BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS -AGENDA- Thursday, October 5, 2017 at 7:00 P.M.

Transcription

1 BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS -AGENDA- Thursday, October 5, 2017 at 7:00 P.M. Louis J.R. Goorey Worthington Municipal Building The John P. Coleman Council Chamber 6550 North High Street Worthington, Ohio A. Call to Order - 7:00 pm 1. Roll Call 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Approval of minutes of the September 7, 2017 meeting 4. Affirmation/swearing in of witnesses B. Unfinished Business 1. Variance Sign Requirements - Mural 455 E. Wilson Bridge Rd. (Jim Saltz/Yappy Greek) BZA C. Items of Public Hearing New 1. Variance Side Yard Setback 5671 Indianola Dr. (Emma Lindholm) BZA Variance Sign Requirements Face Replacement 510 High St. (Signarama Worthington) BZA D. Other E. Adjournment 374 HIGHLAND AVE. WORTHINGTON, OHIO (614)

2 September 27, 2017 To: Members of the Board of Zoning Appeals From: Don Phillips, Chief Building Inspector Subject: Staff Comments for the Meeting of October 5, 2017 B. Items of Public Hearing - Unfinished 1. Variance Signage Mural 455 E. Wilson Bridge Rd. (Jim Saltz/Yappy Greek) BZA Findings of fact: 1. This property is in the C-1 district where each business is permitted 1 wall mounted sign. A sign is permitted only 4 colors including black and white. Temporary signs are not permitted in this district. 2. A sign is any device, structure, material or combination of these intended to advertise or draw attention to such items as business names, organization names, real estate, buildings or structures, products, services or entertainment. 3. The applicant is proposing to paint an 8 foot by 8 foot mural on the east side of the building. The mural is intended to draw attention to the Greek restaurant in the building, and is a sign by definition. The requested variance is to allow a second wall mounted sign with more than 4 colors. 4. The Division of Building Regulation has had compliance problems with this property in general, and this tenant in particular. From November 24, 2004 until July 28, 2017, a total of 24 investigations have been pursued, mostly violations of Chapter 1170 Signs, including 1 case corrected after a complaint was filed in Worthington Mayors Court in An investigations report for this property is enclosed for your use. 5. The violation in the investigation opened on May 2, 2017 was recently corrected after the tenant was advised the Board may not grant a variance if they are in violation. It will remain open for at least another 30 days should a complaint in Worthington Mayors Court be warranted.

3 6. The granting of these 2 variances does not grant variances from other requirements of Chapter 1170 Signs. 7. Staff has not found any violatons of Chapter 1170 since August 9, The following conclusions are presented: 1. The requested variance is not substantial, and is more decorative than a traditional sign. 2. The essential character of the neighborhood should not be substantially altered. 3. The delivery of governmental services should not be affected. The following motion is recommended: THAT THE REQUEST BY JIM SALTZ, YAPPY GREEK, AND CAPITAL ENTERPRISES FOR A VARIANCE FROM CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR SIGNAGE TO ALLOW A MURAL AT 455 EAST WILSON BRIDGE ROAD, AS PER CASE NO. BZA 28-17, DRAWINGS NO. BZA DATED JULY 7, 2017, BE APPROVED, BASED ON THE FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS IN THE STAFF MEMO AND/OR PRESENTED AT THE MEETING. C. Items of Public Hearing - New 1. Variance Side Yard Setback Fence 5671 Indianola Ave. (Emma Lindholm) BZA Findings of fact: 1. This property is an existing lot of record in the R-10 district where the front yard setback requirement is 30 feet. Corner lots are permitted to reduce the adjacent setback to 20 feet. Fencing is not permitted between the right-of-way and the building setback line. Fencing within 10 feet of the right-of-way cannot exceed 2 foot 6 inches above the street grade. 2. The Indianola Avenue right-of-way is 80 feet wide. The Park Boulevard right-of-way is 60 feet. The grade rises approximately approximately 18 inches above the Park Boulevard street grade at the property line. 3. The applicant is proposing to erect a 6 foot tall fence along the Park Boulevard right-ofway. The requested variance are 20 feet for side yard setback and a approximately 66 inches for fence height. The following conclusions are presented: 1. The wider than typical right-of-way encroaches onto this property an additional 5 feet, compounding the practical difficulties of a narrow lot at an intersection. Additionally, Park Boulevard was constructed south of the center of the right-of-way, creating even more lawn area between the curb and the right-of-way, futher mititigating the substantial side yard setback variance. BZA staff memo for the October 5, 2017 Meeting Page 2 of 4

4 2. The Board typically seeks a 4 foot tall or open style 6 foot tall fence when encroaching into the side yard, but in this particular case, the proposed fence is at the back of the existing dwelling, and should not impact intersection sight lines compared to similar fences at other intersections in the district. This mitigates the substantial fence height variance request. 3. The essential character of the neighborhood should not be substantially altered. 4. The delivery of governmental services should not be affected. The following motion is recommended: THAT THE REQUEST BY EMMA LINDHOLM FOR A VARIANCE FROM CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR SIDE YARD SETBACK AND FENCE HEIGHT TO ERECT A FENCE AT 5671 INDIANOLA AVENUE, AS PER CASE NO. BZA 36-17, DRAWINGS NO. BZA DATED SEPTEMBER 8, 2017, BE APPROVED, BASED ON THE FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS IN THE STAFF MEMO AND/OR PRESENTED AT THE MEETING. 2. Variance Sign Requirements Face Replacement 510 High St. (Signarama Worthington) BZA Findings of fact: 1. This property is in the C-1 district where signs are permitted 2 styles of lettering plus one logo. 2. The applicant is proposing to replace the sign face of an existing freestanding sign. The new sign face includes 3 styles of lettering plus a logo. The requested variance is 1 additonal lettering style. 3. The property is subject to, and the sign face has been approved by, the Architectural Review Board. The following conclusions are presented: 1. The requested variance is not substantial. 2. The essential character of the neighborhood should not be substantially altered. 3. The delivery of governmental services should not be affected. The following motion is recommended: THAT THE REQUEST BY SIGNARAMA WORTHINGTON AND U A GROUP LTD FOR A VARIANCE FROM CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR SIGNAGE TO REPLACE THE SIGN FACE AT 510 HIGH STREET, AS PER CASE NO. BZA 37-17, DRAWINGS NO. BZA DATED SEPTEMBER 19, 2017, BE APPROVED, BASED ON THE BZA staff memo for the October 5, 2017 Meeting Page 3 of 4

5 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS IN THE STAFF MEMO AND/OR PRESENTED AT THE MEETING. Reference Portions of Section (c) Area Variances. The Board shall have the power to hear and decide appeals and authorize variances from the provisions or requirements of this Zoning Ordinance. In authorizing a variance, the Board may attach conditions and require such guarantee or bond as it may deem necessary to assure compliance with the objective of this Zoning Ordinance. The Board may grant a variance in the application of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance when it is determined that practical difficulty exists based on the following factors: (1) Whether the property in question will yield a reasonable return or whether there can be any beneficial use of the property without the variance; (2) Whether the variance is substantial; (3) Whether the essential character of the neighborhood would be substantially altered or whether adjoining properties would suffer a substantial detriment as a result of the variance; (4) Whether the variance would adversely affect the delivery of governmental services (e.g. water, sewer, garbage). (5) Whether the property owner purchased the property with knowledge of the zoning restriction; (6) Whether the property owner s predicament feasibly can be obviated through some method other than a variance; and, (7) Whether the spirit and intent behind the zoning requirement would be observed and substantial justice done by granting the variance. BZA staff memo for the October 5, 2017 Meeting Page 4 of 4

6 A. Call to Order 7:00 p.m. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS September 9, Roll Call - the following members were present: M. Coulter; B. Seitz; D. Falcoski; and C. Crane. Also present were D. Phillips, Chief Building Inspector; and L. Brown, Director of Planning and Building. 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Approval of minutes of the August 3, Mr. Coulter moved to approve the minutes, seconded by Mr. Seitz. All members voted aye and the minutes were approved. 4. Affirmation/swearing in of witnesses. B. Items of Public Hearing Unfinished 1. Temporary Use Permit Food Truck 885 High St. (Eat Now) BZA Withdrawn by applicant 2. Variance Side Yard Setback Garage Replacement 275 Loveman Ave. (Janice Wilson & Terry Agler) BZA Mr. Phillips reviewed the staff memo: Findings of fact: 1. This property is an existing lot of record in the R-10 district where detached accessory buildings larger than 120 square feet in area must be setback a minimum of 8 feet from the side property line. 2. The property had an existing detached garage that was recently demolished. 3. The applicant is proposing to construct a new 24 foot by 24 foot detached garage, 7 feet from the east property line. The requested variance is 1 foot. The following conclusions are presented: 1. Existing lots of records tend to be smaller than those found in the district, creating practical difficulties when building detached structures and maintaining a usable rear yard. In this particular case, the lot is only 50 feet wide compared to 80 feet typically found in the district. The garage is being replaced and widened.

7 Shifting it to the west would make it more difficult to maneuver a vehicle into the west stall. 2. The essential character of the neighborhood should not be substantially altered. 3. The delivery of governmental services should not be affected. Discussion: Janice Wilson, 275 Loveman Avenue, said she was with her husband Terry Alger. Mr. Coulter asked if the edge of the garage would be in the same position as before and Mr. Phillips replied no, the site plan shows the garage will be seven feet from the property line which is further away. Ms. Crane asked if there was anyone to speak for or against this proposal. Motion: Mr. Seitz moved: THAT THE REQUEST BY JANICE WILSON AND TERRY AGLER FOR A VARIANCE FROM CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR SIDE YARD SETBACK TO CONSTRUCT A GARAGE AT 275 LOVEMAN AVENUE, AS PER CASE NO. BZA 23-17, DRAWINGS NO. BZA DATED JULY 3, 2017, BE APPROVED, BASED ON THE FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS IN THE STAFF MEMO AND/OR PRESENTED AT THE MEETING. Mr. Falcoski seconded the motion. All members voted aye and the motion was approved. C. Items of Public Hearing - New 1. Extension of Construction Completion Period Single Family Dwelling 410 Tucker Dr. (The Arcaro & LaRussa Co./Bakhshi) BZA Findings of fact: 1. Building Permit was issued on January 26, 2016 to construct an approximately 19,426 square foot single family dwelling on the property. The permit expired on July 26, Plumbing Permit 8097 was issued on August 23, Mechanical Permit 2156 was issued on April 6, An Electrical Permit has not been issued. 2. The certificate of phased plan approval was last issued on October 5, Design work to be completed includes the retaining walls, the thermal envelope, the fireplaces, the swimming pool, fuel gas piping system, and the electrical system. Page 2 of 11 BZA Meeting September 9, 2017 Minutes

8 3. The last inspection we have on file was of the rough plumbing on March 31, It would be reasonable for the Board to grant an additional year to complete construction. The following conclusions are presented: 1. This particular dwelling is much larger and more complicated than a typical dwelling. In addition its sheer size which includes a full basement even under the attached garage, the dwelling structure uses a mixture of wood, structural steel, concrete over metal deck, and floor trusses. 2. It would not be in public interest to not allow the construction to continue. Discussion: Rodney Arcaro, 362 East Granville Road, said he is the builder for the Bakhshi family. He said it is in everyone s best interest to finish this project and if the Board approves the extension of time he believes construction would resume within two weeks. Ms. Crane asked when the last time any work had been done on the site and Mr. Arcaro replied this past April. Mr. Coulter asked when the house would be finished and Mr. Arcaro said if there are no more delays he anticipated the house would be completed by June Ms. Crane asked if there was anyone to speak for or against this application. Mary Dillhoff, 430 Tucker Drive, said finishing this house is in everybody s best interest. She asked to have the applicant make sure they mow their grass and would like to have the portable toilet moved to a less conspicuous location. Ms. Crane asked if that is something the Board members can require from the applicant and Mr. Phillips replied, no, that issue is between the two property owners. Robert Bornstein, 495 Tucker Drive, said he is new to the neighborhood and have not moved in yet, but their house is close by. He asked what assurances there are that progress will be made because he does not want to see the home in the same incomplete condition it is now in another year. Mr. Phillips said there was a house a few years ago that took three and a half years to be built. The home was smaller than this house, but the homeowner was building the house himself. Anthony Hahn, 399 Highgate Avenue, said he lives behind the back yard of the Bakhshi family. He wanted to echo Mrs. Dillhoff s comments and realizes there is not much the Board can do. He is aware there are liens on the house and was concerned if contractors would still be working on the house with unpaid liens. Cheryl Evans, 360 Tucker Drive, said she is concerned about safety and felt the property is hazardous now and if work does not begin soon, something should be done to secure the house. She would like the six foot weeds to be removed because that is all she sees Page 3 of 11 BZA Meeting September 9, 2017 Minutes

9 when she pulls out of her driveway. Mr. Phillips said the City s Service and Engineer department pursues all noxious weed and tall grass complaints and he advised Ms. Evans to call their office. Rodney Arcaro said he agrees with all of the comments that were made and said he stipulated in order to begin building that the silt fence and erosion control should be addressed first. He is waiting for a few things to be resolved and then he can move forward. He had no problem moving the portable toielt. Motion: Mr. Coulter moved: THAT THE REQUEST BY THE ARCARO AND LARUSSA COMPANY, AND AARON AND SUSAN BAKHSHI FOR AN EXTENSION OF THE CONSTRUCTION COMPLETION PERIOD FOR ONE YEAR TO CONSTRUCT A DWELLING AT 410 TUCKER DRIVE, AS PER CASE NO. BZA 29-17, DRAWINGS NO. BZA DATED JULY 17, 2017, BE APPROVED, BASED ON THE FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS IN THE STAFF MEMO AND/OR PRESENTED AT THE MEETING. Mr. Seitz seconded the motion. All members voted aye and the motion was approved. 2. Variance Accessory Building Area & Side Yard Setback Garage & Window Wells 595 Fox Ln. (Robert & Deborah Tucker) BZA Mr. Phillips reviewed the staff memo: Findings of fact: 1. This property is an existing lot of record in the R-10 district where total accessory structure area is limited to 850 square feet, and the minimum side yard requirement is 6 feet. 2. The applicant is proposing to construct a new dwelling with a 24 foot by 38 foot attached garage. The proposed garage is 912 square feet. The requested variance is 62 square feet. 3. The applicant is also proposing the dwelling be constructed 6.39 feet from the north property line with 3, 5 foot 4 inch by approximately 4 foot 9 inch window wells along the north side of the dwelling, approximately 1.64 feet from the north property line. The requested variance is approximately 4.36 feet. Page 4 of 11 BZA Meeting September 9, 2017 Minutes

10 The following conclusions are presented: 1. The requested additional accessory building area is not significant. 2. Existing lots of record create practical difficulties when attempting to construct dwellings. In this particular case, the lot is only feet wide whereas 80 feet is typical for the district. If the lot were the minimum width, no variance would be required. The requested side yard variance is not substantial. 2. The essential character of the neighborhood should not be substantially altered. 3. The delivery of governmental services should not be affected. Discussion: Robert Tucker, 595 Fox Lane, said he spoke with the neighbors next door about the window wells and they do not have any problems or concerns. Mr. Coulter asked if the window wells were for egress and Mr. Tucker replied, potentially. Ms. Crane asked if there was anyone to speak for or against this application. Motion: Mr. Falcoski moved: THAT THE REQUEST BY ROBERT AND DEBORAH TUCKER FOR A VARIANCE FROM CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR ACCESSORY BUILDING AREA AND SIDE YARD SETBACK TO CONSTRUCT A DWELLING 595 FOX LANE, AS PER CASE NO. BZA 30-17, DRAWINGS NO. BZA DATED JULY 28, 2017, BE APPROVED, BASED ON THE FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS IN THE STAFF MEMO AND/OR PRESENTED AT THE MEETING. Mr. Coulter seconded the motion. All members voted aye and the motion was approved. 3. Variance Signage 2285 W. Dublin-Granville Rd. (Borgata Pizza Cafe) BZA Mr. Phillips reviewed the staff memo: Findings of fact: 1. This property is in the C-2 district where internal signs are not permitted to be illuminated. Page 5 of 11 BZA Meeting September 9, 2017 Minutes

11 2. The applicant placed 2 illuminated internal signs in the window of the restaurant. The requested variance is to allow 2 illuminated internal signs in Suites 113 and 114. The following conclusions are presented: 1. The tenant space has an illuminated wall mounted sign above its entrance to identify the restaurant. No practical difficulty was obvious to staff. 2. The delivery of governmental services should not be affected. Discussion: Ed Bisconti, 2128 Teardrop Avenue, Columbus, said if you look at his space as you are driving down State Route 161, it is unique because of the way it sets back, and the restaurant s sign is also smaller than other signs in the strip center. When he originally submitted his materials for a sign permit, the sign was supposed to have thirty inch letters but the sign was denied because it had to be scaled to the white space. The sign s letters had to be twenty-four inches or less, but the sign is difficult to read from the road. He said if you head east you do not even see the restaurant until you have already driven past, and if you head west, you do not see the restaurant until you are right up in front of it. He wanted the illuminated sign to attract some attention to the building since his restaurant is the only business in that section of the strip center right now. He said all the other signs are bigger and have thirty inch letters and believes that people are having a hard time trying to find his restaurant. He said his sign is tasteful and displays the name only. He said he does not have a problem removing the electronic open sign but he feels that people are having a difficult time trying to find his restaurant. Ms. Crane asked who advised him the letters were too big and Mr. Bisconti replied Lynda Bitar from City staff. She asked if Ms. Bitar s response was due to an Architectural Review Board decision and Mr. Coulter replied there was a signage program that was approved for the center. Mr. Phillips said the center signage program was approved and as long as Borgata s sign met the signage for the center staff could approve it. Anything bigger would have had to go back to the Architectural Review Board for approval. Mr. Bisconti said he did not have time to go back to the Architectural Review Board because he had to open the restaurant; he was eight months behind schedule. Mr. Phillips said Mr. Bisconti has the option to go back to the Architectural Review Board if he would like a bigger sign. Mr. Bisconti said he did not have an additional six thousand dollars for a new sign. Mr. Coulter said he drove past the center last week looking for the restaurant and noticed the open sign but he felt the tree may be more of a hindrance in a few years and Mr. Bisconti agreed. Mr. Seitz asked if there was a pylon sign for the center and Mr. Bisconti replied no. Page 6 of 11 BZA Meeting September 9, 2017 Minutes

12 Ms. Crane believed all of the tenants in the shopping center would want an illuminated sign if one person gets to have it. Ms. Crane asked if there was anyone present to speak for or against the application. Motion: Mr. Coulter moved: THAT THE REQUEST BY BORGATA PIZZA CAFE AND LINWORTH PLAZA LLC FOR A VARIANCE FROM CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR SIGNAGE TO ALLOW 2 ILLUMINATED WINDOW SIGNS AT 2285 WEST DUBLIN- GRANVILLE ROAD, SUITES 113 AND 114, AS PER CASE NO. BZA 31-17, DRAWINGS NO. BZA DATED AUGUST 7, 2017, BE APPROVED, BASED ON THE FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS IN THE STAFF MEMO AND/OR PRESENTED AT THE MEETING. Mr. Falcoski seconded the motion. All members voted nay and the motion was denied. 4. Variance Rear Yard Setback Fence 6500 Meadowbrook Cir. (Christopher Wald) BZA Mr. Phillips reviewed the staff memo: Findings of fact: 1. This property is in the R-10 district with a required rear yard of 30 feet. Fencing is not permitted between the right-of-way line and building line. 2. The Linworth Road right-of-way is 80 feet wide. There appears to be an existing split rail fence within the Linworth road right-of-way. 3. The Board of Zoning Appeals does not the authority to allow fencing within the right-of-way. 4. The applicant is proposing to remove the existing split rail fence and erect a fence in the rear of the property, along the Linworth Road right-of-way. The requested variance is 30 feet. The following conclusions are presented: 1. This property fronts 2 rights-of-way, creating a practical difficulty when attempting to fence the rear yard. In this particular case, the wider Linworth Road right-of-way than the 50 feet found in this district and encroaches an additional 15 feet onto this property. There is some existing screening of the existing fence and the applicant is proposing additional landscaping along the new fence. These factors mitigate the substantial nature of the variance request. Page 7 of 11 BZA Meeting September 9, 2017 Minutes

13 2. The essential character of the neighborhood should not be substantially altered. 3. The delivery of governmental services should not be affected. Discussion: Christopher Wald, 6500 Meadowbrook Circle, said he just moved into the neighborhood and loves Worthington and hopes he never has to move again. He said the fence is in bad shape and does not have any functionality and needs to be replaced so his family can utilize the back yard and keep their puppy safe. He said he plans to landscape the area and add trees so there would not be any tunnel effect. Mr. Coulter said adding trees will soften the effect of the six foot privacy fence. Mr. Wald said if the height of the fence was a problem for the board he could lower the fence height. Ms. Crane asked if there was anyone present to speak for or against this application. Motion: Mr. Seitz moved: THAT THE REQUEST BY CHRISTOPHER WALD FOR A VARIANCE FROM CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR REAR YARD SETBACK TO ERECT A FENCE AT 6500 MEADOWBROOK CIRCLE, AS PER CASE NO. BZA 32-17, DRAWINGS NO. BZA DATED JULY 6, 2017, BE APPROVED, BASED ON THE FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS IN THE STAFF MEMO AND/OR PRESENTED AT THE MEETING. Mr. Falcoski seconded the motion. All board members voted aye and the motion was approved. 5. Variance Side Yard Setback Elevator Addition 809 Robbins Way (Joyce & William Roberts) BZA Findings of fact: 1. This property is an existing lot of record in the R-10 district where the minimum side yard requirement is 8 feet. 2. The applicant is proposing to add a 2 story elevator on the east side of the existing dwelling. On March 2, 2017, the Board of Zoning Appeals granted a side yard setback variance to construct a 6 foot 7 inch by approximately 10 foot 5 inch 2 story elevator structure approximately 3 feet 8 inches from the east property line. Page 8 of 11 BZA Meeting September 9, 2017 Minutes

14 3. The current proposal is an approximately 6 foot 5¼ inch by approximately 11 foot 6½ inch 2 story elevator, approximately 3 feet 9 ¾ inches from the east property line. The requested variance is approximately 4 feet 2¼ inches. 4. The 2013 Residential Code of Ohio requires walls within 5 feet of the property line be constructed of 1 hour, fire-resistant-rated construction. The granting of any zoning code variance does not grant variances from building code requirements. The following conclusions are presented: 1. The addition continues to be relatively small and the encroachment into the side yard is slightly less although the mass of the addition is slightly larger. This variance request is not substantial. 2. The essential character of the neighborhood should not be substantially altered. 3. The delivery of governmental services should not be affected. Discussion: Ed Feher, 4041 North High Street, Columbus, said he was representing Joyce and William Roberts. Ms. Crane asked if there was anyone to speak for or against this application. Motion: Mr. Falcoski: THAT THE REQUEST BY JOYCE AND WILLIAM ROBERTS FOR A VARIANCE FROM CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR SIDE YARD SETBACK TO CONSTRUCT AN ADDITION AT 809 ROBBINS WAY, AS PER CASE NO. BZA 33-17, DRAWINGS NO. BZA DATED AUGUST 11, 2017, BE APPROVED, BASED ON THE FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS IN THE STAFF MEMO AND/OR PRESENTED AT THE MEETING. Mr. Seitz seconded the memo. All members voted aye and the motion was approved. 6. Variance Signage 6384 Proprietors Rd. (New Avenue Architects & Engineers/Ohio Beer Co.) BZA Mr. Falcoski stated he will abstain from all discussion on this item since he has a financial interest in New Avenue Architects and Engineers. Findings of fact: 1. This property is in the I-1 district where each business is permitted 1 wall mounted sign and a single professional nameplate not exceeding 2 square feet. Temporary signs are not permitted. Page 9 of 11 BZA Meeting September 9, 2017 Minutes

15 2. A sign is any device, structure, material or combination of these intended to advertise or draw attention to such items as business names, organization names, real estate, buildings or structures, products, services or entertainment. Temporary signs are further defined as a sign associated with a temporary activity, not permanently attached to a building or permanently embedded on a site. Temporary signs shall be prohibited except with issuance of a Temporary Use Permit as per Section (b)(5) or as provided for in Section (f), C-5 Central Commercial Zoning District Exceptions. 3. The applicant has placed the following signs on the property: a. 2, approximately 2 foot by 2 foot signs on 2 entry doors, b. A 7 foot diameter sign on the north elevation, on an adjacent wall and to the right of the main entrance, c. A temporary sign in the yard. 4. The applicant is proposing a 2 foot 2 inch by 16 foot 8¼ inch sign on the west elevation and above the main entry door. This would bring the total number of wall-mounted signs to The requested variance is a second, wall-mounted sign for this tenant. It appears the signs on the doors will be removed and replaced with an internal sign visible through the new entry doors when improvements are completed. The following conclusions are presented: 1. If the purpose of the circular sign is to attract attention to this property when on Proprietors Road, it is not visible traveling north on Proprietors Road, and the main sign over the door will be easier to see and read heading south on this road. Staff did not find a practical difficulty addressed by the second, wall mounted sign. 2. The 2 additional signs on the doors exceed the professional nameplate size and must be removed. The temporary sign must also be removed. 3. The delivery of governmental services should not be affected. Discussion: Adam Brandkamp, 6384 Proprietors Road said the business is a beer distributorship, they sell beer to restaurants, bars, stores and a small percentage of keg sales to walk-in customers, which is limited by the State of Ohio. He said the signs in the beginning were magnetic signs they put up but they plan to take down all of the temporary signage. The wall mural and the sign presented at the meeting is what they would like to keep. He said Page 10 of 11 BZA Meeting September 9, 2017 Minutes

16 they are trying to fix up the façade of the building to make the building more attractive for customers. Mr. Coulter said he liked the wall mural but he should have gotten the approval before putting the mural up. He asked if he planned to come back for approval of directional signage and if the signs would be illuminated. Mr. Brandkamp replied no to both questions. He said he planned to install some gooseneck lighting, but there are no plans for evening operations. Ms. Crane asked if there was anyone to speak for or against this application. Motion: Mr. Seitz moved: THAT THE REQUEST BY NEW AVENUE ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS, OHIO BEER COMPANY, AND MORRISCO PROPERTIES LLC FOR A VARIANCE FROM CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR SIGNAGE TO PLACE A SECOND WALL MOUNTED SIGN AT 6384 PROPRIETORS ROAD, AS PER CASE NO. BZA 34-17, DRAWINGS NO. BZA DATED AUGUST 11, 2017, BE APPROVED, BASED ON THE FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS IN THE STAFF MEMO AND/OR PRESENTED AT THE MEETING. Mr. Coulter seconded the motion. Mr. Falcoski abstained, the remaining members voted aye, and the motion was approved. D. Other There was no other business. E. Adjournment Mr. Seitz moved to adjourn the meeting, seconded by Mr. Falcoski. All members voted aye and the meeting adjourned at 8:15 p.m. Page 11 of 11 BZA Meeting September 9, 2017 Minutes

17 City of Worthington BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS APPLICATION Meetings - First Thursday of Every Month 1. Property Location 2. Present/Proposed Use 3. Zoning District 4ti'i J~; /?~'5-J1Nf2ANT t;tj'l.l~aj P#<()& fz!'_~ 4. Applicant Address Phone Number(s) 5. Property Owner Address Phone Number(s) 6. Action Requested (ie. type of variance) 7. Project Details: ~ \W\ SA-VT Z. ---2d.dtC1_ CJ}A t2r N v ~ \ 1 ' 3 l :f ' 'luft f a) Description N\ \) ~ go. CP<(i t~.. -~n~ s6) - tcwmg@iaf... ojj?~iw J5JS- b1~nf L RJP,, 1 S'iZ"-ttJO, t~1r110us 1 43-z;w Vt±~ "t>wOI, 'DMlO llii..~~ I -~6@{>11dA1SCG \J8{V 1P<J:J_G-G _ b) Expected Completion Date J:&kk D f ~1 7 c) Approxi~ate Cost 4J ~I QOO, o_:;.. PLEASE READ THE FOLLOWING STATEMENT AND SIGN YOUR NAME: The information contained in this application and in all attachments is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. I further acknowledge that I have familiarized myself with all applicable sections of the Worthington Codified Ordinances and will comply with all applicable regulations.?{!: r-/1 ;;- Date

18 Abutting Property Owners List for 455 E. Wilson Bridge Rd. Rush Creek Investors LLC 7200 Huntley Road LLC Geldreich Family LP Carlo Cautelo Mary Ondecko AVODAH Staffing & Recruiting Golden China Express 540 Office Center Pl., Suite Greensview Dr. 8 Wildlake Dr Worthington Galena Rd. 445 E. Wilson Bridge Rd. 451 E. Wilson Bridge Rd. 453 E. W ilson Bridge Rd. Gahanna, OH Upper Arlington, OH Covington, KY Worthington, OH Worthington, OH Worthington, OH Worthington, OH 43085

19 Worthington Board of Zoning Appeals Variance Application for the Yappy Greek Restaurant, 455 E. Wilson bridge Rd., Worthington, Ohio The applicant, Jim Saltz, proposes to paint a mural on the portion of the existing retail building occupied by the Yappy Greek Restaurant. The existing exterior is brick and wood. The proposed painting would occur on existing wood portions of the building and on a 64 s.f wood panel to be attached to the brick. In the future event of this space being occupied by another business, this wood panel could be removed without damaging the brick. The existing sign on the front of the building will remain. The wood surrounding the sign will be painted to resemble stone. The stone painting will continue along the east elevation for approximately 14 feet. The 64 s.f. wood panel to be attached to the brick will be centered beneath this stone painting. Above the existing windows on the east elevation of the building, the wood will be painted to resemble a blue, standing seam, metal roof. Fo1Iowing are responses to questions on the application; 1) The applicant believes this variance would increase the beneficial use of this property. 2) The city of Worthington has no ordinance regulating murals. Therefore, a variance from the sign ordinance is required. Some individuals may view this as a substantial variance from the sign ordinance. The applicant views this proposal as art, not signage, and therefore not a substantial variance. 3) The neighborhood and adjoining properties would not suffer substantial detriment. 4) The variance would not affect the delivery of governmental services. 5) The property owner had no knowledge of the zoning restriction. 6) The owner of the Yappy Greek is aware of the City's future plans for improvements to the intersection of Wilson Bridge and Worthington-Galena Roads. These improvements, while necessary, can cause predicaments to businesses in the area during the construction and can affect profitability during construction. This proposal will enhance the appearance of the business before, during, and after the construction period. 7) The spirit and intent of this proposal is to improve the appearance of this property and enhance a healthy, profitable business. Thank you for your thoughtful consideration of this proposal. Jim Saltz 2667 Charing Rd., Columbus, Ohio

20 455 E. Wilson Bridge Rd.

21 "tj rv.... tj CIJ)' OF WORTHINGTON \SL.~ ;J_<S> \l DRAWING NO..Q OATE 1-7-l'] ~t?rtr\ // 311'~.P.~fL -=~=- : ~-- tk?r.py t1~8~\(. - ~--.. ~.4~'2-~r..-w.\ ~~.ON-\?~ \...J t M s A- C.,-i ~ ~-~... P._4._E -- ~v:l WDR1l-:\_\tl-4!1l]!...?)~tj_!.z~ lp4-7 I&> /Ti

22 I I

23

24

25

26

27

28 BZA /08/17

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36