Further details on interventions and funding are available within each Local Area Implementation Plan.

Transcription

1 Greater Manchester Implementation Profiles Local Area Implementation Plans have been prepared for each of the ten District areas in Greater Manchester, and are available on the LTP3 website The Local Transport Plan settlement for to 2014/15 sets the level of funding to local authorities. Within Greater Manchester, all of the funding is committed to major schemes through the Greater Manchester Transport Fund for the first three years, with maintenance allocation being available for all years. The figures shown for the financial years 2012/13 to 2014/15 are currently indicative. Further details on interventions and funding are available within each Local Area Implementation Plan. The key local challenges and spending proposals in the period to 2014/15 are summarised in the following tables. ing on Greater Manchester-wide projects, by the Highways Agency, Network Rail and Transport for Greater Manchester is also summarised below. 1

2 Bolton Key local challenges and priorities for transport to be addressed in the financial years to 2014/15: to focus on the maintenance of the existing highway infrastructure using sound asset management principles; and to work in partnership with Transport for Greater Manchester and others to ensure the delivery of the Bolton Town Centre Public Transport Scheme (Bolton Interchange) and associated highway improvements in Bolton town centre to stimulate regeneration and economic growth, the delivery of improvements to Bolton, Blackrod and Westhoughton rail stations, and subject to funding, Hall i th Wood. Due to the lack of LTP funding available to Bolton for minor works and local safety schemes in the first three years of this LTP, it will be a challenge for Bolton Council to deliver against some priorities. In the early years they will concentrate on maintaining the network through investment in maintenance. They will endeavour to incorporate safety measures into maintenance schemes wherever possible and potentially seek funding from other sources such as the Local Sustainable Transport Fund to promote the use of cycling, walking and public transport. Bolton Programme Minor Schemes LTP Integrated Transport Block programmes (ITB) Public Transport Priority and Infrastructure Schemes as part of Transport Infrastructure Fund Programme 2012/ / /15 Funding Source LTP 5, Transport Infrastructure Fund Main LTP3 Objectives Sub Total 5, Maintenance Maintaining road network 2, BMBC Corporate - Borrowing Carriageways and footways 2,440 2,342 2,231 2,100LTP Bridges 1,241 1,207 1,150 1,083LTP Street lighting LTP Sub Total 5,809 3,659 3,486 3,281 TOTA L 11,309 3,659 3,486 3,856 The figures in the above table reflect a reduced level of funding for minor works for the years to 2013/14 and demonstrate a short term focus on maintenance. In view of longer term funding uncertainty, the figures shown for the financial years 2012/13 to 2014/15 are currently indicative. 2

3 Bury Key local challenges and priorities for transport in the financial years to 2014/15: to maintain the highway network; to implement integrated transport measures to address issues arising from high levels of car use, especially for journeys to work and to school; and to work in partnership with Transport for Greater Manchester to increase the capacity and quality of Metrolink services. Bury Council s programme reflects the current position of Integrated Transport Block funding becoming available at a local level in Year 4 only. Opportunities for alternative funding will be pursued. It should also be noted that the 3 Year Programme requires flexibility to enable works in either Bridges and Structures or Highways Maintenance to move programme years according to changing priorities. It has been assumed that the capital allocation will remain as now but the 3 Year Programme may have to be revised if circumstances change. Bury Programme 2012/ / /15 Funding Source Main LTP3 Objectives Minor Schemes ITB ITB Sub Total Maintenance Bridge Assessments LTP Bridge Works LTP Sub Total Highways Maintenance 1,445 1,401 1,315 1,241 LTP Sub Total 1,445 1,401 1,315 1,241 TOTAL 2,045 1,911 1,790 2,423 The figures in the above table reflect a reduced level of funding for minor works for the years to 2013/14 and demonstrate a short term focus on maintenance In view of longer term funding uncertainty, the figures shown for the financial years 2012/13 to 2014/15 are currently indicative. 3

4 Manchester Key local challenges and priorities for transport to be addressed in in the financial years to 2014/15: to maintain the existing transport assets and system infrastructure, in particular the condition of our roads, pavements, cycle lanes, footpaths and drainage; to ensure that the transport system remains fit for purpose and is able to support people s journeys, the economy and regeneration wards to improve our residents quality of life; and to work in partnership with Transport for Greater Manchester and others to ensure delivery of the GMTF major schemes, Wythenshawe Interchange, improvements to Oxford Road and Victoria rail stations and, subject to funding, Ashburys rail station. The programme has been developed to provide a more specific neighbourhood focus and to establish priorities within individual wards. There are several key developments and network management approaches that will, over time, require significant investments to help drive and accommodate growth, whilst helping to continue the physical transformation of the city and provide residents with access to new jobs and opportunities. Implementing the Transport Strategy for Manchester City Centre is our top transport priority. New urban spaces will be created in the city centre, making a greener more attractive city. Changes to traffic management will encourage more sustainable travel patterns by creating better conditions for pedestrians, cyclists and public transport passengers, which in turn will contribute to reducing carbon and harmful pollutants. Over the next three years where funding is scarce, improvements to the network will be funded either as part of other committed transport schemes or will be taken forward as part of development led activity using contributions from developers to improve highway accessibility for cyclists, pedestrians or public transport passengers. The City Council will continue to fund activities to encourage more residents and workers to make short trips by cycling and walking and for longer journeys help improve travel by public transport and barriers that prevent people from trying bus, tram and train. The figures in the table below reflect a reduced level of funding for minor works for years to 2013/14 and demonstrate a short term focus on maintenance. In view of longer term funding uncertainty, the figures shown for the financial years 2012/13 to 2014/15 are currently indicative. 4

5 Manchester Programme Minor Schemes Advance works (St Peter s Square highway) Walking and Public Realm (St Peter s Square) Highway Network Enhancement (Northern Gateway highways realignment) Northern Gateway Public Realm 2012/ / / MCC ü ü - - 7,250 7,250 MCC ü ü Walking and Public Realm (Greengate-Chapel Street - 2, MCC / Salford CC ü ü footbridge) MCC / ERDF Support for regeneration of Funding for years 2 4,000 - Oxford Road corridor and 3 not yet ü ü ü secured Victoria Contribution 2,000 2,000 11,000 MCC / Network Rail 10,000 / TFGM ü ü ü Improving Bus Journeys 16 Carry over MCC Wythenshawe Interchange 1, LTP2 funding Contribution contribution ü ü Low Emission Buses MCC ü ü Cleaner Vehicles Campaign 3,400 3,400 - Defra Grant/MCC (continuation of campaign in - partnership with ü ü Energy Saving Trust) Capital Maintenance 6,500 3,379 3,224 LTP3 Maintenance / 3,065 MCC Major Drainage repairs, LTP3 Maintenance / carriageway and footway 1, MCC repairs Bridge assessment / improvement works 8,000 7, Funding Source - - MCC / ERDF MCC / Third Party / ERDF LTP2 Carry over / MCC Main LTP3 Objectives Arndale Bridge, Cross Street MCC ü ü Neighbourhood Highways Services 16,200 MCC ü ü ü LTP2 Carry over / Indicative ITB Integrated transport measures ,000 allocation of 1m in 2014/15 for priority minor transport Traffic Management & Public Realm Schemes 1, MCC ü ü ü Congestion Reduction DfT ü ü TOTAL 108,469 ü ü ü ü ü ü ü 5

6 Oldham Key local challenges and priorities for transport in in the financial years to 2014/15: to improve the condition of the highway network, in particular to reduce the maintenance backlog which has built up on the Borough s roads. This will be undertaken through Oldham s LTP maintenance programme and Highways Investment Programme; to repair failing drystone retaining walls through the Greater Manchester Retaining Wall scheme; to improve the condition of Oldham s street lighting stock by entering into a PFI contract which would enable replacement of 75% of all lighting columns; to tackle the problem of under-strength structures which currently carry weight limits through the bridge maintenance programme; to deliver the transport improvements required to support the changes in pupil travel patterns that will result from Oldham s Building Schools for the Future (BSF) and Academies programme; and to work in partnership with Transport for Greater Manchester to bring Metrolink to Oldham, including the route through Oldham town centre and improved park and ride facilities. Due to the lack of LTP funding available to Oldham for minor works and local safety schemes in the first three years of this LTP, Oldham Council has recognised the challenge in delivering against some priorities. In the early years Oldham Council will concentrate on maintaining the network through investment in maintenance. They will endeavour to incorporate safety measures into maintenance schemes wherever possible and seek funding from other sources such as the Local Sustainable Transport Fund to improve safety and promote the use of cycling, walking and public transport. 6

7 Oldham Programme Major Schemes Oldham local contribution to GM major retaining wall scheme Oldham Council Metrolink contribution 2012/ / / , LTP maintenance block LTP maintenance block Prudential Borrowing Sub Total 3, Minor Schemes LTP Integrated Transport LTP maintenance Block commitments from block 2010/11 LTP Integrated Transport LTP integrated Block programmes transport block Infrastructure to support BSF and Academies Programme* 1,000 1, Funding Source Prudential borrowing / BSF Grant / Academies Grant Sub Total 1,036 1, Maintenance Carriageways and footways** 1,269 1,502 1,365 LTP maintenance 1,287 block Bridges** LTP maintenance 562 block Street lighting** LTP maintenance 244 block Highways Investment Prudential 3,000 3,000 2,500 - Programme Borrowing Sub Total 5,035 5,382 4,722 2,093 TOTAL 9,391 6,632 4,888 2,568 Main LTP3 Objectives ü ü ü The figures in the above table reflect a reduced level of funding for minor works for the years to 2013/14 and demonstrate a short term focus on maintenance. In view of longer term funding uncertainty, the figures shown for the financial years 2012/13 to 2014/15 are currently indicative. * A maximum capital resource of million has been set aside by the Council towards the cost of complying with planning requirements and delivering the necessary transport improvements to support the BSF and Academies programme over the next two to three years. The expenditure profile shown above is an estimate and will be subject to change. ** allocations for capital maintenance are subject to formal approval being obtained in April

8 Rochdale Key local challenges and priorities for transport in in the financial years to 2014/15: to respond to the enhanced pressures of reduced finance and resources, retaining and developing commercial operations / partnerships and delivery of essential local regeneration, all of which influence local contributions to GMLTP3 to deliver modal shift and increase public transport patronage through establishing park and ride sites, thus improving quality of life and air quality in those localities; to deliver Rochdale s contribution to the Greater Manchester retaining walls scheme; to improve the condition of the highway network; to promote the East Lancashire Railway to increase tourism and support regeneration; to address congestion caused by HGVs, other commercial and private vehicles; and to work in partnership with Transport for Greater Manchester and others to deliver Metrolink, including a stop at Kingsway, develop and deliver the new Rochdale Interchange as part of the regeneration of Rochdale Town Centre, deliver improvements to Littleborough rail station and, subject to funding, Castleton and Smithy Bridge. Funding remains a primary concern for Rochdale MBC as the highways programmes proposed to progress within LTP3 will now no longer receive district allocations of the DfT ITB for minor works. This funding stream had previously been identified as essential to support development of the key transport improvements, including road accident prevention; either as match funding or to kick start a financial commitment for the schemes identified. The funding requirements remain subject to further work and confirmation. Rochdale Programme 2012/ / /15 Funding Source Main LTP3 Objectives Bus Infrastructure schemes 1, ,100 PIF* and other Traffic Management Schemes - 2, PIF ü Local Road Schemes PIF ü ü Other schemes (town centre, Roch Valley Way, PIF, DfT and third Littleborough Arches, Drake party contribution ü Street) Structures scheme 1, DfT Grant ü TOTAL 4,340 2,000-1,100 * All budgets are indicative and subject to change. Please refer to Rochdale MBC s Local Area Implementation Plan for additional detail. DfT - ITB/Maintenance or other grant, CO Carry over funding received previous years, PIF Priority Investment Funds (internal RMBC). 8

9 The figures in the above table reflect a reduced level of funding for minor works for the years to 2013/14 and demonstrate a short term focus on maintenance. In view of longer term funding uncertainty, the figures shown for the financial years 2012/13 to 2014/15 are currently indicative. 9

10 Salford Key local challenges and priorities for transport in the financial years to 2014/15: to provide an integrated transport system to support the city s expanding and developing economic and business areas in Central Salford and Salford West; to continue to reduce the rate of road casualties in Salford; to maximize the number of trips made on foot or by cycling; to commence the implementation plan for highway network recovery, so as to help minimise future maintenance costs; and to work in partnership with Transport for Greater Manchester and others, including Network Rail, to deliver improvements to Salford Crescent and Walkden rail stations and, subject to funding, Eccles and Irlam. Salford Programme 2012/ / /15 Funding Source Main LTP3 Objectives Minor Schemes Local Safety Schemes LTP (Maintenance 600 reallocation); Borrowing ü ü ü LTP (Maintenance Schemes to Assist Cycling reallocation); ü ü ü Borrowing Other Minor Works 1, LTP (Maintenance 400 reallocation); Borrowing ü Sub Total 2,555 1,600 1,400 1,200 Maintenance Bridges LTP(Maintenance 800 reallocation); ü ü ü Borrowing Highways Maintenance 3,050 2,000 2,000 2,000 Borrowing ü ü ü Street Lighting 1,916 1,600 1,600 1,600 Borrowing Sub Total 5,501 4,400 4,400 4,400 TOTAL 8,056 6,000 5,800 5,600 These figures have been provided prior to the City Council setting its budget for ; and prior to known outturn figures for expenditure in 2010/11. Consequently, the values supplied may be subject to change during the financial year. The figures in the above table reflect a reduced level of funding for minor works for the years to 2013/14 and demonstrate a short term focus on maintenance. In view of longer term funding uncertainty, the figures shown for the financial years 2012/13 to 2014/15 are currently indicative. 10

11 Stockport Key local challenges and priorities for transport in the financial years to 2014/15: to maintain and improve the transportation assets to enable the networks to be used as efficiently, effectively and safely as possible and to improve resilience to all weather conditions; to manage and maintain the transportation networks to seek to reduce congestion and maximise their efficiency and effectiveness including considering the needs of more sustainable forms of transport, freight and motorised vehicles; to deliver Stockport s contribution to the Greater Manchester Retaining Walls major scheme; to work in partnership with Transport for Greater Manchester and others to deliver improvements to Bramhall, Brinnington, Cheadle Hulme, Marple, Reddish North and Rose Hill Marple rail stations and, subject to funding, Strines; and to continue to develop the detail of the scheme and identify and secure an appropriate funding mechanism for the SEMMMS A6 to Manchester Airport Relief Road. Stockport Programme Schemes/ interventions Year Funding source Objectives 1 2 3** 4** Major Schemes GM Retaining Walls 1,750 DfT Grant ü ü ü Greater SEMMMS Relief Road Manchester ü Transport Fund Minor Schemes Integrated Transport Element 550 LTP3 ü Connect2 250 Match Funding from Sustrans. Maintenance Invest to Save 1,800 1,800 1,800 Prudential Borrowing ü ü ü Drainage improvements Prudential Borrowing ü ü Drainage Hotspots Council Funding ü ü Highway maintenance 1,629 1,609 1,629 1,215 LTP3 ü ü ü Highways winter damage repair 505 DfT Grant ü ü ü Street Lighting LTP3 ü ü ü Highways Structures 1,300 1,250 1, LTP3 TOTAL 8,644 5,299 5,328 2,945 ** Subject to confirmation. The figures in the above table reflect a reduced level of funding for minor works for the years to 2013/14 and demonstrate a short term focus on maintenance. In view of longer term funding uncertainty, the figures shown for the financial years 2012/13 to 2014/15 are currently indicative. 11

12 Tameside Key local challenges and priorities for transport in the financial years to 2014/15: to deliver the A6140 Ashton Northern Bypass Stage 2; to deliver Tameside s contribution to the Greater Manchester Retaining Walls Major Maintenance Scheme in partnership with Stockport, Oldham and Rochdale; to maintain and future proof the Borough highway infrastructure including highways, bridges, street lighting and other associated infrastructure; to reduce the incidence and severity of casualties on the network; and to work in partnership with Transport for Greater Manchester to bring Metrolink to Droylsden (Phase 3a) and Ashton-under-Lyne (Phase 3b), to deliver improvements to Ashton-under-Lyne rail station and, subject to funding, Broadbottom, Flowery Field, Hattersley and Newton-for-Hyde. Tameside Programme 2012/ / /15 Funding Source Main LTP3 Objectives Major Schemes Greater Manchester Retaining Wall 4, DfT s Sub Total 4, Minor Schemes Prudential TMBC Capital Funding - Local Borrowing (Subject Safety Scheme to Council Approval) initiatives LTP Integrated Transport ITB Block Programme Structural maintenance (highways, bridges & street lighting) 2,103 1,930 1,820 1,867 DfT Sub Total 2,468 2,295 2,185 2,342 Maintenance (Revenue) Footways, Drainage, Bollards, Signs, Signals and Loops Tameside Council Minor Works Tameside Council Drainage Tameside Council Street Lighting (Maintenance, Energy, RCCO) 2, Tameside Council Winter Maintenance Tameside Council Highways Tameside Council Management Sub Total 5, TOTA L 11,810 2,295 2,185 2,342 The figures in the above table reflect a reduced level of funding for minor works for the years to 2013/14 and demonstrate a short term focus on maintenance. In view of longer 12

13 term funding uncertainty, the figures shown for the financial years 2012/13 to 2014/15 are currently indicative. The major schemes are noted with appropriate spend profiles. With a Year 1, 33% reduction in DfT Integrated Transport Block (ITB) funding to local authorities and Greater Manchester s commitment to funding major schemes through the Greater Manchester Transport Fund, there is currently no direct funding available for ITB type schemes for any Greater Manchester district. For only, Tameside intend to allocate 365k for Local Safety Scheme initiatives through Prudential Borrowing. The Local Transport Plan (LTP) settlement for to 2014/15 sets the level of funding for highway capital maintenance for and 2012/13, with indicative amounts for the two following years 2013/2014 and 2014/15. Tameside has committed over 5m revenue funding in 2010/11 for investing in ongoing general maintenance on the highway. Whilst funding levels for are still to be determined, the figures give a general indication of ongoing need. 13

14 Trafford Key local challenges and priorities for transport in the financial years to 2014/15: to tackle congestion on main roads and at key junctions; to reduce the number of people killed & injured on Trafford s roads; to improve local air quality by reducing harmful emissions from transport, and minimise wider adverse environmental impacts of the transport network; to improve bus services and increase bus patronage; to make it easier for people to get to key services; to increase levels of walking and cycling; to maintain the highway network; and to work in partnership with Transport for Greater Manchester to increase the capacity and enhance the quality of Metrolink services, to deliver the new Altrincham Interchange and, subject to funding, to improve Hale and Flixton rail stations. Trafford Council has set out a clear vision and a number of challenges relating to transport in its Local Area Implementation Plan. In order to begin to deliver on these challenges in the current constrained funding environment, they have identified a programme of schemes, which can be viewed in the full Local Area Implementation Plan. The following table summarises this programme, and the funding associated with it for the year. In addition, an indication of likely funding allocations for the years 2012/13 to 2014/15 is provided. Funding allocations from a number of sources are yet to be finalised, and therefore it is noted that this is an indicative programme only and may be subject to change at a later date due to changes in funding availability or as a result of the further development of the listed schemes. 14

15 Trafford Programme Major Schemes 2012/ / /15 Altrincham Interchange Sub Total Minor Schemes Bus performance and congestion A56 Chester Rd/Edge Lane junction; A560 Stockport Road, Timperley; targeted bus stop accessibility Funding Source Internal Trafford Council budget Trafford ITB (Maintenance Reallocation) Main LTP3 Objectives ü ü ü Active Travel Bridgewater Way Phase; Completion of Old Trafford Cycle Link; safer walking and cycling routes to schools; dropped crossing upgrades; pedestrian facilities at the A560/Wellington Road junction; Feasibility and design - the Bridgewater Way and Manchester City centre; Cycle parking improvement programme; Bikeability Cycle training for all Year 6 school children Car parking Parking control schemes; Provision of new Pay and Display machines in Council car parks Road Safety/Casualty Reduction A56 Gorse Hill safety zone; Wharfside Way/John Gilbert Way junction; VAS review and upgrades; Design work for other schemes associated with casualty hotspots To Be Allocated Trafford ITB (Maintenance Reallocation), DfT Bikeability, S106, Heritage Lottery, Bridgewater Canal Trust Trafford ITB (Maintenance Reallocation) and other internal Trafford budgets Trafford ITB (Maintenance Reallocation) The figures in the above table reflect a reduced level of funding for minor works for the years to 2013/14 and demonstrate a short term focus on maintenance. In view of longer term funding uncertainty, the figures shown for the financial years 2012/13 to 2014/15 are currently indicative. ü ü ü ü ü Sub Total 1, Maintenance A56 corridor and the classified B and C roads into Trafford Park and the south of the Borough; Sections of the urban unclassified roads most in need of maintenance 2,370 2,288 2,149 2,054 Maintenance Block Sub Total 2,370 2,288 2,149 2,054 TOTAL 4,025 2,788 2,149 2,504 15

16 Wigan Key local challenges and priorities for transport in the financial years to 2014/15: to increase network efficiencies to tackle the cost of deprivation and to sustain economic activity; to address congestion, cited as the major issue for Wigan Borough by residents and businesses; to improve accessibility in order to generate economic activity; to maintain the highway network and to work in partnership with Transport for Greater Manchester and others to deliver the Leigh-Salford-Manchester busway, improvements to Wigan North Western rail station and, subject to funding, Gathurst, Ince, Pemberton and Wigan Wallgate rail stations. Wigan Programme 2012/ / /15 Funding Source Main LTP3 Objectives Minor Schemes Network Management Wigan Council 400 Revenue ü ü ü Public Rights of Way Wigan Council 140 Revenue Street Lighting - Replacement Highways Block of columns Maintenance Street Lighting - Replacement Wigan Council of existing units Capital Congestion Relief Through Demand Management ITB ü ü Deliver the Road Safety Strategy for the Borough to reduce the incidences of casualties on the network ITB Sub Total 1,630 1, ,270 Maintenance Highways Maintenance - Wigan Council 1,200 1,100 1,000 1,000 Safety Revenue ü ü ü Highways Maintenance - Annual Programme Including Structured 2,615 2,588 2,542 Highways 2,501 Maintenance Block / Wigan Council ü ü ü Sub Total 3,815 3,688 3,542 3,501 TOTAL 5,445 5,258 4,212 4,771 The figures in the above table reflect a reduced level of funding for minor works for the years to 2013/14 and demonstrate a short term focus on maintenance. In view of longer term funding uncertainty, the figures shown for the financial years 2012/13 to 2014/15 are currently indicative. 16

17 Transport for Greater Manchester (Capital) Key local challenges for transport and priorities in the financial years to 2014/15: to deliver the projects and programmes, for which funding has been secured, within the Greater Manchester Transport Fund; to identify and/or confirm funding for the projects and programmes within the Greater Manchester Transport Fund for which funding has not yet been secured; and to develop and deliver the other committed capital schemes Transport for Greater Manchester Capital Programme Prior Years 2012/ /14 Future Total Greater Manchester Transport Fund* 167, , , , ,412 1,052,114 Other Metrolink Capital Programmes Metrolink Phase 3A 374, ,070 34, ,012 Metrolink SEP/SIP 131,379 9,681 2,415 3, ,167 Sub Total 505, ,751 36,915 3, ,179 Other Committed Capital Schemes Transport Infrastructure Fund - 5, ,500 Victoria Station Roof - 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 4,000 Wythenshawe Interchange , ,470 Rochdale Interchange 3, ,310 2,649-11,500 Traffic Signals - - 3,608 3,297-6,905 SEMMMS Minor - 1, ,085 Smart Ticketing 1,682 1,206 4,569 5,377 3,565 16,400 Green Bus 4,833 12, ,379 Sub Total 10,184 22,157 14,987 16,323 4,587 68,239 Total Capital 683, , , , ,999 1,842,532 *Please note that the schemes incorporated within the Greater Manchester Transport Fund are detailed in Section 10.2 of the LTP3 Core Strategy document. 17

18 Transport for Greater Manchester (Revenue) Key local challenges for transport and priorities in the financial years to 2014/15: to maintain an effective and accessible public transport network in the context of prevailing budgetary constraints. Transport for Greater Manchester Revenue Programme ' million Revenue Expenditure Concessionary Support 66.4 Supported Bus Services 31.5 Rail 78.3 Accessible Transport 6.1 Passenger Services, Facilities & Support 34.5 Financing 56.9 Total Expenditure Revenue Funding Levy Base Levy GMTF Funding 10.1 National Concessionary Travel Scheme 11.1 Rebased Levy Special Rail Grant 78.3 Metrolink net revenues and third party contributions 10.8 Rural Bus Subsidy Grant - Total Grant 89.1 Total Revenue

19 Network Rail The table below represents an overview of Network Rail s planned and forecast expenditure for the 2011/2012 to 2014/1/2015 ing Review Period. This expenditure is broken down into the following key areas: Major Schemes Minor Schemes Maintenance Renewals Network Rail Programme Major Schemes 2012/ / /15 Northern Urban Centres* 1,000 10,000 20,000 TBC Network Rail Liverpool-Leeds linespeed improvements 19,500 14,000 TBC Network Rail North West Electrification ,000 Network Rail Sub Total 20,500 10,000 34, ,000 Minor Schemes *Northern Urban Centres Scheme (between 2011 and 2015) covers: GM train maintenance facilities Salford Crescent station rebuild GM infrastructure capacity improvements at Guide Bridge and Stalybridge Cheadle Hulme station 3, DfT Access for All ü ü Littleborough station 1, DfT Access for All ü ü Manchester Oxford Road station - 2, DfT Access for All ü ü Manchester Victoria 1, NSIP / MCC / - TFGM ü ü Sub Total 6,000 2, Maintenance and Renewals Renewals (Network Rail national) 252, , ,000 TBC Sub Total 252, , ,000 - TOTAL 278, , , ,000 Funding Source Main ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü 19

20 Highways Agency The table below represents an overview of the Highway Agency s planned and forecast expenditure for the 2011/2012 to 2014/2015 ing Review Period. This expenditure is broken down into the following key areas: Major Schemes Minor Schemes Renewals Highways Agency Programme Structures capital 3,100 HA TOTA 255,900 L *Subject to completing statutory processes Main LTP3 Objectives Funding Source 2012/ / /15 Major Schemes* M60 J15-12 Lane Gain Scheme 46,000 HA M60 J8-12 Managed Motorway 87,000 HA M60 J18-20 Managed Motorway 93,000 HA Minor schemes** Local Network Management Schemes 6,600 HA Renewals ** Roads capital 20,200 HA **Preliminary bid as of January These figures may be subject to change and depend upon final settlement decisions 20