RISING PERFORMANCE. Civil aviation is an outlier. It s BY ERIK DAHLBERG

Similar documents
AUGUST 2017 GNSS REVIEW. Survey Economics Chances of success. Mobile Mapping Airport scanning. Stag s Leap Winery Pre-construction plan

AERONAUTICAL SURVEYS & INSTRUMENT FLIGHT PROCEDURES

LAUNCHING YOUR UNMANNED AIRCRAFT PROGRAM

TANZANIA CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY AIR NAVIGATION SERVICES INSPECTORATE. Title: CONSTRUCTION OF VISUAL AND INSTRUMENT FLIGHT PROCEDURES

Using LiDAR for Precise Vegetation Management

Regional implementation of Electronic Terrain and Obstacle data (e-tod) (Presented by Jeppesen)

AERONAUTICAL SERVICES ADVISORY MEMORANDUM (ASAM) Focal Point: Gen

Appendix C AIRPORT LAYOUT PLANS

Saint Petersburg-Clearwater International Airport. Airspace & Instrument Approach Analysis

USE OF 3D GIS IN ANALYSIS OF AIRSPACE OBSTRUCTIONS

Airport Safety Management Systems: Integrating Planning Into the Process

CLASS SPECIFICATION 5/12/11 SENIOR AIRPORT ENGINEER, CODE 7257

FAA Update. Dakota-Minnesota (DMA) Airports District Office. Federal Aviation Administration. Presented to: By: Date: South Dakota Airports Conference

UAS to GIS Utilizing a low-cost Unmanned Aerial System (UAS) for Coastal Erosion Monitoring

RNP AR APCH Approvals: An Operator s Perspective

Airport Obstruction Standards

DRAFT MASTER PLAN UPDATE

AERODROME LICENCE APPLICATION PROCESS

DP-7 The need for QMS controlled processes in AIS/AIM. Presentation to QMS for AIS/MAP Service Implementation Workshop Dakar, Senegal, May 2011

According to FAA Advisory Circular 150/5060-5, Airport Capacity and Delay, the elements that affect airfield capacity include:

AEROVISION AUGMENTED REALITY AIRPORTS IN 3D Young Professionals Innovation Competition Daniel Schoenberg, RS&H Jill Geboy, Jacobs Engineering Daniel

Aircraft Noise. Why Aircraft Noise Calculations? Aircraft Noise. SoundPLAN s Aircraft Noise Module

Air Navigation Bureau ICAO Headquarters, Montreal

GEOMATIC ASSESSMENT Membership Directory & Buyers Guide 97th Annual Conference Recap WINTER 2017/18

Andres Lainoja Eesti Lennuakadeemia

OBSTACLE IDENTIFICATION SURFACE CALCULATION TOOL (OIS CT) FOR AIRPORT AIRSPACE OBSTRUCTION ANALYSES AT CIVIL AIRPORTS IN THE UNITED STATES

RNP OPERATIONS. We will now explain the key concepts that should not be mixed up and that are commonly not precisely understood.

POST-IMPLEMENTATION COMMUNITY IMPACT REVIEW

SAFETY. Global Safety Network (GSN) Diploma Programme

agis a brief overview

International Civil Aviation Organization. PBN Airspace Concept. Victor Hernandez

From AIS To AIM. Agenda. Agenda. Jack Hsu Mark Varellas

FINAL REPORT. of civil aviation safety investigation. No. I Date: Artem Avia, Ucraine. Genex Ltd., Belarus

TERMS OF REFERENCE (Revision 9) Special Committee (SC) 213 Enhanced Flight Vision Systems/Synthetic Vision Systems

FLIGHT PATH FOR THE FUTURE OF MOBILITY

HEAD-UP DISPLAY (HUD), EQUIVALENT DISPLAYS AND VISION SYSTEMS

Staff Instruction. Aerial Assessment Requirements Prior to Heliport Certification

Competency of Surveyors

Menlo Park Fire District Training Division. Unmanned Aerial System Pilot

Surveillance and Broadcast Services

Agenda: SASP SAC Meeting 3

Geospatial Data Collection for the FAA Airports GIS Program

POST-IMPLEMENTATION COMMUNITY IMPACT REVIEW

Launching a New Surveying Perspective

1) Rescind the MOD (must meet the standard); 2) Issue a new MOD which reaffirms the intent of the previous MOD; 3) Issue a new MOD with revisions.

Flight Procedure Design and Cartography

Part 77 CAA Consolidation 1 April 2014 Objects and Activities Affecting Navigable Airspace

UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS (UAS) IN UTILITIES

How to Use Drones in Stormwater Management January 17, :30 a.m. 11:30 a.m. (Eastern)

Optimizing trajectories over the 4DWeatherCube

Safety, Infrastructure, and Tenant Improvement Project. Public Hearing Informational Brochure February 26, 2013

Consideration will be given to other methods of compliance which may be presented to the Authority.

Enter here your Presentation Title 1

1.1.3 Taxiways. Figure 1-15: Taxiway Data. DRAFT Inventory TYPICAL PAVEMENT CROSS-SECTION LIGHTING TYPE LENGTH (FEET) WIDTH (FEET) LIGHTING CONDITION

Mr. Chairman, Members of the Committee, I am Chet Fuller, President GE Aviation

RNP In Daily Operations

OPERATIONS CIRCULAR 01/2012. Subject: HEAD-UP DISPLAYS (HUD) AND ENHANCED VISION SYSTEMS (EVS)

Frequently Asked Questions and Answers Bowman Field Airport Area Safety Program

Analyzing Risk at the FAA Flight Systems Laboratory

B GEORGIA INFRASTRUCTURE REPORT CARD AVIATION RECOMMENDATIONS DEFINITION OF THE ISSUE. Plan and Fund for the Future:

Got Mountains? Challenges of Modeling SRTM and Other Terrain Data to Suit Aviation Applications

Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data

CHAPTER 5 AEROPLANE PERFORMANCE OPERATING LIMITATIONS

CFIT-Procedure Design Considerations. Use of VNAV on Conventional. Non-Precision Approach Procedures

WORKING TOGETHER TO ENHANCE AIRPORT OPERATIONAL SAFETY. Ermenando Silva APEX, in Safety Manager ACI, World

PRO LINE FUSION UPGRADE FOR YOUR CITATION CJ3. Your all-in-one approach for airspace modernization and situational awareness.

PRO LINE FUSION INTEGRATED AVIONICS SYSTEM. Pro Line Fusion on Gulfstream G280: Your direct path to see and access more.

Advisory Circular CT

TANZANIA CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY SAFETY REGULATION CHECKLIST FOR INSPECTION OF SURFACE MOVEMENT GUIDANCE CONTROL SYSTEM (SMGCS)

AIRSPACE PROTECTION. Guidance and considerations for development in the vicinity of Ohio s airports and heliports

Chapter Six ALP Drawings. Tacoma Narrows Airport. Master Plan Update

Overview ICAO Standards and Recommended Practices for Aerodrome Safeguarding

CHAPTER 3 ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED

EXPERIMENTAL OPERATING LIMITATIONS EXHIBITION GROUP I1

Office of Airports. Overview of the FAA s. Federal Aviation Administration ACI-NA/AAAE Airport Board & Commissioners Conference Indianapolis, IN

Potential Uses and Considerations Regarding the Use of UAS Technology in Assessment. January 2015 Frank Giuffrida

Operational Benefits, Affordability and Availability

AUTHORITATIVE AIRPORT DATA FOR CRITICAL FLIGHT SAFETY AND AUTOMATED SITUATIONAL AWARENESS MEETS FAA (USA) AND ICAO (INT'L) REQUIREMENTS

Operators may need to retrofit their airplanes to ensure existing fleets are properly equipped for RNP operations. aero quarterly qtr_04 11

Commercial Pilot Practical Test Briefing

Spatio-temporal Data Analysis and Visualization in Enterprise Level Automated Application

Advancing FTD technologies and the opportunity to the pilot training journey. L3 Proprietary

Performance Based Navigation (PBN) Implementation Plan. The Gambia

UAV Flight Services Company. What We Do. What Sets us Apart

Innovations in Aviation Flow Management REDUCING CONGESTION AND INCREASING CAPACITY

Preliminary Findings of Proposed Alternative

DP-3 ICAO Electronic Terrain and. Amendments 33 & 36

FLIGHT OPERATIONS PANEL

MetroAir Virtual Airlines

Source: Chippewa Valley Regional Airport ASOS, Period of Record

Título ponencia: Introduction to the PBN concept

REGULATION No. 10/2011 ON APPROVAL OF FLIGHT PROCEDURES INCLUDING SID-s AND STAR-s. Article 1 Scope of Application

NATIONAL AIRSPACE POLICY OF NEW ZEALAND

Aerodrome Obstacle Survey Information Checks

Head-up Guidance & Vision Technologies Enabling Safer and More Efficient Airline Operations

Flight Inspection for High Elevation Airports

Kittitas County Airport Bowers Field Airport Master Plan Planning Advisory Committee Meeting #1 April 6, 2016

3-D GIS Applications in Aviation and Aerospace Pedagogy Dr. Rich Snow, Dr. Mary Snow, and Mario Westphal. Abstract

AERODROME SAFETY COORDINATION

TWELFTH AIR NAVIGATION CONFERENCE

Transcription:

RISING PERFORMANCE Compact mobile mapping systems can be installed on small passenger cars. Civil aviation is an outlier. It s among the few industries where tight government regulations are widely accepted and with good reason. The aviation industry s exceptional record of safety and efficiency comes as a direct result of tightly defined and consistent regulations for equipment, infrastructure and procedures in the air and on the ground. BY ERIK DAHLBERG But it s not easy. In order to maintain certification, airports and facilities must be able to document that they are in compliance with national and international requirements. As a result, the civil aviation industry has become one of the most demanding consumers of geospatial data. The basic need is not new. In a situation experienced by geospatial professionals around the world, aviation clients want information that is accurate and up-to-date. The difference lies in the details how, where and by whom the data will be used helps determine the best approach to collecting, managing and analyzing field information. For airports, the work to gather and maintain the needed information can be a daunting task. In western Romania, SC Gauss LLC, a surveying consultancy in the city of Timisoara, uses a blend of geospatial technologies to provide precise information on airport facilities and airspace obstructions. According to Cristian Iosub, head of GPS and mobile

Scanning data from the mobile mapping system at the TVIA terminal area. The system used lidar and imagery to produce detailed database of airport assets. regulations. At the same time, the work could demonstrate Gauss s capability to handle large, complex projects. Obstacle analyses around the Timisoara airport. Gauss combined computed surfaces with existing maps and elevation data to identify potential obstacles. mapping at Gauss, the new solutions have opened a significant business opportunity. Gauss initiated work in 2014 to gather geospatial data for the Timisoara Traian Vuia International Airport (TVIA). The airport serves Timisoara, Romania s third-largest city and the economic hub of western Romania. According to the most recent available data, in 2015 TVIA handled more than 924,000 passengers and 12,000 aircraft takeoffs and landings. Iosub said the project presented Gauss with an opportunity to establish a long-term relationship with an important client by enabling TVIA to document compliance with ICAO Detail versus Distance Airports are notoriously busy and complex places. Their operations are subject to exacting specifications for construction and maintenance of infrastructure including runways, taxiways, parking areas, terminal buildings and myriad utilities, fuel systems and supporting facilities. In much of the world, the regulations are set by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), a specialized agency of the United Nations that maintains policies and standards for safe, efficient and sustainable operation of global civil aviation. The Romanian Civil Aviation Authority (AACR) sets aviation standards for Romania; AACR rules closely follow the ICAO regulations. (Regulations of the U.S. Federal Aviation Agency (FAA) also closely align with ICAO.)

The ICAO specifications for airports are exacting. There are details about everything from runway dimensions and materials down to aircraft parking spaces and placement of lights and signs in the airfield. It s essential for airports to comply with the ICAO and national regulations. Loss of certification could cause civil and commercial aviation to drop off, which would result in serious economic losses to the region served by the airport. The onus for compliance falls to the individual airports. They must be able to document and demonstrate conformance with applicable regulations. In order to do so, airport operators must know the location of every component of airport infrastructure an ideal application for geospatial technology. But the ICAO requirements extend well beyond the airport fences. In order to ensure safety for aircraft servicing the airport, the regulations require airspaces surrounding an airport to be free of obstacles. The airspaces are described using Obstacle Limitation Surfaces, which delineate the extents of airspace around the airport that are covered by Point cloud image of the tarmac at Traian Vula International Airport. For the airfield surveys, Gauss crews combined mobile lidar with GNSS. After initial processing, technicians moved data from the Trimble system into a GIS database. restrictions on structures that protrude into the airspace. The surfaces are defined by the distance from the airfield and relationship to routine and emergency flight paths followed by aircraft approaching or departing the airport. Airport operators need to identify objects that might protrude into the airspace and capture data on the location and height of the object. Because the height of the limitation surface above the ground varies as the terrain changes around the airport, accurate elevation data is essential.

The view from the mapping vehicle. The team completed the airport survey in under four hours. Iosub explained that there are big differences between the information needed for airfield assets versus the obstacle limitation surfaces. Certification and compliance for airport design needs detail on thousands of assets with centimeter precision, he said. It covers several square kilometers to include all on-airport facilities. In contrast, obstacle limitation needs less detail, but covers a much larger area surrounding the airport. The required precision goes down as the distance from the airport increases. To meet the different requirements, Gauss called on its array of positioning tools and expertise. The technologies included mobile mapping using a vehiclemounted scanner, camera and positioning system as well as survey-grade GNSS receivers and total stations. Gauss also needed to acquire new expertise for working to ICAO specifications. Iosub traveled to Bucharest to complete special training courses and examinations on ICAO and AACR requirements to become certified for the airport work. Other members of the Gauss teams received training on airport safety and security procedures and passed background checks to be credentialed for access to the airport s secure areas. Gauss surveyors use a total station to measure features not visible to the mobile mapping system. One Airfield, Four Hours To gather information on assets and obstructions, airports typically rely on classical survey data collection. The process provides the required detail and precision, but can be very time consuming. Additionally, because the presence of survey teams can affect aircraft operations, much of the work must take place at night or during other slow periods, further adding to the time and expense of data acquisition. Gauss decided to bypass many of the challenges by using mobile mapping technologies for much of the work. The company had purchased a Trimble MX2 vehicle-mounted spatial imaging system the previous year for use in highway corridor surveys. Iosub knew that, when used in conjunction with precise GNSS, the MX2 could provide the precision, accuracy and speed needed for the airport project. The mobile mapping work commenced in April 2016. As part of initial

The Gauss team used RTK GNSS to locate potential obstacles outside of the airfield perimeter. project planning, Gauss personnel identified a series of WGS84 geodetic control points at TVIA. They conducted static GNSS measurements to confirm the points locations and stability. One point would serve as a reference station for the GNSS measurements during the mobile mapping. A Trimble NetR9 GNSS Reference Receiver with a Trimble Zephyr Geodetic Antenna installed over the designated station collected data for GNSS post processing. The other stations could be used as check points for quality control. In order to meet ICAO requirements, Gauss needed to map an area at the airport measuring roughly 5.5 km by 0.8 km. While the MX2 lidar sensors have a range of 250 m, Iosub decided that working at a shorter range would provide higher data density. The team divided the project into strips 120 m wide. With the MX2 installed on a small car, they could drive along the center of each strip at a speed of 20 km per hour. With the control and route planning in place, the Gauss team started driving. Each run collected roughly 9 million 3D points along with georeferenced imagery. They completed the survey of the airport in less than 4 hours and collected about 330 million points. An aerial image of TVIA includes flight paths and restricted airspace. Because of the short time required for data collection, the team could easily work around the airport s busy periods for aircraft operations. For the initial post processing, Iosub used Applanix POSPac Mobile Mapping software. The software combined data from the GNSS and inertial instruments in the MX2 to produce a precise trajectory of the lidar and camera mapping sensors. Next, the team used Trimble Trident software to process the lidar data into a point cloud and merge the imagery with the 3D data. They also used Trident to extract specific features and measurements from the lidar data. The Gauss team followed a comprehensive quality assurance process for the survey and data extraction. Using RTK GNSS tied to the Romanian national grid (Rompos), they verified key points and features and provided an independent check on the accuracy and consistency of the lidar results. The team also used a Trimble R10 GNSS receiver and Trimble S7 total station to locate certain additional features not captured by the MX2.

Purple dots indicate potential obstacles near the airport. Required precision decreased based on distance from the airfield. The conventional data was loaded to Trimble Business Center software (TBC) for processing and analysis of the survey information. Mapping Safe Airspaces The next part of the work took the Gauss staff outside of the airfield fences, where they needed to identify and measure objects that could potentially penetrate TVIA s Obstacle Limitation Surfaces. ICAO specifications define two areas for locating obstacles based on distance from the airport. Objects in the so-called Area Two can be located with precisions of tens of meters. But in Area One, closer to the airfield, Gauss needed locations with precision of three to five meters. Iosub and the team defined the two areas and created a software model of obstruction surfaces. They combined the model with national maps to identify potential obstructions, pulling information from government databases to obtain rough elevation and locations of potential obstacles. In the field they used a total station or GNSS to capture location and elevation of the base of the obstacles. Using defined forms for data collection, they captured accurate locations, with total station or lidar measurements providing the height of the object. A New Opportunity Takes Off The airport survey produced a large, detailed database of the entire airfield and surrounding facilities. Gauss can use the points and imagery to extract information including runway dimensions and profiles, lighting and markings on runways and taxiways. The company provided free Trident Viewer software to TVIA, which enabled airport officials to visualize the site and request specific information. Gauss also transferred the airfield data into an Esri ArcMap database. Iosub remains in frequent contact with airport officials, who often request additional information or detailed measurements. In nearly all cases, he can provide data quickly it s simply a matter of extracting the new information from the Trident or ArcMap databases. TVIA has prepared photos and movies using the Trident Viewer, which they use to provide measurements and visual proof of compliance. The data enables the airport to pass inspections without the need for extra visits to the field. The work required a significant investment by Gauss in training and certification, but Iosub feels it was a good business decision. It s not over yet, he said. The client needed the data quickly and we were able to satisfy their needs. They trust us and continue to ask for additional information. Iosub expects to do another survey soon and will use the data to update and maintain the point cloud and master database. The work at Timisoara is opening new doors for Gauss. The European Union has a lot of requirements for airport regulations, Iosub explained. We have demonstrated that we can gather data quickly and work with the regulations. Other airports are already asking about it. Investing in new tools and expertise makes it easier to do complex projects and attract new business. Erik Dahlberg is a writer specializing in the geomatics, civil engineering and construction industries. Drawing on extensive training and experience, Dahlberg focuses on applications and innovations in equipment, software and techniques.