Kelly Motorized Trails Project Proposed Action

Similar documents
Mt. Hood National Forest

National Forests and Grasslands in Texas

PROPOSED ACTION South 3000 East Salt Lake City, UT United States Department of Agriculture

Proposed Action Kaibab Campground Capital Improvement Project September 2008

ROAD AND TRAIL PROJECT APPROVAL

RIM TRAIL EXTENSION PROJECT

Proposed Action. Payette National Forest Over-Snow Grooming in Valley, Adams and Idaho Counties. United States Department of Agriculture

Thank you for this third opportunity to comment on the proposed revisions to the Coconino National Forest Management plan.

DECISION MEMO. Rawhide Trail #7073 Maintenance and Reconstruction

Daisy Dean Trail 628/619 ATV Trail Construction

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed action to add trails and trailheads to the Red Rock District trail system.

Logo Department Name Agency Organization Organization Address Information 5700 North Sabino Canyon Road

PURPOSE AND NEED. Introduction

Response to Public Comments

Tahoe National Forest Over-Snow Vehicle Use Designation

Coronado National Forest Santa Catalina Ranger District

Decision Memo for Desolation Trail: Mill D to Desolation Lake Trail Relocation

Continental Divide National Scenic Trail Legislative History and Planning Guidance

Sawtooth National Forest Fairfield Ranger District

Emily to Blind Lake Trail PROPOSED TRAIL DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY

The Chu property is a 6.57 acre parcel located in the Town of Superior on the west side of McCaslin Boulevard. In 2014, the Town of Superior acquired

Rule Governing the Designation and Establishment of All-Terrain Vehicle Use Trails on State Land

Table of Contents. page 3 Long term Goals Project Scope Project History. 4 User Groups Defined Trail Representative Committee. 5 Trail Users Breakdown

Buford / New Castle Motorized Trail

Bradley Brook Relocation Project. Scoping Notice. Saco Ranger District. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service

DECISION NOTICE. Sled Springs OHV Trail System and Road Management Plan

Creating a User-Driven Long-Distance OHV Trail Through Partnering

Buffalo Pass Trails Project

White Mountain National Forest Saco Ranger District

Beaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest Butte Ranger District

Proposal to Redevelop Lower Kananaskis River-Barrier Lake. Bow Valley Provincial Park. Frequently Asked Questions

Decision Memo Broken Wheel Ranch Equestrian Outfitter Special-Use Permit Proposed Action

2016 Regional Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) Grant Application

March 14, SUBJECT: Public input to the Bureau of Land Management, Gunnison Field Office, Travel Management Plan

Preferred Recreation Recommendations Stemilt-Squilchuck Recreation Plan March 2018

White Mountain National Forest Saco Ranger District

Dumont Dunes Special Recreation Management Area (SRMA)

Trails Technical Committee

Decision Memo Sun Valley Super Enduro & Cross-Country Mountain Bike Race. Recreation Event

Hermosa Area Preservation The Colorado Trail Foundation 4/11/2008

Land Management Summary

Fossil Creek Wild & Scenic River Comprehensive River Management Plan Forest Service Proposed Action - details March 28, 2011

Appendix A Appendix A (Project Specifications) Auk Auk / Black Diamond (Trail 44) Reroute

USDA United States ~ Department of A riculture

Cave Run Nonmotorized Trails Project

Coconino National Forest Potential Wilderness Proposal

Recreation Effects Report Travel Management

To: Cam Hooley From: Trails 2000 Date: September 30, 2016 Re: Hermosa Comments. Dear Cam:

Connie Rudd Superintendent, Black Canyon of the Gunnison National Park

Francis Marion and Sumter National Forests

Lakes Landscape Travel Management

Cave Run Non-Motorized Trails Initiative Scoping Document

Final Recreation Report. Sunflower Allotment Grazing Analysis. July 2015

Section II. Planning & Public Process Planning for the Baker/Carver Regional Trail began in 2010 as a City of Minnetrista initiative.

Crook County Oregon. Natural Resources Planning Committee Draft Report

Memo. Board of County Commissioners. FROM: Tamra Allen, Planner. Buford/New Castle Motorized Trail. Date: February 13, 2012

White Mountain National Forest. Pond of Safety Accessible Trail & Shoreline Access Project. Scoping Report. Township of Randolph Coos County, NH

Proposal to Redevelop Lower Kananaskis River-Barrier Lake. Bow Valley Provincial Park

5.0 OUTDOOR RECREATION OPPORTUNITIES AND MANAGEMENT

Dungeness Recreation Area County Park Master Plan

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Mount Elden/Dry Lake Hills Recreation Planning Proposed Action, (MEDL).

Description of the Proposed Action for the Big Creek / Yellow Pine Travel Plan (Snow-free Season) and Big Creek Ford Project

PROPOSED PARK ALTERNATIVES

Williamson Rock/Pacific Crest National Scenic Trail (PCT) Project EIS. Notice of intent to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement.

Digital Terrain Analysis of Archer Mountain

Chatsworth Branch Library Devonshire Street, Chatsworth, CA Thursday, November 16, :00-8:00 pm

Bear Creek Habitat Improvement Project

FINAL TESTIMONY 1 COMMITTEE ON RESOURCES UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES. July 13, 2005 CONCERNING. Motorized Recreational Use of Federal Lands

White Mountain National Forest

RUSHMORE CONNECTOR TRAIL PROPOSAL

Stevenson Ranch Library The Old Road, Stevenson Ranch, CA Thursday, November 9, :00-8:00 pm

Tracy Ridge Shared Use Trails and Plan Amendment Project

Decision Memo Ice Age Trail Improvement (CRAC 37)

The Roots of Carrying Capacity

NATIONAL PARK SERVICE CERTIFICATION OF COMPLETED SEGMENTS OF THE NORTH COUNTRY NATIONAL SCENIC TRAIL

RECREATION. Seven issues were identified that pertain to the effects of travel management on outdoor recreation within portions of the project area.

BACKGROUND DECISION. Decision Memo Page 1 of 6

MARBLE RIVER PROVINCIAL PARK

Applying Carrying Capacity Concepts in Wilderness

S Central Coast Heritage Protection Act APRIL 21, 2016

Welcome to the future of Terwillegar Park a Unique Natural Park

BACKCOUNTRY TRAIL FLOOD REHABILITATION PROGRAM

CHAPTER III: TRAIL DESIGN STANDARDS, SPECIFICATIONS & PERMITS

Hiawatha National Forest St. Ignace Ranger District. File Code: 1950 Date: August 5, 2011

APPENDIX I STANDARD CONSULTATION PROTOCOL FOR TRAVEL MANAGEMENT ROUTE DESIGNATION

General Implementation

Environmental Assessment

Appendix 3. Greenway Design Standards. The Whitemarsh Township Greenway Plan

Teton Basin Ranger District

Environmental Assessment for Zuni Mountain Trails

Astoria District Recreation Management Plan

RECREATION ACCESS AND COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT PLAN

Wilderness Process #NP-1810: Your letter ID is NP September 5, 2018

September 14, Comments of the Colorado Trail Foundation On the USFS Scoping Notice of August 13, 2010 RE: the relocation of the CDNST/CT Page 1

Superintendent David Uberuaga June 27, 2011 Grand Canyon National Park P.O. Box 129 Grand Canyon, AZ 86023

White Mountain National Forest

Safety, Infrastructure, and Tenant Improvement Project. Public Hearing Informational Brochure February 26, 2013

Chapter 4.0 Alternatives Analysis

Whitefish Range Partnership Tentatively Approved by WRP 11/18/2013!Rec. Wilderness Page 1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT REPORT PURPOSE EXISTING SETTING EXPANDING PARKLAND

Transcription:

Kelly Motorized Trails Project Proposed Action November 28, 2011 The Flagstaff Ranger District of the Coconino National Forest is seeking public input on the proposed Kelly Motorized Trails Project (formerly known as the Airport Motorized Trail Project). The goal of this project is to provide motorized recreation opportunities for both single-track (motorcycles) and larger motorized trail users (ATV/UTVs). The project area is generally defined on the north by the southern boundary of Flagstaff Airport, Forest Road 240 on the south, Interstate 17 on the west, and Forest Road 132 on the east (see Figure 1). The anticipated National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) analysis document is an Environmental Assessment (EA). EXISTING CONDITION Currently, there are a limited number of Forest Service trails available for motorized use to accommodate the growing interest in this type of recreation, including a lack of opportunities for creating trail loops and/or a longer trail riding experience. This shortage, in conjunction with the population growth of Flagstaff and surrounding areas, has resulted in impacts to National Forest resources from unplanned, or non-system, motorized trail creation and use. In addition, the Travel Management Rule (TMR) decision (September 2011) restricts cross-country motorized vehicle travel and reduces approximately 4,387 miles of road across the Forest, thus further concentrating motorized use on to the designated motorized trail system (discussed below): Trails Open to All Motorized Vehicles (Motorized Trails) Trails open to all vehicles (including both highway-legal and non-legal vehicles) total 8.5 miles. This includes the 6.7 miles Casner Mountain Trail and the 1.8 miles Lower Smasher Canyon Trail. Note: due to the narrow nature of the Casner Mountain Trail and its location under a power line, Forest visitors wishing to use this trail with full-size four-wheel drive vehicles must first contact the Red Rock District Office to obtain a permit and the gate combination (see the Coconino National Forest website for more information http://www.fs.usda.gov/recarea/coconino/recreation/ohv/recarea/?recid=55262&actid=94). There are no seasonal designations for any of these routes. The 13,711 acre Cinder Hills Off-Highway Vehicle area is also designated for off-road driving and is managed for two and four wheeled vehicles. This is not a new designation or area through TMR. Trails Open to Single Track Only (Single Track) Motorcycle-only trails total 20.5 miles, which includes the existing Fort Valley Motorized Trail System. These trails are for single-track (two-wheeled) motorcycle use. There are no seasonal designations for any of these routes. Trails Open to Vehicles 50 Inches or Less in Width Trails open to vehicles 50 inches or less in width total 9.3 miles. These trails include the existing Munds Park Motorized Trail System. This designation of 50 inches or less was used based on existing gate widths, which would prevent passage from larger OHVs. There are no seasonal designations for any of these routes.

DESIRED CONDITION The goal of this project is to create a resilient motorized trail system by using a combination of open Level 2 roads, converting roads that are identified to be closed through the TMR decision into trails, adopting segments of user-created routes, and constructing some new trail. Two trailheads would provide access and parking, and would also serve to communicate Forest-relevant information, such as safety messages. The proposed motorized trail system would be approximately 73 miles to allow for a full-day of motorized recreation with loops that do not require street-legal vehicles, and which would accommodate riders of all skill levels. Single track trails would be more concentrated in the northern portion, where some user created single track routes are located, and the larger motorized trails would be more in the southern portion for the same reason. NEED FOR CHANGE There is a need to create a resilient, diverse motorized trail system to safely and effectively accommodate the growing demand for off-highway vehicle travel. In addition, there is a need to construct two trailheads with parking areas and informational signage to support the motorized trail system. By creating such a system, the Forest would better protect valuable resources, including sensitive soils, archaeology sites and wildlife habitat, while meeting the Forest Service objective of a multiple-use forest. The Forest began working with local motorized user groups in 2009 to identify an appropriate location; the Kelly project area was chosen based on the low-density of sensitive Forest resources, number of existing user-created trails, durability of features, and distance from private land. PROPOSED ACTION The proposed Kelly Motorized Trail system would be approximately 73 miles, and would provide multiple loop options for both single-track (motorcycles) and larger motorized off-highway vehicles (ATV/UTVs) (see Figure 2). Though designed for motorized use, the trail system would be open to other recreational uses, including hiking and mountain biking. Appropriate signage at trailheads and trail layout would reduce user conflict and safety issues. The following table depicts the anticipated system with a breakdown of each proposed trail construction method. Trail Design Miles Single Track 37 Road-to-Trail Conversion 6 New Construction 25 Adoption of User-created Trail 6 Motorized Trails 36 Road-to-Trail Conversion 17 Open Roads (level 2 and below) 11 New Construction 8 Total 73 In addition, two trailheads are proposed: one within one mile of the Kelly Canyon interchange on Interstate 17 (near Forest Road 700), and another within one mile of Forest Highway 3 (Lake Mary Road)

off of Forest Road 867, near Fay Canyon (see Figure 2). Trailheads would be approximately 30,000 square feet each and would retain a roaded natural setting as defined by the Coconino Forest Management Plan for Recreation Opportunity Spectrum classes. The trailheads may include vault toilets, informational kiosks, parking barriers, and a hardened surface. Natural and natural-appearing materials would be used in the design of facilities to compliment the character of their landscape settings. Existing user-created routes that do not result in resource damage were incorporated into the proposed designed system when feasible. Remaining social trails within the project area would be rehabilitated using a variety of techniques, including ripping all or portions of the trail, or allowing natural healing to occur by placing obstructions around the trail. All rehabilitation techniques would follow appropriate resource protection measures. Road-to-trail conversion would be accomplished by re-designation in the case of motorized trails, and obliteration/rehabilitation of a road while leaving a trail tread using a portion of the old roadbed for single track trails. The proposed motorized trail system was developed to best avoid sensitive archaeological, wildlife and plant resources, as well as private developed land. Habitat for the threatened Mexican spotted owl is present; however trails were designed to avoid impacts to the species. Cattle guards are proposed for those areas where the trails cross range allotment fencing to accommodate the infrastructure. This proposed motorized trail system would provide connections to the existing Munds Park motorized trail system; however no improvements to the Munds Park system are proposed through this project. Best management practices (BMPs) for trail construction as identified in the Forest Service Trails Handbook and Specifications for Construction and Maintenance of Trails as well as design features to protect Forest resources would be incorporated into trail design and construction. In addition, preconstruction surveys for Forest Service sensitive plant species, noxious/invasive weeds, and archaeological sites would be conducted prior to trail construction. This will provide for optimum detection and protection of sensitive plant and heritage resources. YOUR INVOLVEMENT We encourage your participation in our scoping process. Both map figures are also available on the Coconino National Forest website under Kelly Motorized Trails Project at http://www.fs.fed.us/nepa/fsusda-pop.php/?project=36911. If you have project specific questions and/or comments regarding this proposed action, please contact Erin Phelps, Writer/Editor, on the Flagstaff Ranger District by regular mail to 5075 N. Highway 89, Flagstaff, AZ 86004; by fax at 928.527.8288; by phone at 928.527.8240; or by email to comments-southwestern-coconino-flagstaff@fs.fed.us. Comments may also be hand delivered to the Flagstaff District Office at the address above between 8:00 am and 4:30 pm, Monday through Friday excluding holidays. Comments received in response to this solicitation, including names and addresses of those who comment, will be considered part of the public record on this project and will be available for public inspection. To be the most helpful in the planning process, please provide your comments by January 4, 2012. Those who respond to this invitation for comments will be notified when the Environmental Assessment (EA) for this project is available for review. In the event you do not choose to comment, but would still like a copy of the EA, please contact Erin Phelps at 928.527.8240 or ephelps@fs.fed.us.

Figure 1: Project Vicinity Map

Figure 2: Proposed Kelly Motorized Trail System