Work Package 1: Final Project Report Appendix C: Analysis of the current situation in the Frankfurt TMA
|
|
- Basil Bates
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Work Package 1: Final Project Report Appendix C: Analysis of the current situation in the Frankfurt TMA First Assessment of the operational Limitations, Benefits & Applicability for a List of package I AS applications FALBALA Project Drafted by: Eric Vallauri Authorised by: Thierry Arino on ADDRESSEES: Francis Casaux (CARE/ASAS Manager), Mick Van Gool (CARE Manager), Bogdan Petricel (AGC Programme), Costas Tamvaclis (ADS Programme) COPY TO: CENA, DFS, EEC, NATS, UoG & Sofréavia Participants. Page C-1/43
2 RECORD OF CHANGES Issue Date Detail of changes.1 19 March 24 Proposed first issue April 24 Delivered version including comments received from partners IMPORTANT NOTE: ANY NEW VERSION SUPERSEDES THE PRECEDING VERSION, WHICH MUST BE DESTROYED OR CLEARLY MARKED ON THE FRONT PAGE WITH THE MENTION OBSOLETE VERSION Page C-2/43
3 TABLE OF CONTENTS C1. INTRODUCTION... 6 C1.1. SCOPE AND OBJECTIVES... 6 C1.2. SELECTED DAYS FOR DETAILED ANALYSIS... 6 C1.3. DOCUMENT OVERVIEW... 7 C2. OVERVIEW OF THE FRANKFURT APPROACH... 8 C2.1. GENERALITIES... 8 C2.2. TRAFFIC FLOWS... 9 C2.3. LANDING CONFIGURATION BREAKDOWN...1 C2.4. ARRIVAL PROCEDURES...11 C Introduction...11 C STAR...11 C GPS/FMS RNAV arrival routes...11 C ILS final approach...12 C Summary per landing configuration...12 C2.5. RUNWAYS...14 C2.6. FRANKFURT APPROACH ORGANISATION...15 C2.7. ARRIVAL MANAGER...16 C3. MAIN ARRIVAL CHARACTERISTICS...17 C3.1. MAJOR ARRIVAL FLOWS...17 C3.2. WHAT IS THE USE OF RADAR VECTORING IN E-TMA?...18 C3.3. WHAT IS THE ACTUAL USE OF THE IAFS?...2 C3.4. WHAT IS THE USE OF HOLDING PATTERNS IN APPROACH?...22 C3.5. WHAT IS THE USE OF RADAR VECTORING IN TMA?...25 C3.6. WHAT IS THE ORDERING OF AIRCRAFT IN THE LANDING SEQUENCE?...28 C3.7. WHAT IS THE SPACING BETWEEN SUCCESSIVE ARRIVALS?...3 C Introduction...3 C Easterly configuration...3 C Westerly configuration...34 C3.8. WHAT IS THE RUNWAY USE?...38 C Arrivals...38 C Departures...41 C Mix of arrivals and departures...42 Page C-3/43
4 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Number of movements per day at Frankfurt airport... 8 Figure 2: Traffic flows in Frankfurt TMA... 9 Figure 3: Number of arrival flights per day at Frankfurt airport... 1 Figure 4: Arrival procedures in the westerly configuration Figure 5: Arrival procedures in the easterly configuration Figure 6: Runways in EDDF Figure 7: Arrival flows to EDDF in the westerly configuration (22 July 6h-9h) Figure 8: Arrival flows to EDDF in the easterly configuration (4 August 6h-9h).. 18 Figure 9: Radar vectoring before the clearance limits (westerly configuration) Figure 1: Radar vectoring before the clearance limits (easterly configuration) Figure 11: Arrival flow breakdown per clearance limit... 2 Figure 12: Use of clearance limits depending on the landing configuration Figure 13: Use of ROKIM and EPINO depending on the landing configuration Figure 14: Breakdown of the number of orbits in holding patterns Figure 15: Number of orbits in holding patterns in easterly configuration Figure 16: Number of orbits in holding patterns in westerly configuration Figure 17: Time spent in holding patterns on 22 July Figure 18: Time spent in holding patterns on 19 July Figure 19: Radar vectoring after the clearance limits (westerly configuration) Figure 2: Radar vectoring after the clearance limits (easterly configuration) Figure 21: Trajectories to the final approach (westerly configuration) Figure 22: Trajectories to the final approach (easterly configuration) Figure 23: Snapshot at the final approach (westerly configuration) Figure 24: Snapshot at the final approach (easterly configuration) Figure 25: Time spacing between successive landings (easterly configuration) Figure 26: Spacing in time between successive landings per runway (19 July) Figure 27: Spacing in time between successive landings (19 July) Figure 28: Top of arrivals on runways 7L and 7R (19 July 6h-9h) Figure 29: Top of arrivals and departures on runways 7L and 7R (22 July 6h- 9h) Figure 3: Time spacing between successive landings (westerly configuration) Figure 31: Spacing in time between successive landings per runway (22 July) Figure 32: Spacing in time between successive landings (22 July 6h-9h) Figure 33: Top of arrivals on runways 25L and 25R (22 July 6h-9h) Figure 34: Top of arrivals and departures on runways 25L and 25R (22 July 6h- 9h) Figure 35: Arrivals per runways in the easterly configuration Figure 36: Arrivals per runways in the westerly configuration Figure 37: Arrival breakdown per runway Figure 38: Average number of arrivals per runway for both landing configurations Figure 39: Number of arrivals per hour and per runway at EDDF on 22 July (westerly configuration)... 4 Figure 4: Departures per runways in the easterly configuration Figure 41: Departures per runways in the westerly configuration Page C-4/43
5 Figure 42: Departure breakdown per runways Figure 43: Number of arrivals and departures per hour at EDDF on runways 25R and 25L on 22 July (westerly configuration) Page C-5/43
6 C1. INTRODUCTION C1.1. Scope and objectives This appendix presents the results of the analysis of the current situation in the Frankfurt TMA. It includes both a qualitative and a quantitative assessment of the main arrival traffic characteristics. It is based on the analysis of the German radar data and it also benefits of environment data and METAR information gathered in support to the radar data processing and analysis. The German radar data recordings have been processed to help identifying relevant traffic patterns and typical traffic situations for the airspace considered within the FALBALA study. The first task was focused on the understanding of the airspace structure, the traffic demand and ATC practices to handle traffic flows in the considered airspace. Besides, some operational indicators have been defined in the project to mainly support the quantitative assessment of both the current situation, and the potential improvements brought by the ASAS applications under investigation within the FALBALA study (not part of this analysis). When assessing the current situation, these operational indicators have been used as a framework for the definition of measurements performed on the radar data recordings. C1.2. Selected days for detailed analysis To illustrate the arrival traffic patterns in Frankfurt TMA and E-TMA, 2 days have been selected, one for each of the two configurations. METAR information extracted from [3] is shown below: Tuesday 22 July 23 for westerly configuration (25L/25R) Wind Visibility Ceiling QNH Page C-6/43
7 Monday 4 August 23 for easterly configuration (7L/7R) Wind Visibility Ceiling QNH Note: METAR is missing on the morning of 4 August but a look at the days before and after shows that the weather at that time was constant and very nice. The missing data can be considered as the same as the one for the afternoon. Visibility is good for both days despite some rain showers on 22 July. This is important as the control practices in EDDF for arrivals often involve visual clearances on final approach to reduce separation between successive aircraft on parallel axis and therefore to increase airport capacity. For clarity but also to have sufficient displayed data, a period of 3 hours has been selected in the busiest part of the day (i.e. 6h 9h). C1.3. Document overview Chapter C1 briefly introduces the scope and objectives of this Appendix. Chapter C2 is an overview of the Frankfurt TMA and E-TMA based on the environment data and illustrated with extracts from the German radar data recordings. Finally, chapter C3 discusses the main traffic characteristics in the Frankfurt TMA and E-TMA, using the traffic patterns extracted from the German radar data recordings and provides the quantitative results computed based on the operational indicators. Page C-7/43
8 C2. Overview of the Frankfurt Approach C2.1. Generalities The area of responsibility Frankfurt Approach includes the complete airspace C below FL1 and in addition to that the airspace C above FL1 up to FL115 within the lateral boundary of the first part. The maximum usable flight level is FL11 The Frankfurt FIR is above the Frankfurt Approach and goes up to FL245. The TMA includes one major airport, i.e. Frankfurt (EDDF). Frankfurt is ranked third in Europe in terms of aircraft movements per year (about 458 in 22). The airport is the main Lufthansa s hub. In 1999, 57.2% of the inbound traffic were Lufthansa s ones. The figure below shows the number of departures and arrivals per day in EDDF extracted during processing of the radar data recordings in the first step of the analysis. Arrivals Departures Number of mvts /7 21/7 23/7 25/7 27/7 29/7 31/7 2/8 4/8 6/8 8/8 1/8 12/8 14/8 16/8 18/8 2/8 22/8 24/8 Figure 1: Number of movements per day at Frankfurt airport Due to an undetermined reason in the radar data processing, about 25% of departures on runway 18 cannot be extracted after 15 August. The average number of movements in EDDF (without taking account the days with partial extraction of departures) is 1285 (with a standard deviation of 39). Page C-8/43
9 Appendix C: Analysis of the current situation in the Frankfurt TMA FALBALA/WP1/FPR/D Version 1.1 C2.2. Traffic flows The following figure illustrates the complexity of the Frankfurt TMA, with the mix of departures, arrivals and transits over a period of 3 hours in the morning (6h to 9h on 22 July 23). EDDF Level aircraft Climbing aircraft Descending aircraft Figure 2: Traffic flows in Frankfurt TMA The departure flows can be rather easily identified (blue). The arrival flows are more difficult to distinguish as the aircraft are either descending (red) or level (green). Nevertheless, some converging points can be identified as well as the approached, including the northern downwind leg, the base legs and the final approaches. Page C-9/43
10 C2.3. Landing configuration breakdown There are two main landing configurations in EDDF: easterly and westerly. The following figure shows the breakdown per day of the radar data recordings between the two landing configurations. East West 8 6 Number of arrivals /7 21/7 23/7 25/7 27/7 29/7 31/7 2/8 4/8 6/8 8/8 1/8 12/8 14/8 16/8 18/8 2/8 22/8 24/8 Figure 3: Number of arrival flights per day at Frankfurt airport Both landing configurations were experienced during the period of recordings, but with a predominance of the westerly configuration. The westerly configuration was applied 18 full days, whereas the easterly one was mainly applied 3 full days (there have been aircraft landing in the westerly configuration every day). Finally, a change in the landing configuration inducing at least 1% of arrivals in each configuration appears on 14 days. As a result, a large majority of the arrivals over the whole period of recordings occurred in the westerly configuration (74%). Page C-1/43
11 C2.4. Arrival procedures C Introduction C STAR Two types of arrival procedures are defined: STARs and RNAV. They all begin from one of the 4 clearance limits: EPINO ETARU GED (GEDERN) PSA (SPESSART) There are 2 STARs per clearance limit, i.e. one for each landing configuration (easterly and westerly). It means that 8 STARs are defined. There are 2 IAFS per landing configuration, one in the south and one in the north. The IAFs of the easterly configuration are: TAU (TAUNUS) RID (RIED) The IAFs of r the westerly configuration are: MTR (METRO) CHA (CHARLIE) There are no initial approaches defined from the IAFs to the ILS final approaches. C GPS/FMS RNAV arrival routes An alternative procedure to the STARs is the RNAV arrival routes. They are defined from each clearance limit to the beginning of the ILS final approach. They look like trombones. They are composed of a downwind leg, a base leg and a beginning of the final. The downwind legs and the beginning of the final include several navigation points (named DFxx), which are used to shorten the downwind leg thanks to vectors to the final. Some routes link the clearance limits to the downwind leg through either conventional navigation points (like the IAF) or RNAV navigation points (DFxx). Page C-11/43
12 C ILS final approach A pair of parallel runways is used for arrivals in EDDF (see following paragraph). There in one ILS final approach per runway of the pair (i.e. 4 different ILS final approaches). The final approach of the RNAV arrival routes splits into two routes to reach the Final Approach Fixes (FAF) of the two parallel final approaches: from DF51 to LOMPO and ROBSA in easterly configuration from DF21 to REDGO and LEDKI in the westerly configuration For both landing configurations, the final approaches are used independently of the origin of the traffic (e.g. traffic coming from the south can land on either the northern or the southern runway). The minimum separation value is 3 NM on final approach before the outer marker and then 2.5 NM during a CAT I ILS in IMC. As the runways are dependent, simultaneous parallel approaches cannot be performed. To optimise runway capacity, the strategy is to have spacing between arriving staggered aircraft (i.e. on the two parallel approaches) close to the minimum separation value and in case of sufficient weather conditions, aircraft are cleared to follow each other visually, leading to reduced separation and therefore higher traffic flow. The only constraint is that the aircraft behind may not pass the one in front. This practise is particularly effective since aircraft land on different runways and that therefore there is no constraint due to the runway occupancy time. C Summary per landing configuration The following figures show the arrival procedures for the westerly configuration (the preferred one, provided the tail wind component does not exceed 5 kts) and the easterly configuration. Page C-12/43
13 Clearance Limit IAF RNAV & ILS procedures STAR Figure 4: Arrival procedures in the westerly configuration Clearance Limit IAF RNAV & ILS procedures STAR Figure 5: Arrival procedures in the easterly configuration Page C-13/43
14 Although the lines are displayed in purple, it should be noted that the STARs and the RNAV arrival routes are actually overlapped (i.e. the black line is below the purple one) between PSA and CHA and between GED and either MTR in the westerly configuration or GEDSI in the easterly configuration. C2.5. Runways There are three runways in EDDF. a pair of runways (7/25) separated by 518 m, i.e. they are dependent; a runway 18 on the western side of the airport, beyond the runway 7 threshold. Runway 18 is only used for take-off. It enables a majority of the take-offs with a maximum rear wind of 15 kts. If the wind is stronger, runway 18 is closed and only the pair of runways is used. During the period of recording, runway 18 has never been closed and therefore it has enabled a majority of departures. The pair of runways is used for both take-off and landing. 7L/25R is dedicated to northbound departures only. There is an additional ILS in the middle of runway 25L with a specific lightning for a runway 26L (2 m long). The ILS glide is parallel to the 25R ILS but higher. Runway 26L is used in specific cases (i.e. heavy aircraft on 25R and lighter aircraft on 26L) with good weather conditions. No arrival on runway 26L has occurred during the period of recordings. The following figure shows the 3 runways with the departures and arrivals during 3 hours (i.e. from 6h to 9h on 22 July 23) in the westerly configuration for the pair of runways and runway 18. Page C-14/43
15 Figure 6: Runways in EDDF C2.6. Frankfurt Approach organisation The radar controller Pickup North (TR1) is responsible for IFR approaches coming from GED, ETARU and EPINO. The radar controller Pickup South (TR1S) is responsible for IFR approaches coming from PSA. The radar controller Feeder (TE1) is responsible for the turn onto the final and for the final. It is possible to have a second Feeder (TE2) The departure controller (TR3) is responsible for IFR departures going to north and east (RWY7). The second departure controller (TR2) is responsible for IFR departures going to south, south-east and west. Exception: The responsibility of TR3 includes departures to the west if all departures use RWY18. There are two co-ordinator positions: TC1 is co-ordinating approaches TC2 is co-ordinating departures. Page C-15/43
16 There are no fixed sectors. The work-sharing between Pickups and Feeder is flexible and depends on the load of traffic and on the team. C2.7. Arrival Manager There is an Arrival Manager (AMAN), named 4D-Planner, dedicated to Frankfurt ACC and Approach. The 4D Planner basic ideas are controller assistance for arrivals proposals for a dense and optimised landing sequence sequence should always reflect the actual traffic situation assignment of target times for metering fix and threshold controller advisories how to achieve the proposed sequence and target times The ACC controller monitors the Planning Display of the 4D-Planner and guides the aircraft movements by assigning headings, speeds and altitudes so that the handover to the Approach is at the planned time. At its expected time of delivery, each aircraft appears on the time scale as a label, containing the trend information represented by a coloured bar (red: too early, green: too late). The Approach controller will receive information about the planned runway and arrival time, and thus the sequence in which the aircraft will land. Page C-16/43
17 C3. Main arrival characteristics C3.1. Major arrival flows The following figures show the entire radar trajectories of the arrival traffic in EDDF extracted from the radar data from 6 am to 9 am on for the two selected days. Figure 7: Arrival flows to EDDF in the westerly configuration (22 July 6h-9h) Page C-17/43
18 Figure 8: Arrival flows to EDDF in the easterly configuration (4 August 6h-9h) The same major arrivals flows converging towards the clearance limits can be identified: 2 from the west to EPINO 1 from the north-west to ETARU 1 from the north and some traffic from the east to GED 1 from the south-east and 1 from the south to PSA In addition, it can be noted that: in the westerly a traffic coming from the south-west is directly integrating the southern downwind leg; In the easterly configuration, the flows from the west to EPINO merge about 3 NM before EPINO and not at EPINO or ROKIM as in the westerly configuration; the same short-haul flights coming from 4 different airports can be identified. In both figures. C3.2. What is the use of radar vectoring in E-TMA? The following figure shows a zoomed view of the arrival flows to illustrate the use of radar vectoring in E-TMA before the clearance limits. Page C-18/43
19 Radar Vectoring Figure 9: Radar vectoring before the clearance limits (westerly configuration) Radar Vectoring Figure 1: Radar vectoring before the clearance limits (easterly configuration) Page C-19/43
20 The dotted black ellipsoid highlights the radar vectoring applied by ATC for the merging at the clearance limits. C3.3. What is the actual use of the IAFs? As shown in the figures of the paragraph C3.2, the STARs from the clearance limits to the IAFs are not used. Therefore, the relevant points to study are the clearance limits and not the IAF (Note: this is actually a naming issue as the clearance limits are used exactly as IAFs in other TMA, e.g. for holding patterns). It can be noted that the actual merging point of the traffic flow coming from the west is ROKIM and not EPINO (it is particularly visible in the westerly configuration). The following figure shows the breakdown of arrivals flying over the clearance limits within a radius of 1.5 NM. For the western flows, ROKIM is used instead of EPINO. 4% 3% 2% 1% % GED PSA ROKIM ETARU None Figure 11: Arrival flow breakdown per clearance limit About 7% of the arrivals have flown over a clearance limit. PSA is the most important clearance limits in terms of arrival flows. This is likely linked with the fact that it is the only one located in the South of EDDF. The percentage of arrivals having flown over EPINO is half of the ones over ROKIM (13.4% vs. 6.6%). However, EPINO has been on average more often used during the 3 days where only the easterly configuration was applied (1%) than during the 18 days with the westerly configuration (6%). The following figure shows the arrival flow breakdown per clearance limits for days in only either the easterly or the westerly configuration. Page C-2/43
21 All East West 4% 3% 2% 1% % GED PSA ROKIM ETARU None Figure 12: Use of clearance limits depending on the landing configuration The only noticeable difference is the lower number of arrivals flying over ROKIM in the easterly configuration. The figure below summarises the use of ROKIM and EPINO depending on the landing configuration (Note: these averages have been computed on 18 days for the westerly configuration but on only 3 days for the easterly configuration.) East West 2% 15% 1% 5% % ROKIM EPINO Figure 13: Use of ROKIM and EPINO depending on the landing configuration Page C-21/43
22 C3.4. What is the use of holding patterns in approach? As shown in the figures of the paragraph C3.2, some arrivals are holding: first figure: one is holding in ETARU (westerly configuration) second figure: several are holding at ETARU, GED and EPINO (easterly configuration) In addition, it can be noted that some arrivals on the south-east traffic flow have performed a 36 turn for delaying. The figure below shows the number of orbits done per aircraft having flown over a clearance limit ( means that the aircraft has not been stacked). GED PSA EPINO ETARU 1% 8% 6% 4% 2% % >=4 Figure 14: Breakdown of the number of orbits in holding patterns About 8% of the aircraft having flown over GED, PSA and ETARU have not been stacked. This percentage is smaller for EPINO (64%). The average on the four clearance limits is 78%. It means that on the total period of radar recordings, only 15% of the arrivals (i.e. 22% of the 7% having flown over a clearance limit) have been stacked. Most of the stacked aircraft have done one orbit and very few have done more than two. The analysis of the use of holding patterns seems to depend on the landing configuration as illustrated by the figures below: Page C-22/43
23 GED PSA EPINO ETARU 1% 8% 6% 4% 2% % >=4 Figure 15: Number of orbits in holding patterns in easterly configuration GED PSA EPINO ETARU 1% 8% 6% 4% 2% % >=4 Figure 16: Number of orbits in holding patterns in westerly configuration The results for the westerly configurations are similar to the average values. However, in the easterly configuration, a significant larger number of aircraft, except in PSA, have been stacked, especially in EPINO where 5% of arrivals have been stacked. This result is to be linked with the higher proportion of arrivals having flown over EPINO in the easterly configuration. The figures of the paragraph C3.2 confirm the greater number of stacked aircraft in the easterly configuration. Nevertheless, the figures for the easterly configuration should be taken carefully as they are computed on only 3 days. Page C-23/43
24 On average on the full radar data recordings, the stacked aircraft have spent about 9 minutes in the holding patterns. The following figures provide some information about the time spent in holding patterns for two days with significantly different characteristics: 22 July: westerly configuration and limited use of holding patterns (11% of flights having flown over a clearance limit) 19 July: easterly configuration and significant use of holding patterns (45% of flights having flown over a clearance limit) GED PSA Average Minimum Maximum Figure 17: Time spent in holding patterns on 22 July GED PSA EPINO Average Minimum Maximum Figure 18: Time spent in holding patterns on 19 July The values for holding patterns in PSA on both days are similar, like between the three holding patterns on 19 July. Page C-24/43
25 C3.5. What is the use of radar vectoring in TMA? The following figure shows a zoomed view of the arrival flows to illustrate the use of radar vectoring TMA after the clearance limits. Radar Vectoring Figure 19: Radar vectoring after the clearance limits (westerly configuration) Page C-25/43
26 Radar Vectoring Figure 2: Radar vectoring after the clearance limits (easterly configuration) The dotted black ellipsoid highlights the radar vectoring applied by ATC from the clearance limits to the base leg. In each landing configuration, radar vectoring is mainly used from the clearance limits close to the final approach (e.g. PSA in the westerly configuration). Globally, more arrivals seem to follow the RNAV arrival routes in the easterly configuration. Note: non-rnav aircraft are radar vectored all way long from the clearance limits to the final approaches. Due to the position of the clearance limits, the arrivals coming from the west, north and east are going to the northern downwind leg. It induces two successive mergings, performed with radar vectoring: In the easterly configuration, there is a first merging between traffic from EPINO/ROKIM and from ETARU, and then the controller has to integrate arrivals from GED. In the westerly configuration, there is a first merging between traffic from GED and from ETARU, and then the controller has to integrate arrivals from ROKIM. It can also be noted that in the easterly configuration, some of the traffic coming from EPINO/ROKIM and from ETARU are actually flying towards the southern downwind leg passing above traffic on short final approach (dotted purple box). The following figure shows a zoomed view of the arrival trajectories close to the final approach. Page C-26/43
27 Appendix C: Analysis of the current situation in the Frankfurt TMA FALBALA/WP1/FPR/D Version 1.1 Figure 21: Trajectories to the final approach (westerly configuration) Figure 22: Trajectories to the final approach (easterly configuration) Page C-27/43
28 These figures show that arrivals are not turning to the final approach exactly on the RNAV points of the downwind leg. Aircraft are vectored to intercept the ILS between the FAF (shortest trajectory) and the extremity of the beginning of the RNAV final approach. (Note: one has intercepted the 7L ILS between the FAF and the runway threshold) In addition, it can be noted that: aircraft are intercepting the ILS localizer before the FAF, still on the RNAV arrival route whereas the route is supposed to separate itself into two parallel approaches just before the FAFs a few aircraft have started a 7R ILS procedure but have moved to the 7L ILS about 4 to 5 NM before the runway threshold (dotted purple box) in the easterly configuration, a traffic on the northern downwind leg has performed a 36 turn for delaying (dotted purple ellipsoid) C3.6. What is the ordering of aircraft in the landing sequence? The following figure shows a zoomed view of the arrival flows in the westerly configuration to illustrate the use of radar vectoring and the ordering of aircraft. It also highlights the staggered approaches. The length of the trajectories is 6 seconds Figure 23: Snapshot at the final approach (westerly configuration) Page C-28/43
29 There are 1 arrivals displayed on this figure: 1 has just landed on 25L 2, 3 and 4 are on the ILS procedures, respectively 25R, 25R and 25R (Note: 3 is changing from 25L to 25R) 5 is intercepting the 25L ILS localizer at the FAF from the northern downwind leg, between 4 and 6, which is also on the 25R ILS localizer 7 and 8 are following each other (and previously 6) from the south clearance limit (PSA) to intercept respectively the 25L and 25R ILS localizer 9 is leaving the southern RNAV arrival route and is vectored for a future 25L ILS procedure 1 is on the northern downwind leg and will be vectored to intercept the 25R ILS localizer behind 9 This time, the following figure shows a zoomed view of the arrival flows in the easterly configuration. The length of the trajectories is also 6 seconds. 11 1n n s 9s Figure 24: Snapshot at the final approach (easterly configuration) There are 11 arrivals displayed on this figure: 1 has just landed on 7L Page C-29/43
30 2, 3, 4 and 5 are on the ILS procedures, respectively 7R, 7L, 7R and 7L, the separation between them is about 1 minute 6 is on the 7R ILS localizer before the FAF 7 is intercepting the 7L ILS localizer from the southern downwind leg behind 6 8 is intercepting the 7R ILS localizer from the northern downwind leg, close behind 7 9s and 9n are in the first position on the (respectively southern and northern) downwind leg, 1s and 1n being in the second position 11 is on the northern RNAV arrival route C3.7. What is the spacing between successive arrivals? C Introduction The following table provides the ICAO wake vortex radar separation minima in distance between successive arrivals according to the aircraft wake vortex categories (i.e. H: Heavy, M: Medium, L: Light) and the estimated spacing in time based on a 15 kt ground speed. Preceding aircraft Succeeding aircraft ICAO wake vortex radar separation minima Distance (NM) Estimated time (sec) H H 4 96 H M 5 12 H L M L 5 12 The aircraft spacing is achieved in terms of distance. The spacing in terms of time varies according to the strength of the headwind. For example, assuming a constant IAS of 15 kts, a 3 NM spacing with nil headwind represents a 72 second spacing. With a 3 kts headwind, the same 3 NM spacing corresponds to a 9 second spacing. It is the spacing in terms of distance that controllers implement. Variation in timespacing in the following figures of this section is partly a function of varying wind conditions on different days C Easterly configuration The following figures show the breakdown of aircraft spacing in time between successive landings on the same runway in the easterly configuration. Page C-3/43
31 Runway 7L < >=24 Runway 7R < >=24 Figure 25: Time spacing between successive landings (easterly configuration) There is no peak around the values listed in the table above. For both runways the maximum is reached for spacing values between 15 and 17 seconds. This is due to the staggered approaches performed in EDDF. As a result, the spacing between two successive aircraft on the same runway can be about twice the wake vortex radar separation minimum. To illustrate these spacing values on one particular day, the following figure shows the results of the computation performed on all arrivals on 19 July (Note: 4 August does not enable to compute statistics on the whole day since there has been a change of landing configuration in the afternoon). Page C-31/43
32 RW7L RW7R RW25L RW25R < >=24 Figure 26: Spacing in time between successive landings per runway (19 July) No significant difference can be identified by comparison with the overall breakdown. The following figure shows the variation of the time spacing between aircraft on 19 July during a period of three hours (6h to 9h) of dense arrival traffic. RW7R RW7L : 6:3 7: 7:3 8: 8:3 Figure 27: Spacing in time between successive landings (19 July) Page C-32/43
33 Some large spacing values can be identified, in particular on runway 7R. In addition, there has been no landing during about 2 minutes (i.e. from 8: to 8:2). To illustrate the staggered approaches, the following figure shows the top of arrivals on runways 7L and 7R during these three hours. RW7R RW7L 1 6: 6:3 7: 7:3 8: 8:3-1 Figure 28: Top of arrivals on runways 7L and 7R (19 July 6h-9h) The figure shows a similar number of arrivals on runways 7L and 7R. It also shows the staggered approaches. However to have a complete picture of the use of the pair of runways and to better understand its complexity, it is also necessary to include the departures, as shown by the figure below. RW7R (arr) RW7L (arr) RW7R (dep) RW7L (dep),5 6: 6:3 7: 7:3 8: 8:3 -,5 Figure 29: Top of arrivals and departures on runways 7L and 7R (22 July 6h- 9h) Page C-33/43
34 C Westerly configuration The following figures show the breakdown of aircraft spacing in time between successive landings on the same runway in the westerly configuration. Runway 25L < >=24 Runway 25R < >=24 Figure 3: Time spacing between successive landings (westerly configuration) Page C-34/43
35 The results for runway 25L are similar to the ones in the easterly configuration. The only significant difference is the number of arrivals is the higher number of spacing values greater than 24 seconds. For runway 25R, there is a greater proportion of spacing values lower than 9 seconds. They likely correspond to successive landings on the same runway, and not on the parallel one. To illustrate these spacing values on one particular day, the following figure shows the results of the computation performed on all arrivals on 22 July RW7L RW7R RW25L RW25R < >=24 Figure 31: Spacing in time between successive landings per runway (22 July) No significant difference can be identified by comparison with the overall breakdown. The following figure shows the variation of the time spacing between aircraft during a period of three hours (6h to 9h) of dense arrival traffic on 22 July. Page C-35/43
36 RW25L RW25R : 6:3 7: 7:3 8: 8:3 Figure 32: Spacing in time between successive landings (22 July 6h-9h) The results are very different between the two runways. The spacing values are much more regular on runway 25R (i.e. between 6 and 18 s except between 7:3 and 8:3). It can be surprising since this runway is the one mainly used for take-offs in the westerly configuration (in addition to runway 18). It means that the total of movements on runway 25R is much greater than on 25L. (respectively 19 vs. 5 during these three hours) One explanation is that runway 25R is closer to the terminal and therefore is preferred so as to reduce taxiing time. To illustrate the staggered approaches, the following figure shows the top of arrivals on runways 25L and 25R during these three hours. Page C-36/43
37 RW25L RW25R 1 6: 6:3 7: 7:3 8: 8:3-1 Figure 33: Top of arrivals on runways 25L and 25R (22 July 6h-9h) The figure shows a greater number of arrivals on runway 25R. It also shows the staggered approaches. For instance, it is clearly visible for the arrivals on runway 25L at 6:15 or between 8: and 8:3. However to have a complete picture of the use of the pair of runways and to better understand its complexity, it is also necessary to include the departures, as shown by the figure below. R W2 5 L ( a r r ) R W2 5 R ( a r r ) R W2 5 L ( de p) R W2 5 R ( de p ),5 6: 6:3 7: 7:3 8: 8:3 -,5 Figure 34: Top of arrivals and departures on runways 25L and 25R (22 July 6h- 9h) Page C-37/43
38 C3.8. What is the runway use? C Arrivals The figure below shows the number of arrivals identified in the radar data recordings in each landing configuration. RW7L RW7R /7 21/7 23/7 25/7 27/7 29/7 31/7 2/8 4/8 6/8 8/8 1/8 12/8 14/8 16/8 18/8 2/8 22/8 24/8 Figure 35: Arrivals per runways in the easterly configuration RW25L RW25R /7 21/7 23/7 25/7 27/7 29/7 31/7 2/8 4/8 6/8 8/8 1/8 12/8 14/8 16/8 18/8 2/8 22/8 24/8 Figure 36: Arrivals per runways in the westerly configuration Page C-38/43
39 To illustrate the use of the runways, the following figure shows the percentage of arrivals per runway in EDDF over the whole period of recordings. RW7R 13% RW7L 13% RW25L 32% RW25R 42% Figure 37: Arrival breakdown per runway The figure confirms that the westerly configuration is the most common one (74%) in this period of time. It also shows that, whereas there is the same proportion of landings in 7R and 7L on the easterly configuration, 25R is more often used than 25L on the westerly configuration. The following figures present the average number of arrivals per runway computed on the days with only one landing configuration (i.e. 3 days for the easterly one and 18 days for the westerly one). Easterly configuration Westerly configuration RW7L RW7R RW25L RW25R Figure 38: Average number of arrivals per runway for both landing configurations Page C-39/43
40 The following figure presents the number of arrivals per hour and per runway on the selected day in the westerly configuration, i.e. 22 July 23. Arrivals 25R Arrivals 25L h 2h 3h 4h 5h 6h 7h 8h 9h 1h 11h 12h 13h 14h 15h 16h 17h 18h 19h 2h 21h 22h 23h 24h -2-3 Figure 39: Number of arrivals per hour and per runway at EDDF on 22 July (westerly configuration) This figure confirms that runway 25R is more often use than runway 25L. In particular the average of arrivals per hour is greater and there are more values greater than 2 per hour. Nevertheless, on this selected day, the period of use of runway 25L is greater than runway 25R. In addition, it can be noticed that there is no arrival during the night. Page C-4/43
41 C Departures The figure below shows the number of departures identified in the radar data recordings in each landing configuration (all departures from runway 18 are shown). RW7L RW7R RW /7 21/7 23/7 25/7 27/7 29/7 31/7 2/8 4/8 6/8 8/8 1/8 12/8 14/8 16/8 18/8 2/8 22/8 24/8 Figure 4: Departures per runways in the easterly configuration RW25L RW25R RW /7 21/7 23/7 25/7 27/7 29/7 31/7 2/8 4/8 6/8 8/8 1/8 12/8 14/8 16/8 18/8 2/8 22/8 24/8 Figure 41: Departures per runways in the westerly configuration The number of departures on runway 18 is almost constant over the period where they could be correctly extracted from the radar data. On average, there were 382 departures per day (standard deviation=22). Page C-41/43
42 The figure below shows the percentage of departures per runway for the days with the full detection of departures on runway 18 (i.e. up to 15 August). RW25L 3% RW25R 27% RW18 59% RW7L 9% RW7R 2% Figure 42: Departure breakdown per runways It shows that 59% of the identified departures were from runway 18. It also confirms the greater number of departures on the northern runway (i.e. 7L/25R), especially in the westerly configuration. Runway 25R is already much more often used than 25L for arrivals. C Mix of arrivals and departures The following figures present the number of arrivals and departures per hour on runways 25R and 25L on the selected day in the westerly configuration, i.e. 22 July 23 Since the objective is to illustrate the mix of arrivals and departures on the runway use, runway 18, which is dedicated to departures only, is therefore not considered in this figure. Page C-42/43
43 Arrivals Departures h 2h 3h 4h 5h 6h 7h 8h 9h 1h 11h 12h 13h 14h 15h 16h 17h 18h 19h 2h 21h 22h 23h 24h -2-3 Runw ay 25R Arrivals Departures h 1-2h 2-3h 3-4h 4-5h 5-6h 6-7h 7-8h 8-9h 9-1h 1-11h 11-12h 12-13h 13-14h 14-15h 15-16h 16-17h 17-18h 18-19h 19-2h 2-21h 21-22h 22-23h 23-24h -2-3 Runw ay 25L Figure 43: Number of arrivals and departures per hour at EDDF on runways 25R and 25L on 22 July (westerly configuration) This figure clearly confirms that runway 25R is much more used than runway 25L, in particular in terms of departures. *** END OF DOCUMENT *** Page C-43/43
FALBALA Final Project Report
FALBALA Final Project Report First Assessment of the operational Limitations, Benefits & Applicability for a List of package I AS applications FALBALA Project Drafted by: Beatrice Raynaud Authorised by:
More informationAppendix B Ultimate Airport Capacity and Delay Simulation Modeling Analysis
Appendix B ULTIMATE AIRPORT CAPACITY & DELAY SIMULATION MODELING ANALYSIS B TABLE OF CONTENTS EXHIBITS TABLES B.1 Introduction... 1 B.2 Simulation Modeling Assumption and Methodology... 4 B.2.1 Runway
More informationApplication of Wake Turbulence Separation at London Heathrow. Paul Johnson Development Manager NATS Heathrow
Application of Wake Turbulence Separation at London Heathrow Paul Johnson Development Manager NATS Heathrow Heathrow Vital Statistics Passengers per year 67 Million Aircraft movements per year 470,000
More informationPBN AIRSPACE CONCEPT WORKSHOP. SIDs/STARs/HOLDS. Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) ICAO Doc 9931
International Civil Aviation Organization PBN AIRSPACE CONCEPT WORKSHOP SIDs/STARs/HOLDS Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) ICAO Doc 9931 Design in context Methodology STEPS TFC Where does the traffic
More informationTHE AREA CONTROL CENTRE (CTR) POSITION
THE AREA CONTROL CENTRE (CTR) POSITION 1. Introduction The Area Control Centre (ACC) also known as en-route controller and called CTR on IVAO, has the responsibility of ensuring Air Traffic Control (ATC)
More informationDesign Airspace (Routes, Approaches and Holds) Module 11 Activity 7. European Airspace Concept Workshops for PBN Implementation
Design Airspace (Routes, Approaches and Holds) Module 11 Activity 7 European Airspace Concept Workshops for PBN Implementation Design in Context TFC Where does the traffic come from? And when? RWY Which
More informationIVAO Switzerland Division
IVAO ATC Operations Zurich Tower Date Updated by Update description 08.01.2016 CH-TC Document Creation 30.10.2017 CH-AOC Document Revision 1 Contents 1-Objective... 3 2-Zurich Tower LSZH_TWR... 4 3-Operating
More informationChapter 6. Nonradar. Section 1. General DISTANCE
12/10/15 JO 7110.65W Chapter 6. Nonradar Section 1. General 6 1 1. DISTANCE Use mileage based (DME and/or ATD) procedures and minima only when direct pilot/controller communications are maintained. FIG
More informationIFR SEPARATION USING RADAR
IFR SEPARATION USING RADAR 1. Introduction When flying IFR inside controlled airspace, air traffic controllers either providing a service to an aircraft under their control or to another controller s traffic,
More informationUSE OF RADAR IN THE APPROACH CONTROL SERVICE
USE OF RADAR IN THE APPROACH CONTROL SERVICE 1. Introduction The indications presented on the ATS surveillance system named radar may be used to perform the aerodrome, approach and en-route control service:
More informationIRISH AVIATION AUTHORITY DUBLIN POINT MERGE. Presented by James O Sullivan PANS-OPS & AIRSPACE INSPECTOR Irish Aviation Authority
IRISH AVIATION AUTHORITY DUBLIN POINT MERGE Presented by James O Sullivan PANS-OPS & AIRSPACE INSPECTOR Irish Aviation Authority 2012 Holding Holding Before Point Merge No Pilot anticipation of distance
More informationChapter 6. Airports Authority of India Manual of Air Traffic Services Part 1
Chapter 6 6.1 ESSENTIAL LOCAL TRAFFIC 6.1.1 Information on essential local traffic known to the controller shall be transmitted without delay to departing and arriving aircraft concerned. Note 1. Essential
More informationSECTION 4 - APPROACH CONTROL PROCEDURES
SECTION 4 - APPROACH CONTROL PROCEDURES CHAPTER 1 - PROVISION OF SERVICES 1.1 An approach control unit shall provide:- a) Approach control service. b) Flight Information service. c) Alerting service. RESPONSIBILITIES
More informationSECTION 6 - SEPARATION STANDARDS
SECTION 6 - SEPARATION STANDARDS CHAPTER 1 - PROVISION OF STANDARD SEPARATION 1.1 Standard vertical or horizontal separation shall be provided between: a) All flights in Class A airspace. b) IFR flights
More informationLFPG / Paris-Charles de Gaulle / CDG
This page is intended to draw commercial and private pilots attention to the aeronautical context and main threats related to an aerodrome. They have been identified in a collaborative way by the main
More informationS2 Tower Controller. Allama Iqbal Int l Airport Lahore ( OPLA ) June 2016 Pakistan vacc
S2 Tower Controller Allama Iqbal Int l Airport Lahore ( OPLA ) June 2016 Pakistan vacc Introduction: The next stage in your controlling at Lahore as a tower controller is S2 rating. To be an S2 Controller
More informationKeywords: Advanced Continuous Descent Approach, CDA, CORADA, RTA, Arrival Management
26 TH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF THE AERONAUTICAL SCIENCES ENABLING TECHNOLOGY EVALUATION FOR EFFICIENT CONTINUOUS DESCENT APPROACHES R.J. de Muynck, L. Verhoeff, R.P.M. Verhoeven, N. de Gelder National
More informationAirfield Capacity Prof. Amedeo Odoni
Airfield Capacity Prof. Amedeo Odoni Istanbul Technical University Air Transportation Management M.Sc. Program Air Transportation Systems and Infrastructure Module 10 May 27, 2015 Airfield Capacity Objective:
More informationCHAPTER 5 SEPARATION METHODS AND MINIMA
CHAPTER 5 SEPARATION METHODS AND MINIMA 5.1 Provision for the separation of controlled traffic 5.1.1 Vertical or horizontal separation shall be provided: a) between IFR flights in Class D and E airspaces
More informationSafety and Airspace Regulation Group
Safety and Airspace Regulation Group 24 August 2015 Policy Statement POLICY FOR POINT MERGE AND TROMBONE TRANSITION PROCEDURES 1 Introduction 1.1 The Point Merge transition procedure is an Area Navigation
More informationOPERATIONAL SAFETY STUDY
OPERATIONAL SAFETY STUDY MAC TMA & CTR Incidents in Europe Edition No : 1.0 Edition Validity Date : 11.10.2018 MAC TMA & CTR Incidents in Europe Safety Functions Maps Analysis 2014 2016 data sample Edition
More informationDate: 01 Jun 2018 Time: 0959Z Position: 5121N 00048W Location: 6nm N Farnborough
AIRPROX REPORT No 2018103 Date: 01 Jun 2018 Time: 0959Z Position: 5121N 00048W Location: 6nm N Farnborough PART A: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION REPORTED TO UKAB Recorded Aircraft 1 Aircraft 2 Aircraft DA62 BE90
More informationChallenges in Complex Procedure Design Validation
Challenges in Complex Procedure Design Validation Frank Musmann, Aerodata AG ICAO Workshop Seminar Aug. 2016 Aerodata AG 1 Procedure Validation Any new or modified Instrument Flight Procedure is required
More informationAnalysis of Operational Impacts of Continuous Descent Arrivals (CDA) using runwaysimulator
Analysis of Operational Impacts of Continuous Descent Arrivals (CDA) using runwaysimulator Camille Shiotsuki Dr. Gene C. Lin Ed Hahn December 5, 2007 Outline Background Objective and Scope Study Approach
More informationWakeNet3-Europe Concepts Workshop
WakeNet3-Europe Concepts Workshop Benefits of Conditional Reduction of Wake Turbulence Separation Minima London, 09.02.2011 Jens Konopka (jens.konopka@dfs.de) DFS Deutsche Flugsicherung GmbH 2 Outline
More informationSULAYMANIYAH INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT MATS CHAPTER 11
KURDISTAN REGIONAL GOVERNMENT SULAYMANIYAH INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT MATS CHAPTER 11 SEPARATION STANDARDS & APPLICATIONS International and Local Procedures ( First Edition ) April 2012 Ff Prepared By Fakhir.F.
More informationNETWORK MANAGER - SISG SAFETY STUDY
NETWORK MANAGER - SISG SAFETY STUDY "Runway Incursion Serious Incidents & Accidents - SAFMAP analysis of - data sample" Edition Number Edition Validity Date :. : APRIL 7 Runway Incursion Serious Incidents
More informationNav Specs and Procedure Design Module 12 Activities 8 and 10. European Airspace Concept Workshops for PBN Implementation
Nav Specs and Procedure Design Module 12 Activities 8 and 10 European Airspace Concept Workshops for PBN Implementation Learning Objectives By the end of this presentation you should understand: The different
More informationSection 5. Radar Separation
7/24/14 JO 7110.65V CHG 1 4/3/14 JO 7110.65V Section 5. 5 5 1. APPLICATION a. Radar separation must be applied to all RNAV aircraft operating at and below FL450 on Q routes or random RNAV routes, excluding
More informationDate: 29 Jun 2018 Time: 1502Z Position: 5325N 00312W Location: 5nm NW Liverpool Airport
AIRPROX REPORT No 2018158 Date: 29 Jun 2018 Time: 1502Z Position: 5325N 00312W Location: 5nm NW Liverpool Airport PART A: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION REPORTED TO UKAB Recorded Aircraft 1 Aircraft 2 Aircraft
More informationATMM. Air Traffic Management Manual. Air Traffic Management Manual VACC AUSTRIA LOVV ATMM Air Traffic Management Manual
ATMM Version 2.2 Issued at 2013-07-01 Effective from 2013-07-05 page 1/15 NOT FOR REAL NAVIGATION 2013-07-01 / PH Content 0. Updates 4 0.1. New items 4 0.2. Updated items 4 0.3. Deleted items 4 1. LOWW_GND
More informationLFMN / Nice Côte-d Azur / NCE
This page is intended to draw commercial and private pilots attention to the aeronautical context and main threats related to an aerodrome. They have been identified in a collaborative way by the main
More informationDubai contest LIDAR in Dubai DANS Wake Vortex campaign DXB Operations Dependent Diagonal Approach implementation Phase RPAT Approach concept
DANS LIDAR wake vortex data campaign, deployment of Dependent Diagonal approaches and ongoing work to prepare RNP Parallel Approach Transition (RPAT) concept for implementation Roberto Ghidini Dubai contest
More informationOrientation Booklet The New Airline Chart Series
Orientation Booklet The New Airline Chart Series Copyright 2007 Jeppesen. All rights reserved. Table of Contents Introduction...1 Approach Chart...2 Heading...2 Plan View...2 Profile View... Minimums...
More informationAIRPROX REPORT No Date/Time: 27 Aug Z. (5nm NE Coventry Airport) Airspace: London FIR (Class: G)
AIRPROX REPORT No 2013123 Date/Time: 27 Aug 2013 1452Z Position: 5225N 00122W (5nm NE Coventry Airport) Airspace: London FIR (Class: G) Reporting Ac Type: ATP C172 Reported Ac Operator: CAT Civ Pte Alt/FL:
More information1.2 An Approach Control Unit Shall Provide the following services: c) Alerting Service and assistance to organizations involved in SAR Actions;
Section 4 Chapter 1 Approach Control Services Approach Control Note: This section should be read in conjunction with Section 2 (General ATS), Section 6 (Separation Methods and Minima) and Section 7 (ATS
More informationFLIGHT STRIP MANAGEMENT - APPROACH LEVEL
FLIGHT STRIP MANAGEMENT - APPROACH LEVEL 1. Introduction The flight strip management for ATC is an important point in order to ensure aircraft management and improve safety when controlling. In real aviation,
More informationIFR SEPARATION WITHOUT RADAR
1. Introduction IFR SEPARATION WITHOUT RADAR When flying IFR inside controlled airspace, air traffic controllers either providing a service to an aircraft under their control or to another controller s
More informationConsiderations for. RNP to xls. Operations. Juergen Ruppert. Regional Director Air Traffic Optimisation Services GE Aviation
Considerations for RNP to xls Operations Juergen Ruppert Regional Director Air Traffic Optimisation Services GE Aviation RNP to ILS 2 Content Why RNP to XLS What is the technology How does it work now?
More informationCurrent practice of separation delivery at major European airports ATM R&D Seminar, June 2015, Lisbon
Current practice of separation delivery at major European airports ATM R&D Seminar, June 2015, Lisbon Gerben van Baren (NLR) vanbaren@nlr.nl Catherine Chalon Morgan (Eurocontrol) Vincent Treve (Eurocontrol)
More informationINTERNATIONAL VIRTUAL AVIATION ORGANISATION CANADIAN AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL PHRASEOLOGY ATC OPERATIONS DECEMBER 2016 BY: MATHIEU LAFLAMME
INTERNATIONAL VIRTUAL AVIATION ORGANISATION CANADIAN AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL PHRASEOLOGY ATC OPERATIONS DECEMBER 2016!1 GENERAL Proper use of phraseology is one of the most important thing in aviation and
More informationThe aim of any instrument approach is to allow the aircraft to safely descend to a low altitude in order to become visual.
INSTRUMENT APPROACH CHARTS "An instrument approach is just a series of straight lines joined by rate one turns" Ron Magrath The aim of any instrument approach is to allow the aircraft to safely descend
More informationBurlington ATCT Standard Operating Procedures
This air traffic control procedural document is provided for virtual air traffic control in the ZBW ARTCC of the VATSIM network only. It is not for real-world ATC use. These procedures are approved for
More informationSafety / Performance Criteria Agreeing Assumptions Module 10 - Activities 5 & 6
Safety / Performance Criteria Agreeing Assumptions Module 10 - Activities 5 & 6 European Airspace Concept Workshops for PBN Implementation Why have safety and performance criteria? Measure performance
More informationLetter of Agreement. between. and
Munich FIR (EDMM) IVAO Germany 1 Document purpose Letter of Agreement between and Zürich FIR (LSAZ) IVAO Switzerland Effective: 02-APR-2015 Edition: 1.1 The purpose of this Letter of Agreement is to define
More informationAir Traffic Flow Management (ATFM) in the SAM Region METHODOLOGY ADOPTED BY BRAZIL TO CALCULATE THE CONTROL CAPACITY OF ACC OF BRAZILIAN FIR
International Civil Aviation Organization SAM/IG/6-IP/03 South American Regional Office 21/09/10 Sixth Workshop/Meeting of the SAM Implementation Group (SAM/IG/6) - Regional Project RLA/06/901 Lima, Peru,
More informationWAKE TURBULENCE SEPARATION MINIMA
1. Definition WAKE TURBULENCE SEPARATION MINIMA Wake turbulence is turbulence that forms behind an aircraft as it passes through the air, causing wingtip vortices. 2. Radar wake turbulence separation minima
More informationTHE TOWER CONTROL POSITION (TWR)
1. Introduction THE TOWER CONTROL POSITION (TWR) The Aerodrome Local Control, or Tower (called TWR) controller has the responsibility of ensuring Air Traffic Control (ATC) Services within a restricted
More informationAtlanta NextGen PBN Activities
Atlanta NextGen PBN Activities Presentation to: Name: Date: EWG Ops SC Meeting Jim Arrighi RNAV/RNP Group Jim Allerdice A80 May 18, 2010 0 0 Atlanta Performance Based Navigation Project Planning Seven
More informationPoint Merge & RECAT-EU at Leipzig-Halle Airport (EDDP) DFS Center Munich
Point Merge & RECAT-EU at Leipzig-Halle Airport (EDDP) DFS Center Munich Content Aerodrome Layout Arrival Restrictions Former Transition to Final Point Merge System RECAT-EU Aerodrome Layout Almost all
More informationINTERNATIONAL FEDERATION OF AIR TRAFFIC CONTROLLERS ASSOCIATIONS. Agenda Item: B.5.12 IFATCA 09 WP No. 94
INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION OF AIR TRAFFIC CONTROLLERS ASSOCIATIONS 48 th ANNUAL CONFERENCE - Dubrovnik, 20 th to 24 th April 2009 Agenda Item: B.5.12 IFATCA 09 WP No. 94 Study Go Around Procedures When on
More informationREAL-TIME SIMULATION STUDIES CONCERNING THE OPERATIONAL ASPECTS OF TWO LANDING THRESHOLDS ON ONE RUNWAY AT FRANKFURT/M
25 TH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF THE AERONAUTICAL SCIENCES REAL-TIME SIMULATION STUDIES CONCERNING THE OPERATIONAL ASPECTS OF TWO LANDING THRESHOLDS ON ONE RUNWAY AT FRANKFURT/M M. Huhnold*, A. Kulikow*,
More informationSOURDINE II EU- 5FW project on Noise Abatement Procedures. Overall view. Ruud den Boer / Collin Beers Department: ATM & Airports
SOURDINE II EU- 5FW project on Noise Abatement Procedures Overall view Ruud den Boer / Collin Beers Department: ATM & Airports Study of key elements weighed key elements 4th Framework Programme Definition
More informationVATSIM JORDAN vacc QUICK REFERENCE HANDBOOK QUICK REFERENCE - STANDARD FORMATS FOR COMMUNICATION
VATSIM JORDAN vacc QUICK REFERENCE HANDBOOK QUICK REFERENCE - STANDARD FORMATS FOR COMMUNICATION Clearance Delivery [CALLSIGN], YOU ARE CLEARED TO [DESTINATION] VIA [INSTRUCTION-1], THEN [ANOTHER INSTRUCTION
More informationNATS LTD. - IN CONFIDENCE
ACS Report 0908 TERMS AND DEFINITIONS USED IN AIRPORT CAPACITY STUDIES Edited version of document for ACL reference 21-09-2010 Airport Capacity Studies Operational Analysis NATS Ltd. ACS REPORT 0908 TERMS
More informationController Training Case Study Implementation of new RNP AR APCH for RWY07 (North Circuit) at HKIA
Controller Training Case Study Implementation of new RNP AR APCH for RWY07 (North Circuit) at HKIA Disclaimer This presentation is for information purposes only. It should not be relied on as the sole
More informationAREA NAVIGATION RNAV- MANAGEMENT
1. Introduction AREA NAVIGATION RNAV- MANAGEMENT RNAV is an instrument-based navigation method that leads to fly from a fix (geographic point inside an airspace) to another fix directly. Contrary to conventional
More informationCONTROLLED AIRSPACE CONTAINMENT POLICY
Safety and Airspace Regulation Group (SARG) 17 January 2014 Policy Statement 1 Overview CONTROLLED AIRSPACE CONTAINMENT POLICY 1.1 UK airspace design policy for ATS Routes, SIDs and STARs is based upon
More informationEnhanced Time Based Separation
Enhanced Time Based Separation (etbs) Enhanced Time Based Separation (etbs) Evolving TBS from SESAR research TBS tool for Heathrow developed with Lockheed Martin (now Leidos) TBS tool deployed at Heathrow
More informationApproach (TMA) Air Traffic Control. An Introduction to Approach/Departure Control Airspace and Operating Positions... 2
Approach (TMA) Air Traffic Control Table of Contents An Introduction to Approach/Departure Control................. 1 Airspace and Operating Positions........................... 2 Procedural Reference....................................
More informationFLIGHT OPERATIONS PANEL
International Civil Aviation Organization FLTOPSP/WG/2-WP/18 10/04/15 WORKING PAPER FLIGHT OPERATIONS PANEL WORKING GROUP MEETING SECOND MEETING Rome Italy, 4 to 8 May 2015 Agenda Item 5 : New Work Programme
More informationCLEARANCE INSTRUCTION READ BACK
CLEARANCE INSTRUCTION READ BACK 1. Introduction An ATC clearance or an instruction constitutes authority for an aircraft to proceed only in so far as known air traffic is concerned and is based solely
More informationNextGen Priorities: Multiple Runway Operations & RECAT
NextGen Priorities: Multiple Runway Operations & RECAT May 2018 Presented by Paul Strande & Jeffrey Tittsworth Federal Aviation Administration National Airspace System Today Air traffic services for the
More informationSESAR Solutions. Display Options
SESAR Solutions Outputs from the SESAR Programme R&I activities which relate to an Operational Improvement (OI) step or a small group of OI steps and its/their associated enablers, which have been designed,
More informationInterval Management A Brief Overview of the Concept, Benefits, and Spacing Algorithms
Center for Advanced Aviation System Development Interval Management A Brief Overview of the Concept, Benefits, and Spacing Algorithms Dr. Lesley A. Weitz Principal Systems Engineer The MITRE Corporation,
More informationFeasibility and Benefits of a Cockpit Traffic Display-Based Separation Procedure for Single Runway Arrivals and Departures
Feasibility and Benefits of a Cockpit Traffic Display-Based Separation Procedure for Single Runway Arrivals and Departures Implications of a Pilot Survey and Laboratory Simulations Dr. Anand M. Mundra
More informationASPASIA Project. ASPASIA Overall Summary. ASPASIA Project
ASPASIA Project ASPASIA Overall Summary ASPASIA Project ASPASIA Project ASPASIA (Aeronautical Surveillance and Planning by Advanced ) is an international project co-funded by the European Commission within
More informationStandard Operational Procedures
Standard Operational Procedures Aerodrome Ostrava Mošnov VERSION 1.2 CHANGES AND UPDATES Effective Version Change 24 JUN 09 1.1 LVP added. 12 FEB 11 1.2 General text revision. NOTES Official scenery and
More informationFollow up to the implementation of safety and air navigation regional priorities XMAN: A CONCEPT TAKING ADVANTAGE OF ATFCM CROSS-BORDER EXCHANGES
RAAC/15-WP/28 International Civil Aviation Organization 04/12/17 ICAO South American Regional Office Fifteenth Meeting of the Civil Aviation Authorities of the SAM Region (RAAC/15) (Asuncion, Paraguay,
More informationStandard Operating Procedures (SOPs) for BAGHDAD (ORBI)
Pag.1 of 11 Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) for BAGHDAD (ORBI) Index 1. FOREWORD... 3 2. ATC UNITS... 3 3. RECOMMENDATIONS... 3 3.1. TRANSITION ALTITUDE/LEVEL... 3 3.2. SEMI-CIRCULAR FLIGHT LEVEL
More informationDate: 25 Apr 2016 Time: 1714Z Position: 5107N 00024W Location: 10nm W Gatwick airport
AIRPROX REPORT No 2016071 Date: 25 Apr 2016 Time: 1714Z Position: 5107N 00024W Location: 10nm W Gatwick airport PART A: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION REPORTED TO UKAB Recorded Aircraft 1 Aircraft 2 Aircraft A319(A)
More informationAIR LAW AND ATC PROCEDURES
1 The International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO) establishes: A standards and recommended international practices for contracting member states. B aeronautical standards adopted by all states. C
More informationWhat is an Airspace Concept? Module 5
What is an Airspace Concept? Module 5 European Airspace Concept Workshops for PBN Implementation Overview Learning Objectives: At the end of this presentation you should: Understand what the purpose of
More informationWake Vortex R&D. Status Briefing. NBAA Convention. Federal Aviation Administration. By: Steve Lang Date: September 2007
Wake Vortex R&D Status Briefing NBAA Convention By: Steve Lang Date: September 2007 Topics for Today Wake Turbulence Program Overview Near Term Achievements The Future Wake Program Activities Near-Term
More informationNAVIGATION: CHARTS, PUBLICATIONS, FLIGHT COMPUTERS (chapters 7 & 8)
NAVIGATION: CHARTS, PUBLICATIONS, FLIGHT COMPUTERS (chapters 7 & 8) LONGITUDE AND LATITUDE 1. The location of an airport can be determined by the intersection of lines of latitude and longitude. a. Lines
More informationWorkshop Exercise, EGYPT Air Navigation Plan 10 /12/2010
Workshop Exercise, EGYPT Air Navigation Plan 10 /12/2010 INTERNATIONAL CIVIL AVIATION ORGANIZATION EASTERN AND SOUTHERN AFRICAN OFFICE WORKSHOP ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF NATIONAL PERFORMANCE FRAMEWORK FOR
More informationGreenville Spartanburg International
ZTL ARTCC Greenville Spartanburg International Airport Traffic Control Tower Standard Operating Procedures GSP 7110.65B Effective: May 1, 2011 1 CHAPTER 1. GENERAL CONTROL SECTION 1. EQUIPMENT 2-1-1. Callsign
More informationNAM/CAR Regional Safety/Air Navigation/Aviation Security Implementation Matters 5.2 Effectiveness of air navigation implementation mechanisms
06/09/17 Seventh Meeting of the North American, Central American and Caribbean Directors of Civil Aviation (NACC/DCA/07) Washington, D. C., United States, 19 21 September 2017 Agenda Item 5: NAM/CAR Regional
More informationIFR FLIGHT BRIEFING. This IFR flight briefing presentation has been made concise and simple in order to easily handle the IFR flight preparation.
IFR FLIGHT BRIEFING 1. Introduction This IFR flight briefing presentation has been made concise and simple in order to easily handle the IFR flight preparation. As IVAO, in a simulated area, is different
More informationTime-Space Analysis Airport Runway Capacity. Dr. Antonio A. Trani. Fall 2017
Time-Space Analysis Airport Runway Capacity Dr. Antonio A. Trani CEE 3604 Introduction to Transportation Engineering Fall 2017 Virginia Tech (A.A. Trani) Why Time Space Diagrams? To estimate the following:
More informationAssignment 10: Final Project
CEE 4674: Airport Planning and Design Spring 2017 Assignment 10: Final Project Due: May 4, 2017 (via email and PDF) Final Exam Time is May 5 Requirements for this assignment are: a) Slide presentation
More informationTHE GLIDER PILOTS: Despite extensive tracing action, none of the glider pilots could be identified.
AIRPROX REPORT No 2014126 Date/Time: 30 Jul 2014 1418Z Position: 5211N 00030W (3.5nm NW Bedford) Airspace: London FIR (Class: G) Aircraft 1 Aircraft 2 Type: Jetstream 31 Untraced glider Operator: Alt/FL:
More informationRALEIGH-DURHAM ATCT/TRACON STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES
RALEIGH-DURHAM ATCT/TRACON STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES January 3, 2017 BULLETIN NUMBER RECORD OF CHANGES SUBJECT AUTHORIZED BY DATE ENTERED DATE REMOVED 7110.100 Initial RR 1/3/17 3/25/17 7110.101 Added
More informationHOLDING STACK MANAGEMENT
1. Introduction HOLDING STACK MANAGEMENT When an air traffic controller has such an amount of traffic in his approach area that he cannot handle more traffic for a determined or non-determined period of
More informationDate: 29 Apr 2017 Time: 1119Z Position: 5226N 00112W Location: 10nm ENE Coventry
AIRPROX REPORT No 2017080 Date: 29 Apr 2017 Time: 1119Z Position: 5226N 00112W Location: 10nm ENE Coventry PART A: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION REPORTED TO UKAB Recorded Aircraft 1 Aircraft 2 Aircraft C560 PA28
More informationLearning Objectives. By the end of this presentation you should understand:
Designing Routes 1 Learning Objectives By the end of this presentation you should understand: Benefits of RNAV Considerations when designing airspace routes The basic principles behind route spacing The
More informationRWY 24. Designator Route Remarks. All traffic shall initially climb to 4000FT QNH with climb gradient 3.3% MNM, unless instructed otherwise by ATC.
AD 2.ELLX-15 DISKI 2Y GTQ 7X GTQ 7Y MMD 7X RAPOR 4X 3.2.2 Climb Requirements RWY 24 Designator Route Remarks R-238 LUX to 8 DME LUX, RT to intercept R-222 NTM to 24 DME NTM, RT R-156 DIK, LT R-115 LUX
More informationAnalysis of ATM Performance during Equipment Outages
Analysis of ATM Performance during Equipment Outages Jasenka Rakas and Paul Schonfeld November 14, 2000 National Center of Excellence for Aviation Operations Research Table of Contents Introduction Objectives
More informationANNEX ANNEX. to the. Commission Implementing Regulation (EU).../...
Ref. Ares(2018)5478153-25/10/2018 EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, XXX [ ](2018) XXX draft ANNEX ANNEX to the Commission Implementing Regulation (EU).../... laying down a performance and charging scheme in
More informationAirport capacity effects of RECAT or: An airport view on RECAT
Airport capacity effects of RECAT or: An airport view on RECAT 21st June 2011, WakeNet-3 Europe RECAT Workshop at TU Berlin S. Wendeberg (FBA-IL2) Fraport AG Seite 2 The best way to anticipate the future
More informationZTL ARTCC. Asheville Regional. Air Traffic Control Tower. Standard Operating Procedures AVL B. Effective: May 1, 2011
ZTL ARTCC Asheville Regional Air Traffic Control Tower Standard Operating Procedures AVL 7110.65B Effective: May 1, 2011 CHAPTER 1. GENERAL CONTROL SECTION 1. EQUIPMENT 1 1-1-1. Callsign Usage and Frequency
More informationhelicopter? Fixed wing 4p58 HINDSIGHT SITUATIONAL EXAMPLE
HINDSIGHT SITUATIONAL EXAMPLE Fixed wing or helicopter? Editorial note: Situational examples are based on the experience of the authors and do not represent either a particular historical event or a full
More informationVOLUME D: AIRSPACE Airspace Architecture NEW PARALLEL RUNWAY DRAFT EIS/MDP FOR PUBLIC COMMENT D3-25
D3 VOLUME D: AIRSPACE Airspace Architecture D3-25 D3 VOLUME D: AIRSPACE Airspace Architecture CONTENTS 3.1 Introduction 29 3.2 Existing Modes of Operation 30 3.3 Modes of Operation for NPR 31 3.3.1 Over-Bay
More informationAppendix B. Comparative Risk Assessment Form
Appendix B Comparative Risk Assessment Form B-1 SEC TRACKING No: This is the number assigned CRA Title: Title as assigned by the FAA SEC to the CRA by the FAA System Engineering Council (SEC) SYSTEM: This
More informationAir Navigation Bureau ICAO Headquarters, Montreal
Performance Based Navigation Introduction to PBN Air Navigation Bureau ICAO Headquarters, Montreal 1 Performance Based Navigation Aviation Challenges Navigation in Context Transition to PBN Implementation
More informationSAFETY BULLETIN. One Level of Safety Worldwide Safety Bulletin No. 05SAB004 5 July 2004
IFLP SFETY BULLETIN THE GLOBL VOICE OF PILOTS One Level of Safety Worldwide Safety Bulletin No. 05SB004 5 July 2004 CS II - TCS II and VFR traffic This Document was produced in co-operation with EUROCTROL
More informationContinuous Descent? And RNAV Arrivals
Continuous Descent? And RNAV Arrivals From an ATC Perspective Presentation to: CDA Workshop GA Tech Name: Don Porter RNP Project Lead FAA, RNAV RNP Group Date: 18 April 2006 My Background 22 years Terminal
More informationPOST-IMPLEMENTATION COMMUNITY IMPACT REVIEW
POST-IMPLEMENTATION COMMUNITY IMPACT REVIEW RNAV STAR updates and RNP AR approaches at Winnipeg James Armstrong Richardson International Airport NAV CANADA 77 Metcalfe Street Ottawa, Ontario K1P 5L6 November
More informationPilot Briefing Document Cross The Pond 2013 Heathrow Airport EGLL/LHR
Pilot Briefing Document Cross The Pond 2013 Heathrow Airport EGLL/LHR VATSIM-UK and the Heathrow Regional Training Scheme look forward to welcoming you into Heathrow! We ll have all our controllers briefed
More informationOPERATIONS MANUAL PART A
PAGE: 1 Table of Content A.GENERAL /CHAPTER 7 -....3 7.... 3 7.1 Minimum Flight Altitudes /Flight Levels VFR Flight... 3 7.2 Minimum Flight Altitudes /Flight Levels IFR Flight... 4 7.2.1 IFR flights non
More information