Creating a User-Driven Long-Distance OHV Trail Through Partnering

Similar documents
FINAL TESTIMONY 1 COMMITTEE ON RESOURCES UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES. July 13, 2005 CONCERNING. Motorized Recreational Use of Federal Lands

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT MANUAL TRANSMITTAL SHEET

Rogue River Access and Management Plan Draft Alternatives

TRAIL USER PERMIT FEE NATURAL RESOURCES, AGRICULTURE AND ENVIRONMENT INTERIM COMMITTEE

March 14, SUBJECT: Public input to the Bureau of Land Management, Gunnison Field Office, Travel Management Plan

BACKCOUNTRY TRAIL FLOOD REHABILITATION PROGRAM

Steve Holdsambeck District Ranger Spring Mountains National Recreation Area

Securing Permanent Protection for Public Land

System Group Meeting #1. March 2014

Kelly Motorized Trails Project Proposed Action

Proposed Action. Payette National Forest Over-Snow Grooming in Valley, Adams and Idaho Counties. United States Department of Agriculture

General Aviation Land Use Planning

Paiute Trail Hatfield-McCoy Highwood Mountains

RE: Access Fund Comments on Yosemite National Park Wilderness Stewardship Plan, Preliminary Ideas and Concepts

Preferred Recreation Recommendations Stemilt-Squilchuck Recreation Plan March 2018

White Mountain National Forest Saco Ranger District

Daisy Dean Trail 628/619 ATV Trail Construction

Wilderness Areas Designated by the White Pine County bill

DOWNLOAD OR READ : THESE AMERICAN LANDS PARKS WILDERNESS AND THE PUBLIC LANDS REVISED AND EXPANDED EDITION PDF EBOOK EPUB MOBI

U.S. Forest Service - Pacific Southwest Region Dispersed Camping & Game Retrieval Guidance

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT REPORT PURPOSE EXISTING SETTING EXPANDING PARKLAND

Blueways: Rivers, lakes, or streams with public access for recreation that includes fishing, nature observation, and opportunities for boating.

H. R IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

TABLE COUNTY REGIONAL PARKS AND COMMUNITY PARKS IN THE DESERT REGION

City of Durango 5.8 FUNDING TRAILS DEVELOPMENT

Lecture 08, 22 Sep 2003 Role Playing. Conservation Biology ECOL 406R/506R University of Arizona Fall Kevin Bonine

ANAGEMENT P LAN. February, for Elk Lakes and Height of the Rockies Provincial Parks. Ministry of Environment, Lands and Parks BC Parks Division

Hermosa Area Preservation The Colorado Trail Foundation 4/11/2008

To: Cam Hooley From: Trails 2000 Date: September 30, 2016 Re: Hermosa Comments. Dear Cam:

2016 Regional Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) Grant Application

HIGHWAY 17 WILDLIFE and REGIONAL TRAIL CROSSINGS

112th CONGRESS. 1st Session H. R. 113 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

Decision Memo Broken Wheel Ranch Equestrian Outfitter Special-Use Permit Proposed Action

Proposed Scotchman Peaks Wilderness Act 2016 (S.3531)

GRAND JUNCTION FIELD OFFICE. Travel Management Plan U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management

Special Recreation Management Areas Extensive Recreation Management Areas Public Lands Not Designated as Recreation Management Areas

Decision Memo Sun Valley Super Enduro & Cross-Country Mountain Bike Race. Recreation Event

APPENDIX. Alberta Land Stewardship Act AMENDMENTS TO THE SOUTH SASKATCHEWAN REGIONAL PLAN

Continental Divide National Scenic Trail Legislative History and Planning Guidance

5.0 OUTDOOR RECREATION OPPORTUNITIES AND MANAGEMENT

USGS Efforts to Consolidate Geospatial Data in the Federal Government

Logo Department Name Agency Organization Organization Address Information 5700 North Sabino Canyon Road

National Forests and Grasslands in Texas

F. Forest Recreation Management

Flow Stand Up Paddle Board Parkway Plan Analysis

LEAVE NO TRACE CENTER FOR OUTDOOR ETHICS CONSULTING SERVICES

Existing Resource Information

MONTEREY REGIONAL AIRPORT MASTER PLAN TOPICAL QUESTIONS FROM THE PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE AND TOPICAL RESPONSES

PROPOSED ACTION South 3000 East Salt Lake City, UT United States Department of Agriculture

Lakes Landscape Travel Management

Emily to Blind Lake Trail PROPOSED TRAIL DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY

MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE

SOCIAL CONFLICT BETWEEN MOTORIZED AND NON-MOTORIZED RECREATIONAL ACTIVITIES.

METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 390 North Robert Street, St. Paul, MN Phone (651) TDD (651)

Outdoor Recreation Opportunities Management

The Chu property is a 6.57 acre parcel located in the Town of Superior on the west side of McCaslin Boulevard. In 2014, the Town of Superior acquired

French Fire Recovery and Restoration Project Wilderness Resource Impact Analysis

National Wilderness Steering Committee

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed action to add trails and trailheads to the Red Rock District trail system.

DECISION MEMO. Rawhide Trail #7073 Maintenance and Reconstruction

Decision Memo Ice Age Trail Improvement (CRAC 37)

As outlined in the Tatshenshini-Alsek Park Management Agreement, park management will:

Chapter 6: POLICY AND PROCEDURE RECOMMENDATIONS

Dumont Dunes Special Recreation Management Area (SRMA)

AGENCY SCOPING MEETING

Lassen National Forest Over-snow Vehicle Use Designation

A. GENERAL COMMENTS:

Buffalo Pass Trails Project

GREENWOOD VEGETATION MANAGEMENT

10/25/2013. What is the SCORP?! 2013 Local Government Survey 2013 Statewide Public Survey Advisory Group Priority Areas Your Suggestions!

COASTAL CONSERVANCY. Staff Recommendation December 2, 2004 COYOTE HELLYER COUNTY PARK BAY AREA RIDGE TRAIL

Longmont to Boulder Regional Trail Jay Road Connection DRAFT FINAL REPORT

Project Planning, Compliance, and Funding

WORKSHEET 1 Wilderness Qualities or Attributes Evaluating the Effects of Project Activities on Wilderness Attributes

FEASIBILITY CRITERIA

Chambers of Commerce and Lake Groups advertised this NCWRPC created online survey that was : Opened: August 22, 2012; and Closed: October 4, 2012.

3.7 BLM Land Designations, Classifications, Allocations, and Wilderness Inventory

Appendix 1: Best Management Practices For Hang Gliding and Paragliding in Jasper National Parks

LOCAL PLAN FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF THE APPALACHIAN TRAIL IN MAINE. (GRAFTON NOTCH TO KATAHDIN) 1 January 2013 (Revised 5 February 2014)

Chapter 1 Introduction and Project Overview

Mississippi River Parkway Commission of Minnesota

Shelf Road Recreation Area 2015 BLM Annual Report of Rocky Mountain Field Institute Stewardship Under BLM Agreement L12AC20483 November 19, 2015

Arizona National Scenic Trail

Section II. Planning & Public Process Planning for the Baker/Carver Regional Trail began in 2010 as a City of Minnetrista initiative.

Chatsworth Branch Library Devonshire Street, Chatsworth, CA Thursday, November 16, :00-8:00 pm

RIM TRAIL EXTENSION PROJECT

Tahoe National Forest Over-Snow Vehicle Use Designation

NON-MOTORIZED TRAIL RECREATION IN IDAHO

Land Management Summary

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT May 10, Members of the Planning Commission. Joyce Parker-Bozylinski, Contract Planner

Wilderness Process #NP-1810: Your letter ID is NP September 5, 2018

Stevenson Ranch Library The Old Road, Stevenson Ranch, CA Thursday, November 9, :00-8:00 pm

St. Joe Travel Management EA CULTURAL RESOURCES

USDI, BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT BURNS DISTRICT HINES, OREGON 97738

County of Sonoma Agenda Item Summary Report

September 14, Comments of the Colorado Trail Foundation On the USFS Scoping Notice of August 13, 2010 RE: the relocation of the CDNST/CT Page 1

ECONOMIC PROFILE. Tourism

AIRPORT LAND USE COMPATILIBILTY AIRPORT LAND USE COMPATIBILIITY

Thank you for this third opportunity to comment on the proposed revisions to the Coconino National Forest Management plan.

LESSON 9 Recognizing Recreational Benefits of Wilderness

Transcription:

Joseph Raffaele Outdoor Recreation Planner U.S. Bureau of Land Management Yuma, Arizona Creating a User-Driven Long-Distance OHV Trail Through Partnering

BLM is a multiple-use land management agency within the U.S. Department of the Interior whose mission is to sustain the health, diversity, and productivity of the public lands for the use and enjoyment of present and future generations.

BLM Arizona Districts

BLM Yuma Field Office YFO manages 1.2 million acres in SW Arizona and SE California including 155 miles of Lower Colorado River 4 wilderness areas (Muggins, Trigos, New Waters, & Eagletails) 1 Area of Critical Environmental Concern Significant archeological and historic sites Juan Bautista de Anza National Historic Trail Betty s Kitchen National Recreation Trail and Watchable Wildlife Area

BLM s LaPosa Long -Term Visitor Area (LTVA) in Quartzsite, AZ 11,400 acre BLM LaPosa Long-Term Campground located 2 miles south of Quartzsite, AZ Thousands of winter visitors (snowbirds) spend up to 7 months each winter OHV s are very popular with the winter campers Quartzsite is famous for its large rock and car shows Rock collectors love the surrounding desert geology Wild horses and burros, deer, bighorn sheep, and coyotes can be seen in the surrounding area 5

Numerous Resource Issues are created from Thousands of Long-Term Campers and OHV Users

Introduction to Travel Management BLM is currently moving from an existing roads and trails travel policy to a limited to a designated roads and trails travel policy across the western U.S. BLM s Comprehensive Travel Management Planning covers both motorized and non-motorized uses of the public lands. Each road and trail will be systematically evaluated to ensure that all resource values, resource uses, and resource conflicts are considered.

Introduction to Travel Management Development of travel management plans is a collaborative process and the BLM will consider all reasonable alternatives proposed from any interested stakeholder. End result is a better signed and mapped road and trail network that provides safe trail-based recreation opportunities. Opportunity to develop partnerships and volunteerism to establish, manage, monitor, and maintain an environmentally compatible road and trail network.

National BLM Travel Management Policies Federal Lands Policy and Management Act of 1976 Executive Orders 11644 and 11989: Use of off-road vehicles on the public lands Code of Federal Regulations, Title 43, Part 8340: Off-road vehicles BLM Land Use Planning Handbook Appendix C: Program/ Resource-Specific Guidance BLM Instruction Memorandum No. 2008-014

Executive Orders 11644 and 11989: Use of Off-Road Vehicles on Public Lands (codified at 43 CFR 8340) Areas and trails shall be located to minimize damage to soil, watershed, vegetation, and other resources of the public lands; harassment of wildlife or significant disruption to wildlife habitats; conflicts between off-road vehicle use and other existing or proposed recreational uses of the same or neighboring public lands, and to ensure the compatibility of such uses with existing conditions in populated areas, taking into account noise and other factors.

Travel Management Plan Objectives Systematically evaluate each route to ensure that all resource values, resource uses, and resource conflicts are considered Sensitive resources Public access needs Commercial activities Administrative uses Recreation activities User conflicts Hazards and safety concerns

BLM Arizona Travel Management Areas

La Posa Travel Management Area 384,600 acres (600 square miles) of BLM land in La Paz and Yuma Counties Urban-interface lands around Quartzsite, Arizona Bisected by Interstate 10 and Highway 95

La Posa Travel Management Area Borders the BLM Lake Havasu Field Office, Colorado River Indian Reservation, Kofa National Wildlife Refuge, and U.S. Army-Yuma Proving Ground Includes private property and Arizona State Trust Land inholdings Numerous authorized and maintained roads

La Posa Travel M anagement Plan Objectives Designate all routes in the planning area as open, closed, or limited to motorized and non-motorized uses. Provide consideration for all modes of recreational travel, including off-highway vehicle use, hiking, mountain biking, and horseback riding. Identify and authorize specific route monitoring, maintenance, and mitigation needs.

BLM s Travel Management Planning Process Route Inventory Route Evaluation Route Designation Implementation Monitoring

LaPosa TMA Route Inventory from 2010 Yuma Resource Management Plan

LaPosa TMA Sub -Units Used for Route Evaluations

Route Evaluation Tree Process Systematic and objective route-by-route analysis of beneficial and negative impacts from motorized and non-motorized travel Data from scientific research, GIS databases, inventories, lands and realty documents, interagency input, and public comment is compiled for planning area Interdisciplinary team inputs data into software pertaining to individual route location, including any monitoring, maintenance, and other mitigation needs

Every Route is Examined by a Multi-Disciplinary and Multi-Agency Team and a Route Report is Generated (Average 4 Pages)

A NEPA Analysis is then Conducted by the I nterdisciplinary Team F o u r D i f f e r e n t A l t e r n a t i v e s w e r e E x a m i n e d Four Alternatives A. No Action B. Least Restrictive C. In-Between (Proposed) D. Most Restrictive

A Partner Proposes a Trail: A local OHV user group (partner) called the Arizona Sunrider s requests that BLM develop a long-distance OHV trail as part of the LaPosa TMP They presented a map of their proposed trail route with backing by local government officials Their idea is to bring economic prosperity based on increased OHV use on the trail and national marketability for tourism Their proposed route crosses multiple federal, state, and local jurisdictions Their Concept is based on a similar multi-jurisdictional trail in Utah called the Paiute Trail

The Paiute Trail is an extensive trail developed primarily by the Forest Service and the BLM and which crosses multiple public and private jurisdictions

BLM took the Sunrider s Complete Trail Proposal and Overlaid it onto USGS Topo s and added a land ownership/ management layer

The Trail Proposal was then layered onto to a Colorado River District BLM Boundary Map

The Decision: The Sunriders Trail Proposal will be Signed Upon Implementation of the TMP as a Distinct Trail with Unique Identifying Signage

Q. Who are BLM s Partners in this Complicated Process? A. Anyone that wants to be part of it!!! There are numerous federal, state, and local agencies involved due to the extensive amount of land involved. Also user groups like the AZ Sunriders and even individual volunteers Local agencies are very interested in the process due to the possibility of route closures leading to decreased tourism dollars In this case we expect to see economic improvements due to a marketable long-distance OHV trail being developed

Q. What are the roles of the partners? The federal agencies are assisting in the process as cooperators and adjacent land managers because the trails don t know boundaries The state of Arizona is helping in numerous ways by providing: 1. grant money from the AZ OHV registration sticker fund, 2. the AZ OHV Ambassadors volunteer management Umbrella program, and 3. a representative from the AZ Game and Fish Department to be at all route evaluations which averages 3 full work weeks per year The local government agencies are very interested in economic benefits and potential impacts and are involved in helping BLM reach out to the public and providing locations for public meetings The trail users will help to implement and manage the plan implementation by becoming Ambassadors and trail stewards

W hat is the AZ Ambassadors Program? The Arizona OHV Ambassador program is a newly developed volunteer program that provides a means for private citizens to work with a variety of federal, state, and local land managers and public safety officials in Arizona to promote responsible OHV recreation on public, state, and private lands It is administered by the AZ state parks and provides an umbrella for managing volunteers and cooperative partners working on travel management plan implementation statewide The program provides money from the AZ OHV registration sticker fund for TMP route evaluations and plan implementation including signage and volunteer coordination Thank You Arizona!!!!

A g r e e m e n t s U s e d t o G u i d e t h e P a r t n e r s h i p s 1. Grants Agreement with Arizona State Parks Department for grant funding from their OHV registration sticker fund, $113,000 in 2013 Paid for route evaluation assistance from a renowned TMP development contractor - Advanced Resource Solutions. Also paid for sign purchases and a variety of other implementation costs 2. Cooperative Agreement with the AZ State Parks Ambassadors program to enroll and oversee organized OHV groups which are 501(3)(c) compliant to implement and monitor the plan and trails 3. Volunteer agreements between the BLM and individual OHV enthusiasts who choose not to join the organized OHV groups working with the Ambassadors program

Lessons Learned 1. A project this extensive and complicated requires extensive public outreach and communications. 2. User groups and public buy-in of the plan is critical for it to succeed. If they are not on board they will still travel wherever they want because it is not feasible to physically close the routes, and there is not enough law enforcement to adequately cover such large areas 3. The public and local governments will never feel adequately included in the process if they are not taken seriously and included in all phases of the planning process

Please Tread Lightly and Stay On Existing Roads and Trails Before

After

Questions?