Bus Passenger Survey
|
|
- Catherine Rodgers
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 March 2012
2 Contents 1 Foreword 3 2 Key findings 4 3 Results by area Merseyside PTE (Merseytravel) South Yorkshire PTE Transport for Greater Manchester (TfGM) West Yorkshire PTE (Metro) Tyne & Wear PTE (Nexus) West Midlands PTE (Centro) Tees Valley Group West of England Partnership Bournemouth and Poole (combined) Unitary Authorities Dorset Durham County East Sussex Essex Hertfordshire Kingston upon Hull Lancashire Leicester City Norfolk Northamptonshire Nottingham City Staffordshire Stoke-on-Trent Surrey What did the research involve? 90
3 1 Foreword Passenger Focus published the first results in July At the time we said we were going to use the understanding of passengers satisfaction with their local bus service as the evidence to seek out improvements. Colin Foxall CBE Passenger Focus published the first Bus Passenger Survey results in July At the time we said we would use the understanding of passengers satisfaction with their local bus service as the evidence to seek out improvements in key areas such as: improved bus punctuality better passenger information improved levels of customer service We kept to this promise. From a growing and representative evidence base we were able to produce the type of comparative, benchmarked passenger research that really drove improvements for passengers. By working closely with several industry stakeholders we were able to: influence joint action plans between transport authorities and local bus operators commit authorities and operators to use our research as a benchmark to set future targets for improved passenger satisfaction convince operators to review and improve customer service processes In autumn 2011 we carried out our latest programme of work to measure bus passenger satisfaction; the results of which are contained within this report. This programme has covered over 21,000 responses from passengers across 23 areas within England, outside of London. Our most recent work has covered approximately two thirds of bus passenger journeys made in England outside of London. This included all six of the large Passenger Transport Executive areas in the Midlands and the north of England. In addition our work also covered a broad mix of other areas covering unitary and county authorities along with a significant range of bus operations and services. Our latest results tell us that that overall passenger satisfaction across the surveyed areas was consistently good, bus passengers rate just about all other specific journey factors lower. Significantly there are wide disparities with passengers ratings of value for money, not only between different areas, but between different operators and services within the same area. At a time when bus operator and transport authority funds have to be deployed more effectively than ever, it is good to see that the evidence of our work is helping target these valuable resources. We have already started work with transport authorities and operators to improve poor performance on factors such as: passenger perception of anti-social behaviour customer service, driver attitude highways issues affecting punctuality and reliability Since 2010 we have worked closely and collaboratively with bus service operators and transport authorities to explain the benefits of a consistent measure of bus passenger experience, the strength of the methodology, and our place as an independent organisation to conduct such a survey. We are pleased that in autumn 2011 survey, adoption of our has become more widespread, with increased survey sizes being purchased by five of the six PTEs, First UK Bus North Division, and National Express. Passenger Focus will look to further the use of BPS across the industry and are pleased that the Go-Ahead Group have committed to using our survey as their measure of their bus passengers experience. Colin Foxall CBE Chairman Passenger Focus 3
4 2 Key findings The proportion of passengers satisfied overall with their bus journey varied across areas from 79% to 91% (averaging 85%). In PTEs overall satisfaction ranged from 81% to 91%. The difference in overall satisfaction between free pass holders and fare payers shows free pass holders were unsurprisingly more satisfied, but not universally, with area figures ranging from 89% to 95% (averaging 92%); and fare payers less satisfied, with area figures ranging from 72% to 90% (averaging 82%). Passenger satisfaction with value for money ranged from 39% to 68% (averaging 56%) across the areas surveyed. The satisfaction with value for money within PTE areas ranged from 51% to 65%. Passenger satisfaction with punctuality ranged from 64% to 81% (averaging 72%). The figures amongst PTEs ranged from 64% to 77%. Passenger satisfaction with value for money ranged from 39 % to 68 % (averaging 56%) The profile of passengers shows a wide variation across the areas on key attributes: the proportion travelling on fare paid tickets ranged from 49% to 76% (averaging 64%); the proportion who say they have a disability ranged from 17% to 29% (averaging 21%); and those who have no access to private transport ranged from 24% to 40% (averaging 33%). There is a wide variation in what is provided at bus stops across the surveyed areas. Provision of shelter at stops averaged 77%, and seating averaged 61%. The provision of information was generally lower; electronic displays were present in 22% of journeys on average, timetables averaged 75%, and information on fares averaged 6%. Passengers report a number of factors affecting the length of their journeys. Three of these concerned road conditions: congestion affected 22% of journeys; road works 11%; and weather had limited impact averaging 3%. There were also three factors that were bus related: chief amongst these was Time it took passengers to board/ pay for tickets affecting 22% of journeys on average; followed by The bus waiting too long at stops averaging 8%; and finally The bus driver driving too slowly averaging 6%. The proportion of passengers who said they experience behaviour that caused them to worry or make them feel uncomfortable during their journey ranged from 6% to 18% (averaging 11%). 4
5 1 Overall satisfaction with the bus journey (%) % - very / fairly satisfied* Bournem'th & Poole (652) Dorset (568) Durham (450) E Sussex (613) Essex (498) Herts (435) Kingston UH (483) Lancs (546) Leics City (464) Merseyside PTE (1257) Norfolk (467) Tees Valley (1586) N. Hants (452) Notts City (524) South Yorks PTE (1464) Staffs (437) Stoke-on-Trent (434) Surrey (582) TfGM (3280) Tyne and Wear PTE (610) West Yorks PTE (1579) West Mids PTE (2680) West Eng. Part. (810) Very satisfied Fairly satisfied Neither satisfied nor Fairly Very Q33 - Overall, taking everything into account from start to end of this bus journey, how satisfied were you with your bus journey today? * Due to rounding the percentage very / fairly satisfied may not always be equal to the sum of the very and fairly satisfied values in the chart 5
6 2 2 Satisfaction with value for money fare-paying passengers (%) % - very / fairly satisfied* Bournem'th & Poole (250) Dorset (159) Durham (204) E Sussex (196) Essex (168) Herts** (143) Kingston UH (260) Lancs (203) Leics City (186) Merseyside PTE (456) Norfolk (225) Tees Valley (557) N. Hants (181) Notts City (283) South Yorks PTE (592) Staffs (166) Stoke-on-Trent (193) Surrey (169) TfGM (1547) Tyne and Wear PTE (251) West Yorks PTE (723) West Mids PTE (1379) West Eng. Part. (399) Very satisfied Fairly satisfied Neither satisfied nor Fairly Very Q35 How satisfied were you with the value for money of your journey? * Due to rounding the percentage very / fairly satisfied may not always be equal to the sum of the very and fairly satisfied values in the chart ** Note small sample size. 6
7 3 Satisfaction with punctuality of the bus (%) % - very / fairly satisfied* Bournem'th & Poole (603) Dorset (510) Durham (426) E Sussex (561) Essex (468) Herts (394) Kingston UH (446) Lancs (485) Leics City (420) Merseyside PTE (1118) Norfolk (435) Tees Valley (1466) N. Hants (392) Notts City (513) South Yorks PTE (1294) Staffs (392) Stoke-on-Trent (372) Surrey (546) TfGM (3002) Tyne and Wear PTE (554) West Yorks PTE (1437) West Mids PTE (2382) West Eng. Part. (725) Very satisfied Fairly satisfied Neither satisfied nor Fairly Very Q25 How satisfied were you with each of the following: The punctuality of the bus? * Due to rounding the percentage very / fairly satisfied may not always be equal to the sum of the very and fairly satisfied values in the chart 7
8 2 4 Range of scores for overall satisfaction for fare-payers and free pass holders 100% 95% 90% 85% 80% The highest scoring area 75% The 21 intermediate values The lowest scoring area 70% Fare payers Free pass holders Q33 - Overall, taking everything into account from start to end of this bus journey, how satisfied were you with your bus journey today? 8
9 5 Passenger profile and incidence of anti-social behaviour 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% The highest scoring area 5% The 21 intermediate values The lowest scoring area 0% Saying they have a disability * Limited or no access to private transport ** Incidence of anti-social behaviour *** * Q43 Do you have a disability or long term illness related to the following...? (Net yes) ** Access to private transport: a combination of responses to Q45 In terms of having a car to drive which of the following applies; and Q46 In terms of being able to ask someone else to drive which of the following applies? *** Q28 Did other passengers behaviour give you cause to worry or make you feel uncomfortable during your journey? 9
10 2 6 Range of scores for factors affecting journey length Q30 - Was the length of your journey affected by any of the following (note: more than one response was permissible) 10
11 3 Introduction to area results The survey was conducted within all six metropolitan county areas (PTEs), two informal groupings of Unitary Authority areas, and fifteen other authority areas. This section shows the results at area level and for any Bus Service Operators within the area who have substantial sample sizes (greater than 150). Larger sample sizes were specified for PTEs and the two informally grouped areas; the results shown for Bus Service Operators in the smaller sample sized areas are headline results only. The results for the areas are presented in the following order: Metropolitan Counties Merseyside PTE (Merseytravel) South Yorkshire PTE Transport for Greater Manchester (TfGM) Tyne & Wear (Nexus) West Midlands (Centro) West Yorkshire PTE (Metro) Other authority area groupings Tees Valley Group* West England Partnership** Other authority areas Bournemouth Borough Council and Borough of Poole Council Dorset County Council Durham County Council East Sussex County Council Essex County Council Hertfordshire County Council Kingston Upon Hull City Council Lancashire County Council Leicester City Council Norfolk County Council Northamptonshire County Council Nottingham City Council Staffordshire County Council Stoke-on-Trent City Council Surrey County Council Throughout the Area Results, behavioural results are based on all survey respondents, and passengers opinion ratings are based on those respondents that gave an opinion. All results are based on weighted values. In the report the numbers in brackets shown after the question/category text are the actual numbers of passenger responses generating the answer value shown. *comprising: Darlington Borough Council, Hartlepool Borough Council, Middlesbrough Council, Redcar & Cleveland Borough Council, and Stockton-on-Tees Borough Council. **comprising: Bath and North East Somerset Council, Bristol City Council, North Somerset Council, and South Gloucestershire Council. 11
12 3 Merseyside PTE (Merseytravel) Key findings In total, 1,293 passengers participated in the survey in this area. The table on the opposite page shows the percentage of passengers satisfied/ with various aspects of their bus journeys. The main findings are summarised below. 86 % > of passengers are satisfied overall with their journey 84% for fare paying passengers and 90% for free pass holding passengers are satisfied overall with their journey 56 % of fare paying passengers are satisfied with the value for money 73 % of passengers are satisfied with the punctuality of the bus Profile of passengers in this area (%) Main factors fare paying journeys (without free passes) 64 saying they have a disability 24 no access to private transport 39 Factors affecting journey length Passengers were asked whether any factors affected journey length (they could answer more than one question). The table below shows the percentage of passengers affected by each factor. Congestion/traffic jams 18 Road works 11 The bus driver driving too slowly 5 Poor weather conditions 3 The bus waiting too long at stops 7 Time it took passengers to board/pay for tickets 20 Anti-social behaviour Passengers were asked if, during their journey, other passengers behaviour gave them cause to worry or made them feel uncomfortable. 10 % of passengers said they had cause to worry or felt uncomfortable during their journey 12
13 Results for the Merseytravel area OVERALL SATISFACTION WITH THE JOURNEY All passengers (1,257) All fare-paying passengers (473) All free pass holders (698) Age (186) Age (345) Passengers commuting (329) Passengers not commuting (853) Passengers saying they have a disability (384) SATISFACTION WITH VALUE FOR MONEY All fare paying passengers (456) Passengers commuting (250) Passengers not commuting (189) Age (153) Age (283) SATISFACTION WITH PUNCTUALITY Satisfaction with punctuality (1,118) Peak hours: 8am - 9:30am and 4pm - 6pm (202) Off peak hours: 6am - 10pm outside of peak hours (887) SATISFACTION WITH THE BUS STOP Overall satisfaction with the bus stop (1,242) Its general condition/standard of maintenance (1,141) Its freedom from graffiti/vandalism (1,046) Its freedom from litter (1,035) Your personal safety at the stop (1,048) SATISFACTION ON THE BUS Route number & destination info on outside of bus (1,155) The cleanliness & condition of the outside of bus (1,170) The ease of getting onto and off the bus (1,235) The length of time it took to board the bus (1,196) The cleanliness & condition of the inside of bus (1,233) The information provided inside the bus (1,023) The availability of seating or space to stand (1,210) The comfort of the seats (1,216) Provision of grab rails to stand/move within the bus (1,200) The temperature inside the bus (1,208) Your personal security whilst on the bus (1,189) The length of time your journey took (1,218) SATISFACTION WITH THE BUS DRIVER How near to the kerb/stop the bus stopped (1,207) The driver s appearance (1,169) The greeting/welcome you got from the driver (1,161) The helpfulness and attitude of the driver (1,169) The time the driver gave you to get to seat (1,191) Smoothness/freedom from jolting during the journey (1,180) Safety of the driving (i.e. speed, driver concentrating) (1,199)
14 3 Results for Arriva routes within the Merseytravel area OVERALL SATISFACTION WITH THE JOURNEY All passengers (762) All fare-paying passengers (325) All free pass holders (391) Age (<150) Age (222) Passengers commuting (236) Passengers not commuting (487) Passengers saying they have a disability (213) SATISFACTION WITH VALUE FOR MONEY All fare paying passengers (313) Passengers commuting (179) Passengers not commuting (<150) Age (<150) Age (186) SATISFACTION WITH PUNCTUALITY Satisfaction with punctuality (679) Peak hours: 8am - 9:30am and 4pm - 6pm (<150) Off peak hours: 6am - 10pm outside of peak hours (534) SATISFACTION ON THE BUS Route number & destination info on outside of bus (693) The cleanliness & condition of the outside of bus (703) The ease of getting onto and off the bus (745) The length of time it took to board the bus (726) The cleanliness & condition of the inside of bus (747) The information provided inside the bus (622) The availability of seating or space to stand (728) The comfort of the seats (731) Provision of grab rails to stand/move within the bus (721) The temperature inside the bus (730) Your personal security whilst on the bus (720) The length of time your journey took (740) SATISFACTION WITH THE BUS DRIVER How near to the kerb/stop the bus stopped (732) The driver s appearance (709) The greeting/welcome you got from the driver (697) The helpfulness and attitude of the driver (702) The time the driver gave you to get to seat (717) Smoothness/freedom from jolting during the journey (713) Safety of the driving (i.e. speed, driver concentrating) (722)
15 Results for Stagecoach routes within the Merseytravel area OVERALL SATISFACTION WITH THE JOURNEY All passengers (205) All fare-paying passengers (<150) All free pass holders (<150) Age (<150) Age (<150) Passengers commuting (<150) Passengers not commuting (<150) Passengers saying they have a disability (<150) SATISFACTION WITH VALUE FOR MONEY All fare paying passengers (<150) Passengers commuting (<150) Passengers not commuting (<150) Age (<150) Age (<150) SATISFACTION WITH PUNCTUALITY Satisfaction with punctuality (174) Peak hours: 8am - 9:30am and 4pm - 6pm (<150) Off peak hours: 6am - 10pm outside of peak hours (<150) SATISFACTION ON THE BUS Route number & destination info on outside of bus (186) The cleanliness & condition of the outside of bus (191) The ease of getting onto and off the bus (204) The length of time it took to board the bus (196) The cleanliness & condition of the inside of bus (200) The information provided inside the bus (171) The availability of seating or space to stand (203) The comfort of the seats (201) Provision of grab rails to stand/move within the bus (200) The temperature inside the bus (200) Your personal security whilst on the bus (198) The length of time your journey took (197) SATISFACTION WITH THE BUS DRIVER How near to the kerb/stop the bus stopped (194) The driver s appearance (189) The greeting/welcome you got from the driver (190) The helpfulness and attitude of the driver (188) The time the driver gave you to get to seat (194) Smoothness/freedom from jolting during the journey (195) Safety of the driving (i.e. speed, driver concentrating) (197)
16 3 South Yorkshire PTE Key findings In total, 1,500 passengers participated in the survey in this area. The table on the opposite page shows the percentage of passengers satisfied/ with various aspects of their bus journeys. The main findings are summarised below. 86 % > of passengers are satisfied overall with their journey 80% for fare paying passengers and 92% for free pass holding passengers are satisfied overall with their journey 65 % of fare paying passengers are satisfied with the value for money 75 % of passengers are satisfied with the punctuality of the bus Profile of passengers in this area (%) Main factors fare paying journeys (without free passes) 51 saying they have a disability 24 no access to private transport 29 Factors affecting journey length Passengers were asked whether any factors affected journey length (they could answer more than one question). The table below shows the percentage of passengers affected by each factor. Congestion/traffic jams 20 Road works 6 The bus driver driving too slowly 4 Poor weather conditions 3 The bus waiting too long at stops 6 Time it took passengers to board/pay for tickets 18 Anti-social behaviour Passengers were asked if, during their journey, other passengers behaviour gave them cause to worry or made them feel uncomfortable. 7 % of passengers said they had cause to worry or felt uncomfortable during their journey 16
17 Results for the South Yorkshire PTE area OVERALL SATISFACTION WITH THE JOURNEY All passengers (1,464) All fare-paying passengers (617) All free pass holders (738) Age (282) Age (425) Passengers commuting (429) Passengers not commuting (931) Passengers saying they have a disability (378) SATISFACTION WITH VALUE FOR MONEY All fare paying passengers (592) Passengers commuting (351) Passengers not commuting (219) Age (233) Age (322) SATISFACTION WITH PUNCTUALITY Satisfaction with punctuality (1,294) Peak hours: 8am - 9:30am and 4pm - 6pm (295) Off peak hours: 6am - 10pm outside of peak hours (972) SATISFACTION WITH THE BUS STOP Overall satisfaction with the bus stop (1,416) Its general condition/standard of maintenance (1,321) Its freedom from graffiti/vandalism (1,192) Its freedom from litter (1,222) Your personal safety at the stop (1,231) SATISFACTION ON THE BUS Route number & destination info on outside of bus (1,334) The cleanliness & condition of the outside of bus (1,356) The ease of getting onto and off the bus (1,430) The length of time it took to board the bus (1,383) The cleanliness & condition of the inside of bus (1,415) The information provided inside the bus (1,180) The availability of seating or space to stand (1,385) The comfort of the seats (1,399) Provision of grab rails to stand/move within the bus (1,364) The temperature inside the bus (1,406) Your personal security whilst on the bus (1,385) The length of time your journey took (1,403) SATISFACTION WITH THE BUS DRIVER How near to the kerb/stop the bus stopped (1,414) The driver s appearance (1,353) The greeting/welcome you got from the driver (1,366) The helpfulness and attitude of the driver (1,352) The time the driver gave you to get to seat (1,377) Smoothness/freedom from jolting during the journey (1,361) Safety of the driving (i.e. speed, driver concentrating) (1,368)
18 3 Results for First routes within the South Yorkshire PTE area OVERALL SATISFACTION WITH THE JOURNEY All passengers (818) All fare-paying passengers (337) All free pass holders (405) Age (<150) Age (248) Passengers commuting (238) Passengers not commuting (524) Passengers saying they have a disability (207) SATISFACTION WITH VALUE FOR MONEY All fare paying passengers (322) Passengers commuting (189) Passengers not commuting (<150) Age (<150) Age (185) SATISFACTION WITH PUNCTUALITY Satisfaction with punctuality (716) Peak hours: 8am - 9:30am and 4pm - 6pm (<150) Off peak hours: 6am - 10pm outside of peak hours (556) SATISFACTION ON THE BUS Route number & destination info on outside of bus (746) The cleanliness & condition of the outside of bus (763) The ease of getting onto and off the bus (805) The length of time it took to board the bus (782) The cleanliness & condition of the inside of bus (797) The information provided inside the bus (660) The availability of seating or space to stand (780) The comfort of the seats (781) Provision of grab rails to stand/move within the bus (774) The temperature inside the bus (792) Your personal security whilst on the bus (780) The length of time your journey took (792) SATISFACTION WITH THE BUS DRIVER How near to the kerb/stop the bus stopped (796) The driver s appearance (758) The greeting/welcome you got from the driver (772) The helpfulness and attitude of the driver (760) The time the driver gave you to get to seat (771) Smoothness/freedom from jolting during the journey (771) Safety of the driving (i.e. speed, driver concentrating) (774)
19 Results for Stagecoach routes within the South Yorkshire PTE area OVERALL SATISFACTION WITH THE JOURNEY All passengers (496) All fare-paying passengers (237) All free pass holders (238) Age (<150) Age (<150) Passengers commuting (166) Passengers not commuting (298) Passengers saying they have a disability (<150) SATISFACTION WITH VALUE FOR MONEY All fare paying passengers (229) Passengers commuting (<150) Passengers not commuting (<150) Age (<150) Age (<150) SATISFACTION WITH PUNCTUALITY Satisfaction with punctuality (439) Peak hours: 8am - 9:30am and 4pm - 6pm (<150) Off peak hours: 6am - 10pm outside of peak hours (289) SATISFACTION ON THE BUS Route number & destination info on outside of bus (454) The cleanliness & condition of the outside of bus (456) The ease of getting onto and off the bus (482) The length of time it took to board the bus (467) The cleanliness & condition of the inside of bus (479) The information provided inside the bus (405) The availability of seating or space to stand (469) The comfort of the seats (474) Provision of grab rails to stand/move within the bus (458) The temperature inside the bus (476) Your personal security whilst on the bus (466) The length of time your journey took (466) SATISFACTION WITH THE BUS DRIVER How near to the kerb/stop the bus stopped (472) The driver s appearance (455) The greeting/welcome you got from the driver (454) The helpfulness and attitude of the driver (452) The time the driver gave you to get to seat (464) Smoothness/freedom from jolting during the journey (451) Safety of the driving (i.e. speed, driver concentrating) (454)
20 3 Transport for Greater Manchester (TfGM) Key findings In total, 3,405 passengers participated in the survey in this area. The table on the opposite page shows the percentage of passengers satisfied/ with various aspects of their bus journeys. The main findings are summarised below. 84 % > of passengers are satisfied overall with their journey 82% for fare paying passengers and 93% for free pass holding passengers are satisfied overall with their journey 60 % of fare paying passengers are satisfied with the value for money 71 % of passengers are satisfied with the punctuality of the bus Profile of passengers in this area (%) Main factors fare paying journeys (without free passes) 70 saying they have a disability 19 no access to private transport 38 Factors affecting journey length Passengers were asked whether any factors affected journey length (they could answer more than one question). The table below shows the percentage of passengers affected by each factor. Congestion/traffic jams 26 Road works 16 The bus driver driving too slowly 6 Poor weather conditions 3 The bus waiting too long at stops 9 Time it took passengers to board/pay for tickets 23 Anti-social behaviour Passengers were asked if, during their journey, other passengers behaviour gave them cause to worry or made them feel uncomfortable. 13 % of passengers said they had cause to worry or felt uncomfortable during their journey 20
21 Results for the TfGM area OVERALL SATISFACTION WITH THE JOURNEY All passengers (3,280) All fare-paying passengers (1,589) All free pass holders (1,474) Age (757) Age (930) Passengers commuting (1,113) Passengers not commuting (1,930) Passengers saying they have a disability (810) SATISFACTION WITH VALUE FOR MONEY All fare paying passengers (1,547) Passengers commuting (957) Passengers not commuting (522) Age (662) Age (775) SATISFACTION WITH PUNCTUALITY Satisfaction with punctuality (3,002) Peak hours: 8am - 9:30am and 4pm - 6pm (690) Off peak hours: 6am - 10pm outside of peak hours (2,245) SATISFACTION WITH THE BUS STOP Overall satisfaction with the bus stop (3,231) Its general condition/standard of maintenance (2,982) Its freedom from graffiti/vandalism (2,696) Its freedom from litter (2,760) Your personal safety at the stop (2,871) SATISFACTION ON THE BUS Route number & destination info on outside of bus (3,052) The cleanliness & condition of the outside of bus (3,114) The ease of getting onto and off the bus (3,258) The length of time it took to board the bus (3,165) The cleanliness & condition of the inside of bus (3,249) The information provided inside the bus (2,706) The availability of seating or space to stand (3,179) The comfort of the seats (3,222) Provision of grab rails to stand/move within the bus (3,155) The temperature inside the bus (3,208) Your personal security whilst on the bus (3,193) The length of time your journey took (3,223) SATISFACTION WITH THE BUS DRIVER How near to the kerb/stop the bus stopped (3,156) The driver s appearance (3,034) The greeting/welcome you got from the driver (3,061) The helpfulness and attitude of the driver (3,026) The time the driver gave you to get to seat (3,104) Smoothness/freedom from jolting during the journey (3,102) Safety of the driving (i.e. speed, driver concentrating) (3,127)
22 3 Results for Arriva routes within the TfGM area OVERALL SATISFACTION WITH THE JOURNEY All passengers (848) All fare-paying passengers (385) All free pass holders (413) Age (166) Age (246) Passengers commuting (290) Passengers not commuting (493) Passengers saying they have a disability (232) SATISFACTION WITH VALUE FOR MONEY All fare paying passengers (372) Passengers commuting (241) Passengers not commuting (<150) Age (<150) Age (200) SATISFACTION WITH PUNCTUALITY Satisfaction with punctuality (774) Peak hours: 8am - 9:30am and 4pm - 6pm (195) Off peak hours: 6am - 10pm outside of peak hours (562) SATISFACTION ON THE BUS Route number & destination info on outside of bus (776) The cleanliness & condition of the outside of bus (796) The ease of getting onto and off the bus (840) The length of time it took to board the bus (811) The cleanliness & condition of the inside of bus (833) The information provided inside the bus (694) The availability of seating or space to stand (803) The comfort of the seats (825) Provision of grab rails to stand/move within the bus (804) The temperature inside the bus (824) Your personal security whilst on the bus (820) The length of time your journey took (824) SATISFACTION WITH THE BUS DRIVER How near to the kerb/stop the bus stopped (813) The driver s appearance (786) The greeting/welcome you got from the driver (804) The helpfulness and attitude of the driver (792) The time the driver gave you to get to seat (796) Smoothness/freedom from jolting during the journey (794) Safety of the driving (i.e. speed, driver concentrating) (797)
23 Results for First routes within the TfGM area OVERALL SATISFACTION WITH THE JOURNEY All passengers (1,103) All fare-paying passengers (510) All free pass holders (516) Age (236) Age (306) Passengers commuting (328) Passengers not commuting (686) Passengers saying they have a disability (292) SATISFACTION WITH VALUE FOR MONEY All fare paying passengers (493) Passengers commuting (278) Passengers not commuting (189) Age (201) Age (254) SATISFACTION WITH PUNCTUALITY Satisfaction with punctuality (995) Peak hours: 8am - 9:30am and 4pm - 6pm (215) Off peak hours: 6am - 10pm outside of peak hours (760) SATISFACTION ON THE BUS Route number & destination info on outside of bus (1,031) The cleanliness & condition of the outside of bus (1,049) The ease of getting onto and off the bus (1,094) The length of time it took to board the bus (1,066) The cleanliness & condition of the inside of bus (1,091) The information provided inside the bus (926) The availability of seating or space to stand (1,074) The comfort of the seats (1,086) Provision of grab rails to stand/move within the bus (1,064) The temperature inside the bus (1,079) Your personal security whilst on the bus (1,070) The length of time your journey took (1,085) SATISFACTION WITH THE BUS DRIVER How near to the kerb/stop the bus stopped (1,061) The driver s appearance (1,031) The greeting/welcome you got from the driver (1,022) The helpfulness and attitude of the driver (1,016) The time the driver gave you to get to seat (1,043) Smoothness/freedom from jolting during the journey (1,045) Safety of the driving (i.e. speed, driver concentrating) (1,056)
24 3 Results for Stagecoach routes within the TfGM area OVERALL SATISFACTION WITH THE JOURNEY All passengers (870) All fare-paying passengers (529) All free pass holders (291) Age (278) Age (275) Passengers commuting (396) Passengers not commuting (423) Passengers saying they have a disability (159) SATISFACTION WITH VALUE FOR MONEY All fare paying passengers (519) Passengers commuting (357) Passengers not commuting (<150) Age (248) Age (241) SATISFACTION WITH PUNCTUALITY Satisfaction with punctuality (805) Peak hours: 8am - 9:30am and 4pm - 6pm (219) Off peak hours: 6am - 10pm outside of peak hours (565) SATISFACTION ON THE BUS Route number & destination info on outside of bus (811) The cleanliness & condition of the outside of bus (826) The ease of getting onto and off the bus (858) The length of time it took to board the bus (842) The cleanliness & condition of the inside of bus (863) The information provided inside the bus (716) The availability of seating or space to stand (851) The comfort of the seats (856) Provision of grab rails to stand/move within the bus (846) The temperature inside the bus (854) Your personal security whilst on the bus (845) The length of time your journey took (858) SATISFACTION WITH THE BUS DRIVER How near to the kerb/stop the bus stopped (838) The driver s appearance (783) The greeting/welcome you got from the driver (798) The helpfulness and attitude of the driver (793) The time the driver gave you to get to seat (820) Smoothness/freedom from jolting during the journey (826) Safety of the driving (i.e. speed, driver concentrating) (833)
25 West Yorkshire PTE (Metro) Key findings In total, 1,630 passengers participated in the survey in this area. The table overleaf shows the percentage of passengers satisfied/ with various aspects of their bus journeys. The main findings are summarised below. 85 % > of passengers are satisfied overall with their journey 83% for fare paying passengers and 90% for free pass holding passengers are satisfied overall with their journey 56 % of fare paying passengers are satisfied with the value for money 77 % of passengers are satisfied with the punctuality of the bus Profile of passengers in this area (%) Main factors fare paying journeys (without free passes) 65 saying they have a disability 19 no access to private transport 31 Factors affecting journey length Passengers were asked whether any factors affected journey length (they could answer more than one question). The table below shows the percentage of passengers affected by each factor. Congestion/traffic jams 22 Road works 7 The bus driver driving too slowly 5 Poor weather conditions 4 The bus waiting too long at stops 7 Time it took passengers to board/pay for tickets 22 Anti-social behaviour Passengers were asked if, during their journey, other passengers behaviour gave them cause to worry or made them feel uncomfortable. 10 % of passengers said they had cause to worry or felt uncomfortable during their journey 25
26 3 Results for the Metro area OVERALL SATISFACTION WITH THE JOURNEY All passengers (1,579) All fare-paying passengers (749) All free pass holders (714) Age (316) Age (490) Passengers commuting (490) Passengers not commuting (994) Passengers saying they have a disability (366) SATISFACTION WITH VALUE FOR MONEY All fare paying passengers (723) Passengers commuting (404) Passengers not commuting (286) Age (276) Age (390) SATISFACTION WITH PUNCTUALITY Satisfaction with punctuality (1,437) Peak hours: 8am - 9:30am and 4pm - 6pm (327) Off peak hours: 6am - 10pm outside of peak hours (1,081) SATISFACTION WITH THE BUS STOP Overall satisfaction with the bus stop (1,533) Its general condition/standard of maintenance (1,421) Its freedom from graffiti/vandalism (1,298) Its freedom from litter (1,320) Your personal safety at the stop (1,357) SATISFACTION ON THE BUS Route number & destination info on outside of bus (1,475) The cleanliness & condition of the outside of bus (1,494) The ease of getting onto and off the bus (1,554) The length of time it took to board the bus (1,504) The cleanliness & condition of the inside of bus (1,554) The information provided inside the bus (1,306) The availability of seating or space to stand (1,518) The comfort of the seats (1,532) Provision of grab rails to stand/move within the bus (1,497) The temperature inside the bus (1,515) Your personal security whilst on the bus (1,509) The length of time your journey took (1,537) SATISFACTION WITH THE BUS DRIVER How near to the kerb/stop the bus stopped (1,520) The driver s appearance (1,460) The greeting/welcome you got from the driver (1,454) The helpfulness and attitude of the driver (1,447) The time the driver gave you to get to seat (1,487) Smoothness/freedom from jolting during the journey (1,484) Safety of the driving (i.e. speed, driver concentrating) (1,494)
27 Results for Arriva routes within the Metro area OVERALL SATISFACTION WITH THE JOURNEY All passengers (281) All fare-paying passengers (<150) All free pass holders (<150) Age (<150) Age (<150) Passengers commuting (<150) Passengers not commuting (187) Passengers saying they have a disability (<150) SATISFACTION WITH VALUE FOR MONEY All fare paying passengers (<150) Passengers commuting (<150) Passengers not commuting (<150) Age (<150) Age (<150) SATISFACTION WITH PUNCTUALITY Satisfaction with punctuality (258) Peak hours: 8am - 9:30am and 4pm - 6pm (<150) Off peak hours: 6am - 10pm outside of peak hours (202) SATISFACTION ON THE BUS Route number & destination info on outside of bus (266) The cleanliness & condition of the outside of bus (259) The ease of getting onto and off the bus (272) The length of time it took to board the bus (259) The cleanliness & condition of the inside of bus (274) The information provided inside the bus (222) The availability of seating or space to stand (265) The comfort of the seats (271) Provision of grab rails to stand/move within the bus (264) The temperature inside the bus (267) Your personal security whilst on the bus (267) The length of time your journey took (268) SATISFACTION WITH THE BUS DRIVER How near to the kerb/stop the bus stopped (269) The driver s appearance (255) The greeting/welcome you got from the driver (254) The helpfulness and attitude of the driver (255) The time the driver gave you to get to seat (266) Smoothness/freedom from jolting during the journey (258) Safety of the driving (i.e. speed, driver concentrating) (261)
28 3 Results for First routes within the Metro area OVERALL SATISFACTION WITH THE JOURNEY All passengers (957) All fare-paying passengers (532) All free pass holders (354) Age (231) Age (338) Passengers commuting (359) Passengers not commuting (546) Passengers saying they have a disability (207) SATISFACTION WITH VALUE FOR MONEY All fare paying passengers (517) Passengers commuting (302) Passengers not commuting (192) Age (204) Age (274) SATISFACTION WITH PUNCTUALITY Satisfaction with punctuality (862) Peak hours: 8am - 9:30am and 4pm - 6pm (236) Off peak hours: 6am - 10pm outside of peak hours (608) SATISFACTION ON THE BUS Route number & destination info on outside of bus (898) The cleanliness & condition of the outside of bus (920) The ease of getting onto and off the bus (950) The length of time it took to board the bus (926) The cleanliness & condition of the inside of bus (945) The information provided inside the bus (816) The availability of seating or space to stand (932) The comfort of the seats (937) Provision of grab rails to stand/move within the bus (916) The temperature inside the bus (929) Your personal security whilst on the bus (923) The length of time your journey took (940) SATISFACTION WITH THE BUS DRIVER How near to the kerb/stop the bus stopped (924) The driver s appearance (891) The greeting/welcome you got from the driver (886) The helpfulness and attitude of the driver (886) The time the driver gave you to get to seat (899) Smoothness/freedom from jolting during the journey (910) Safety of the driving (i.e. speed, driver concentrating) (913)
29 Results for Keighley & District routes within the Metro area OVERALL SATISFACTION WITH THE JOURNEY All passengers (196) All fare-paying passengers (<150) All free pass holders (<150) Age (<150) Age (<150) Passengers commuting (<150) Passengers not commuting (154) Passengers saying they have a disability (<150) SATISFACTION WITH VALUE FOR MONEY All fare paying passengers (<150) Passengers commuting (<150) Passengers not commuting (<150) Age (<150) Age (<150) SATISFACTION WITH PUNCTUALITY Satisfaction with punctuality (184) Peak hours: 8am - 9:30am and 4pm - 6pm (<150) Off peak hours: 6am - 10pm outside of peak hours (163) SATISFACTION ON THE BUS Route number & destination info on outside of bus (177) The cleanliness & condition of the outside of bus (183) The ease of getting onto and off the bus (192) The length of time it took to board the bus (184) The cleanliness & condition of the inside of bus (191) The information provided inside the bus (157) The availability of seating or space to stand (188) The comfort of the seats (188) Provision of grab rails to stand/move within the bus (185) The temperature inside the bus (186) Your personal security whilst on the bus (188) The length of time your journey took (189) SATISFACTION WITH THE BUS DRIVER How near to the kerb/stop the bus stopped (188) The driver s appearance (180) The greeting/welcome you got from the driver (184) The helpfulness and attitude of the driver (179) The time the driver gave you to get to seat (191) Smoothness/freedom from jolting during the journey (186) Safety of the driving (i.e. speed, driver concentrating) (188)
30 3 Tyne & Wear PTE (Nexus) Key findings In total, 629 passengers participated in the survey in this area. The table on the opposite page shows the percentage of passengers satisfied/ with various aspects of their bus journeys. The main findings are summarised below. 91 % > of passengers are satisfied overall with their journey 88% for fare paying passengers and 95% for free pass holding passengers are satisfied overall with their journey 63 % of fare paying passengers are satisfied with the value for money 79 % of passengers are satisfied with the punctuality of the bus Profile of passengers in this area (%) Main factors fare paying journeys (without free passes) 62 saying they have a disability 24 no access to private transport 32 Factors affecting journey length Passengers were asked whether any factors affected journey length (they could answer more than one question). The table below shows the percentage of passengers affected by each factor. Congestion/traffic jams 13 Road works 7 The bus driver driving too slowly 2 Poor weather conditions 2 The bus waiting too long at stops 5 Time it took passengers to board/pay for tickets 17 Anti-social behaviour Passengers were asked if, during their journey, other passengers behaviour gave them cause to worry or made them feel uncomfortable. 6 % of passengers said they had cause to worry or felt uncomfortable during their journey 30
Tram Passenger Survey (TPS) All networks
Tram Passenger Survey (TPS) All networks Rosie Giles Tel: Email: Rosie.Giles@transportfocus.org.uk results March Insight Team, Transport Focus, Fleetbank House, - Salisbury Square, London, ECY JX Contents
More informationBus Passenger Survey spring 2015 results Centro - West Midlands PTE area
Bus Passenger Survey spring 2015 results Centro - West Midlands PTE area Contact: Murray Leader, Insight Team, Transport Focus Fleetbank House, 2-6 Salisbury Square, London, EC4Y 8JX Tel: 0300 123 0843
More informationBus Passenger Survey Autumn 2017 Summary of key results in Wales
Bus Passenger Survey Autumn 2017 Summary of key results in Wales Wales region results Key findings Key findings by region Overall satisfaction with the journey (%) Mid Wales (994) North Wales (748) South
More informationNational Passenger Survey Autumn putting rail passengers first
National Passenger Survey Autumn 2005 putting rail passengers first What is Passenger Focus? Passenger Focus is the independent national rail consumer watchdog. Our mission is to get the best deal for
More informationNational Passenger Survey Spring putting rail passengers first
National Passenger Survey Spring 2006 putting rail passengers first What is Passenger Focus? Passenger Focus is the independent national rail consumer watchdog. Our mission is to get the best deal for
More informationNational Passenger Survey Spring putting rail passengers first
National Passenger Survey putting rail passengers first What is Passenger Focus? Passenger Focus is the independent national rail consumer watchdog. Our mission is to get the best deal for Britain s rail
More informationNational Passenger Survey Autumn putting rail passengers first
National Passenger Survey Autumn putting rail passengers first What is Passenger Focus? Passenger Focus is the independent national rail consumer watchdog. Our mission is to get the best deal for Britain
More informationNational Rail Passenger Survey Autumn 2013 Main Report
National Rail Passenger Survey Autumn 2013 Main Report What is Passenger Focus? Passenger Focus is the independent consumer watchdog for Britain s rail passengers and England s bus, coach and tram passengers
More informationRailway performance and subsidy statistics
Railway performance and subsidy statistics Standard Note: SN/SG/2199 Last updated: 2 October 2013 Author: Matthew Keep Social and General Statistics Section This Note provides data and commentary relating
More informationS31 Grant determination for a high needs strategic planning fund in : DCLG ref 31/2916
S31 Grant determination for a high needs strategic planning fund in 2016-17: DCLG ref 31/2916 Purpose of the fund Local authorities can use this fund to carry out a strategic review of their high needs
More informationNational Rail Passenger Survey Autumn 2015 Main Report
National Rail Passenger Survey Autumn 2015 Main Report Transport Focus is the independent transport user watchdog Our mission is to get the best deal for passengers and road users. With a strong emphasis
More informationTram Passenger Survey
Key findings Autumn 2015 Foreword Jeff Halliwell Now in its third year, our Tram Passenger Survey has covered passengers views of their journey in six network areas in Britain. For the second time this
More informationTransport Focus Train punctuality the passenger perspective. 2 March 2017 Anthony Smith, Chief Executive
Transport Focus Train punctuality the passenger perspective 2 March 2017 Anthony Smith, Chief Executive Transport Focus Independent transport user watchdog Rail passengers in Great Britain Bus, coach &
More informationPlanned Expenditure by Local Authorities: Services for Young People
Planned Expenditure by Local Authorities: Services for Young People Section 251 Under Section 251 of the Apprenticeships, Skills, Children and Learning Act 2009, local authorities are required to submit
More informationNational Rail Passenger Survey Main Report Spring 2018
National Rail Passenger Survey Main Report Spring 2018 Transport Focus is the independent transport user watchdog Our mission is to get the best deal for passengers and road users. With a strong emphasis
More informationNational Rail Passenger Survey: User Guidance Report. Autumn 2013 (wave 29)
National Rail Passenger Survey: User Guidance Report Autumn 2013 (wave 29) Rebecca Joyner Research Director Tel: 020 7490 9148 rebecca.joyner@bdrc continental.com Contents Page No. 1. Background... 1 2.
More informationHealthwatch is the independent champion for people who use health and social care services.
B R I E F I N G State of Support Local Healthwatch Funding 2017/18 30 November 2017 Overview Healthwatch is the independent champion for people who use health and social care services. Across the country
More informationDEVOLUTION OF RAIL FRANCHISING. A new strategy for rail in the North of England
DEVOLUTION OF RAIL FRANCHISING A new strategy for rail in the North of England A BETTER RAILWAY IN THE NORTH We want the economy and prosperity of the North to grow and rail will play a pivotal role in
More informationUnderstanding Visitor Satisfaction
Understanding Visitor Satisfaction 2013-14 Debrief by TNS at VisitEngland 11 th November 2014 What we will cover: Introduction Tracking performance over time Headline performance by segment The drivers
More informationTransport Focus 2016 Bus Passenger Survey Briefing 22 March Liverpool
Transport Focus 2016 Bus Passenger Survey Briefing 22 March 2017 - Liverpool Presentation of BPS 2016 results David Sidebottom & Robert Pain Bus Passenger Survey 2016 - Scope 42 areas in England: a. 6
More informationRail passengers priorities for improvement November 2017
Rail passengers priorities for improvement November 2017 Rail passengers priorities for improvement November 2017 Foreword We asked more than 12,800 passengers across the country to rank 31 possible improvements
More informationNational Rail Passenger Survey: User Guidance Report. Spring 2014 (wave 30)
National Rail Passenger Survey: User Guidance Report Spring 2014 (wave 30) Rebecca Joyner Director Tel: 020 7490 9148 rebecca.joyner@bdrc continental.com Contents Page No. 1. Background... 1 2. Summary
More informationNational Rail Passenger Survey: User Guidance Report
National Rail Passenger Survey: User Guidance Report Spring 2015 (Wave 32) Rebecca Joyner Director Tel: 020 7490 9148 rebecca.joyner@bdrc continental.com Contents Page No. 1. Background... 1 2. Summary
More informationSchool improvement monitoring and brokering grant provisional allocations for illustrative purposes
School improvement monitoring and brokering grant provisional allocations for illustrative purposes The school improvement monitoring and brokering grant was announced on 30 November 2016. This grant of
More informationCommunity Rail Partnership Action Plan The Bishop Line Survey of Rail Users and Non-Users August 2011 Report of Findings
Community Rail Partnership Action Plan The Bishop Line Survey of Rail Users and Non-Users August 2011 Report of Findings Analysis and report NWA Social Research 1 Contents Page No. A. Summary of Main Findings...
More informationPOLICE GRANT REPORT ENGLAND AND WALES 2018/19 TABLES. Table 1: Provisional change in total direct resource funding compared to 2017/18
POLICE GRANT REPORT ENGLAND AND WALES 2018/19 TABLES Table 1: Provisional change in total direct resource funding compared to 2017/18 2017/18* 2018/19* Cash increase 2017 reserves as percentage of funding**
More informationNational Rail Passenger Survey: User Guidance Report
National Rail Passenger Survey: User Guidance Report Autumn 2015 (Wave 33) Rebecca Joyner Director Tel: 020 7490 9148 rebecca.joyner@bdrc-continental.com Contents Page No. 1. Background... 1 2. Summary
More informationCouncil Tax since
27 December 2015 Council Tax since 1996-97 Since 2010, central government has offered grants to local authorities to freeze or cut Council Tax. Additionally, local authorities wishing to Council Tax by
More information2018 TOWN HALL RICH LIST. Theo Hutchinson April 2018
2018 TOWN HALL RICH LIST Theo Hutchinson April 2018 For the eleventh comprehensive list of local authority employees in the United Kingdom whose total annual 6-17 financial year, the most recent full year
More informationThe case for rail devolution in London. Submission to the London Assembly Transport Committee. June Response.
Response The case for rail devolution in London Submission to the London Assembly Transport Committee Pedro Abrantes Senior Economist pteg Support Unit Wellington House 40-50 Wellington Street Leeds LS1
More informationNumbers achieving 3 A grades in specific A-Level combinations by school type and LEA
Numbers achieving 3 A grades in specific A-Level combinations by school type and LEA Statistics Report Series No. 9 Joanne L. Emery February 2009 Research Division Statistics Group Assessment, Research
More informationThe Pennine Class 185 experience
The Pennine Class 185 experience What do passengers think? May 2007 Passenger Focus is the independent national rail consumer watchdog. It is an executive non-departmental public body sponsored by the
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. PC24/2007 PROLIFIC AND OTHER PRIORITY OFFENDER ISSUES; DRUG TESTING OF PPOs ON LICENCE; DRUG TESTING IN APPROVED PREMISES
Probation Circular PC24/2007 PROLIFIC AND OTHER PRIORITY OFFENDER ISSUES; DRUG TESTING OF PPOs ON LICENCE; DRUG TESTING IN APPROVED PREMISES IMPLEMENTATION DATE: 16 July 2007 EXPIRY DATE: July 2012 TO:
More information2016-BASED HOUSEHOLD PROJECTIONS
2016-BASED HOUSEHOLD PROJECTIONS PLANNING DESIGN ENVIRONMENT PEGASUSGROUP.CO.UK ECONOMICS 2016-BASED HOUSEHOLD PROJECTIONS The Office for National Statistics (ONS) released its 2016-household projections
More informationNetwork Rail 2014 Customer Survey Report
GfK 2014 GfK Business Network Rail Customer Report 2014 Network Rail 2014 Customer Survey Report Route Report: Anglia Prepared by: January 2015 14-Jan-15 / 1 GfK 2014 GfK Business Network Rail Customer
More informationDriving Customer Satisfaction
Driving Customer Satisfaction Getting the most out of the VE Brand & Satisfaction Tracker Jim Eccleston, TNS RI Travel & Tourism Destinations Conference 20 th October, 2011 Today s Coverage The context
More informationAir Support Study. HMI Matt Parr CB. CCs Council 18 October 2017
Air Support Study HMI Matt Parr CB CCs Council 18 October 2017 Fleet size and utilisation Number of bases Hours flown 35 35,000 31 30 30,000 25 25,000 20 20,000 15 15 15,000 10 10,000 5 5,000 0 2008/09
More informationFINAL POLICE GRANT REPORT ENGLAND AND WALES 2019/20 TABLES
FINAL POLICE GRANT REPORT ENGLAND AND WALES TABLES Table 1: Provisional change in total resource funding for England and Wales, compared to 2018/19 Total resource funding including pensions grant in *
More informationA passenger perspective on the TransPennine. Sharon Hedges May 2014
A passenger perspective on the TransPennine Express franchise Sharon Hedges May 2014 Passenger Focus Independent watchdog for Britain s rail passengers* Extensive research to inform evidencebased campaigning
More informationVisitor Attractions Trends in England 2017
Visitor Attractions Trends in England 2017 Annual Report for Heritage Counts Prepared for Historic England Report Contents 1. Introduction and Background 2 1.1 Visitor Attraction Definition 2 1.2 Research
More informationVisitor Attractions Trends in England 2014
Visitor Attractions Trends in England 2014 Annual Report for Heritage Counts Prepared for Historic England 1. Introduction and Background This report presents key tables from the historic properties element
More informationNational Station Improvement Programme. Halifax Station - Final report
National Station Improvement Programme Halifax Station - Final report January 2010 National Station Improvement Plan Halifax Station Summary Report Passenger Focus April 2009 Prepared by:... Approved by:...
More informationT bu ab l u a lar statement r s
Yearly Yearly Meeting Meeting of of the the Religious Religious Society Society of of Friends Friends (Quakers) (Quakers) in in Britain Britain Tabular statement Compiled for Yearly Meeting Gathering,
More informationCORNWALL VISITOR SURVEY 06/07. Final report. Produced by South West Tourism Research Department For and on behalf of Visit Cornwall.
CORNWALL VISITOR SURVEY 06/07 Final report Produced by South West Tourism Research Department For and on behalf of Visit Cornwall September 2007 Contents Slide Executive summary 3 Chapter 1: Introduction
More informationTabular statement. Yearly Meeting of the Religious Society of Friends (Quakers) in Britain
Yearly Meeting of the Religious Society of Friends (Quakers) in Britain Tabular statement Compiled for Yearly Meeting, Friends House, London, 27 30 May 2016 Membership patterns in Britain Yearly Meeting
More informationThank you for your request for information regarding Officers deployed to the London Olympics which has now been considered.
c/o PO BOX 481 Fareham Hampshire PO14 9FS Tel: 02380 674255 Email: acpo.request@foi.pnn.police.uk FREEDOM OF INFORMATION REQUEST REFERENCE NUMBER: 000105/12 Thank you for your request for information regarding
More informationNational Station Improvement Programme. Uckfield Station Final report
National Station Improvement Programme Uckfield Station Final report January 2010 National Station Improvement Plan Uckfield Station Summary Report Passenger Focus April 2009 Prepared by:... Approved by:...
More informationTRANSPORT FOR GREATER MANCHESTER COMMITTEE REPORT FOR RESOLUTION
TRANSPORT FOR GREATER MANCHESTER COMMITTEE REPORT FOR RESOLUTION DATE: 11 November 2011 SUBJECT: REPORT OF: Proposed making of a Quality Partnership Scheme for the A6 corridor between Manchester and Hazel
More information#element of bullying / harassment South West 2gether NHS FT Mental Health Small
1 South West 2gether NHS FT Mental Health Small 3 2 0 3 0 Aintree University Hospital NHS FT Yorks and Humber Airedale NHS FT Combined Acute and Community Small 28 0 8 7 1 North West Alder Hey Children's
More informationNEWS RELEASE. GB Drink Drive Trends Revealed. From Release Reference Date
NEWS RELEASE From Release Reference Date Richard Owen Under embargo until 0000 Wednesday 16 th December GB Drink Drive Trends 2015 Tuesday, 15 th December 2015 GB Drink Drive Trends Revealed New study
More informationThe local elections of 1 May 1997
The local elections of 1 May 1997 Research Paper 97/82 27 June 1997 The local elections that took place in many parts of England on 1 May were overshadowed by the general election and the results of them
More informationVisitor Attractions Trends in England 2016
Visitor Attractions Trends in England 2016 Annual Report for Heritage Counts Prepared for England 1. Introduction and Background This report presents key tables from the properties element of the Survey
More informationHeritage Line Community Rail Partnership Darlington to Bishop Auckland Railway Line Survey of Users and Non-Users January to March 2010
Heritage Line Community Rail Partnership Darlington to Bishop Auckland Railway Line Survey of Users and Non-Users January to March 2010 Analysis and report NWA Social Research 1 Contents Page No. A. Summary
More informationNational Passenger Survey TOC Report for East Midlands Trains Spring 2011
National Passenger Survey TOC Report for 11 Contacts: David Greeno Passenger Focus 1 Drummond Gate London, SW1V QY Tel: 13 83 Email: david.greeno@passengerfocus.org.uk David Chilvers BDRC Continental Kingsbourne
More informationIntroduction to European Commission Funding: ERDF and JESSICA
Developing interest - appendix: March 2013 Appendix 1: Introduction to European Commission Funding: ERDF and JESSICA European Regional Development Funding (ERDF) aim[s] to strengthen economic and social
More informationNew Northern, new look. Customer Report
New Northern, new look Customer Report Autumn 217 Coming Together Our first new train is nearing completion at the CAF factory in Spain 18 months of change The station improvement trial is complete and
More informationResearch Note th June Council liabilities
Research Note 136 26th June 2014 Council liabilities Public sector debt is forecast by the Office for Budgetary Responsibility to exceed 1.3 trillion in 2014-15. 1 However, as explained by previous TaxPayers
More informationRoyal Parks Stakeholder Research Programme 2014
1 Royal Parks Stakeholder Research Programme 2014 Park profile: Greenwich Park (Waves 1-3) January 2015 Technical note 2 This slide deck presents findings from three waves of survey research conducted
More informationCONTENTS. Executive Summary : Section One: Our Remit : Section Two: Views of Park Mark Award Holders...05
Safer Parking Report 2017 CONTENTS Executive Summary...02 1: Section One: Our Remit...04 2: Section Two: Views of Park Mark Award Holders...05 3: Section Three: Views of Car Park Users...18 4. Section
More information2.3 On 27 November, the Department for Transport issued guidance on the use of the powers contained in the Act.
Director: Dave Pearson, Director of Transport Services Report to: Bradford District Consultation Sub-Committee Date: 22 January 2018 Subject: Information Report 1 Purpose 1.1 Matters of information relating
More informationWorkless households for areas across the UK in 2010
Workless households for areas across the UK in 2010 Coverage: UK Date: 08 September 2011 Geographical Area: Local Authority County Theme: Labour Market Animated YouTube Video A short video podcast explaining
More informationSystem Improvements & Future Needs
June 2005 System Improvements & Future Needs Ian Coles - Data & Systems Coordinator JMP Consulting 2005 JMP Consulting on behalf of the TRICS Consortium TRICS System Improvements & Future Needs New features
More informationCivil Aviation Authority: UK Aviation Consumer Survey. Key Findings. Autumn 2018
Civil Aviation Authority: UK Aviation Consumer Survey Key Findings Autumn 2018 1 % Satisfied Satisfaction: Overall Most people are satisfied with their experience of flying. Passengers are almost twice
More informationTAKING THE NORTH FURTHER
TAKING THE NORTH FURTHER STAKEHOLDER NEWSLETTER JULY / AUGUST 2018 Dear Stakeholder Summer is here and things are definitely hotting up in terms of our transformation. The Class 185 upgrade is very close
More informationThe local elections of 4 May Research Paper 95/ May 1995
The local elections of 4 May 1995 Research Paper 95/59 10 May 1995 This paper provides a brief summary of the local elections which took place in most of England and Wales on 4 May 1995. It also summarises
More informationAUTHORITY Central Bedfordshire Bedford Mid and South Bedfordshire Luton Bracknell Forest Reading Slough W Berkshire Windsor & Maidenhead Wokingham
COUNTY AUTHORITY DESIGNATION CONTACT Bedfordshire Central Bedfordshire Unitary Authority RightsofWay@centralbedfordshire.gov.uk Bedford Metropolitan Borough row@bedford.gov.uk Mid and South Bedfordshire
More informationa strategic location a fantastic logistics network
A689 60 A1(M) Sedgefield A689 A689 Newton Aycliffe A6072 A167 A19 A68 59 Stockton on Tees Middlesbrough 58 A167 A1150 A66 Longnewton A19 A68 Darlington A67 A174 57 A66(M) A66 Planned road Yarm A1(M) A67
More informationRegional Volunteer registration form
Regional Volunteer registration form Please clearly complete all sections of this form, sign the agreement and return it along with a passport-sized photograph to: War Memorials Trust, 1 st Floor, 14 Buckingham
More informationCUSTOMER SATISFACTION INDEX OF SINGAPORE 2017 Q2 RESULTS OVERVIEW AIR TRANSPORT AND LAND TRANSPORT
CUSTOMER SATISFACTION INDEX OF SINGAPORE 2017 Q2 RESULTS OVERVIEW AIR TRANSPORT AND LAND TRANSPORT 2017 Q2 SCORES AIR TRANSPORT AND LAND TRANSPORT 74.4 Air Transport 77.1 Airport* 77.1 Changi Airport 74.2
More informationWest Midlands and Chiltern. Route Utilisation Strategy. Research Findings
West Midlands and Chiltern Route Utilisation Strategy Research Findings September 2011 West Midlands and Chiltern Route Utilisation Strategy Research Findings In September 2010, Passenger Focus surveyed
More informationNational Passenger Survey TOC Report for Chiltern Railways Autumn 2011
National Passenger Survey TOC Report for Contacts: David Greeno Passenger Focus 1 Drummond Gate London, SW1V QY Tel: 13 837 Email: david.greeno@passengerfocus.org.uk David Chilvers BDRC Continental Kingsbourne
More informationCAA Passenger Survey Report 2017
Business Intelligence (CAA Strategy & Policy Department) CAA Passenger Survey Report 2017 A survey of passengers at Birmingham, East Midlands, Gatwick, Heathrow, Leeds Bradford, Liverpool, London City,
More informationNational Research and Visitor Satisfaction Update
National Research and Visitor Satisfaction Update Sharon Orrell Head of Research and Insights, VisitEngland 10 March 2015 2014 England Headline Performance Trends Domestic Overnight Tourism Trends Since
More informationPolicy committee Item: 11 Ref: PC086. National Rail Performance Report - Quarter (Oct-Dec 2015)
Policy committee 23.02.16 Item: 11 Ref: PC086 National Rail Performance Report - Quarter 3 2015-16 (Oct-Dec 2015) February 2016 London TravelWatch is the official body set up by Parliament to provide a
More informationNorthern Rail Limited. Passengers Charter. Final Version
Northern Rail Limited Passengers Charter Final Version November 2004 Contents 1 PASSENGERS CHARTER...2 1.1 INTRODUCTION...2 1.2 THE INFORMED CUSTOMER...3 1.3 BUYING A TICKET...4 1.4 CUSTOMERS WITH DISABILITIES
More informationOn-Train Provision of Tickets Mystery Shopping Report
On-Train Provision of Tickets Mystery Shopping Report Prepared by: Continental Research 132-140 Goswell Road London EC1V 7DY t: 020 7490 5944 f: 020 7490 1174 Agency Contact: Dave Chilvers Colin Shaddick
More informationMore transplants new lives
More transplants new lives Transplant Activity in the UK 2002-2003 Executive Summary Transplantation is one of the successes of modern medicine. During 2002-2003, 2,780 people had their life saved or improved
More informationTourism Business Monitor Accommodation Report. Wave 2 Post-Easter holidays
Tourism Business Monitor 2017 Accommodation Report Wave 2 Post-Easter holidays Contents Background Key Findings Business Dashboards Visitor Profile Business Performance Workforce Business Confidence 2
More informationProperty Investment Guide: Reading
Property Investment Guide: Essential investment information READING sourcedreading.com Introduction 900 MILLION INVESTED IN THE STATION, CROSSRAIL AND BUOYANT ECONOMY Hi My name is Adam Vickers and I am
More informationTimetable Change Research. Re-contact survey key findings
Timetable Change Research Re-contact survey key findings Key project objectives Measure the impact of the timetable changes on customers, what actions have they taken as a result Gauge how have the timetable
More informationIsles of Scilly Online Visitor Survey Final report. Produced for and on behalf of the Islands Partnership. May 2016
Isles of Scilly Online Visitor Survey 2015 Final report Produced for and on behalf of the Islands Partnership by The South West Research Company Ltd. May 2016 Contents Page Summary 3 Introduction 7 Visitor
More informationCivil Aviation Authority:
Civil Aviation Authority: UK Aviation Consumer Survey August 2018 CONTENTS Background and method Headline measures Flying behaviour Recent experience Travel disruption Disability Key driver analysis Public
More informationSurvey of Britain s Transport Journalists A Key Influencer Tracking Study Conducted by Ipsos MORI Results
Survey of Britain s Transport Journalists A Key Influencer Tracking Study Conducted by Ipsos MORI 2014 Results Methodology This report presents the findings of the 2014 study of Transport Journalists,
More informationHouse prices in London continue to climb
www.nationwide.co.uk/hpi Q2 2014 Embargoed until 0700 Wed 2 Jul 2014 House prices in London continue to climb All UK regions saw annual price rises in Q2 2014 London continues to lead, with annual price
More information2015 Metro User Christchurch
2015 Metro User Christchurch Research Report June 2015 www.researchfirst.co.nz Contents 2015 Metro User Christchurch 1 Research Context and Design 03 1.1 Introduction 03 1.2 Research Objectives 03 1.3
More informationThe Economic Impact of BT Group plc in the UK
2018 Edition The Economic Impact of BT Group plc in the UK A report by Hatch Regeneris for BT Group plc 1 Contents 2 Introduction 3 BT Group plc across the UK 11 London & the South East 12 3 Our Report
More informationCUSTOMER SATISFACTION INDEX OF SINGAPORE 2018 Q2 RESULTS OVERVIEW AIR TRANSPORT AND LAND TRANSPORT
CUSTOMER SATISFACTION INDEX OF SINGAPORE 2018 Q2 RESULTS OVERVIEW AIR TRANSPORT AND LAND TRANSPORT 2018 Q2 SCORES AIR TRANSPORT AND LAND TRANSPORT 75.4 Air Transport 78.0 Airport* 78.0 Changi Airport 74.5
More informationMost regions saw price falls during 2012
www.nationwide.co.uk/hpi Embargoed until 0700 Thurs 3 Jan 2013 Most regions saw price falls during 2012 11 out of 13 UK regions saw annual price falls during 2012 London best performing region in 2012
More informationProperty Investment Guide: West London
Property Investment Guide: West London Essential investment information WEST LONDON sourcedwestlondon.com Introduction West London DIVERSE AND CHARMING 2 Hi My name is Kathy Bianchi and I am the Director
More informationNational Transport Plan our response. Diane McCrea Board Member for Wales
National Transport Plan our response Diane McCrea Board Member for Wales National Transport Plan response our evidence National Rail Passenger Survey (NRPS) Over 30,000 passengers surveyed twice a year
More informationUK Universities Quick Dial
UK Universities Quick Dial To use the abbreviated dialling codes, press *11 on your handset followed by the appropriate code below. There is no need key 9 for an outside line. University Telephone No Abbreviated
More informationTourism Business Monitor Visitor Attractions Report. Wave 4 Mid-July until end of the Summer holidays
Tourism Business Monitor 20 Visitor Attractions Report Wave 4 Mid-July until end of the Summer holidays Background, objectives and research method Tourism Business Monitor designed to measure, monitor
More information2013 Business & Legislative Session Visitor Satisfaction Survey Results
2013 Business & Legislative Session Visitor Satisfaction Survey Results Completed by Juneau Economic Development Council in partnership with The Alaska Committee August 2013 JEDC research efforts are supported
More informationTable 4.1 Organisation and management
Table 4.1 Organisation and management North East Offered to: M'g't Main Partner Others Nu Pr Se Sp Ps RU In Ot by fund'g authorities Gateshead a a a r a a Lib Lib n/a North Tyneside a a a a a a a a Lib
More information1. Shrewsbury Aberystwyth Rail Liaison Committee held on Friday, 12 th February 2016.
Paper to: The Montgomeryshire Committee on Wednesday, 13 th April 2016. Author: County Councillor J. Michael Williams, Powys County Council s Montgomeryshire Rail Representative. Subject: The Shrewsbury
More informationPassenger Focus Bus Punctuality Project Bus Punctuality seminar, 19 September 2013
Passenger Focus Bus Punctuality Project Bus Punctuality seminar, 19 September 2013 The project and the seminar Improving punctuality is bus passengers top priority 1. So, two years ago, Passenger Focus
More informationGlasgow Queen Street Station Redevelopment research
Glasgow Queen Street Station Redevelopment research May 2015 Contact: Sultana Idris, Insight Team, Transport Focus Fleetbank House, 2-6 Salisbury Square, London, EC4Y 8JX Tel: 0300 123 0860 Email: Sultana.Idris@transportfocus.org.uk
More informationRail Delivery Group. Consultation on the future of the East Midlands rail franchise
Rail Delivery Group Response to: Department for Transport Consultation on the future of the East Midlands rail franchise Date: 11 October 2017 Rail Delivery Group Limited Registered Office, 2nd Floor,
More informationReport. Passengers' Priorities for Improvements in Rail Services. Report for Passenger Focus. June 2007
Report Passengers' Priorities for Improvements in Rail Services Report for Passenger Focus June 2007 Document Control Project Title: MVA Project Number: Document Type: Directory & File Name: Passengers'
More informationEast Midlands Rail Franchise Public Consultation
Scarborough Leeds York Manchester Liverpool Doncaster Sheffield Barton-on -Humber Crewe Chesterfield Matlock Worksop Lincoln Mansfield Grimsby Cleethorpes Skegness Stoke-on-Trent Derby ottingham Grantham
More information