Historical and Existing Conditions March 29, 2008 Presentation Overview 1. Project Location and Background 2. Historical Context How did the Don Narrows Come to Be? 3. The Today 4. Next Steps

More information

Super Efficient High Value BREEZY POINT. Beach Homes. AmeriSus

Super Efficient High Value BREEZY POINT. Beach Homes. AmeriSus BREEZY POINT Super Efficient High Value Beach Homes AmeriSus The AmeriSus approach to home building provides the highest value for the lowest cost as a result of our changing the way homes get built. Lost

More information

Rebuilding Plan For Mosul International Airport

Rebuilding Plan For Mosul International Airport Rebuilding Plan For Mosul International Airport Contents Part- 1 General Information About Mosul International Airport (MIA) Before 2014 Part -2 Brief Description to Current Situation Part -2 Reconstruction

More information

4. Serrated Trailing Edge Blade Designs and Tunnel Configuration

4. Serrated Trailing Edge Blade Designs and Tunnel Configuration Chapter 4: Serrated Trailing Edge Blade Designs 97 CHAPTER FOUR 4. Serrated Trailing Edge Blade Designs and Tunnel Configuration 4.1 Introduction To evaluate the effectiveness of trailing edge serrations

More information

Appendix 4.8 A. Agency Correspondence and Final APE Statement

Appendix 4.8 A. Agency Correspondence and Final APE Statement Appendix 4.8 A Agency Correspondence and Final APE Statement Area of Potential Effect for Cultural Resources Introduction The South Coast Rail project requires review by the Army Corps of Engineers (Corps),

More information

Lake Erie Commerce Center Traffic Analysis

Lake Erie Commerce Center Traffic Analysis LOCATION: East of NYS Route 5 at Bayview Road Town of Hamburg Erie County, New York PREPARED BY: Wendel Companies 140 John James Audubon Parkway Suite 200 Amherst, New York 14228 January 2012 i ii Table

More information

Crew Chief: Start Date: Completion Date: T & A Code:

Crew Chief: Start Date: Completion Date: T & A Code: Completed Work Data Work order # Crew Chief: Start Date: Completion Date: T & A Code: Work Complete Comments: Personnel Service: Equipment: Item ID# Hours/Miles Rental Cost Supplies & Materials: Item Invoice#

More information

BOARD OF AIRPORT COMMISSIONERS

BOARD OF AIRPORT COMMISSIONERS 1 8/17/2018 8/21/2018 8/16/2018 i ElY MY Y I : JH MT BY...01,, III1*.ji,"1.111Los Angeles World Airports REPORT TO THE BOARD OF AIRPORT COMMISSIONERS Meeting Date: la Approved by: e1. "ampbell, Chief Airports

More information

PUBLIC NOTICE FOR PROPOSED COLLECTION OF PASSENGER FACILITY CHARGES AT COLORADO SPRINGS AIRPORT

PUBLIC NOTICE FOR PROPOSED COLLECTION OF PASSENGER FACILITY CHARGES AT COLORADO SPRINGS AIRPORT PUBLIC NOTICE FOR PROPOSED COLLECTION OF PASSENGER FACILITY CHARGES AT COLORADO SPRINGS AIRPORT Date of Public Notice: 8/15/2016 In accordance with the requirements of Section 158.24 of Federal Aviation

More information

Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC Mountain Valley Pipeline Project Docket No. CP

Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC Mountain Valley Pipeline Project Docket No. CP 16. Prior to construction, Mountain Valley shall file with the Secretary, for review and approval by the Director of OEP, a segment-specific construction and operation access plan for the area between

More information

[Docket No. FAA ; Directorate Identifier 2006-NM-180-AD; Amendment ; AD ]

[Docket No. FAA ; Directorate Identifier 2006-NM-180-AD; Amendment ; AD ] [Federal Register: May 8, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 90)] [Rules and Regulations] [Page 25970-25974] From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov] [DOCID:fr08my08-4] DEPARTMENT OF

More information

Table of Contents. Location... 1 Cultural Heritage Value... 3 Site History... 4 Physical Description... 6 Conclusion... 7 Sources...

Table of Contents. Location... 1 Cultural Heritage Value... 3 Site History... 4 Physical Description... 6 Conclusion... 7 Sources... Executive Summary The Outdoor Firing Range, located west of the Small Arms Building at 1300 Lakeshore Road East, merits designation under the Ontario Heritage Act for its historical, architectural and

More information