CO 2. REPORT BUSINESS TRAVEL FOR:... mascontour GmbH REPORTING PERIOD:

Transcription

1 REPORT BUSINESS TRAVEL FOR:... mascontour GmbH REPORTING PERIOD: This report covers the following travel activity types: FLIGHT CAR RAIL HOTEL The calculations in this report are compliant with the following standards: Audited by:

2 TABLE OF CONTENTS EMISSIONS SUMMARY... 3 FLIGHT... 5 CAR... 4 RAIL... 9 HOTEL... 4 OFFSETTING EMISSIONS WITH ATMOSFAIR... 7 ANNEXES... 8 VDR STANDARD -REPORTING BUSINESS TRAVEL... 9 OTHER CALCULATION METHODS... 3 GLOSSARY... 3 Report Business Travel for: mascontour GmbH Reporting period: P.

3 Flight 73 Car Rail Hotel 4 Flight 76 Car 3 Rail 4 Flight 4.7 Car.57 Rail.7 Hotel 3.7 SUMMARY PASSENGERS (PAX) TOTAL: DISTANCE TOTAL [, KM]: EMISSIONS TOTAL [TONS]: Flight 73 Rail 4 Car 3 Hotel 3.7 Rail.7 Car.57 Hotel 4 Car Rail Flight 76 Flight 4.7 emissions for category FLIGHT include RFI.7 addition. Report Business Travel for: mascontour GmbH Reporting period: P.3

4 SUMMARY FLIGHT CAR RAIL HOTEL Pax [total] Pax [% of total] Distance [, km] Distance [% of total] emissions [tons] emissions [% of total] TOTAL Category FLIGHT includes RFI.7 addition. Report Business Travel for: mascontour GmbH Reporting period: P.4

5 FLIGHT SUMMARY... 6 TOP CITY PAIRS... 7 PER SEAT CLASS... 8 PER DISTANCE CLASS... 9 SYNOPSIS OF DIFFERENT METHODS... FUEL PER PKM... REDUCTION POTENTIAL... ATMOSFAIR AIRLINE REPORTING... 3 Report Business Travel for: mascontour GmbH Reporting period: P.5

6 FLIGHT Summary TRAVEL Amount Unit Kilometres, km Miles 9, miles Segments City Pairs 4 3 Average segment distance in km,48 km 3 Average segment distance in miles,497 miles EMISSIONS Amount Unit According to VDR 4.9 tons CO per segment, average. tons CO per passenger kilometre, average 84.5 g per passenger mile, average 36 g According to other methods GRI / GHG Protocol 6. tons CO DEFRA 5.6 tons CO ICAO 4.3 tons CO VFU 9.8 tons CO FUEL Amount Unit Fuel consumption total 4.7 tons fuel Fuel consumptions in altitudes > 9 km 4.9 tons fuel Fuel share in altitudes > 9 km 86.9 % Average fuel consumption (per pkm 4 ) 3.8 litres GLOBAL WARMING IMPACT 5 Amount Unit According to VDR in altitudes < 9 km.94 tons CO in altitudes > 9 km.9 tons CO + RFI 7.8 tons CO + RFI tons CO + RFI tons CO American miles One person, one way, from origin to destination 3 Total distance of all segments divided by number of segments 4 Product of number of passengers and kilometres travelled 5 For further information on other methods and global warming impact see glossary. Report Business Travel for: mascontour GmbH Reporting period: P.6

7 FLIGHT Top city pairs by segments and CO emissions Origin Destination Segments Segments % of total Flight segment length [km] Flight segment length [miles] Total distance [km] Total distance [miles] Cruise altitude [m] emissions [tons ] emissions + RFI.7 [tons ] TOP CITY PAIRS SORTED BY SEGMENTS FRA TXL ,77 3,587, ADD LLW 3.7,688,67 6,88 6,76, ADD FRA 9.3 5,445 3,384 49,5 3,457 3, BKK VTE ,8,385, LPQ VTE , ,5...3 BEG TXL 3 4., ,97,49, TXL VIE ,788,, MUC TXL , , BKK MUC.7 8,95 5,534 7,89,68, BKK FRA.7 9,5 5,658 8,9,37 3, Other ,5 9, TOP CITY PAIRS SORTED BY EMISSIONS ADD FRA 9.3 5,445 3,384 49,5 3,457 3, ADD LLW 3.7,688,67 6,88 6,76, BKK MUC.7 8,95 5,534 7,89,68, BKK FRA.7 9,5 5,658 8,9,37 3, CDG MEX.7 9,38 5,79 8,636,58, AUH BEG.7 3,97,44 7,854 4,88, AUH SEZ.7 3,333,7 6,666 4,43, ADD VIE.4 4,897 3,44 4,897 3,44, FRA TXL ,77 3,587, BEG TXL 3 4., ,97,49, Other ,753, RFI.7 % of total One person, one way, from origin to destination Report Business Travel for: mascontour GmbH Reporting period: P.7

8 Economy: 73 [%] Economy: 4.7t [%] FLIGHT Seat class compared by segments and emissions SEGMENTS PER SEAT CLASS: EMISSIONS PER SEAT CLASS [ + RFI.7): Economy: 73 [%] Economy: 4.7t [%] One person, one way, from origin to destination Report Business Travel for: mascontour GmbH Reporting period: P.8

9 Short: 9 [6.%] Medium: 4 [3.9%] Long: 3 [4.%] Short:.45 t [3.6%] Medium: 3.87 t [9.5%] Long: 35.4 t [86.9%] FLIGHT Distance class compared by segments and emissions SEGMENTS PER DISTANCE CLASS: EMISSIONS 3 PER DISTANCE CLASS [ + RFI.7]: Short:.45 t [3.6%] Short: 9 [6.%] Medium: 3.87 t [9.5%] Long: 3 [4.%] Medium: 4 [3.9%] Long: 35.4 t [86.9%] Short: < 5 km, < 3 miles; Medium: 5 km - 6km, 3 - miles; Long: > 6 km, > miles One person, one way, from origin to destination 3 Report Business Travel for: mascontour GmbH Reporting period: P.9

10 FLIGHT Synopsis of different CO calculation methods Short Range [< 5 km] [< 3 miles] Medium Range [5 -,6 km] [3 -, miles] Long Range [>,6 km] [>, miles] Segments Total distance in kilometres [, km] Total distance in miles [, miles] 5 93 EMISSIONS ACCORDING TO VDR STANDARD 3 [tons ] + RFI [tons ] + RFI,7 [tons ] + RFI 4 [tons ] EMISSIONS ACCORDING TO GRI / GHG PROTOCOL [tons ] EMISSIONS ACCORDING TO DEFRA [tons ] EMISSIONS ACCORDING TO ICAO 3 [tons ] EMISSIONS ACCORDING TO VFU 3 [tons ] One person, one way, from origin to destination American miles 3 For further information on other methods and RFI, see glossary Report Business Travel for: mascontour GmbH Reporting period: P.

11 FLIGHT Fuel per pkm vs. international benchmarks 7 FUEL PER PKM, AVERAGE PER DISTANCE CLASS [LITRES]: Short Medium Long average Current fuel usage: Calculated for ights contained in this report Worldwide average Product of number of passengers and kilometres travelled According to atmosfair Airline Index; More informationen on the AAI: Report Business Travel for: mascontour GmbH Reporting period: P.

12 FLIGHT CO reduction potential by switching to economy class CO35 EMISSIONS PER DISTANCE CLASS [TONS, + RFI.7] Short Medium Long Current emissions : Calculated for flights contained in this report Reduced emissions : All flights changed to economy class Report Business Travel for: mascontour GmbH Reporting period: P.

13 FLIGHT Applying the atmosfair Airline Index: Effects from selecting more climate efficient airlines Your upload data does not allow for this analysis. To illustrate the effects of choosing the most climate efficient airline, we have randomly selected the following ight: BA5,..3, LHR-JFK, Economy Class Airline of your choice Aircraft your staff flew with Resulting emissions, in tons ( + RFI.7) British Airways Boeing (Passenger). 49 Alternative airlines Aircraft that would have been used Alternative emissions in tons ( + RFI.7) Virgin Atlantic Airways Boeing (Passenger).7 Delta Air Lines Boeing (winglets) Passenger.3 American Airlines Boeing 777-3ER Passenger.4 The atmosfair Airline Index compares airlines based on their climate efficiency. This allows us to identify more climate efficient carriers on any specific connection as shown in the example above. For obvious reasons we would focus on your company s most emission intensive citypairs in a full analysis. But we don t stop there. We also compare the price structure of the most climate efficient carriers to show you real win-win-potentials: a reduction of emissions while saving travel expenses at the same time. This cost saving effect can of course be even enhanced further if your company limits the number of airlines to achieve additional quantity rebates with cleaner and cheaper carriers. Are you interested in assessing the efficiency of airlines serving your top city pairs? Contact us at airlineindex@atmosfair.de Code share partner are not listed. They appear in detailed atmosfair airline reportings. Report Business Travel for: mascontour GmbH Reporting period: P.3

14 CAR SUMMARY... 5 PER CATEGORY... 6 TOP CARS... 7 PER DISTANCE CLASS... 8 Report Business Travel for: mascontour GmbH Reporting period: P.4

15 CAR Summary TRAVEL Amount Unit Kilometres 3, km Miles, miles Days of use days Average kilometres per rental day,74 km Average miles per rental day,8 miles EMISSIONS Amount Unit.57 tons per day, average 84 kg per kilometre, average 63 g / km per mile, average 6 g / mile DAYS OF USE AS % OF TOTAL PER CATEGORY Economy Compact Intermediate Special Other Share EMISSIONS PER CATEGORY Unit Share Economy tons Compact tons Intermediate tons Special tons Other.57 tons American miles Report Business Travel for: mascontour GmbH Reporting period: P.5

16 unknown (3) unknown (.57) CAR Category compared by kilometres and emissions KILOMETRES PER CATEGORY ( KM): EMISSIONS BY CATEGORY (TONS): unknown (3) unknown (.57) Report Business Travel for: mascontour GmbH Reporting period: P.6

17 CAR Top cars sorted by kilometres and CO emissions ACRISS Total distance [km] TOP SORTED BY KILOMETRES Days of rent Average km per day emissions [tons] ACAR 3,48,74.57 Share of emissions [%] TOP SORTED BY EMISSIONS ACAR 3,48,74.57 Report Business Travel for: mascontour GmbH Reporting period: P.7

18 km () 5 km <5 km () km (.49t 86.%) 5 km <5 km (.8t 3.8%) CAR Distance class compared by rental days and emissions RENTAL DAYS PER DISTANCE CLASS: EMISSIONS PER DISTANCE CLASS: 5 km <5 km (.8t 3.8%) 5 km <5 km () km () km (.49t 86.%) Average kilometre per rental day Report Business Travel for: mas contour Reporting period: P.8

19 RAIL SUMMARY... TOP CITY PAIRS... PER SEAT CLASS... Report Business Travel for: mascontour GmbH Reporting period: P.9

20 RAIL Summary TRAVEL Amount Unit Kilometres 4, km Miles 3, miles Segments City Pairs Average segment distance in km km Average segment distance in miles 3 7 miles EMISSIONS 4 Amount Unit.7 tons per segment, average 8,68 g per passenger kilometre, average 4.4 g / km per passenger mile, average 68. g / mile American miles One person, one way, from origin to destination 3 Total distance of all segments divided by number of segments 4 Report Business Travel for: mascontour GmbH Reporting period: P.

21 RAIL Top city pairs by segments and CO emissions Routing Segments Segment length [km] Segment length [miles] Total distance [km] Total distance [miles] emissions [tons] % of emissions TOP - SORTED BY KILOMETRES Berlin Hbf - Jüterbog 84 5, Berlin Hbf - Hamburg Hbf 6 34,46, Berlin Hbf - Würzburg Hbf 5 34, TOP SORTED BY EMISSIONS Berlin Hbf - Hamburg Hbf 6 34,46, Berlin Hbf - Jüterbog 84 5, Berlin Hbf - Würzburg Hbf 5 34, One person, one way, from origin to destination Report Business Travel for: mascontour GmbH Reporting period: P.

22 Second: [%] Second:.7t [%] RAIL Seat class compared by segments and emissions SEGMENTS PER SEAT CLASS: EMISSIONS PER SEAT CLASS: Second: [%] Second:.7t [%] One person, one way, from origin to destination Report Business Travel for: mascontour GmbH Reporting period: P.

23 HOTEL SUMMARY... 4 AND OVERNIGHT STAYS... 5 PER COUNTRY... 6 Report Business Travel for: mascontour GmbH Reporting period: P.3

24 HOTEL Summary HOTEL CLASS all hotel classes star hotel star hotel 3 star hotel 4 star hotel 5 star hotel hotel class unknown Overnight stays [nights] EMISSIONS emissions [tons] from all overnight stays, all hotel classes 3.7 per overnight stay, star hotel. per overnight stay, star hotel. per overnight stay, 3 star hotel. per overnight stay, 4 star hotel.84 per overnight stay, 5 star hotel per overnight stay, hotel class unknown Report Business Travel for: mascontour GmbH Reporting period: P.4

25 HOTEL CO emissions and overnight stays per country and hotel category Country star hotel star hotel 3 star hotel 4 star hotel 5 star hotel unknown OVERNIGHT STAYS PER COUNTRY AND HOTEL CATEGORY MWI LAO DEU n/a MEX EMISSIONS [TONS] PER COUNTRY AND HOTEL CATEGORY MWI LAO DEU n/a MEX Report Business Travel for: mascontour GmbH Reporting period: P.5

26 MWI (55) LAO () DEU (4) n/a (9) MEX (3) MWI (.6 t) LAO (.84 t) DEU (.43 t) n/a (.9 t) MEX (.7 t) HOTEL Countries compared by overnight stays and emissions OVERNIGHT STAYS PER COUNTRY: EMISSIONS PER COUNTRY: MEX (3) n/a (9) MEX (.7 t) n/a (.9 t) DEU (4) DEU (.43 t) MWI (55) MWI (.6 t) LAO () LAO (.84 t) Report Business Travel for: mascontour GmbH Reporting period: P.6

27 CARBON OFFSETTING WITH ATMOSFAIR DEALING WITH EMISSIONS THAT CAN T BE AVOIDED OR REDUCED Travel activity type emissions [tons] Offsetting costs in EUR FLIGHT CAR.57 3 RAIL.7 4 HOTEL ATMOSFAIR OFFSET PROJECT EXAMPLES WHY OFFSETTING? Offsetting is an essential part of a comprehensive carbon strategy that aims at reducing your company s climate impact. It is an effective way to deal with those emissions that can t be avoided or further reduced through other measures. As a flexible instrument that is always available, offsetting minimises uncertainties within your carbon strategy and supports your organisation in reaching your selfset emission reduction targets. Furthermore, offsetting is a highly visible climate protection measure that can easily be communicated not only to your employees, customers and rating agencies but to all your stakeholders. ATMOSFAIR AWARD WINNING OFFSET PROJECTS Atmosfair is a non-profit organisation. We offer to offset the emissions from your business travel activities through atmosfair projects, for example the installation of renewable energies in developing countries. atmosfair projects are UN-certif ed (CDM) and additionally comply with the Gold Standard. If you decide to offset with atmosfair you will receive a tax-deductible donation receipt (valid with the German tax of ce; other national regulation may apply). Biogas from cow dung (Kenya): The project supplies small biogas units to dairy farmers which produce regenerative biogas. Efficient fuel wood stoves (Nigeria): The efficient stoves save about 8% of energy and help to reduce deforestation and indoor air pollution. atmosfair has been ranked No. quality offset provider in international comparative studies since 5. The assessed criteria were the quality of the offsetting projects and organisational as well as financial transparency. Category FLIGHT includes RFI.7 addition. Report Business Travel for: mascontour GmbH Reporting period: P.7

28 ANNEXES VDR REPORTING STANDARD BUSINESS TRAVEL... 9 OTHER CALCULATION METHODS... 3 GLOSSARY... 3 Report Business Travel for: mascontour GmbH Reporting period: P.8

29 VDR STANDARD CO-reporting business travel WHO IS BEHIND VDR? The German Business Travel Association VDR advocates efficient, economical and safe worldwide travel for companies. It represents the interest of German business regarding conditions for corporate travel and supports its members as a competence center for political activities. WHAT ARE THE BENEFITS OF USING THE VDR STANDARD? The VDR standard for the calculation of corporate travel is a standardised method to determine emissions created by business travel worldwide. Although previous approaches made it possible to estimate emissions from business travel, none of them took the specific characteristics of business trips into account. The VDR stan- dard covers all relevant business travel activities ( ights, hotel, rental cars, rail) and meets the requirements for worldwide application, accuracy, comparability and independence. The standard is exact enough to highlight the potential for reductions. Companies that generate their reports using this standard are entitled to label them with the VDR logo and seal reading produced according to the VDR standard. For full methodology details, please visit: Disclaimer: For maximum accuracy in calculating -emissions, we update our VDR database every year. For the travel activity flight for example these updates includes elements such as the most current flight plans, new airport locations, new aircraft types and most importantly new scientific findings if available.... in atmosfair, the VDR has gained an experienced partner for creating their standard. The quality of atmosfair s calculation methods has often been proven, including by the Federal Environmental Agency. Dr. Norbert Röttgen, Former federal minister for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety Due to inaccurate or incomplete customer travel data it can happen that the most precise calculation method suggested by the VDR standard can not be applied. In these cases fallback calculation methods are used which achieve the maximum precision that can be achieved with the provided data. In any case the calculations which this report is based on are compliant with the VDR standard. Report Business Travel for: mascontour GmbH Reporting period: P.9

30 OTHER CALCULATION METHODS GHG: The Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol, developed by World Resources Institute (WRI) and World Business Council on Sustainable Development (WBCSD), sets the global standard for how to measure, manage, and report greenhouse gas emissions.the GHG Protocol simplifes the calculation of specific per passenger in comparison to the VDR standard. Only the following factors are considered: - Flight distance (great circle distance between the airports, multiplied by a blanket uplift factor for detours). - Flight class: domestic, short-haul international, long-haul international. - Booking class: A distinction is made between economy, premium economy, business and rst class. GRI: The Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) is an international independent organisation that helps businesses, governments and other organisations understand and communicate the impact of business operations on critical sustainability issues. GRI's approach for calculating emissions is based on the method of the GHG Protocol. DEFRA: The UK Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) has developed a tool for calculating the emissions of travel activities such as ight, train journeys and car rides, among others. DEFRA s approach is based on the calculation method of the GHG Protocol but uses slightly different emission factors. ICAO: The International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) has developed an online calculator for its website which calculates emissions from air travel. The associated method uses ight pro les with ascend and descend phases, distinguishes between different types of aircrafts and also considers factors such as passenger load and co-loaded freight. Nonetheless, the ICAO calculator also has disadvantages: - If the city pair for which the is to be calculated is not in the ICAO data base, the ICAO calculator yields no result. - The ICAO calculator considers emissions only. It does not take other climate effects such as condensation trails into account. - There are only two seat classes: economy and premium. - The ICAO calculator assumes a full-economy seat con guration of all aircrafts. VFU: The German Verein für Umweltmanagement und Nachhaltigkeit in Finanzinstituten e.v. (VFU) has developed a systemof performance indicators to evaluate environmental performance. Transportation is a sub-item and includestrain journeys, air travel as well as road tra c. Just like the GHG Protocol and DEFRA methods the VFU tool simplifes the calculation with their own emission factors. Disclaimer: For maximum accuracy in calculating emissions we update the databases of each reporting standard every year. Report Business Travel for: mascontour GmbH Reporting period: P.3

31 GLOSSARY GENERAL TERMS MILES... American miles; american mile =.69 kilometres PKM... Passenger kilometre; product of number of passengers and kilometres travelled SEGMENT... one person, one way, from origin to destination FLIGHT TERMS AVERAGE SEGMENT DISTANCE... Total distance of all flights divided by number of flights CO VDR... CO emissions according to VDR methodology CO GRI / GHG... CO emissions according to GRI / GHG methodology CO DEFRA... CO emissions according to DEFRA methodology ICAO... emissions according to ICAO methodology VFU... emissions according to VFU methodology EMISSIONS IN ALTITUDES > 9 KM... emissions from fuel burned above 9 kilometres altitude (RFI applied, see RFI) + RFI... Sum of and NON emissions converted into emissions following the RFI logic (see RFI) CRUISE ALTITUDE... Cruise altitude of an airplane. Above 9, metres the atmosphere is far more sensitive for exhaust emissions (see RFI) RFI... Radiative forcing index, metrics established by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) to measure the impact of effects such as condensation trails or ozone formation. The RFI was established by the IPCC in 999. It measures the total climate impact, including contrails, ozone formation, etc. compared to the pure emissions. An RFI of means that the warming impact of the part of a flight that is conducted above 9 km altitude is twice as big as its effect alone. The range of the RFI is between -4 with.7 being the best estimate of the IPCC. Report Business Travel for: mascontour GmbH Reporting period: P.3

32 GLOSSARY CAR TERMS... emissions according to VDR methodology DAYS OF USE... Total number of car rental days DISTANCE CLASS... Average kilometre per rental day RAIL TERMS... emissions according to VDR methodology AVERAGE SEGMENT DISTANCE... Total distance of all train rides divided by number of train rides HOTEL TERMS... emissions according to VDR methodology OVERNIGHT STAYS... Total number of overnight stays Report Business Travel for: mascontour GmbH Reporting period: P.3