KTRK Flight Tracking System, VNOMS, Altitudes and Positional Calculations

Similar documents
The INs and OUTs of ADS-B

Acknowledgements. Proprietary Information 1

Discuss issues observed during the trial and implementation of ADS-B including review items from ADS-B Problem report database ADS-B ISSUES

ADS-B Rule and Installation Guidance

GTX 345 Transponder & ICAO IFR Filing. Charlotte County Composite Squadron FL Feb 2017 Maj Dick Morrell, Lt Tom Britton

DEVELOPMENT OF COCKPIT DISPLAY OF TRAFFIC INFORMATION (CDTI)

! Figure 1. Proposed Cargo Ramp at the end of Taxiway Echo.! Assignment 7: Airport Capacity and Geometric Design. Problem 1

Flight Evaluation Schedule For GPS IFR Approval Primary Means Enroute, Terminal and Non-Precision Approach

SBAS as a solution for safe approaches in New Zealand and Australia

Navigation Systems. 1. The Chart Supplement provides a listing of available VOR receiver ground checkpoints and VOTs (VOR receiver test facilities).

Flight Inspection for High Elevation Airports

Using The Approach Planner

Federal Aviation Administration Early Implementation Experiences

8 Things Every Aircraft Owner Needs To Know About The 2020 ADS-B Mandate. Contents INTRO: WHAT IS ADS-B EQUIPMENT, AND WHAT DOES IT DO?...

Appendix E NextGen Appendix

SBAS IS the only effective solution for safe approaches at every airport in Australia and New Zealand NZ Airports Assn 10 th Sept 2015

MetroAir Virtual Airlines

New generation aircraft in the instrument approach domain. Jean-Christophe Lair Airbus Test pilot 1 st Feb. 2017

Commercial Pilot Practical Test Briefing

Product Description. SmartRunway and SmartLanding. functions of the. Enhanced Ground Proximity Warning System

1. Introduction. 2.2 Surface Movement Radar Data. 2.3 Determining Spot from Radar Data. 2. Data Sources and Processing. 2.1 SMAP and ODAP Data

Advisory Circular. Regulations for Terrain Awareness Warning System

Approach Specifications

Wide Area Augmentation System (WAAS) and Local Area Augmentation System (LAAS) Update

Airspace Encounter Models for Conventional and Unconventional Aircraft

Runway Incursion Preventive measures at aircraft level

Performance Analysis of Space-Based ADS-B

Head-up Guidance & Vision Technologies Enabling Safer and More Efficient Airline Operations

Captain John Martin Head of Flight Safety Programmes

Assignment 10: Final Project

Chapter 9 - Airspace: The Wild Blue, Green & Red Yonder

POST-IMPLEMENTATION COMMUNITY IMPACT REVIEW

RNP OPERATIONS. We will now explain the key concepts that should not be mixed up and that are commonly not precisely understood.

KGP 560. Enhanced Ground Proximity Warning System for General Aviation SEAMLESS SAFETY INTEGRATION THROUGH IHAS

GENERAL INFORMATION Aircraft #1 Aircraft #2

PBN and RNAV concepts

UAS to GIS Utilizing a low-cost Unmanned Aerial System (UAS) for Coastal Erosion Monitoring

POST-IMPLEMENTATION COMMUNITY IMPACT REVIEW

CFIT-Procedure Design Considerations. Use of VNAV on Conventional. Non-Precision Approach Procedures

Investigation Report

FSXmap.com. Interactive Airport and Runway map for Flight Simulator X

Introduction to Navigation

STUDENT PILOT PRE-CROSS-COUNTRY WRITTEN EXAM

AERONAUTICAL SURVEYS & INSTRUMENT FLIGHT PROCEDURES

BFR WRITTEN TEST B - For IFR Pilots

Anchorage ARTCC Phraseology Guide. Clearance Delivery Operations

POST-IMPLEMENTATION COMMUNITY IMPACT REVIEW

Garmin Pilot. Plan. File. Fly.

Guidance material. Performance assessment of pilot response to Enhanced Ground Proximity Warning System (EGPWS)

DO NOT BEGIN THIS WORK UNTIL YOU HAVE COMPLETED ALL REQUIRED ASSIGNED READING AND EXERCISES.

Don-Jacques OULD FERHAT VP Airspace and Airlines Services. Airbus. PBN Safety programs

Pat Reines Avionics Support for GBAS and Performance Based Navigation (PBN)

Review of. Skiathos X. Created by AeroSoft

PRO LINE 21 FOR KING AIR. Taking your Pro Line 21 King Air into NextGen airspace.

FLIGHT OPERATIONS PANEL

LOVE FIELD ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE QUARTERLY REPORT. October December 2016

ICAO PBN CONCEPTS, BENEFITS, AND OBJECTIVES

UPDATE ON THE 6 IDEAS (1-4) NAV CANADA

RV6 800ft aal 24:27 24:39 25:03 24:51

FLIGHT OPERATIONS INTRODUCTION ICAO Air Navigation Commission

USE OF 3D GIS IN ANALYSIS OF AIRSPACE OBSTRUCTIONS

Air Transportation System Architecting

APA NOISE REPORT. January 2018

Hidalgo County Drone Program. Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) Template. February 23, 2017

PRELIMINARY WEB DOCUMENT

AIR LAW AND ATC PROCEDURES

APA NOISE REPORT. August 2018

The organisation of the Airbus. A330/340 flight control system. Ian Sommerville 2001 Airbus flight control system Slide 1

APA NOISE REPORT. August 2017

HOBART AIRPORT CHANGES TO ARRIVAL AND DEPARTURE FLIGHT PATHS

Time-Space Analysis Airport Runway Capacity. Dr. Antonio A. Trani. Fall 2017

FAA Update. Dakota-Minnesota (DMA) Airports District Office. Federal Aviation Administration. Presented to: By: Date: South Dakota Airports Conference

PRO LINE FUSION UPGRADE FOR YOUR CITATION CJ3. Your all-in-one approach for airspace modernization and situational awareness.

FLASHCARDS AIRSPACE. Courtesy of the Air Safety Institute, a Division of the AOPA Foundation, and made possible by AOPA Holdings Company.

Poland Ground Based Augmentation System (GBAS) Seminar AGENDA. GBAS Overview (Honeywell: Pat Reines)

HOBART AIRSPACE DESIGN

ADS-B. Not just a mandate! Forrest Colliver Becker Avionics GmbH Becker Avionics GmbH All rights reserved -

FACTUAL REPORT AVIATION

Taking your Pro Line 21 King Air into NextGen airspace. Pro Line 21 INTEGRATED AVIONICS SYSTEM FOR KING AIR

EXAMPLE FLIGHT PLAN. Project Information UBC PRODUCTIONS APEX^ZERO. Prepared for: Paul Hodges Vice President, SFG Productions

Navigation at the. Federal Aviation Administration Crossroads

Taking your Pro Line 21 Hawker into NextGen airspace. Pro Line 21 INTEGRATED AVIONICS SYSTEM FOR HAWKER

28 January, 2010 New Delhi, India. Larry Coughlin. Airports Authority of India Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B)

F-16 Head-Up Display

CE 563 Airport Design

Short Term Monitoring Program Tarragindi Report, QLD

NOISE AND FLIGHT PATH MONITORING SYSTEM BRISBANE QUARTERLY REPORT JULY - SEPTEMBER 2011

Appendix K: MSP Class B Airspace

Short Term Monitoring Program NSW, Carlingford Report. February 2013

Learn NextGen Safety & Efficiency Advantages Provided Through ADS-B. L-3 Communications Proprietary 0

Garrecht TRX 1500 Traffic-Sensor

Cairns Noise Information Pack. December 2011

Time: 1111Z Position: 5049N 00016W Location: 1nm SE Brighton City Airport

Regional implementation of Electronic Terrain and Obstacle data (e-tod) (Presented by Jeppesen)

Overview of Satellite Navigation Transition. CAASD Industry Day with Users May 7, 2002

FlyXC.Tools. Quick Start Guide. A short introduction to FlyXC.Tools

ARCHIVED REPORT. Precision Runway Monitor (ESSR- 128) - Archived 6/2005

Date: 14 Jun 2017 Time: 1600Z Position: 5121N 00102W Location: 7nm NW Blackbushe airport

NOISE AND FLIGHT PATH MONITORING SYSTEM BRISBANE QUARTERLY REPORT OCTOBER - DECEMBER 2013

NAVIGATION: CHARTS, PUBLICATIONS, FLIGHT COMPUTERS (chapters 7 & 8)

Transcription:

KTRK Flight Tracking System, VNOMS, Altitudes and Positional Calculations Prepared by: Joseph A. LaMacchia August 17, 2015 Proprietary Information 1

Noise Complaint Details VNOMS Data and Flight Path Flight Tracking and VNOMS System Architecture N647QS Flight Path Data Accuracies of Noise Complaint System Altitude Calculations Flight Tracking XY Positional Accuracies Google Earth VNOMS Conclusions Agenda Proprietary Information 2

Noise Complaint COMPLAINT ID: 6082 COMPLAINT TYPE: Low OPERATION TYPE: Arrival RUNWAY: 29 A/C TYPE: C56X DATE AND TIME: Jul 28 2015, 06:20 PM POINT OF CLOSEST APPROACH(PCA): 0.08 nm ALTITUDE AT PCA: 7100 ft Proprietary Information 3

VNOMS Flight Data Proprietary Information 4

System Architecture KTRK VNOMS Display System KTRK VNOMS Central Processor with Barometric Correction KTRK Flight Tracking System Raw Data VNOMS System Performs Post Processing of Flight Tracks Adds Barometric Corrections to all Flight Tracks Displays Flight Tracks over Satellite Imagery Google Flight Tracking System Receives Aircraft Transponder Information Mode C Altitude Passes Raw Track Information to VNOMS without Barometric Corrections Uncorrected Barometric Raw Altitude Mode C Encoded from Aircraft Calculates Altitude using System Sensors when 4 Ground Stations receives transponder Mode C signal (XYZ Geospatial) Proprietary Information 5

Mode C Altitude Target of Interest N647QS Mode S Code A880AB Screen Shot and Video file for Target of Interest..\..\..\Documents\NavAid\Programs\Truckee\Board Meeting\Altitude Discussion\N647QS_rev1.avi Proprietary Information 6

VNOMS Flight Data VNOMS Flight Data Proprietary Information 7

Flight Tracking System and Aircraft Transponder Altitude Tolerances The following represents accepted tolerances that can occur in reporting aircraft altitudes: Aircraft Mode C Transponders +/- 100 Feet Flight Tracking System +/- 30 Feet VNOMS Tracking System using Google Earth Maps +/- 100 Feet References: FAA, System Performance Specifications, Google Forum Proprietary Information 8

Google Earth Accuracies In accordance with Google s Forum the following Q&A on accuracies are quoted: Question: Distance measurements appear very accurate but elevation measurements appear to carry a huge error factor e.g. measuring the elevation of a 3 km long runway gives me 110 m at one end, then it gradually raises to 115 m in the center, then it gradually drops down to 104 m at the other end. I know that the elevation is based on the average terrain elevation but the area used to compute the average elevation must then be very large in order to generate a 9 m error in the above example given that the closest building is 400 m away from the center line of the runway. Does anyone know: (a) the precision we can apply to distance measurements; (b) the area used in computing elevation data; and (c) the precision we can apply to elevation measurements Answer: For the benefit of other readers, there is an excellent document on precision of SRTM data at the following link: http://dds.cr.usgs.gov/srtm/version2_1/documentation/mil-pdf- 89020B.pdf. You are right in saying that we should look at elevation accuracy in Google Earth in the range of +/- 30 m. One interesting thing I noticed however is that Google Earth appears to apply an average of many sampled points in order to smooth the data in the horizontal plane (make the terrain look more flat). Proprietary Information 9

Flight Tracking Accuracies Fight Tracking Accuracies (XYZ) 7M RMS within 5 KM of KTRK is ATC Grade Accuracy..\..\..\Documents\NavAid\Programs\Truckee\Board Meeting\Altitude Discussion\20150729_010000_TP1Cat20.ast Proprietary Information 10

XY Positional Calculations To ensure positional accuracies XY, a test was conducted with a portable transponder, WAAS enabled hand held GPS, and the flight tracking system Proprietary Information 11

XY Positional Calculations The following are the results of the tests: WAAS GPS Position N39 16.086 W120 07.75 Altitude 6959 Portable Transponder as Recorded by Flight Tracking System Squawking 1205 N39 16.091 W 120 07.44 Altitude 7102 Proprietary Information 12

Conclusions The Accuracies of the Flight Tracking Data is +/- 10 Meters on Average Flight Tracking Accuracies Increase as You Approach the KTRK Airport Flight Tracking System had Target of Interest in Track from 18NM to Arrival on 29 1334 AGL ~2.15 Nautical Miles SW of Runway 29 Positional Accuracies are within Site Acceptance Test Results see slides 11&12 Citation 560XL arrival to 29 with a left base turn low over residence. Based on proximity to terrain, the aircraft operator and the local FSDO of the FAA were contacted. An ongoing investigation will continue. All parties, TTAD, FAA, & the Operator, including the commenter are making this a priority Proprietary Information 13