Building Level Planning Committee March 30, 2016

Similar documents
Evaluation of Significant Transportation Projects in Northern Virginia Transportation District. HB 599 Ratings Overview NVTA - January 22, 2015

ITS. Intermountain Transportation Solutions Traffic Studies Transportation Analysis Signal Design Site Planning. January 9, 2013

Treasure Island Supplemental Information Report Addendum

A. CONCLUSIONS OF THE FGEIS

7272 WISCONSIN AVENUE LOCAL AREA TRANSPORTATION REVIEW

Traffic Management Plan 2018

Site Location and Setting

5.1 Traffic and Transportation

Interstate 90 and Mercer Island Mobility Study APRIL Commissioned by. Prepared by

US 380 FEASIBILITY STUDY

TransAction Overview. Introduction. Vision. NVTA Jurisdictions

APPENDIX H MILESTONE 2 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS OF THE AT-GRADE CROSSINGS

Lake Erie Commerce Center Traffic Analysis

%g 109 %g 9. %g 99. %g 9. %g 4. %g 4 %g ,95 (/ 1. Route 109 Corridor Study. %g 35. Corridor Study Area Study Area. Sanford.

Community Advisory Panel Meeting #

DOGWOOD AT VILLA AVENUE PROJECT

Memorandum. Roger Millar, Secretary of Transportation. Date: April 5, Interstate 90 Operations and Mercer Island Mobility

FUTURE PASSENGER PROCESSING. ACRP New Concepts for Airport Terminal Landside Facilities

COMMENT PERIOD INTRODUCTION

Technical Advisory Committee. May 14, 2013

Appendix 4.1 J. May 17, 2010 Memorandum from CTPS to the Inter Agency Coordinating Group

Alternative solutions to airport saturation: simulation models applied to congested airports. March 2017

DENISON STREET EXTENSION. Transportation Committee. January 14, Feasibility Study

Existing Conditions Report

Project Advisory Group. May 23, 2013

using other modes) * 0.20 = Number of vehicle in queue Students

Transportation TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Coral Springs Charter High School and Middle School Job No Page 2

Performance Measure Summary

BOSTON REGION METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION

CHAPTER 4: ALTERNATIVES


MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS BETHESDA-CHEVY CHASE MIDDLE SCHOOL #2 SAMAHA ASSOCIATES, PC

Metro ExpressLanes April 5, 2011 Community Meeting re: Adams Blvd Improvements

Memorandum. Fund Allocation Fund Programming Policy/Legislation Plan/Study Capital Project Oversight/Delivery Budget/Finance Contract/Agreement Other:

Parking Amendments - Bay Street, between Harbour Street and Queens Quay West (York Street, Bay Street, and Yonge Street Ramp Removal)

STAR Bond Development

MEMORANDUM. Bob Zagozda, Chief Financial Officer Westside Community Schools. Mark Meisinger, PE, PTOE Felsburg Holt & Ullevig. DATE: June 11, 2018

Depeaking Optimization of Air Traffic Systems

Word Count: 3,565 Number of Tables: 4 Number of Figures: 6 Number of Photographs: 0. Word Limit: 7,500 Tables/Figures Word Count = 2,250

BNA Master Plan Update Community Advisory Committee Meeting No. 5

Proposed Bicycle Lanes on Yonge Street from Queens Quay to Front Street

IL 390 Station. Wood Dale Open House Summary 5/18/17

Public Open House. Chief Peguis Trail Project

Project Evaluation Report

Washington St. & Ash Coulee Dr./43 rd Ave Intersection Study

WATERBORNE TRANSIT. April 21, 2010

KING STREET TRANSIT PILOT

PROGRESS PARK CONNECTOR

Aldridge Transportation Consultants, LLC Advanced Transportation Planning and Traffic Engineering

Score. Category. Access Aesthetics Community Resources

Planning. Proposed Development at the Southeast Corner of Lakeshore Road West and Brookfield Road Intersection FINAL.

Attachment No. 20 RRLRT No. 1. Committee. Busway Grade Crossings STATUS/DATE OF ACTION

Boston Redevelopment Authority 2/26/ Chestnut Hill Avenue Boston/Brookline, MA

HDR itrans Consulting Inc. 100 York Blvd., Suite 300 Richmond Hill, ON L4B 1J8 Tel: (905) Fax: (905)

Caliber Charter School VALLEJO, CA

East Link Project Update. Maintenance of Traffic During Construction. April 21, 2015

Traffic Analysis Final Report

TERMINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN

NJ TRANSIT ANNOUNCES ALTERNATE SERVICE PLAN FOR POSSIBLE RAIL STOPPAGE

HOV LANE PERFORMANCE MONITORING: 2000 REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Watts St westbound thru

Research Report Agreement T4118, Task 24 HOV Action Plan HOV ACTION PLAN

VRE Manassas Park Station Parking Expansion Alternatives Analysis

APPENDIX J TRAFFIC AND PARKING DEMAND STUDIES

USING SCOOT MULTI-NODES TO REDUCE PEDESTRIAN DELAY AT DUAL CROSSINGS IN BRISTOL

Evaluation of Significant Transportation Projects in Northern Virginia Transportation District

THE AIRTRAIN AIRPORT ACCESS SYSTEM JOHN F. KENNEDY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT AIRPORT ACCESS SERVICE

These elements are designed to make service more convenient, connected, and memorable.

LUDWIG RD. SUBDIVISION PROJECT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

PORTS TORONTO Billy Bishop Toronto City Airport Summary of 2015 Traffic and Passenger Surveys

Transportation Demand Management Plan for the Proposed Hampton Inn & Suites in San Mateo, California

Understanding Your I-66 Trip

CHERRIOTS 2018 SERVICE PLAN 1

Assessment of Travel Trends

San Quentin Reuse Planning Committee Minutes Thursday, May 2, 2002 San Rafael Corporate Center

Appendix B Connecting Track Options Evaluation Criteria

Lansdowne Wetton BRT Public Transport Corridor Trunk Route: Planning Analysis

DTAH for the City of Toronto Dufferin Street Avenue Study Transportation Master Plan

US 19 Sunset Point Rd to Countryside Blvd.

KING STREET TRANSIT PILOT

Multimodal Planning Studies

Hospital Link Project Project Update Winter 2018

Sound Transit Operations June 2016 Service Performance Report. Ridership

Corridor Analysis. Corridor Objectives and Strategies Express Local Limited Stop Overlay on Local Service 1 Deadhead

Strategic Signal Timing Changes = BIG Results. Barbara Jones, PE, PTOE DGL Consulting Engineers, LLC Senior Traffic Engineer

Reducing Garbage-In for Discrete Choice Model Estimation

Northeast Corridor Transportation Update

Christ Church Grammar School, Claremont

Proposals for the Harrogate Road / New Line Junction Improvement Scheme. August / September Supported by:

November 11, 2009 BY . Planning and Growth Management Department 110 Laurier Avenue West, 4 th Floor Ottawa, Ontario K1P 1J1. Dear Mr.

11th and Vermont Streets Special General Land Use Plan (GLUP) Study

Arlington County Board Meeting Project Briefing. October 20, 2015

Downtown Skokie & Oakton Street Corridor Study (Draft)

EAST LINK EXTENSION 2017 SEPA Addendum

Request to Improve Transit along the Dufferin Street Corridor

Sky Temporary Car Park Transport Statement

Queuing Theory and Traffic Flow CIVL 4162/6162

Elementary Drop-off/Pick-up Procedures General Information

Appendix H: North Corridor Alternatives Through Western University - July 2017

Transcription:

Arlington Public Schools Wilson School Site Evaluation Traffic Analysis and Pick-up/Drop-off location Building Level Planning Committee March 30, 2016 1 SAN ANTONIO-BEXAR COUNTY PEDESTRIAN SAFETY ACTION PLAN

Review traffic impact analysis of school traffic Includes pipeline developments Includes assumptions about staff and student travel Analyzes peak hour for arrival and dismissal Share issues and opportunities for Parent drop-off Vehicular transportation network 2

What we analyzed Arrival peak hour (8:20-9:20AM) Dismissal peak hour (3:15-4:15PM) 12 study intersections (see right) Vehicular delay, Level of Service and queuing Impact of pipeline developments 3

Add figure and table 4

Trip generation, an estimate of the number of vehicle trips that can be expected, is an essential part of the traffic analysis Includes: Students, Buses, Staff, Visitors Students, both being dropped off and driving themselves, represent the largest number of trips arriving and leaving the school site 5

Looked at three group of students separately Grades 6-8, Grades 9-10, and Grades 11-12 Travel choices vary between groups Likelihood of mode change from current based on Geographic location of school Improved access to transit Cost of parking for students Student surveys 6

80% High School (11-12 Grades) 70% 60% Current Future 50% 40% 30% 20% 0% 37% 30% 25% 27% 17% 16% 12% 8% 8% 2% Drop-off Carpool Drive Alone School Bus Transit Walk/Bike 231 students (11 th &12 th grades) 7 Carpool

80% High School (11-12 Grades) 70% 60% Current Future 50% 40% 30% 20% 0% 37% 30% 25% 27% 17% 16% 12% 8% 8% 2% Drop-off Carpool Drive Alone School Bus Transit Walk/Bike 231 students (11 th &12 th grades) 8 Carpool

80% 70% 60% 50% 40% High School (9-10 Grades) 63% 61% Current Future 30% 20% 0% 28% 22% 5% 3% 7% 3% 1% Drop-off Carpool Drive Alone School Bus Transit Walk/Bike 231 students (9 th &10 th grades) 9 Carpool

80% 70% 60% 50% 40% Middle School (6-8 Grades) 76% Current Future 30% 20% 0% 17% 19% 2% 0% Drop-off Carpool Drive Alone School Bus Transit Walk/Bike 0% 5% 253 students (6 th -8 th grades) 10 Carpool

HB Woodlawn and Stratford Program at Wilson Site Arrival Peak Hour IN OUT TOTAL Students Drop Offs/Carpool 112 112 224 Students Drive Alone/Carpool 22 0 22 Staff 1 68 0 68 Visitors 4 4 8 Buses 2 21 21 42 TOTAL 227 137 364 3 246 student trips 1 Assumes a 94% drive rate. 2 Assumes 8 Stratford buses and 13 H-B Woodlawn buses. 3 - Compared to 295 trips at dismissal peak hour. Also, this is approximately 5% fewer trips at the Wilson site than the current arrival peak hour at the current school location. 11

Vehicular * transportation network Some intersections may require signal timing changes or additional turn lanes may be needed* One-way streets and offset intersections limit access somewhat Remote drop-off * * * * * * 12

Considerations include: Balance of convenience and proximity Avoid potential congestion along Quinn Street Avoid circuitous routes Observe and assess after several months experience 13

Parent drop-off analysis includes both: How do students being dropped off ARRIVE? How do parents dropping students off LEAVE? Several options being considered: All drop-off on east side of Quinn Street Additional, remote drop-off on Key Blvd, east of Quinn Street Additional, remote drop-off on Quinn Street, north of Key Blvd 14

112 inbound drop-off trips 45% Drop-off lane 15 25% 20%

20% 112 outbound drop-off trips 30% Drop-off lane 16 15% 15%

45% Remote drop-off 112 inbound drop-off trips Drop-off lane 17 25% 20%

Remote drop-off 20% 112 outbound drop-off trips 30% Drop-off lane 18 15% 15%

Remote drop-off Drop-off lane 45% 5% 112 inbound drop-off trips 19 25% 20%

Remote drop-off 20% 112 outbound drop-off trips 30% Drop-off lane 20 15% 15%

Location needs to be both convenient for parents and provide a direct and safe connection for students. It will be important to observe and assess after school opens 21

Currently working on school bus management for arrival and dismissal Assume both schools use 18 th Street along school and park properties Factoring streetscaping and roadway design Shortly, we will present considerations, options and recommendations 22

23