HANNIBAL Project High Altitude Network for the Needs of Integrated Border-Crossing Applications and Links

Transcription

1 Introduction HANNIBAL Project High Altitude Network for the Needs of Integrated Border-Crossing Applications and Links Presentation prepared by Andrew Winder and Steve Morello ISIS - traffic and transportation engineering Lyon, France HANNIBAL: TTCM8 Results Presentation, 9th March Slide 1

2 Overview of HANNIBAL Franco-Italian traffic management project involving the demonstration of telematics applications Objectives included: Provision of a homogenous level of user information along the Paris - Lyon - Milan - Trieste corridor To demonstrate cross-border information exchange using DATEX-Net HANNIBAL: TTCM8 Results Presentation, 9th March Slide 2

3 Geographic Coverage A: Corridor Demonstration N Paris A4 Troyes A5 A6 -E15 A31 E60 Mulhouse A36-E60 Dijon FRANCE Beaune A6 E15 Geneva Besançon Bern Bâle Zurich SWITZERLAND B: Alps Crossing Demonstration Mâcon Lyon Valence A46 A40-E21 A42 Annecy Mont -Blanc tunnel A43-E70 Chambéry A43 0 Fréjus tunnel A41 E712 Grenoble N91 Montgenevre pass A5 Aoste E25 E70 Torino Sestriere Milano A4 ITALY Brescia Veron a A4 E70 Padova Mestre A4-E55 a Venezia Trieste A7 E15 Montpellier A7 E714 A51 E712 Aix Marseille A8-E80 C: Sestriere Demonstration HANNIBAL: TTCM8 Results Presentation, 9th March Slide 3

4 Data Exchange DATEX-Net in operation between: France Italy CRICR de Lyon (regional traffic control centre for Rhône-Alpes/Auvergne) SAPRR (Paris-Rhin-Rhône motorway company) Other motorway operators in France communicate by fax via the CRICR ASTM (Turin-Milan motorway) SITAF (Italian side of Fréjus Tunnel and Bardonecchia- Turin motorway) Società Autostrade (Milan- Brescia motorway) AINE (Brescia-Padova motorway) HANNIBAL: TTCM8 Results Presentation, 9th March Slide 4

5 HANNIBAL - Evaluation Roadside Interview Surveys of Users of the Mont-Blanc and Fréjus Tunnels (summer 1998) - the key results of these surveys are presented here Semi-directive interviews with managers and operators (on-going) Analysis of messages sent and received during the demonstration period (1 Dec Jan 1999) HANNIBAL: TTCM8 Results Presentation, 9th March Slide 5

6 User Surveys: Purpose to determine user behaviour to determine user perceptions and attitudes to evaluate the impact of the first HANNIBAL demonstration (summer 1998) HANNIBAL: TTCM8 Results Presentation, 9th March Slide 6

7 Methodology Where? Mont-Blanc Fréjus Cluses Toll Plaza, on the A40 (F I) Tunnel entrance, Courmayeur (I F) Tunnel entrance, Modane (F I) Tunnel entrance, Bardonecchia (I F) When? 4 days at each site: 3 July (Friday) 18 July (Saturday) 12 August (Wednesday) 28 August (Friday) From to hours on each day HANNIBAL: TTCM8 Results Presentation, 9th March Slide 7

8 Data Collected A total of interviews were carried out (1 223 for Mont-Blanc and for Fréjus) Questions covered the following: Origin & destination Pre-trip information obtained Information received during the journey and incidents met Reaction to information received and to project in general Nationality Trip frequency, journey purpose, age, sex and occupation (light vehicles only) Type of work and annual km s travelled (HGV s only) HANNIBAL: TTCM8 Results Presentation, 9th March Slide 8

9 Commentary The number of interviews carried out was considerably greater than was anticipated The random selection method has resulted in a high level of statistical significance HANNIBAL: TTCM8 Results Presentation, 9th March Slide 9

10 Split between light vehicles (cars) and Heavy Goods Vehicles (HGVs) France Italy Mont Blanc 528 cars (77%) 158 HGVs (23%)* * 0 on 18 July (Saturday) Italy France Mont Blanc 328 cars (61%) 209 HGVs (39%) Fréjus 535 cars (71%) 215 HGVs (29%) Fréjus 330 cars (63%) 197 HGVs (37%) HANNIBAL: TTCM8 Results Presentation, 9th March Slide 10

11 Trip-ends: French side (light vehicles) Origins (France Italy) Destinations (Italy France) Mont- Fréjus Blanc Mont- Fréjus Blanc Rhône-Alpes 36% 60% 54% 66% (Lyon, Grenoble, Savoie) Geneva 19% 6% 5% 0% Rhône-Alpes & Geneva 55% 66% 59% 66% Other parts of France 42% 33% 36% 31% Elsewhere (Benelux, UK, etc) 3% 1% 5% 3% TOTAL 100% 100% 100% 100% HANNIBAL: TTCM8 Results Presentation, 9th March Slide 11

12 Trip-ends: French side (HGVs) Origins (France Italy) Destinations (Italy France) Mont- Fréjus Blanc Mont- Fréjus Blanc Rhône-Alpes 36% 62% 23% 44% (Lyon, Grenoble, Savoie) Geneva 0% 1% 1% 1% Rhône-Alpes & Geneva 36% 63% 24% 45% Other parts of France 56% 35% 41% 24% Elsewhere (Benelux, UK, etc) 8% 3% 36% 32% TOTAL 100% 100% 100% 100% HANNIBAL: TTCM8 Results Presentation, 9th March Slide 12

13 Trip-ends: Italian side (light vehicles) Origins (Italy France) Mont- Fréjus Blanc Destinations (France Italy) Mont- Fréjus Blanc Vallè d'aosta 34% 1% 15% 5% Piemonte (Torino) 16% 55% 18% 33% Lombardia (Milano) 19% 8% 21% 14% North-West Italy 68% 63% 54% 51% Other parts of Italy 31% 35% 45% 48% Elsewhere (Slovenia, Croatia, 1% 2% 1% 1% Greece, Turkey, etc) TOTAL 100% 100% 100% 100% HANNIBAL: TTCM8 Results Presentation, 9th March Slide 13

14 Trip-ends: Italian side (HGVs) Origins (Italy France) Mont- Fréjus Blanc Destinations (France Italy) Mont- Fréjus Blanc Vallè d'aosta 17% 0% 10% 2% Piemonte (Torino) 16% 39% 10% 55% Lombardia (Milano) 26% 26% 51% 23% North-West Italy 59% 65% 72% 80% Other parts of Italy 41% 33% 26% 19% Elsewhere (Slovenia, Croatia, 1% 2% 2% 1% Greece, Turkey, etc) TOTAL 100% 100% 100% 100% HANNIBAL: TTCM8 Results Presentation, 9th March Slide 14

15 Pre-Journey Information (1) 26% of users got information on road and traffic conditions before starting their journey By vehicle type (both tunnels): 24% of light vehicles; 30% of HGVs By tunnel/direction (light vehicles): 26% for France Italy via Mont-Blanc 16% for Italy France via Mont-Blanc 23% for France Italy via Fréjus 29% for Italy France via Fréjus HANNIBAL: TTCM8 Results Presentation, 9th March Slide 15

16 Pre-Journey Information (2) Information sources used French side (F I) Italian side (I F) No. of respondents No. of respondents Radio 238 (71%) 237 (77%) Television 83 (25%) 68 (22%) Newspaper 17 (5%) 16 (5%) Minitel 28 (8%) 4 (1%) Internet 10 (3%) 3 (1%) Other 33 (10%) 19 (6%) Note: Percentages are of the total number of respondents who got information before their journey. In each case, they add up to more than 100% as some respondents used more than one information source. HANNIBAL: TTCM8 Results Presentation, 9th March Slide 16

17 Incidents en route Some 30% of respondents stated that they met an incident during their journey 38% of incidents met were roadworks 32% for the Mont-Blanc route and 44% for Fréjus 22% were queuing or stationary traffic 15% were accidents 11% were precipitation HANNIBAL: TTCM8 Results Presentation, 9th March Slide 17

18 Information Received on Incidents Overall, 47% of respondents who met an incident on their journey received information on it (by radio, VMS, etc) Percentages for each route/direction are: Total By VMS By radio Mont-Blanc (French side) 60% 45% 19% Mont-Blanc (Italian side) 35% 0% 29% Fréjus (French side) 36% 25% 15% Fréjus (Italian side) 56% 35% 18% HANNIBAL: TTCM8 Results Presentation, 9th March Slide 18

19 User Comments (1) Question: "The aim of the traffic management project called HANNIBAL is to supply homogeneous information on the Paris - Lyon - Trieste corridor. As a user, what do you think about it?" (spontaneous answer) Overall responses: Don't know the project/no comment 40.4% Positive comment (good, useful, etc) 57.2% Negative comment (not necessary, etc) 0.6% Other comments 5.2% Note: percentages add up to 103.4% as some respondents made more than one comment HANNIBAL: TTCM8 Results Presentation, 9th March Slide 19

20 User Comments (2) Routes with the highest percentages of positive comments: Mont-Blanc (French side) Fréjus (Italian side) Possible explanations are: Differences in radio coverage (e.g. a single frequency on FM from Paris and Northern France to Mont-Blanc) SAPRR provision of radio information about HANNIBAL during the survey days (in French and English) Differences in VMS provision The incomplete state of the motorways in the Maurienne valley (French side of Fréjus) and in the Aosta valley (Italian side of Mont-Blanc) HANNIBAL: TTCM8 Results Presentation, 9th March Slide 20

21 User Profile: Journey Purpose and Frequency (light vehicles only) Journey purpose: Leisure (e.g. holidays) 75% Business 15% Commuting 5% Visiting family/friends 4% Other (e.g. medical treatment) 1% Journey frequency: Several times a year 34% Approximately once a year 36% First time 30% HANNIBAL: TTCM8 Results Presentation, 9th March Slide 21

22 User Profile: Nationality Light vehicles HGVs Mont-Blanc Fréjus Mont-Blanc* Fréjus French 45.9% 57.2% 46.4% 50.4% Italian 40.3% 34.5% 34.0% 37.1% Benelux 1.6% 1.6% 14.4% 5.3% UK/Irish 2.8% 1.8% 4.3% 4.3% Other EU 1.2% 1.2% 0.5% 2.2% Swiss 4.4% 1.5% 0.0% 0.0% E.European/ 1.4% 1.6% 0.0% 0.7% Turkish Other 2.5% 0.6% 0.5% 0.0% * Note: Mont-Blanc HGV data was collected for the Italy to France direction only HANNIBAL: TTCM8 Results Presentation, 9th March Slide 22

23 Conclusions (User Surveys) Where there were incidents, 47% of users were informed about them (rising to over 50% on the French side of Mont-Blanc and the Italian side of Fréjus) Overall response to the project was favourable, with a majority of comments being positive on the French side of Mont- Blanc and both sides of Fréjus HANNIBAL: TTCM8 Results Presentation, 9th March Slide 23

24 Conclusions (Other Aspects) Data Exchange: in operation (first time there has been cross-border data exchange using DATEX-Net) continuing beyond the demonstration period Surveys of Operators and Traffic Managers: initial analysis has shown a positive response, i.e. the system is generally felt to be relevant, works well in practice, improves information provision and has led to closer co-operation between motorway companies HANNIBAL: TTCM8 Results Presentation, 9th March Slide 24

25 HANNIBAL END ISIS - traffic and transportation engineering Lyon, France HANNIBAL: TTCM8 Results Presentation, 9th March Slide 25