Flight Path Option Design

Similar documents
Framework Brief. Edinburgh SIDs

Arriving and departing aircraft at Edinburgh Airport

Edinburgh Airport TUTUR1C Trial Findings Report

Edinburgh Airport Airspace Change Proposal. What we have proposed and why

What is an airspace change?

CAA MINDED TO REJECT EDINBURGH AIRSPACE CHANGE PROPOSAL

Doncaster Sheffield Airport Airspace Change Proposal for the Introduction of RNAV (GNSS) Departure and Approach Procedures ANNEX B TO PART B

Community Impact: Focus on Barston

London Southend Airport Airspace Change Proposal. Annex E to Part B of the Consultation Document Runway 05 Departures via CLN

CAA DECISION LETTER. LUTON RUNWAY 26 BROOKMANS PARK RNAV1 SIDs AIRSPACE CHANGE PROPOSAL

Community Impact: Focus on Knowle

GATWICK RNAV-1 SIDS CAA PIR ROUTE ANALYSIS REPORT

Feasibility Study into increasing the altitude of the Noise Preferential Routes (NPRs) from 3000 to 4000 feet

Birmingham Airport Airspace Change Proposal

Updates to Procedures at St. John s International Airport

Airspace Design Guidance: Noise mitigation considerations when designing PBN departure and arrival procedures

GATWICK RNAV-1 SIDS CAA PIR ROUTE ANALYSIS REPORT

Changes to your services

London Southend Airport Airspace Change Proposal. Annex B to Part B of the Consultation Document Runway 23 Departures via CLN

Naples Airport Authority Board of Commissioners and Noise Compatibility Committee Special Meeting on Central/South Florida Metroplex

NextGen: New Technology for Improved Noise Mitigation Efforts: DFW RNAV Departure Procedures

REVIEW OF GOLD COAST AIRPORT Noise Abatement Procedures

London Southend Airport Airspace Change Proposal. Annex D to Part B of the Consultation Document Runway 05 Departures via EVNAS LAM

3.1 Introduction In the, river flooding is reported across two distinct river catchments. Coastal flooding and surface water flooding are reported acr

Honeywell.com PBN Concepts Krakow, Poland

TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PLAN FINAL STAGE. Implementation of Standard Instrument Departure and Standard Instrument Arrival Flight Paths.

Canberra Airport Aircraft Noise Information Report

The Basics: where do aircraft fly and why? This section introduces some of the basic principles behind the operation at Birmingham Airport.

Hampton in Arden. Community Impact: Focus on

Swanwick Airspace Optimisation. Work Package 1. November 2016: v1.6

Canberra Airport Aircraft Noise Information Report

COMMUNITY NOISE MITIGATION SUGGESTIONS

KSFO RNAV TO GLS DEMONSTRATION

London Southend Airport Airspace Change Proposal

POST-IMPLEMENTATION COMMUNITY IMPACT REVIEW

Airspace Change Programme

RNP AR RWY 16 in Vienna Schwechat (LOWW) PBN based Noise Abatement

Glasgow Prestwick Airport RNAV1 Routes

HOBART AIRPORT CHANGES TO ARRIVAL AND DEPARTURE FLIGHT PATHS

LAX Community Noise Roundtable Work Program A1 Review of SoCal Metroplex Proposed Procedures and Suggestions for Comment Letter.

Environment Assessment of Darwin Airport Traffic Management Plan Effective December 2014

APPENDIX H 2022 BASELINE NOISE EXPOSURE CONTOUR

KPGD HIGH. Punta Gorda Airport Punta Gorda, Florida, United States. Diagram #1: KPGD Departures. NOISE ABATEMENT PROCEDURES by Whispertrack

POST-IMPLEMENTATION COMMUNITY IMPACT REVIEW

PBN Operational Approval Continental En Route Navigation Specifications

Design Airspace (Routes, Approaches and Holds) Module 11 Activity 7. European Airspace Concept Workshops for PBN Implementation

Canberra Airport Aircraft Noise Information Report

November 2015 Page 2

Birmingham Airport Airspace Change Proposal. Proposed changes to flightpaths for aircraft departing Runway 33

Airspace Change Consultation Document

Airports Commission s Senior Delivery Group - Technical Report Number 01

UK Performance-based Navigation (PBN) Implementation Status

St. Paul Downtown Airport (STP)

LONDON AIRSPACE CHANGE GATWICK LOCAL AREA CONSULTATION. Issue 1, May 2014

London Southend Airport Airspace Change Proposal. Annex F to Part B of the Consultation Document Runway 05 Departures to the South

Introducing RNP1 (RF) SIDs Airspace Change Proposal

Project Consultant (PC) Alternative 5 Runway 22R/L RNAV Departures

FUTURE AIRSPACE CHANGE

KSBP HIGH. San Luis County Rgnl Airport San Luis Obispo, California, United States

Leeds Bradford Airport Airspace Change Proposal. Consultation Document 14 July 2017

Edinburgh Airport Limited Consultation: A Draft Response Template.

Buchanan Field. Airport Planning Program. FAR Part 150 Meeting. September 28, Master Plan FAR Part 150 Noise Study Strategic Business Plan

HOBART AIRSPACE DESIGN

AREA NAVIGATION RNAV- MANAGEMENT

UPDATE ON THE 6 IDEAS (1-4) NAV CANADA

A Standard for Equivalent Lateral Spacing Operations Parallel and Reduced Divergence Departures

Leeds Bradford Airport Airspace Change Proposal. Environmental Impact Report

Cairns Airport Aircraft Noise Information Report

Federal Aviation Administration DCA. By: Terry Biggio, Vice President Air Traffic Services Date: June 18, Federal Aviation Administration

Thursday, November 8, :15 p.m. 2:30 p.m. David Chetcuti Community Room Millbrae City Hall 450 Poplar Avenue Millbrae, CA 94030

PBN Performance. Based Navigation. Days 1, 2 & 3. ICAO PBN Seminar Seminar Case Studies Days 1,2,3. Seminar Case Studies

RNP AR Experience. Phil Rakena PBN Project Manager February 2015

POST-IMPLEMENTATION COMMUNITY IMPACT REVIEW

Cairns Airport Aircraft Noise Information Report. Quarter (July to September)

Gold Coast Airport Aircraft Noise Information Report

East Hampton Airport (KHTO) Noise Abatement Plan 2016 Prepared by the Eastern Region Helicopter Council

PLAN Anoka County - Blaine Airport

HOBART AIRSPACE DESIGN

Review of brisbane Airport Noise Abatement Procedures

TECHNICAL NOTE: Edinburgh Airport new SIDs ACP reworking of noise contours for revised Runway 06 SIDs

Heathrow Community Noise and Track-keeping Report: Burhill

Opportunities to improve noise management and communications at Heathrow

HOBART AIRSPACE DESIGN

KTRK HIGH. Truckee Tahoe Airport Truckee, California, United States

EXPLANATION OF TPP TERMS AND SYMBOLS

NOISE AND FLIGHT PATH MONITORING SYSTEM MELBOURNE QUARTERLY REPORT JULY - SEPTEMBER 2011

NOISE AND FLIGHT PATH MONITORING SYSTEM MELBOURNE QUARTERLY REPORT OCTOBER - DECEMBER 2012

TANZANIA CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY AIR NAVIGATION SERVICES INSPECTORATE. Title: CONSTRUCTION OF VISUAL AND INSTRUMENT FLIGHT PROCEDURES

Table of Contents. Page 2 of 59

NOISE AND FLIGHT PATH MONITORING SYSTEM MELBOURNE QUARTERLY REPORT JULY - SEPTEMBER 2013

IRISH AVIATION AUTHORITY DUBLIN POINT MERGE. Presented by James O Sullivan PANS-OPS & AIRSPACE INSPECTOR Irish Aviation Authority

Airspace Change Programme

AIRSPACE CHANGE COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT REPORT

RNP Solutions in Australia Australia s PBN Transition brings Opportunities for Active Noise Abatement.

Cairns Airport Aircraft Noise Information Report

NOISE AND FLIGHT PATH MONITORING SYSTEM BRISBANE QUARTERLY REPORT JULY - SEPTEMBER 2011

NOISE AND FLIGHT PATH MONITORING SYSTEM BRISBANE QUARTERLY REPORT OCTOBER - DECEMBER 2013

QUIETER OPERATIONS A GUIDE FOR PILOTS AND CONTROLLERS

Cairns Noise Information Pack. December 2011

HOBART AIRSPACE DESIGN

Transcription:

Flight Path Option Design This paper provides descriptions of the flight path options considered for each route and the rationale for selection or rejection of the various options. For each route a representative set of options is shown overlaid on a map showing population density. This shows how the areas of greatest population are avoided at lower altitudes where practicable and compares the impacts or benefits of each option for the communities under the possible flight paths. The proposed RNAV departure procedures will be operated as noise preferential routes (NPRs). As such aircraft would be required to follow the routes until reaching at least 6,000ft. Once above 4,000ft Air Traffic Control is able to direct aircraft (vector) off the route towards their final destination, hence there may be some dispersal of the traffic above 4,000ft on some routes.

Flight path A Runway 24 departures left turn Flight path A to the south links Runway 24 to the point TALLA, from where flights join the en-route network A1 This route extends straight-out from Runway 24 over Livingston and Blackburn before turning south over Stoneyburn. More population are overflown compared to the preferred option, and the track mileage is greater resulting in increased CO 2 emissions. A2 This route extends straight-out from Runway 24 over Livingston and turns south over Blackburn. More population are overflown compared to the preferred option, and the track mileage is greater, resulting in increased CO 2 emissions. A3 This route is a close replication of the existing conventional route. This route extends straight-out from Runway 24 over Livingston and turns south over Addiewell. More population are overflown compared to the preferred option, and the track mileage is greater, resulting in increased CO 2 emissions. A4 This route extends straight-out from Runway 24 over Livingston and turns south over Polbeth. More population are overflown compared to the preferred option, and the track mileage is greater, resulting in increased CO 2 emissions. A5 This route extends straight-out from Runway 24 and turns south over the centre of Livingston. More population are overflown compared to the preferred option, and the track mileage is greater, resulting in increased CO 2 emissions. A6 This route extends straight-out from Runway 24 and turns south over East Calder. The earlier left turn avoids overflying Livingston and the population overflown is the lowest (of the feasible options). The track mileage is minimum, resulting in the lowest CO 2 emissions. A7 This route extends straight-out from Runway 24 and turns south over Kirknewton. The early left turn avoids overflying Livingston and the population overflown is the low (similar to A6). However to turn this early would not be safe according to PANS-Ops rules (internationally accepted guidelines for safe aircraft procedure design).

Flight path B Runway 24 departures straight ahead Flight path B links Runway 24 to the points GOSAM to the west, from where flights join the en-route network. The design for Runway 24 departures to the west is to keep the existing route to GOSAM (B5) and to introduce an additional, parallel route for departures to the west. This will serve to reduce the number of flights on the existing route, and reduce the noise impact on those living beneath the existing route. The route B options below are contingent on this requirement. B1 This route extends straight-out from Runway 24 and turns right as early as possible (over industrial areas of Broxburn). The route continues NW to Brightons/Maddiston where it turns west, parallel to the existing route (B5). More population are overflown compared to the preffered option, and the track mileage is greater resulting in increased CO 2 emissions. B2 This route extends straight-out from Runway 24 and turns right abeam Broxburn. The route continues NW to Maddiston where it turns west parallel to the existing route (B5). The population overflown on this route is the minimum, whilst keeping adequate separation from B5. This option impacts the fewest new people and would reduce the impact on those currently under the flight path (B5). B3 This route extends straight-out from Runway 24 and turns right abeam Uphall. The route continues NW over Dechmont, Torphichen to Avonbridge where it turns west, parallel to the existing route (B5). More population are overflown compared to the preferred option. B4 This route extends straight-out from Runway 24 and turns right abeam Dechmont. The route continues west over Bathgate after which it turns parallel to the existing route (B5). More population are overflown compared to the preferred option. The route is not sufficiently spaced from B5 for simultaneous operations. B5 This route is a replication of the current conventional GOSAM standard instrument departure (SID). Traffic currently flies this route to a close tolerance (using RNAV overlays). The route extends straight-out from Runway 24 and turns right over Livingston. It then continues west over Bathgate, Armadale and Blackridge. Our preferred option is that this route will continue to be used, however the traffic departing to the west will be split between this routes and B2. The population overflown by this route will be the same as the current day operations; however the number of flights per day will be reduced.

B6 This route extends straight-out from Runway 24 and continues along the extended runway centreline over Livingston, Whitburn and Fauldhouse. More population are overflown compared to the preferred option, and the straight-out route does not give any operational benefit.

Flight path C Runway 24 departures right turn to north Flight path C to the north links Runway 24 to the point GRICE, from where flights join the en-route network. C1 This route extends straight-out from Runway 24 and turns right over Livingston. The route continues NW to Westfield where it turns north and passes over Maddiston and Grangemouth. More population are overflown compared to the preferred option, and the track mileage is greater resulting in increased CO 2 emissions. C2 This route extends straight-out from Runway 24 and turns right abeam Uphall and over Dechmont. The route continues NW and turns north between Linlithgow, Bo ness and Grangemouth. More population are overflown compared to the preferred option, and the track mileage is greater resulting in increased CO 2 emissions. C3 This route extends straight-out from Runway 24 and turns right abeam Broxburn. The route continues north over Linlithgow, Bo ness and Grangemouth. More population are overflown compared to the preferred option, and the track mileage is greater resulting in increased CO 2 emissions. C3a This route follows the same path as C3 for the first turn but then routes due north between Philipstoun and Linlithgow (dotted red line) before joining route C5 over Crombie. More population are overflown compared to the preferred option, and the track mileage is greater resulting in increased CO 2 emissions. C4 This route extends straight-out from Runway 24 and turns right over Broxburn. The route continues north over Philipstoun and Champany. This route turns later than the preferred option and tracks directly over Broxburn. C5 This route turns right as early as possible after take-off. Smaller and slower aircraft will be able to turn over the industrial area on the east side of Broxburn and hence avoid the centre of Broxburn. Larger, faster aircraft will turn with a wider radius which will take them over the centre of Broxburn. The route continues north over Winchburgh and Blackness and over the Firth of Forth. By the time the flights cross the north coast of the Forth at Cromie flights will be above 7000ft. This option overflies the lowest population (even accounting for proposed development in Winchburgh). The track mileage is minimum, resulting in the lowest CO 2 emissions.

Flight path D Runway 24 departures right turn to south Flight path D links Runway 24 to the points HAVEN and TALLA to the south, from where flights join the en-route network. This route will be used predominantly by jet aircraft. D0 This route turns right as early as possible after take-off. Smaller and slower aircraft e.g. turbo-props will be able to turn over the industrial area on the east side of Broxburn and hence avoid the centre of Broxburn. Larger, faster jet aircraft will turn with a wider radius which will take them over the centre of Broxburn. The route continues north-east over Winchburgh to South Queensferry, it then routes along the Firth of Forth before turning south. By the time flights cross the coast at at Cockenzie and Port Seaton they will be above 12,000ft. This option overflies the lowest population (including proposed development in Winchburgh). D1 This route turns right as early as possible after take-off and routes via Winchburgh, Hopetoun, then along the Firth of Forth before turning south. More population are overflown compared to the preferred option, and the track mileage is greater resulting in increased CO 2 emissions. D2 This route turns right over Broxburn, then routes via Winchburgh, Philipstoun, Abercorn, then along the Firth of Forth before turning south. This route is based on a different RNAV coding (Fly-by, Turn to fix) to the preferred option D0. This would result in more concentration in the first turn, but gives a later/wider first turn. More population are overflown compared to the preferred option, and the track mileage is greater resulting in increased CO 2 emissions. D3 This route turns right over Uphall, then routes via, Philipstoun, Abercorn, then along the Firth of Forth before turning south. This route is based on a different RNAV coding (Fly-by, Turn to fix) to the preferred option D0. This would result in more concentration in the first turn, but gives a later and wider first turn. More population are overflown compared to the preferred option, and the track mileage is greater resulting in increased CO 2 emissions. D4 This route extends straight-out from Runway 24 and turns right over Livingston, then routes via, Dechmont, Kingscavil, Blackness then along the Firth of Forth before turning south. This route is based on a different RNAV coding (Fly-by, Turn to fix) to the preferred option D0. This would result in more concentration in the first turn, but gives a later and wider first turn. More population are overflown compared to the preferred option, and the track mileage is greater resulting in increased CO 2 emissions. D5 This route extends straight-out from Runway 24 and turns right over Livingston, then routes via, Dechmont, Kingscavil, Blackness then along the Firth of Forth before turning south. This route is based on a different RNAV coding (Fly-by, Turn to fix) to the preferred option D0. This would result in more concentration in the first turn, but gives a later and wider first turn. More population are overflown compared to the preferred option, and the track mileage is greater resulting in increased CO 2 emissions.

Flight path E Runway 06 departures left turn west Flight path E links Runway 06 to the point GOSAM to the west, from where flights join the en-route network. E1a This route replicates the existing conventional procedure. The route turns left after take-off, over Inverkeithing and Dalgety Bay, then the Firth of Forth to Blackness and Bo ness. By the time flights cross the coast at Blackness they will be above 7,000ft. More population are overflown compared to the preferred option, and the track mileage is greater resulting in increased CO 2 emissions. E1b This route is currently flown by some aircraft as an RNAV overlay of the current conventional GOSAM SID. It replicates the existing conventional procedure (but less precisely than E1a). The route turns left after take-off, over Inverkeithing and Dalgety Bay, then the Firth of Forth to Blackness and Bo ness. By the time flights cross the coast at Blackness they will be above 7,000ft. More population are overflown compared to the preferred option. E2 This route was explored with the aim of routing around Inverkeithing and between Rosyth and Dunfermline. However this would result in more population being overflown compared to the preferred option. E3 This route was explored with the aim of routing wider around Rosyth and routing north of Bo ness. However this would result in more population being overflown compared to the preferred option. E4 This route was explored with the aim of routing wider around Inverkeithing, Dalgety Bay and Rosyth, passing over Dunfermline at above 7000ft and routing north of Bo ness. This would result in more population being overflown compared to the preferred option, and the track mileage is greater resulting in increased CO 2 emissions. E5 This route was explored with the aim of routing wider around Inverkeithing, Dalgety Bay and Dunfermline. This would result in increased track mileage resulting in increased CO 2 emissions. E6 This route turns left as early as possible after take-off. The earlier turn is achieved by using a different RNAV coding sequence (fly-over, course to fix). This different coding allows smaller, slower aircraft e.g. turbo-props to turn more tightly, and hence avoid overflying Dalgety Bay and Inverkeithing. Larger, faster jet aircraft will turn with a wider radius which will bring them closer to Dalgety Bay and Inverkeithing. After the first turn the route is kept over the Firth of Forth until past Bo ness at which point the aircraft will be above 10,000ft. This option overflies the lowest population. E7 This route is similar to E6 but the first turn is initiated later. This option was investigated in order to assess whether the later turn reduced noise impact on Cramond (see L max noise contour comparison). Both option E6 and E7 were been evaluated for noise impact and there was little difference in impact on Cramond.

Flight path F Runway 06 departures left turn to north Flight path F to the north links Runway 06 to the point GRICE, from where flights join the en-route network. F1 This route extends from Runway 06 following the Cramond noise abatement offset. The route turns left 90 degrees to the north west at the earliest point (at the coastline). The route continues NW over Dalgety Bay, then Dunfermline and then on to Saline. More population are overflown compared to the preferred option. F2 This route extends from Runway 06 following the Cramond noise abatement offset. The route turns left 90 degrees abeam Cramond Island, then tracks over Dalgety Bay, then Dunfermline and then on to Saline. More population are overflown compared to the preferred option. F2a This route is designed to avoid direct overflight of Dunfermline. The route extends from Runway 06 following the Cramond noise abatement offset. The route turns left 80 degrees over Inchmickery Island, then tracks between Dalgety Bay and Aberdour. At the junction of the M90/A92 it turns west to over Wellwood to the north of Dunfermline. At Carnock it turns north west to GRICE. The dog-leg in this route is required to stay inside controlled airspace. The route cannot track from Townhill direct to GRICE without transgressing the airspace buffer requirements. The edge of controlled airspace is in the vicinity of Knockhill racing circuit. However in practice once above 9000ft (FL90) aircraft can be routed direct to GRICE by Air Traffic Control. This option overflies the minimum population. F3 This route is a close replication of the existing conventional route. This route extends from Runway 06 following the Cramond noise abatement offset. The route turns left 90 degrees over Inchmickery Island, then tracks over Dalgety Bay, then Dunfermline and then on to Saline. More population are overflown compared to the preferred option. F4 This route extends from Runway 06 following the Cramond noise abatement offset. The route continues north east beyond Inchmickery Island then turns left 90 degrees over Aberdour, Townhill and Knockhill. This route does not give sufficient buffer with the edge of controlled airspace. F5 This route extends from Runway 06 following the Cramond noise abatement offset. The route continues north east beyond Inchmickery Island then turns left 90 degrees between Aberdour and Burntisland, over Hill of Beath. This route does not give sufficient buffer with the edge of controlled airspace. F6 This route extends from Runway 06 following the Cramond noise abatement offset. The route continues north east beyond Inchmickery Island then turns left 90 degrees over Burntisland then Cowdenbeath. This route does not give sufficient buffer with the edge of controlled airspace.

Flight path G Runway 06 departures right turn to south Flight path G to the south links Runway 06 to the points TALLA and HAVEN, from where flights join the en-route network. G1 This route closely matches the current conventional departure. The route extends from Runway 06 following the Cramond noise abatement offset, then continues straight before turning right 90 degrees abeam Burntisland. It then continues to the south east crossing back over the coastline at Prestonpans, by this point the aircraft would be at least 9,000ft. This route does not give adequate separation from the preferred flight path for route H. G2 This route extends from Runway 06 following the Cramond noise abatement offset, then continues straight before turning right 90 degrees abeam Burntisland. It then continues to the south east crossing back over the coastline at Prestonpans. By this point the aircraft would be at least 9,000ft. This route does not give adequate separation from the preferred flight path for route H. G3 This route extends from Runway 06 following the Cramond noise abatement offset, then turns right 20 degrees over Cramond Island before turning right 90 degrees beyond Inchkeith. It then continues to the south east crossing back over the coastline at Cockenzie. By this point the aircraft would be at least 10,000ft. This route does not give adequate separation from the preferred flight path for route H. G4 This route extends from Runway 06 following the Cramond noise abatement offset, then turns right 20 degrees over Cramond Island before turning right 90 degrees beyond Inchkeith. It then continues to the south east crossing back over the coastline at Port Seton. By this point the aircraft would be at least 10,000ft. This route does not give adequate separation from the preferred flight path for route H. G5 This route extends from Runway 06 following the Cramond noise abatement offset, then turns right 20 degrees over Cramond Island before turning right 90 degrees beyond Inchkeith. It then continues to the south east crossing back over the coastline at Seton Sands. By this point the aircraft would be at least 10,000ft. This route does give adequate separation from the preferred flight path for route H, and also gives an acceptable buffer with the edge of controlled airspace to the east. G6 This route extends from Runway 06 following the Cramond noise abatement offset, then turns right 20 degrees over Cramond Island before turning right 90 degrees beyond Inchkeith. It then continues to the south east crossing back over the coastline at Craigielaw. By this point the aircraft would be at least 10,000ft. This route does not give acceptable buffer with the edge of controlled airspace to the east.

Flight path H Runway 06 departures right turn to south west Flight path H links Runway 06 to the points GOSAM and TALLA, from where flights join the en-route network. H1 This route extends from Runway 06 following the Cramond noise abatement offset, then turns right over Cramond Island. It then continues to the south east crossing back over the coastline at Portobello. By this point the aircraft would be at least 7,000ft. This route passes closer to the Leith coastline than the preferred route. H2 This route extends from Runway 06 following the Cramond noise abatement offset, then turns right over Cramond Island. It tracks along the Leith, Portobello coast 2km offshore and crosses back over the coastline at Musselburgh. By this point the aircraft would be at least 7,000ft. This route has been positioned further from the coastline in order to minimise impact on the coastal area and the city. Route spacing between H2 and route G5 is in accordance with CAA route separation guidelines. H3 This route extends further to the east before crossing the coastline at Musselburgh. However the distance between H3 and G5 does not give adequate route spacing in accordance with CAA route separation guidelines. H4 This route extends further to the east before crossing the coastline at Prestonpans/Cockenzie. However the distance between H3 and G5 does not give adequate route spacing in accordance with CAA route separation guidelines.