Joint Delta/FAA Demonstration of Supplemental Turbulence Products for Pilots

Similar documents
BEFORE THE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON D.C. Docket FAA PETITION OF DELTA AIR LINES, INC. FOR AN EXEMPTION December 21, 2012

Turbulence Data Sharing Project. Katya Vashchankova Head, IATA Meteorological (MET) Program

Airport Safety Management Systems: Integrating Planning Into the Process

Safety Enhancement SE 226 Cargo Hazardous Material Fires Enhanced Protection of Occupants and Aircraft

New York Aviation Management Association Conference

EASA Safety Information Bulletin. SIB No.: Issued: 09 December 2013

CIVIL AVIATION PUBLICATION CAP 10 CPDLC

Figure 3.1. Foreign Airport Assessment Aid

USE OF RADAR IN THE APPROACH CONTROL SERVICE

OVERVIEW OF THE FAA ADS-B LINK DECISION

Operational Evaluation of a Flight-deck Software Application

Gogo Connected Aircraft Services

Certification Memorandum. Guidance to Certify an Aircraft as PED tolerant

RNP AR APCH Approvals: An Operator s Perspective

Glass Cockpits in General Aviation Aircraft. Consequences for training and simulators. Fred Abbink

Place image here (10 x 3.5 ) FAA NEXTGEN DATA COMM TOWER SERVICE: CPDLC DCL NEW OPERATOR INTRODUCTION HARRIS.COM #HARRISCORP

Weather Information for Pilots

Turbulence Joint Safety Implementation Team. Detailed Implementation Plan For Improve the Quality of Turbulence Information

Saint Petersburg-Clearwater International Airport. Airspace & Instrument Approach Analysis

ADVANCED SURVEILLANCE IN ONE INTEGRATED PACKAGE

Traffic Flow Management

Boeing s goal is gateto-gate. crew awareness that promotes safety and efficiency.

(Presented by the United States)

i4d A MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY PERSPECTIVE GROUND AND AIRBORNE ASPECTS Michel Procoudine Lionel Rouchouse Thales

PASSUR Aerospace Annual Shareholder Meeting, April 5, 2017

The Challenge of Surface Conditions. AST: A New Solution to a Global Aviation Problem. Benefits and Business Value to Airports and Operators

TWELFTH AIR NAVIGATION CONFERENCE

DESIGNATED PILOT EXAMINER. Skill Test Standards. for

SOFIA. Safe AutOmatic Flight Back and LandIng of Aircraft

HEMS Tool Project History, Status and Future

Surveillance and Broadcast Services

Portable electronic devices

Executive Summary. MASTER PLAN UPDATE Fort Collins-Loveland Municipal Airport

CONNECT Events: Flight Optimization

Workshop. SESAR 2020 Concept. A Brief View of the Business Trajectory

Appendix E NextGen Appendix

July 2008 COMPANY INDOCTRINATION TRAINING 1.0 PURPOSE

OPERATIONS CIRCULAR 01/2012. Subject: HEAD-UP DISPLAYS (HUD) AND ENHANCED VISION SYSTEMS (EVS)

NextGen Trajectory-Based Operations Status Update Environmental Working Group Operations Standing Committee

March 2016 Safety Meeting

Aviation Noise and Emissions Symposium February 27, 2018

CENTRAL TEXAS COLLEGE AIR AGENCY No. DU8S099Q SYLLABUS FOR AIRP 1451 INSTRUMENT GROUND SCHOOL Semester Hours Credit: 4_. Instructor: Office Hours:

MANAGING THE CHANGES AS A STATE CASE STUDY UAE Airspace Restructuring Project

NOISE ABATEMENT PROCEDURES

Katya Vashchankova, Head, IATA MET Program Turbulence Impact Mitigation Workshop, 2018

Appendix B Ultimate Airport Capacity and Delay Simulation Modeling Analysis

The SESAR Airport Concept

U.S. India Aviation Cooperation Program. Air Traffic Management Training Program Update March 2009

A Clear Vision A Conversation With Sean Durfy, Chief Executive Officer, WestJet Airlines, Page 16.

HEAD-UP DISPLAY (HUD), EQUIVALENT DISPLAYS AND VISION SYSTEMS

Weather Information Service

Surveillance and Broadcast Services

CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY, PAKISTAN OPERATIONAL CONTROL SYSTEMS CONTENTS

Advisory Circular. Use of Transmitting and Non-Transmitting Portable Electronic Devices

THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS

3.3 Specific Developments in Air Navigation CNS AUTOMATIC DEPENDENT SURVEILLANCE BROADCAST (ADS-B) (Presented by the United States of America) SUMMARY

ORGANISER HOST LEAD SPONSOR

TWELFTH AIR NAVIGATION CONFERENCE

POST-IMPLEMENTATION COMMUNITY IMPACT REVIEW

Jeppesen Total Navigation Solution

Safety Enhancement SE ASA Design Virtual Day-VMC Displays

The NextGen contribution to the near and mid-term safety. Steve Bradford NextGen Chief Scientist Date: June 12th 2017

FLIGHT PATH FOR THE FUTURE OF MOBILITY

Real-time route planning streamlines onboard operations, reduces fuel burn and delays, and improves on-time performance.

TWELFTH WORKING PAPER. AN-Conf/12-WP/137. International ICAO. developing RNAV 1.1. efficiency. and terminal In line.

Overview of On-Going and Future R&D. 20 January 06 Ray Miraflor, NASA Ames Research Center

EUR/SAM corridor airspace concept

Feasibility Study Federal Inspection Service Facility at Long Beach Airport

Simulator Architecture for Training Needs of Modern Aircraft. Philippe Perey Technology Director & A350 Program Director

Weather Technology in the Cockpit (WTIC) Planning and Status Update

Wake Turbulence Research Modeling

Dave Burr - AFS-260. Steve Gibbs AFS-300

SMS HAZARD ANALYSIS AT A UNIVERSITY FLIGHT SCHOOL

National Transportation Safety Board Recommendation and FAA Air Traffic Orders

Optimization of Airspace and Procedures in the Metroplex

Establishing a Risk-Based Separation Standard for Unmanned Aircraft Self Separation

Advisory Circular. Flight Deck Automation Policy and Manual Flying in Operations and Training

ACI-NA Airport Board Members and Commissioners Annual Conference

Preliminary Results and Findings Limited Deployment Cooperative Airspace Project

Next Generation Airspace Developments: Key Operational Trends and Enablers

Air Navigation Bureau ICAO Headquarters, Montreal

CHAPTER 7 AEROPLANE COMMUNICATION AND NAVIGATION EQUIPMENT

Fly at the speed of ingenuity on your Learjet 85

MetroAir Virtual Airlines

Terms of Reference for a rulemaking task. Portable Electronic Devices (PEDs)

Multi Nodal Regional ATFM/CDM Concept and Operational Trials Colombo 7 May 2014

AIRCRAFT INCIDENT REPORT

Runway Condition Assessment: putting data together for enhanced Safety

RECOMMENDED GUIDANCE FOR FPL AND RELATED ATS MESSAGES

ICAO LOC-I SYMPOSIUM STALL & UPRT IMPLEMENTATION. Itash Samani Global Head of FSTD Regulations, Regulatory Affairs June 2015 Nairobi Kenya

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION National Policy

Atlantic Interoperability Initiative to Reduce Emissions AIRE

(DRAFT) AFI REDUCED VERTICAL SEPARATION MINIMUM (RVSM) RVSM SAFETY POLICY

GRANDE PRAIRIE AIRPORT. Reduced Visibility Operations Plan

TWENTY-SECOND MEETING OF THE ASIA/PACIFIC AIR NAVIGATION PLANNING AND IMPLEMENTATION REGIONAL GROUP (APANPIRG/22)

Applicability / Compatibility of STPA with FAA Regulations & Guidance. First STAMP/STPA Workshop. Federal Aviation Administration

Study and Reference Guide. Flight Instructor Rating

RNAV Departures and STAR Operations Joint Safety Analysis and Implementation Team

QUIETER OPERATIONS A GUIDE FOR PILOTS AND CONTROLLERS

Changi Airport A-CDM Handbook

Transcription:

Joint Delta/FAA Demonstration of Supplemental Turbulence Products for Pilots Delta Air Lines, Inc. requests authorization to demonstrate the feasibility of using a low-cost tablet personal computer (PC) device for the displaying of Graphical Turbulence Guidance (GTG) and Eddy Dissipation Rate (EDR) information in the cockpit for use by the flight crew. Delta Air Lines (DAL), in cooperation with the FAA's Aviation Weather Research Program Turbulence Product Development Team (TPDT), has previously participated in the adaptation, testing, and deployment of the EDR algorithm on DAL aircraft. EDR is aircraft sensor derived and auto-reported at a much greater frequency than Pilot Reports (PIREPs). PIREPs are subjective in nature, and may be geographically inaccurate. Turbulence severity and location reported via PIREPs are often reported in a general, conservative sense, resulting in reallocation of airspace or pilots avoiding large areas of airspace that may not actually be experiencing turbulence conditions. DAL completed installation of the EDR algorithm on its B737NG fleet in September 2008. This new joint effort will be conducted to demonstrate the ability and capability for transmitting GTG and EDR information directly to the flight crews and to identify any benefits resulting from decision making through early turbulence warning. In April 2009, following the initial EDR installation, the FAA funded an effort to assess the safety, efficiency, and capacity benefits of providing improved GTG and EDR information to flight planners / dispatchers. That effort was to determine how EDR data might help in achieving increased airspace capacity through its use by pilots, dispatchers, and Air Traffic Control (ATC) in minimizing deviations in areas of turbulence. Currently, the GTG and EDR information are provided to the dispatchers via a dedicated viewer. The dispatchers utilize the information to coordinate the optimized altitudes and tracks with the pilots and ATC. The result is fewer unnecessary altitude changes and a reduction in workload for both pilots and controllers. The EDR Proof-of-Concept Demonstration effort was completed in January of 2011. Phase I This proposal describes the first phase of Delta s deployment of tablet PC devices to a select group of Line Check Pilots (LCP) for the strict purpose of displaying GTG and EDR information in the cockpit. Upon deployment of the tablet PC s, qualitative operational data will be collected, monitored, and analyzed to determine the effectiveness of this capability. To identify the optimum device for the demonstration, Delta will examine three tablet PC type devices. The onboard aircraft WiFi connection will be used by the tablet PC to access and display the near real-time GTG and EDR information. In preparation for this turbulence uplink demonstration, Delta conducted a Safety Risk Assessment documented below. Prior to the deployment of the tablet PC s to the LCPs, a focused ground demonstration of this capability will be accomplished. Page 1 of 8

Safety Risk Management (SRM) Joint Delta/FAA Demonstration of Supplemental Turbulence Products for Pilots Sequence of Events and Review Sessions Event Description Division Date of Discussion Preliminary Meeting Tom Fahey, Operations Control Center 05/29/2012 (OCC) Meteorology Bill Watts, Delta EDR Uplink Project Manager Chuck Schramek, Safety Management Systems (SMS) and Quality Assurance (QA) Compliance Chris Schwartz, OCC Bunty Ramakrishna, SMS Mark Bradley, Line Operations Risk Assessment ~Same as above ~ 06/07/2012 Action items and report ~Same as above ~ 06/11/2012 Risk Assessment distributed FAA 08/10/2012 I. Purpose Change in Existing Procedure A tablet PC device will be provided to a select group of LCPs as a beta test to access automated turbulence reports (EDR) superimposed on the turbulence forecast (GTG) using the onboard WiFi connection on B737 aircraft during non critical phases of flight. The GTG product is accessed from a National Weather Service (NWS) restricted web site, and the EDR will be accessed using a dedicated Web Feature Service implemented for this demonstration only. II. Current Process Flight crews receive information concerning turbulence for their flight from a combination of the following: i. Delta Meteorology s Upper Air Weather Depiction if time permits and access to a workstation is available prior to the flight ii. Turbulence Plots (TPs) on the flight plan if issued prior to flight plan release. NOTE: A TP is a textual description of the location and severity of known/reported turbulence along the aircraft s route of flight and initially appear on the crews pre-departure flight plan. If an updated TP is issued after departure, the new TP will be sent to the flightcrew via ACARS. iii. TPs issued after departure that are uplinked to cockpit. iv. Discussions over the various ATC sector frequencies as the aircraft proceeds along its flight path. WiFi is not currently permitted to be accessed in any B737 cockpits. Page 2 of 8

Tablet PC s or personal devices to access Turbulence information via WiFi are prohibited in the cockpit by general company policy 1. Currently, certain tablet PC devices are allowed during non-critical phases of flight to access company provided content that is loaded on the device prior to flight. Access to this material does not require any WiFi connectivity. III. Requirements/Criteria Maintain or improve the source of turbulence information with a reduction in cockpit workload using turbulence information accessed through the tablet PC Manage any risks associated with allowing WiFi access on the flight deck specific to Delta s B-737. Note: The B-737 phase 3 display unit has been previously identified as having a potential radio frequency interference issue caused by WiFi usage in proximity to the phase 3 display. This issue is being researched and potential mitigation strategies are being identified. IV. Equipment B737NG with on-aircraft wireless network connectivity capability Tablet PC device V. Background The FAA previously funded the adaptation, testing, and deployment of the EDR algorithm on Delta Air Lines (DAL) aircraft as part of the FAA's Aviation Weather Research Program (AWRP) efforts. While the data is presently available to ground based airline personnel, this effort seeks to validate the ability to provide this same data to an airborne platform. Because DAL B-737NG aircraft are providing EDR data, the team prefers to use the B-737NG as the validation aircraft. As Boeing transitioned to an ungraded display unit (Phase 2 to Phase 3), it was discovered under some conditions that the phase 3 display unit was susceptible to RF interference which caused the display unit to flicker or blank when in close proximity to a WiFi device. In July 2009, several qualification tests with respect to display unit flickering were conducted by Boeing. The qualification tests were conducted to determine the different frequencies, wattage, device type, and distance that would cause flickering of the display units. VI. Initial Concerns: During qualification tests of the Phase 3 Display Unit (DU), some flickering was observed when the max power (4 watts) was introduced. The typical WiFi transmission power in laptops is 32 milliwatts. (See table) Preclude any impact on the National Airspace System. Limit any concerns of workload increase. Manage any risks associated with DU s while using WiFi in the cockpit. 1 Delta Flight Operations Bulletin, Personal Electronic Device Policy, 12-02, May 11, 2012 Page 3 of 8

Boeing Study i. Boeing conducted a study into the Phase 3 DU interference and flickering issue. While the Boeing Study is proprietary in nature, several key findings are enumerated below: 1. No Phase 3 DU flickering or blanking due to RF interference has been reported during normal flight operations in normal operation. 2. Devices intended to be used during this demonstration (based upon the Radiating Power information found in Table 1) must be 4 inches or less from the screen to induce flickering. 3. A single device will not affect all six phase 3 displays at once. 4. Phase 2 DUs have not exhibited any problems during ground tests or normal flight operations. Table 1. RF Risk Assessment / Display Proximity Requirements VII. Delta Study The FAA has been collaborating with DAL and the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) for over 5 years on an improved turbulence forecast product and automated turbulence reporting system that could be a key part of the NextGen weather solution. Delta is conducting a study to assess the benefits of providing forecast (GTG) and real-time turbulence information (EDR) to the cockpit on NextGen-specific areas of focus; operational safety, NAS efficiency, and green-house emissions while reducing the workload of the crew, dispatch and air traffic control. This study is being funded by the FAA. Study i. Approximately, 40 LCPs will participate in a demonstration scenario for a period of 12 months (Effective dates TBD) ii. Information obtained will be specific with targeted questions to be answered by the LCP performing the test. Page 4 of 8

VIII. Potential Risk Flickering or blanking of a phase 3 DU when tablet PC device is positioned 4 inches or closer due to potential RF interference IX. Critical Timeline Issues DAL and the FAA would like to use the DAL B737NG fleet for this demonstration and request approval of the specific fleet type within approximately 3-4 months to allow sufficient time for coordination and logistics. Currently, the Delta B-737NG aircraft are restricted from using WiFi on the flight deck. Delta is seeking FAA approval to provide temporary relief of this restriction during the demonstration effort through an approved mitigation procedure. Note: The mitigation procedure is envisioned to include a minimum separation distance between the phase 3 DU s and the tablet PC device and procedures to prohibit tablet PC device usage during critical phases of flight. X. Post change This is a beta test, hence no proposed change to current procedures to mitigate weather and turbulence will be used by the LCP; whether acting as the pilot flying, pilot monitoring, or while in the jumpseat. The dispatchers will still provide TP s. The intent of the potential future capability is to allow use of tablet PC devices in the cockpit to access real time automated turbulence reports overlaid on a turbulence forecast. The information displayed will be considered supplemental and any concerns or discrepancies will be resolved with the dispatcher as is done today when information provided by ATC and the company provided TP S are inconsistent. XI. Potential Benefits Allowing accessibility to real time information enables flightcrews to make timely decisions in the event of turbulence. The success of the beta test will result in a proven predictive method for pilots to make effective and timely operational decisions for the safety of the passengers and crew. Reduction of ATC chatter and discussions along the Flight Path. Reduction in dispatcher workload. Reduction in the number of unnecessary pilot initiated altitude excursions. Reduction in greenhouse gas emissions as a result of less aircraft operating of their optimal altitude. Reduction in reallocated airspace resulting in unnecessary pilot initiated altitude excursions. XII. Validation DAL conducted, within their B737NG flight simulator, a preliminary analysis of all candidate tablet PC devices for this effort, and no Phase 3 DU issues were observed. Page 5 of 8

Additional validation of the procedure utilizing a tablet PC device will be scheduled for a date to be determined jointly by the FAA and Delta. XIII. Safety Risk Assessment DAL determined, through their internal Safety Management System protocols, that a safety risk assessment was required to ensure appropriate mitigation is accomplished for potential risk identified in Section VIII of this report. XIV. Mitigation Flickering i. The LCP utilizing the tablet PC device will maintain sufficient separation distance 2 between the PC device and the aircraft instruments to avoid a potential blanking or flickering of the DU s. ii. In the event of flickering or blanking, the LCP will power off the device and stow it away from any affected instrumentation. The LCP will then perform any appropriate established procedures per Quick Reference Handbook (QRH). See Reference 737 QRH NNC-10. XV. Data Collection Data provided by the LCP s will be a analyzed by subject matter experts in Delta Flight Operations, subject matter experts within the FAA, and contractor subject matter experts involved in conducting a cost benefit analysis associated with this effort. The intent is to validate the subjective information from the LCP s and to evaluate the effectiveness of the turbulence information and the impact on the operation. Turbulence (meteorology) measures will be collected to ensure effectiveness during the period of the beta test. XVI. Post Collection Measurement The purpose of the demonstration is to validate the supplemental turbulence information provided through the tablet PC device and any potential NextGenrelated benefits (i.e. safety, efficiency, greenhouse emissions). The post collection measurements will examine pilot behavior dealing with turbulence while using the supplemental information on the tablet PC device and will gauge improvements in the areas of: i. Safety through better cabin management ii. Efficiencies (capacity) from less airspace reallocations resulting from unnecessary altitude excursions iii. Greenhouse emissions by reducing the number of unnecessary altitude changes resulting in aircraft operating at less than optimal altitudes. 2 Boeing identified the distance where interference could occur between the device and a Phase 3 Display Unit at approximately 4 inches. Normal use of the tablet PC device during these operational demonstrations will far exceed the separation distance identified by Boeing as being problematic. However, DAL procedures will specify a minimum acceptable separation distance of at least 7 inches between the device and any Phase 3 DU s. Page 6 of 8

Conclusion: Risk Rating is Acceptable 1B, based on the mitigation described in Section XIV. While normal use of the device during the operational demonstrations should far exceed the minimum safe separation distance, the LCP utilizing the tablet PC device will maintain a separation of at least 7 inches between the tablet PC device and any aircraft instruments to avoid potential flickering and blanking of the DUs. In the event of flickering or blanking of a DU, the LCP will turn the tablet PC device OFF, stow the tablet PC device away from any instrumentation and perform the established procedures. Reference 737 QRH NNC-10. Page 7 of 8

Page 8 of 8