GATEWAY PHASE 2. U.S. Forest Service and the Mount Shasta Trails Association

Similar documents
Preferred Recreation Recommendations Stemilt-Squilchuck Recreation Plan March 2018

System Group Meeting #1. March 2014

Trails Technical Committee

Mt. Hood National Forest

Thank you for this third opportunity to comment on the proposed revisions to the Coconino National Forest Management plan.

Trail Phasing Plan. Note: Trails in the Clear Creek Canyon area (Segments will be finalized in the future to minimize wildlife impacts

RUSHMORE CONNECTOR TRAIL PROPOSAL

Logo Department Name Agency Organization Organization Address Information 5700 North Sabino Canyon Road

Mickelson Connector Feasibility Study

To: Cam Hooley From: Trails 2000 Date: September 30, 2016 Re: Hermosa Comments. Dear Cam:

Understanding the caring capacity of the visitor experience Provide facilities to support a high level user experience Address visual quality through

A Publication of Friends of Sleeping Bear Dunes

CHAPTER 5. Chapter 5 Recreation Element

ROAD AND TRAIL PROJECT APPROVAL

Proposal to Redevelop Lower Kananaskis River-Barrier Lake. Bow Valley Provincial Park. Frequently Asked Questions

RECREATION. Seven issues were identified that pertain to the effects of travel management on outdoor recreation within portions of the project area.

Understanding user expectations And planning for long term sustainability 1

Thank you for this second opportunity to comment on the proposed revisions to the Coconino National Forest Management plan.

The Chu property is a 6.57 acre parcel located in the Town of Superior on the west side of McCaslin Boulevard. In 2014, the Town of Superior acquired

September 14, Comments of the Colorado Trail Foundation On the USFS Scoping Notice of August 13, 2010 RE: the relocation of the CDNST/CT Page 1

Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Merced Wild and Scenic River. Comprehensive Management Plan, Yosemite National Park, Madera and Mariposa

CHAPTER III: TRAIL DESIGN STANDARDS, SPECIFICATIONS & PERMITS

Proposal to Redevelop Lower Kananaskis River-Barrier Lake. Bow Valley Provincial Park

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed action to add trails and trailheads to the Red Rock District trail system.

FEASIBILITY CRITERIA

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Mount Elden/Dry Lake Hills Recreation Planning Proposed Action, (MEDL).

MASTER PLAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Mazatzal Wilderness Trail Maintenance and Exploration

National Outdoor Recreation Conference April 2018

Form for Project Descriptions - December 2013 version! 1. Stone Valley Cooperative Recreation Area (SVCRA) Project Description

Tracy Ridge Shared Use Trails and Plan Amendment Project

Table 3-7: Recreation opportunity spectrum class range by prescription. Recreation Opportunity Spectrum (ROS) Classes

Proposal to Redevelop Lower Kananaskis Lake Campgrounds in Peter Lougheed Provincial Park. What We Heard

Chatsworth Branch Library Devonshire Street, Chatsworth, CA Thursday, November 16, :00-8:00 pm

PROPOSED ACTION South 3000 East Salt Lake City, UT United States Department of Agriculture

Proposed Peninsula Bay Bike Track Development

USGS Efforts to Consolidate Geospatial Data in the Federal Government

Eagle Rock Loop Ouachita National Forest Page 1 of 8

INTRODUCTION. Mailing address: Burke County Community Development Attn: Tim Johnson P. O. Box 219 Morganton, NC

City of Durango 5.8 FUNDING TRAILS DEVELOPMENT

Stevenson Ranch Library The Old Road, Stevenson Ranch, CA Thursday, November 9, :00-8:00 pm

Crystal Lake Area Trails

Rogue Gorge (Mt. Stella) Roadless Area-- T30S R3E (primarily in portions of Sections 23, 26, 33, 34 & 35)

FINAL TESTIMONY 1 COMMITTEE ON RESOURCES UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES. July 13, 2005 CONCERNING. Motorized Recreational Use of Federal Lands

Blueways: Rivers, lakes, or streams with public access for recreation that includes fishing, nature observation, and opportunities for boating.

BACK COUNTRY UNIT PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE

WORKSHEET 1 Wilderness Qualities or Attributes Evaluating the Effects of Project Activities on Wilderness Attributes

F. Forest Recreation Management

AGENDA LANARK COUNTY MUNICIPAL TRAILS CORPORATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS

A summary of Draft Makara Peak Mountain Bike Park Master Plan

Zion National Park/Gooseberry Weekend

Trail Assessment Report

IDAHO STATE ATV ASSOCIATION, INC. an Idaho nonprofit corporation. GUIDELINES FOR DETERMINING TRAIL DIFFICULTY [adopted August 8, 2015]

INTERMEDIATE. mayorsmtbchallenge.org

Creating a User-Driven Long-Distance OHV Trail Through Partnering

Port Gamble Shoreline Area Conceptual Trail Proposal

2. Goals and Policies. The following are the adopted Parks and Trails Goals for Stillwater Township:

Salmo Ski Hill 2015 Operating Season SVTS Annual Work Plan

Buffalo Pass Trails Project

RE: Access Fund Comments on Yosemite National Park Wilderness Stewardship Plan, Preliminary Ideas and Concepts

PROPOSED PARK ALTERNATIVES

Piestewa Peak/Dreamy Draw Trail Guide

Meshach Browning Trail System at the Deep Creek Lake Lion s Club Park on Bumble Bee Rd.

LANDER AREA MASTER TRAILS PLAN. Lander Cycling Club November 2012

This Passport: Revised October 20, 2017, EAM # Discovering the Trails of Webster, NY

April 10, Mark Stiles San Juan Public Lands Center Manager 15 Burnett Court Durango, CO Dear Mark,

ICEFIELDS TRAIL - CONCEPT

National Forests and Grasslands in Texas

Hiawatha National Forest St. Ignace Ranger District. File Code: 1950 Date: August 5, 2011

Stephens State Park Trails

APPENDIX 5: JUNEAU NORDIC SKI CLUB MEMO

Table of Contents. page 3 Long term Goals Project Scope Project History. 4 User Groups Defined Trail Representative Committee. 5 Trail Users Breakdown

Non-motorized Trail Plan & Proposal. August 8, 2014

MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE

Larrabee State Park Trail Planning Public Meeting Comments

Rockford Park District Silent Sports Master Plan

PURPOSE AND NEED. Introduction

Trail Beginning Elevation: 7553 ft The Poison Creek Trailhead is located at the end of National Forest Road 646E (NF-646E).

Evergreen Trail School

4.0 OUTDOOR RECREATION 4.1 PUBLIC LANDS

TRUCKEE TAHOE AIRPORT DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTOR STAFF REPORT

White Mountain National Forest. Scoping Report. Presidential Range-Dry River Wilderness Area Trails Project. Saco Ranger District January 2014

TRAIL DATABASE SCHEMA (8/26/2014)

APPENDIX D: SUSTAINABLE TRAIL DESIGN. APPENDICES Town of Chili Parks and Recreation Master Plan Update

Lava Mountain Trail Distance: Elevation Range: Trail Type: Difficulty: Season: Driving Distance: Driving Time: USGS Maps: Pros Cons

Suggested Day Hikes. Mount Greylock State Reservation 3, 4 1, 2. Take a Hike! Things to remember:

Barbour Rock Recreation Trails Plan Columbia Valley Greenways Trails Alliance and Columbia Valley Cycling Society

Partners: Michigan California Timber Company Shasta-Trinity National Forest Pacific Crest Trail Association The Trust for Public Land

WASHINGTON STATE PARKS LAND CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM

GIFFORD PINCHOT NATIONAL FOREST

CIEC 9 PEAKS AWARD SUPPLEMENT POSSIBLE ROUTES FOR THE 9 PEAKS AWARD TRIP

Overview. Wilderness Act of Statement of Need. What is Wilderness Character. Monitoring Wilderness Character

MOUNTAIN BIKING THE CASCADE LOOP

Appendix C. Tenderfoot Mountain Trail System. Road and Trail Rehabilitation Plan

Appendix I Case-Studies in Wilderness Management

Segment 2: La Crescent to Miller s Corner

White Mountain Wilderness Trails

9 December 2016 Maxwell Wolckenhauer NYS DEC State Highway 10, Suite 1 Stamford, NY Conservation.

Daisy Dean Trail 628/619 ATV Trail Construction

Community Forum 24 October Resort Management Update

Transcription:

GATEWAY PHASE 2 U.S. Forest Service and the Mount Shasta Trails Association

PROJECT DEVELOPMENT Brief history - Gateway Phase 1 - IMBA conceptual plan - BikeShasta: concert series - USFS & MSTA partnered to complete the NEPA analysis MSTA is funding a consultant company to complete Environmental Assessment -- surveys required for various resources -- writing the resource technical reports Forest Service is reviewing stages of NEPA and serving in technical capacity

Identify need for project Develop proposal Scoping/Public Input Identify issues develop alternatives Effects Analysis Notice for Comment on Environmental Assessment/Public Input Notice of Objection on draft Decision Notice Predecisional Admininistrative Review NEPA PROCESS Issue Decision Notice Implementation

PROJECT PROPOSAL The purpose of this project is to increase non-motorized recreational opportunities for hiking, trail running, mountain biking and equestrian use around the City of Mt. Shasta by expanding the existing Gateway Trail system. Proposed Action This Proposed Action is intended to meet the need for additional non-motorized recreation in the greater Mt. Shasta area. The Proposed Action has four components: 1. Expansion of the McBride Springs Campground 2. Construction of a network of multi-use, non-motorized trails 3. Construction of additional trailheads 4. Decommissioning of unauthorized, user-created trails

MCBRIDE SPRINGS CAMPGROUND EXPANSION PROPOSAL Construct an additional camping loop Approximately 10-12 additional sites Tent pad Picnic table Fire ring Food locker Concerns with white fir will be mitigated with removal of trees

NON-MOTORIZED TRAIL EXPANSION PROPOSAL 1. Construction of approximately 45 additional miles of sustainable multiuse, non-motorized trails that vary in degree of difficulty Connect to the existing Gateway trail system Connect to the Mt. Shasta Ski Park 2. Development of 4 trailheads (2 are existing recreation sites)

Gateway Phase 2 Trail System Planning & Design Presented by: Andrew Pellkofer andrew@traillaboratories.com

Introduction Introduction Andrew Pellkofer Owner/Principal at TRAIL Laboratories B.S. Environmental Management & Protection Cal Poly M.A. Parks & Recreation Administration Chico State USGS, BLM, American Rivers, WA State Dept. of Ecology, Weyerhaeuser, Evergreen Mountain Bike Alliance

Outline Outline Planning & Design Conceptual Layout Field Investigations Proposed Alignments Questions

Sustainability What is a sustainable trail? A trail is considered sustainable when it allows users to enjoy an area with minimal impact to natural and cultural resources, requires only modest maintenance, and aligns with desired user experiences Environmental Protect resources Social Meet desired user outcomes Economic Minimize long-term costs Soils Wildlife Streams Vegetation Capacity Current use Unmet experiences Construction Maintenance Quality = Value

Planning & Design Identify Recreation objectives Setting characteristics Current use Environmental conditions Establish Trail user objectives Desired experiences and outcomes Design Conceptual design Field investigation Layout & flagging

Planning & Design Recreation Objectives Multi-Use Emphasis on Mountain Biking Stacked Loops Connectivity Setting Characteristics Rural Front country Middle country Current Use Non-motorized Environmental Conditions Pine plantations & mixed conifer forests Volcanic soils Variable topography Entrenched streams

Planning & Design Trail Users Mountain Biking Hiking Trail Running Equestrian Trail User Objectives Nature Escape Solitude Challenge Risk Fun Play Exercise Variety Connectivity Socializing Efficiency Experiences & Outcomes Developing skills and abilities Enjoying nature Reducing stress Restored mind Greater sense of adventure Improved physical fitness

Terms & Standards Multi-Use Trail: Allow two or more distinct user groups Preferred Use: Allow two or more user groups, but are designed to primarily accommodate the experiences of one of the users Single Use: Allow only one user group. Designed to offer targeted user experiences. *color denotes trail difficulty based on IMBA color coding (next slide) USFS Trail Class Design Standards Trail Class 2: Moderately Developed - Continuous and discernable tread, but narrow and rough - Single lane with constructed minor allowances for passing - Obstacles may be common, substantial and intended to provide increased challenge - Structures of limited size, scale and quantity, typically constructed of native materials - Natural fords - Route identification signing limited to junctions, and where needed - An overall feeling of natural and unmodified trail* *Not applicable to all trails

Terms & Standards IMBA Trail Design Standards and Ratings

Conceptual Layout IMBA Conceptual Plan (2013)

Field Investigation Funky layout Will stream crossings work here? More funky layout Very steep. Buildable? Goes through private property? What s going on with loop? IMBA Conceptual Plan (2013)

Field Investigation

Field Investigation

Proposed Alignments Mt.Shasta Ski Park Gateway Trailhead Community Zone Big Mountain Zone Learning Zone (Discovery Center) Existing Gateway Trails

Proposed Alignments Community Zone 5 Trails - Shared Use: 4 trails / 12.82 miles - Single Use: 1 trail / 2.17 miles (MTB flow trail) Design Objectives - Fun - Exercise - Variety - Socializing - Connectivity Narrative: Close to town and easy to access, the Community Zone is designed to build upon the existing Gateway network and create more opportunities to quickly get out and enjoy the forest. It also offers great access and a wide variety of trail experiences for campers at McBride Springs CG. 5 1 2 Gateway Trailhead 1 1) MTB Flow Trail: 2.17 mi., Intermediate 2 McBride Springs Campground 2) EMH Trail: 6.75 mi., Intermediate 2 3 4 2 3 4 5 Everitt Memorial Highway Existing Gateway Trails 3) KC Trail: 2.08 mi., Intermediate 4) Unknown Trail: 3.35 mi., Intermediate 5) Mornings Star Knoll Trail: 0.64 mi., Intermediate

Proposed Alignments Learning Zone (Discovery Center) 4 Trails - Shared Use: 9.48 miles Design Objectives - Nature - Fun - Adventure - Exercise - Challenge - Connectivity Narrative: With a trailhead at the Nordic Center, a short connection to the Mt. Shasta Ski Park, and mellow, rolling terrain with fantastic views all around, the Learning Zone is ideal for those new to trails. A series of loops allow users to begin easy, and add mileage if they feel up to the challenge. Ideal for families, children, and those new to trail based recreation. To City of Mt. Shasta (FS 31) 1) Everitt Hill Loop Trail: 3.73 mi., Beginner 3 2 2) Nordic View Loop Trail: 4.35 mi., Beginner & Intermediate 2 2 Mt.Shasta Ski Park 4 1 1 2 4 3 P 1 To Hwy 89 3) Ski Park Connector Trail: 1.04 mi., Intermediate 4) Everitt Hill Summit Trail: 0.36 mi., Intermediate

Proposed Alignments Big Mountain Zone(s) Community Zone - Upper Mountain: 12.9 miles - Lower Mountain: 9.13 miles Upper Mountain Learning Zone Existing Gateway Trails Lower Mountain

Proposed Alignments Big Mountain Zone (Upper Mountain) Everitt Memorial Hwy 1 5 Trails / 4 Connectors - Shared Use: 2 trails / 5.42 miles - Shared Use Connectors: 3.13 miles - Single Use: 3 trails / 5.35 miles (MTB Downhill and Flow Trails) Design Objectives - Nature - Escape - Risk - Fun - Challenge - Variety Community Zone 5 2 C 2 3 C C 4 1 C Narrative: Designed to provide a variety of trail experiences, but with an emphasis on mountain biking, the upper area of this zone is anchored at the Vista Point Trailhead along Everitt Memorial Highway. Functioning as a drop point for shuttle mountain biking, users can descend into the Community Zone, the south end of town, or the Learning Zone via an assortment of routes ranging from blue level flow trails, to black and double black diamond level DH trails. There are also multi-use connector trails throughout this zone, as well as a multi-use trail from the Vista Point. 1 1) Wagon Camp Trail: 3.56 mi., Intermediate 2 2) Vortex Trail: 2.11 mi., Intermediate 3) Pyroclasim Trail: 1.00 mi., Advanced 3 Lower Mountain 4 5 C 3) Portal Dust Trail: 1.86 mi., Intermediate 4) Purple Pyramid Trail: 2.24 mi., Advanced 5) Connector Trails: 3.13 mi., Intermediate Learning Zone

Proposed Alignments Big Mountain Zone (Lower Mountain) 4 Trails - Preferred Use: 3 trails / 6.94 miles - Single Use: 1 trail / 2.19 miles (MTB Downhill Trail) Existing Gateway Trails Community Zone 1 Upper Mountain Design Objectives - Fun - Play - Risk - Challenge - Exercise Narrative: With a proposed trailhead along South Mount Shasta Blvd., this area offers users a quick way to enjoy a fun, playful, and potentially challenging trail experience. Designed as a preferred use zone, and commonly known as a lollipop loop, this design offers users an out-andback experience with several options for the trip back down the mountain, or they can keep climbing and head deep into the upper area of the Big Mountain zone. *City of Mt.Shasta Trailhead is not part of USFS project proposal To Proposed City of Mt.Shasta Trailhead 1 1) Upper Bear Springs Trail: 2.19 mi., Advanced 2) Tarp Trail: 4.06 mi., Intermediate 2 4 3 3 4 3) Middle Bear Springs Trail: 1.19 mi., Intermediate 4) Lower Bear Springs Trail: 1.69 mi., Beginner 2

Questions Shared Use Trails: 30.85 miles Preferred Use Trails: 6.94 miles Single-Use Trails: 9.71 miles