Matt Bator. Please be very clear on all the dimensions as the drawing does not give exact ht on 2nd story and no wdth on 1st story.

Transcription

1 Matt Bator Subject: FW: Spark arrester on 1110 Luneta From: Lynne Blakely Date: July 26, 2016 at 6:08:01 AM PDT To: Tom Blakely Subject: Spark arrester on 1110 Luneta Matt Make sure this photo is sent to all the DRB members. This spark arrestor was conveniently missing during applicant request for modification. Please be very clear on all the dimensions as the drawing does not give exact ht on 2nd story and no wdth on 1st story. Clarify for me and DRB whether wood burning or gas was permitted as both chimneys had same spark arrestor. Thanks Tom 1

2 2

3 LINDA EASLER 1110 LUNETA DR. DEL MAR, CA JULY 26, 2016 Matt Bator Senior Planner for the City of Del Mar (858) , Ext Dear Mr. Bator, I am writing you to summarize the history of the ongoing chimney issues relating to my neighbor, Mr. Tom Blakely. On March 4, 2014, Mr. Blakely voiced objections that our original chimney design on the south side of the second story roof infringed on his PRIMARY view corridor. He asked Jim Sneed to relocate the chimney to the North side so it would fall in the shadow of the distant tree. At this time, Mr. Blakely also requested that we make the west roof a hip instead of a gable so that it slopes away and out of his view. Both of his requests were accommodated so as not to disturb view corridors. On April 21, 2014, Mr. Blakely gave Jim Sneed along with Bob Scott his verbal support of these changes. On April 22, 2014, the Blakely s initialed the revised plans showing the chimney now sitting in the shadow of the tree and the roof line shorter than the previous house. On Aug, 1, 2015, Mr. Blakely came down to my property to complain to the building superintendent, Bud Huntzinger, about the proposed fireplace before the second story was even framed. He continued complaining about the fireplace prior to its framing for the next few months according to the contractors on the jobsite, showing his intent to fight the fireplace even after signing his approval.

4 We met with Mr. Blakely again on Feb. 18, 2016 and Mar 2, 2016 about the upstairs fireplace. We explained to him at that time that we changed the original field stone shown on the plans to a rounder river rock, which would be more bulbous and wider, but will not disturb his view as it will still be within the shadow of the tree. Mr. Blakely gave my contractor, Bob Dana, a pat on the back saying that everything looked good. At that time, we agreed with Mr. Blakely that we would keep the stone at a certain height to allow for a copper shroud to be placed on top. (This is the exact thing Blakely agreed and approved in his July 5, to you). The current story pole that is sitting atop the fireplace is showing our desire to increase the flue height, so as not to go through the added expense of a blower assembly. Sincerely, Linda Easler 1110 Luneta Dr, Del Mar, CA 2

5 Matt Bator From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: linda Tuesday, July 26, :14 AM Matt Bator Jim Sneed; FW: Easler/Blakely fireplace dispute Hi Matt, I was just curious why my side was not represented along with the agenda complaint letters for tomorrow s DRB hearing? Mr. Blakely had already sent you his written approval of the width of my chimney, as well as verbally approved it to both me and Bob Dana on several occasions, with a hand shake and pat on the back! He had also asked Jim Sneed to move the original placement of the fireplace, which was on the south side of the roof to the north side, so as NOT TO BE IN HIS PRIMARY VIEW CORRIDOR, and to make it sit in the shadow of the distant tree, which it still is despite the width. Via I recently (7/5) sent text to Linda Easler per request of Bob Dana as to finishing the chimneys. Rather than going to DMRB to bring the chimney to design spec, we decided to let them keep existing illegal structure on 2nd story at existing height which we agreed would be the top of white structure that currently exists above the stone. Then they can purchase a blower which was proposed by Dana to meet building codes eliminating any need for a spark arrestor or any tubing above the white structure. Finish with a copper wrap as proposed by Dana to complete the chimney. Chimney on lower roof would have a flat approx 5 spark arrestor placed on existing structure and also wrapped in copper as agreed. This will bring the structure closer to the original drawing approved by us and the town. I appreciate your assistance. Hopefully, all will go as agreed upon so we won t have to resort to revisiting the DMRB. Regards Tom Blakely Via Text: 1

6 I sent you gave the green light to go ahead and build the chimneys the way Dana described. Lynne and I decided not to Put you through the process and to avoid making you remove existing work. 2

7 3

8 Matt Bator From: Chris Jones < > Sent: Monday, July 25, :31 AM To: Matt Bator Cc: Tom Blakely Subject: Chimney Alterations at 1110 Luneta Dr. I am sending you this in total support of Tom Blakely's (1109 Luneta Dr.) objections to the major alterations to the design of the chimney on the construction at 1110 Luneta Dr. If the original "Story Poles" were correct, then this change is certainly not within the building permit issued by Del Mar. Such a major change to the permitted design should not be allowed, especially when it impacts someones view corridor. I would appreciate your serious review of this apparent permit violation. Thank you. Christopher Jones 1140 Cuchara Dr. Del Mar, CA

9 CITY OF DEL MAR PLANNING DEPARTMENT ITEM1 APN: ; 1110 LUNETA DR. LINDA EASLER AMOD ; MODIFICATION TO DRB-14-7 MODIFICATIONS INCLUDE REVISIONS TO HT, WDTH, MATERIALS As neighbors we feel the Bulk and Mass of the chimneys is significantly increased compared to the original design that was in the approved plan. The current chimney structures were knowingly built without regard to the DRB permit. When this was brought to the attention of the builder and owner numerous times during the various stages of construction they were dismissed until Matt Bator, Sr. Planner got involved. The 2 nd Story chimney which is 60% wider and 50% taller than the permitted one is in the primary view of the neighbor at 1109 Luneta Dr. significantly adding Bulk and Mass. The owner can still have a gas only fireplace using the permitted chimneys that were agreed to by all concerned parties before and during the permit process. The following Neighbors are not in favor of allowing the significant modifications to the original permit that was approved for the chimney(s). We want the DRB to deny the applicant request, and protect the integrity of the permit process. Rewarding someone for deliberately ignoring the process begs the question do we really have one.

10 NEIGI{BORS AGAINST TT{E 1I1O LUNETA DRIVE. CHIMNEY MODIFICATIONS: Name Address Signature 1. Ç la,r,, S',{erwq'n /t ts "i Lt'n í', þrt/4 { 2. l^^-"r-"t^' 3Rå-,* ltos L u^sta Dr 3. '/orl SfurrlY t/ô/ rtø/a J ll*o C"Jor"r Ùr o /\e> -t, { 4. r) \ Âc^ 5. 6 epcêlvn Êo á33* /tr++g- Þet ln Af- à luh-g-- "&>lous / t tt/ /r^.th)n 4// /r"f s/ Þ40 Yb^ 4/t /l oçrww,n UÌt*,yLts )Mrt-þJ s4õ //f Sf Þe /rtar izò u, ruîdlñç lt þ!,t, lo: f+ iltl M 12 1m> \t{^ * wwtr

11

12

13

14

15 From: To: Subject: Date: Jim Sneed; Re: Blakely"s responses to my chimney Tuesday, July 19, :29:37 PM I sent you gave the green light to go ahead and build the chimneys the way Dana described. Lynne and I decided not to Put you through the process and to avoid making you remove existing work. I recently (7/5) sent text to Linda Easler per request of Bob Dana as to finishing the chimneys. Rather than going to DMRB to bring the chimney to design spec, we decided to let them keep existing illegal structure on 2nd story at existing height which we agreed would be the top of white structure that currently exists above the stone. Then they can purchase a blower which was proposed by Dana to meet building codes eliminating any need for a spark arrestor or any tubing above the white structure. Finish with a copper wrap as proposed by Dana to complete the chimney. Chimney on lower roof would have a flat approx 5 spark arrestor placed on existing structure and also wrapped in copper as agreed. This will bring the structure closer to the original drawing approved by us and the town. I appreciate your assistance. Hopefully, all will go as agreed upon so we won t have to resort to revisiting the DMRB. Regards Tom Blakely From: Jim Sneed <jsneed@bokalandsneed.com>

16 Date: Monday, July 11, 2016 at 9:20 AM To: Linda Easler Cc: Bob Dana Caroline Curry Subject: DRB I guess we had a shit storm with Blakely. The DRB will be on the 27 th. Can you send a copy of what the lawyer sent? Do you want the lawyer to be a part of the DRB presentation? JS FYI we have waived all fees. So sorry for all of this.

17 Matt Bator Subject: FW: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) From: Carl Winston < > Date: July 21, 2016 at 12:01:27 PM PDT Subject: New home project at 1110 Luneta Dr Hello Del Mar Planner, We have learned that the home at 11th and Luneta is knowingly building a chimney not approved by DRB that adds bulk & mass while blocking views, ETC. We are also building two homes at th Street and wonder if we too can not follow the approved plans. (Just kidding, but hopefully you get my point.) Do you all just let this happen? Why? Carl Winston th St Del Mar. 1

18 Matt Bator From: Ted Shank < Sent: Thursday, July 21, :35 PM To: Matt Bator Subject: Re: Howard Gad project at 1525 Luneta To: Del Mar Design Review Board and Matt Bator Mr. Gad has certainly made improvements since the first design of this project. However, so far as I can see past the bushes which he refuses to cut, the project still encroaches on the view from my Living Room. The bushes I suppose are intended to hide the flags and poles. One can only see what is intended by walking up the driveway to see from an angle the flags and poles that are behind the bushes. The project is still very large (6,000 sq ft). I don't know if it looms over Luneta. Sincerely, Ted Shank 1

19 July 22,2016 City of Del Mar Design Review Board c/o Joseph Smith 2010 Jimmy Durante Boulevard, Suite #120 DelMar, CA92O14 RE Project DRB , 2004 Ocean Front RECEIVED JUL 2??016 CITY OF DELMAR PI.ANNING DEPARTMENT Dear Design Review Board members. I am writing in response to a letter received from the Herricks regarding the proposed house at 2004 Ocean Front. The Herricks were concerned about the affect of the house on their views to the west from their master bedroom and roof deck. I spoke to Mr. Herrick regarding the house and explained that the location of the house on the lot is extremely limited due to the lot's substandard size and setbacks. I also explained that lowering the house would not improve their views, since it is the location of the house that is affecting them. Perhaps most importantly, the views discussed are not from their primary living area/primary view, and as such are not protected under the DRO. While our preference would be to accommodate everyone's concerns, in this case, we really don't have a viable alternative to the location of the second floor. I will be stopping by the Herrick's house on Monday to discuss the matter in person and see the views from their master bedroom and roof deck. Based on my understanding of the configuration of their house, I do not think any adjustments to the proposed design would be particularly helpful to them or necessary based on the DRO regarding primary scenic views. Based on input from the Planning Commission, and the neighbors, we have tried very hard to minimize the second floor area, and have made specific adjustments to improve the views from the Duckett's house to the east (where the proposed house can see the house from a primary scenic view). We have also taken great care to carve away the corners of the second floor to maximize diagonal views across the site. Unfortunately, we do not have any options that can solve all the issues while still allowing the owners to create a home of appropriate scale and equal quality to the other houses in the neighborhood. I will follow up again next week, should we discover any other solutions upon visiting the Herricks house next Tuesday. Thank you, Brian Church AIA

20 RECEIVED JUL t6 Juty 7, 2016 City of De[ Mar Design Review Board c/o Joseph Smith 2010 Jimmy Durante Boutevard, Suite #120 DelMaç C CITY OF DEL MAR PLANNING DEPARTMENT Dear Desig n Review Board members and I live 4 Cou þ I am writing this letter in l, a new two story house at 2004 Ocean Front. We have reviewed the house ptans and the story potes for the proposed house, and look forward to this improvement to our neighborhood. Thank you for your time and consideration. RECÉ VE.Ð lul Admini3iiTrii'Ds1 'Yål' o u o'

21 RECEIVED July 20th.201ó Mr, Anthony J. Verano. Jr JUL 21 20t6 2fi)4 Ocean Front Lane Del Mar. Califomia "*filil3i3,i*hè,, RE: Þesign Plans for?0o4 Ocean Front Lane Dea Mr. V rano: I am thc duly authorizod rçpresentative of the Duckctl Family, the owners of thc propelics located at 2001 Occan Front Lane and 2008 Ocean Front Lane. Del Mar. Celifornie. Borh propert es are adjaccnt to 2004 Oscan Front Lane. I am writing concerning the design plans for a new home to be constructed on the pmperty. I appreciate your efforts to not fl' me of your intentions, sharing with me thc building dcsign plens" end mætinß with me to review them. I was glad to have the opportunity to providc you with my thoughts about how the project might impact the Ducken propcrties and pleased thar you have consídcrcd my comments and concerns in a positive mânri r. I have reviewed the revised plans you have provided rne shou'ing, the comparison with üre original plans. The elcvction you hrve providcd indisstes you arc amenable lo lowering the plantcr arca and moving the deck roof frnmc north to align with the house. in accordance wirh the existing ten fool ret-back. Based on these changes I will give my conscnt to and approval of the plans. By copy of this letter. with the revisßd plans attacheú I am natiþing the Ilcsign Review Bosrd of såme. Pleasc acknowlcdgc your agrcement wilh thc above and confìrm drat ths revised plans I havc rcviewed be the plüs submined to üre Board for approval. I wish you luck with the new home and bslieve it be an åttmctivc addition to the neighborhood and enhance both thc esthstics and velues of all of our will will pfopcft es. Vcry Ric CC: Design Review Board Copy aneched.

22 h Smith From: Sent: To: Subject: Brian Chu rch < brianchurcharchitecture.com > Tuesday, July 26,2016 3:31 PM Joseph Smith FW: This is the letter I put in the mail. Joseph, The neighbor two doors down to the north (Dave Sykes) mailed a letter to you. I am copying the below, in case you haven't received the hard copy in the mail. Brian Church AIA Brian Church Architecture (8s8) RECEIVED JUL 26 20ffi ",füii3;3fffi* From: Tony Varano Sent: Sund-ay, July 24,2016 9:57 AM To: 'Brian Church' Subject: FW: This is the letter I put in the mail Same with Dave Sykes From: Dave Sykes' Sent: Sunday, February 28,2OL6 f:o PN To: Tony Varano Subject: This is the letter I put in the mail This is the letter I put in the mail Dave Sykes February 27,2016 City of Del Mar Del Mar Planning Commission 1050 Camino Del Mar CA Del Mar CA920I4 Dear Planning Commission: I

23 I live two homes down the beach on the north side from subject property and wanted to express to you my support for Tony Varano's variance to allow construction of his new two story home to five feet (5') from his property line. All of our homes on the beach have our homes built five feet (5') from our property lines. Also, I have walked the area and many homes have their building structures 5' from their property lines that are next to the beach access. Our beach home lots are very small and we need to maximize the available space to create a functional, livable and neighborhood friendly home. I believe that Tony Varano should be afforded the same courtesy as the rest of the community. If he has overwhelming support from our neighborhood, why would the planning commission exert their preference onto his building prospects? The home that exists in the lot today is an eye sore and has building structures that are built less than five feet (5') from the property line. I want to see a new quality home built that improves the community and improves my personal quality of life. Tony Varano should be granted the right to build a new quality two story home that has living space on both floors which is twenty five (25') side to side on his lot. Please grant him a variance to allow this. Thank you. Dave Sykes 2076 Ocean Front Del Mal CA920I4 irlii"îlli 9l!)l - ccll 2

24 -----Original Message----- From: Ann Gay Sent: Tuesday, July 26, :28 AM To: Scott MacDonald rick ehrenfeld Subject: Re: DRB 1970 Zapo Thank you for visiting the site yesterday. I want to clarify an answer to one of your questions: you asked if they can see in to the master bedroom from their property and I said no. But to be clear if the existing fence height is not maintained they will be able to see in to the area between our master bath and master bedroom from some parts of their property. Ann Gay akg@roadrunner.com=

25

26

27 From: Beth Sutter Sent: Monday, July 25, :55 PM To: Shaun McMahon Subject: Revised Design Review Board c/o Shaun McMahon, Assistant Planner City of Del Mar Revised Re: APN Zapo Street Dear Design Review Board Members I am the homeowner of an adjacent property, 1986 Zapo Street, directly east (behind) the applicants property. The main concerns that I would like to address are listed below B/D Currently our neighborhood homes are terraced, thus decreasing the bulk and mass appearance. So this proposal has a straight vertical facade at street level, increasing the appearance of bulk and mass D. Privacy. The master bedroom and bath planned are directly in front of the main living area of my home. Would like to be assured that frosted windows be installed for respective occupants privacy landscaping The trees proposed on the north side of Zapo Thornless Palo Verde (4) feet tree height Icee Blue Podecarpus all along west and east property 25 feet tree height While both types of trees are attractive, my concern is they will further impede my view. Landscaping, especially trees, but also other plantings. I would like there to be an agreement in place that in the future, trees and plantings will not be placed to obstruct the reduced view that I have with the construction of this new home. Respectfully Beth Sutter Allen 1986 Zapo Street Del Mar Bethsutter777@gmail.com

28 City of Del Mar TO: FROM: Design Review Board Members and Interested Parties Shaun McMahon, Management Analyst DATE: July 27, 2016 RE: Updated Draft Minutes ( ) Board Members: Please see the attached copy of the draft minutes which reflect changes sent in by two Board Members. If you have any questions, or see additional items which need to be amended, please contact me at your earliest convenience. Enclosure: Updated Draft Minutes 1050 Camino Del Mar, Del Mar, California Telephone: (858) Fax: (858)

29 MINUTES Del Mar Design Review Board Meeting Wednesday, June 22, 2016 Del Mar Communications Center 240 Tenth Street, Del Mar, California The minutes set forth the actions taken by the Design Review Board on the matters stated. Audio/video recordings of the Design Review Board proceedings are retained for a period of ten years, in accordance with the City s Records Retention Schedule. Audio/video recordings, as well as written materials presented to the Design Review Board, including Red Dots (materials provided to the Design Review Board after the agenda was published), are available on the City s website at or by contacting the Administrative Services Department at (858) CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL 6:04 P.M. All members were present except Board Member Levine. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Board approved the minutes, as amended. STAFF UPDATE None. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS None. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD/STAFF DISCUSSION None. DISCUSSION AND BRIEFING ON APPLICATION ITEMS Senior Planner Matt Bator shared that Items 2, 7 and 8 are eligible for Consent. Items 4 through 6 were continued, date certain, to the July meeting of the DRB. CONSENT CALENDAR Chairman Curtis opened Items 2, 7 and 8 to public comment, there were no speakers. Board Member Haviland asked that Item 7 be heard. Board Member Michalsky expressed concern about the proposed lighting plans on both Items 2 and 8 and proposed a

30 DEL MAR DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MINUTES JUNE 22, 2016 PAGE 2 subcommittee on lighting for both Items. Board Member Ehrenfeld recused himself on Item 8 due to the proximity of his home. IT WAS MOVED BY BOARD MEMBER MACDONALD, SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER HAVILAND, TO APPROVE ITEMS 2 AND 8, SUBJECT TO SUBCOMMITTEES ON LIGHTING FOR BOTH ITEMS, CONSISTING OF BOARD MEMBERS MICHALSKY AND HAVILAND, ON CONSENT. MOTION PASSED 5-1-1, WITH BOARD MEMBER EHRENFELD RECUSED AND BOARD MEMBER LEVINE ABSENT. ITEM 2 DRB16-004, CDP16-004, FDP APN: Location: 2722 Camino del Mar Applicants/Owners: Lori and Steve Poleshuk Agent: Bokal and Sneed Architects Zone: R1-5B Environmental Status: Exempt Contact Person: Rick Casswell, Associate Planner Description: A request for Design Review and Coastal Development Permits to demolish a one-story, single-family residence and construct a new (replacement) twostory, single- family residence, detached garage, and perform associated landscaping and site improvements. Board approved the Item, on consent. ITEM 8 DRB16-021, LC APN: Location: 920 & 922 Stratford Ct. Owners: Real Freedom LLC. Applicant: Bokal and Sneed Architects Zone: R2 Environmental Status: Exempt Overlay Contact Person: Shaun McMahon, Assistant Planner Description: A request for a Design Review Permit and Land Conservation Permit to: 1) add new privacy walls between the two existing units; 2) extend previously approved privacy screens on the second-floor balconies; 3) install one new direct vent fireplace; 4) install two new outdoor showers; 5) install new

31 DEL MAR DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MINUTES JUNE 22, 2016 PAGE 3 exterior lighting; 6) change the existing roof cap resulting in a 3-4 inch increase in the roof height; and 7) construct and install multiple hardscape improvements including new planters, BBQ areas, retaining walls, a new trash enclosure and new fencing. Board approved the Item, on consent. CONTINUED APPLICATION(S) ITEM 1 DRB13-26, CDP 13-09, LC13-09, TRP APN: Location: Vacant lot on Hidden Pines Road Applicant/Owner: Pieter Van Rooyen Agent: Dean Meredith, Architect Zone: R1-10 Environmental Status: Exempt Contact Person: Matt Bator, AICP, Senior Planner Description: A request for a Design Review, Coastal Development, and Land Conservation Permits to construct a new twostory single-family residence on an undeveloped lot. Associated site improvements would include outdoor decks, patios, planter areas, driveway and pedestrian access, and associated grading. The request includes the removal of three (3) Torrey Pine trees to accommodate the proposed development. Senior Planner Matt Bator provided the staff report with a PowerPoint Presentation. Board asked clarifying questions. It was disclosed that Board Members visited the site and the neighborhood, and some met with the architect. Pieter Van Rooyen, Applicant, and Dean Meredith, Architect, provided their presentation. Chariman Curtis opened the Item to public comment and the following people spoke:

32 DEL MAR DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MINUTES JUNE 22, 2016 PAGE 4 Rich Heyman, 264 Torrey Pines Terrace. Chairman Curtis closed the Item to public comment. Dean Meredith, Architect, provided the rebuttal. Board discussed the Item. Board expressed concerns about the lighting plan, expressing concerns with the number of fixtures and the proposed bulbs. They proposed a subcommittee on the issue. They expressed appreciation for efforts to preserve trees on the property. Some members suggested that concerns about light from the skylight are largely unfounded. Board suggested that efforts be made to minimize soil removal consistent with the DRO. There was general support for the proposed geological monitoring. There was some disagreement regarding whether an effort should be made to preserve more of the trees on the property. There was also some disagreement as to whether or not the mass of the project poses a DRO violation. Members suggested that dropping the height in the basement may sufficiently reduce the mass. There was some concern that this would result in significant soil removal. Board continue the Item, date certain, to the July meeting of the DRB, asking for revisions to lower the proposal in an effort to reduce mass, as well as to address concerns on lighting. NEW APPLICATION(S) ITEM 3 DRB16-010, CDP APN: Location: 1640 Stratford Way Applicants/Owners: The Scheele Family Trust Agent: Bokal and Sneed Architects Zone: R1-10 Environmental Status: Exempt Contact Person: Rick Casswell, Associate Planner Description: A request for Design Review and Coastal Development Permits to demolish a two-story, single-family residence with attached garage, and construct a new (replacement) two-story, single-family residence,

33 DEL MAR DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MINUTES JUNE 22, 2016 PAGE 5 with attached garage, and perform associated landscaping improvements. Rick Casswell, City Associate Planner, provided the staff report with a PowerPoint Presentation. Board disclosed that members visited the site and spoke with neighbors. Bob Scott, Architect, provided a presentation on the Item. Board asked clarifying questions. Chairman Curtis opened the Item to public comment and the following people spoke: Charles Brenton, Luneta Drive Catherine Brenton, Luneta Drive Chairman Curtis closed the Item to public comment. Bob Scott, Applicant Representative, provided his rebuttal. Board discussed the Item. Board expressed concern about the late hour of the Red Dot Correspondence given the difficulty it presented to the Board to verify the concerns expressed. Those who were able to visit the Brenton home suggested that the viewtake was not significant, especially given the location of the white water views relative to the home and that tree removal will open up views. Board asked for extension of the landscape to screen the outdoor stairway. Board suggested that the landscaping plan include a caveat that planting materials be designed to not grow higher than the house. Board expressed some concerns about lighting. Board Member Ehrenfeld abstained on the Item based on insufficient information. IT WAS MOVED BY BOARD MEMBER HAVILAND, SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER MACDONALD, TO APPROVE THE ITEM WITH THE CONDITION OF

34 DEL MAR DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MINUTES JUNE 22, 2016 PAGE 6 INCREASED LANDSCAPING TO SCREEN THE OUTDOOR STAIRWAY AND THAT LANDSCAPING NOT BE OF A SPECIES WHICH WILL GROW BEYOND THE HEIGHT OF THE BUILDING, AND WITH THE ADDITION OF A SUBCOMMITTEE ON LIGHTING. MOTION PASSED , WITH BOARD MEMBER EHRENFELD ABSTAINING, AND BOARD MEMBER LEVINE ABSENT. Board nominated Board Member Michalsky and Board Member Haviland to the subcommittee on lighting. ITEM 4 DRB APN: Location: 1201 Camino Del Mar Applicant: Prep Kitchen Del Mar LLC Agent: Arturo Kassel Owner: George Conkright Zone: CC Environmental Status: Exempt Contact Person: Breann Guzman, Planning Intern Description: A request for a Design Review Permit to: 1) extend the current trellis over the exposed portion of Prep Kitchen s patio; 2) install a weatherproof fabric overhead; and 3) to maintain their oversized logos. Item was continued, date certain, to the July meeting of the DRB. ITEM 5 DRB APN: Location: 725 Amphitheater Drive Applicants/Owners: Rick Ray Zone: R1-10 Environmental Status: Exempt Contact Person: Breann Guzman, Planning Intern Description: A request for a Design Review Permit to: 1) raise the roof entry way to the existing ridge height; 2) upgrade the existing fac ade to stone veneer and manufactured shingle siding; and 3) to replace the existing roof materials with new composition shingles. Item was continued, date certain, to the July meeting of the DRB.

35 DEL MAR DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MINUTES JUNE 22, 2016 PAGE 7 ITEM 6 DRB16-016, LC APN: Location: 2104 Christy Lane Applicants/Owners: Melody Bacha Agent: Brian Church Zone: R1-10 Environmental Status: Exempt Contact Person: Matt Bator, AICP, Senior Planner Description: A request for Design Review Permit to construct a new, detached, 493 square-foot patio enclosure with a wood burning fireplace, BBQ area, bathroom, retaining walls, and exterior lighting. A Land Conservation Permit is requested for site grading associated with the proposed patio enclosure. Item was continued, date certain, to the July meeting of the DRB. RECESS AND CALL TO ORDER: 8:15 PM ITEM 7 DRB APN: Location: 1005 Stratford Ct. Owners: Ethel Grant Applicant: Don Countryman Zone: R2 Environmental Status: Exempt Contact Person: Shaun McMahon, Assistant Planner Description: A request for a Design Review Permit to convert a portion of the existing roof to a new roof deck and install one new spiral staircase at the site of an existing one-story single-family home. Board Member Ehrenfeld was recused on the Item. Board disclosed that all members received and read the staff report, visited the site, met with neighbors. Board identified potential issues, to include lack of harmony with the surrounding neighborhood in particular regarding the deck plans. Don Countryman, Hyland Drive, Solana Beach, provided a presentation on the Item.

36 DEL MAR DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MINUTES JUNE 22, 2016 PAGE 8 Chairman Curtis opened the Item to public comment. There were no speakers. Board discussed the Item. Most members felt that no DRO violations exist. Other members felt that the deck and the affiliated staircase are incongruous with the home and surrounding neighborhood. There was a suggestion that use of the deck may pose a privacy issue. It was suggested that there be a discussion Item at a future meeting regarding roof decks. IT WAS MOVED BY CHAIRMAN CURTIS, SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER MACDONALD, TO APPROVE THE ITEM. MOTION PASSED , WITH BOARD MEMBER HAVILAND OPPOSED, BOARD MEMBER EHRENFELD RECUSED, AND BOARD MEMBER LEVINE ABSENT. ADJOURNMENT 8:56 P.M. Chairman Curtis adjourned the meeting at 8:56 P.M. Shaun McMahon, Assistant Planner