Wilderness Process #NP-1810: Your letter ID is NP September 5, 2018

Similar documents
Continental Divide National Scenic Trail Legislative History and Planning Guidance

Figure 1-Example of terracing from livestock

Draft Revised Land Management Plan and DEIS Comments

Wilderness Character and Wilderness Characteristics. What s the difference? Why does it matter?

Dear Mr. Robertson, Page 1 of 20

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT MANUAL TRANSMITTAL SHEET

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS INTERIOR BOARD OF LAND APPEALS

March 14, SUBJECT: Public input to the Bureau of Land Management, Gunnison Field Office, Travel Management Plan

French Fire Recovery and Restoration Project Wilderness Resource Impact Analysis

WORKSHEET 1 Wilderness Qualities or Attributes Evaluating the Effects of Project Activities on Wilderness Attributes

TONGASS NATIONAL FOREST

White Mountain National Forest Saco Ranger District

As required by 36 C.F.R (d), objectors provide the following information:

Hermosa Area Preservation The Colorado Trail Foundation 4/11/2008

Whitefish Range Partnership Tentatively Approved by WRP 11/18/2013!Rec. Wilderness Page 1

Decision Memo Ice Age Trail Improvement (CRAC 37)

RUSHMORE CONNECTOR TRAIL PROPOSAL

RE: Access Fund Comments on Yosemite National Park Wilderness Stewardship Plan, Preliminary Ideas and Concepts

Scoping Comments Forest Plan Revision Inyo, Sierra, and Sequoia National Forests

FOREST SERVICE MANUAL NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS (WO) WASHINGTON, DC

A. GENERAL COMMENTS:

Project Planning, Compliance, and Funding

GRAND JUNCTION FIELD OFFICE. Travel Management Plan U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management

Buffalo Pass Trails Project

April 10, Mark Stiles San Juan Public Lands Center Manager 15 Burnett Court Durango, CO Dear Mark,

S Central Coast Heritage Protection Act APRIL 21, 2016

CHAPTER I. PURPOSE OF AND NEED FOR ACTION

Thank you for this third opportunity to comment on the proposed revisions to the Coconino National Forest Management plan.

Description of the Proposed Action for the Big Creek / Yellow Pine Travel Plan (Snow-free Season) and Big Creek Ford Project


Arthur Carhart National Wilderness Training Center s Wilderness Investigations High School

Montana Wilderness Association v. McAllister, 666 F.3d 549 (9th Cir. 2011). Matt Jennings I. INTRODUCTION

112th CONGRESS. 1st Session H. R. 113 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

WILDERNESS PLANNING. Wilderness. Interagency Regional Wilderness Stewardship Training. Alamosa, Colorado - March 26-29, 2007

MONTEREY REGIONAL AIRPORT MASTER PLAN TOPICAL QUESTIONS FROM THE PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE AND TOPICAL RESPONSES

Appendix A BC Provincial Parks System Goals

Coconino National Forest Potential Wilderness Proposal

Decision Memo Broken Wheel Ranch Equestrian Outfitter Special-Use Permit Proposed Action

National Wilderness Steering Committee

Connie Rudd Superintendent, Black Canyon of the Gunnison National Park

Recreation Opportunity Spectrum for River Management v

Expanding Settlement Growing Mechanization

Superintendent David Uberuaga June 27, 2011 Grand Canyon National Park P.O. Box 129 Grand Canyon, AZ 86023

Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre and Gunnison National Forests Attn: Plan Revision Team 2250 South Main Street Delta, CO 81416

USDI, BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT BURNS DISTRICT HINES, OREGON 97738

November 28, Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre and Gunnison National Forests (GMUG) - Forest Plan Revision, DRAFT Assessment Reports

White Mountain National Forest Saco Ranger District

Submission to NSW Koala Strategy Consultation Process. March 2017

/s/ Robert V. Abbey Director

Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Merced Wild and Scenic River. Comprehensive Management Plan, Yosemite National Park, Madera and Mariposa

Pacific Northwest National Scenic Trail. USDA-Forest Service Pacific Northwest and Northern Regions April 2014

Tahoe National Forest Over-Snow Vehicle Use Designation

NATIONAL PARK SERVICE CERTIFICATION OF COMPLETED SEGMENTS OF THE NORTH COUNTRY NATIONAL SCENIC TRAIL

Dan Dallas, Supervisor July 3, 2017 Rio Grande National Forest 1803 W. Highway 160 Monte Vista, CO 81144

Piedra River Protection Workgroup Meeting #5 Feb. 21, 2012 Ross Aragon Community Center, Pagosa Springs

Minimum Requirements References in National Park Service Policy

BUTTE COUNTY FOREST ADVISORY COMMITTEE

Flow Stand Up Paddle Board Parkway Plan Analysis

1803 West Hwy 160 Monte Vista, CO (719) TTY (719)

Decision Memo for Desolation Trail: Mill D to Desolation Lake Trail Relocation

Chetco River Kayaking Permit

Daisy Dean Trail 628/619 ATV Trail Construction

David Johnson. Tom, Attached please find the final scoping letter and figures for your review. David

Special Recreation Management Areas Extensive Recreation Management Areas Public Lands Not Designated as Recreation Management Areas

Wallowa Falls Hydroelectric Project FERC Project No. P-308 Proposed Study Plans - Recreation August 2011

PAD-US 1.1 (CBI Edition) Management Designations. National Parks (NPS) and National Park

September 14, Comments of the Colorado Trail Foundation On the USFS Scoping Notice of August 13, 2010 RE: the relocation of the CDNST/CT Page 1

Lassen National Forest Over-snow Vehicle Use Designation

White Mountain National Forest

DECISION MEMO. Rawhide Trail #7073 Maintenance and Reconstruction

Williamson Rock/Pacific Crest National Scenic Trail (PCT) Project EIS. Notice of intent to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement.

TETON COUNTY WYOMING PUBLIC LANDS INITIATIVE: TURIANO TEAM PROPOSAL

National Park Service Proposed 2005 Management Policies Revision

3.12 Roadless Areas and Unroaded Areas

S. 37, Forest Jobs and Recreation Act (FJRA)

Bradley Brook Relocation Project. Scoping Notice. Saco Ranger District. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service

Sawtooth National Forest Fairfield Ranger District

Biosphere Reserves of India : Complete Study Notes

Pillar Park. Management Plan

Restore and implement protected status that is equivalent, or better than what was lost during the mid-1990 s

Roadless Forest Protection

Roadless Area Conservation; National Forest System Lands in Colorado. ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking; request for comment.

Kelly Motorized Trails Project Proposed Action

Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre and Gunnison National Forests. Oil and Gas Leasing Final Environmental Impact Statement

STEENS MOUNTAIN TRAVEL MANAGEMENT PLAN

Notification and Reporting of Aircraft Accidents or Incidents. and Overdue Aircraft, and Preservation of Aircraft Wreckage,

PROPOSED ACTION South 3000 East Salt Lake City, UT United States Department of Agriculture

Creating a User-Driven Long-Distance OHV Trail Through Partnering

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Dear Reviewing Officer:

Teton Basin Ranger District

Buford / New Castle Motorized Trail

FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT. Chapter 1 General Overview of Wilderness Stewardship Policy 610 FW 1

APPENDIX I STANDARD CONSULTATION PROTOCOL FOR TRAVEL MANAGEMENT ROUTE DESIGNATION

Blueways: Rivers, lakes, or streams with public access for recreation that includes fishing, nature observation, and opportunities for boating.

LESSON 5 Wilderness Management Case Studies

Roadless Area Conservation; National Forest System Lands in Alaska. ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement.

Deer Creek. Forest Plan Special Designations and Inventoried Roadless Area Report. Prepared by: Dan Gilfillan North Zone Recreation Staff.

Table 3-7: Recreation opportunity spectrum class range by prescription. Recreation Opportunity Spectrum (ROS) Classes

U.S. Forest Service - Pacific Southwest Region Dispersed Camping & Game Retrieval Guidance

Transcription:

Wilderness Process #NP-1810: Your letter ID is NP-1810-2602-96 September 5, 2018 RE: GMUG Wilderness Evaluation Revised Evaluation Criteria and Draft Report Forest Revision Planning Team: The Continental Divide National Scenic Trail (CDNST) travel route location is appropriately recognized in the wilderness evaluation criteria and the report narrative. However, what may be of greater importance to recognize in the wilderness evaluations are the conservation purposes of a National Scenic Trail. The National Trails System Act states that, national scenic trails, established as provided in section 5 of this Act, which will be extended trails so located as to provide for maximum outdoor recreation potential and for the conservation and enjoyment of the nationally significant scenic, historic, natural, or cultural qualities of the areas through which such trails may pass (16 U.S.C. 1242(a)(2); and that comprehensive planning will describe specific objectives and practices to be observed in the management of the trail, including the identification of all significant natural, historical, and cultural resources to be preserved (16 U.S.C. 1244(f)). To assist in communicating and recognizing the characteristics of a National Scenic Trail, I recommend that the Forest Plan and EIS adopt the CDNST definitions that are found in Appendix A. Recognizing the nature and purposes is important to understanding that protecting a National Scenic Trail corridor through protecting wilderness characteristics of roadless areas is beneficial to conserving landscapes. The nature and purposes of the CDNST are to provide for highquality scenic, primitive hiking and horseback riding opportunities and to conserve natural, historic, and cultural resources along the CDNST corridor (2009 CDNST Comprehensive Plan, FSM 2353.42, and 74 FR 51116 Notice of final amendments to comprehensive plan and final directives). Protecting the wilderness characteristics along the Texas Creek #167, Sanford Basin #170, Mirror Basin #169, Agate Creek #173, Cochetopa Hills #165, Cochetopa #141/#143, Carson #73, and Cataract #62 landscapes also protect CDNST values. Criterion 5, Question 5, Evaluation Considerations, describes, [w]hat are the current types and extent of legal requirements or restrictions within the polygon (i.e., designated critical habitat, National Scenic or Historic Trail, or Colorado Roadless Area), and to what degree do they contribute to or affect the agency s ability to manage the polygon to preserve its wilderness characteristics? The evaluation process should clearly recognize that a beneficial combinations of conservation protection for undeveloped federal public lands is overlapping Wilderness and National Scenic Trail designations. Each congressional designation offers protections that the other does not. Overlapping designations within roadless areas would help ensure National Forest System lands are protected for current and future generations by protecting wilderness characteristics and the nature and purposes of national scenic trails. These overlapping Page 1 of 6

designations provide a complimentary framework for a high-level of protection from overuse and development. Wilderness evaluations (FSM 1923.03) and NEPA assessments should describe the positive CDNST benefits if roadless areas along the CDNST corridor are recommended for wilderness designation. Protecting wilderness values would include establishing plan components that identifies recommended wilderness as not being suitable for motor vehicle use and mechanized transport. Management of recommended wilderness to protect wilderness characteristics support the conservation purposes of this National Scenic Trail and is harmonious with providing for the CDNST nature and purposes. The extent of the CDNST corridor core area to be considered for protection through forest planning is depict on the maps in Appendix B. Planning directives and the draft Wilderness Characteristics paper states, The forest supervisor will determine which polygons to further analyze in the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process. I would caution that this direction may be inconsistent with the NEPA requirement to take a hard look at reasonable alternatives. CEQ regulations 1 provide guidance regarding the agency s scope of actions. Aspects of an action that are inter-related should be considered during this process. If there are unresolved conflicts regarding alternative uses of resources, then a hard look at a reasonable range of alternatives will be needed. Final suitability determinations should be informed through NEPA processes. In addition, please recognize that until the agency issues the revised Forest Plan FEIS Record of Decision, no action concerning the proposal shall be taken which would have an adverse environmental impact or limit the choice of reasonable alternatives. Please consider hosting a field trip in the Gunnison area to review any proposed revised Forest Plan direction in relation to SBEADMR timber sales and the CDNST management corridor. Early this fall may be a good time to reflect on past and current CDNST management practices and to contemplate appropriate forest plan direction for the future November 10, 2018, is the 40 th Anniversary of the CDNST. Possible review sites could include the proposed Sargents Mesa, Divide, or Millswitch Timber Sale areas. I appreciate the planning team s consideration of previous submitted comments regarding wilderness evaluations. Thank you for accepting and considering these comments. Greg Warren NSTrail.org cc: Matt McCombs, District Ranger 1 36 CFR Part 220 does not lessen the applicability of the CEQ 40 CFR Part 1500 regulations on National Forest System lands (36 CFR 220.1(b)). Page 2 of 6

Appendix A. Glossary Continental Divide National Scenic Trail (CDNST). The National Parks and Recreation Act of November 10, 1978 authorized and designated the Continental Divide National Scenic Trail (CDNST) (Pub. L. No. 95-625, 92 Stat. 3467), which amended the NTSA of 1968 (16 U.S.C. 1241-1251): o CDNST Comprehensive Plan. Statutorily required plan providing direction and guidance for the administration and management of a congressionally designated National Scenic Trail or National Historic Trail. The plan includes the identification of the nature and purposes, goals and objectives, all significant natural, historical, and cultural resources to be preserved, carrying capacity, and high potential segments for the national trail management corridor. CDNST comprehensive planning is accomplished through staged decision processes. o CDNST Corridor. A CDNST corridor is referred to on maps published in 1978 as part of the establishment of this National Scenic Trail. The selected rights-of-way and management corridor extent must be of sufficient width to encompass National Trail resources, qualities, values, and associated settings. The Chief of the Forest Service is responsible for selecting the corridor for National Scenic and National Historic Trails and publishing notice of availability of required maps and descriptions in the Federal Register (16 U.S.C. 1246(a)(2)). o CDNST Designated Area. The CDNST designated area is the extent of the selected rights-of-way. Land management plans may describe the CDNST designated area as that of a management area or national trail management corridor. o CDNST Nature and Purposes. The nature and purposes of the CDNST are to provide for high-quality scenic, primitive hiking and horseback riding opportunities and to conserve natural, historic, and cultural resources along the CDNST corridor (2009 CDNST Comprehensive Plan, FSM 2353.42, and Federal Register Notice on October 5, 2009 (74 FR 51116)). o CDNST Travel Route. The CDNST travel route is normally a standard terra trail that has a surface consisting predominantly of the ground and that is designed and managed to accommodate use on that surface. A National Scenic Trail travel route is located within an established management area or national trail management corridor. [See FSM 2353.44b part 9.] Please see the CDNST Planning Handbook for additional glossary recommendations NSTrail.org. Page 3 of 6

Appendix B. CDNST Corridor Core Area and Wilderness Evaluation Maps Page 4 of 6

Page 5 of 6

Page 6 of 6