High Power, cold start. High Power, hot start. Low power. stove testing, Time to bake (min.)

Transcription

1 # Stove Test type and performance measure Results 2 Mirt stove (classic) CCT 508 hot -51% Time to bake (min.) 127 5% IAP Kitchen Carbonmonoxide (CO) 6.09 concentration (8hours average, ppm) Kitchen particulate matter (PM) concentration (8hours % difference -92% -31% 1 Mirt stove (slim) CCT % Memo, Result of (g/kg) stove testing, Time to bake (min.) 129 7% Hiwote Teshome, Internal report, GTZ- SUN: Energy, average, mg/m 3 ) Three stones/ open fire CCT 1031 Baseline (For injera baking) Time to bake (min.) 121 IAP Kitchen Carbonmonoxide (CO) 78.9 concentration (8hours average, ppm) Kitchen particulate matter (PM) concentration (8hours average, mg/m 3 ) 0.98 comparisons stoves in #1, 2) - Injera baking stove - In both stoves here, scoria (redash) is used as a constituent raw material together with cement (alternatively, river sand or pumice could be used to replace scoria)

2 hot 4 Mirt stove with CCT % Stove testing integrated chimney Time to bake (min.) % results, A report on controlled cooking test results 5 Institutional mirt CCT Average specific fuel % performed on Mirt with integrated chimney and Institutional mirt stoves, Report by: consumption Anteneh Gulilat, May 23, Time to bake (min.) % - Injera baking stoves - stoves here are compared three stones open fire whose performance reported in #3 above. 6 Metal charcoal stove WBT Time to boil (min.) 31 Baseline Memo, Result of stove testing, Thermal efficiency (%) 23 comparisons Hiwote Teshome, 550 stove internal report, GTZ- in #7) SUN: Energy, Lakech charcoal stove WBT Time to boil (min.) 32 3% Thermal efficiency (%) 38 65% %

3 hot 8 Tikikil stove (single skirt) WBT Time to boil (min.) %, -15%** 9 Three stones/open fire WBT Thermal efficiency (%) %, 118%, 141% %, -58%, - 59% Time to boil (min.) Thermal efficiency (%) Baseline comparison stoves in #8) Water Test Results of Various Types of Household Wood Stoves for Noninjera cooking, Ethio Resource Group PLC. (for GTZ- SUN:E), June, Cooking

4 hot 10 Tikikil stove (double skirt) WBT Time to boil (min.) %, -23% Water Boiling Test Thermal efficiency (%) %, 190%, 211% %, -65%, - 71% 11 Tikikil stove (Delux Tikikil) WBT Time to boil (min.) %, 28% Thermal efficiency (%) %, 200%, 233% %, -69%, - 85% 12 Three stones/open fire WBT Time to boil (min.) Baseline Thermal efficiency (%) comparison stoves in #10 and 11) Results of Various Types of Household and Institutional Wood Stoves for Non-Injera Cooking (Draft), Ethio Resource Group PLC. (for GTZ- SUN:E), December 2009 note the difference in the results similar stove in #9.

5 hot 13 Institutional rocket stove WBT Time to boil (min.) Water Boiling and (10 liter) Thermal efficiency (%) Field Test Results of Institutional Rocket 14 Institutional rocket stove WBT Time to boil (min.) Stove (Draft), Ethio Resource Group- (20 liter) Thermal efficiency (%) ERG (for GTZ SUN E Project), Hilawe 15 Institutional rocket stove WBT Time to boil (min.) Lakew, September 2008 (30 liter) Thermal efficiency (%) Institutional rocket stove WBT Time to boil (min.) (100 liter) Thermal efficiency (%) *Percent difference stove is calculated by subtracting the value of a stove performance measure from the corresponding value of the stove, dividing the difference by the latter and finally multiplying the result by 100. Furthermore, positive percentage for thermal efficiency difference means that the stove is better than the stove. On the other hand, percentage differences of positives for specific fuel consumption, time to boil/bake and IAP concentration means that the stove is worse than the stove. ** The two or the three values are corresponding to the different phases of WBT (i.e., hot and simmering phases).