A-CDM AT HONG KONG INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT (HKIA)

Similar documents
CANSO view on A-CDM. Case study on A-CDM at HKIA. Change management & human factors

Airport Collaborative Decision Making (A-CDM) Operations Guidelines Version Date: 2017/07/21

The Third ATS Coordination Meeting of Bay of Bengal, Arabian Sea and Indian Ocean (BOBASIO) Region Hyderabad, India, 22 nd to 24 th October 2013.

A-CDM from the Flight Crew Perspective. Francisco Hoyas

Changi Airport A-CDM Handbook

Intentionally left blank

DELHI AIRPORT COLLABORATIVE DECISION MAKING (DA-CDM) INDIRA GANDHI INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT NEW DELHI

Implementation, goals and operational experiences of A-CDM system

REPUBLIC OF SINGAPORE AERONAUTICAL INFORMATION SERVICES CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY OF SINGAPORE SINGAPORE CHANGI AIRPORT P.O. BOX 1, SINGAPORE

AIRPORT COLLABORATIVE DECISION MAKING

FRA CDM. Airport Collaborative Decision Making (A-CDM) Flight Crew Briefing FRANKFURT AIRPORT. German Harmonisation

INTRODUCTION OF AIRPORT COLLABORATIVE DECISION MAKING (A-CDM) AT SINGAPORE CHANGI AIRPORT

Target Off-Block Time (TOBT)

Airport Collaborative Decision Making. Dublin A-CDM Operational Procedures

Leveraging on ATFM and A-CDM to optimise Changi Airport operations. Gan Heng General Manager, Airport Operations Changi Airport Group

Seen through an IATA lens A-CDM Globally

Acronyms. Definition. Explanation. All coloured Acronym rows are time parameters which have a standard length of four characters.

AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA S AIRPORT COLLABORATIVE DECISION MAKING SYSTEM. (Presented by Airports Authority of India) SUMMARY

Guide for. A-CDM in CPH

A-CDM FOR REGIONAL AIRPORTS CONCEPT VALIDATION DOCUMENTO PÚBLICO

2nd forum. Airport FRA. procedure

Ultra s Experience with A-CDM

International Civil Aviation Organization

Key Performance Indicators 2017

Key Performance Indicators 2016

Key Performance Indicators 2015

Airspace Organization and Management

Integration of the Airport and the Network DPI/FUM Messages Management Overview

FAA Surface CDM. Collaborative Decision Making and Airport Operations. Date: September 25-27, 2017

Air Traffic Flow & Capacity Management Frederic Cuq

Can elements of the A-CDM milestone approach be automated? Bob Graham Head of Airport Research for Alan Marsden TAM Manager

D02 - Phase 1 - System Requirements Specification

Multi Nodal Regional ATFM/CDM Concept and Operational Trials Colombo 7 May 2014

CENTRAL AIR TRAFFIC FLOW MANAGEMENT ( C-ATFM ) INDIA CATFM. ATFM Global Symposium /22/2017 ATFM Global Symposium 2017

AERONAUTICAL INFORMATION CIRCULAR 1/19

Aviation ICT Forum OCT 2014

Global 8 ATFM Conference 4 6 November 2014 Cancun, Mexico

AIR TRAFFIC FLOW MANAGEMENT INDIA S PERSPECTIVE. Vineet Gulati GM(ATM-IPG), AAI

GENERAL 1. What is Airport CDM? 2. What is the aim of A-CDM? 3. Why has A-CDM been implemented at Amsterdam Airport Schiphol?

Airport Collaborative Decision Making

AIRPORT COLLABORATIVE DECISION MAKING (A-CDM): IATA RECOMMENDATIONS

Nikolaos Papagiannopoulos. Juan Francisco García Lopez

SAFETY ASSESSMENT OF AIRPORT COLLABORATIVE DECISION MAKING (A-CDM)

South African ATFM & A-CDM - Progress and Integration Status. Mikateko Chabani

CATFM CENTRAL AIR TRAFFIC FLOW MANAGEMENT ( C-ATFM ) INDIA. ATFM TF 1 Meeting September 2018

ATFM IMPLEMENATION IN INDIA PROGRESS THROUGH COLLABORATION PRESENTED BY- AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA

Asia/Pacific Region A-CDM Planning

FRA CDM. Airport Collaborative Decision Making (A-CDM) BRIEF DESCRIPTION Frankfurt Airport Version 4.0. German Harmonisation

The SESAR Airport Concept

LINKING EXISTING ON GROUND, ARRIVAL AND DEPARTURE OPERATIONS. Abstract Description of LEONARDO System, a CDM integrated System

OPTIMAL PUSHBACK TIME WITH EXISTING UNCERTAINTIES AT BUSY AIRPORT

EUROPEAN ORGANISATION FOR THE SAFETY OF AIR NAVIGATION EUROCONTROL EUROCONTROL EXPERIMENTAL CENTRE. Collaborative Decision Making at LISBON Airport

Safety Assessment of Airport Collaborative Decision Making (A- CDM)

SESAR Solutions. Display Options

A-CDM Implementation: Burden or Blessing for ANSPs?

Distributed Multi-Nodal ATFM Project Overview & Progress. ICAO MID ATFM/TF/1 & ICAO World Cup 2022 TF/ Sep 2018

Basic DMAN Operational Service and Environment Definition (OSED)

Annual Report 2017 KPI

IATA Fuel Efficiency Program

SIAMOS Put your airport ahead through innovation. Siemens AG All rights reserved.

Introduction of New CANSO Member Simon Li Director General CAD Hong Cong

Airport Collaborative Decision Making Michael Hoehenberger, (Munich Airport) on behalf of ACI World

AOP-NOP Integration. Airports CDM Information Exchange Dr. Alexandra von Eckartsberg

Total Airport Management Solution DELIVERING THE NEXT GENERATION AIRPORT

DMAN-SMAN-AMAN Optimisation at Milano Linate Airport

International Civil Aviation Organization. Twenty-Fourth South East Asia ATM Coordination Group (SAIOACG/7) Bangkok, Thailand, March 2017

Contributions of Advanced Taxi Time Calculation to Airport Operations Efficiency

Inauguration 2017 Dulles Tower

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 255/2010 of 25 March 2010 laying down common rules on air traffic flow management

ICAO ATFM SEMINAR. Dubai, UAE, 14 December 2016

A-CDM A SUCCESS CASE OF COLLABORATION GRUAIRPORT & GOL. Capt Miguel Dau - COO

Airport-CDM Workshop. Stephane Durand Co-chair CANSO CDM sub-group International Affairs DSNA

COLLISION AVOIDANCE FOR RPAS

Thailand ATFM Operations at Sub- Regional Level

Civil and military integration in the same workspace

Workshop. SESAR 2020 Concept. A Brief View of the Business Trajectory

Home LIST OF ACRONYMS

ADB Actual Deicing Begin process status. ADE Actual Deicing End process status

Colombian PBN implementation: El Dorado case study

November 22, 2017 ATFM Systems: The Backbone

Cooperative traffic management

RECOMMENDED GUIDANCE FOR FPL AND RELATED ATS MESSAGES

Future Network Manager Methods

Airport Characterization for the Adaptation of Surface Congestion Management Approaches*

Efficiency and Automation

MANAGING THE CHANGES AS A STATE CASE STUDY UAE Airspace Restructuring Project

Initial Airport Operations Plan Introduction Luc Laveyne SDM airport liaison and managing. 8 September Hosted by SDAG.

ASSEMBLY 39TH SESSION

Agent-Oriented Modelling Prof Kuldar Taveter, Tallinn University of Technology, Estonia

Workshop on the Performance Enhancement of the ANS through the ICAO ASBU framework. Dakar, Senegal, September 2017 presented by Emeric Osmont

ORGANISER HOST LEAD SPONSOR

MULTI-NODAL ATFM COMMON OPERATING PROCEDURES (COP)

AEROTHAI Air Traffic Management Network Management Centre IATA ICAO Cross Border ATFM Workshop

ATFM/CDM ICAO s Perspective

Singapore s Journey to Implement ASBU B-0 & B-1 Modules in PIA-2

Seychelles Civil Aviation Authority. Telecomm & Information Services Unit

A FOCUS ON TACTICAL ATFM. ICAO ATFM Workshop Beijing, 29 th -30 th October 2014

ECOsystem: MET-ATM integration to improve Aviation efficiency

Airspace User Forum 2012

Performance Evaluation of Individual Aircraft Based Advisory Concept for Surface Management

Transcription:

A-CDM AT HONG KONG INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT (HKIA) This document and the information contained herein is the property of Saab AB and must not be used, disclosed or altered without Saab AB prior written consent.

PRESENTATION TOPICS Introduction to A-CDM at HKIA From Procedures Information Systems A-CDM Portal tailored to each user group Training and Trails Measure your way to success Recommendations in short

3 INTRODUCTION TO HKIA & THE A-CDM PROJECT Objectives: Increase information sharing, predictability, capacity, and utilization of resources Lowering fuel consumption and costs Scope: Implement A-CDM procedures and supporting system to facilitate all stakeholder at the airport Stakeholders: Airport Authority of Hong Kong Civil Aviation Department All airlines & ground handling agents The solution provider Time plan: Start Q1 2016 Implementation with trials Q3 2017 New RWY

SCOPE THE HKIA A-CDM IMPLEMENTATION Information Sharing Milestone Approach Variable Taxi Time (VTT) i ARR En-route Approach 1 2 3 i i LINKED i i i DEP Departure 2 8 10 12 14 1 3 4 5 6 7 9 11 13 15 16 INBOUND TURN AROUND OUTBOUND En-route i i i i i i i i Approach Departure En-route Approach Estimated In Block Time VTT Estimated Take Off Time VTT Departure Taxi-in Gate Taxi-out Taxi-in Gate Taxi-out Taxi-in Gate Taxi-out Pre-Departure Sequence En-route Approach 4 TTOT TTOT TSAT TSAT TSAT Departure CDM in Adverse Conditions A-CDM creates predictability and common awareness during e.g. typhoons, thunderstorms En-route Approach Departure Integration with Flow Management 5 6 En-route Approach DEP information updates TSAT Target Take Off Taxi times Flow Restrictions, e.g. CTOT Departure Taxi-in Gate Taxi-out Taxi-in Gate Taxi-out Taxi-in Gate Taxi-out

CHALLENGE #1 CHANGE IN PROCEDURES STD TOBT ETD TSAT EOBT TTOT Predicable & reliable: TOBT TSAT TTOT STD ETD EOBT STD ETD EOBT TOBT TSAT TTOT TOBT STD TSAT ETD TTOT EOBT TOBT STD TSAT ETD TTOT EOBT TOBT TSAT TTOT Move away from the FIRST COME FIRST SERVED to BEST PLANNED BEST SERVED = Adherence to TOBT and TSAT Integration with ATFM = Better airport information for better capacity balancing

6 CHALLENGE #2 - BALANCED APPROACH TO A-CDM Metholodogy Common Vocabulary Objectives & Performance A-CDM Procedures System solution Information Integration

PART OF THE SOLUTION ORGANISATION AND LEADERSHIP COMPANY RESTRICTED 7 HKIA Airport Authority Airfield Ops. Ground Handlers Airline Operators ANSP - CAD AA Airfield Operations Cathay Pacific Cathay Dragon Hong Kong Airlines Hong Kong Express HAGSL HAS Jardine SATS All others

PART OF THE SOLUTION - AGILE METHODOLOGY Workshops to Engage & Collaborate Educate Workshop #1 What is A-CDM Workshop #2 Initial Procedures & Solution Support Workshop #3 Operational Guidelines & User Tools Workshop #4 Final adjustments & implementation Training Tailored training sessions Management Operators ANSP Airport Ground Handlers Organization A-CDM Benefits Roles & Responsibilities Build A-CDM knowledge ConOps Development Initial solution requirements Mature ConOps A-CDM Key Performance Indicators Demo end user solution Final ConOps Demo mature end user solutions Implementation of A-CDM Techincal training Operator training

PRESENTATION TOPICS Introduction to A-CDM at HKIA From Procedures Information Systems A-CDM Portal tailored to each user group Training and Trails Measure your way to success Recommendations in short

10 PROCEDURES THE DEVIL IS IN THE DETAILS GLOBAL GUIDANCE DOCUMENTS COMMON vocabulary & definitions WHAT data shall be shared WHO provides the data A-CDM LOCAL RULES & PROCEDURES HOW do we prioritize different data HOW shall data be updated & BY WHOM HOW shall data be displayed & TO WHOM HOW shall performance be measured SUPPORTING SYSTEMS

11 PROCEDURES INFORMATION USER TOOLS Use Cases Common Vocabulary Performance

13 PROCEDURES INFORMATION USER TOOLS EOBT STD ELDT EIBT TOBT TTOT Taxiing Take-off En-route Landing TSAT Taxiing Gate Taxiing Take-off LOCAL RULES & PROCEDURES ARR. FLIGHT DATA EXIT (Est. Taxi In Time) Turn Around Time EXOT (Est. Taxi Out Time) GATE DATA DEP. FLIGHT DATA FIR Entry ATCC/FDPS ARR & DEP Sch. & Flight Plan Stand planning Final Approach AODB AMAN Actual Landing Actual In block A-SMGCS & Ground Surveillance Ground Movement Data A-SMGCS & Ground Surveillance 1 2 ARDT (Actual Ready Time) Electronic Flight ASAT Strips (Actual Start-up Approval Time) AOBT (Actual Off Block Time) ATOT A-SMGCS (Actual& Take Ground Off Time) Surveillance CTOT (Calculated Take Off Time) ATFM 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 10 14 12 15 16

PROCEDURES INFORMATION USER TOOLS Utilizes surveillance data from A- SMGCS and/or MLAT. The end user benefits from this by: Better Predictions Better Variable Taxi Times adapting dynamically Drives capture of ALDT, AIBT, AOBT, ATOT Higher accuracy in compliance times Better reporting capabilities Higher degree of automation Positions Entry times Exit times Dwell time

15 PROCEDURES INFORMATION USER TOOLS Taxiing Take-off En-route Landing Taxiing Gate Taxiing Airport RAMP AOC Crew GH ANSP A-CDM Performance A-CDM LOCAL Milestone RULES A-CDM & PROCEDURES TOBT Progress Management EXIT (Est. Taxi In Time EIBT (Est. In-Block Time) A-CDM Platform incl DMAN ELDT (Estimated Landing ATCC/FDPS Time) ARR & DEP Sch. & Flight Plan Stand planning ELDT (Estimated Landing Time) AODB AMAN ALDT (Actual Landing Time) AIBT (Actual In-Block Time) A-SMGCS & Ground Surveillance Ground Movement Data A-SMGCS & Ground Surveillance 1 2 TOBT (Target Off Block Time) EXOT (Est. Taxi Out Time) Take-off A-CDM TOBT Management TSAT (Target Start-up Approval Time) TTOT (Target Take Off Time) ARDT (Actual Ready Time) Electronic Flight ASAT Strips (Actual Start-up Approval Time) AOBT (Actual Off Block Time) ATOT A-SMGCS (Actual& Take Ground Off Time) Surveillance CTOT (Calculated Take Off Time) ATFM Departure Manager 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 10 14 12 15 16

PRESENTATION TOPICS Introduction to A-CDM at HKIA From Procedures Information Systems A-CDM Portal tailored to each user group Training and Trails Measure your way to success Recommendations in short

17 PROCEDURES INFORMATION USER TOOLS Airport Authority CAD To monitor the overall A-CDM process and analyze the KPIs defined for the A-CDM implementation TWR/Watch supervisor Set the PDS configuration parameters Monitor the departure flow Clearance Delivery Manage the Ready and TSAT communications with pilot prior to the hand over to the Ground Controller Ground Manage startup and pushback approvals based upon TSAT Airline or Ground Handlers Manage TOBTs To monitor the overall A-CDM process

FLEXIBLE USER INTERFACE Tools for presenting information and collaborating: Lists Counters Timeline Flight Details Milestone presentation Graphs (real time and statistics) Multi purpose Map Display Configuration parameters Web page display Chat tool Integration with ATC Voice and more DESIGN YOUR WORKSPACE

FLEXIBLE USER INTERFACE Tools for presenting information and collaborating: Lists Counters Timeline Flight Details Milestone presentation Graphs (real time and statistics) Multi purpose Map Display Configuration parameters Web page display Chat tool Integration with ATC Voice and more

FLEXIBLE USER INTERFACE Tools for presenting information and collaborating: Lists Counters Timeline Flight Details Milestone presentation Graphs (real time and statistics) Multi purpose Map Display Configuration parameters Web page display Chat tool Integration with ATC Voice and more

PROCEDURES INFORMATION USER TOOLS Airport RAMP AOC Crew GH ANSP A-CDM Performance A-CDM Milestone Progress A-CDM TOBT Management A-CDM TOBT Management Departure Manager A-CDM Platform incl DMAN Taxiing Take-off En-route Landing Taxiing Gate Taxiing Take-off

22 MOBILE APPS Manage TOBT inputs A-CDM Information

PRESENTATION TOPICS Introduction to A-CDM at HKIA From Procedures Information Systems A-CDM Portal tailored to each user group Training and Trails Measure your way to success Recommendations in short

26 TRAINING & TRIALS A-CDM = changes in procedures = impact on the airlines, ground handlers, ANSP, and the airport operator At Hong Kong the approach was: Workshops during the development of the ConOps and system Training for all stakeholders Training sessions for over 500 users Over-the-Shoulder support/training during the roll out

27 TRAINING & TRIALS Trials are a vital part of the A-CDM implementation Getting used to managing TOBTs and TSAT will take time! Phased approach at HKIA Gate Focus on TOBT Gate Focus on TOBT, TSAT and CTOT Full A-CDM Operation Let the trials take the time needed!

PRESENTATION TOPICS Introduction to A-CDM at HKIA From Procedures Information Systems A-CDM Portal tailored to each user group Training and Trails Measure your way to success Recommendations in short

29 MEASURE YOUR WAY TO SUCCESS The result of an A-CDM implementation cannot be evaluated without a framework for measuring Key Performance Indicators HKIA has a collaborative approach to: Establishing STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES that A-CDM shall contribute to Establishing related KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Disseminating and evaluating results and assess how to improve!

PRESENTATION TOPICS Introduction to A-CDM at HKIA From Procedures Information Systems A-CDM Portal tailored to each user group Training and Trails Measure your way to success Recommendations in short

ROAD TO SUCCESS Work collectively with all stakeholder from the start Define the operational concept through collaboration and how they impact the overall airport system as well as the stakeholders. Do benchmarking of as-is and define clear objectives of what shall be achieved collectively and by each participant Allow for agile development of tools that involves the users Training, training, training!!! Do trials during implementation and validate the results! Monitor & Improve Identify potential improvements Train & Implement Procedures & Tools Engage Involve and educate partners to get them on board A-CDM Success Develop & Adapt Procedures & Tools Plan Agree on objectives, obligations, and schedule A-CDM success is an on-going process

THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION! This document and the information contained herein is the property of Saab AB and must not be used, disclosed or altered without Saab AB prior written consent.

NOT CLASSIFIED OPERATIONS GUIDELINES - USE CASES To better understand the Operations Guidelines we will discuss the following use cases: NORMAL CASE DELAY CASE due to other reasons In the scenario we use a passenger delay as the example but this can be applied to any delay reason like mechanical etc. FLOW CONTROL (CTOT ALLOCATION) Alternative 1 - No adjustment of TOBT Alternative 2 - Adjusting TOBT to delay turn around procedures e.g., boarding

NOT CLASSIFIED 34 TOBT AND TSAT EXAMPLE (NORMAL CASE) 1-b) POBT & PSAT available TSAT available via the A-CDM portal TOBT available via the A-CDM portal PSAT TSAT POBT TOBT EOBT 17:00 19:20 19:35 19:55 20:00 20:05 1-a) AO file flight plan to ATC, EOBT set 2-a) AO/GH confirmation of TOBT 3-a) ATC TSAT Issued 1-a) AO: Flight plan file at/before SOBT(STD) -180 1-b) A-CDM Platform/Aerobahn: POBT and PSAT AVAILABLE from EOBT -180 2-a) AO/GH: TOBT CONFIRMATION at EOBT -40 3-a) ATC: TSAT ISSUED at TOBT -25 4. Start-up Procedures (Call Ready) 5. Start-up Procedures (Start-up and Pushback) Window to call ready TOBT +/- 5 Start-up window ARDT +5 4-a) 20:00 Pilot calls CDC ready 4-b) 20:01 CDC marks ARDT and hands over to GC 5-a) 20:03 Pilot requests start-up and push back approval from GC 5-b) 20:05 GC start-up approval (ASAT) and push back approval

NOT CLASSIFIED OPERATIONS GUIDELINES - USE CASES To better understand the Operations Guidelines we will discuss the following use cases: NORMAL CASE DELAY CASE due to other reasons In the scenario we use a passenger delay as the example but this can be applied to any delay reason like mechanical etc. REGULATED FLIGHT (CTOT ALLOCATION) Alternative 1 - No adjustment of TOBT Alternative 2 - Adjusting TOBT to delay turn around procedures e.g., boarding

NOT CLASSIFIED 36 AD-HOC DELAY (IN THIS SCENARIO, DUE TO MISSING PASSENGER) 1-b) POBT & PSAT available TSAT available via the A-CDM portal TOBT available via the A-CDM portal PSAT TSAT POBT TOBT EOBT 4-c) Updated TSAT 4-b) Update TOBT with reason 17:00 19:20 19:35 19:50 20:00 20:05 20:10 20:15 1-a) AO file flight plan to ATC, EOBT set 2-a) AO/GH confirmation of TOBT 3-a) ATC TSAT Issued 1-a) AO: Flight plan file at/before SOBT(STD) 180 1-b) A-CDM Platform/Aerobahn: POBT and PSAT AVAILABLE from EOBT -180 2-a) AO/GH: TOBT CONFIRMATION at EOBT -40 3-a) ATC: TSAT ISSUED at TOBT -25 4-a) Delay due to missing passenger at 19:50 4-b) AO/GH decides to delay flight and updates TOBT to 20:10 (incl reason for delay) 4-c) A-CDM Platform/Aerobahn: New TSAT is generate at the earliest slot, here at 20:10 5. Start-up Procedures (Call Ready) 6. Start-up Procedures (Start-up and Pushback) 4-a) Delay due to missing passenger causing unloading of baggage Call ready TOBT +/- 5 5-a) 20:05 Pilot calls CDC ready 5-b) ) 20:07 CDC marks ARDT and hands over to GC 6-a) 20:08 Pilot requests start-up and push back approval from GC 6-b) 20:11 GC start-up approval (ASAT) and push back approval

NOT CLASSIFIED OPERATIONS GUIDELINES - USE CASES To better understand the Operations Guidelines we will discuss the following use cases: NORMAL CASE DELAY CASE due to other reasons In the scenario we use a passenger delay as the example but this can be applied to any delay reason like mechanical etc. FLOW CONTROL (CTOT ALLOCATION) Alternative 1 - No adjustment of TOBT Alternative 2 - Adjusting TOBT to delay turn around procedures e.g., boarding

NOT CLASSIFIED 38 FLOW CONTROL (CTOT ALLOCATION) ALTERNATIVE 1 1-b) POBT & PSAT available TSAT available at EOBT -25 2-a) CTOT issued at around -120 TOBT available EOBT -40 2-b) New PSAT 17:00 18:00 19:20 19:35 19:55 PSAT POBT TOBT EOBT 20:00 20:05 4. TSAT PSAT 21:15 21:20 21:25 2-a) CTOT CTOT 21:40 1-a) AO file flight plan to ATC, EOBT set 3-a) AO/GH confirmation of TOBT 4-a) ATC TSAT Issued 1-a) AO: Flight plan file at/before SOBT(STD) 180 1-b) A-CDM Platform/Aerobahn: POBT and PSAT AVAILABLE from EOBT -180 2-a) ATC: CTOT ISSUED at around EOBT -120 2-b) A-CDM Platform/Aerobahn: New PSAT that is PSAT = [CTOT EXOT 5 ] (@21:20) 3-a) AO/GH: TOBT CONFIRMATION at EOBT -40 4-a) ATC: TSAT ISSUED at TOBT -25 5. Start-up Procedures (Call Ready) 6. Start-up Procedures (Start-up and Pushback) Window to call ready TOBT +/- 5 5-a) 19:58 Pilot calls CDC ready 5-b) CDC marks ARDT and instructs pilot to call back at TSAT time. Call at TSAT +/- 5 6-a) 21:17 Pilot calls CDC who hands over to GC 6-b) 21:20 Pilot requests start-up and push back approval from GC 6-c) 21:20 GC start-up approval (ASAT) and push back approval

NOT CLASSIFIED 39 FLOW CONTROL (CTOT ALLOCATION) ALTERNATIVE 2 17:00 2-a) CTOT issued at around -120 18:00 1-b) POBT & PSAT available 19:15 TOBT available PSAT POBT EOBT 20:00 20:55 TSAT at TOBT -25 21:15 2-b) New PSAT PSAT TSAT TOBT 3-a) New TOBT 21:20 21:25 CTOT 21:40 2-a) CTOT 1-a) AO file flight plan to ATC, EOBT set 3-a) AO/GH decision to delay TOBT 4-a) ATC TSAT Issued call ready TOBT +/- 5 1-a) AO: Flight plan file at/before SOBT(STD) 180 1-b) A-CDM Platform/Aerobahn: POBT and PSAT AVAILABLE from EOBT -180 2-a) ATC: CTOT ISSUED at around EOBT -120 2-b) A-CDM Platform/Aerobahn: New PSAT that is PSAT = [CTOT EXOT 5 ] (@21:20) 3-a) AO/GH: Decision to delay by inputting TOBT at 19:15. The POBT is deleted 4-a) ATC: TSAT ISSUED at TOBT -25 5. Start-up Procedures (Call Ready) 6. Start-up Procedures (Start-up and Pushback) 5-a) 21:15 Pilot calls CDC ready 5-b) 21:16 CDC marks ARDT and hands over to GC 6-a) 21:18 Pilot requests start-up and push back approval from GC 6-b) 21:20 GC start-up approval (ASAT) and push back approval