Calendar Year 2015 Oklahoma TravelsAmerica Visitor Profile Report Presentation. Calendar Year 2015 Oklahoma TravelsAmerica Visitor Profile Report

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "Calendar Year 2015 Oklahoma TravelsAmerica Visitor Profile Report Presentation. Calendar Year 2015 Oklahoma TravelsAmerica Visitor Profile Report"

Everett Parker
5 years ago
Views:

1 TravelsAmerica Visitor Profile Report Presentation

2 Our time together TNS Your Profile What does it all mean?

3 TNS One of the largest travel research practices in the U.S World s largest custom marketing research firm Company owned offices in over 100 countries Over 14,000 employees

4 About WPP TNS 2010

5 Your Profile

6 TravelsAmerica: We speak to travelers lots of them 14,000 households a month that s 168,000 American households each year and over 1 million in the last 6 years We are the official research vendor of record to the

7 Tourism = Important to Oklahoma Visitors vs. Population Person-Trips to State (000) Population (000) 105,767 20,297 14,705 3,911 2,912 27,469 14,908 2,978 Oklahoma Kansas Texas Arkansas Ratio:

8 Neighboring Texas dominates Oklahoma s out-of-state visitor source markets Plus, a third (5 of 14) of the top source DMAs are in Texas. Source of Visitors: Top States Base: Visited Oklahoma % of Visitors Residing in... (CY 2015) Source of Visitors: Top DMAs Base: Visited Oklahoma % of Visitors Residing in... (CY 2015) Oklahoma Texas Kansas Arkansas Missouri California Florida Illinois Iowa New York Colorado Minnesota New Mexico Virginia 6% 6% 5% 0% 0% 0% 3 28% CY 2015 CY % 4 Panel: State/DMA residence of those who visited Oklahoma (Household Level) Dallas-Ft. Worth Oklahoma City Tulsa Ft. Smith-Fayetteville-Springdale- Wichita-Hutchinson Plus Wichita Falls & Lawton Houston Sherman-Ada Kansas City Shreveport Springfield MO Austin Little Rock/Pine Bluff Waco-Temple-Bryan 20% 18% 20% 2 10% 1

9 Visitors most commonly use on their own experience to plan an Oklahoma trip Visitors also rely on word-of-mouth, either directly or via social/commercial networking; many take advantage of search engines as well. Information Sources to Plan a Trip Ranked by All Sources (8%+) 60% 66% 60% % 3 39% 25% 2 27% 19% 39% 35% 38% % 18% 15% % 9% 1 8% 10% 9% 5% 5% 7% 6% 7% 9% 3 26% 27% 2 NET OFFLINE Own Experience Friends/ Relatives NET ONLINE (Incl Social Networking) Search Engines (Google etc.) Social/ Commercial Networking Sources Travel provider Online full website (airline, service travel hotel, rental car, website cruise, tour) (Expedia, Travelocity, etc.) Destination Website NO PLANS MADE All Travelers - CY 2015 OK Visitors - CY 2014 OK Visitors - CY 2015 OK LS Overnight (O/N) Visitors - CY 2015 Q4j. What sources did you use in planning your trip to... (State Level demo wtd) Note: Social/Comm l Network = Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, etc. LS = Leisure O/N = Overnight

10 Day-trippers and locals (OK residents) spend less time planning and deciding on an Oklahoma trip The shorter time horizon matches expectations since day-trippers and locals have fewer travel considerations (such as lodging, number of meals, transportation logistics) With most visitors living in Oklahoma or a neighboring state, the trip decision occurs more spontaneously than for US travelers overall. Trip Planning (Time Before Visit) All US Travelers (All Trips) CY 2015 OK Visitors Total CY 2013 OK Visitors Total CY 2014 OK Visitors Total CY 2015 OK Visitors Leisure O/N* CY 2015 OK Visitors Leisure Day Trip CY 2015 OK In-State Visitors CY 2015 OK Out-of- State Visitors CY 2015 Considered Within Two Weeks 30% 37% 37% 36% 28% % 2 4 Weeks Months Months Decided Within Two Weeks 39% 45% 46% 45% 37% % 2 4 Weeks Months Months Q4i. Please indicate how far in advance you considered traveling to... // Decided to visit... (State Level-demo wtd) *O/N = Overnight 24

11 Oklahoma and nearby competitors travel parties look very similar Trip Characteristics (Trip Level) All US Travelers CY 2015 Visit OK Visit KS Visit TX Visit AR AVERAGE # IN TRAVEL PARTY % Travel in Pairs 40% % 39% % Traveling with Children Avg. # of Children on Trip Inc Avg. # of Children on Trip Exc Q3a: Please indicate number of travel party members (including yourself) under 18 and 18+. (Trip Level-demo wtd)

12 Of competitors, more TX visitors travel for business and fly; OK visitors take shorter trips Trip Choices (Trip Level) PRIMARY TRIP PURPOSE All US Travelers CY 2015 Visit OK Visit KS Visit TX Visit AR NET Leisure 79% 76% 78% 7 7 Visit Friends/Relatives Entertainment/Sightsee Outdoor Recreation Business Personal Business/Other PRIMARY MODE % Own Auto/Truck % 78% % Air Travel Lodging (State Level) All US Trips CY 2015 Visit OK Visit KS Visit TX Visit AR AVG # NIGHTS (if any) Private Home Hotel/Motel Other Q1b: Which was the primary purpose of trip? Q2b: Which was the primary mode of transportation? (Trip Level demo wtd) Q4f: Please specify the number of nights stayed at each listed accommodation. (State Level demo wtd) 29

13 Oklahoma travelers primarily visit friends/relatives Compared to other US travelers, a much larger share of travelers come for casinos and gaming while fewer shop, enjoy fine dining, or visit beaches. CY 2015 % Activities Participated/Attractions Ranked by 2015 Oklahoma Visitors (Activities with < for Oklahoma not shown) Visiting relatives Casino/ Gaming Shopping Visiting friends Fine dining Museums 26% 28% 3 7% 20% % 17% 15% % 7% 8% Rural sightseeing Historic sites/ Churches Urban sightseeing State park/monuments/ Recreation areas Nightclubs/ Dancing Family reunion 10% 7% 7% 8% 6% 6% 9% 5% 6% 7% 5% 5% 5% 5% Wildlife viewing Art Galleries Zoos/ Aquariums/ Aviaries Sports events (Non- Pro) Spectator Spa/health club Fishing Beaches None of the above 5% 5% 1 CY 2015 All Travelers CY 2015 OK Visitors CY 2015 OK Leisure Q4h. When you visited (state) during trip/ month, please check all of the following activities did/attractions visited. (State Level-demo wtd) 19% 2 15%

14 Out-of-staters more likely opt for touristy choices Especially gaming, dining, museums, urban sightseeing, clubs/dancing; they also add history and outdoor pursuits (fishing, National parks). In-staters more often visit relatives, go to state parks, and watch their local sports teams. Activities Participated/Attractions Visited by Leisure Visitors % Participated/Visited Ranked by 2014 Oklahoma Out-of-State Visitors Casino/ Gaming 8% 3 Family reunion 5% Camping Visiting relatives Shopping Visiting friends 18% 16% 16% % Wildlife viewing Zoos/ Aquariums/ Aviaries State park/monuments/ Recreation areas 5% 6% National park/monuments/ Recreation areas Local/folk arts/crafts CY 2015 OK Ls Out-of-State CY 2015 OK Ls In-State Note: Ls=Leisure Fine dining 7% 15% Art Galleries Native American ruins/rock art Museums Rural sightseeing Urban sightseeing Historic sites/ Churches Nightclubs/ Dancing 10% 8% 7% 7% 7% 5% 6% Spa/health club Fishing Old homes/ Mansions Musical performance/show Sports events - Youth/ Amateur/ Collegiate/ Other (spectator) Gardens Other nature (photography, rockhound, etc) Motor boat/jet ski None of the above 1 18% Q4h. When you visited (state) during trip/ month, please check all of the following activities did/attractions visited. (State Level-demo wtd) 35

15 Want to be a traveler, not a tourist 79 % Try to go to places off the beaten path 64 % Kantar Futures 2016 Travel Survey 15

16 Travel and vacations are all about Adventure and trying new things 87 % Relaxing and unwinding 91 % Kantar Futures 2016 Travel Survey 16

17 Prefer spending on experiences that enrich my life, like travel and vacations Travel Perceptions by Income Under $50K $50-99K $100K+ 9 89% % 81 % Prefer spending on experiences that enrich my life Travel is a luxury worth spending money on Kantar Futures 2016 Travel Survey 17

18 Kantar Futures 2016 Travel Survey 18

19 75% I would welcome more novelty and change in my life 7 65% 58% 55% U.S. Yankelovich MONITOR Surveys

20 Competitive Environment

21 Out-of-staters visit a broader variety of destinations Out-of-state visitors more likely visit areas beyond Oklahoma s border states than in-state travelers. Other Areas Visited by Oklahoma Visitors in Past 3 Years (Key Competitors) Ranked by Past Three Years Total Top States Base: Visited Oklahoma (Household Level) Top Cities Base: Visited Oklahoma (Household Level) Texas Arkansas Missouri Kansas Florida Colorado California Louisiana Illinois Arizona Tennessee New Mexico 29% 3 27% 29% 3 28% 2 25% % 26% 2 20% 2 20% % % 1 20% 16% 1 17% 15% 1 17% 15% 1 16% 47% 49% 46% Past 3 Years P3Y - In-State P3Y - Out-of-State Dallas/Ft. Worth Denver Area San Antonio Branson, MO Houston St. Louis Kansas City, MO Las Vegas Chicago Orlando Area 16% 16% 16% 15% 1 18% 15% 18% 1 15% 1 16% 1 15% % 1 7% 15% 1 7% 1 1 8% 1 36% 38% 3 Q7a: Please indicate US states visited for leisure in past three years. Q8a: US cities visited past three years.

22 Oklahoma satisfies visitors better than Kansas or Arkansas However, Texas visitors are the most satisfied among visitors to these four states Only a marginal difference in praise exists between in-staters and out-of-staters. Satisfaction: Extremely/Very Satisfied with Visit to State CY 2014 CY % 89% % 8 86% 85% 87% 8 88% 8 OK OK In-State OK Out-of- State KS TX AR OK OK In-State OK Out-of- State KS TX AR Q4l: Using a scale of 1-5 (5=extremely satisfied), please indicate satisfaction with (State Level-demo wtd.)

23 Export/Import

24 Oklahoma s imports move above exports Balance of Trade : Oklahoma residents who visit other states spend more ($581) than non-oklahomans do when they visit Oklahoma ($486), contributing to the rise in imports vs. exports However, adding Oklahoma residents spending inside the state ( domestic spending) still keeps total tourism dollars spent in Oklahoma above the total spent by Oklahoma residents elsewhere. CY % 4 1 CY % 4 19% CY % 4 20% Import Export Domestic Import represents $ leaving OK Export represents $ coming into OK Domestic represents $ staying in OK Note: Spending that occurs outside the state by non-residents is not included in the chart.

25 Connected Life

26 Travel and baby care lead in engaging consumers Willingness of category users to engage with brands % Travel Baby care Personal care Automotive Technology Financial services Household care Personal hygiene Alcoholic drinks Food and drink Tobacco Source: TNS Connected Life

27 Oklahoma visitors look similar to US travelers Heavy usage of both digital and social channels explodes among younger travelers Oklahoma visitors just slightly exceed other US travelers on using technology (fewer functionals). USA Total 30% 17% 20% 3 US Travelers 26% 20% 16% 39% US < % 1 55% US % 20% 17% 25% OK Visitors % 39% OK <45 10% 19% 16% 55% OK % 27% Functional Observer Connector Leader Source: US Digital Life General Report

28 We can now activate attitudinal mindset through DMPs and look-alike models Internet behavior Look-alike model Ad Ad Ad Seed audience for model obtained through syndicated or custom survey/social query Purchase behavior Ad

29 Using Oklahoma City travelers as an example You take the known travelers who traveled to OKC from TNS TravelsAmerica data. Blow up these travelers to 5 million potential travelers. Focus your efforts only to the 5 million potential travelers. The sales lifts we are seeing are in the 20% range. 19

30 American Express Travel, Future Travel Trends 30

31 What does it all mean? 5 to 1 Close in shorter window Explore versus tour Newness Demos versus digital

The Economic Impact of Tourism in Missouri. Fiscal Year 2016 Summary December 2016

The Economic Impact of Tourism in Missouri Fiscal Year 2016 Summary December 2016 Introduction and definitions This study measures the economic impact of tourism in Missouri in FY2016. Visitors included