SOUTH CAMBRIDGESHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL SOUTH EAST REGIONAL AIRPORT STRATEGY
|
|
- Erick Boyd
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 SOUTH CAMBRIDGESHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL REPORT TO Leader and Cabinet 28 th November 2002 AUTHOR: Planning Director Purpose SOUTH EAST REGIONAL AIRPORT STRATEGY 1. To determine the Council s response to the consultation by the Department for Transport on the South East Regional Airport Strategy (SERAS). 2. This paper was reported to Planning Policy Advisory Group on 11 th November and should be read in conjunction with the draft minutes of the meeting (Appendix 1). Background 3. Air passenger numbers have risen by 462% in the last 30 years, from 32 million in 1970 to 180 million in The projected demand, if unrestricted, would treble to 500 million passengers per annum (mppa) by 2030, 300 million in the south-east. This would be the equivalent of another 5 or 6 new Heathrows. 4. At the same time the UK airports are reaching capacity. Following the publication of the White Paper in 1998, the Government is now proposing to look ahead 30 years in an Air Transport White Paper which will provide for the long-term future of aviation and airports in the UK. The Government has therefore embarked upon one of its largest public consultation exercise with the publication of a number of studies looking at regional airport development. One of these regional studies is for the south east and east of England and is known as SERAS. 5. The existing situation at airports in the south east is: Heathrow: the runways are full for 15 hours a day (Gatwick is in a similar position, but less severe) Stansted: operating close to the permitted level of 15mppa (although recently granted an extension to 25mppa) Heathrow has a problem with operating efficiency due to congestion (65% flights were delayed in 4 th quarter of 2000) A shortage of slots at the main London airports and their high value has reduced the numbers of internal flights to regional airports in the UK 6. The SERAS study had the following objectives: To develop a better understanding of the demand for, and constraints on, airports and air service development in the South East and East of England, consider how
2 these might be addressed, and evaluate how any future proposals might impact on the aviation strategies being developed for other parts of the UK. To examine options for the sustainable development of airports and air services in the area over the next 30 years as a key input to the preparation of a new national airports policy statement. To ensure that full consideration is given in the development of airports and air service provision to the environmental, economic, employment, housing and transport implications, in the light of regional economic and spatial planning objectives for London, the South East and the East of England; and to inform future reviews of Regional Planning Guidance and the Regional Development Agencies regional strategies for the three regions. 7. The consultation on South East airports seeks to address three questions: Should new airport capacity be provided in the South East over the next 30 years and if so, how much? A particular issue is whether there is a case for having at least one major hub airport. Where should any new airport capacity be located? A particular issue is whether or not Heathrow should be developed further. What measures would be needed to control and mitigate the environmental impacts of any airport growth? Meeting or Managing Demand 8. The SERAS and other regional studies appear to be based on projecting demand and meeting it. There is reference to the environmental consequences but not as that set out inppg13 on transport where Government policy is clearly stated as being designed to reduce the need to travel for reasons of sustainability. There is considerable evidence that air travel is in fact the most energy consuming and environmentally polluting form of travel. 9. The Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution (Transport and the Environment) which was published in 1994 set out the energy consumption for various modes at typical occupancy as follows: Express coach 0.3 megajoules per passenger-km Diesel 125 train 0.8 ײ ײ Small diesel car 1.2 ײ ײ Small petrol car 1.4 ײ ײ Large diesel car 1.8 ײ ײ Large petrol car 2.8 ײ ײ Air, internal flight 3.5 ײ ײ 10. Although efficiency has increased since 1994 there is no evidence to suggest that the relative disparities between these modes has changed significantly. The Royal Commission concluded that aircraft are more environmentally damaging than other modes and that An unquestioning attitude towards future growth in air travel, and an
3 acceptance that the projected demand for additional facilities and services must be met, are incompatible with the aim of sustainable development. 11. The Government studies including SERAS place great emphasis on the potential adverse impacts of not meeting projected future demand. However the environmental consequences, including the impact on health, are regarded as essentially local issues. Yet one source estimates that a jumbo jet expels into the air as many pollutants, including nitrous oxides, causing smog, acid rain and a reduction in ozone as 1,000 cars. The suggestion that demand should be met must therefore be questionable if the Government is to retain credibility on its overall commitment to sustainable transport. The Government imposes high levels of fuel tax on road traffic yet there is no equivalent taxation at this level on aviation fuel. There may therefore be strong arguments for imposing additional taxation, either through an environmental tax or a levy on aviation fuel, or both so that air travel meets its true environmental costs as the Government is continually reminding the motoring public. Such fiscal measures could reduce the demand for travel and bring air transport into line with PPG13. Planning Policy Committee considered the Government s consultation paper on The Future of Aviation in February 2001 and resolved to question whether the lack of any reference to the need to travel in respect of aviation is consistent with the Government s policy for transport by other modes which use fossil fuels. Options for new airport capacity and their impacts 12. The airports considered in SERAS are shown in Figure 1 and the options put forward for addressing the air capacity issue are set out below: Figure 1: South East Airports considered in SERAS
4 Heathrow: one additional short runway Gatwick: no additional development proposed Stansted: options of one, two or three new runways Luton: realign or replace the existing runway to the south Cliffe: new airport with two or four runways London City, Southampton, Norwich: retention and enhancement to cater for local markets Alconbury: create a specialised low cost airport with substantial air freight capabilities Cambridge: no contribution due to noise constraints and the possibility of redevelopment for housing Other: Biggin Hill, Farnborough (no contribution due to planning constraints), Lydd, Manston, Shoreham and Southend provide limited local capacity 13. The potential increase in capacity of each of major schemes proposed is shown in Table 1 in Appendix 2. The table shows the base case of each airport at 2000, compared with the potential capacity with each of the proposed options. 14. Each of these options has been evaluated in the SERAS study against a number of factors, including noise, residential properties taken, land taken, heritage, ecology, local air quality, impact on water resources and regional planning issues. This information is summarised in Table 2 in Appendix 3. It recognises that Many of these factors are important determinants of local people s health and some of these concerns are built into the appraisal. It considers them to be essentially local issues. After each airport section I have added an officer comment in italics. HEATHROW 15. Terminal 5 is due to open in 2008, which will provide a capacity of the airport with two runways of around 89mppa. An option of a third 2000m runway is proposed, which would be half the length of the existing two and would not be suitable for large aircraft. 16. In addition, there would need to be a number of surface improvements, including signalling improvements on the rail network and a new rail line. Highway improvements would be needed on the A4 and M4 spur and a new southern link in a tunnel to the M3. However, this would also bring forward capacity problems on the M3, M4 and M25. Comment: Successive Governments have said that they would limit further development at Heathrow, and as such, any proposals are likely to meet fierce opposition from local residents. Any further development at the airport will lead to increased surface travel which it would not be possible to serve with high speed trains like European counterparts and generate increased traffic on the highways, adding to already congested routes.
5 GATWICK 17. BAA signed a planning agreement with West Sussex County Council in 1979 agreeing not to construct a second runway before On this basis a runway would not be open before 2024, late on in the 30-year period, and it has not been included. The omission from the options of Gatwick is now the subject of a legal challenge from Kent County Council. STANSTED 18. Stansted currently handles 15mppa, but has received permission to expand to 25mppa. With one runway this could expand to 35mppa. However, there are options for one, two or three new runways. The larger options would change the role of Stansted into a second international hub airport, particularly if no further expansion is proposed in the south-east. 19. There would be a requirement for new rail infrastructure in the form of a second rail tunnel from the airport to West Anglia main line and additional tracks would also be needed with the addition of one runway. If more than one runway is built, the additional frequency of service to London would require a new railway south of the airport. With the largest expansion, there may also be a need for an additional railway to the east, allowing services to Norwich, Ipswich and Chelmsford. In addition, new highway infrastructure would be required to provide dual-carriageway links from the airport to the A120 and M11, and even improvements to sections of the M11 as well as other works to cater for the growth in traffic. Comment: Expansion of Stansted has serious implications for the Cambridge sub-region. Due to the closeness of the airport, development of several runways will have a significant impact upon the city of Cambridge and South Cambridgeshire District. Expansion would result in a sectoral shift in employment from more distant areas. In addition, this is likely to present demand for a further 83,000 houses with the development of all the extra runways, which would put the current employment and housing markets under considerable stress and would result in a fundamental change in settlement pattern. It represents a major deviation from a carefully worked out strategy for the area being pursued through Regional Planning Guidance and the Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Structure Plan. As such, it is a compelling reason for arguing against Stansted s expansion. There are also clear ramifications for the next Regional Planning Guidance (RPG14) for the east of England which is currently at consultation on options also to be discussed at the meeting. English Heritage has in particular made expressed considerable alarm at the implications of major expansion at Stansted, and quote the Inspector at the Third London Airport Public Inquiry as saying A statement should be made on behalf of Government in unequivocal terms that the principle of developing Stansted beyond the capacity of its existing runway has now been abandoned and that it should never be brought forward again. Again he is quoted as saying that the impacts would be a catastrophe in environmental terms and that no landscaping scheme
6 could ever be devised which would effectively offset the impact of such a vast development affecting such an enormous area. Further development at Stansted would result in a significant increase in surface movements. The London to South Midlands (LSMMMS) and Cambridge to Huntingdon (CHUMMS) Multi Modal Studies have not taken this into account. Whilst improvements are currently being made to the M11 junction 8 to cope with current travel demand, they may not be sufficient to cope with the additional traffic generated. The M11 and A14, which are already heavily congestion during peak periods, would be stretched to over capacity. It may be easier to provide high-speed rail access to Stansted than Heathrow, by adding an extra two tracks on the Stansted Express route in the Lea Valley. However, the proposed improvements to the rail network would benefit London bound travellers and provide little to benefit passengers from Cambridge and the southeast. This would in turn exacerbate problems of road traffic in the area. LUTON 20. The Bedfordshire Structure Plan allows the airport to expand to a capacity of 10mppa and there are two options for replacing the existing runway with a new 3000m runway. However, there are no proposals for any additional runways. 21. There are already planned enhancements to the rail network, namely to Thameslink, Thameslink 2000 and Midland mainline. There is also scope to extend the Luton- Dunstable guided bus to the airport via the Airport Parkway station. A new Luton northeast bypass and widening of the A1081 from the M1 to Airport Way are required with the replacement runway. By 2030, there will need to be remedial measures on the M1 between junctions 9 and 13 to deal with a growth in traffic. Comment: The proposal for Luton is one of the least harmful of those proposed in the study. It also has the benefits of generating employment in an area designated for economic regeneration and there is also the flexibility to accommodate additional housing required. CLIFFE 22. Cliffe provides the opportunity to provide a purpose-built hub airport with four runways, although there would be significant environmental impact on the natural environment. The main reasons SERAS selected Cliffe as an option were: The availability of sufficient land for a major new airport Potentially good surface transport links with London and other areas The relatively low numbers of people affected by aircraft noise Potential for 24-hour operation to meet the needs of air freight The support an airport could give to regeneration policies in the Thames Gateway
7 23. There would be a range of rail links for regional and express services, provided by the North Kent Line and to the Channel Tunnel Rail Link. In addition, a multi-modal crossing of the Thames could provide a rail connection to the Tilbury-Southend line and there could be scope for rail connections through Crossrail. 24. The principle road connections to Cliffe would be links to the A2/M2 via the proposed Lower Thames Crossing to the A13/A128. Additional traffic created by the airport would require improvements to the A13 and capacity problems on the eastern sections of the M25 would arise sooner. When the airport reaches full size, there may also be a requirement for an additional road crossing of the Thames to provide better access to the Essex labour market and relieve crossings to the west. Comment: Whilst Cliffe airport would have major ecological impacts, it would also provide valuable employment in an area where there are 100,000 more people than jobs. With a local workforce, employment could be met with only limited additional housing development, for which there is some previously developed land available. There are excellent opportunities for high-speed rail links to the airport, providing a viable alternative to travel by road. It could also assist in the regeneration of the Thames Gateway areas of south Essex and north Kent. ALCONBURY 25. The SERAS study suggests that Alconbury has the potential to become a specialised low cost passenger airport with substantial air freight capabilities, an express parcel hub and aircraft maintenance facilities. It has an existing runway, access to the south east market, good strategic road and rail infrastructure, and, it is claimed, is significantly remote from large population centres allowing the possibility of night time operations. 26. Alconbury would be able to handle 1 million tonnes of freight annually, rising to 1.25 tonnes by 2030 and 5mppa with the existing runway constraints in the south east. However, if additional capacity is provided elsewhere, Alconbury could handle around a quarter of a million tonnes of freight and just over 1mppa. 27. Improvements would be needed to the A1(M)/A14 junction and a new access road, as well as a rail spur into the airport from the East Coast Main Line. 28. The study suggests that most of the employment could be met from the local labour market without having to attract people in from outside the area and that all the land needed for business and housing could be accommodated locally. Comment: Following the publication of the Cambridge Airport Study, Marshall Aerospace is considering various options including a potential move to Alconbury. A regional airport at Alconbury would provide employment opportunity within the Cambridge sub-region
8 without having to attract people from outside the area and thus reduce the need for additional housing development. This would be less likely if the full scale option were to be developed, as the study suggests 12,000 jobs could be created which would seem unlikely to be met from the immediate labour force. However, there are potential issues surrounding access, which may require improvements to local infrastructure, particularly the A1(M) and A14 and a new rail spur. Other considerations 29. The SERAS report is one of seven consultation documents covering the whole of the UK, as shown in Figure 2. It is important to consider what is proposed in other areas, as they can have implications for the south-east region. Figure 2: Airport consultation in the UK 30. Proposals in the Midlands include an option for a new airport in Church Lawford, situated between Coventry and Rugby. This proposal is only likely to be economically viable if there were no significant degree of capacity provided for in the south-east and it also assumes the closure of Birmingham International airport in Such an airport could generate wider economic benefits to the regional economy in the Midlands. It is expected that closure of Birmingham and Coventry airports and the creation of a new airport site could generate in the region of 100,000 jobs (direct and indirect) and present an opportunity for redevelopment, including 21,000 additional houses (20% of the Structure Plan requirement). It would also take trips from outside the region, mainly the south east, which would help to relieve pressure. 31. The paper covering the North of England focuses on Manchester airport, which already has two runways, the only other airport to Heathrow with twin runway capacity. There is potential to raise the profile of the airport in the European hierarchy. Even with two runways Manchester has the potential to accommodate 70mppa by the end of the forecasting period, larger numbers than Heathrow today. Implications are that Manchester could become the UK s largest charter airport and even an alternative
9 international hub, which could help claw back North of England traffic from the south east. 32. Expansion of Manchester airport could generate around 33,000 jobs by 2030, meeting local objectives for regeneration in the region. Labour could be pooled from the unemployment black spots in the east and south of Manchester. However, large numbers of the population (over 46mppa) would be affected by noise and many will be exposed to air quality in excess of the pollutant limits under the high growth scenario. In addition, growth of the airport beyond 30mppa will require limited highway improvements to relieve congestion on the M56 and the wider motorway network, including M6, M56 and M60. The South East Manchester Multi-Modal Study also identified the possibility of building an eastern link road to the airport. 33. The London to South Midlands and Cambridge to Huntingdon Multi Modal Studies did not include scenarios for further development at Stansted Airport, or the associated housing development which would be required. As a result, recommendations from the two studies dealt with lower levels of forecast traffic growth and were not designed to accommodate the significant levels likely to arise for expansion of Stansted. This in turn could have serious implications for the regions already congested infrastructure. 34. Stansted airport is currently used as a diversionary airport in the event of hijacking situations. If Stansted were to be expanded to a hub airport, presumably there would be a requirement for an alternative standby airport. This issue has not been dealt with by the consultation paper. Conclusions 35. The consultation paper raises a number of important issues surrounding air travel, not only in the southeast but also throughout the UK. There is no easy solution to meeting or managing future demand for air travel but care needs to be taken to ensure that proposals outlined in SERAS have minimal adverse impact upon the Cambridge sub-region. 36. It is important to also take into account Regional Planning Guidance 14, currently the subject of consultation on options, and the implications for future development in the region. It suggests continuing economic growth for the Cambridge area, particularly in terms of hi-tech development. Proposals for major expansion of Stansted could have serious implications for the area, generating severe development pressures not only close to Stansted itself, but also in the Cambridge Sub-Region. If there is pressure to develop major airport capacity in the south east, a new airport at Cliffe has certain advantages. Not withstanding the serious environmental implications of the development, an airport at Cliffe would provide valuable employment in an area where there are 100,000 more people than jobs, and such employment could be met locally, reducing the need for significant additional housing development. The location of the airport has excellent opportunities for high-speed rail links, providing a viable alternative to travel by car, whereas this is a major constraint at Stansted. 37. Further information on RPG 14 is contained in a separate Cabinet paper.
10 38. None. 39. None. Financial Implications Legal Implications Staffing Implications 40. Continuing involvement of Planning Policy staff. Sustainability Implications 41. Significant as set out in the report. Recommendation 42. It is recommended that this Council makes the following comments to the Department for Transport: Government should consider environmental impacts and tax fuel properly to reflect the true cost which would manage future demand in a way consistent with Government objectives on sustainable transport. There would be significant advantages, in terms of regeneration in giving priority to the development of regional airports outside the south-east. Manchester in particular has the potential to develop further as a hub airport. Whilst it is accepted that this could not totally substitute for additional capacity in the southeast, it would reduce the overall additional capacity needed in the south-east with there being less environmental problems as a result. Object to major additional capacity at Stansted would impact on carefully planned strategy in RPG/Structure Plan and have serious implications of noise, urbanisation, development pressures and traffic implications. If Stansted were expanded, what alternative provision would be made for emergency diversionary situations? Support further expansion of Luton because of its employment regeneration opportunities and the ability to support additional support housing Support the development of regional air facilities at Alconbury subject to further feasibility and transport studies. The priority for Alconbury should be the accommodation of Marshall Aerospace, the potential to develop an aerospace business cluster together with a regional airport rather than a small national budget carrier or freight facility which would serve national rather than subregional needs Support there being little scope for further development at Cambridge Airport and that, subject to Marshall Aerospace finding an acceptable alternative location, this presents a long term opportunity for the urban expansion of Cambridge
11 If major capacity has to be provided in the south-east, then Cliffe offers the best opportunity to develop an international hub airport with significant opportunities for regeneration in the Thames Gateway. Background Papers: Cambridgeshire Draft Structure Plan Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution 1994 Cambridge Airport Study, Stage 1 and Stage 2,Arup Economics & Planning July The Future development of Air Transport in the United Kingdom: South East, Dept. for Transport, July Consultation on options leading to Regional Planning Guidance for the East of England 2021, East of England Local Government Conference September The Future Development of Air Transport in the United Kingdom: South East: Stansted Proposals, English Heritage, October Contact Officers: Michael Monk, Principal Planning Policy Officer Claire Spencer, Senior Planning Policy Officer
12 APPENDIX 2 Table 1: Capacity benefits of additional development Terminal passengers (mppa) HEATHROW Use of airport in ,000 Capacity/forecast in 2030 with Terminal ,000 Capacity/forecast with 1 new runway in 2030 (Additional terminals/facilities and advances in air traffic control) ,000 (128) STANSTED Use of airport in ,000 Maximum use of existing runway ,000 Forecast in ,000 Capacity with 1 new runway ,000 Forecast with 1 new runway in ,000 Capacity with 2 new runways ,000 Forecast with 2 new runways in ,000 Capacity with 3 new runways ,000 Forecast with 3 new runways in ,000 LUTON Use of airport in ,000 Capacity / forecast in ,000 Either runway option capacity ,000 Forecast in ,000 CLIFFE Capacity with 2 runways ,000 Forecast with 2 runways in ,000 Capacity with 4 runways ,000 Forecast with 4 runways in ,000 Air transport movements (Annual ATMs)
13 APPENDIX 3 Table 2: Impacts of airport proposals DAYTIME NOISE (population exposed to >57 decibels) DAYTIME NOISE Area km 2 LAND / HERITAGE HEATHROW STANSTED LUTON CLIFFE , ,000 6, km Loss of 260 residential properties Loss of 228ha agricultural land (all Green Belt) Loss of 1 church, 1 Grade I & 8 Grade II Listed buildings 14,000-28,000 8, km 2 131km km 2 49km 2 Loss of 100 (1 runway) or 200 (2/3 runways) residential properties Loss of 700ha (1 runway) or 1200ha (2/3 runways) of high grade agricultural land Loss of 2 Scheduled Ancient Monuments (+ third 3 runway), 1 Grade II* (2/3 runways), 29 (1 runway), 50 (2 runways) or 64 (3 runways) Grade II Listed buildings Encroachment onto land designated as a countryside protection zone 19,000 (Southern) 14,000 (realigned) 112km 2 (Southern)1 07km 2 (realigned) Loss of 10 residential properties Loss of just over 100ha agricultural land Loss of 2 Grade II Listed buildings (realignment) or none (southern) affected 0 14, km 2 Loss of 1100 residential properties (some holiday homes) Loss of 2,000ha agricultural land Loss of 1 Grade I, 1 Grade II* and 7 Grade II Listed buildings Ecology Impact on several national & internal designated areas Thames Estuary & Marshes Special Protection Area and Ramsar site & Northward Hill SSSI/National Nature Reserve Risk of large birds colliding with aircraft
14 AIR QUALITY (population exposed to levels of nitrogen dioxide exceeding EU limits) WATER REGIONAL PLANNING By 2015, 35,000 people affected, which could drop by 5,000 if faster engine technology improvements are made Surface and groundwater at risk (can be controlled through appropriate management) Extra passengers will put additional demand on water resources Within the Western Policy Area designed to put minimal additional pressure on limited labour and land resources Could add 30,000 additional jobs at Heathrow in 2015 (falling to 10,000 in 2030) and more off site Associated requirements for land for housing and business will require further loss of Green Belt Small number exposed 20 by 2015 and no more than 300 by 2030 All options require several rivers to be diverted significant impact Extra passengers will put additional demand on water resources Impacts on wider London/Stansted/ Cambridge subregion Increase from 10,000 jobs to between 57,000 and 93,000 by 2030 Require significant change in land allocation, especially for housing Would need to attract workforce from further afield Not part of the current planning policy for the area Small number exposed by less 50 people (southern) & none (realigned) Groundwater risk to major aquifer (can be mitigated through appropriate construction techniques) Extra passengers will put additional demand on water resources Designated an Area for Economic Regeneration and would welcome more employment Employment could grow from 9,000 to 21,000 by 2030 Modest amount of housing would be required in excess of planned provision but there is flexibility to accommodate it No population is predicted to be exposed to levels of nitrogen dioxide that exceed EU limits Destroys marshes and creeks and increases risk of flooding elsewhere on the peninsula Extra passengers will put additional demand on water resources Generate economic development in Thames Gateway an area in need of regeneration Employment could grow to 53,000 by 2015 and 79,000 by 2030 Current labour catchment has 100,000 more workers than jobs Additional 162,000 homes might be provided by Regional Planning Guidance
SOUTH CAMBRIDGESHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL. Executive Director / Senior Planning Policy Officer
SOUTH CAMBRIDGESHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL REPORT TO: Leader and Cabinet 8 May 2008 AUTHOR/S: Executive Director / Senior Planning Policy Officer SOUTH CAMBRIDGESHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL S RESPONSE TO UTTLESFORD
More informationSOUTH CAMBRIDGESHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL
SOUTH CAMBRIDGESHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL REPORT TO: Leader and Cabinet 13 July 2006 AUTHOR: Executive Director / Principal Planning Policy Officer (Transport) STANSTED AIRPORT GENERATION 1 CONSULTATION ON
More informationThe Future of Air Transport
The Future of Air Transport Summary December 2003 The White Paper and the Government s role The White Paper sets out a strategic framework for the development of airport capacity in the United Kingdom
More informationTfL Planning. 1. Question 1
TfL Planning TfL response to questions from Zac Goldsmith MP, Chair of the All Party Parliamentary Group on Heathrow and the Wider Economy Heathrow airport expansion proposal - surface access February
More informationConsultation on Draft Airports National Policy Statement: new runway capacity and infrastructure at airports in the South East of England
Tony Kershaw Honorary Secretary County Hall Chichester West Sussex PO19 1RQ Telephone 033022 22543 Website: www.gatcom.org.uk If calling ask for Mrs. Paula Street e-mail: secretary@gatcom.org.uk 22 May
More informationEAST WEST RAIL EASTERN SECTION. prospectus for growth
EAST WEST RAIL EASTERN SECTION prospectus for growth September 2018 executive summary The East West Rail Consortium, a partnership of local authorities, rail operators and Network Rail, continues to promote
More informationResponse to the London Heathrow Airport Expansion Public Consultation
Response to the London Heathrow Airport Expansion Public Consultation Summary This report sets out the response to the Heathrow Airport s consultation on airport expansion and airspace change. The consultation
More informationAviation Position Statement
Aviation Position Statement January 2003 Wildlife and Countryside Link (Link) brings together environmental voluntary organisations in the UK united by their common interest in the conservation and enjoyment
More informationSubmission to the Airports Commission
Submission to the Airports Commission Greengauge 21 February 2013 www.greengauge21.net 1 1. Introduction Greengauge 21 is a not for profit company established to promote the debate and interest in highspeed
More informationStrategic Transport Forum 21 st September 2018
Strategic Transport Forum 21 st September 2018 Agenda Item 4: Heathrow Airport Expansion: Surface Access Strategy Update Recommendation: It is recommended that the Forum consider the update provided by
More information33 Horseferry Road HP20 1UA London SW1P 4DR. Tuesday 10 th October Dear Sir,
East Midlands Rail Franchise Programme Office Consultation Co-ordinator c/o Buckinghamshire County Council Zone 2/21 County Hall Department for Transport Walton Street Great Minster House Aylesbury 33
More informationAgenda Item 5: Rail East Midlands Rail Franchise Consultation
Strategic Transport Forum 15 th September 2017 Agenda Item 5: Rail East Midlands Rail Franchise Consultation Recommendation: It is recommended that the Forum agree (subject to any amendments agreed by
More informationSUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 2015
LAND USE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 2015 EAST MINILANDS EAST MINILANDS SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT DHL eastmidlandsairport.com OUR AIRPORT FOREWORD by Andy Cliffe Managing Director
More informationPerformance Criteria for Assessing Airport Expansion Alternatives for the London Region
Performance Criteria for Assessing Airport Expansion Alternatives for the London Region Jagoda Egeland International Transport Forum at the OECD TRB Annual Meeting 836 - Measuring Aviation System Performance:
More informationThe Government s Aviation Strategy Transport for the North (TfN) response
The Government s Aviation Strategy Transport for the North (TfN) response Transport for the North Background Good transport links are a crucial part of a strong economy supporting labour markets and delivering
More informationA Sustainable Air Quality Action Plan For Heathrow
A Sustainable Air Quality Action Plan For Heathrow Rob Gibson Strategic Pollution Officer IAPSC 6th June 2001 This afternoon we will:- Consider the Current Air Quality Situation at Heathrow Consider Policy
More informationReport to: Greater Cambridge Partnership Joint Assembly 18 January A10 Foxton level crossing bypass and travel hub
Report to: Greater Cambridge Partnership Joint Assembly 18 January 2018 Lead officer: Chris Tunstall GCP Director of Transport A10 Foxton level crossing bypass and travel hub 1. Purpose 1.1 The list of
More informationGATWICK AND WANDSWORTH
GATWICK AND WANDSWORTH 1. THE FUTURE OF AVIATION 2. GATWICK S VISION 3. WHY GATWICK IS BEST FOR WANDSWORTH THE TRANSFORMATION OF AVIATION Three current and future trends are transforming aviation: 1. Growth
More informationSUMMARY PROOF OF EVIDENCE. Gerald Kells Transport Policy and Campaigns Advisor
Highways Inquiry Procedure Rules 1994 Doc Ref: OBJ/0125 2 For a local inquiry into: SUMMARY PROOF OF EVIDENCE Gerald Kells Transport Policy and Campaigns Advisor For Friends of the Earth Cymru / Cyfeillion
More informationSTANSTED AIRPORT PLANNING APPLICATION UTT/18/0460/FUL SECTION 106 CONDITIONS TO BE REQUIRED IF PLANNING APPLICATION IS APPROVED
STANSTED MOUNTFITCHET PARISH COUNCIL STANSTED AIRPORT PLANNING APPLICATION UTT/18/0460/FUL SECTION 106 S TO BE REQUIRED IF PLANNING APPLICATION IS APPROVED 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Stansted Mountfitchet Parish
More informationProspect ATCOs Branch & ATSS Branch response to CAP Terminal Air Navigation Services (TANS) contestability in the UK: Call for evidence
Prospect ATCOs Branch & ATSS Branch response to CAP 1605 Terminal Air Navigation Services (TANS) contestability in the UK: Call for evidence Introduction This document sets out the views of Prospect s
More informationRoad Traffic Implications of a second runway at Gatwick Airport. Gatwick in perspective I. Prepared by a Senior Highway Engineer NUMBER 8
Gatwick in perspective I NUMBER 8 Road Traffic Implications of a second runway at Gatwick Airport Prepared by a Senior Highway Engineer A series of research papers on a second Gatwick runway Road Traffic
More informationAppendix 12. HS2/HS1 Connection. Prepared by Christopher Stokes
Appendix 12 HS2/HS1 Connection Prepared by Christopher Stokes 12 HS2/HS1 CONNECTION Prepared by Christopher Stokes Introduction 12.1 This appendix examines the business case for through services to HS1,
More informationQuestions inviting views and conclusions in respect of the three short-listed options
Questions inviting views and conclusions in respect of the three short-listed options Q1: What conclusions, if any, do you draw in respect of the three short-listed options? In answering this question
More informationQ: How many flights arrived and departed in 2017? A: In 2017 the airport saw 39,300 air transport movements.
Southampton Airport Masterplan FAQ 4 October 2018 Background Southampton Airport Today Q: How many passengers currently use Southampton Airport and how has this changed over the last 5 years? A: Over the
More informationConsultation by Luton BC on Planning Application for expansion of London Luton Airport (our ref: CB/13/00088/OAC)
Meeting: Development Management Committee Date: 13 February 2013 Subject: Consultation by Luton BC on Planning Application for expansion of London Luton Airport (our ref: CB/13/00088/OAC) Report of: Summary:
More informationAll wards within the Borough are likely to be affected by the Terminal 5 decision.
DECISION BY THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT, LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND THE REGIONS (DTLR) TO APPROVE THE HEATHROW TERMINAL 5 AND ASSOCIATED PLANNING APPLICATIONS REPORTING MEMBER: COUNCILLOR
More informationViews of London Forum of Amenity and Civic Societies to the House of Commons Environmental Audit Committee on the Airports Commission report
Views of London Forum of Amenity and Civic Societies to the House of Commons Environmental Audit Committee on the Airports Commission report Summary i) We strongly recommend that the Government reject
More informationWhangarei Airport. Prepared by Carine Andries 10/20173
Whangarei Airport Prepared by Carine Andries 10/20173 March 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 2 3 INTRODUCTION... 3 AIRPORT ROLE AND FUNCTION... 3 AIRPORT FEATURES AND CAPACITY... 3 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.5.1 3.5.2
More informationRESPONSE TO THE DEPARTMENT FOR TRANSPORT THE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT OF AIR TRANSPORT IN THE UK
RESPONSE TO THE DEPARTMENT FOR TRANSPORT THE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT OF AIR TRANSPORT IN THE UK NOVEMBER 2002 CONTENTS Page No. Executive Summary 2 Introduction 5 Format of Response 6 Overall Policy 6 The Regions
More informationSASIG Response to the TSC Inquiry into the Revised Proposal for an Airports National Policy Statement.
SASIG Response to the TSC Inquiry into the Revised Proposal for an Airports National Policy Statement. Introduction 1. SASIG welcomes the Transport Select Committee s inquiry into the revised proposal
More informationA140 study and Major Road Network
A140 study and Major Road Network Executive Summary The Government s new Transport Investment Strategy sets out a new long-term approach for government infrastructure spending. Funding will be targeted
More informationThe Future Development of Air Transport in the United Kingdom: South East
SOUTH EAST The Future Development of Air Transport in the United Kingdom: South East A National Consultation 1 1 MARK WAGNER FROM AVIATION-IMAGES.COM 2 BRITAIN ON VIEW 3 BRITAIN ON VIEW 4 BRITAIN ON VIEW
More informationSouth of England north-south connectivity
South of England north-south connectivity An outline economic case for the inclusion of north-south connectivity improvements to form part of the government s road investment strategy (RIS2) Weston-super-Mare
More informationTHE IMPACT OF STANSTED EXPANSION UPON SURFACE ACCESS NETWORKS
THE IMPACT OF STANSTED EXPANSION UPON SURFACE ACCESS NETWORKS Report to Stop Stansted Expansion Berkeley Hanover Consulting Suite 23 Coleridge House 4/5 Coleridge Gardens London NW6 3QH Tel: 020 7372 2600
More informationAppendix 9. Impacts on Great Western Main Line. Prepared by Christopher Stokes
Appendix 9 Impacts on Great Western Main Line Prepared by Christopher Stokes 9 IMPACTS ON GREAT WESTERN MAIN LINE Prepared by Christopher Stokes Introduction 9.1 This appendix evaluates the impact of
More informationCAA consultation on its Environmental Programme
CAA consultation on its Environmental Programme Response from the Aviation Environment Federation 15.4.14 The Aviation Environment Federation (AEF) is the principal UK NGO concerned exclusively with the
More informationAbout ABTA. Executive summary
ABTA response to the Department for Transport Draft Airports National Policy Statement new runway capacity and infrastructure at airports in the South East of England About ABTA ABTA The Travel Association
More informationChapter 12. HS2/HS1 Connection. Prepared by Christopher Stokes
Chapter 12 HS2/HS1 Connection Prepared by Christopher Stokes 12 HS2/HS1 CONNECTION Prepared by Christopher Stokes 12.1 This chapter relates to the following questions listed by the Committee: 3.1 Business
More informationSurface Access Congestion
Bristol Airport the connectivity challenge up to 2050 Mark Herbert Planning Manager Surface Access Congestion Surface Access Congestion Primary Catchment Area 7 MILLION Secondary Catchment Area 3 MILLION
More informationThe Mayor s draft The London Plan Consultation. Response from the Richmond Heathrow Campaign 2 March 2018
The Mayor s draft The London Plan Consultation Response from the Richmond Heathrow Campaign 2 March 2018 INTRODUCTION 1. This is the written response of the Richmond Heathrow Campaign to the Mayor s draft
More informationPlugging the greater Midlands region into global wealth
Plugging the greater Midlands region into global wealth A great airport for a great city Birmingham Airport will be at the centre of a network of great airports delivering aviation capacity and connectivity
More informationPROPOSED REVISIONS TO THANET DISTRICT COUNCIL S LOCAL PLAN (PREFERRED OPTIONS)
Agenda Item No 14 Subject: PROPOSED REVISIONS TO THANET DISTRICT COUNCIL S LOCAL PLAN (PREFERRED OPTIONS) Meeting and Date: Cabinet 1 March 2017 Report of: Nadeem Aziz, Chief Executive Portfolio Holder:
More informationStrategic Transport Forum
Strategic Transport Forum Friday 16 th March 2018 www.englandseconomicheartland.com Item 3: Innovation www.englandseconomicheartland.com Innovation work stream - EEH 1. Policy modelling 2. MaaS 3. EEH
More informationLSCC London. Stansted. Cambridge.Consortium
LSCC London. Stansted. Cambridge.Consortium Covering letter to Airports Commission We are pleased to submit a report undertaken for the London Stansted Cambridge Consortium (LSCC) on the economic impact
More informationSarah Olney s submission to the Heathrow Expansion Draft Airports National Policy Statement
Sarah Olney s submission to the Heathrow Expansion Draft Airports National Policy Statement https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/heathrow-expansion-draftairports-national-policy-statement Question
More informationSTRATEGIC INVESTMENT IN MANCHESTER AIRPORT
Report To: EXECUTIVE CABINET Date: 7 February 2018 Cabinet Deputy/Reporting Officer: Subject: Report Summary: Cllr Bill Fairfoull Executive Member (Finance & Performance) Tom Wilkinson, Assistant Director
More informationEconomic Development Sub- Committee
Report title: Economic Development Sub- Committee Item No. Date of meeting: 24 November 2016 A47 Road Investment Strategy - update Responsible Chief Tom McCabe Executive Director, Community Officer: and
More information3. Coach Supporting Statement
3. Coach Supporting Statement Content 1. Setting the Scene 2. Vision 3. Coaches and the Shared Priorities 4. Issues 5. Delivery Programme in the first Plan Period 2001/02 2005/06 6. Good Practice 7. Strategy
More informationInternational gateways and the strategic road network
International gateways and the strategic road network This report was commissioned by Highways England to inform the emerging Strategic Economic Growth Plan (SEGP) and better understand the relationship
More informationEast West Rail Consortium
East West Rail Consortium EWR Wider Economic Case: Refresh 18 th November 2015 Rupert Dyer Rail Expertise Ltd Rail Expertise Ltd. Tel: 01543 493533 Email: info@railexpertise.co.uk 1 Introduction 1.1 The
More informationUK Airport Operators Association
UK Airport Operators Association Airport Surface Access Conference Connecting the UK s economy: How better access to airports can boost growth Peter O Broin AOA Policy Manager Airport Surface Access Conference
More informationStansted Airport Planning Application for 43mppa. Presentation by SSE March 2018
Stansted Airport Planning Application for 43mppa Presentation by SSE March 2018 MAG Planning Application New Rapid Access Taxiway New Rapid Exit Taxiway 9 additional stands aircraft stands Unified aircraft
More informationToday we are showing you the early designs to improve the A27 at Arundel and we would like to hear your views on our options.
Welcome Welcome to the Highways England A27 Arundel Bypass public consultation. Thank you for coming. Today we are showing you the early designs to improve the A27 at Arundel and we would like to hear
More informationThe case for a local rail station. At Great Blakenham, Suffolk.
The case for a local rail station At Great Blakenham, Suffolk. The London to Norwich (Great Eastern) main rail line passes through Great Blakenham in Suffolk, a village which adjoins Claydon and Barham.
More informationAirport Master Plans
October 2004 (Revised February 2005) Briefing Airport Master Plans The risks and potential pitfalls for local authorities The 2003 Air Transport White Paper (ATWP) asked airport operators to produce or
More informationNEW GRADE A INDUSTRIAL / DISTRIBUTION BUILDING 47,060 SQ FT TO LET
Dartford Junction 1A NEW GRADE A INDUSTRIAL / DISTRIBUTION BUILDING,060 SQ FT TO LET DC2 PROLOGIS PARK LITTLEBROOK ON JUNCTION LOCATION FAST URBAN & PORT ACCESS 57M YARD DEPTH CONNECTIVITY & LABOUR prologislittlebrook.co.uk
More informationBarbara Cooper Director of Economic Development
From: Mark Dance Cabinet Member for Regeneration and Economic Development Barbara Cooper Director of Economic Development To: Subject: Regeneration Board 17 June 2014 MANSTON AIRPORT Classification: Unrestricted
More informationImages Revealed: Proposed HS4Air will create new transport hubs boosting regional economies and slash journey times beyond London.
Images Revealed: Proposed HS4Air will create new transport hubs boosting regional economies and slash journey times beyond London. A new image has been revealed for HS4Air, the proposal for a new high-speed
More informationAIREBOROUGH NEIGHBOURHOOD DEVELOPMENT FORUM
AIREBOROUGH NEIGHBOURHOOD DEVELOPMENT FORUM Designing A Thriving Place LBA Airport Link Road Consultation Leeds City Council Leeds LS2 8HD West Yorkshire 26 February 2016 Dear Sir This is the response
More informationDecember Media Briefing. The Air Transport White Paper. Making aviation sustainable?
December 2003 Media Briefing The Air Transport White Paper Making aviation sustainable? In June 2003, Alistair Darling, the Secretary of State for Transport, signalled the need for a change in direction
More informationRe: CAP 1541 Consultation on core elements of the regulatory framework to support capacity expansion at Heathrow
22 SEPTEMBER 2017 Stephen Gifford Civil Aviation Authority CAA House 45-59 Kingsway London WC2B 6TE Dear Stephen, Re: CAP 1541 Consultation on core elements of the regulatory framework to support capacity
More informationOperation of the UK Traffic Distribution Rules in relation to all-cargo services at London Gatwick Airport. Consultation paper by BAA Gatwick
Operation of the UK Traffic Distribution Rules in relation to all-cargo services at London Gatwick Airport Consultation paper by BAA Gatwick Introduction 1. This paper seeks the views of interested parties
More informationPenzance Heliport Ltd.
Penzance Heliport Ltd. Penzance Heliport Ltd is planning to reinstate the popular scheduled helicopter service between Penzance and the Isles of Scilly. To operate the service, it proposes to build a new
More informationLower Thames Crossing consultation response
Lower Thames Crossing consultation response Context: This is the response from Campaign for Better Transport to the Department for Transport s consultation Options for a new Lower Thames Crossing. Consultation
More informationEast Lancashire Highways and Transport Masterplan East Lancashire Rail Connectivity Study Conditional Output Statement (Appendix 'A' refers)
Report to the Cabinet Member for Highways and Transport Report submitted by: Director of Corporate Commissioning Date: 1 June 2015 Part I Electoral Divisions affected: All East Lancashire Highways and
More informationN4 Carrick-on-Shannon to Dromod Road Project. 2.1 Introduction
Chapter 2 Need for the Scheme 2.1 Introduction The National Primary Route N4, Dublin to Sligo is a strategic corridor from Dublin to the northwest and border counties (See RCSR 101 in Volume 2). The National
More informationConsumer Council for Northern Ireland response to Department for Transport Developing a sustainable framework for UK aviation: Scoping document
Consumer Council for Northern Ireland response to Department for Transport Developing a sustainable framework for UK aviation: Scoping document Introduction The Consumer Council for Northern Ireland (CCNI)
More informationScotland to England Journeys (million)
Introduction WRITTEN SUBMISSION FROM THE SCOTTISH CHAMBERS OF COMMERCE 17 OCTOBER 2008 SCC welcomes the chance to respond to the committee s inquiry into this important matter. There is high and growing
More informationThe Commission invited respondents to comment on the The assumptions, conclusions, analysis and factual basis of the SH & E report.
Our Ref: PM/u pmdf\2001\1405011 4 th June 2001 Mr C Guiomard Head of Economic Affairs Commission for Aviation Regulation 36 Upper Mount Street Dublin 2 IRELAND Head Office Axis House 242 Bath Road Hayes
More informationSubmission by Heathrow Southern Railway Ltd.
Response to Consultation on core elements of the regulatory framework to support capacity expansion at Heathrow Submission by Heathrow Southern Railway Ltd. 22 nd September 2017 Contact; Steven Costello,
More informationGATWICK AIRPORT LIMITED,
3 SEPTEMBER 2015 The Secretary House of Commons Environmental Audit Committee Chair Palace of Westminster London SW1A 0AA By electronic transfer REF: AC-LGW-238 Dear Sir, Environmental Audit Committee
More informationRoad Investment Strategy A1 East of England Strategic Road Study
Road Investment Strategy 2020-2025 A1 East of England Strategic Road Study Report of the fourth meeting of the Stakeholder Reference Group March 2017 The fourth meeting of the A1 Stakeholder Reference
More information1. Summary of key points 2
Petitions Committee NEVAR petition: Cardiff Airport access road This brief sets out the history and policy background to the development of proposals for improved surface access to Cardiff Airport (CA).
More informationGuildford Borough Transport Strategy 2017, Topic Paper: Transport, June 2017 (accompanying Local Plan 2017) Local Plan Transport Strategy 2017
Guildford Society Transport Group Position Paper August 2017 Based on submissions in response to the June/July 2017 Local Plan consultation including material presented to Drop-in Session 15 July 2017.
More informationSurvey of Britain s Transport Journalists A Key Influencer Tracking Study Conducted by Ipsos MORI Results
Survey of Britain s Transport Journalists A Key Influencer Tracking Study Conducted by Ipsos MORI 2014 Results Methodology This report presents the findings of the 2014 study of Transport Journalists,
More informationASLEF s Response to the East Anglia Rail Franchise Consultation
ASLEF s Response to the East Anglia Rail Franchise Consultation 1. The Associated Society of Locomotive Engineers and Firemen (ASLEF) is the UK s largest train driver s union representing approximately
More informationThe future of airport capacity in Europe
The future of airport capacity in Europe Olivier Jankovec, Director General, ACI EUROPE Regional Airline Conference, Malta - 10 April 2008 Agenda The capacity crunch: an unavoidable reality What are the
More informationAirports Commission. Discussion Paper 04: Airport Operational Models. Response from the British Air Transport Association (BATA) June 2013
Airports Commission Discussion Paper 04: Airport Operational Models Response from the British Air Transport Association (BATA) June 2013 Introduction The British Air Transport Association (BATA) welcomes
More informationTeam London Bridge Response to the Department for Transport Consultation on the combined Thameslink, Southern and Great Northern franchise
Team London Bridge Response to the Department for Transport Consultation on the combined Thameslink, Southern and Great Northern franchise 23 August 2012 Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary 2. Introduction
More informationRe-opening of the Skipton to Colne Railway Executive Summary
Re-opening of the to Colne Railway Executive Summary SELRAP SELRAP is the East Lancashire Rail Action Partnership. It was established with the objective of campaigning for the reinstatement of the railway
More informationFUTURE AIRSPACE CHANGE
HEATHROW EXPANSION FUTURE AIRSPACE CHANGE UPDATE SEPTEMBER 2018 On 25 June 2018, Parliament formally backed Heathrow expansion, with MPs voting in support of the Government s Airports National Policy Statement
More informationA5-M1 Link (Dunstable Northern Bypass) Explanatory Statement
A5-M1 Link (Dunstable Northern Bypass) Explanatory Statement Broadway Broad Street Birmingham B15 1BL HIGHWAYS AGENCY A5-M1 LINK (DUNSTABLE NORTHERN BYPASS) EXPLANATORY STATEMENT Introduction The Highways
More informationOUTLINE RESPONSE FROM WELWYN PLANNING & AMENITYGROUP (WPAG) TO CONSULTATION OVER PROPOSED EXPANSION OF LUTON AIRPORT
OUTLINE RESPONSE FROM WELWYN PLANNING & AMENITYGROUP (WPAG) TO CONSULTATION OVER PROPOSED EPANSION OF LUTON AIRPORT This draft follows the format of the supplied response booklet. The contents have been
More informationA14 SCHEME - LAST CHANCE TO OBJECT
Issue 31 Brampton Parish Council Newsletter Autumn-Winter 2009 A14 SCHEME - LAST CHANCE TO OBJT First the bad news. Draft orders for the A14 scheme were issued on 30 Sep 09. The hatched areas in the scheme
More informationSurface Access. Position Statement on behalf of Stop Stansted Expansion
Doc. No. SSE/37 Case Ref. 2032278 Appeal by BAA Ltd and Stansted Airport Ltd following the refusal by Uttlesford District Council of planning application UTT/0717/06/FUL Surface Access Position Statement
More informationCHRISTCHURCH MOTORWAYS. Project Summary Statement February 2010
CHRISTCHURCH MOTORWAYS Project Summary Statement February 2010 Table of Contents 1. Purpose of Document 2. Strategic Context 3. Benefits 4. Project Scope and Economics 5. Implementation Plan 1 ROADS OF
More informationNational Airports and National Aviation Policy Statements. Key Factors 1. Noise: Markers from The Past 2. Carbon emissions: 3. Aircraft movements:
REPRESENTATION ON MANCHESTER AIRPORT GROUP/STANSTED AIRPORT LIMITED S PLANNING APPLICATION UTT/18/0460/FUL TO INCREASE STANSTED AIRPORT CAPACITY TO 43 MILLION PASSENGERS PER ANNUM (OR HIGHER) My representation
More informationCAA Passenger Survey Report 2005
Economic Regulation Group CAA Passenger Survey Report 2005 Survey of passengers at Aberdeen, Bournemouth, Durham Tees Valley, Edinburgh, Gatwick, Glasgow, Heathrow, Inverness, Leeds Bradford, Luton, Manchester,
More informationDraft airspace design guidance consultation
Draft airspace design guidance consultation Annex 2: CAP 1522 Published by the Civil Aviation Authority, 2017 Civil Aviation Authority Aviation House Gatwick Airport South West Sussex RH6 0YR You can copy
More informationLondon Luton Airport Vision for Sustainable Growth
London Airport Ltd A Luton Council company London Luton Airport Vision for Sustainable Growth 2020-2050 www.llal.org.uk Contents 03 I Foreword 04 I At a glance 06 I 01. Context 10 I 02. LTN s success 14
More informationTransport Infrastructure Construction and RMI Market Report - UK Analysis
Transport Infrastructure Construction and RMI Market Report - UK 2017-2021 Analysis Published: 19/12/2017 / Number of Pages: 60 / Price: 845.00 Introduction and Overview The 6th Edition of the 'Transport
More informationWokingham Borough Council Response to the Consultation on the Draft Airports National Policy Statement
Wokingham Borough Council Response to the Consultation on the Draft Airports National Policy Statement The consultation Draft Airports National Policy Statement (Draft NPS) sets out Government s policy
More informationLAMP 2 - FASI(S) Network
Future Airspace Strategy Implementation South: ATS Route Network managed by NERL under London Airspace Management Programme 2 LAMP 2 - FASI(S) Network Stage 1 Assessment Meeting Friday 23 rd February 2018
More informationREGION OF WATERLOO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT AIRPORT MASTER PLAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY MARCH 2017
REGION OF WATERLOO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT AIRPORT MASTER PLAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY MARCH 2017 Contact: Chris Wood, Airport General Manager cwood@regionofwaterloo.ca (519) 648-2256 ext. 8502 Airport Master
More informationBirmingham Airport 2033
Over the next 15 years, we will expand and improve the Airport to maximise our potential as a single runway airport by investing 500 million in new development. Our plans take account of our forecasted
More informationUNLOCKING THE BRIGHTON MAINLINE
UNLOCKING THE BRIGHTON MAINLINE The highly successful Coast to Capital region, which runs from South London to Brighton and across the coast to Chichester, needs significant long-term rail investment to
More informationAirport Operators Association National Needs Assessment: Call for evidence
Airport Operators Association National Needs Assessment: Call for evidence Introduction the need for aviation to grow across the UK 1. This response is submitted on behalf of the Airport Operators Association
More informationGatwick Airport s Assessment of Heathrow North-West Runway: Air Noise. July The world s leading sustainability consultancy
Gatwick Airport s Assessment of Heathrow North-West Runway: Air Noise July 2014 The world s leading sustainability consultancy AIR NOISE FINAL REPORT Gatwick Airport Assessment of Heathrow North-West Runway:
More informationHACAN ClearSkies. The Future Development of Air Transport in the United Kingdom: South East Consultation Documents
HACAN ClearSkies Heathrow Association for the Control of Aircraft Noise (HACAN ClearSkies) P.0. Box No. 339, TWICKENHAM, Middlesex, TW1 2XF www.hacan.org.uk The Future Development of Air Transport in the
More information