Environmental Assessment. Runway 14 Runway 14 southern departures trial Gold Coast Airport

Similar documents
Environmental Assessment. Runway 14 Smart Tracking Approach Gold Coast Airport

Runway 35 South & West (Jet) Departure Flight Path Amendment

Perth Noise Abatement Procedures - Change to Preferred Runways

GOLD COAST AIRPORT - Runway 14 southern departures trial

Perth Airport. Runway 21 Night-Time Departure Trial Proposal. Environmental Analysis Summary. August Airservices Australia 1 of 17

Environment Assessment of Darwin Airport Traffic Management Plan Effective December 2014

Perth Airport Aircraft Noise Validation Study Terms of Reference

Environment and Climate Change Unit

Gold Coast Airport Aircraft Noise Information Report

TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PLAN FINAL STAGE. Implementation of Standard Instrument Departure and Standard Instrument Arrival Flight Paths.

Gold Coast Airport Aircraft Noise Information Report

REVIEW OF GOLD COAST AIRPORT Noise Abatement Procedures

TORONTO PEARSON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT NOISE MANAGEMENT

HOBART AIRSPACE DESIGN

Gold Coast Airport. Aircraft Noise Information Report. Quarter (July to September) Page 1

HOBART AIRSPACE DESIGN

Noise Action Plan Summary

HOBART AIRSPACE DESIGN

Short Term Monitoring Program NSW, Carlingford Report. February 2013

Gold Coast Airport Aircraft Noise Information Report

SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT CITY & COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO MEMORANDUM

HOBART AIRSPACE DESIGN

Short Term Monitoring Program NSW, Caringbah Report. February 2013

Short Term Monitoring Program Tarragindi Report, QLD

HOBART AIRSPACE DESIGN

POST-IMPLEMENTATION COMMUNITY IMPACT REVIEW

POST-IMPLEMENTATION COMMUNITY IMPACT REVIEW

POST-IMPLEMENTATION COMMUNITY IMPACT REVIEW

REVIEW OF PERTH AIRPORT Noise Abatement Procedures

HOBART AIRSPACE DESIGN

LAX Community Noise Roundtable. Aircraft Noise 101. November 12, 2014

Short Term Monitoring Program Parkdale, VIC

Cairns Airport Aircraft Noise Information Report

Cairns Airport Aircraft Noise Information Report

Christchurch PBN Flight Paths Trial. Interim Report

Birmingham Airport Airspace Change Proposal

Cairns Airport Aircraft Noise Information Report. Quarter (July to September)

Canberra Airport Aircraft Noise Information Report

Canberra Airport Aircraft Noise Information Report

HOBART AIRPORT CHANGES TO ARRIVAL AND DEPARTURE FLIGHT PATHS

Departure Noise Mitigation Review. Dr Darren Rhodes Civil Aviation Authority 18 July

> Aircraft Noise. Bankstown Airport Master Plan 2004/05 > 96

Review of brisbane Airport Noise Abatement Procedures

UPDATE ON THE 6 IDEAS (1-4) NAV CANADA

Portable Noise Monitor Report

Portable Noise Monitor Report

Martin County Airport / Witham Field Noise Abatement Departure Profile (NADP) Demonstration Technical Report March 2010

Review of the Gold Coast Airport Environmental Monitoring Units (EMUs)

Sunshine Coast and Caloundra Airports Aircraft Noise Information Report

1.0 OUTLINE OF NOISE ANALYSIS...3

Short Term Monitoring Program South Dingley Village, VIC

NASA Low Boom Flight Demonstration (LBFD) Project Overview

Sunshine Coast and Caloundra Airports Aircraft Noise Information Report

STAFF REPORT. Airport Land Use Consistency Determination Betteravia Plaza. MEETING DATE: January 21, 2016 AGENDA ITEM: 8D

Sustainable Aviation: Progress Update. Dr Andy Jefferson to UK ACC s June 2018

Cairns Airport Aircraft Noise Information Report

Portable Noise Monitor Report

Portable Noise Monitor Report

Communication and consultation protocol

Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport (MSP)

Quiet Climb. 26 AERO First-Quarter 2003 January

Technical Report. Aircraft Overflight and Noise Analysis. Brisbane, California. December Prepared by:

Fly Quiet Report. 3 rd Quarter November 27, Prepared by:

Technical Report. Aircraft Noise Analysis. Portola Valley and Woodside, California. July Prepared by: Aircraft Noise Abatement Office

Federal Aviation Administration DCA. By: Terry Biggio, Vice President Air Traffic Services Date: June 18, Federal Aviation Administration

Opportunities to improve noise management and communications at Heathrow

FRENCH VALLEY AIRPORT (F70) Sky Canyon Dr. Murrieta, CA. Phone: Riverside FAA FSDO Complaint Line: (951)

Sunshine Coast and Caloundra Airports Aircraft Noise Information Report

Heathrow DET09 Steeper Departure Trial. Interim Trial Presentation Trial Data: January - June 2018

STAFF REPORT. Airport Land Use Plan Consistency Review: Old Town Village Mixed Use Project City of Goleta. MEETING DATE: June 18, 2015 AGENDA ITEM: 5M

AIRCRAFT NOISE INFORMATION PACK: CANNING VALE

Melbourne Basin Aircraft Noise Information Report

Gold Coast Noise Information pack June 2012

A380: Designed for Airports

Definition of overflight

Arriving and departing aircraft at Edinburgh Airport

AIRSPACE CHANGE COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT REPORT

Heathrow Community Noise and Track-keeping Report: Burhill

Melbourne Basin Aircraft Noise Information Report

Portable Noise Monitor Report

Canberra Airport Aircraft Noise Information Report

Portable Noise Monitor Report

Ted Stevens Anchorage International Airport FAR Part 150 Study Update Glossary of Common Acoustic and Air Traffic Control Terms

Melbourne Basin Aircraft Noise Information Report

Portable Noise Monitor Report

Dublin Airport - Noise Management Plan

Noise Oversight Committee

Massport and FAA RNAV Pilot Study Overview Briefing to Massport CAC. December 8, 2016

Pacifica. Short Term Aircraft Noise Monitoring

HEATHROW COMMUNITY NOISE FORUM

Airport Noise Management Report 2nd Quarter 2016

Airport Noise Modelling ACNCC Meeting October 15, 2009

MINNEAPOLIS-ST. PAUL PUBLIC INPUT MEETING 3 RD QUARTER 2016 INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT (MSP)

Airport Noise Management Annual Report 2016

RNP Solutions in Australia Australia s PBN Transition brings Opportunities for Active Noise Abatement.

Canberra International Airport

Noise data for the first 17 months of Boeing 787 operations at Heathrow airport

Runway 35 South and West (Jet) Departure Flight Path Amendment

TECHNICAL NOTE: Edinburgh Airport new SIDs ACP reworking of noise contours for revised Runway 06 SIDs

AIRSPACE CHANGE COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT REPORT

Transcription:

Environmental Assessment Runway 14 Runway 14 southern departures trial Gold Coast Airport

Change Summary Version Date Change Description Amended by 1 21/11/14 New document Community Relations 2 17/12/15 For consistency in documents title changed from Runway 14 APAGI SID re-alignment Gold Coast Airport Community Relations to Runway 14 southern departures trial Gold Coast Airport 2

Table of contents Assessment... 5 Assumptions... 5 Nominated Aircraft... 5 How is noise measured?... 5 Findings... 8 Number of aircraft... 8 Natural environment... 9 Cultural and heritage values... 9 Conclusion... 9 3

Introduction Aircraft depart Gold Coast Airport in accordance with Standard Instrument Departure (SID) procedures. These procedures are written instructions for the pilot to track according to a series of waypoints (three-dimensional points in the sky) - aircraft speed and climb gradient requirements are usually included. Some aircraft departing from Runway 14 (to the south) fly over residential areas near the airport, including Banora Point and Chinderah. The proposed change aims to reduce the noise impacts for residents by directing jet departures using the APAGI SID from Runway 14 to the south-west to maximise tracking over the Banora Point Golf Course. The current and proposed flight paths are shown in Figure 1 below. Figure 1 current flight path (blue) and proposed trial flight path (orange). 4

Assessment Assumptions The assessment was based on the following assumptions: Aircraft movement data for calendar year 2013 Proportion of aircraft departures from Runway 14 via the APAGI SID Jet aircraft movements only considered Nominated Aircraft As shown in Tables 1 and 2 below, there were 13,283 jet departures from Runway 14 in 2013. Of these, 10,228 (77%) followed the APAGI SID heading to destinations to the south and west of the airport (from Sydney across to Perth). The Airbus A320 was the most commonly used jet aircraft type departing from this runway. Table 1 - Gold Coast Airport Runway 14 departures in 2013 APAGI Other SIDs Total Total jet departures 203 10,228 3,055 13,283 Percentage 77% 23% 100% Average/Month 852 255 1,107 Average/Week 197 59 255 Average/Day 28 8 36 Table 2 - Runway 14 most common aircraft type Aircraft Type Aircraft Type Airbus A320 5,948 Boeing B738 4,002 Airbus A321 749 Airbus A332 358 Airbus A333 185 On average, there 36 jet departures a day from Runway 14 per day, 28 used the APAGI SID. The number of flights on the APAGI SID ranged from nil to 60. How is noise measured? Noise is measured using A-weighted decibels (dba) which is a representation of the loudness of sounds in the air as perceived by the human ear. To measure the maximum sound level of a single noise event, (LAmax) is calculated. This indicates the highest noise level a person on the ground would hear from a single aircraft overflight (arrival or departure). The noise metrics used in this assessment provide information on the noise of individual over flights and the number of noise events to be considered for all areas situated under a flight path and 5

the procedure associated with the proposed flight path realignment. It is known that the potential impact of noise upon communities will vary dependent upon land use, with urban areas frequently reporting a higher acceptance of increased noise levels than rural areas-reflecting higher ambient noise levels associated with transport, traffic and other activities. Airservices has noted that the following threshold values have been observed as reliable indicators of increased community awareness of aircraft noise changes in urban areas, and these have been applied in order to determine potential significance as defined in Section 160 of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cth). These threshold levels have been established by Airservices following consultation with community groups regarding the level at which aircraft noise and/or movement changes are generally noticed by members of the public, and may also be an indicator of community annoyance factors in response to aircraft noise changes. The change in LAmax noise levels with reference to how people may perceive the sound is outlined below; noting that each individual may experience sound, and perceive changes in noise levels, differently. LAmax noise level changes of up to 3 dba are not likely to be perceptible LAmax noise level changes of between 3 dba and 5 db) may be perceptible LAmax noise level increases of between 5 dba and 10 dba are likely to be perceptible LAmax noise levels of greater than 10 dba may be perceived as twice as loud For areas receiving a high level (10 or more noise events of 70 dba or louder per day) of existing over flights: An increase by 25% in the number of noise events at or above 70 dba from 7am-10pm An increase by 25% in the number of noise events at or above 60 dba from 7am-10pm An increase by 10% in the number of noise events at or above 60 dba from 10pm-7am Any increase in the number of noise events at or above 70 dba from 10pm-7am For areas not receiving a high level (10 or more noise events of 70 dba or louder per day) of existing aircraft over flights: An increase of 10 noise events at or above 70 dba from 7am-10pm An increase of 50 noise events at or above 60 dba from 7am-10pm An increase of 3 noise events at or above 60 dba from 10pm-7am 6

Above are some comparisons of sound levels most of us would experience on a regular basis. 7

Findings Number of aircraft There would be no change resulting from this proposal in the number of aircraft using the APAGI SID. Noise An analysis of departures has been undertaken; modelling was done for the A320 aircraft type as it is currently the aircraft type most frequently using this departure procedure. Seven reference locations were selected for analysis: five north of the Tweed River (all within Banora Point) and two south of the Tweed River. The expected change in noise impact for residential areas located north of the Tweed River are minor and are not likely to be noticeable. The change in noise levels for these areas range from nil to +2 dba as shown in Table 3 below. For communities south of the Tweed River, it is expected there will be a reduction in aircraft noise at Chinderah. This change is estimated to be a decrease of 5 dba which will be noticeable. There may, however, be an increase in the noise level of some aircraft flying over the Stotts Creek area with some aircraft perceived as being twice as loud. This is a rural area which is sparsely populated and used for forestry (sawmill), horticulture and sugar cane production. It is already occasionally overflown by the same aircraft. A different level of noise impact from aircraft may or may not be noticeable and/or considered to be intrusive by the people of this area. The proposed flight path realignment is likely to result in a reduction in total population exposed to aircraft noise from jet aircraft departing Runway 14. These reductions include a reduction of 500 persons exposed to the 70 dba noise contour. Table 3 Change in noise levels Location Before After Change Banora Point (north) 78 79 +1 (Aveo Retirement Village) Banora Point (north) 73 73 nil (Cnr Tralee and Darlington Drive) Banora Point (south) 71 72 +1 (Cnr Kildare Drive and Dromara Cct) Banora Point (south) 70 72 +2 (Cnr Old Ferry Rd and Mariners Cct) Banora Point (south-west) 67 69 +2 Cnr Lochlomond Drive and Stonehaven Way) Chinderah 69 64-5 (Tweed Caravan Park) Stotts Creek (Cnr Pacific Hwy and Cudgen Rd) 52 67 +15 8

Aircraft emissions There are no additional aircraft emissions resulting from the proposed realignment. Natural environment The proposed realignment does not newly expose any areas of natural environment significance to aircraft over flight or noise. Cultural and heritage values The Minjungbal People are acknowledged as the traditional custodians of the land overflown by the current and proposed flight path. A cultural and heritage values analysis indicated there would be no cultural or heritage issues resulting from implementing the proposed flight path realignment. Conclusion The proposed re-alignment of the Gold Coast APAGI SID from Runway 14 is expected to direct flights away from residents of Chinderah and therefore provides a potential benefit to those residents. There would be no noticeable difference in noise levels for residents of Banora Point. More aircraft would be tracking over Stotts Creek, with some perceived as being twice as loud as those using the current flight path which is a small distance to the east of this area. This difference in noise impact is likely to be noticeable. As this is a sparsely populated rural area, more data is required (including from noise monitoring and community feedback analysis) to determine whether the noise change would be considered intrusive and therefore potentially significant under the terms of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cth). 9