U.S. Forest Service - Pacific Southwest Region Dispersed Camping & Game Retrieval Guidance

Similar documents
Recreation Effects Report Travel Management

St. Joe Travel Management EA CULTURAL RESOURCES

Creating a User-Driven Long-Distance OHV Trail Through Partnering

Description of the Proposed Action for the Big Creek / Yellow Pine Travel Plan (Snow-free Season) and Big Creek Ford Project

RUSHMORE CONNECTOR TRAIL PROPOSAL

Tahoe National Forest Over-Snow Vehicle Use Designation

Ottawa National Forest Supervisor s Office

FOREST SERVICE MANUAL NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS (WO) WASHINGTON, DC

Mountain City, Ruby Mountains and Jarbidge Ranger Districts Combined Travel Management Project Final Environmental Impact Statement Summary Report

Draft Environmental Impact Statement

PURPOSE AND NEED. Introduction

White Mountain National Forest Saco Ranger District

APPENDIX I STANDARD CONSULTATION PROTOCOL FOR TRAVEL MANAGEMENT ROUTE DESIGNATION

Proposed Action. Payette National Forest Over-Snow Grooming in Valley, Adams and Idaho Counties. United States Department of Agriculture

Arizona Game and Fish Department Report for Inventory of Motorized Dispersed Campsites on the Tonto National Forest

BUTTE COUNTY FOREST ADVISORY COMMITTEE

Lakes Landscape Travel Management

DECISION MEMO. Rawhide Trail #7073 Maintenance and Reconstruction

White Mountain National Forest Saco Ranger District

Buford / New Castle Motorized Trail

Sawtooth National Forest Fairfield Ranger District

Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact

Williamson Rock/Pacific Crest National Scenic Trail (PCT) Project EIS. Notice of intent to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement.

French Fire Recovery and Restoration Project Wilderness Resource Impact Analysis

Fremont Point Cabin Reconstruction and Expansion Project Project Proposal & Public Scoping Documentation

RIM TRAIL EXTENSION PROJECT

Kiowa and Rita Blanca National Grasslands Travel Management Environmental Assessment. Recreation Specialist Report

Wilderness Process #NP-1810: Your letter ID is NP September 5, 2018

Central Cascades Wilderness Strategies Project

Cultural Resource Management Report Deer Valley 4wd Restoration and Blue Lakes Road Maintenance Project R

Lassen National Forest Over-snow Vehicle Use Designation

S Central Coast Heritage Protection Act APRIL 21, 2016

CHAPTER I. PURPOSE OF AND NEED FOR ACTION

Memo. Board of County Commissioners. FROM: Tamra Allen, Planner. Buford/New Castle Motorized Trail. Date: February 13, 2012

Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest Salt Lake Ranger District

Plumas National Forest Public Motorized Travel Management

Buffalo Pass Trails Project

National Wilderness Steering Committee

Decision Memo Broken Wheel Ranch Equestrian Outfitter Special-Use Permit Proposed Action

GREENWOOD VEGETATION MANAGEMENT

MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE

Lake Tahoe Shoreline Plan 03 Policy Topic: Access Issues

Special Recreation Management Areas Extensive Recreation Management Areas Public Lands Not Designated as Recreation Management Areas

White Mountain National Forest

Kelly Motorized Trails Project Proposed Action

Decision Memo Sun Valley Super Enduro & Cross-Country Mountain Bike Race. Recreation Event

DIRECTOR S ORDER #41: Wilderness Preservation and Management

BACKCOUNTRY TRAIL FLOOD REHABILITATION PROGRAM

Roadless Area Conservation; National Forest System Lands in Alaska. ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement.

SOCIAL CONFLICT BETWEEN MOTORIZED AND NON-MOTORIZED RECREATIONAL ACTIVITIES.

USDA United States ~ Department of A riculture

Wallowa Falls Hydroelectric Project FERC Project No. P-308 Proposed Study Plans - Recreation August 2011

Continental Divide National Scenic Trail Legislative History and Planning Guidance

PROPOSED ACTION South 3000 East Salt Lake City, UT United States Department of Agriculture

Keeping Wilderness Wild: Increasing Effectiveness With Limited Resources

Pole Mountain Travel Management Scoping Document

USDA Forest Service Deschutes National Forest DECISION MEMO. Round Lake Christian Camp Master Plan for Reconstruction and New Facilities

CHAPTER 5. Chapter 5 Recreation Element

Helena Hunters and Anglers Association s Objection of the Blackfoot Travel Plan.

Daisy Dean Trail 628/619 ATV Trail Construction

STONE MOUNTAIN PROVINCIAL PARK Purpose Statement and Zoning Plan

Wilderness Character and Wilderness Characteristics. What s the difference? Why does it matter?

1803 West Hwy 160 Monte Vista, CO (719) TTY (719)

Dear Reviewing Officer:

Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Merced Wild and Scenic River. Comprehensive Management Plan, Yosemite National Park, Madera and Mariposa

Decision Notice & Finding of No Significant Impact Middle Citico Equestrian Trail Network

MONTEREY REGIONAL AIRPORT MASTER PLAN TOPICAL QUESTIONS FROM THE PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE AND TOPICAL RESPONSES

Connie Rudd Superintendent, Black Canyon of the Gunnison National Park

Rocky Mountain Regional Office. 740 Simms Street Golden, CO Voice: TDD:

Reynolds Creek Motorized Routes (38815) Response to Comments

RECREATION. Seven issues were identified that pertain to the effects of travel management on outdoor recreation within portions of the project area.

Re: ATV Outlaw Jamboree and Failure to Require a Special Use Permit

Montana Wilderness Association v. McAllister, 666 F.3d 549 (9th Cir. 2011). Matt Jennings I. INTRODUCTION

Marchand Provincial Park. Management Plan

Recreation Opportunity Spectrum for River Management v

Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project (FERC No ) Recreation Resources Study Study Plan Section Study Implementation Report

Preferred Recreation Recommendations Stemilt-Squilchuck Recreation Plan March 2018

Wilderness Specialist s Report

camping means the temporary occupation of Crown land using a camping unit, but does not include commercial tourism occupations;

MANAGEMENT DIRECTION STATEMENT June, 1999

Fossil Creek Wild & Scenic River Comprehensive River Management Plan Forest Service Proposed Action - details March 28, 2011

FINAL TESTIMONY 1 COMMITTEE ON RESOURCES UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES. July 13, 2005 CONCERNING. Motorized Recreational Use of Federal Lands

2016 Regional Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) Grant Application

Lakeview-Reeder Fuel Reduction Project

System Group Meeting #1. March 2014

Draft Record of Decision

PUBLIC SCOPING MEETING APRIL 2018

Response to Public Comments

STUDY OVERVIEW MASTER PLAN GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

Case 1:12-cv JLK Document 36 Filed 08/06/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLORADO

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS INTERIOR BOARD OF LAND APPEALS

Flow Stand Up Paddle Board Parkway Plan Analysis

RECREATION. 1. Conflict between motorized and non-motorized recreation uses,

BACKGROUND DECISION. Decision Memo Page 1 of 6

David Johnson. Tom, Attached please find the final scoping letter and figures for your review. David

TONGASS NATIONAL FOREST

Airports and UAS: Managing UAS Operations in the Airport Vicinity

ARTWEI ARTWEI ARTWEI

County of Sonoma Agenda Item Summary Report

David Rak. PO Box 1852 Wrangell, Alaska (907) home phone

Transcription:

U.S. Forest Service - Pacific Southwest Region Dispersed Camping & Game Retrieval Guidance V1.2 May 3, 2007 1

Introduction For many National Forest visitors the use of motor vehicles on roads, trails and within small open areas is their form of recreation. For others, motor vehicles are used to access the National Forest for other activities. The purpose of designating roads, trails, and areas by vehicle class and, if appropriate, by time of year, is to prohibit indiscriminate cross-country travel, and enhance public enjoyment of the National Forests while maintaining other important values and uses on NFS lands. Step 4 of the USDA Forest Service (USFS), Pacific Southwest Regions (R5) five-step Travel Management/Route Designation process is to have an Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) conduct environmental analysis and prepare the appropriate NEPA document to determine what changes, if any, will be made to the current NFS transportation system. Questions have arisen regarding the scope of the analysis, and whether motor vehicle parking, dispersed camping and game retrieval should be part of this analysis. This document provides guidance for field units in determining the scope of the environmental analysis, specifically related to parking, dispersed camping and big game retrieval. Baseline Transportation System A National Forest should consider their current NFS transportation system as their Baseline Transportation System and the starting point for travel management analysis. Travel analysis helps to identify proposals for changes in travel management direction and informs the environmental analysis associated with those proposed actions (Proposed Forest Service Manual (FSM) 7712). Travel analysis is not a decision making process. Travel management decisions are considered and disclosed through appropriate site-specific environmental analysis in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) (FSM 7712.3 (1) proposed). To avoid duplication, site-specific environmental analysis for travel management decisions should incorporate by reference relevant information and analysis developed during the travel analysis process. Travel analysis identifies proposed changes in the forest transportation system, along with supporting rationale. The proposed changes should form the basis for the proposed actions and purpose and need statements in the subsequent NEPA process. Site-specific environmental analysis should build off travel analysis by evaluating in appropriate detail reasonable alternatives to the proposed changes identified through travel analysis (FSM 7712.3 (2)). 2

National Guidance As stated in the National OHV Implementation Team, Motor Vehicle Route and Area Designation Guide, there is no need to conduct an environmental analysis to designate those roads, trails, and areas on National Forest System lands that are already managed for motor vehicle use where: 1) Use will continue unchanged, or 2) Existing restrictions on motor vehicle use will be retained. The Guide refers to the current forest transportation system as the baseline transportation system, consisting of those National Forest System (NFS) roads, NFS trails, and on NFS lands currently managed for vehicle use, together with any orders or other prohibitions governing motor vehicle use. This baseline transportation system is deemed the starting point for environmental analysis. Proposed additions to this baseline transportation system, identified through the Travel Analysis Process, constitute the scope of the proposed action to be analyzed. Sample wording for the purpose and need can be found on pages 25 through 31 of the National OHV Implementation Team, Motor Vehicle Route and Area Designation Guide, and in the NOI/Proposed Action template posted on the R5 Route Designation team room. Road, Trail and Small Open Area Designations Once Travel Management Decisions have been completed the designations include the following: A designation for a road or trail includes all terminal facilities, trailheads, parking lots, and turnouts associated with the designated road or trail. The designation also includes parking a vehicle so that all parts of the vehicle are within one vehicle length from the edge of the road surface when it is safe to do so and without causing damage to NFS resources or facilities (FSM 7716.1 (1) Proposed). A Terminal Facility as defined in proposed FSM 7705 as A transfer point between the forest transportation system and forest resources served by the system or between different transportation modes, including parking areas, boat ramps and docks, trailheads, marine access facilities, airfields, and heliports. Dispersed Camping and Big Game Retrieval The travel management rule in 36 CFR 212.51 (b) states In designating routes, the responsible official may include in the designation the limited use of motor vehicles within a specified distance of certain designated routes, and if appropriate within 3

specified time periods, solely for the purposes of dispersed camping or retrieval of a downed big game animal by an individual who has legally taken that animal. In FSM 7715.64 (proposed) Big Game Retrieval and Dispersed Camping 1. The responsible official may include in a designation the limited use of motor vehicles within a specified distance of a certain forest roads and trails, and if appropriate, within specified time periods, solely for the purposes of dispersed camping or retrieval of a downed big game animal by an individual who has legally taken that animal (big game retrieval). 2. The authority in FSM 7715.64, paragraph 1, should be used sparingly to avoid undermining the purposes of the travel management rule and to promote consistency in its implementation. 3. The Regional Forester should coordinate designations within States and among adjoining National Forests to promote consistency. 4. Responsible officials should consider providing designated routes to dispersed camping sites as an alternative to authorizing off-route use under FSM 7715.64, paragraph 1. Big Game Retrieval The California Department of Fish and Game (CDF&G) define Big Game as Deer, Elk, Pronghorn Antelope, Wild Pig (feral pigs, European wild pigs and their hybrids), Black Bear and Nelson Bighorn Sheep. It is illegal to pursue, drive, herd, or take any bird or mammal from any type of motor-driven air or land vehicles, motorboat, airboat, sailboat, or snowmobile, except when the motor is off and/or the sails furled and it is drifting, beached, moored, resting at anchor, or is being propelled by paddle, oar or pole. During informal consultation between the USFS and the CDF&G associated with the R5 Route Designation process the CDF&G understood the agencies intent and were in support of our strategy for planning and implementing a system of designated routes in California and did not support the limited use of cross-country travel. On National Forest System Lands in California a proposed designation including the limited use of motor vehicles within a specified distance of a certain forest road or forest trail, and if appropriate within specified time periods, solely for the purpose of retrieval of a downed big game animal by an individual who has legally taken that animal should be analyzed carefully by your IDT and Forest Supervisor. These proposals should be submitted to the Director of Recreation, Wilderness and Heritage resources for consideration before being included in a decision. 4

Dispersed Camping It is well recognized National Forests have historically provided camping opportunities outside of developed campgrounds. This type of dispersed use has historically occurred adjacent to, or at the end (terminus) of, NFS roads, along side bodies of water, and at the termini of a vast network of unauthorized roads and trails. The development of these unauthorized routes has created a proliferation of routes and/or environmental damage. In addition, concentrated use areas have developed many of which are now devoid of vegetation due to extensive use. Use of these areas may be affecting the soil resource, water quality and wildlife habitat. The Travel Management Analysis and decision making process provides the opportunity for the responsible official to designate limited motor vehicle use within a specified distance of a designated route, and if appropriate within a specified time periods for the purpose of dispersed camping. It is recommended on National Forest System Lands in California a proposed designation including the limited use of motor vehicles within a specified distance of a certain forest road or forest trail, and if appropriate, within specified time periods, solely for the purpose of dispersed camping be no more than 50 feet from the end of a designated road or trail. Allowing a specified distance from an entire length of a road or trail should be carefully considered as it may create a cross-country travel corridor and be inconsistent with the intent of the Travel Management Rule. In addition, whether the limited distance is from the edge of an entire road or trail, or from the end, careful consideration should be given to vehicle class to avoid creating a de facto open area. Any roads or trails including a distance for dispersed camping would be proposed additions to the baseline transportation system, and as such, would need to be identified in the proposed action and are subject to environmental analysis. This analysis should include the area from the edge of the road or trail to the edge of the specified distance potentially affected by the limited motor vehicle use. Motor Vehicle Use Map The limited distance for motor vehicle use must be reflected on the Motor Vehicle Use Map (MVUM) in the Designation Tables (refer to National Motor Vehicle Use Map Production Guide) and through the use of the appropriate symbol on the map. It is recommended on National Forest System Lands in California these designations are illustrated on the MVUM as indicated in Figures 1 & 2. 5

Figure 1: Example - Road Open to Highway Vehicles Only In this example, a limited distance (R5=50 feet) for the purposes of dispersed camping is allowed along the entire road edge on road 20S05.4 and from the end (termini) of road 23S02.1. 6

Figure 2: Example Road Open to All Vehicles In this example, a limited distance (R5=50 feet) for the purposes of dispersed camping is allowed along the entire road edge on road 20S05.4 and from the end (termini) of road 23S02.1. 7

Depending on the travel management direction a unit pursues there could be a variety of combinations required to be analyzed and then displayed on the MVUM. The table below provides an example of the required dispersed camping table that must be included on the MVUM. Refer to the National Motor Vehicle Use Map Production Guide for more information. Dispersed Camping Route Number Distance/Side of Road Vehicle Type Dates Allowed Situation (Don t show this column on map 23S02.1 50 From end Highway June 1 Nov 1 Licensed Only 23S02.1 50 From end Same as permitted on road Same as permitted on road 8

The following is the R5 Regional Office Route Designation Contact list. Contacts Regional Route Designation Lead Kathleen Mick Step 1 Inventory Issues Step 2 Forest Orders GPS-Kathy Mick GIS-Mimi Cheng/Nora Hubbard Approval OGC via Kathy Mick/Colleen O Brien Policy/Process Kathy Mick Admin Record - Colleen O Brien Forest Order Maps Technical Advice-Daniel Spring Forest Order Map Printing-Daniel Spring Step ¾-Hybrid Steps 3 & 4 should now be combined and Forests should be making every effort to publish NOI/Proposed Action to stay in line with the MOI timeline Step 5 - MVUM Action Plans, Budget, Targets, Timelines Fiscal Records/Audit Preparation Policy/Process Kathleen Mick NEPA Advice Craig Snider/Chaz O Brien Mixed Use Analysis-Bill Fodge & Kathleen Mick ROW/Easements-Bill Fodge Policy/Process Kathleen Mick Roads/Trails Infra-Gary Lybrand & Mike Shannon(LPNF) Map Technical Advice Eric Schachtell GIS-Eric Schachtell/Nora Hubbard MVU Map Printing-Daniel Spring Kathleen Mick Kathleen Mick/Beverly Smith 9