H I G H S I E R R A H I K E R S A S S O C I A T I O N
|
|
- Ralph Hampton
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 H I G H S I E R R A H I K E R S A S S O C I A T I O N PO BOX 8920 SO. LAKE TAHOE CA April 16, 2013 Don L. Neubacher, Superintendent Yosemite National Park P.O. Box 577 Yosemite, CA RE: Comments on Merced Wild and Scenic River Draft Comprehensive Management Plan ( Plan ) and Draft Environmental Impact Statement ( DEIS ) Dear Superintendent Neubacher: The High Sierra Hikers Association ( High Sierra ) is a nonprofit public benefit organization that educates its members, public officials, and the public at large about issues affecting hikers and the Sierra Nevada, and that advocates the protection of park values and preservation of wilderness character in the Sierra for the public benefit. High Sierra represents thousands of citizens living throughout the United States who use and enjoy Yosemite s wilderness, wild & scenic rivers (including the Merced River corridor), and other backcountry and frontcountry areas for hiking, camping, backpacking, climbing, mountaineering, cross country skiing, horse packing, wildlife viewing, photography, and other recreational pursuits, as well as to seek solitude, quietude, and spiritual refreshment. This letter transmits our comments on the above referenced Plan and its accompanying DEIS. Our scoping comments (dated June 6, 2007 and January 28, 2010) and our subsequent additional comments regarding the Merced River Plan (dated May 30, 2010 and April 14, 2011) are hereby incorporated by reference, and should be already included in your project record. Please contact us at the letterhead address if any of these four important background documents are not in your project record and/or if you need additional copies of our earlier comments.
2 Page 2 of 8 In sum, High Sierra is very concerned that: (1) the proposed Plan fails to heed the Park Service s Organic Act by allowing impairment of park scenery and other resources; (2) the proposed Plan fails to limit commercial enterprises as required by the Wild & Scenic Rivers Act; (3) the proposed Plan fails to ensure timely compliance with clear direction provided by Congress regarding the High Sierra Camps ; (4) the DEIS fails to comply with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) because it does not adequately evaluate and disclose the environmental consequences of the proposed actions; and (5) the proposed project fails to comply even with Yosemite s own General Management Plan. High Sierra Camps High Sierra is especially concerned about the commercial High Sierra Camps (HSCs) at Vogelsang, May Lake, Sunrise, and Merced Lake, all of which drain to the Merced River. These aged and ugly facilities create significant, profound, and harmful negative impacts on the Merced River corridor and on the environment of Yosemite National Park. For example, numerous significant pollutants of human occupancy are produced at the camps, including sewage (human body wastes), gray water from showers, grease and detergent from kitchens, and other garbage and trash. Wastewater, sewage, and other wastes from these developments pollute the meadows, soils, and waters of Yosemite. Further, the numerous packtrains needed to supply the camps significantly damage and pollute trails and surrounding areas, including the Merced River. Congress specifically recognized these threats to Yosemite when it passed the California Wilderness Act of That Act, signed by President Reagan, bestowed formal wilderness designation upon much of the Yosemite backcountry. Congress allowed the HSCs to (temporarily) remain, but stated:...if and when it occurs that the continued operation of these facilities...results in an increased adverse impact on the adjacent wilderness environment (including increased adverse impact on the natural environment within the enclaves themselves), the operation of these facilities shall be promptly terminated, the facilities removed, the sites naturalized, and in the procedure set forth by section 9 of the bill, the areas promptly designated as wilderness.
3 The simple truth is that the HSCs are a destructive commercial venture initiated by the early concessionaires Desmond and Curry. The Park Service climbed onto this money making (for the Currys) venture in the 1920s, encouraging the building of additional camps in order to get more people into the backcountry. But the problem is now reversed: so many people want to visit Yosemite s backcountry that access is strictly rationed. If environmental impacts in the backcountry are to be kept at or below any certain level, then for every person who stays at a High Sierra Camp you will have to refuse access to ten or more people who travel on foot and do not need to be supplied by commercial packtrains. The DEIS fails to honestly acknowledge, evaluate, or disclose these fundamental facts. The Vogelsang HSC (capacity 42) is located within the Merced River watershed, and all of the pollutants generated and discharged at the camp therefore drain to the Merced River. The same is true of the commercial camps at Merced Lake (capacity 60), May Lake (capacity 36), and Sunrise (capacity 34). The trails to all of these HSCs are battered and eroded by the commercial packtrains that supply the camps. The numerous commercial packtrains leave manure covered trails, featuring flies and stench and dust. For the sake of those few commercial clients, dozens of people every day and during the course of an entire season, thousands are inconvenienced, offended, and exposed to health hazards by the disgusting condition of the trails. Further, scientists from the University of California (U.C. Davis Medical School) have documented that Yosemite s waters are being significantly polluted, and concluded that: pack animals are most likely the source of coliform [bacterial] pollution (Derlet and Carlson 2006). The House Committee Report prepared for the 1984 California Wilderness Act also stated:...because of the importance of continuing monitoring and assessment of this situation, immediately upon enactment of this bill into law, the Secretary of the Interior should document current baseline operational and environmental impact conditions of all of these facilities [HSC camps], and he should also, within one year of the date of enactment, report in writing to the relevant committee of the House and Senate, his findings and recommendations as to this matter. Annual assessments of Page 3 of 8
4 Page 4 of 8 this situation should thereafter be made by the Secretary to assure continued monitoring of conditions. (House Committee Report No ) The Park Service at Yosemite has never prepared the baseline reports or submitted the annual monitoring reports requested by Congress, and High Sierra is concerned that the Park Service has ignored and continues to scoff at Congress direction to monitor and document the serious impacts caused by these commercial developments. The HSCs are classified as potential wilderness additions, which, by law, must be treated and managed essentially the same as wilderness. (See the California Wilderness Act of 1984, Section 9.) However, despite the ongoing and increased impacts of the HSCs, and the clear direction from Congress, the NPS has made ongoing efforts to hide the impacts of these facilities from Congress and the public, and has illegally continued to use nonconforming methods (i.e., helicopters) to maintain the HSCs and to construct new developments (i.e., sewage mounds, toilets, etc.) at the HSCs. Congress specifically directed that: Helicopter use for routine nonemergency purposes associated with visitor use is a questionable activity in national park system wilderness areas and should be eliminated within designated national park system wilderness. (House Committee Report No , at p. 51) In sum, the DEIS fails to honestly analyze and clearly disclose the many environmental impacts to the Merced River and its corridor caused by the HSCs at Vogelsang, May Lake, Sunrise, and Merced Lake. Significant impacts include, but are not limited to: (1) impaired scenery; (2) degraded trails; (3) pollution of surface and ground waters by sewage and wastewater produced at the HSCs; (4) pollution of surface waters by manure (containing bacteria and pathogens) produced by pack animals that service the camps; (5) harm to wildlife that come in contact with sewage, kitchen/bath wastes, and human food sources; and (6) harm to native songbirds due to proliferation of brown headed cowbirds. Your Plan should permanently remove all of the HSCs discussed above, restore the sites, and propose that the potential wilderness additions be designated as wilderness as intended by Congress in the California Wilderness Act (see Section 9; and House Committee Report No ).
5 The HSCs are an anachronism an out of date holdover from the bad old days of the 1920s through the early 1960s, when more development and more commercialism were considered desirable and beneficial. It is time for the National Park Service to catch up with the times (and heed its Organic Act) by choosing preservation of park resources, scenery, wilderness character, and wild river values over ongoing exploitation and impairment. We are aware that some staff members at Yosemite have proposed that the polluting commercial camps be grandfathered, and perhaps even codified in your plan as Outstandingly Remarkable Values (ORVs). Any attempt to enshrine the HSCs as ORVs would be both ludicrous and unlawful, and is unacceptable. In order for recreational uses to be considered as an ORV, a value must be: 1) river related or river dependent, and 2) rare, unique, or exemplary in a regional or national context. The High Sierra Camps are none of these. The camps simply offer a luxury, catered, pampered lodging experience that is neither river related nor river dependent. And those who desire soft bedding, fancy meals, and showers can find such comforts in thousands of locations throughout the region, state, and nation. These elitist camps are nothing more than commercial tent villages catering to the comforts and convenience of a very small minority of park visitors, at the expense of everyone else. The camps degrade scenery, pollute water, create noise, and impair Yosemite s river values and wilderness character in many other ways. As discussed above and in our previous comments, Congress has expressed serious concerns about the camps, and authorized the Park Service to remove them. Any attempt to designate these commercial camps as ORVs would therefore be arbitrary and capricious. Others have tried to rationalize the retention of the aged, unsightly, and polluting commercial High Sierra Camps on the grounds that they are historic and/or somehow an important part of our heritage that should be continued. This is a bankrupt abuse of language that has been used repeatedly throughout Yosemiteʹs history to justify continuing ruinous practices that were, many years too late, recognized as the uninformed, anti social, and anti environmental practices that they were. Some examples in point: Page 5 of 8
6 The famous firefall. The absurd business of shoving a huge bonfire off a 3,000 foot cliff every evening for the entertainment of the mob. Finally ceased in January 1969, when at long last it occurred to the powers that be that this was probably the worst model for behavior in a national park that one could imagine. During the 1920s and 1930s, by far the greatest tourist attraction in Yosemite Valley was the feeding of bears at a garbage dump. The bear feeding platform was such a permanent fixture that it even appeared on the USGS topo maps of the time. Initiated by catastrophic ignorance. Eliminated by modest recovery of sanity. In the prewar halcyon days there was actually a Yosemite zoo, featuring lion cubs, bear cubs, and deer. And here we are in 2013, still hopelessly mired in the past. The current Plan proposes to continue the HSCs with but a few cosmetic tweaks around the edges (plus some unlawful new developments). Horses and mules are non native, disease carrying, weed spreading animals. On those grounds alone they should be barred from Yosemite except in cases where they are absolutely necessary. Yet the proposed Plan persists in encouraging their use, and the NPS resists all efforts to reduce or eliminate their damaging and polluting impacts. Why is this your policy, and how can you justify it? Furthermore, the General Management Plan (GMP) for Yosemite National Park states that: Potential wilderness classification will prevent any further development of facilities or services; should existing developments be removed, there will be no reconstruction of facilities. Yet, despite the clear direction from Congress and this clear direction contained in Yosemite s own GMP, the draft Plan proposes to construct new toilet facilities at some HSCs. This would be unlawful. The GMP clearly prohibits any further installation of facilities or services at the HSCs. The NPS should stop trying to rationalize the existence of the HSCs, and it should cease all plans to install new facilities or services. Page 6 of 8
7 Page 7 of 8 Commercial Enterprises The HSCs and the packtrains used to supply them are commercial activities. The Plan essentially continues business as usual with only a few minor cosmetic changes to these commercial enterprises. This violates the Wild & Scenic Rivers Act by failing to adequately limit and regulate harmful commercial ventures. Invasive Weeds Our scoping comments (dated June 6, 2007) discussed at length the issue of invasive weeds. Please refer to those comments for a detailed discussion of this issue. An additional study documents weed invasions in Yosemite (Exotic Species Threat Assessment and Management Prioritization for Sequoia Kings Canyon and Yosemite National Parks, by J. Gerlach and others, April 2001), and provides clear evidence that domestic stock animals (i.e., horses and mules) are responsible for introducing and spreading weeds in Yosemite. The DEIS fails to honestly evaluate and fully disclose these impacts, and the Plan fails to incorporate mandatory measures that would effectively prevent the introduction and spread of weeds. Water Quality & Water Pollution Our scoping comments of September 2006 discussed and provided a copy of a publication by Derlet and Carlson (2006), which documented contamination of surface waters in Yosemite National Park due to pack & saddle stock animals (i.e., horses & mules). Subsequent research has confirmed those findings (see Risk Factors for Coliform Bacteria in Backcountry Lakes and Streams in the Sierra Nevada Mountains: a 5 Year Study, by R. Derlet and others, Wilderness and Environmental Medicine 19:82 90). a Because stock animals are known to contaminate surface waters with diseasecausing pathogens (and because of the many other stock related impacts discussed in our earlier comments cited above), the use of stock animals should be prohibited within the Merced River corridor, except in cases where they are absolutely necessary. When stock animals must be used, their numbers should be a Although these two scientific papers (i.e., Derlet and Carlson 2006; Derlet and others 2008) are listed in the DEIS s bibliography, the DEIS fails to honestly analyze or disclose the papers findings or to acknowledge the conclusion that Yosemite s waters are being significantly polluted by domestic stock animals. Simply listing papers in the bibliography does not constitute analysis and disclosure of the significant environmental impacts documented therein.
8 as few as possible, and every feasible effort must be made to avoid water pollution from animal wastes, such as by requiring that all stock animals be outfitted with manure catchers, which are now readily available and inexpensive. (See, for example, and Impacts of Stock Use The DEIS contains no serious or honest description, evaluation, or disclosure of the many profound and adverse physical and organic environmental impacts caused by domestic stock animals (i.e., horses and mules). (See our previous comments for detailed summaries of the many significant impacts.) The DEIS contains only unsubstantiated conclusions in an apparent attempt to rationalize business as usual in regards to stock use, and it fails despite many hundreds of pages to provide the public and decision makers with any real information about the serious impacts of stock use: trail damage, water pollution, spread of invasive weeds, proliferation of parasitic cowbirds, etc. Summary & Conclusion Page 8 of 8 For the reasons stated above, High Sierra is very concerned that: (1) the proposed Plan fails to ensure timely compliance with direction provided by Congress regarding the High Sierra Camps ; (2) the proposed Plan fails to heed the Park Service s Organic Act by allowing impairment of park scenery and other resources; (3) the proposed Plan fails to limit commercial enterprises as required by the Wild & Scenic Rivers Act; (4) the DEIS fails to comply with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) because it does not adequately evaluate and disclose the environmental consequences of the proposed actions as required by NEPA; and (5) the proposed Plan would violated Yosemite s own GMP by installing new developments and facilities at the HSCs. We appreciate this opportunity to provide comments. Please keep us informed of all opportunities for public involvement for this project, and send complete printed copies of all planning workbooks and environmental and decision documents for our review. Sincerely, Jeff Kane, Conservation Associate High Sierra Hikers Association
RE: Access Fund Comments on Yosemite National Park Wilderness Stewardship Plan, Preliminary Ideas and Concepts
September 30, 2016 Superintendent Yosemite National Park Attn: Wilderness Stewardship Plan P.O. Box 577 Yosemite, CA 95389 RE: Access Fund Comments on Yosemite National Park Wilderness Stewardship Plan,
More informationFinal Environmental Impact Statement for the Merced Wild and Scenic River. Comprehensive Management Plan, Yosemite National Park, Madera and Mariposa
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 02/26/2014 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2014-04061, and on FDsys.gov DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 4312-FF NATIONAL
More informationUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, DAVIS
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, DAVIS BERKELEY DAVIS IRVINE LOS ANGELES MERCED RIVERSIDE SAN DIEGO SAN FRANCISCO SANTA BARBARA SANTA CRUZ SCHOOL OF MEDICINE UC DAVIS MEDICAL CENTER DEPARTMENT OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE
More informationMontana Wilderness Association v. McAllister, 666 F.3d 549 (9th Cir. 2011). Matt Jennings I. INTRODUCTION
Montana Wilderness Association v. McAllister, 666 F.3d 549 (9th Cir. 2011). Matt Jennings I. INTRODUCTION In Montana Wilderness Association v. McAllister, 1 the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth
More informationNational Wilderness Steering Committee
National Wilderness Steering Committee Guidance White Paper Number 1 Issue: Cultural Resources and Wilderness Date: November 30, 2002 Introduction to the Issue Two of the purposes of the National Wilderness
More informationWilderness Stewardship Plan Scoping Newsletter Winter 2013
Olympic National Park National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Wilderness Stewardship Plan Scoping Newsletter Winter 2013 Dear Friends and Neighbors, The Olympic Wilderness was established
More informationSent via to: to:
P.O. Box 9175, Missoula, MT 59807 (P) 406.542.2048 wild@wildernesswatch.org www.wildernesswatch.org Board of Directors Howie Wolke President, WY Gary Macfarlane Vice-President, MT Phyllis Reed Darrington
More informationLESSON 9 Recognizing Recreational Benefits of Wilderness
LESSON 9 Recognizing Recreational Benefits of Wilderness Objectives: Students will: study, analyze, and compare recreation visitor days (RVD s) for Wilderness areas adjacent to their homes or nearest state,
More informationContinental Divide National Scenic Trail Legislative History and Planning Guidance
Continental Divide National Scenic Trail Legislative History and Planning Guidance Legislation, Policy, and Direction Regarding National Scenic Trails The National Trails System Act, P.L. 90-543, was passed
More informationJune 19, 2015 Phyllis Reed Darrington Ranger District 1405 Emens Street Darrington, WA 98241
P.O. Box 9175, Missoula, MT 59807 (P) 406.542.2048 wild@wildernesswatch.org www.wildernesswatch.org Board of Directors Louise Lasley President, WY Howie Wolke Vice-President, MT Jerome Walker Secretary/Treasurer,
More informationLogo Department Name Agency Organization Organization Address Information 5700 North Sabino Canyon Road
Logo Department Name Agency Organization Organization Address Information United States Forest Coronado National Forest 5700 North Sabino Canyon Road Department of Service Santa Catalina Ranger District
More informationDecision Memo Broken Wheel Ranch Equestrian Outfitter Special-Use Permit Proposed Action
Decision Memo Broken Wheel Ranch Equestrian Outfitter Special-Use Permit USDA Forest Service Mississippi Bluffs Ranger District, Shawnee National Forest Jackson and Union Counties, Illinois Proposed Action
More informationMinimum Requirements References in National Park Service Policy
Minimum Requirements References in National Park Service Policy 2006 NPS Management Policies Chapter 6: Wilderness Preservation and Management 6.3 Wilderness Resource Management 6.3.1 General Policy (in
More informationAugust 30, Dear Superintendent Taylor-Goodrich:
P.O. Box 9175 Missoula, MT 59807 p: 406.542.2048 wild@wildernesswatch.org www.wildernesswatch.org August 30, 2011 Board of Directors Jon Dettmann President Minnesota Louise Lasley Vice President Wyoming
More informationConnie Rudd Superintendent, Black Canyon of the Gunnison National Park
National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Black Canyon of the Gunnison National Park and Curecanti National Recreation Area Information Brochure #1 Wilderness and Backcountry Management Plan
More informationSuperintendent David Uberuaga June 27, 2011 Grand Canyon National Park P.O. Box 129 Grand Canyon, AZ 86023
Superintendent David Uberuaga June 27, 2011 Grand Canyon National Park P.O. Box 129 Grand Canyon, AZ 86023 Dear Superintendent Uberuaga, Thank you for the opportunity to provide scoping comments on Grand
More informationGood Neighbour Guide A guide to being a good neighbour in Peachland
District of Peachland Good Neighbour Guide A guide to being a good neighbour in Peachland 1 Introduction to the Guide Good neighbours make great neighbourhoods. We each play a role in enhancing our neighbourhoods
More informationDIRECTOR S ORDER #41: Wilderness Preservation and Management
These are relevant sections about Wilderness Management Plans from National Park Service 2006 Management Policies, Director s Orders #41 and Reference Manual 41. National Park Service U.S. Department of
More informationThank you for this third opportunity to comment on the proposed revisions to the Coconino National Forest Management plan.
March 19, 2014 Flagstaff Biking Organization PO Box 23851 Flagstaff, AZ 86002 Vern Keller Coconino National Forest Attn: Plan Revision 1824 South Thompson Street Flagstaff, Arizona 86001 coconino_national_forest_plan_revision_team@fs.fed.us
More informationJill Hawk Chief Ranger, Mount Rainier National Park Tahoma Woods, Star Route Ashford, WA 98304
January 21, 2003 Jill Hawk Chief Ranger, Mount Rainier National Park Tahoma Woods, Star Route Ashford, WA 98304 Re: Analysis of the Mount Rainier Climbing Program; Proposal to Increase Special Fee Dear
More informationArthur Carhart National Wilderness Training Center s Wilderness Investigations High School
Arthur Carhart National Training Center s Investigations High School 101/Lesson 2 (OPTION 2B) Introducing the Act Goal: Students will understand the difference between wild spaces and federally designated
More informationS Central Coast Heritage Protection Act APRIL 21, 2016
STATEMENT OF GLENN CASAMASSA ASSOCIATE DEPUTY CHIEF, NATIONAL FOREST SYSTEM U.S. FOREST SERVICE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE BEFORE THE UNITED STATES SENATE COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES
More informationLESSON 5 Wilderness Management Case Studies
LESSON 5 Wilderness Management Case Studies Objectives: Students will: review the key points of the Wilderness Act of 1964. brainstorm solutions for Wilderness management issues. Materials: Í Leave no
More informationThank you for this second opportunity to comment on the proposed revisions to the Coconino National Forest Management plan.
March 8, 2011 Flagstaff Biking Organization PO Box 23851 Flagstaff, AZ 86002 Yewah Lau Coconino National Forest Attn: Plan Revision 1824 South Thompson Street Flagstaff, Arizona 86001 Sent via electronic
More informationSecuring Permanent Protection for Public Land
Securing Permanent Protection for Public Land Tools for Wyoming Advocates Paul Spitler* The Wilderness Society * I am a wilderness policy expert, not a powerpoint expert! Platform and Resolutions of the
More informationNational Park Service Wilderness Action Plan
National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Wilderness Action Plan National Wilderness Steering Committee National Park Service "The mountains can be reached in all seasons.
More informationNatural and Cultural Resources Management, Part 610: Wilderness Stewardship
Natural and Cultural Resources Management, Part 610: Wilderness Stewardship 2.5 May the Service allow structures and installations in wilderness? Section 4(c) of the Wilderness Act generally prohibits
More informationWilderness Research. in Alaska s National Parks. Scientists: Heading to the Alaska Wilderness? Introduction
Wilderness Research in Alaska s National Parks National Park Service U.S. Department of Interior Scientists: Heading to the Alaska Wilderness? Archeologist conducts fieldwork in Gates of the Arctic National
More informationProposed Scotchman Peaks Wilderness Act 2016 (S.3531)
1 Proposed Scotchman Peaks Wilderness Act 2016 (S.3531) Frequently Asked Questions PLACE Where is the area that would be designated as Wilderness? The lands outlined in S.3531 lie within Idaho along its
More informationMr Mick Gentleman Chair, Standing Committee on Planning and Environment Committee ACT Legislative Assembly Canberra ACT 2601
Mr Mick Gentleman Chair, Standing Committee on Planning and Environment Committee ACT Legislative Assembly Canberra ACT 2601 Dear Mr Gentleman Thank you for the opportunity to comment a second time on
More informationPROPOSED ACTION South 3000 East Salt Lake City, UT United States Department of Agriculture
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest Salt Lake Ranger District 6944 South 3000 East Salt Lake City, UT 84121 801-733-2660 File Code: 1950/2300 Date:
More informationUSDA Forest Service Deschutes National Forest DECISION MEMO. Round Lake Christian Camp Master Plan for Reconstruction and New Facilities
USDA Forest Service Deschutes National Forest DECISION MEMO Round Lake Christian Camp Master Plan for Reconstruction and New Facilities Jefferson County, Oregon T. 13 S., R. 8 E., Section 16, W.M. Background:
More informationWilderness Areas Designated by the White Pine County bill
Wilderness Areas Designated by the White Pine County bill SEC. 321. SHORT TITLE. This subtitle may be cited as the `Pam White Wilderness Act of 2006'. SEC. 322. FINDINGS. Congress finds that-- The White
More informationDECISION MEMO. Rawhide Trail #7073 Maintenance and Reconstruction
Page 1 of 6 Background DECISION MEMO USDA Forest Service Jefferson Ranger District Jefferson County, Montana Rawhide Trail #7073 is located in the Elkhorn Mountain Range approximately 10 miles east of
More informationDear Reviewing Officer:
From: To: Subject: Date: Attachments: Peter Hart FS-r02admin-review Objection Re: Maroon Bells Snowmass Wilderness Overnight Visitor Use Management Plan Monday, August 14, 2017 8:38:01 PM Final Objection
More informationBUCKEYE LAKE PROTECTION PLAN THE TOWN OF BEECH MOUNTAIN REGULATIONS GOVERNING IN-LAKE ACTIVITIES AND USES OF BUCKEYE LAKE
I. PURPOSE BUCKEYE LAKE PROTECTION PLAN THE TOWN OF BEECH MOUNTAIN REGULATIONS GOVERNING IN-LAKE ACTIVITIES AND USES OF BUCKEYE LAKE The purpose of this regulation is to set forth for the Town of Beech
More informationAs outlined in the Tatshenshini-Alsek Park Management Agreement, park management will:
Management Strategy General Strategy The priority management focus for the park is to ensure that its internationally significant natural, cultural heritage and recreational values are protected and that
More informationCoronado National Forest Santa Catalina Ranger District
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Coronado National Forest Santa Catalina Ranger District File Code: 1950 Date: October 14, 2015 Dear Interested Party: The Santa Catalina Ranger District
More informationSouthern Shenandoah Valley Chapter
Southern Shenandoah Valley Chapter June 7, 2018 Members of the State Water Control Board c/o Office of Regulatory Affairs, Department of Environmental Quality P.O. Box 1105 Richmond, Virginia 23218 citizenboards@deq.virginia.gov
More informationCentral Cascades Wilderness Strategies Project
Central Cascades Wilderness Strategies Project Wilderness is Unique What makes designated Wilderness different from other national forest lands? Wilderness Act of 1964 to assure that an increasing population
More informationCHESTER COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT 402. CONTROL OF SANITATION IN ORGANIZED CAMPS AND CAMPGROUNDS.
CHESTER COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT 402. CONTROL OF SANITATION IN ORGANIZED CAMPS AND CAMPGROUNDS. 402.1. GENERAL PROVISIONS. 402.1.1 PURPOSE. The purpose of this Section is to provide for the protection
More informationTESTIMONY ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE YOSEMITE VALLEY PLAN. April 22, 2003
TESTIMONY ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE YOSEMITE VALLEY PLAN April 22, 2003 For consideration by the Subcommittee on National Parks, Recreation and Public Lands United States House of Representatives Submitted
More information112th CONGRESS. 1st Session H. R. 113 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
HR 113 IH 112th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 113 To provide for additions to the Cucamonga and Sheep Mountain Wilderness Areas in the Angeles and San Bernardino National Forests and the protection of existing
More informationWILDERNESS PLANNING. Wilderness. Interagency Regional Wilderness Stewardship Training. Alamosa, Colorado - March 26-29, 2007
WILDERNESS PLANNING Interagency Regional Wilderness Stewardship Training Alamosa, Colorado - March 26-29, 2007 Suzanne Stutzman Lead Planner/Wilderness Coordinator National Park Service, Intermountain
More informationUSDA Trails Strategy WRI: ENGLISH PEAK SURVEY. Theodore Mendoza San Diego State University June 6 th 2016 August 18 th Advisor: Sam Commarto
WRI: ENGLISH PEAK SURVEY Theodore Mendoza San Diego State University June 6 th 2016 August 18 th 2016 Advisor: Sam Commarto Klamath National Forest Submitted: March 21, 2017 Table of Contents Acknowledgements
More informationBACKCOUNTRY TRAIL FLOOD REHABILITATION PROGRAM
BACKCOUNTRY TRAIL FLOOD REHABILITATION PROGRAM Backcountry Trail Flood Rehabilitation A June 2013 Flood Recovery Program Summary In June 2013, parts of Southern Alberta were devastated from significant
More informationWORKSHEET 1 Wilderness Qualities or Attributes Evaluating the Effects of Project Activities on Wilderness Attributes
WORKSHEET 1 Wilderness Qualities or Attributes Evaluating the Effects of Project Activities on Wilderness Attributes Date: 3/7/2017 Roadless Area: Ruby South Description of Project Activity or Impact to
More informationWrangell St. Elias National Park & Preserve ATTN: Bruce Rogers P.O. Box 439 Copper Center, AK 99573
P.O. Box 9175, Missoula, MT 59807 (P) 406.542.2048 wild@wildernesswatch.org www.wildernesswatch.org Board of Directors Howie Wolke President, MT Gary Macfarlane Vice-President, ID Jerome Walker Secretary/Treasurer,
More informationMAINTENANCE OF THE PRIMEVAL IN NATIONAL PARKS By Arno B. Cammerer Director, National Park Service
MAINTENANCE OF THE PRIMEVAL IN NATIONAL PARKS By Arno B. Cammerer Director, National Park Service The term "park" has been applied so long to a man-made area planted to vegetation that it is sometimes
More informationPreliminary Analysis to Aid Public Comment on TSA s Proposed Nude Body Scanner Rule (Version 0.9 March 29, 2013)
Preliminary Analysis to Aid Public Comment on TSA s Proposed Nude Body Scanner Rule (Version 0.9 March 29, 2013) On March 26, 2013, the Transportation Security Administration began a courtordered public
More informationCode of conduct on international travel and invasive alien species
Code of conduct on international travel and invasive alien species Riccardo Scalera Programme officer, IUCN/SSC Invasive Species Specialist Group 37th meeting of the Standing Committee of the Bern Convention
More informationOverview. Wilderness Act of Statement of Need. What is Wilderness Character. Monitoring Wilderness Character
Overview Monitoring Wilderness Character What What & Why? How? How? Conceptual Development How? How? Implementation Future? Future? Troy Hall Steve Boutcher USFS Wilderness & Wild and Scenic River Program
More informationROAD AND TRAIL PROJECT APPROVAL
ROAD AND TRAIL PROJECT APPROVAL www.marincountyparks.org Marin County Parks, 3501 Civic Center Dr, Suite 260, San Rafael, CA 94903 DATE: July 12, 2017 PRESERVE: Gary Giacomini Open Space Preserve PROJECT:
More informationAppalachian Mountain Club
Appalachian Mountain Club January 30, 2013 Groton Planning Board 754 North Groton Road Groton, NH 03241 Re: Re-opened public hearing regarding a request by EDP Renewables (Lessee), EXPX2/MAXAM (Owner)
More informationFINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT BACKCOUNTRY/WILDERNESS MANAGEMENT PLAN AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ROCKY MOUNTAIN NATIONAL PARK
FONSI FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT BACKCOUNTRY/WILDERNESS MANAGEMENT PLAN AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ROCKY MOUNTAIN NATIONAL PARK The Backcountry/Wilderness Management Plan for Rocky Mountain National
More information16 June Conservation. Education
16 June 2017 Conservation Education Recreation Since 1922 Member Services 814 Goggins Rd. Lake George, NY 12845-4117 Phone: (518) 668-4447 Fax: (518) 668-3746 e-mail: adkinfo@adk.org website: www.adk.org
More informationMANAGEMENT DIRECTION STATEMENT June, 1999
Thompson River District MANAGEMENT DIRECTION STATEMENT June, 1999 for Clearwater River Corridor (Addition to Wells Gray Park) Ministry of Environment Lands and Parks BC Parks Division ii Table of Contents
More informationGlobal Sustainable Tourism Destinations Criteria
Global Sustainable Tourism Destinations Criteria Draft destination level Global Sustainable Tourism Criteria as proposed after Destinations and International Standards joint working group meeting and follow-up
More informationGeneral Regulations Governing sawmill, lumber, mining and construction camps
SAWMILL, LUMBER, MINING AND 1 General Regulations Governing sawmill, lumber, mining and construction camps Repealed by Chapter P-37.1 Reg 10 (effective December 5, 2002). Formerly Saskatchewan Regulations
More informationRecreation Opportunity Spectrum for River Management v
Recreation Opportunity Spectrum for Management v. 120803 Introduction The following Recreation Opportunity Spectrum (ROS) characterizations and matrices mirror the presentation in the ROS Primer and Field
More informationNational Park Service Proposed 2005 Management Policies Revision
February 16, 2006 Bernard Fagan, Room 7252 National Park Service Office of Policy 1849 C Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20240 RE: National Park Service Proposed 2005 Management Policies Revision Dear Mr.
More informationComments on Grand Canyon National Park Environmental Assessment April, 2010
Comments on Grand Canyon National Park Environmental Assessment April, 2010 The purpose of this EA is to examine environmental impacts associated with the proposal to make changes to stock use and mule
More informationChetco River Kayaking Permit
Decision Memo USDA Forest Service Rogue River-Siskiyou National Forest Gold Beach Ranger District - Curry County, Oregon Wild Rivers Ranger District Josephine County, Oregon BACKGROUND A special use permit
More informationRUSHMORE CONNECTOR TRAIL PROPOSAL
PURPOSE AND NEED Background The U.S. Forest Service, Black Hills National Forest (Forest Service) has received a special use permit application from the State of South Dakota Department of Game, Fish and
More informationCreating a User-Driven Long-Distance OHV Trail Through Partnering
Joseph Raffaele Outdoor Recreation Planner U.S. Bureau of Land Management Yuma, Arizona Creating a User-Driven Long-Distance OHV Trail Through Partnering BLM is a multiple-use land management agency within
More informationCITY OF ANAHUAC ORDINANCE NO RECREATIONAL VEHICLE PARKS
CITY OF ANAHUAC ORDINANCE NO. 2014-04-04 RECREATIONAL VEHICLE PARKS AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHUAC, TEXAS REGARDING THE PLACING AND LOCATION OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLE PARKS TO BE LOCATED WITHIN THE
More informationCODE OF CONDUCT. Corporate Compliance 10.9 Effective: 12/17/13 Reviewed: 1/04/17 Revised: 1/04/17
Corporate Compliance 10.9 Effective: 12/17/13 Reviewed: 1/04/17 Revised: 1/04/17 1. POLICY This policy defines the commitment that PHI Air Medical, L.L.C has to conducting our activities in full compliance
More informationSasagiu Rapids Provincial Park. Draft Management Plan
Sasagiu Rapids Provincial Park Draft Management Plan 2 Sasagiu Rapids Provincial Park Table of Contents 1. Introduction... 3 2. Background and Park Attributes... 3 2.1 Park History.... 3 2.2 Natural Features...
More informationWilderness Watch P.O. Box 9175 Missoula, Montana phone: (406)
Wilderness Watch P.O. Box 9175 Missoula, Montana 59807 phone: (406) 542-2048 BEFORE THE REGIONAL FORESTER, REGION SIX U.S. FOREST SERVICE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Wilderness Watch ) ) )
More informationMarch 18, VIA U.S. CERTIFIED MAIL Don Neubacher Superintendent Yosemite National Park Attn: Tuolumne River Plan P.O. Box 577 Yosemite, CA 95389
THE GARDEN 901 North Pitt Street Suite 325 Alexandria, VA 22314 LAW FIRM P.C. (703) 535-5565 (703) 997-1330 fax kevin@gardenlawfirm.com VIA U.S. CERTIFIED MAIL Don Neubacher Superintendent Yosemite National
More informationFigure 1-Example of terracing from livestock
To: District Ranger Matt Janowiak April 3, 2016 P.O. Box 439, Bayfield, CO 81122 comments-rocky-mountain-san-juan-columbine@fs.fed.us From: Greg Warren Golden, CO 80401 Please consider the following comments
More informationYard Creek Provincial Park. Management Plan
Yard Creek Provincial Park Management Plan Draft January 2010 Yard Creek Provincial Park Management Plan Approved by: telàlsemkin/siyam/chief Scott Benton Bill Williams Squamish Executive Director ation
More informationRoadless Forest Protection
Roadless Forest Protection On January 12, 2001, after nearly three years of analysis and the greatest public outreach in the history of federal rulemaking, the U.S. Forest Service adopted the Roadless
More informationAppalachian Mountain Club
Appalachian Mountain Club June 3, 2013 Town of Alexandria Board of Selectmen 47 Washburn Road Alexandria, NH 03222 Re: Appalachian Mountain Club s comments on EDP Renewables building permit application
More informationAppendix I Case-Studies in Wilderness Management
Appendix I Case-Studies in Wilderness Management Management Issue Scenarios Note: These scenarios are meant to be used as guidelines for the program leader rather than to be read verbatim. Introduce a
More informationRule Governing the Designation and Establishment of All-Terrain Vehicle Use Trails on State Land
Rule Governing the Designation and Establishment of All-Terrain Vehicle Use Trails on State Land 1.0 Authority 1.1 This rule is promulgated pursuant to 23 V.S.A. 3506. Section 3506 (b)(4) states that an
More informationAccess Fund Scoping Comments to Tuolumne Wild and Scenic. River Comprehensive Management Plan/Tuolumne Meadows Plan and EIS
September 6, 2006 Superintendent Michael Tollefson Yosemite National Park Attn: Tuolumne Planning PO Box 577 Yosemite, CA 95389 Email: yose_planning@nps.gov Re: Access Fund Scoping Comments to Tuolumne
More informationWhite Mountain National Forest Saco Ranger District
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service White Mountain National Forest Saco Ranger District 33 Kancamagus Highway Conway, NH 03818 Comm: (603) 447-5448 TTY: (603) 447-3121 File Code: 1950
More informationJanuary 14, Orange County Transportation Authority Attn: M2 NCCP/HCP 550 South Main Street P.O. Box Orange, CA
Equestrian Trails, Inc. Corral 357 P.O. Box 1026 Trabuco Canyon, CA 92678 http://saddlebackcanyonriders.com/ President: James Iacono... 714-612-1789 January 14, 2016 Orange County Transportation Authority
More informationAmerican Packrafting Association P.O. Box 13 Wilson, WY November 3, 2015
American Packrafting Association P.O. Box 13 Wilson, WY 83014 907-947-6437 info@packraft.org www.packraft.org November 3, 2015 Josh Metten Bridger- Teton Organizer Wyoming Wilderness Association P.O. Box
More informationSummary Guide for the Merced Wild and Scenic River Draft Comprehensive Management Plan and Environmental Impact Statement
Yosemite National Park National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Summary Guide for the Merced Wild and Scenic River Draft Comprehensive Management Plan and Environmental Impact Statement January
More informationBuck Island Reef National Monument News Release Date: Immediate Contact: Joel Tutein, Superintendent, x 222
National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior www.nps.gov 2100 Church Street, # 100 Christiansted, VI 00820 News Release Date: Immediate Contact: Joel Tutein, Superintendent, Joel.Tutein@nps.gov
More informationDRAFT. Dorabelle Campground Rehabilitation
DRAFT Dorabelle Campground Rehabilitation September 2012 1.1 REGIONAL SETTING AND PROJECT LOCATION The Dorabelle Campground is located on the western shore of Shaver Lake in Fresno County, California (Section
More informationFinn Creek Park. Management Direction Statement Amendment
Finn Creek Park Management Direction Statement Amendment November 2013 Management Direction Statement Amendment Approved by: Jeff Leahy Regional Director, Thompson Cariboo BC Parks November 12, 2013 Date
More informationTahoe National Forest Over-Snow Vehicle Use Designation
Tahoe National Forest Over-Snow Vehicle Use Designation USDA Forest Service Tahoe National Forest February 20, 2015 Introduction The Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture will prepare an Environmental
More information2.2 For these reasons the provision of tourist signing will only be considered:
TOURIST SIGNING POLICY 2015 1. DEFINITION 1.1 A tourist destination is defined as a permanently established attraction which attracts or is used by visitors to an area and is open to the public without
More informationUNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT MANUAL TRANSMITTAL SHEET
Form 1221-2 (June 1969) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT MANUAL TRANSMITTAL SHEET Release 8-83 Date Subject 8353 Trail Management Areas Secretarially Designated (Public)
More informationBlueways: Rivers, lakes, or streams with public access for recreation that includes fishing, nature observation, and opportunities for boating.
Parks, Open Space and Trails PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY 2008 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TRAILS PLAN CONTENTS The components of the trails plan are: Intent Definitions Goals, Policies, and Action Strategies Trails Map
More informationDecision Memo for Desolation Trail: Mill D to Desolation Lake Trail Relocation
for Salt Lake County, Utah Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest Salt Lake Ranger District 1. Background The present location of the Desolation Trail (#1159) between Mill D and Desolation Lake follows old
More informationTemporary Campground Plan Review Application
Procedure to obtain a Temporary Campground Permit Step #1 At least fifteen (15) days prior to the opening of the temporary campground, operators should complete the plan review application (Page #2 to
More informationChapter 4.0 Alternatives Analysis
Chapter 4.0 Alternatives Analysis Chapter 1 accumulated the baseline of existing airport data, Chapter 2 presented the outlook for the future in terms of operational activity, Chapter 3 defined the facilities
More informationWhy is Wilderness Important? Does the American Public Really Care? Should it be managed? Why? Who should Manage it? How should it be Managed?
Why is Wilderness Important? Does the American Public Really Care? Should it be managed? Why? Who should Manage it? How should it be Managed? Shifting Attitudes Toward Wilderness The early conception of
More informationDecision Memo Ice Age Trail Improvement (CRAC 37)
Decision Memo Ice Age Trail Improvement (CRAC 37) U.S. Forest Service Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest, Medford-Park Falls Ranger District Taylor County, Wisconsin T32N, R2W, Town of Grover, Section
More informationWilderness Stewardship Plan Handbook
National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Wilderness Stewardship Program Wilderness Stewardship Plan Handbook Planning to Preserve Wilderness Character DRAFT April 2012 Wilderness Stewardship
More informationNinth Through Twelfth Grades
Ninth Through Twelfth Grades John Muir s Vision Lives On Unit Concept: John Muir s vision for the preservation of an ecologically sound natural environment persists today. Objective: In at least three
More informationSouth Colony Basin Recreation Fee Proposal
South Colony Basin Recreation Fee Proposal Purpose and Need for Collecting Fees in South Colony Basin: Forest Service appropriated funds have not been sufficient to maintain current recreational services
More informationLimited English Proficiency Plan
Limited English Proficiency Plan City of Boulder City Boulder City Municipal Airport Title IV Program, 49 CFR 21 About The Airport Boulder City Municipal Airport (BVU) is the third busiest airport in the
More informationJosh Clague, Natural Resources Planner NYS DEC 625 Broadway, 5th Floor Albany, NY Via
16 June 2017 Conservation Education Recreation Since 1922 Member Services 814 Goggins Rd. Lake George, NY 12845-4117 Phone: (518) 668-4447 Fax: (518) 668-3746 e-mail: adkinfo@adk.org website: www.adk.org
More informationDaisy Dean Trail 628/619 ATV Trail Construction
Background and Purpose and Need The Daisy Dean ATV Trail Construction Project is located in the Little Belt Mountains, Musselshell Ranger District, Lewis and Clark National Forest approximately 32 miles
More informationTheme: Predominately natural/natural appearing; rustic improvements to protect resources. Size*: 2,500 + acres Infrastructure**:
Recreation Opportunity Spectrum (ROS) Classes The Recreation Opportunity Spectrum (ROS) provides a way to describe the variations in the degree of isolation from the sounds and influences of people, and
More information