METROBUS SERVICE GUIDELINES
|
|
- Lauren Butler
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 METROBUS SERVICE GUIDELINES In the late 1990's when stabilization of bus service was accomplished between WMATA and the local jurisdictional bus systems, the need for service planning processes and procedures was determined. The Regional Mobility Panel recommended service criteria be developed to allow evaluation of regional bus service provided by WMATA. Regional routes are usually bus routes on major arterial roadways and generally cross jurisdictional lines and are subsidized by all compact jurisdictions. In consultation with the local jurisdictions the following service guidelines were developed and adopted by the WMATA Board of Directors in February, The same set of guidelines is used for regional and non-regional service at WMATA. The basis for calculating the guidelines is the average of the two distinct services. The guidelines are recalculated annually based on the past year's performance. BUS SERVICE CRITERIA DAILY WEEKDAY PASSENGER BOARDINGS This measurement is to evaluate the overall ridership generated by each bus line. This measurement compares actual ridership on a line to the average for regional and non-regional service. If the ridership is less than 1/8 th, the line does not meet the minimum guideline. COST RECOVERY This measurement is one of two financial guidelines used to evaluate the cost/benefit of each line. This measurement compares the revenue generated on a line versus the cost of providing the service. If the line does not recover 1/2 of the average of the regional or non-regional average, it does not meet the minimum guideline. AVERAGE SUBSIDY PER PASSENGER This is the second financial guideline use to evaluate the cost/benefit of each line. This measurement compares the level of subsidy provided for each passenger carried for each line. If the line requires a subsidy at twice the system average, it does not meet the guideline. PASSENGERS PER REVENUE TRIP This is one of two guidelines used to evaluate the overall productivity of each line. This measurement compares the number of average weekday passengers that travel on a bus line divided by the number of weekday bus trips provided on that line. If the passengers per trip on the line are less than 1/3 of the average, the line does not meet the guideline. PASSENGERS PER REVENUE MILE This is the second guideline use to evaluate the productivity of each line. This measurement compares the number of passengers that travel on a given line for each mile of operation in revenue service. If the line does not carry ridership at 1/3 the average of the system, the line does not meet the guideline. These adopted criteria are considered along with other factors in the evaluation of service and assist WMATA and the jurisdictions in finalizing annual service requirements and financial commitments. Page 1 of 25
2 Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority METROBUS REGIONAL BUS SERVICES PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT January 2000 Page 2 of 25
3 Metrobus Regional Bus Services Performance Assessment Report SECTION I: LINE PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT The Regional Mobility Panel recommended that WMATA, in consultation with the local jurisdictions, plan and operate a regional bus service. In 1998 the Board approved the creation of a regional bus network and a formula to determine how to pay for regional service. Staff was then directed to develop policy and procedures for implementing service changes on regional routes. This document, which will be referred to as the Route Performance Assessment report, will be used as a tool to assess the performance of existing routes. The objective of the Route Performance Analysis report is to provide documentation for the systematic evaluation of the performance of all regional Metrobus routes. The systematic route performance evaluation is a two step process as directed by the Board. The first step involves documenting the performance of existing service using pre-established performance indicators and measures. This is done by using the scheduling database and monthly GFI report database to produce the Route Performance Analysis report. The second step in the process applies a set of performance guidelines against each line to assess its performance to determine if service adjustments are initiated. ROUTE PERFORMANCE The Route Performance Assessment report uses a set of performance indicators and performance measures to document the level of performance for each line. They are used to determine the effectiveness and efficiency of each line and provide a comprehensive view of service performance. Performance Indicators The following performance indicators will be used:! Platform Miles! Total Passengers! Platform Hours! Passengers Per Trip! Revenue Miles! Revenue! Revenue Hours! Cost! Number of Trips Page 3 of 25
4 Metrobus Regional Bus Services Performance Assessment Report Definitions The following are the definitions of the performance indicators that will be used to document each lines performance: Revenue Service - Operating from terminal to terminal while boarding and alighting passengers. Revenue Miles - Actual miles that are scheduled to be operated in revenue service. Revenue Hours - Actual hours that are schedule to be operated in revenue service. Platform Miles - Revenue miles operated, plus dead head miles for pull-in and pull-out and/or interlining. Platform Hours - This indicator is determined by calculating the time the bus pulls-out of the garage until the time it pullsin. Number of Trips - The number of revenue trips scheduled to be operated Passengers - Actual number of passengers on a particular line that are reported from the most recent monthly farebox report. Passengers Per Trip - Calculated by dividing the number of passengers by the number of revenue trips operated on a specific line. Revenue - The number of passengers on a line multiplied by the average fare ($.77) or $2.00 for express lines. Page 4 of 25
5 Metrobus Regional Bus Services Performance Assessment Report Performance Measures Performance measures are used to quantify the performance of every line. They are as follows:! Cost Per Passenger! Subsidy Per Passenger! Cost Recovery! Cost Recovery! Passengers Per Revenue Hour! Passengers Per Hour! Passengers Per Revenue Mile! Load Factor! Load Factor! Cost Per Mile Definitions The following are the definitions of the performance measures that will be used to document each lines performance: Cost Effectiveness - measures the amount of service consumed relative to the resources required to provide service. Cost Recovery - This is the most direct measure of financial return on operating investment. It is calculated by dividing revenue by the cost of providing the service. This produces a percentage and it measures how much of the cost to operate a line is recovered through passenger fares. Cost Per Passenger - It is calculated by dividing the cost for providing the service by the number of passenger boardings. It measures the cost of providing service on a unit basis. Service Effectiveness - measures the amount of service consumed relative to the amount of service provided. Peak Hour Maximum Load Factor - It measures the number of passengers on the bus at the maximum load point (the point that historically has the most passengers aboard the bus at any one time). It is calculated using pointchecks to determine the number passengers at the maximum load point, divided by the number of seats that were available. The goal is to maintain an average number of passengers Page 5 of 25
6 Metrobus Regional Bus Services Performance Assessment Report on each bus during the peak hour. Therefore, load factor is actually an average. Some trips will have more passengers and others less. A load factor of.90 means 90% of the available seats were occupied within a specified time period (15 or 30 minutes). Passengers Per Revenue Hour - It is calculated by dividing the total number of passengers by the total number of revenue hours. It measures the consumption of service relative to the amount of service provided on a unit basis. Passengers Per Mile - It is calculated by dividing the total number of passengers by the total number of revenue miles operated. It measures the consumption of service relative to the amount of service provided on a unit basis. Service Efficiency - Measures the amount of service provided relative to the resources required to deliver that service. Cost Per Mile - Measures the efficiency of the service provided by a specific unit. It is calculated by dividing total cost by the number of revenue miles operated. It allows you to analyze the line to determine which segments are the strongest performers. Subsidy Per Passenger - This is a direct measure of the cost the jurisdictions are paying to provide one passenger trip. Subsidy Per Passenger is calculated by dividing actual revenue collected by the number of passenger boardings. To develop a process that is more manageable and precise, the number of measures that will be used to determine if a service change is required was reduced. To accurately measure a line s performance it should be assessed based on service effectiveness and cost effectiveness. These quantitative classes measure the amount of service consumed by passengers relative to the amount of service provided and resources required. Therefore, three performance measures are used to give an overall representative view of a line s overall performance. They are:! Cost Recovery! Load Factor! Passengers Per Revenue Hour Page 6 of 25
7 Metrobus Regional Bus Services Performance Assessment Report LINE CLASSIFICATION Line performance monitoring evaluates all bus service on a comparative or relative basis. This is done by using the above selected performance indicators and performance measures. However, to provide a better indication of how a line s performance truly ranks against other lines, they must be grouped to provide a more accurate comparison. Each line is classified as either being radial, crosstown, or express. Line classification is used because lines within certain classifications may have characteristics that lead to them performing at a different level than other classifications. Radial lines are oriented toward downtown along major corridors. They typically have a higher number of boardings and lower level of alighting before they reach their downtown destination. Crosstown lines are characterized by heavy boarding and alighting activity in both directions. This makes crosstown lines more efficient because a seat is more likely to be sold more than once. Express lines typically operate in the peak flow direction only and deadhead to/from the garage, or to make an additional trip. This makes it less efficient because a large percentage of the miles are operated in non-revenue service. In general, there is no turnover of passengers because they have the same destination. Once each line is grouped by its line classification, the average of that classification for each performance measure will be calculated. This will provide an indication of the range of performance within the line classification. We will also highlight lines which are 120% above the average and 60% below the average to identify what lines may need additional service or lines that may require a service reduction. The Line Performance Assessment report will be produced bi-annually and submitted to the jurisdictions in January and July of each year. Page 7 of 25
8 Metrobus Regional Bus Services Performance Assessment Report SECTION II: LINE PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT The second step in the line performance evaluation process applies a set of performance guidelines against the performance of each line to assess it s performance. This is done to assess if additional service may be required, a reduction of service may be required, or if the line is operating within an acceptable level. Guidelines have been developed for the set of three performance measures that were identified in the first step as providing the best indication of a lines true performance, cost recovery, passengers per hour, and load factor. JUSTIFICATION FOR SERVICE CHANGES Guidelines will be used to set a minimum or maximum threshold that provides staff with the justification to add or reduce service to improve performance, and to assure adequacy of service to the riding public. By evaluating all services against guidelines, it is possible to identify areas where additional service will benefit passengers, as well as a reduction of service that will enhance economic return to WMATA. A service increase will only be considered after staff has determined that a no cost service alternative does not exist. Page 8 of 25
9 Metrobus Regional Bus Services Performance Assessment Report Justification to Add Service When a bus service problem is identified that may require additional service, staff will review existing data or collect additional data to identify the service requirement. To determine if additional service is required three guidelines have been identified. These guidelines were approved by the Board in May, They are: Three guidelines 1. Load factor (radial, crosstown, and express) 2. Running time 3. Non-peak productivity standard 1. Load Factor A service increase is warranted if the ratio of passengers to seats at the maximum load point during the peak half-hour or non-peak hour exceeds the load factor guideline. The load factor differential by line type is as follows: Service Load Type Definition Factor Radial Operates over major arterials and corridors and is oriented toward major urban centers. Crosstown Provides service across corridors and generally does not serve urban centers. Express Operates over major travel corridors and includes significant non-stop segments oriented toward major centers. Off-peak (for all service types) Running Time Adjustments Service may be added if running time is insufficient and more than 33% of the trips on a line within a 30 minute period during the peak, or a 60 minute period during the off-peak are not able to start their next cycle on-time. Page 9 of 25
10 Metrobus Regional Bus Services Performance Assessment Report 3. Non-peak Productivity Service may be increased if ridership averages more than 30 passengers per revenue hour during non-peak hours (at the increased service level) and staff determines that an increase is warranted based on current performance trends. Justification for Reducing Service When it is determined that a no cost solution does not exist to improve a line that is not performing to its potential, a reduction of service may be warranted. Staff will review existing data or collect additional data to identify the cause of the problem. To determine if a reduction of service is required, two performance measures and guidelines have been identified. They are: 1. Load Factor The goal is to maintain a minimum load factor for each line classification. This may require service to be reduced to achieve the minimum goal. The minimum load factor differential by route type is as follows: Service Type Load Factor Radial Crosstown Express Off-peak Non-peak Productivity Service may be decreased if ridership averages less than 18 passengers per revenue hour during non-peak hours and staff determines that an decrease is warranted based on current performance trends. A reduction of service hours may result in improved performance. Page 10 of 25
11 RULES AND REGULATIONS FOR METROBUS OPERATIONS OCTOBER 1996 (Revised by Board resolution February 10, 2000) Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority 600 Fifth Street, NW! Washington, DC Page 11 of 25
12 RULES AND REGULATIONS FOR METROBUS OPERATIONS OCTOBER 1996 PURPOSE The rules and regulations set forth in this document have been established by action of the WMATA Board of Directors. They conform to recent changes in the WMATA Compact and amplify the Compact's language by defining the specific parameters governing the approval and implementation of fare and service changes. CONTENTS OF THIS DOCUMENT The contents of this document accomplish the following: 1. They define the approval process for :! Fare Increase! Fare Decrease! Promotion and Demonstration Fares! Fare Reimbursement! Major Service Decrease! Major Service Increase! Minor Service Decrease! Minor Service Increase! Emergency Service Change! Experimental Service Increase 2. They define the limits of "Major" and "Minor" with respect to service increases and decreases. 3. They define the requirements of the public hearing process regarding:! Pre-Hearing Notice, including time and posting locations! Post-Hearing Record! Notice of Service Change Page 12 of 25
13 RULES AND REGULATIONS FOR METROBUS OPERATIONS OCTOBER 1996 WMATA COMPACT The WMATA Compact contains the following language pertinent to fare and service change rules and regulations: Section 62 (a): The board shall not raise any fare or rate, nor implement a major service reduction, except after holding a public hearing with respect thereto. Section 62 (c): The board shall give at least fifteen days' notice for all public hearings. The notice shall be given by publication in a newspaper of daily circulation throughout the transit zone and such notice shall be published once a week for two consecutive weeks. The notice period shall start with the first day of publication. Notices of public hearings shall be posted in accordance with regulations promulgated by the board. FARE CHANGES A change to any WMATA fare, parking rate or other fee shall be subject to the following public hearing and approval requirements: Fare Change General Manager's Approval Board Approval Public Hearing Required Fare Increase M M Fare Decrease Promotion and Demonstration Fares (reductions only) Fare Reimbursement M M M Page 13 of 25
14 RULES AND REGULATIONS FOR METROBUS OPERATIONS OCTOBER 1996 SERVICE CHANGES A change to any Metrobus service shall be subject to the following public hearing and approval requirements: Service Change General Manager's Approval Board Approval Public Hearing Required Major Decrease M M Major Increase M(b) Minor Decrease Minor Increase Emergency (detour etc.) M (a) M (a) M (a) Experimental Service Increase M(c) (a) Board Informed and coordination with local jurisdiction if significant cost impact. (b) Public hearing only if requested by Board or local jurisdiction[s] affected. (c) Designated period not to exceed 18 months with the option to extend the period to 24 months at the Board s discretion; Board action required to make permanent during experimental period. Page 14 of 25
15 RULES AND REGULATIONS FOR METROBUS OPERATIONS OCTOBER 1996 DEFINITIONS Major Service Decrease Revenue Miles: One or more reductions in a single year that represent a total reduction in that year of more than 20% of a line's scheduled revenue miles, or Route Miles: One or more reductions in a single year that represent a total reduction in that year of more than 15% of a line's route miles, or Span of Service: One or more reductions in a single year that represent a total reduction in that year of more than one hour in the hours of service on a line, or Boardings: One or more eliminations of service in a year for more than 10% of a line's current riders. Minor Service Decrease Revenue Miles: All else not included in the definition of Major Decrease cited above. Route Miles: All else not included in the definition of Major Decrease cited above. Span of Service: All else not included in the definition of Major Decrease cited above. Boardings: All else not included in the definition of Major Decrease cited above. Note: All measurements of service impacts will be based on the service day of the change. As an example, the percentage reductions in a weekday decrease in Revenue Miles on a line will use the average weekday Revenue Miles on that line as a base; a Saturday change will use the average Saturday as the base, and the same for a Sunday. Page 15 of 25
16 RULES AND REGULATIONS FOR METROBUS OPERATIONS OCTOBER 1996 DEFINITIONS (continued) Minor Service Increase Rush Hour: Improve rush hour headways by less than ten minutes. Non-Rush Hour: Improve non-rush hour headways by less than 15 minutes. Major Service Increase Rush Hour: All else not included in the definition of Minor Service Increase cited above. Non-Rush Hour: All else not included in the definition of Minor Service Increase cited above. PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS When fare or service changes are being considered which require, as directed above, that public hearings be conducted, the Authority shall be guided by the following parameters: Pre-Hearing Notice Fifteen days' notice, once a week for two successive weeks. Notice shall be posted in newspapers of daily local circulation, as well as in Authority offices, and on all revenue vehicles serving the public directly affected by the change. Notice shall be made by additional means as the Board may direct. Page 16 of 25
17 RULES AND REGULATIONS FOR METROBUS OPERATIONS OCTOBER 1996 PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS (continued) Post-Hearing Record The Public Hearing Record shall remain open for five days after the hearing to receive further comments. Notice of Service Change Notice shall be posted in Authority offices and on all revenue vehicles serving the public directly affected by the change. Notice shall be made by additional means as the Board may direct. Page 17 of 25
18 Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority SERVICE GUIDELINES FOR REGIONAL METROBUS SERVICES Page 18 of 25
19 Service Guidelines for Regional Metrobus Services SECTION I: GUIDELINES FOR ADDING NEW LINES AND SERVICES The regional mobility plan as adopted, identified WMATA as the lead agency to develop a plan for regional bus needs. As the transit needs change within the Washington D.C. region, a guideline is needed to determine when new regional service may be implemented. Through regional service, Metrobus must meet the needs of emerging markets that can support transit. Identifying markets that can support transit and determining how to serve them is a task that WMATA staff will coordinate with the staff of the jurisdictions. Once a new market is identified, staff will use passenger demand as the performance measure for implementing new service. Passenger demand is determined by estimating the number of passengers that will utilize the service. Staff will recommend new service as needed as part of the fiscal year service plan during the budget process. Service will be developed in concert with local jurisdictions and presented to the board committees. The recommendation will include cost, subsidy, and performance goals for 6 months, 12 months, and, 18 months. SERVICE GUIDELINES FOR INTRODUCING NEW LINES AND SERVICES! Determine demand for new service! Semi-annual performance goals will be established! Evaluate new service recommendation to identify potential success! New service will be reviewed every six months to track ridership One Guideline! Minimum load factor Service will be recommended as an experimental line if it has the potential demand to achieve the minimum load factor for its line classification within an 18 month period. Page 19 of 25
20 Service Guidelines for Regional Metrobus Services The load factor is calculated by determining the number of passengers that pass the maximum load point, the number of trips made during the period, and the number of seats available on a bus. This load factor differential by line type is as follows: Line Classifications Minimum Load Factor! Radial - operates over major arterials and corridors and is oriented toward major urban centers.! Crosstown - provides service across corridors and generally does not serve urban centers.! Express - operates over major travel corridors and includes significant non-stop segments oriented toward major centers.! Off-peak (all service types) APPLICATION OF GUIDELINES As part of the on-going planning process staff will analyze the performance of lines using the proposed guidelines.! Specific data will be collected and analyzed with the jurisdictional staff.! Performance goals will be set and service will be reviewed every six months Page 20 of 25
21 Service Guidelines for Regional Metrobus Services SECTION II: GUIDELINES FOR ADDING SERVICE TO EXISTING LINES INTRODUCTION When a bus service overcrowding problem is identified, staff will review existing data or collect additional data to identify the cause of the problem. Then staff will investigate alternatives to determine if a no cost solution is possible. The following no cost alternatives are typically used by staff:! integrate headways along a corridor! adjust headways! replace smaller buses with larger buses! have a pull-out or pull-in trip make a revenue trip! redistribute running time! adjust recovery time! short turn trips! reroute to avoid congestion Only after it is determined that a no cost alternative does not exist will additional service be recommended. SERVICE GUIDELINES FOR ADDING SERVICE TO EXISTING LINES! effectively measure service performance! evaluate service adjustments as necessary to ensure application of guidelines for entire regional bus network.! on a semi-annual basis service changes will be reviewed to track the impact of the changes on the budget and ridership. Four Guidelines 1. load factor (radial, crosstown and express) 2. running time 3. non-peak productivity standard 4. regional equity optional at the Board s discretion Page 21 of 25
22 Service Guidelines for Regional Metrobus Services 1. Load Factor A service increase is warranted if the ratio of passengers to seats at the maximum load point during the peak half-hour or non-peak hour exceeds the load factor. The load factor is calculated by determining the number of passengers that pass the maximum load point, the number of trips made during the period, and the number of seats available on a bus (45). For example: 225 passengers divided by 5 trips, divided by 45 seats, yields a load factor of 1.0. This load factor differential by line type is as follows: Line Classification Load Factors! Radial - operates over major arterials and corridors and is oriented toward major urban centers.! Crosstown - provides service across corridors and generally does not serve urban centers.! Express - operates over major travel corridors and includes significant non-stop segments oriented toward major centers.! Off-peak (all service types) Running Time Adjustments Service will be added if running time is insufficient and more than 33% of the trips on a linee within a 30 minute period during the peak and 60 minute period during the off-peak are not able to start their next cycle on-time. 3. Non-peak Productivity Service will be increased if ridership averages more than 30 passengers per revenue hour during non-peak hours (at the increased service level). 4. Regional Equity at The Board s Discretion New service, line extensions or other service enhancements to new areas will be considered as an option to ensure regional equity as determined by relative subsidy contributions. It is at the boards discretion to consider this option. Page 22 of 25
23 Service Guidelines for Regional Metrobus Services APPLICATION OF GUIDELINES As part of the on-going planning process staff will analyze the performance of lines using the proposed guidelines. Before staff recommends service improvements, they will first identify any no cost alternatives. If staff cannot identify any no cost alternatives then the guidelines will be applied.! Specific data will be collected and analyzed with the jurisdictional staff.! The specific changes will be proposed.! The changes in service and the financial impact will be analyzed.! The final service change recommendations will be brought to the Board Operations and Budget Committees only if there is a budget implication. Page 23 of 25
24 Service Guidelines for Regional Metrobus Services SECTION III: GUIDELINES FOR REDUCING SERVICE ON EXISTING LINES INTRODUCTION When a bus service is identified as a candidate for reduction, staff will review existing data or collect additional data to identify the cause of the problem. Then staff will investigate alternatives to determine if a solution is possible. The following alternatives to reducing service are typically used by staff:! Integrate headways along a corridor! Adjust headways! Adjust trips! Replace larger buses with smaller buses! Short turn trips! Public information Only after it is determined that an alternative to reducing service does not exist will a reduction of service be recommended. SERVICE GUIDELINES FOR REDUCING SERVICE ON EXISTING LINES! Effectively measure service performance! Evaluate service adjustments as necessary to ensure application of guidelines for entire regional bus network.! Service changes will be reviewed on a semi-annual basis to track the impact of the changes on the budget and ridership. Two guidelines 1. Load factor (radial, crosstown, express and off-peak) 2. Non-peak productivity standard 1. Load Factor A service decrease is warranted if the ratio of passengers to seats at the maximum load point during the peak half-hour or non-peak hour does not meet the minimum load factor. The load factor is calculated by determining the number of passengers that pass the maximum load point, the number of trips made during the period, and the number of seats available on a bus. The goal is to maintain a minimum load factor for each line classification. This may require service to be reduced to achieve the minimum goal. The minimum load factor differential by line type is as follows: Page 24 of 25
25 Service Guidelines for Regional Metrobus Services Line Classification Load Factors! Radial - operates over major arterials and corridors and is oriented toward major urban centers.! Crosstown - provides service across corridors and generally does not serve urban centers.! Express - operates over major travel corridors and includes significant non-stop segments oriented toward major centers. 2. Non-peak Productivity Service may be decreased if ridership averages less than 18 passengers per revenue hour during non-peak hours and staff determines that a decrease in service is warranted based on current performance trends. A reduction of service hours may result in improved performance. APPLICATION OF GUIDELINES As part of the on-going planning process staff will analyze the performance of lines using the proposed guidelines. Before staff recommends a service reduction they will first identify any alternatives to reducing service. If staff cannot identify any alternatives, then the guidelines will be applied.! Specific data will be collected and analyzed with the jurisdictional staff.! The changes in service and the financial impact will be analyzed.! The final service change recommendations will be brought to the board operations and budget committees only if there is a budget implication. Page 25 of 25
RULES AND REGULATIONS
RULES AND REGULATIONS FOR METROBUS OPERATIONS OCTOBER 1996 (Revised by Board resolution February 10, 2000) Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority 600 Fifth Street, NW! Washington, DC 20001 PURPOSE
More informationAtt. A, AI 46, 11/9/17
Total s San Diego Metropolitan Transit System POLICY 42 PERFORMANCE MONITORING REPORT Page 1 of 6 Date: 11/8/17 OBJECTIVE Develop a Customer-Focused and Competitive System The following measures of productivity
More informationMount Pleasant (42, 43) and Connecticut Avenue (L1, L2) Lines Service Evaluation Study Open House Welcome! wmata.com/bus
Mount Pleasant (42, 43) and Connecticut Avenue (L1, L2) Lines Service Evaluation Study Open House Welcome! Study Overview and Timeline Phase 1: Collect and Analyze Data Project Kickoff, September 2017
More informationDate: 11/6/15. Total Passengers
Total San Diego Metropolitan Transit System POLICY 42 PERFORMANCE MONITORING REPORT Page 1 of 6 OBJECTIVE Develop a Customer-Focused and Competitive System The following measures of productivity and service
More informationSAMTRANS TITLE VI STANDARDS AND POLICIES
SAMTRANS TITLE VI STANDARDS AND POLICIES Adopted March 13, 2013 Federal Title VI requirements of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 were recently updated by the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) and now require
More informationCURRENT SHORT-RANGE TRANSIT PLANNING PRACTICE. 1. SRTP -- Definition & Introduction 2. Measures and Standards
CURRENT SHORT-RANGE TRANSIT PLANNING PRACTICE Outline 1. SRTP -- Definition & Introduction 2. Measures and Standards 3. Current Practice in SRTP & Critique 1 Public Transport Planning A. Long Range (>
More informationSAMTRANS SERVICE PLAN
Agenda Overview Part I: Key Findings Market Assessment Service Evaluation Part II: Service Development Framework Metrics Criteria Part III: Next Steps SAMTRANS SERVICE PLAN Preliminary Analysis and Criteria
More informationAppendix A: Regional Fare Policy, SANDAG
cover Appendix A: Regional Fare Policy, SANDAG BOARD POLICY NO. 029 REGIONAL FARE POLICY AND COMPREHENSIVE FARE ORDINANCE Purpose: To establish guidelines for setting a uniform, fair, and equitable areawide
More informationReport by Finance Committee (B) Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board Action/Information Summary
Report by Finance Committee (B) 07-28-2016 Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board Action/Information Summary Action Information MEAD Number: 201753 Resolution: Yes No TITLE: National Harbor
More informationTable of Contents. List of Tables
Table of Contents 1. Introduction... 1 2. Service Recommendations... 1 A. Extend Service on Fort Belvoir to New Post Exchange/Commissary Complex... 1 B. Improve Service Frequencies on Sunday from Current
More informationAPPENDIX B. Arlington Transit Peer Review Technical Memorandum
APPENDIX B Arlington Transit Peer Review Technical Memorandum Arlington County Appendix B December 2010 Table of Contents 1.0 OVERVIEW OF PEER ANALYSIS PROCESS... 2 1.1 National Transit Database...2 1.2
More informationTitle VI Service Equity Analysis
Pierce Transit Title VI Service Equity Analysis Pursuant to FTA Circular 4702.1B NE Tacoma Service May 2016 Pierce Transit Transit Development Dept. PIERCE TRANSIT TITLE VI SERVICE EQUITY ANALYSIS TABLE
More informationBus Operations Report
Third Quarter FY 216 (January 1 - March 31, 216) Wednesday April 27, 216 Operations Ridership: 783,194 passengers used in the third quarter. This represents a 2% increase over the same period in FY 215.
More informationEstablishes a fare structure for Tacoma Link light rail, to be implemented in September 2014.
RESOLUTION NO. R2013-24 Establish a Fare Structure and Fare Level for Tacoma Link MEETING: DATE: TYPE OF ACTION: STAFF CONTACT: PHONE: Board 09/26/2013 Final Action Ric Ilgenfritz, Executive Director,
More informationChapter 3. Burke & Company
Chapter 3 Burke & Company 3. WRTA RIDERSHIP AND RIDERSHIP TRENDS 3.1 Service Overview The Worcester Regional Transit Authority (WRTA) provides transit service to over half a million people. The service
More informationLA Metro Rapid - Considerations in Identifying BRT Corridors. Martha Butler LACMTA, Transportation Planning Manager Los Angeles, California
LA Metro Rapid - Considerations in Identifying BRT Corridors Martha Butler LACMTA, Transportation Planning Manager Los Angeles, California LA Metro Transportation planner/coordinator, designer, builder
More informationAPPENDIX B COMMUTER BUS FAREBOX POLICY PEER REVIEW
APPENDIX B COMMUTER BUS FAREBOX POLICY PEER REVIEW APPENDIX B COMMUTER BUS FAREBOX POLICY PEER REVIEW The following pages are excerpts from a DRAFT-version Fare Analysis report conducted by Nelson\Nygaard
More informationFollow-up to Proposed Fare Changes for FY2013
Finance & Administration Committee Information Item I-A January 19, 2012 Follow-up to Proposed Fare Changes for FY2013 1 of 22 Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board Action/Information Summary
More informationOctober REGIONAL ROUTE PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS
October 2018 2017 REGIONAL ROUTE PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS The Council s mission is to foster efficient and economic growth for a prosperous metropolitan region Metropolitan Council Members Alene Tchourumoff
More informationBus Corridor Service Options
Bus Corridor Service Options Outline Corridor Objectives and Strategies Express Local Limited Stop Overlay on Local Service 1 Deadhead 1 Stacey Schwarcz, "Service Design for Heavy Demand Corridors: Limited-Stop
More informationTitle VI Service Equity Analysis
Pierce Transit Title VI Service Equity Analysis Pursuant to FTA Circular 4702.1B September 2013 Service Change February 2013 Page intentionally left blank PIERCE TRANSIT TITLE VI SERVICE EQUITY ANALYSIS
More informationSilver Line Operating Plan
Customer Service and Operations Committee Information Item IV-A December 6, 2012 Silver Line Operating Plan Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board Action/Information Summary Action Information
More informationDRAFT Service Implementation Plan
2017 Service Implementation Plan October 2016 SECTION NAME 2017 Service Implementation Plan October 2016 2017 SERVICE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents... I List of Tables... III
More informationAGENDA GUEMES ISLAND FERRY OPERATIONS PUBLIC FORUM
AGENDA GUEMES ISLAND FERRY OPERATIONS PUBLIC FORUM Wednesday, August 17, 211 6: p.m. Guemes Island Community Hall ~ 7549 Guemes Island Road Thank you for attending the second Annual Public Forum in 211.
More informationSRTA Year End Fixed Route Ridership Analysis: FY 2018
SRTA Year End Fixed Route Ridership Analysis: FY 2018 2018 Contents Introduction... 1 A. Key Terms Used in this Report... 1 Key Findings... 2 A. Ridership... 2 B. Fare Payment... 4 Performance Analysis
More informationOperational Performance
Customer Services, Operations, and Safety Committee Board Action/Information Item III-A January 10, 2008 Operational Washington Metropolitan Area Transportation Authority Board Action/Information Summary
More informationTransit Performance Report FY (JUNE 30, 2007)
Transit Performance Report FY 2006-2007 (JUNE 30, 2007) J ANUARY 2008 TRANSIT PERFORMANCE REPORT FY 2006 2007 (JUNE 30, 2007) Transit Performance Report I SSUED: JANUARY 2008 The Transit Performance Report
More informationCorridor Analysis. Corridor Objectives and Strategies Express Local Limited Stop Overlay on Local Service 1 Deadhead
Corridor Analysis Outline Corridor Objectives and Strategies Express Local Limited Stop Overlay on Local Service 1 Deadhead 1 Stacey Schwarcz, "Service Design for Heavy Demand Corridors: Limited-Stop Bus
More information2017/ Q1 Performance Measures Report
2017/2018 - Q1 Performance Measures Report Contents Ridership & Revenue... 1 Historical Revenue & Ridership... 1 Revenue Actual vs. Planned... 3 Mean Distance Between Failures... 5 Maintenance Cost Quarter
More information2017/2018 Q3 Performance Measures Report. Revised March 22, 2018 Average Daily Boardings Comparison Chart, Page 11 Q3 Boardings figures revised
2017/2018 Q3 Performance Measures Report Revised March 22, 2018 Average Daily Boardings Comparison Chart, Page 11 Q3 Boardings figures revised Contents Ridership & Revenue... 1 Historical Revenue & Ridership...
More informationSAN LUIS OBISPO TRANSIT + SAN LUIS OBISPO RTA JOINT SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLANS: SERVICE STRATEGIES. Presented by: Gordon Shaw, PE, AICP; Principal
SAN LUIS OBISPO TRANSIT + SAN LUIS OBISPO RTA JOINT SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLANS: SERVICE STRATEGIES Presented by: Gordon Shaw, PE, AICP; Principal Project Status Review of existing services and setting complete
More informationPERFORMANCE REPORT NOVEMBER 2017
PERFORMANCE REPORT NOVEMBER 2017 Note: New FY2018 Goal/Target/Min or Max incorporated in the Fixed Route and Connection Dashboards. Keith A. Clinkscale Performance Manager INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND In June
More informationPERFORMANCE REPORT DECEMBER 2017
PERFORMANCE REPORT DECEMBER 2017 Note: New FY2018 Goal/Target/Min or Max incorporated in the Fixed Route and Connection Dashboards. Keith A. Clinkscale Performance Manager INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND Keith
More informationFY Transit Needs Assessment. Ventura County Transportation Commission
FY 18-19 Transit Needs Assessment Ventura County Transportation Commission Contents List of Figures and Appendices.. 2 Appendices... 1 Chapter 1: Introduction What is the Ventura County Transportation
More informationYOSEMITE AREA REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM
YOSEMITE AREA REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM Short Range Transit Plan Prepared for the Merced County Association of Governments/YARTS Prepared by LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. YOSEMITE AREA REGIONAL
More informationHOW TO IMPROVE HIGH-FREQUENCY BUS SERVICE RELIABILITY THROUGH SCHEDULING
HOW TO IMPROVE HIGH-FREQUENCY BUS SERVICE RELIABILITY THROUGH SCHEDULING Ms. Grace Fattouche Abstract This paper outlines a scheduling process for improving high-frequency bus service reliability based
More informationEXHIBIT 1. BOARD AUTHORIZATION FOR PUBLIC HEARING AND SUBSEQUENT ISSUANCE OF A JOINT DEVELOPMENT SOLICITATION
EXHIBIT 1. BOARD AUTHORIZATION FOR PUBLIC HEARING AND SUBSEQUENT ISSUANCE OF A JOINT DEVELOPMENT SOLICITATION Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board Action/Information Summary @Action O Information
More informationRegional Fare Change Overview. Nick Eull Senior Manager of Revenue Operations Metro Transit
Regional Fare Change Overview Nick Eull Senior Manager of Revenue Operations Metro Transit Committee of the Whole April 5 th, 2017 Today s Presentation Fare change goals and considerations Public engagement
More informationQuarterly Report Transit Bureau, Local Transit Operations. First Quarter, Fiscal Year 2015 (July 2014 September 2014) ART & STAR
Quarterly Report Transit Bureau, Local Transit Operations First Quarter, Fiscal Year 2015 (July 2014 September 2014) ART & STAR A Arlington Transit ART 1) Introduction The purpose of ART is to provide
More informationCOLT RECOMMENDED BUSINESS PLAN
COLT RECOMMENDED BUSINESS PLAN 2008 INTRODUCTION The past decade has been one of change in Lebanon County and this situation is expected to continue in the future. This has included growth in population,
More informationAPPENDIX 2 TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION SERVICE STANDARDS AND DECISION RULES FOR PLANNING TRANSIT SERVICE
APPENDIX 2 TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION SERVICE STANDARDS AND DECISION RULES FOR PLANNING TRANSIT SERVICE Contents 1 Introduction... 1 2 Network Design Standards... 2 2.1 Transit Service Classifications...
More informationARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of February 22, 2014
ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting of February 22, 2014 DATE: January 23, 2014 SUBJECT: Request to authorize advertisement of a public hearing to consider an ordinance amending
More informationSKAGIT COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Ferry Operations Division Ferry Fare Revenue Target Report
SKAGIT COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Ferry Operations Division 2018 Ferry Fare Revenue Target Report Skagit County Public Works Department 2018 Ferry Fare Revenue Target Report The following report is
More informationFare Policy Discussion Background and History
Fare Policy Discussion Background and History Transportation Committee Nick Eull Senior Manager of Revenue Operations February 27 th, 2017 2013 Fare Policy Analysis Report Cross-functional group comprised
More informationInterstate 90 and Mercer Island Mobility Study APRIL Commissioned by. Prepared by
Interstate 90 and Mercer Island Mobility Study APRIL 2017 Commissioned by Prepared by Interstate 90 and Mercer Island Mobility Study Commissioned by: Sound Transit Prepared by: April 2017 Contents Section
More information8 CROSS-BOUNDARY AGREEMENT WITH BRAMPTON TRANSIT
8 CROSS-BOUNDARY AGREEMENT WITH BRAMPTON TRANSIT The Transportation Services Committee recommends the adoption of the recommendations contained in the following report dated May 27, 2010, from the Commissioner
More informationSound Transit Operations June 2016 Service Performance Report. Ridership
Ridership Total Boardings by Mode Mode Jun-15 Jun-16 % YTD-15 YTD-16 % ST Express 1,622,222 1,617,420-0.3% 9,159,934 9,228,211 0.7% Sounder 323,747 361,919 11.8% 1,843,914 2,099,824 13.9% Tacoma Link 75,396
More informationMONTHLY REPORT SEPTEMBER 2017
MONTHLY REPORT 2017 SUN SHUTTLE RIDERSHIP ROUTE PASSENGERS: CURRENT YEAR PRIOR YEAR AMOUNT PERCENTAGE BUDGET AMOUNT PERCENTAGE TOTAL PASSENGERS 17,250 20,318 (3,068) -15.1% 18,231 (981) -5.4% CALENDAR
More informationFiscal Management and Control Board. Fare Policy October 16, Draft for Discussion & Policy Purposes Only
Fiscal Management and Control Board Fare Policy October 16, 2015 1 Components of Fares Fare Level Different types of pricing by: By mode By time of day By distance By rider type (reduced fare) Subscription
More informationSound Transit Operations August 2015 Service Performance Report. Ridership
Ridership Total Boardings by Mode Mode Aug-14 Aug-15 % YTD-14 YTD-15 % ST Express 1,534,241 1,553,492 1.3% 11,742,839 12,354,957 5.2% Sounder 275,403 326,015 18.4% 2,139,086 2,463,422 15.2% Tacoma Link
More informationService Performance 2010 Networked Family of Services
Service Performance 2010 Networked Family of Services Overview RTD s Mission is: "To meet our constituents' present and future public transit needs by offering safe, clean, reliable, courteous, accessible
More informationMETROPOLITAN EVANSVILLE TRANSIT SYSTEM Part I: Comprehensive Operations Analysis Overview July 9 th, 2015 Public Information Meeting
METROPOLITAN EVANSVILLE TRANSIT SYSTEM Part I: Comprehensive Operations Analysis Overview July 9 th, 2015 Public Information Meeting AGENDA 5:30 5:40 Open House 5:40 6:30 Presentation Comprehensive Operations
More informationMetrobus Service Evaluations
Metrobus Service Evaluations Routes B30, 87-88, & 89-89M Public Meeting Laurel Library May 25, 2011 Ben Schumin Purpose of the Evaluation Identify strategic needs; Review capacity, productivity, reliability,
More informationWashington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Services Utilization Study
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Services Utilization Study Maryland House Bill 300 Table of Contents Page 2 Executive Summary Slide 3 Notes Slide 4 Metro Systemwide Fact Sheet Slide 5 How
More informationFY Year End Performance Report
Overall Ridership Big Blue Bus carried 18,748,869 passengers in FY2014-2015, a 0.3% reduction from the year prior. This negligible reduction in ridership represents the beginnings of a reversal from a
More informationBOSTON REGION METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION
PLANNING ORGANIZATIO BOSTON REGION MPO NMETROPOLITAN BOSTON REGION METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION Stephanie Pollack, MassDOT Secretary and CEO and MPO Chair Karl H. Quackenbush, Executive Director,
More informationAttachment C: 2017/2018 Halifax Transit Year End Performance Report. 2017/2018 Year End Performance Measures Report
Attachment C: 2017/2018 Halifax Transit Year End Performance Report 2017/2018 Year End Performance Measures Report Contents Annual Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)... 1 Weekday Cost per Passenger... 1
More informationExisting Services, Ridership, and Standards Report. June 2018
Existing Services, Ridership, and Standards Report June 2018 Prepared for: Prepared by: Contents Overview of Existing Conditions... 1 Fixed Route Service... 1 Mobility Bus... 34 Market Analysis... 41 Identification/Description
More informationPotomac River Commuter Ferry Feasibility Study & RPE Results
1.1 Introduction The Prince William County Department of Transportation conducted a route proving exercise (RPE) and feasibility study of a proposed commuter ferry service on the Potomac River between
More informationPeer Performance Measurement February 2019 Prepared by the Division of Planning & Market Development
2017 Regional Peer Review Peer Performance Measurement February 2019 Prepared by the Division of Planning & Market Development CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... 3 SNAPSHOT... 5 PEER SELECTION... 6 NOTES/METHODOLOGY...
More informationBoard of Directors Information Summary
Regional Public Transportation Authority 302 N. First Avenue, Suite 700, Phoenix, Arizona 85003 602-262-7433, Fax 602-495-0411 Board of Directors Information Summary Agenda Item #6 Date July 11, 2008 Subject
More informationSound Transit Operations December 2014 Service Performance Report. Ridership
Ridership Total Boardings by Mode Mode Dec-13 Dec-14 % YTD-13 YTD-14 % ST Express 1,266,130 1,396,787 10.3% 16,605,299 17,661,976 6.4% Sounder 248,710 285,016 14.6% 3,035,735 3,361,317 10.7% Tacoma Link
More informationTTI REVIEW OF FARE POLICY: PRELIMINARY FINDINGS
TTI REVIEW OF FARE POLICY: PRELIMINARY FINDINGS December 2014 STATUS: TTI REVIEW OF FARE POLICY Goal: Identify and evaluate different options for a revised fare structure, including pricing strategies
More informationII. Terminology and Basic
II. Terminology and Basic Relationships Public Transport Planning and Regulation: An Introduction II-1 Planning and Analysis Building Blocks Schedule Building Cost Analysis and Financial Planning Performance
More informationSound Transit Operations January 2017 Service Performance Report. Ridership. Total Boardings by Mode
January 217 Service Performance Report Ridership ST Express Sounder Tacoma Link Link Paratransit Jan-16 Jan-17 % 1,433,7 1,3,33 4.9% 331,27 7,121 98,411 3,633 Total Boardings by Mode 363,6 74,823 1,76,914
More informationCHAPTER 5: Operations Plan
CHAPTER 5: Operations Plan Report Prepared by: Contents 5 OPERATIONS PLAN... 5-1 5.1 Proposed Service Changes... 5-2 5.1.1 Fiscal Year 2017... 5-2 5.1.2 Fiscal Year 2018... 5-6 5.1.3 Fiscal Year 2019...
More informationMONTHLY OPERATIONS REPORT SEPTEMBER 2015
MONTHLY OPERATIONS REPORT SEPTEMBER 215 Table of Contents SEPTEMBER 215 Section Page September Highlights... 3 Strategic Goals Progress Update... 4 Ridership... 6 Revenue... 9 Expenses... 1 System Summary...
More informationThe 15-day comment period will run from Thursday, April 4, 2019 to 4pm on Wednesday April 18, 2019.
Proposed Service Standards-Title VI Program Update 2019 April 3, 2019 The Cape Ann Transportation Authority is seeking input on service standards and service policies proposed as part of the Title VI Program
More informationROUTE EBA EAST BUSWAY ALL STOPS ROUTE EBS EAST BUSWAY SHORT
ROUTE EBA EAST BUSWAY ALL STOPS ROUTE EBS EAST BUSWAY SHORT The EBA East Busway All Stops and EBS East Busway Short routes provide the core Martin Luther King Jr. East Busway services. Route EBA operates
More informationSERVICE GUIDELINES Revised April 2015
SERVICE GUIDELINES Revised April 2015 Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION... 1 2 RIPTA SERVICES... 2 Rapid Bus Routes... 2 Key Corridor Routes... 2 Urban Radial Routes... 2 Non-Urban/Suburban/Crosstown Routes...
More informationCall for Public Hearing August 2019 Service Changes
Call for Public Hearing August 2019 Service Changes Committee-of-the-Whole January 22, 2019 Rob Smith, AVP Service Planning & Scheduling 1 Recommendation To call a Public Hearing on March 12, 2019 for
More informationAnnual Route Report Operating Data. Prepared for: Board of Directors. Final 4/26/2018
Annual Route Report 2017 Operating Data Prepared for: Board of Directors Final 4/26/2018 Upon request, alternative formats of this document will be produced for people with disabilities. Please call 325-6094
More informationROUTE 61A EAST PITTSBURGH-WILKINSBURG
ROUTE 61A EAST PITTSBURGH-WILKINSBURG Route 61A East Pittsburgh-Wilkinsburg is a radial route that operates between East Pittsburgh and downtown Pittsburgh via North Braddock, Swissvale and Edgewood, Wilkinsburg,
More informationSeptember 2014 Prepared by the Department of Finance & Performance Management Sub-Regional Report PERFORMANCE MEASURES
September 2014 Prepared by the Department of Finance & Performance Management 2013 Sub-Regional Report PERFORMANCE MEASURES REGIONAL PERFORMANCE MEASURES RTA staff has undertaken the development of a performance
More informationApproval to Conduct Public Hearings to Increase Metrobus Charter Fee Schedule
Finance, Administration and Oversight Committee Action Item III-B July 10, 2008 Approval to Conduct Public Hearings to Increase Metrobus Charter Fee Schedule Page 24 of 81 http://mead/prod/reports/bais.cfm?requesttimeout=300
More informationLike many transit service providers, the Port Authority of Allegheny County (Port Authority) uses a set of service level guidelines to determine
Transit service consists of two fundamental elements: frequency (how often service operates) and service span (how long service runs during the day). Combined, these two factors measure how much service
More informationAlternatives: Strategies for Transit Systems Change
Alternatives: Strategies for Transit Systems Change There is a broad array of options for modification of transit operations to make it more cost effective and efficient. These are typically examined to
More informationSound Transit Operations March 2018 Service Performance Report. Ridership
March 218 Service Performance Report Ridership Total Boardings by Mode Mar-17 Mar-18 % YTD-17 YTD-18 % ST Express 1,622,116 1,47,79-4.6% 4,499,798 4,428,14-1.6% Sounder 393,33 39,6.% 1,74,96 1,163,76 8.3%
More informationDRT Performance Measurement: the U.S. Experience
DRT Performance Measurement: the U.S. Experience FOR ANYBODY GOING ANYWHER IN LA HABRA International Conference on Demand Responsive Transportation Breckenridge, Colorado September 2016 DRT Performance
More informationFigure 1: Route 71A Negley
ROUTE 71A NEGLEY Route 71A Negley is one of the strongest routes in the PAAC system, and provides service between Highland Park and Downtown Pittsburgh and Highland Park via Oakland, Shadyside, and East
More informationPTN-128 Reporting Manual Data Collection and Performance Reporting
2016 PTN-128 Reporting Manual Data Collection and Performance Reporting Sponsored by the Texas Department of Transportation Table of Contents PTN-128 WHAT, WHY AND WHO... 6 What is the PTN-128... 13 Why
More informationATTACHMENT A.7. Transit Division Performance Measurements Report Fiscal Year Fourth Quarter
TTCHMENT.7 Transit Division Performance Measurements Report Fiscal Year 2012-13 Fourth Quarter Introduction The Orange County Transportation uthority (OCT) operates a countywide network of local, community,
More informationMemorandum. DATE: May 9, Board of Directors. Jim Derwinski, CEO/Executive Director. Fare Structure Study Fare Pilot Program
Memorandum DATE: May 9, 2018 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Board of Directors Jim Derwinski, CEO/Executive Director Fare Structure Study Fare Pilot Program RECOMMENDATION Board action is requested to approve an ordinance
More informationPeer Performance Measurement February 2019 Prepared by the Division of Planning & Market Development
2017 Sub-Regional Peer Review Peer Performance Measurement February 2019 Prepared by the Division of Planning & Market Development CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... 3 NOTES/METHODOLOGY... 6 AGENCIES... 7
More informationMatt Miller, Planning Manager Margaret Heath-Schoep, Paratransit & Special Projects Manager
DATE May 2, 218 Item #12 TO FROM GCTD Board of Directors Matt Miller, Planning Manager Margaret Heath-Schoep, Paratransit & Special Projects Manager MS SUBJECT I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This quarterly report
More informationPublic Transport Planning and Regulation: An Introduction
VI. Measures and Standards Public Transport Planning and Regulation: An Introduction VI-1 Planning and Analysis Building Blocks Schedule Building Cost Analysis and Financial Planning Performance Analysis
More informationMONTHLY OPERATIONS REPORT DECEMBER 2015
MONTHLY OPERATIONS REPORT DECEMBER 215 Table of Contents DECEMBER 215 Section Page December Highlights... 3 Strategic Goals Progress Update... 4 Ridership... 6 Revenue... 9 Expenses... 1 System Summary...
More informationSound Transit Operations January 2018 Service Performance Report. Ridership
January 218 Service Performance Report Ridership Total Boardings by Mode Jan-17 Jan-18 % YTD-17 YTD-18 % ST Express 1,3,33 1,7,91.3% 1,3,33 1,7,91.3% Sounder 367,33 416,8 13.3% 367,33 416,8 13.3% Tacoma
More informationList of Figures... 4 List of Maps... 6 Introduction... 7 Data Sources... 8
SERVICE EVALUATION APRIL 2014 Table of Contents List of Figures... 4 List of Maps... 6 Introduction... 7 Data Sources... 8 Service Overview and Service Fundamentals System Overview... 9 Service Area...
More informationSound Transit Operations March 2017 Service Performance Report. Ridership. Total Boardings by Mode
March 217 Service Performance Report Ridership ST Express Sounder Tacoma Link Link Paratransit Mar-16 Mar-17 % 1,83,4 1,621,49 2.4% 37,496 82,631 1,264,47 3,821 Total Boardings by Mode 389,98 87,39 1,89,43,297
More informationTRANSPORTATION SERVICE Actual
PERFORMANCE REPORT-THIRD QUARTER VISION TO DELIVER REGIONAL MULTI-MODAL TRANSPORTATION SERVICES AND INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS THAT SIGNIFICANTLY AND CONTINUALLY INCREASE TRANSIT MARKET SHARE. MISSION
More information2018 Service Changes Ada County
2018 Service Changes Ada County System Benefits 15 minute headways on State Street during peak hours o 30 minutes on Saturdays 30 minute headways on Emerald all day on weekdays More frequent and direct
More information(This page intentionally left blank.)
Executive Summary (This page intentionally left blank.) Executive Summary INTRODUCTION The Cache Valley Transit District (CVTD) contracted with the team of Transportation Consultants, Inc. () and Fehr
More informationMadison Metro Transit System
Madison Metro Transit System 1101 East Washington Avenue Madison, Wisconsin, 53703 Administrative Office: 608 266 4904 Fax: 608 267 8778 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Plan Commission Timothy Sobota, Transit Planner,
More information2015 Independence Day Travel Overview U.S. Intercity Bus Industry
2015 Independence Day Travel Overview U.S. Intercity Bus Industry Chaddick Institute for Metropolitan Development, DePaul University June 25, 2015 This Intercity Bus Briefing summarizes the Chaddick Institute
More informationAbout This Report GAUGE INDICATOR. Red. Orange. Green. Gold
ATTACHMENT A About This Report The Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) operates a countywide network of local, community, rail connector, and express bus routes serving over 6, bus stops. OCTA
More informationRevisions to Denied Boarding Compensation, Domestic Baggage Liability Limits, Office of the Secretary (OST), Department of Transportation (DOT).
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 05/27/2015 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2015-12789, and on FDsys.gov 4910-9X DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Office
More informationAll Door Boarding Title VI Service Fare Analysis. Appendix P.3
All Door Boarding Title VI Service Fare Analysis Appendix P.3 Metro Board Report Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority One Gateway Plaza 3rd Floor Board Room Los Angeles,
More informationWestern Placer County Transit Operators Short Range Transit Plan Updates FY to FY Project Update and Alternatives Discussion
Western Placer County Transit Operators Short Range Transit Plan Updates FY 2018-19 to FY 2024-25 Project Update and Alternatives Discussion Public Workshop Purpose Present various transit service, capital
More informationRevised December 17, 2002
SERVICE STANDARDS Revised December 17, 2002 Regional Transportation District 1600 Blake Street Denver, CO 80202 1 I. INTRODUCTION A. Overview RTD continually receives requests for changes to existing service
More information