Northwest Timberlands

Transcription

1 Seral Stage and Patch Size Distribution Analyses for the North Coast Timber Supply Area March 3, 2008 Funded by: Investment Account (through Timber Ltd.) Project # Investment Schedule COTSA2669 Contract Admin #: Patch/Seral Prepared by: Rick Brouwer, RPF Ltd. Limited 03 Kenney Street Terrace, BC Canada V8G 3E6 Tel: Fax: Web:

2 Acknowledgements Thanks to Shannon Pearce at Timber for her patience with this project. Wendy Rolston and Jim Knox of Magellan Digital Mapping were very adaptable as the dataset was developed, and were extremely easy to work with. Thanks also to representatives of local licencees for their interest in this project, for their co-operative and collaborative approach, and for providing block data, thereby making this project applicable and useable. ii

3 Executive Summary An analysis of the forest cover information was conducted to determine the seral and patch distributions for Landscape s within the North Coast Timber Supply Area. This analysis was carried out at two points in time: at the end of 2006, and then at the end of 20, after aging the forest cover and including projected harvesting. There are instances where seral stage imbalances exist on a proportional basis for licensees who have s that do not fully overlap with Landscape s. These cases should be reviewed to address the imbalances and ensure that they do not affect other licensees. Information is provided on mid-seral and old seral constraints for Site Series Surrogates as defined in the Central and North Coast Order. In addition, analyses to support the implementation of objectives for important fisheries watersheds and for upland streams are also provided, identifying areas that should be reviewed in more depth. One of 30 important fisheries watersheds is identified for further analysis. Eight of 700 upland watershed areas are identified as requiring further examination. Patch size distribution results for the North Coast TSA are provided. This information should limit conflicts between licencees when proceeding with block development, and will inform both licencee and Ministry of s and Range staff when considering the potential for cumulative impacts on the forest landbase. Information is also provided for the seral stage and patch size distribution results for licencee s within Landscape s, and tables are provided for licencees to review their specific situations. iii

4 (this page intentionally left blank) iv

5 Table of Contents Executive Summary... iii Introduction Methodology Results and Discussion Seral Stage Consolidated seral stage information (All Landscape s, all licensees) Seral Stage information for Licencee s that overlap with Landscape s Ecosystem-Based Management (Central and North Coast Order) Important Fisheries Watersheds Upland Streams Critical Grizzly Bear Habitat Patch Size Overall patch size distribution results (all Landscape s, all licensees) Consolidated patch size distribution information (all Landscape s, all licensees) Patch Size Distribution information for Licencee s that overlap with Landscape s Conclusions...86 Sources of Information:...87 Appendix A: Process algorithm for Seral stage and Patch size distribution analysis (North Coast District)...A Appendix B: Patch Size and Seral Stage Procedure...A9 Appendix C: Seral Stage Tables by Licencee...A3 Appendix E: Patch Size Distribution Tables by Licencee...A43 Appendix F: A guide for using the Seral Stage and Patch Size Distribution Analysie for the North Coast Timber Supply Area (March 2008)...A53 v

6 (this page intentionally left blank) vi

7 Introduction This project is a roll-up and update of information that was prepared in support of implementation of the Central and North Coast Order (CNCO), and for measurement of cumulative forest impacts within the North Coast District. The project involves updating the age, attribute, activity, and opening fields in a forest cover data set to make it current to December 3, 2006, and then carrying out patch and seral stage distribution analysis by landscape unit and forest development unit. This data is then trended forward for a five year period, and projected harvesting is added in. This analysis will allow licensees to evaluate their situation in achieving the targets for Landscape s (LU) in accordance with the CNCO. No licensee is obligated to roll this information up across the District this would be something that the Ministry of s and Range (MoFR) or the Integrated Land Management Bureau (ILMB) of the Ministry of Agriculture and Lands might do. The benefit of rolling the information up across the District is that all parties in the District end up with a similar data set and a reproducible process for ongoing monitoring and evaluation of the LU targets. This will also be of benefit to MoFR and ILMB for monitoring purposes. Seral stage data is separated into four age ranges: early, mid-seral, mature, and old. These seral stages have slightly different age parameters, depending on the biogeoclimatic variant and Natural Disturbance Type (NDT) that an area falls within. The target distribution amounts for the mid and old seral stages within each LU are based on the CNCO. Patch size distribution is evaluated against three patch size ranges: small (less than 40 ha), mid-sized (40 to 80 ha), and large (80-0 ha). Patches are groupings of similarly aged openings that are adjacent to another. Adjacent is defined as contiguous, or separated by less than 200 m of forest of a different seral stage, or by natural non-forested features less than 75 m wide. The targets for patch size distribution are the same for NDTs and 2 in the North Coast District. There is no NCT 3 or NDT 4 within the North Coast District. NDT 5 is alpine forest and will not be impacted by forest operations, so it is not included in this report. The data is also used to measure consistency with Objectives identified in the CNCO for Important Fisheries Watersheds and for Upland s. 7

8 2 Methodology In general, the steps required to carry out this project are Review and clean base data set Update data with information from licensees, ILMB, and MoFR to a common time frame Perform Seral stage analysis Perform Patch Size Distribution analysis Summarize results in tabular format The base data set used for this project is a combination of data for the North Coast District, starting with the Vegetation Resource Inventory data downloaded from the Land and Resource Data Warehouse, and augmented and updated with information from the timber supply review dataset prepared by the Defined Area Management group for the North Coast, as well as a further refinement of the same TSR dataset provided by the BC Ministry of s and Range. Review, cleaning, and updating of the data set was performed by Magellan Digital Mapping, and involved the acquisition of information from affected licensees and BC Timber Sales. This information included data on logging history, proposed harvest units for the period for all licensees, and (FDU) boundaries where they were available. FDU boundaries were provided by licensees: BC Timber Sales, Coast Tsimshian Resources Limited Partnership, Metlakatla Corporation, Sonora Logging Ltd, and Timber Ltd. Seral analyses included overlapping licensee FDU boundaries with Landscape s (LU), and determining the areas of mid and old seral stages in both BEC variants and Natural Disturbance Types that fall within the FDUs in a Landscape. The seral data was also used to compare watershed-level information with targets set out in the CNCO for Important Fisheries Watersheds and for Upland areas within :,000 forest atlas watersheds. Patch analyses included calculating the area of patches that fall within similar groupings, by both FDU and LU. Tables are produced to summarise the areas by both Landscape and by FDU for both the Seral and the Patch analyses. A detailed algorithm process is provided in Appendices A and B. 8

9 3 Results and Discussion The primary products from this project are tables that summarise the distribution of seral stages and patch sizes for Landscape s, and for watersheds identified in the Central and North Coast Order (CNCO). In addition, patch and seral information is provided regarding the portions of FDUs that fall with the LUs. This will allow licensees and the MoFR to monitor and evaluate whether CNCO targets are being achieved, or whether progress is being made towards achieving the targets. 3. Seral Stage The following tables provide information on the distribution of seral stages across landscape units. Landscape s are red-flagged as not achieving the seral stage targets. 3.. Consolidated seral stage information (All Landscape s, all licensees) The following tables provide data for three seral stage groupings (early, mature plus old, and old) by biogeoclimatic (BGC) variant within a Landscape. A variance is calculated between the targeted seral stage limit, and the actual seral stage distribution.a red flag is identified where the variance is within 00 ha of the target or the BGC variant and NDT type within a Landscape. When the target threshold has been exceeded (early) or is in deficit (mature + old, old), negative numbers are denoted (in red with parentheses). A blank cell means that there is no red flag for this BEC variant.this data is presented at two stages (end of 2006, and end of 20). To determine if the trend is in the right direction, specific red flag variants can be compared between 2006 and 20. When comparing the 2006 with the 20 data, there will be a few instances when a BEC variant is in one table and not the other. This is due to there being no area in that variant at that time. For example, if there were no early forests in an area in 2006, but there was logging projected for the period , then the variant will show up in the 20 table. 9

10 Table : All LUs, -Seral situation as of Dec 3, 2006 Table : All LUs, -Seral situation as of Dec 3, 2006 Landscape - - (AU) Actual Target (<%) Anyox - CWH wm - AU (44.2) (.3) Anyox - CWH wm Anyox - CWH wm - 0 (5) (9.4) Anyox - CWH wm (2.6) (53.7) Anyox - CWH wm Anyox - MH mm Anyox - MH mm (.2) (479.7) Aristazabal Aristazabal Banks - - AU (.7) (3.0) Belle Bay - CWH wm - AU Belle Bay - CWH wm Belle Bay - CWH wm Belle Bay - MH mm Belle Bay - MH wh CWH vm CWH vm CWH vm AU (5.6) (7.4) MH mm MH mm AU3 0 (5) (.9) (5.8) (2.6) (3.5) (5.4) - CWH vm - AU CWH vm - AU3.7 (9.7) (2.7) - CWH vm - AU4.5 (9.5) (9.3) - CWH vm CWH vm CWH vm CWH vm CWH vm AU MH mm MH mm MH mm AU3 0 (5) (2.) - CWH vm - AU CWH vm - AU3 0 (5) (.4) - CWH vm CWH vm CWH vm CWH vm MH mm MH mm MH wh MH wh AU3 90. (40.) (2.3) MH wh MH wh

11 Table : All LUs, -Seral situation as of Dec 3, 2006 Landscape - - (AU) Actual Target (<%) - CWH vm MH mm Chapple - - AU (49.3) (.3) Chapple Chapple (20.7) (3.9) Chapple Chapple - MH wh Chapple - MH wh Dundas - - AU Dundas (5) (.6) Gil - - AU3 96. (46.) (43.9) Gil Gil Gil - MH wh - AU (49.9) () Gil - MH wh AU AU (4.6) (3.4) MH wh (.4) (0.) - MH wh MH wh - 0 (0) (3.9) - MH wh MH wh AU AU (5.) (8.) MH wh MH wh (36.4) (6.) - MH wh MH wh MH wh Helmcken - - AU (4.3) (.7) Helmcken Helmcken Helmcken - MH wh AU MH wh MH wh Johnston - CWH vm - AU Johnston - CWH vm - AU Johnston - CWH vm - AU3.4 (0.4) (.4) Johnston - CWH vm Johnston - CWH vm Johnston - CWH vm Johnston - - AU Johnston

12 Table : All LUs, -Seral situation as of Dec 3, 2006 Landscape - - (AU) Actual Target (<%) Johnston Johnston - MH mm AU AU (.4) (35.3) MH wh - AU (49.9) () - MH wh CWH vm - AU CWH vm - AU (34.7) (49.2) - CWH vm CWH vm (5) (.3) - MH mm Khutzeymateen Park - CWH vm - AU Khutzeymateen Park - CWH vm - AU (3.2) (.4) Khutzeymateen Park - CWH vm Khutzeymateen Park - CWH vm Khutzeymateen Park Khutzeymateen Park - CWH wm - AU Khutzeymateen Park - CWH wm Khutzeymateen Park - CWH wm Khutzeymateen Park - MH mm - AU 0 (0) (2.9) Khutzeymateen Park - MH mm Khutzeymateen Park - MH mm CWH vm - AU3.9 (0.9) (.9) - CWH vm CWH vm CWH vm CWH vm AU3 0 (5) (3.2) MH mm Kitkiata - CWH vm Kitkiata - MH mm CWH wm -.0 (8.0) (0.6) - CWH ws - AU CWH ws CWH ws CWH ws CWH ws 2 - AU3 0 (5) (0.7) - CWH ws CWH ws MH mm MH mm Klekane - CWH vm - AU3 0 (5) (.) Klekane - CWH vm Klekane - CWH vm Klekane Klekane Klekane - MH mm -.5 (9.5) (9.) Kshwan - CWH wm - AU Kshwan - CWH wm Kshwan - MH mm AU AU

13 Table : All LUs, -Seral situation as of Dec 3, 2006 Landscape - - (AU) Actual Target (<%) MH mm MH wh CWH vm - AU CWH vm MH mm Laredo - - AU3 57. (7.) (.4) Laredo Laredo Laredo Laredo Laredo - MH wh Laredo - MH wh Laredo - MH wh Marmot - CWH wm - AU (3.7) (2.7) Marmot - CWH wm Marmot - CWH wm Marmot - MH mm Marmot - MH mm McCauley - - AU3 0 (5) (2.2) Monckton - - AU3.9 (8.9) (8.4) Monckton Monckton - MH wh Observatory East - CWH wm Observatory East - MH mm Observatory West - - AU Observatory West Observatory West - CWH wm - AU2 0 (5) (3.6) Observatory West - CWH wm - AU Observatory West - CWH wm Observatory West - CWH wm Observatory West - CWH wm Observatory West - MH mm (48.8) (5.4) Observatory West - MH mm Observatory West - MH wh Olh - CWH wm - AU Olh - CWH wm Olh - CWH wm Olh - CWH wm Olh - CWH wm Olh - MH mm - AU2 0 (5) (5.) Olh - MH mm Olh - MH mm (0.5) (200.6) - - AU MH wh MH wh Pearse - - AU3.8 (8.8) (2.) Pearse AU MH wh MH wh MH wh AU3 90. (40.) (33.9) 3

14 Table : All LUs, -Seral situation as of Dec 3, 2006 Landscape - - (AU) Actual Target (<%) CWH vm - AU CWH vm - AU CWH vm - AU CWH vm CWH vm CWH vm AU (5.8) (0.4) MH mm MH mm MH mm MH wh AU (27.4) (26.3) MH wh MH wh CWH vm - AU CWH vm CWH vm CWH vm AU3 0 (5) (0.4) MH mm MH mm Skeena Islands - CWH vm - AU Skeena Islands - CWH vm - AU.4 (0.4) (0.4) Skeena Islands - CWH vm - AU Skeena Islands - CWH vm Skeena Islands - MH mm CWH vm - AU CWH vm - AU CWH vm - AU (37.7) (39.9) - CWH vm (2.0) (27.7) - CWH vm CWH vm AU AU (.) (9.4) MH mm - AU (06.9) () - MH mm - AU 0 (0) (2.0) - MH mm - AU MH mm MH mm - 0 (5) (0.4) - MH mm MH mm MH wh (22.3) (7.0) - MH wh Sparkling - CWH vm - AU Sparkling - CWH vm - AU (7.6) (32.9) 4

15 Table : All LUs, -Seral situation as of Dec 3, 2006 Landscape - - (AU) Actual Target (<%) Sparkling - CWH vm Sparkling - CWH vm Sparkling - CWH vm Sparkling - MH mm Sparkling - MH mm Stagoo - CWH wm - AU Stagoo - CWH wm Stagoo - CWH wm Stagoo - CWH ws - AU3 0 (5) () Stagoo - MH mm - AU Stagoo - MH mm Stagoo - MH mm Stagoo - MH mm AU (24.0) (4.3) - - AU (46.2) (72.7) CWH vm - AU3 0 (5) (9.8) - CWH vm CWH vm CWH vm CWH vm MH mm MH mm -.7 (8.7) (.8) - MH mm MH wh - AU3 0 (5) (.9) - MH wh MH wh MH wh Tolmie - - AU4 0 (5) (2.4) - CWH vm - AU3 55. (5.) (3.5) - CWH vm - AU4 0 (5) (6.2) - CWH vm CWH vm CWH vm CWH vm CWH vm AU MH mm - 0 (5) (.0) - MH mm MH mm (49.6) () - MH mm (6.6) (6.0) - MH mm AU AU MH wh - AU (49.9) () - MH wh MH wh

16 Table : All LUs, -Seral situation as of Dec 3, 2006 Landscape - - (AU) Actual Target (<%) - - AU CWH vm - AU CWH vm AU AU (5) () MH mm - 0 (5) (3.5) - MH mm MH wh - AU2 6.8 (.8) (.) - MH wh MH wh AU (36.6) (37.2) (5) (4.0) CWH vm - AU (8.3) (8.0) - CWH vm - AU (42.9) (86.6) - CWH vm - AU4 0 (5) (5.3) - CWH vm CWH vm CWH vm CWH vm AU3 0 (5) (23.9) MH mm - AU3 0 (5) (4.6) - MH mm MH mm MH wh MH wh

17 Table 2: All LUs, -Seral situation as of Dec 3, 20 Table 2: All LUs, -Seral situation as of Dec 3, 20 Landscape - - (AU) Actual Target (<%) Anyox - CWH wm - AU (44.2) (.3) Anyox - CWH wm Anyox - CWH wm (5.0) (6.) Anyox - CWH wm Anyox - MH mm Anyox - MH mm (.2) (479.7) Aristazabal Aristazabal Banks - - AU (.4) (3.0) Belle Bay - CWH wm - AU3 0 (5) (0.7) Belle Bay - CWH wm Belle Bay - CWH wm Belle Bay - MH mm Belle Bay - MH wh CWH vm - AU (4.7) (0.) - CWH vm - AU (35.4) (4.8) - CWH vm CWH vm CWH vm CWH vm AU (5.6) (7.4) MH mm MH mm AU3 0 (5) (.9) (5.8) (2.6) (3.5) (5.4) - CWH vm - AU CWH vm - AU3.5 (9.5) (2.6) - CWH vm - AU CWH vm CWH vm CWH vm CWH vm CWH vm MH mm MH mm MH mm AU3 0 (5) (2.) CWH vm - AU CWH vm - AU3 0 (5) (.4) - CWH vm CWH vm CWH vm CWH vm MH mm MH mm MH wh MH wh AU (39.6) (2.2)

18 Table 2: All LUs, -Seral situation as of Dec 3, 20 Landscape - - (AU) Actual Target (<%) - MH wh MH wh CWH vm MH mm Chapple - - AU Chapple (20.7) (3.9) Chapple Chapple - MH wh Chapple - MH wh Dundas - - AU Dundas (5) (.6) Gil - - AU (32.6) (3.0) Gil Gil Gil - MH wh - AU (49.9) () Gil - MH wh AU AU (4.6) (3.4) MH wh (.4) (0.) - MH wh MH wh - 0 (0) (3.9) - MH wh MH wh AU AU (5.) (8.) MH wh MH wh (36.9) (6.2) - MH wh MH wh MH wh MH wh Helmcken - - AU (4.3) (.7) Helmcken Helmcken Helmcken - MH wh AU MH wh MH wh Johnston - CWH vm - AU Johnston - CWH vm - AU Johnston - CWH vm - AU Johnston - CWH vm Johnston - CWH vm Johnston - CWH vm

19 Table 2: All LUs, -Seral situation as of Dec 3, 20 Landscape - - (AU) Actual Target (<%) Johnston - - AU Johnston Johnston Johnston - MH mm AU AU (32.2) (7.8) MH wh - AU (49.9) () - MH wh CWH vm - AU CWH vm - AU (37.6) (6.9) - CWH vm CWH vm (5) (.3) - MH mm Khutzeymateen Park - CWH vm - AU Khutzeymateen Park - CWH vm - AU (38.0) (32.7) Khutzeymateen Park - CWH vm Khutzeymateen Park - CWH vm Khutzeymateen Park Khutzeymateen Park - CWH wm - AU Khutzeymateen Park - CWH wm - AU (7.3) (23.7) Khutzeymateen Park - CWH wm Khutzeymateen Park - CWH wm Khutzeymateen Park - MH mm - AU 0 (0) (2.9) Khutzeymateen Park - MH mm Khutzeymateen Park - MH mm CWH vm - AU (0.4) (22.8) - CWH vm CWH vm CWH vm CWH vm AU3 0 (5) (3.2) MH mm - 0 (5) (2.3) - MH mm Kitkiata - CWH vm Kitkiata - MH mm CWH wm -.0 (8.0) (0.6) - CWH ws - AU CWH ws CWH ws CWH ws CWH ws 2 - AU3 0 (5) (0.7) - CWH ws CWH ws MH mm 2 - AU MH mm MH mm Klekane - CWH vm Klekane - CWH vm Klekane Klekane Klekane - MH mm -.5 (9.5) (9.) Kshwan - CWH wm - AU Kshwan - CWH wm Kshwan - MH mm

20 Table 2: All LUs, -Seral situation as of Dec 3, 20 Landscape - - (AU) Actual Target (<%) - - AU AU MH mm MH wh CWH vm - AU CWH vm MH mm Laredo - - AU (4.6) (2.9) Laredo Laredo Laredo Laredo Laredo - MH wh Laredo - MH wh Laredo - MH wh Marmot - CWH wm - AU (3.7) (2.7) Marmot - CWH wm Marmot - CWH wm Marmot - MH mm Marmot - MH mm McCauley - - AU3 0 (5) (2.2) McCauley Monckton - - AU (.4) (.2) Monckton Monckton - MH wh Observatory East - CWH wm Observatory East - MH mm Observatory West - - AU Observatory West Observatory West - CWH wm - AU2 0 (5) (3.6) Observatory West - CWH wm - AU Observatory West - CWH wm Observatory West - CWH wm Observatory West - CWH wm Observatory West - MH mm (48.8) (5.4) Observatory West - MH mm Observatory West - MH wh Olh - CWH wm - AU Olh - CWH wm Olh - CWH wm Olh - CWH wm Olh - CWH wm Olh - MH mm - AU2 0 (5) (5.) Olh - MH mm Olh - MH mm (0.5) (200.6) - - AU MH wh MH wh Pearse - - AU3.8 (8.8) (2.) Pearse AU

21 Table 2: All LUs, -Seral situation as of Dec 3, 20 Landscape - - (AU) Actual Target (<%) MH wh MH wh MH wh AU3 90. (40.) (33.9) CWH vm - AU 55.5 (5.5) (7.7) - CWH vm - AU CWH vm - AU CWH vm CWH vm CWH vm AU (5.8) (0.4) - - AU4 0 (5) (.0) MH mm - AU4 0 (5) (7.4) - MH mm MH mm MH mm MH wh AU (27.4) (26.3) MH wh MH wh CWH vm - AU CWH vm CWH vm CWH vm AU3 0 (5) (0.4) MH mm MH mm Skeena Islands - CWH vm - AU Skeena Islands - CWH vm - AU.4 (0.4) (0.4) Skeena Islands - CWH vm - AU Skeena Islands - CWH vm Skeena Islands - MH mm CWH vm - AU CWH vm - AU CWH vm - AU (37.7) (39.9) - CWH vm (2.0) (27.7) - CWH vm CWH vm AU AU (.) (9.4) MH mm - AU (06.9) () - MH mm - AU 0 (0) (2.0) - MH mm - AU

22 Table 2: All LUs, -Seral situation as of Dec 3, 20 Landscape - - (AU) Actual Target (<%) - MH mm MH mm - 0 (5) (0.4) - MH mm MH mm MH wh (22.3) (7.0) - MH wh Sparkling - CWH vm - AU Sparkling - CWH vm - AU (48.2) (89.8) Sparkling - CWH vm Sparkling - CWH vm Sparkling - CWH vm Sparkling - MH mm Sparkling - MH mm Stagoo - CWH wm - AU Stagoo - CWH wm Stagoo - CWH wm Stagoo - CWH ws - AU3 0 (5) () Stagoo - MH mm - AU Stagoo - MH mm Stagoo - MH mm Stagoo - MH mm AU CWH vm - AU3 8 (3) (5.9) - CWH vm CWH vm CWH vm CWH vm MH mm MH mm -.7 (8.7) (.8) - MH mm MH wh - AU3 0 (5) (.9) - MH wh MH wh MH wh Tolmie - - AU4 0 (5) (2.4) - CWH vm - AU3 55. (5.) (3.5) - CWH vm - AU4 0 (5) (6.2) - CWH vm CWH vm CWH vm CWH vm CWH vm AU MH mm - 0 (5) (.0) - MH mm MH mm (49.6) () - MH mm (7.4) (6.7) - MH mm AU

23 Table 2: All LUs, -Seral situation as of Dec 3, 20 Landscape - - (AU) Actual Target (<%) - - AU MH wh - AU (49.9) () - MH wh MH wh AU AU CWH vm - AU3 7.7 (2.7) (6.5) - CWH vm AU AU (5) () MH mm - 0 (5) (3.5) - MH mm MH wh - AU2 6.8 (.8) (.) - MH wh MH wh AU3 5.6 (.6) (.7) (5) (4.0) CWH vm - AU (8.3) (8.0) - CWH vm - AU3 7 (2) (40.4) - CWH vm - AU4 0 (5) (5.3) - CWH vm CWH vm CWH vm CWH vm AU (49.5) (23.7) MH mm - AU3 0 (5) (4.6) - MH mm MH mm MH wh MH wh

24 Table 3: All LUs, Seral situation as of Dec 3, 2006 Table 3: All LUs, Seral situation as of Dec 3, 2006 Landscape - - (AU) Actual Target (<%) Anyox - CWH wm - AU3 0 Anyox - CWH wm - (.0) (304.5) Anyox - MH mm - (.0) () Anyox - CWH wm (22.) () Anyox - MH mm (6.4) (08.6) Anyox - MH mm Anyox - CWH wm - (.0) (.) Anyox - CWH wm (52.5) (272.2) Anyox - CWH wm - AU2 (.0) (.5) Aristazabal - - AU2.8 (27.2) (42.5) Aristazabal (5.0) (793.0) Aristazabal Aristazabal Aristazabal Aristazabal - - AU0 (.0) (2.9) Banks - - AU3 0 Banks - - (.0) (3.6) Banks - - AU Banks Banks Banks Banks Banks - MH wh Banks - MH wh Banks - MH wh - AU2 0. Belle Bay - CWH wm - AU3 0 Belle Bay - MH mm Belle Bay - CWH wm Belle Bay - CWH wm Belle Bay - MH mm Belle Bay Belle Bay Belle Bay - MH wh Belle Bay Belle Bay - MH wh Belle Bay Belle Bay - - AU Belle Bay - CWH wm (4.6) (.8) Belle Bay - CWH wm - AU Belle Bay - CWH wm - AU Belle Bay - CWH wm (5.4) (5.6) Belle Bay - CWH wm Belle Bay - CWH wm - AU Belle Bay - MH wh CWH vm - AU AU3 0 - CWH vm - AU4 (.0) (3.4) - CWH vm - AU0.4 (23.6) (79.6) (20.5) (7.7) - CWH vm (2.5) (83.6) - CWH vm - AU 7.5 (7.5) (20.8) - CWH vm CWH vm MH mm MH mm AU2 2.3 (5.7) (9.6) 24

25 Table 3: All LUs, Seral situation as of Dec 3, 2006 Landscape - - (AU) Actual Target (<%) (.8) (0.8) - CWH vm - AU CWH vm CWH vm MH mm AU4 (.0) (.6) - - AU (6.7) (3.3) - - AU MH mm - AU (3.7) () - - AU3 0 - CWH vm - AU3 0 - CWH vm - AU4 (.0) (24.5) - - (.0) (4.) - - (.0) (0.6) - CWH vm -.6 (23.4) (.7) - CWH vm - AU 8.0 (7.0) (24.) - CWH vm - AU (.5) (.9) - MH mm CWH vm CWH vm MH mm CWH vm - AU2 2.8 (5.2) (.0) MH mm CWH vm CWH vm AU AU2 (.0) (5.3) MH wh MH wh AU (.0) (42.) - - AU (.0) (3.) - - AU4 (.0) (0.6) - MH wh AU3 0 - CWH vm - AU3 0 - CWH vm - AU4 (.0) (0.6) - CWH vm - (.0) (2.) - - (.0) (.) - CWH vm CWH vm CWH vm - AU MH mm CWH vm - AU MH mm CWH vm CWH vm - AU CWH vm AU

26 Table 3: All LUs, Seral situation as of Dec 3, 2006 Landscape - - (AU) Actual Target (<%) - MH mm MH wh - (.0) (22.7) (2.8) (2.5) - MH wh MH wh AU AU (.0) (3.6) - - AU AU MH mm - AU (0.5) () - MH wh Butedale - - (.0) () Butedale - MH mm - (.0) () Butedale - - (.0) (0.) Butedale - MH mm - (.0) (0.6) Butedale - CWH vm (.2) () Butedale - - (.0) () Butedale - MH wh - (.0) (0.5) Campania - MH wh - (.0) (0.8) Campania - MH wh - (.0) (3.2) Campania - - AU2 0.6 (.4) (3000.5) Campania (3.3) (53.5) Campania Campania Campania - MH wh - AU2 (.0) (43.6) - - AU3 0 - MH wh (0.4) (2.) MH wh AU AU MH wh MH wh MH mm - AU AU3 0 - CWH vm - AU (.0) () - - (.0) (2.5) - CWH vm (4.9) (5.2) - CWH vm - AU CWH vm CWH vm - AU MH mm CWH vm MH mm AU MH mm CWH vm CWH vm - AU CWH vm MH wh (8.5) (52.0) 26

27 Table 3: All LUs, Seral situation as of Dec 3, 2006 Landscape - - (AU) Actual Target (<%) - - AU MH wh AU AU AU AU Chapple - - AU3 0 Chapple - - (.0) (4.7) Chapple - - (.0) (0.9) Chapple - - AU2.4 (27.6) (538.9) Chapple - MH wh - 9. (9.9) (00.9) Chapple - MH wh (8.3) (76.0) Chapple Chapple Chapple Chapple Chapple - - AU0 (.0) (36.2) Chapple - - AU 4.5 (44.5) (3.7) Chapple - - AU4 63 (63.0) (43.9) Chapple - MH wh - AU2 (.0) (6.8) Chapple - MH wh - (.0) (0.8) Chapple - MH wh Dundas - - (.0) (.0) Dundas - - AU Dundas Dundas Dundas Dundas - - AU (.0) (5.4) Gil - MH wh - AU3 0 Gil - - AU Gil - - AU2 3.3 (.7) (88.) Gil - MH wh (.6) (2.0) Gil - MH wh Gil Gil Gil Gil Gil - - AU Gil - MH wh - AU2 (.0) (53.6) Gil - MH wh AU (.0) (89.6) - MH wh AU MH wh AU0 5.3 (7.7) (2.8) - - AU MH wh (.4) (5.3) - MH wh (36.7) (24.7) - MH wh - AU MH wh - n/a - - AU3 0 27

28 Table 3: All LUs, Seral situation as of Dec 3, 2006 Landscape - - (AU) Actual Target (<%) (5.3) (2.9) MH mm MH mm AU MH wh MH wh AU0 5. (7.9) (2.7) - - AU MH wh - 3. (54.9) (9.2) - MH wh MH wh - AU (.0) (8.2) MH wh AU MH wh AU AU MH wh (6.2) (5.6) - MH wh - AU Helmcken - - AU3 0 Helmcken Helmcken - - AU2 9.6 (9.4) (5.2) Helmcken (0.9) (355.8) Helmcken - MH wh (0.6) (98.0) Helmcken - MH wh Helmcken Helmcken Helmcken Helmcken - - AU Helmcken - - AU Helmcken - MH wh AU (.0) (6.2) - - AU2 4. (24.9) (380.) MH wh MH wh AU AU4 63 (63.0) (7.8) - MH wh - AU2 (.0) (7.5) - MH wh MH wh Iknouk - CWH wm - 0 Iknouk - MH mm Johnston - CWH vm - AU3 0 Johnston - - AU3 0 Johnston - CWH vm - (.0) (22.3)

29 Table 3: All LUs, Seral situation as of Dec 3, 2006 Landscape - - (AU) Actual Target (<%) Johnston - - (.0) (0.6) Johnston - CWH vm - AU Johnston - MH mm Johnston - CWH vm Johnston Johnston - CWH vm Johnston Johnston - CWH vm - AU Johnston - MH mm Johnston - CWH vm (5.0) (5.) Johnston - CWH vm Johnston Johnston - MH mm Johnston - CWH vm - AU Johnston - - AU Johnston - - AU Johnston - MH mm - AU AU3 0 - MH wh - AU (.0) (66.2) - CWH vm - (.0) (.2) - - (.0) () - CWH vm MH mm CWH vm AU MH wh MH wh AU0 (.0) (47.9) - - AU 33.8 (.2) (42.5) - - AU4 63 (63.0) (4.2) - MH wh - AU (32.3) (5.6) - MH wh CWH vm - AU AU (.0) (0.6) - CWH vm - AU0 5.8 (9.2) (2.0) - CWH vm (5.6) (7.6) - CWH vm - AU MH mm CWH vm CWH vm MH mm MH mm CWH vm - AU CWH vm AU AU AU MH mm - AU (4.0) (5.4) - MH mm - AU n/a Khutzeymateen Park - CWH vm - AU3 0

30 Table 3: All LUs, Seral situation as of Dec 3, 2006 Landscape - - (AU) Actual Target (<%) Khutzeymateen Park - CWH wm - AU3 0 Khutzeymateen Park - MH mm - AU Khutzeymateen Park - CWH vm - AU Khutzeymateen Park - MH mm Khutzeymateen Park - MH mm Khutzeymateen Park - CWH vm Khutzeymateen Park Khutzeymateen Park - CWH wm Khutzeymateen Park - CWH vm Khutzeymateen Park Khutzeymateen Park - CWH wm Khutzeymateen Park - CWH vm - AU Khutzeymateen Park - CWH vm Khutzeymateen Park - - AU2 (.0) (.3) Khutzeymateen Park - CWH vm - AU Khutzeymateen Park - MH mm Khutzeymateen Park - CWH vm Khutzeymateen Park Khutzeymateen Park - CWH wm - AU Khutzeymateen Park - CWH wm - AU Khutzeymateen Park - CWH wm Khutzeymateen Park - MH mm - AU Khutzeymateen Park - CWH wm Khutzeymateen Park - CWH wm Khutzeymateen Park - CWH wm - AU (9.4) (4.) Khutzeymateen Park - MH mm - AU n/a - CWH vm - AU AU3 0 - CWH vm - (.0) (30.) - - (.0) (3.5) - MH mm CWH vm - AU CWH vm - AU CWH vm CWH vm MH mm CWH vm - AU (0.8) (2.5) - MH mm CWH vm AU CWH vm MH wh (5.3) (0.) (6.6) () MH mm - (.0) (2.7) - - AU MH mm - AU Kiltuish - CWH vm Kiltuish - CWH vm Kiltuish Kiltuish Kiltuish - MH mm Kiltuish - CWH vm Kiltuish Kiltuish - MH mm Kiltuish - - AU

31 Table 3: All LUs, Seral situation as of Dec 3, 2006 Landscape - - (AU) Actual Target (<%) Kiltuish - CWH vm - AU2 0.4 Kitkiata - - AU3 0 Kitkiata - CWH vm - AU3 0 Kitkiata - - (.0) (2.7) Kitkiata - - (.0) (.8) Kitkiata - CWH vm (2.5) (65.3) Kitkiata - CWH vm - AU Kitkiata - CWH vm Kitkiata - MH mm Kitkiata Kitkiata Kitkiata - CWH vm Kitkiata - MH mm - 0 Kitkiata - CWH vm - (.0) (.6) Kitkiata Kitkiata - CWH vm Kitkiata - MH mm Kitkiata - CWH vm - AU Kitkiata - CWH vm Kitkiata - - AU Kitkiata Kitkiata - - AU Kitkiata Kitkiata Kitkiata - MH wh Kitkiata - MH wh Kitkiata - MH wh ESSFwv MH mm CWH ws - AU3 0 - CWH ws 2 - AU3 0 - CWH wm - (.0) (4.7) - CWH wm (5.4) (.0) - MH mm MH mm MH mm CWH ws CWH ws CWH ws 2 - AU2 (.0) (2.3) - CWH ws CWH ws - AU (.0) (3.9) - CWH wm - (.0) (0.8) - CWH ws - AU0 3.7 (27.3) (2.5) - CWH ws (9.9) (320.5) - CWH ws CWH ws 2 - AU 60 (6) (6.7) - CWH ws (.4) (73.3) - CWH ws CWH ws 2 - AU MH mm 2 - AU2 65 (65.0) (0.) - CWH ws - AU MH mm Klekane - CWH vm - AU3 0 Klekane - CWH vm - AU (.0) (0.4) Klekane - MH mm - (.0) (24.0) Klekane (24.6) (3) Klekane - CWH vm (5.) (7.7) Klekane Klekane - CWH vm Klekane - MH mm

32 Table 3: All LUs, Seral situation as of Dec 3, 2006 Landscape - - (AU) Actual Target (<%) Klekane - CWH vm - AU2 (.0) (2.4) Klekane - - AU2 (.0) (0.5) Klekane - MH mm - (27.8) (.4) Klekane (9.0) (83.4) Klekane - CWH vm Klekane - CWH vm Klekane Kshwan - CWH wm - AU3 0 Kshwan - CWH wm Kshwan - MH mm Kshwan - CWH wm Kshwan - MH mm Kshwan - MH mm Kshwan - CWH wm - AU (.0) (75.) Kshwan - CWH wm - AU Kshwan - CWH wm Kshwan - CWH wm Kshwan - CWH wm - AU2 6.5 (6.5) (69.3) - - AU (24.5) (86.5) - CWH vm MH mm CWH vm AU MH mm AU MH wh MH wh AU0 5.7 (53.3) (47.6) - - AU 2 (39.0) (20.4) - - AU4 63 (63.0) (58.7) - MH mm - AU MH wh - (.0) (3.7) - MH wh MH wh MH wh - AU MH wh - n/a - CWH vm - AU AU3 0 - CWH vm MH mm CWH vm - AU CWH vm CWH vm - AU CWH vm MH mm AU MH mm CWH vm - AU

33 Table 3: All LUs, Seral situation as of Dec 3, 2006 Landscape - - (AU) Actual Target (<%) - CWH vm CWH vm AU0 54. (4.9) (0.8) - - AU MH mm - AU Laredo - - AU3 0 Laredo - MH mm (6.5) (8.8) Laredo Laredo - CWH vm Laredo Laredo - CWH vm Laredo - MH mm - (.0) (.8) Laredo - CWH vm - (.0) (.) Laredo - - (.0) (0.7) Laredo - CWH vm - 0. Laredo - MH wh (8.6) (56.8) Laredo (4.9) (678.5) Laredo - - AU Laredo - MH wh Laredo Laredo Laredo Laredo - - AU Laredo - - AU Laredo - MH wh Marmot - CWH wm - AU3 0 Marmot - CWH wm Marmot - MH mm Marmot - CWH wm Marmot - MH mm Marmot - MH mm Marmot - CWH wm - AU (.0) (8.2) Marmot - CWH wm Marmot - CWH wm - AU Marmot - MH mm Marmot - CWH wm Marmot - MH mm - AU Marmot - CWH wm Marmot - CWH wm - AU (4.8) (5.6) McCauley - - AU3 0 McCauley - - AU2 3.6 (.4) (4.3) McCauley (2.) (57.4) McCauley McCauley McCauley Monckton - - AU3 0 Monckton - - AU2 3.3 (.7) (362.2) Monckton - MH wh (24.3) (2.7) Monckton (8.8) (854.4) Monckton - MH wh (2.7) (7.9) Monckton Monckton Monckton Monckton - - AU Monckton - MH wh - 0 Monckton - MH wh Observatory East - CWH wm - AU3 0 Observatory East - CWH wm Observatory East - CWH wm

34 Table 3: All LUs, Seral situation as of Dec 3, 2006 Landscape - - (AU) Actual Target (<%) Observatory East - MH mm Observatory East - MH mm Observatory East - CWH wm - (.0) (8.9) Observatory East - CWH wm - AU Observatory East - CWH wm (20.7) (6.9) Observatory East - CWH wm - AU (23.3) (4.0) Observatory West - - AU3 0 Observatory West - CWH wm - AU3 0 Observatory West - MH mm - (.0) (2.7) Observatory West - CWH wm (0.4) (5.0) Observatory West - CWH wm Observatory West - MH mm Observatory West - MH mm Observatory West - - AU2 (.0) (6.9) Observatory West Observatory West Observatory West Observatory West - MH wh Observatory West - CWH wm - AU (.0) (0.6) Observatory West - CWH wm Observatory West - CWH wm - AU2 (.0) (4.9) Olh - CWH wm - AU3 0 Olh - CWH wm (6.7) (384.9) Olh - MH mm - 2. (3.9) (74.) Olh - CWH wm Olh - MH mm Olh - MH mm Olh - CWH ws Olh - MH mm Olh - CWH wm - AU (.0) (4.2) Olh - CWH wm - (.0) (42.2) Olh - MH mm - AU2 65 (65.0) (6.6) Olh - CWH wm (48.0) (6.) Olh - CWH wm - AU2 (.0) (4.8) - - AU (23.6) (30.6) - MH wh AU MH wh AU MH wh Pearse - - AU Pearse - - AU Pearse - MH wh Pearse Pearse - MH wh Pearse Pearse Pearse Pearse - - AU Pearse - - AU Pearse - MH wh AU (.0) (35.5) MH wh

35 Table 3: All LUs, Seral situation as of Dec 3, 2006 Landscape - - (AU) Actual Target (<%) AU MH wh AU0 (.0) (3.2) - MH wh - AU (.0) (0.) - - AU 5.3 (53.7) (22.2) - MH wh - AU (.7) (2.3) - MH wh MH mm - AU AU3 0 - CWH vm - AU AU (.0) (26.0) - CWH vm - (.0) (2) - CWH vm - AU CWH vm CWH vm - AU MH mm CWH vm MH mm AU CWH vm - AU MH mm CWH vm CWH vm MH wh AU MH wh MH wh - AU (.0) (9.8) - - AU4 (.0) (.2) - MH mm - AU4 (.0) (8.7) - - AU (24.) (2.9) - - AU AU AU MH mm MH mm - AU (6.6) (2.) - MH mm MH wh - AU2 3. (36.9) (2.4) - MH wh MH wh AU (8.3) (23.9) - - AU2 2. (7.9) (5.8) MH wh MH wh

36 Table 3: All LUs, Seral situation as of Dec 3, 2006 Landscape - - (AU) Actual Target (<%) - - AU MH wh CWH vm - AU AU3 0 - CWH vm - AU4 (.0) () - - (.0) (.6) - CWH vm - (.0) (.5) - - (.0) (22.2) - CWH vm - AU0.9 (3.) (33.3) - MH mm CWH vm - AU CWH vm CWH vm MH mm CWH vm - AU AU MH mm CWH vm CWH vm MH wh MH wh AU MH mm - AU MH wh MH wh Skeena Islands - CWH vm - AU3 0 Skeena Islands - - AU3 0 Skeena Islands - CWH vm - (.0) (9.2) Skeena Islands - - (.0) () Skeena Islands - MH mm - (.0) (0.7) Skeena Islands - CWH vm - AU 2. (2.9) (.8) Skeena Islands - CWH vm - AU0 3.6 (.4) (6.5) Skeena Islands - MH mm Skeena Islands - CWH vm Skeena Islands Skeena Islands Skeena Islands - CWH vm Skeena Islands - CWH vm (9.3) (6.9) Skeena Islands - CWH vm Skeena Islands - CWH vm - AU Skeena Islands Skeena Islands - MH mm CWH vm - AU AU (.0) (8.) - CWH vm (22.5) (36.7) - CWH vm - AU CWH vm - AU CWH vm MH mm CWH vm

37 Table 3: All LUs, Seral situation as of Dec 3, 2006 Landscape - - (AU) Actual Target (<%) - MH mm CWH vm - AU AU CWH vm CWH vm - AU MH mm CWH vm MH wh (.3) (0.4) MH wh AU MH mm - (.0) (0.5) - - AU AU MH mm - AU (33.2) (.) - MH wh MH mm - AU0 n/a - MH mm - AU n/a Sparkling - CWH vm - AU3 0 Sparkling - CWH vm - AU0 (.0) (.2) Sparkling - MH mm Sparkling Sparkling - CWH vm Sparkling - CWH vm Sparkling - CWH vm Sparkling Sparkling - MH mm Sparkling - CWH vm - AU Sparkling Sparkling - CWH vm Sparkling - MH mm Sparkling - - AU Sparkling Sparkling - CWH vm Sparkling - CWH vm - AU Sparkling - MH wh Sparkling - - AU Sparkling - - AU Sparkling - MH mm - AU Stagoo - CWH ws - AU3 0 Stagoo - CWH wm - AU Stagoo - MH mm Stagoo - MH mm Stagoo - CWH wm Stagoo - CWH wm Stagoo - MH mm Stagoo - CWH ws Stagoo - MH mm Stagoo - CWH wm - AU (.0) (5.0) Stagoo - CWH ws - (.0) (8.8) Stagoo - MH mm - (.0) (.) Stagoo - CWH ws (47.0) (4.3) Stagoo - CWH wm - AU (5.3) (24.) Stagoo - CWH wm Stagoo - CWH ws (32.2) (30.4) Stagoo - MH mm - AU (35.5) (8.) 37

38 Table 3: All LUs, Seral situation as of Dec 3, 2006 Landscape - - (AU) Actual Target (<%) Stagoo - CWH wm Stagoo - CWH wm Stagoo - CWH wm - AU (33.4) (82.7) Stagoo - CWH ws - AU2 65 (65.0) (9.) Stephens - - (.0) (.6) Stephens - - AU2 0.5 (8.5) (464.8) Stephens Stephens AU3 0 - CWH vm - AU3 0 - MH wh - AU3 0 - CWH vm - AU4 (.0) (0.6) - MH mm (2) (8.2) - MH mm (3.5) () CWH vm CWH vm CWH vm - AU2 (.0) (7.2) - MH mm (9.0) (3) (0.9) (.3) - CWH vm CWH vm AU2 8.9 (20.) (9.7) - MH wh (4.8) (84.7) - MH wh (9.) (0.9) AU0 (.0) (0.6) - - AU 38.7 (2) (8.5) - MH mm MH wh (22.3) (5.4) - MH wh Tolmie - - AU2 (.0) (4.4) Tolmie - MH wh (.5) (7.2) Tolmie (4.9) (5.9) Tolmie Tolmie - MH wh Tolmie Tolmie Tolmie - - AU4 63 (63.0) (3.0) - CWH vm - AU AU3 0 - CWH vm - AU4 (.0) (3.) - CWH vm - (.0) (66.0) - - (.0) (9.0) - MH mm (4.2) (3.8) CWH vm CWH vm MH mm CWH vm - AU CWH vm - AU CWH vm - AU2 5.3 (22.7) (5.) (7.9) (35.4) - - AU2 6.3 (.7) () 38

39 Table 3: All LUs, Seral situation as of Dec 3, 2006 Landscape - - (AU) Actual Target (<%) - CWH vm MH mm CWH vm AU0 (.0) (3.8) - - AU4 (.0) (0.9) - MH mm - (.0) () - - AU MH mm - 65 (65.0) (.3) Trutch - - AU2.8 (7.2) (23.2) Trutch (6.7) (749.5) Trutch Trutch AU3 0 - MH wh - AU (.0) (3.2) - - AU MH wh MH wh AU0 (.0) (.0) - - AU 54.4 (4.6) (7.7) - MH wh - AU MH wh MH wh AU3 0 - CWH vm - AU AU (.0) (3.5) - - (.0) (0.) - CWH vm - AU MH mm CWH vm CWH vm CWH vm - AU MH mm AU CWH vm - AU MH mm CWH vm CWH vm MH wh MH wh AU MH mm - (.0) (4.) - - AU 9.9 (39.) (26.3) - - AU 48.4 (0.6) (4.0) - - AU MH wh - AU

40 Table 3: All LUs, Seral situation as of Dec 3, 2006 Landscape - - (AU) Actual Target (<%) - MH mm - AU MH wh - AU (.8) (2.7) - MH wh AU AU3 0 - MH mm - AU3 0 - CWH vm - AU CWH vm - AU4 (.0) (7.7) - - (.0) (2.0) - CWH vm - (.0) (57.0) - - (.0) (0.) - MH mm (5.3) (80.8) (4.3) (08.5) - CWH vm - AU0 24. (0.9) (0.9) - CWH vm CWH vm MH mm CWH vm - AU AU2 2.8 (.2) (0.4) - MH mm (.2) (344.7) (2.5) (353.7) - CWH vm CWH vm CWH vm - AU MH wh (23.4) (57.8) - MH wh (5.2) (55.2) - - AU2 9.4 (9.6) (3.9) AU0 (.0) (3.) - - AU 32.9 (26.) (.3) - - AU 36.6 (22.4) (2.7) - MH wh MH wh - AU MH wh

41 Table 4: All LUs, Seral situation as of Dec 3, 20 Table 4: All LUs, Seral situation as of Dec 3, 20 Landscape - - (AU) Actual Target (<%) Anyox - CWH wm - AU2 (.0) (.5) Anyox - CWH wm - AU3 0 Anyox - CWH wm (52.5) (272.2) Anyox - CWH wm - (.0) (.) Anyox - CWH wm - (.0) (304.5) Anyox - CWH wm (22.) () Anyox - MH mm Anyox - MH mm - (.0) () Anyox - MH mm (6.4) (08.6) Aristazabal - - AU0 (.0) (2.9) Aristazabal - - AU2.8 (27.2) (42.5) Aristazabal Aristazabal (4.7) (702.3) Aristazabal Aristazabal Banks - - AU Banks - - AU3 0 Banks Banks Banks - - (.0) (3.6) Banks Banks Banks - MH wh - AU2 0. Banks - MH wh Banks - MH wh Belle Bay - - AU Belle Bay Belle Bay Belle Bay Belle Bay Belle Bay - CWH wm - AU Belle Bay - CWH wm - AU Belle Bay - CWH wm - AU Belle Bay - CWH wm - AU3 0 Belle Bay - CWH wm (5.4) (5.6) Belle Bay - CWH wm Belle Bay - CWH wm (4.6) (.8) Belle Bay - CWH wm Belle Bay - CWH wm Belle Bay - MH mm Belle Bay - MH mm Belle Bay - MH wh Belle Bay - MH wh Belle Bay - MH wh CWH vm - AU0.4 (23.6) (79.6) - CWH vm - AU 7.5 (7.5) (20.8) - CWH vm - AU CWH vm - AU3 0 - CWH vm - AU4 (.0) (3.4) - CWH vm CWH vm CWH vm (2.5) (83.6) - CWH vm CWH vm AU (6.7) (3.3) - - AU

42 Table 4: All LUs, Seral situation as of Dec 3, 20 Landscape - - (AU) Actual Target (<%) - - AU2 2.3 (5.7) (9.6) - - AU AU4 (.0) (.6) (.8) (0.8) (20.5) (7.7) MH mm - AU (3.7) () - MH mm MH mm MH mm AU (.0) (42.) - - AU2 (.0) (5.3) - - AU (.0) (4.) CWH vm - AU (.8) (2.4) - CWH vm - AU 8.0 (7.0) (24.) - CWH vm - AU2 2.8 (5.2) (.0) - CWH vm - AU3 0 - CWH vm - AU4 (.0) (24.5) - CWH vm CWH vm CWH vm -.6 (23.4) (.7) - CWH vm CWH vm AU (.0) (3.) - - AU AU4 (.0) (0.6) (.0) (0.6) MH mm MH mm MH mm MH wh MH wh -.7 (39.3) (.4) - MH wh AU (.0) (3.6) - - AU AU (2.8) (2.5) CWH vm - AU CWH vm - AU CWH vm - AU CWH vm - AU3 0 - CWH vm - AU4 (.0) (0.6) - CWH vm CWH vm CWH vm - (.0) (2.) - CWH vm CWH vm

43 Table 4: All LUs, Seral situation as of Dec 3, 20 Landscape - - (AU) Actual Target (<%) - - AU AU AU (.0) (.) MH mm - AU (0.5) () - MH mm MH mm MH mm MH wh MH wh MH wh Butedale - - (.0) () Butedale - CWH vm (.2) () Butedale - - (.0) (0.) Butedale - - (.0) () Butedale - MH mm - (.0) (0.6) Butedale - MH mm - (.0) () Butedale - MH wh - (.0) (0.5) Campania - - AU2 0.6 (.4) (3000.5) Campania (3.3) (53.5) Campania Campania Campania - MH wh - AU2 (.0) (43.6) Campania - MH wh - (.0) (0.8) Campania - MH wh - (.0) (3.2) - - AU AU AU MH wh MH wh (0.4) (2.) - MH wh MH wh AU AU AU AU (.0) () CWH vm - AU CWH vm - AU CWH vm - AU CWH vm - AU3 0 - CWH vm CWH vm CWH vm (4.9) (5.2) - CWH vm CWH vm AU0 9.4 (39.6) (0.) - - AU

44 Table 4: All LUs, Seral situation as of Dec 3, 20 Landscape - - (AU) Actual Target (<%) - - AU (.0) (2.5) MH mm - AU 0 - MH mm MH mm MH mm MH wh (8.5) (52.0) - MH wh Chapple - - AU0 (.0) (36.2) Chapple - - AU 4.5 (44.5) (3.7) Chapple - - AU2.4 (27.6) (538.9) Chapple - - AU3 0 Chapple - - AU4 63 (63.0) (43.9) Chapple Chapple Chapple - - (.0) (4.7) Chapple Chapple Chapple - MH wh - AU2 (.0) (6.8) Chapple - MH wh - (.0) (0.8) Chapple - MH wh - 9. (9.9) (00.9) Chapple - MH wh Chapple - MH wh (8.3) (76.0) Dundas - - AU (.0) (5.4) Dundas - - AU Dundas - - (.0) (.0) Dundas Dundas Dundas Gil - - AU Gil - - AU2 3.3 (.7) (88.) Gil - - AU Gil Gil Gil Gil Gil - MH wh - AU2 (.0) (53.6) Gil - MH wh - AU3 0 Gil - MH wh (.6) (2.0) Gil - MH wh Gil - MH wh AU0 5.3 (7.7) (2.8) - - AU 54.6 (4.4) (2.3) - - AU AU (.0) (89.6) MH wh - AU MH wh (.4) (5.3) - MH wh MH wh - n/a - MH wh (36.7) (24.7) - MH wh AU0 5. (7.9) (2.7) 44

45 Table 4: All LUs, Seral situation as of Dec 3, 20 Landscape - - (AU) Actual Target (<%) - - AU AU AU (5.3) (2.9) MH mm MH mm MH wh - AU MH wh MH wh MH wh - 3. (54.9) (9.2) - MH wh AU AU AU (.0) (8.2) MH wh - AU MH wh MH wh (6.2) (5.6) - MH wh Helmcken - - AU Helmcken - - AU Helmcken - - AU2 9.6 (9.4) (5.2) Helmcken - - AU3 0 Helmcken Helmcken (0.9) (3.7) Helmcken Helmcken Helmcken Helmcken - MH wh (0.6) (98.0) Helmcken - MH wh - 0. Helmcken - MH wh AU AU2 4. (24.9) (380.) - - AU AU4 63 (63.0) (7.8) (.0) (6.2) MH wh - AU2 (.0) (7.5) - MH wh MH wh MH wh MH wh Iknouk - CWH wm - 0 Iknouk - MH mm Johnston - CWH vm - AU Johnston - CWH vm - AU Johnston - CWH vm - AU

46 Table 4: All LUs, Seral situation as of Dec 3, 20 Landscape - - (AU) Actual Target (<%) Johnston - CWH vm - AU3 0 Johnston - CWH vm (5.0) (5.) Johnston - CWH vm Johnston - CWH vm - (.0) (22.3) Johnston - CWH vm Johnston - CWH vm Johnston - - AU Johnston - - AU Johnston - - AU3 0 Johnston Johnston - - (.0) (0.6) Johnston Johnston Johnston - MH mm - AU Johnston - MH mm Johnston - MH mm Johnston - MH mm AU0 (.0) (47.9) - - AU 2.3 (37.7) (63.4) - - AU AU AU4 63 (63.0) (4.2) (.0) (66.2) CWH vm CWH vm - (.0) (.2) - CWH vm (.0) () - MH mm MH wh - AU (32.3) (5.6) - MH wh - AU3 0 - MH wh MH wh MH wh CWH vm - AU0 5.8 (9.2) (2.0) - CWH vm - AU CWH vm - AU CWH vm - AU3 0 - CWH vm CWH vm (5.6) (7.6) - CWH vm CWH vm AU AU AU AU (.0) (0.6) MH mm - AU n/a - MH mm - AU (4.0) (5.4) - MH mm MH mm MH mm Khutzeymateen Park - CWH vm - AU

47 Table 4: All LUs, Seral situation as of Dec 3, 20 Landscape - - (AU) Actual Target (<%) Khutzeymateen Park - CWH vm - AU Khutzeymateen Park - CWH vm - AU Khutzeymateen Park - CWH vm - AU3 0 Khutzeymateen Park - CWH vm Khutzeymateen Park - CWH vm Khutzeymateen Park - CWH vm Khutzeymateen Park - CWH vm Khutzeymateen Park - - AU2 (.0) (.3) Khutzeymateen Park Khutzeymateen Park Khutzeymateen Park Khutzeymateen Park - CWH wm - AU Khutzeymateen Park - CWH wm - AU Khutzeymateen Park - CWH wm - AU (9.4) (4.) Khutzeymateen Park - CWH wm - AU3 0 Khutzeymateen Park - CWH wm Khutzeymateen Park - CWH wm Khutzeymateen Park - CWH wm Khutzeymateen Park - CWH wm Khutzeymateen Park - CWH wm Khutzeymateen Park - MH mm - AU n/a Khutzeymateen Park - MH mm - AU Khutzeymateen Park - MH mm - AU Khutzeymateen Park - MH mm Khutzeymateen Park - MH mm Khutzeymateen Park - MH mm (6.6) () - CWH vm - AU CWH vm - AU CWH vm - AU (0.8) (2.5) - CWH vm - AU3 0 - CWH vm CWH vm CWH vm - (.0) (30.) - CWH vm CWH vm AU AU AU (.0) (3.5) MH mm - AU MH mm MH mm - (.0) (2.7) - MH mm MH mm MH wh (5.3) (0.) Kiltuish - CWH vm - AU2 0.4 Kiltuish - CWH vm Kiltuish - CWH vm Kiltuish - CWH vm Kiltuish - - AU2 0.0 Kiltuish Kiltuish Kiltuish Kiltuish - MH mm

48 Table 4: All LUs, Seral situation as of Dec 3, 20 Landscape - - (AU) Actual Target (<%) Kiltuish - MH mm Kitkiata - - AU Kitkiata - - AU3 0 Kitkiata Kitkiata - - (.0) (2.7) Kitkiata Kitkiata Kitkiata - CWH vm - AU Kitkiata - CWH vm - AU Kitkiata - CWH vm - AU3 0 Kitkiata - CWH vm Kitkiata - CWH vm Kitkiata - CWH vm (2.5) (65.3) Kitkiata - CWH vm Kitkiata - CWH vm Kitkiata - - AU Kitkiata Kitkiata - - (.0) (.8) Kitkiata Kitkiata Kitkiata - MH mm Kitkiata - MH mm - 0 Kitkiata - MH mm Kitkiata - MH wh Kitkiata - MH wh - 0 Kitkiata - MH wh CWH wm - (.0) (0.8) - CWH wm - (.0) (4.7) - CWH wm (5.4) (.0) - CWH ws - AU0 3.7 (27.3) (2.5) - CWH ws - AU (.0) (3.9) - CWH ws - AU CWH ws - AU3 0 - CWH ws CWH ws (9.6) (3.6) - CWH ws (.4) (73.3) - CWH ws 2 - AU CWH ws 2 - AU 60 (6) (6.7) - CWH ws 2 - AU2 (.0) (2.3) - CWH ws 2 - AU3 0 - CWH ws CWH ws CWH ws CWH ws ESSFwv - 26 (26.0) () - MH mm MH mm 2 - AU2 65 (65.0) (0.) - MH mm MH mm 2 - n/a - MH mm MH mm Klekane - CWH vm - AU (.0) (0.4) Klekane - CWH vm - AU2 (.0) (2.4) Klekane - CWH vm - AU3 0 Klekane - CWH vm Klekane - CWH vm Klekane - CWH vm Klekane - CWH vm (5.) (7.7) Klekane - - AU2 (.0) (0.5) Klekane

49 Table 4: All LUs, Seral situation as of Dec 3, 20 Landscape - - (AU) Actual Target (<%) Klekane (9.0) (83.4) Klekane Klekane (24.6) (3) Klekane - MH mm - (27.8) (.4) Klekane - MH mm Klekane - MH mm - (.0) (24.0) Kshwan - CWH wm - AU Kshwan - CWH wm - AU (.0) (75.) Kshwan - CWH wm - AU2 6.5 (6.5) (69.3) Kshwan - CWH wm - AU3 0 Kshwan - CWH wm Kshwan - CWH wm Kshwan - CWH wm Kshwan - CWH wm Kshwan - MH mm Kshwan - MH mm Kshwan - MH mm AU0 5.7 (53.3) (47.6) - - AU 2 (39.0) (20.4) - - AU AU AU4 63 (63.0) (58.7) (4.6) (5.6) CWH vm CWH vm AU MH mm - AU MH mm MH mm MH wh - AU MH wh MH wh MH wh - n/a - MH wh MH wh CWH vm - AU CWH vm - AU CWH vm - AU CWH vm - AU3 0 - CWH vm CWH vm CWH vm CWH vm CWH vm AU0 54. (4.9) (0.8) - - AU AU AU

50 Table 4: All LUs, Seral situation as of Dec 3, 20 Landscape - - (AU) Actual Target (<%) - MH mm - AU MH mm MH mm MH mm Laredo - - AU Laredo - - AU Laredo - - AU Laredo - - AU3 0 Laredo Laredo (4.9) (678.5) Laredo Laredo Laredo Laredo - CWH vm - 0. Laredo - CWH vm - (.0) (.) Laredo - CWH vm Laredo - CWH vm Laredo - - (.0) (0.7) Laredo Laredo - MH mm - (.0) (.8) Laredo - MH mm (6.5) (8.8) Laredo - MH wh (8.6) (56.8) Laredo - MH wh Laredo - MH wh Marmot - CWH wm - AU Marmot - CWH wm - AU (.0) (8.2) Marmot - CWH wm - AU (4.8) (5.6) Marmot - CWH wm - AU3 0 Marmot - CWH wm Marmot - CWH wm Marmot - CWH wm Marmot - CWH wm Marmot - CWH wm Marmot - MH mm - AU Marmot - MH mm Marmot - MH mm Marmot - MH mm Marmot - MH mm McCauley - - AU2 3.6 (.4) (4.3) McCauley - - AU3 0 McCauley McCauley (2.) (57.4) McCauley McCauley Monckton - - AU Monckton - - AU2 3.3 (.7) (362.2) Monckton - - AU3 0 Monckton Monckton (8.8) (854.4) Monckton Monckton Monckton - MH wh - 0 Monckton - MH wh (24.3) (2.7) Monckton - MH wh Monckton - MH wh (2.7) (7.9) Observatory East - CWH wm - AU Observatory East - CWH wm - AU (23.3) (4.0) Observatory East - CWH wm - AU3 0 Observatory East - CWH wm (20.7) (6.9) Observatory East - CWH wm - (.0) (8.9)

51 Table 4: All LUs, Seral situation as of Dec 3, 20 Landscape - - (AU) Actual Target (<%) Observatory East - CWH wm Observatory East - CWH wm Observatory East - MH mm Observatory East - MH mm Observatory West - - AU2 (.0) (6.9) Observatory West - - AU3 0 Observatory West Observatory West Observatory West Observatory West - CWH wm - AU (.0) (0.6) Observatory West - CWH wm - AU2 (.0) (4.9) Observatory West - CWH wm - AU3 0 Observatory West - CWH wm Observatory West - CWH wm (0.4) (5.0) Observatory West - CWH wm Observatory West - MH mm Observatory West - MH mm - (.0) (2.7) Observatory West - MH mm Observatory West - MH wh Olh - CWH wm - AU (.0) (4.2) Olh - CWH wm - AU2 (.0) (4.8) Olh - CWH wm - AU3 0 Olh - CWH wm (48.0) (6.) Olh - CWH wm - (.0) (42.2) Olh - CWH wm Olh - CWH wm (3.3) (89.8) Olh - CWH ws Olh - MH mm - AU2 65 (65.0) (6.6) Olh - MH mm Olh - MH mm Olh - MH mm (2.3) (44.5) Olh - MH mm AU AU AU (23.6) (30.6) MH wh MH wh MH wh Pearse - - AU Pearse - - AU Pearse - - AU Pearse - - AU Pearse Pearse Pearse Pearse Pearse - MH wh Pearse - MH wh - 0 Pearse - MH wh AU0 (.0) (3.2) - - AU 5.3 (53.7) (22.2) - - AU AU (.0) (35.5) 5

52 Table 4: All LUs, Seral situation as of Dec 3, 20 Landscape - - (AU) Actual Target (<%) (0.6) (6.5) MH wh - AU (.0) (0.) - MH wh - AU (.7) (2.3) - MH wh MH wh MH wh AU (24.) (2.9) - - AU AU AU (.0) (26.0) CWH vm - AU CWH vm - AU CWH vm - AU CWH vm - AU3 0 - CWH vm CWH vm CWH vm - (.0) (2) - CWH vm CWH vm AU AU AU AU AU4 (.0) (.2) MH mm - AU 0 - MH mm - AU (6.6) (2.) - MH mm - AU4 (.0) (8.7) - MH mm MH mm MH mm MH mm MH mm MH wh - AU (.0) (9.8) - MH wh - AU2 3. (36.9) (2.4) - MH wh MH wh MH wh MH wh AU AU2 2 (8.8) (57.5) - - AU (8.3) (23.9) MH wh MH wh MH wh

53 Table 4: All LUs, Seral situation as of Dec 3, 20 Landscape - - (AU) Actual Target (<%) (.0) (.6) CWH vm - AU0.9 (3.) (33.3) - CWH vm - AU CWH vm - AU CWH vm - AU3 0 - CWH vm - AU4 (.0) () - CWH vm CWH vm CWH vm - (.0) (.5) - CWH vm CWH vm AU AU AU (.0) (22.2) MH mm - AU MH mm MH mm MH mm MH wh MH wh MH wh MH wh Skeena Islands - CWH vm - (.0) (0.9) Skeena Islands - CWH vm - AU0 3.6 (.4) (6.5) Skeena Islands - CWH vm - AU 2. (2.9) (.8) Skeena Islands - CWH vm - AU Skeena Islands - CWH vm - AU3 0 Skeena Islands - CWH vm (9.3) (6.9) Skeena Islands - CWH vm Skeena Islands - CWH vm - (.0) (9.2) Skeena Islands - CWH vm Skeena Islands - CWH vm Skeena Islands - - AU3 0 Skeena Islands Skeena Islands - - (.0) () Skeena Islands Skeena Islands Skeena Islands - MH mm Skeena Islands - MH mm - (.0) (0.7) Skeena Islands - MH mm AU CWH vm - AU CWH vm - AU CWH vm - AU CWH vm - AU3 0 - CWH vm - AU CWH vm CWH vm

54 Table 4: All LUs, Seral situation as of Dec 3, 20 Landscape - - (AU) Actual Target (<%) - CWH vm (22.5) (36.7) - CWH vm CWH vm AU AU AU AU (.0) (8.) MH mm - AU0 n/a - MH mm - AU n/a - MH mm - AU (33.2) (.) - MH mm MH mm - (.0) (0.5) - MH mm MH mm MH wh (.3) (0.4) - MH wh MH wh Sparkling - CWH vm - AU0 (.0) (.2) Sparkling - CWH vm - AU Sparkling - CWH vm - AU Sparkling - CWH vm - AU3 0 Sparkling - CWH vm Sparkling - CWH vm Sparkling - CWH vm Sparkling - CWH vm Sparkling - CWH vm Sparkling - - AU Sparkling - - AU Sparkling - - AU Sparkling Sparkling Sparkling Sparkling Sparkling - MH mm - AU Sparkling - MH mm Sparkling - MH mm Sparkling - MH mm Sparkling - MH wh Stagoo - CWH wm - AU (5.3) (24.) Stagoo - CWH wm - AU (.0) (5.0) Stagoo - CWH wm - AU (33.4) (82.7) Stagoo - CWH wm - AU Stagoo - CWH wm Stagoo - CWH wm Stagoo - CWH wm Stagoo - CWH wm Stagoo - CWH wm Stagoo - CWH ws - AU2 65 (65.0) (9.) Stagoo - CWH ws - AU3 0 Stagoo - CWH ws - (.0) (8.8) Stagoo - CWH ws (47.0) (4.3) Stagoo - CWH ws (32.2) (30.4) Stagoo - CWH ws Stagoo - MH mm - AU (35.5) (8.) Stagoo - MH mm Stagoo - MH mm - (.0) (.) 54

55 Table 4: All LUs, Seral situation as of Dec 3, 20 Landscape - - (AU) Actual Target (<%) Stagoo - MH mm Stagoo - MH mm Stagoo - MH mm Stephens - - AU (4.4) () Stephens - - (.0) (.6) Stephens Stephens AU0 (.0) (0.6) - - AU 38.7 (2) (8.5) - - AU2 8.9 (20.) (9.7) - - AU CWH vm - AU2 (.0) (7.2) - CWH vm - AU3 0 - CWH vm - AU4 (.0) (0.6) - CWH vm CWH vm CWH vm CWH vm (0.9) (.3) MH mm MH mm (9.0) (3) - MH mm (3.5) () - MH mm (2) (8.2) - MH wh - AU3 0 - MH wh MH wh (4.8) (84.7) - MH wh (22.3) (5.4) - MH wh (9.) (0.9) Tolmie - - AU2 (.0) (4.4) Tolmie - - AU4 63 (63.0) (3.0) Tolmie Tolmie (4.9) (5.9) Tolmie Tolmie Tolmie - MH wh (.5) (7.2) Tolmie - MH wh CWH vm - AU CWH vm - AU CWH vm - AU2 5.3 (22.7) (5.) - CWH vm - AU3 0 - CWH vm - AU4 (.0) (3.) - CWH vm CWH vm CWH vm - (.0) (66.0) - CWH vm CWH vm AU0 (.0) (3.8) - - AU AU2 6.3 (.7) () - - AU AU4 (.0) (0.9) (7.9) (35.4)

56 Table 4: All LUs, Seral situation as of Dec 3, 20 Landscape - - (AU) Actual Target (<%) - - (.0) (9.0) MH mm - 65 (65.0) (.3) - MH mm MH mm - (.0) () - MH mm (4.2) (3.8) - MH mm Trutch - - AU2.8 (7.2) (23.2) Trutch (6.7) (749.5) Trutch Trutch AU0 (.0) (.0) - - AU 54.4 (4.6) (7.7) - - AU AU (.0) (3.2) MH wh - AU MH wh - AU3 0 - MH wh MH wh MH wh MH wh AU 9.9 (39.) (26.3) - - AU AU (.0) (3.5) CWH vm - AU CWH vm - AU CWH vm - AU CWH vm - AU3 0 - CWH vm CWH vm CWH vm CWH vm AU AU 48.4 (0.6) (4.0) - - AU AU (.0) (0.) MH mm - AU MH mm MH mm - (.0) (4.) - MH mm MH mm MH wh - AU MH wh - AU (.8) (2.7) - MH wh

57 Table 4: All LUs, Seral situation as of Dec 3, 20 Landscape - - (AU) Actual Target (<%) - MH wh MH wh AU0 (.0) (3.) - - AU 36.6 (22.4) (2.7) - - AU2 9.4 (9.6) (3.9) - - AU (.0) (2.0) CWH vm - AU0 23. (.9) (.8) - CWH vm - AU CWH vm - AU CWH vm - AU CWH vm - AU4 (.0) (7.7) - CWH vm CWH vm CWH vm - (.0) (57.0) - CWH vm CWH vm AU 32.9 (26.) (.3) - - AU2 2.8 (.2) (0.4) - - AU (2.5) (353.9) - - (.0) (0.) (4.8) (9.6) - MH mm - AU3 0 - MH mm (.2) (344.7) - MH mm MH mm (5.3) (8.0) - MH wh - AU MH wh MH wh (23.4) (57.8) - MH wh MH wh (5.2) (55.2) 3..2 Seral Stage information for Licencee s that overlap with Landscape s Tables specific to each licencee are supplied in Appendix C. These tables will allow licencees to evaluate their achievement of proportional targets. The table formats are similar to those above in section

58 3.2 Ecosystem-Based Management (Central and North Coast Order) The Central and North Coast Order sets objectives for the implementation of ecosystembased management on the North Coast. This project provides data that can be used in measuring consistency with some of these objectives: important fisheries watersheds, upland streams, landscape level biodiversity, and critical grizzly bear habitat. Landscape level biodiversity is addressed in the seral stage analysis describe in Section 3. above, and the following sections discuss important fisheries watersheds, upland streams, and critical grizzly bear habitat Important Fisheries Watersheds The CNCO describes an objective that limits theamount of equivalent clearcut area (ECA) that may exist in areas identified as important fisheries watersheds. The data set that has been prepared for this project can also be used to determine consistency with this target. Calculation of equivalent clearcut area is based on a defined process, in which ECA is determined by evaluating the amount of hydrologically effective green-up (HEG). This project does not attempt to carry out the full ECA calculation; instead, a coarse filter approach is used to determine if a fisheries sensitive watershed is approaching the threshold where a full and detailed ECA calculation would be necessary. As a coarse filter we use a conservative surrogate definition for when hydrologically effective green-up is achieved: forests that are in the old, mature, mid-seral, and young age classes (i.e. forests that are > years old). See Appendix A for information related to how surogate hydrologicaly effective green-up (SHEG) is calculated. Within important fisheries watersheds, if the area of forest that meets the SHEG definition is greater than 80% of the total forested area in that fisheries watershed, then it can be stated that the watershed is consistent with the target in the CNCO. Areas that are below 80% are red-flagged as needing further evaluation to determine their true ECA. Table 5 shows that of the 3 Important Fisheries Watersheds within the North Coast TSA, there is only one identified as requiring further analysis about the state of hydrologically effective green-up. Watershed Assessment Guidebook,

59 Table 5: Important Fisheries Watershedoutcomes for coarse-filter hydrological green-up outcomes Target: Greater than 80% of forested area is hydrologically greened-up. Important Fisheries Watershed** Total ed Area 2006 SHEG* area 2006 % at SHEG* 2006 Redflag 20 SHEG* area 20 % at SHEG* 20 Redflag % % % % % % 5 00% 00% % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % * SHEG = Surrogate Hydrologically Effective Greenup ** See Key Map (next page) for names and locations of watersheds

60 60

61 3.2.2 Upland Streams The CNCO describes in the objective for upland streams a target for functioning upland forest within a watershed. The data set that has been prepared for this project can also be used to determine consistency with this target. Functioning upland forest includes forest that is on slopes >5% that is in a state of hydrological green-up. For the purposes of this report, we use a conservative, coarse filter approach for the definition of hydrological green-up, and assume it is achieved for forests that are in the old, mature, and mid-seral age classes (i.e. forests that are > 40 years old). Watersheds are delineated using the :,000 watershed atlas 2. The Atlas database includes over 870 residual watersheds with areas of les than ha: these are likely a result of poor polygon unioning, and therefore are not report on in this report. Tables 6a 6m show the results for upland streams for watersheds within specific watershed groups. Of the 700 watersheds reported on in these tables, only 8 pass are indicated as requiring further analysis regarding hydrologically effective green-up of the upland forest area. Table 6a: Amount of Functioning Riparian KEEC watershed group Target: At least 70% of Upland is hydrologically greened-up Key Total Upland 2006 SHEG* 2006 % Map ID ed (UF) area in UF of UF at 2006 UF # Area Area SHEG* Redflag 20 UF SHEG* area 20 % of UF at SHEG* Watershed** KEEC Group KEECWSD % % KEECWSD % % KEECWSD % % KEECWSD % % KEECWSD % % KEECWSD % % KEECWSD % 33 00% KEECWSD % % KEECWSD % % KEECWSD % % KEECWSD % % KEECWSD % % KEECWSD % % KEECWSD % % KEECWSD % % KEECWSD % % KEECWSD % % KEECWSD % % KEECWSD % % KEECWSD % % KEECWSD %.8 00% KEECWSD % % KEECWSD % % KEECWSD % % KEECWSD % % KEECWSD % % KEECWSD % % KEECWSD % % 20 UF Redflag 2 Choice of :,000 watershed atlas for watershed definition is based on direction provided at a February, 2008 videoconference with Regional and District MoFR staff 6

62 Key Map ID # Total ed Area Upland (UF) Area 2006 SHEG* area in UF 2006 % of UF at SHEG* 2006 UF Redflag 20 UF SHEG* area 20 % of UF at SHEG* Watershed** KEEC Group KEECWSD % % KEECWSD % % KEECWSD % % KEECWSD % % KEECWSD % % KEECWSD % % KEECWSD % % KEECWSD % % KEECWSD % 42 00% KEECWSD % % KEECWSD % 00% KEECWSD % % KEECWSD % % KEECWSD % % KEECWSD % % KEECWSD % % KEECWSD % % KEECWSD % % KEECWSD % % KEECWSD % % KEECWSD % % KEECWSD % % KEECWSD % % KEECWSD % % KEECWSD % % KEECWSD % % KEECWSD % % KEECWSD % % KEECWSD % % KEECWSD % % KEECWSD % 6. 00% KEECWSD % % KEECWSD % % * SHEG = Surrogate Hydrologically Effective Greenup ** From :,000 Watershed Atlas 20 UF Redflag 62

63 Table 6b: Amount of Functioning Riparian KHTZ watershed group Target: At least 70% of Upland is hydrologically greened-up Key Total Upland 2006 SHEG* 2006 % Map ID ed (UF) area in UF of UF at 2006 UF # Area Area SHEG* Redflag 20 UF SHEG* area 20 % of UF at SHEG* 20 UF Redflag Watershed** KHTZ Group KHTZWSD % % KHTZWSD % % KHTZWSD % % KHTZWSD % % KHTZWSD % % KHTZWSD % % KHTZWSD % % KHTZWSD % 49.2 % KHTZWSD % % KHTZWSD % % KHTZWSD %.0 9% KHTZWSD % 79 75% KHTZWSD % % KHTZWSD % % KHTZWSD % % KHTZWSD % % KHTZWSD % % KHTZWSD %.6 99% KHTZWSD % % * SHEG = Surrogate Hydrologically Effective Greenup ** From :,000 Watershed Atlas Table 6c: Amount of Functioning Riparian KITR watershed group Target: At least 70% of Upland is hydrologically greened-up Key Total Upland 2006 SHEG* 2006 % Map ID ed (UF) area in UF of UF at 2006 UF # Area Area SHEG* Redflag 20 UF SHEG* area 20 % of UF at SHEG* 20 UF Redflag Watershed** KITR Group KITRWSD % % KITRWSD % % KITRWSD % % KITRWSD % % KITRWSD % % KITRWSD % % KITRWSD % % KITRWSD % 24 96% KITRWSD % % KITRWSD % % KITRWSD % % KITRWSD % % * SHEG = Surrogate Hydrologically Effective Greenup ** From :,000 Watershed Atlas 63

64 Table 6d: Amount of Functioning Riparian KSHR watershed group Target: At least 70% of Upland is hydrologically greened-up Key Total Upland 2006 SHEG* 2006 % Map ID ed (UF) area in UF of UF at 2006 UF # Area Area SHEG* Redflag 20 UF SHEG* area 20 % of UF at SHEG* Watershed** KSHR Group KSHRWSD % % KSHRWSD % % KSHRWSD % % KSHRWSD % % KSHRWSD % % KSHRWSD % % KSHRWSD % % KSHRWSD % % KSHRWSD % % KSHRWSD % % KSHRWSD % % KSHRWSD % % KSHRWSD % % KSHRWSD % % KSHRWSD % % KSHRWSD % % KSHRWSD % % KSHRWSD %.2 99% KSHRWSD % 54 00% KSHRWSD % % KSHRWSD % % KSHRWSD % % KSHRWSD % % KSHRWSD % % KSHRWSD % % KSHRWSD % % KSHRWSD % % KSHRWSD % % KSHRWSD % % KSHRWSD % % KSHRWSD % % KSHRWSD %.0 96% KSHRWSD % % KSHRWSD % % KSHRWSD % % KSHRWSD %.0 00% KSHRWSD % % KSHRWSD % % KSHRWSD % % KSHRWSD % % KSHRWSD % 00% KSHRWSD % % KSHRWSD % % KSHRWSD % % KSHRWSD % % KSHRWSD % % KSHRWSD % % KSHRWSD % % KSHRWSD % % KSHRWSD % % KSHRWSD % % KSHRWSD % % KSHRWSD % % KSHRWSD %.6 00% KSHRWSD % % KSHRWSD % 3. 98% KSHRWSD % % 20 UF Redflag 64

65 Key Map ID # Total ed Area Upland (UF) Area 2006 SHEG* area in UF 2006 % of UF at SHEG* 2006 UF Redflag 20 UF SHEG* area 20 % of UF at SHEG* Watershed** KSHR Group KSHRWSD % % KSHRWSD % % KSHRWSD % % KSHRWSD % % KSHRWSD % % KSHRWSD % % KSHRWSD % % KSHRWSD % % KSHRWSD % % KSHRWSD % % KSHRWSD % % KSHRWSD % % KSHRWSD % % KSHRWSD % % KSHRWSD % % KSHRWSD % % * SHEG = Surrogate Hydrologically Effective Greenup ** From :,000 Watershed Atlas 20 UF Redflag Table 6e: Amount of Functioning Riparian KTSU watershed group Target: At least 70% of Upland is hydrologically greened-up Key Total Upland 2006 SHEG* 2006 % Map ID ed (UF) area in UF of UF at 2006 UF # Area Area SHEG* Redflag 20 UF SHEG* area 20 % of UF at SHEG* Watershed** KTSU Group KTSUWSD % % KTSUWSD % % KTSUWSD % % KTSUWSD % % KTSUWSD % % KTSUWSD % % KTSUWSD % % KTSUWSD % % KTSUWSD % % KTSUWSD %.5 00% KTSUWSD % % KTSUWSD % % KTSUWSD % % KTSUWSD % % KTSUWSD % % KTSUWSD % 00% KTSUWSD % % KTSUWSD % % KTSUWSD % % KTSUWSD % % KTSUWSD % % KTSUWSD % % KTSUWSD % % KTSUWSD % % KTSUWSD % % KTSUWSD % % KTSUWSD % % KTSUWSD % % KTSUWSD % % KTSUWSD % % 20 UF Redflag 65

66 Key Map ID # Total ed Area Upland (UF) Area 2006 SHEG* area in UF 2006 % of UF at SHEG* 2006 UF Redflag 20 UF SHEG* area 20 % of UF at SHEG* Watershed** KTSU Group KTSUWSD % % KTSUWSD % % KTSUWSD % % KTSUWSD % % KTSUWSD % % KTSUWSD % % KTSUWSD % % KTSUWSD % % KTSUWSD % % KTSUWSD % % KTSUWSD % % KTSUWSD % % KTSUWSD % % KTSUWSD % % KTSUWSD % % KTSUWSD % % KTSUWSD % % KTSUWSD % % KTSUWSD % % KTSUWSD % % KTSUWSD % % KTSUWSD % % KTSUWSD % % KTSUWSD % % KTSUWSD % % KTSUWSD % % KTSUWSD % % KTSUWSD % % KTSUWSD % % KTSUWSD % % KTSUWSD % % KTSUWSD %.3 00% KTSUWSD %.5 00% KTSUWSD % % KTSUWSD % % KTSUWSD % % KTSUWSD % % KTSUWSD % % KTSUWSD % % KTSUWSD % % KTSUWSD %.3 00% * SHEG = Surrogate Hydrologically Effective Greenup ** From :,000 Watershed Atlas 20 UF Redflag 66

67 Table 6f: Amount of Functioning Riparian KUMR watershed group Target: At least 70% of Upland is hydrologically greened-up Key Total Upland 2006 SHEG* 2006 % Map ID ed (UF) area in UF of UF at 2006 UF # Area Area SHEG* Redflag 20 UF SHEG* area 20 % of UF at SHEG* Watershed** KUMR Group KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % 6 00% KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD %.0 00% KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD %.7 00% KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD %.3 99% KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD %.7 00% KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % 20 UF Redflag 67

68 Key Map ID # Total ed Area Upland (UF) Area 2006 SHEG* area in UF 2006 % of UF at SHEG* 2006 UF Redflag 20 UF SHEG* area 20 % of UF at SHEG* Watershed** KUMR Group KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % 4 00% KUMRWSD % 7. 00% KUMRWSD % 0 00% KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % 5 00% KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD %.3 00% KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % 2. 00% KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % 20 UF Redflag

69 Key Map ID # Total ed Area Upland (UF) Area 2006 SHEG* area in UF 2006 % of UF at SHEG* 2006 UF Redflag 20 UF SHEG* area 20 % of UF at SHEG* Watershed** KUMR Group KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % KUMRWSD % % * SHEG = Surrogate Hydrologically Effective Greenup ** From :,000 Watershed Atlas 20 UF Redflag Table 6g: Amount of Functioning Riparian LNAR watershed group Target: At least 70% of Upland is hydrologically greened-up Key Total Upland 2006 SHEG* 2006 % Map ID ed (UF) area in UF of UF at 2006 UF # Area Area SHEG* Redflag 20 UF SHEG* area 20 % of UF at SHEG* Watershed** LNAR Group LNARWSD % % LNARWSD % % LNARWSD % % * SHEG = Surrogate Hydrologically Effective Greenup ** From :,000 Watershed Atlas 20 UF Redflag Table 6h: Amount of Functioning Riparian LRDO watershed group Target: At least 70% of Upland is hydrologically greened-up Total Upland 2006 SHEG* 2006 % Key Map ed (UF) area in UF of UF at 2006 UF ID # Area Area SHEG* Redflag 20 UF SHEG* area 20 % of UF at SHEG* Watershed** LRDO Group LRDOWSD % % LRDOWSD % % LRDOWSD % 83 97% LRDOWSD % % LRDOWSD % % LRDOWSD % % LRDOWSD % % LRDOWSD % % LRDOWSD % % LRDOWSD % % LRDOWSD % % LRDOWSD % % LRDOWSD % % LRDOWSD % % LRDOWSD %. 90% LRDOWSD % % LRDOWSD % % LRDOWSD % % LRDOWSD % % LRDOWSD % % LRDOWSD % % LRDOWSD % 8 00% LRDOWSD % % 20 UF Redflag 69

70 Key Map ID # Total ed Area Upland (UF) Area 2006 SHEG* area in UF 2006 % of UF at SHEG* 2006 UF Redflag 20 UF SHEG* area 20 % of UF at SHEG* Watershed** LRDO Group LRDOWSD % % LRDOWSD % % LRDOWSD % % LRDOWSD % % LRDOWSD % % LRDOWSD % % LRDOWSD %.7 00% LRDOWSD % % LRDOWSD % % LRDOWSD % % LRDOWSD % % LRDOWSD % 3 00% LRDOWSD % % LRDOWSD % % LRDOWSD % % LRDOWSD % % LRDOWSD % % LRDOWSD % % LRDOWSD % % LRDOWSD % % LRDOWSD % % LRDOWSD % % LRDOWSD % % LRDOWSD % % LRDOWSD % % LRDOWSD % % LRDOWSD % 00% LRDOWSD % % LRDOWSD % % LRDOWSD % % LRDOWSD % % LRDOWSD % % LRDOWSD % % LRDOWSD % % LRDOWSD % % LRDOWSD % % LRDOWSD % % LRDOWSD % % LRDOWSD % % LRDOWSD % % LRDOWSD % % * SHEG = Surrogate Hydrologically Effective Greenup ** From :,000 Watershed Atlas 20 UF Redflag 70

71 Table 6i: Amount of Functioning Riparian LSKE watershed group Target: At least 70% of Upland is hydrologically greened-up Total Upland 2006 SHEG* 2006 % Key Map ed (UF) area in UF of UF at 2006 UF ID # Area Area SHEG* Redflag 20 UF SHEG* area 20 % of UF at SHEG* 20 UF Redflag Watershed** LSKE Group LSKEWSD % % LSKEWSD % % LSKEWSD % % LSKEWSD % % LSKEWSD % % LSKEWSD % % LSKEWSD % % LSKEWSD % % LSKEWSD % % LSKEWSD % % LSKEWSD % % LSKEWSD % % LSKEWSD % % LSKEWSD % % LSKEWSD % % LSKEWSD % % LSKEWSD % % LSKEWSD % % LSKEWSD % 8 99% LSKEWSD % % LSKEWSD % % LSKEWSD % % LSKEWSD % % LSKEWSD % % LSKEWSD % % LSKEWSD % % LSKEWSD % % LSKEWSD % % LSKEWSD % % LSKEWSD % % LSKEWSD % % LSKEWSD % % LSKEWSD % % LSKEWSD % % LSKEWSD % % LSKEWSD % % LSKEWSD % % LSKEWSD % % LSKEWSD % % LSKEWSD % % LSKEWSD % % LSKEWSD %.9 00% LSKEWSD % % LSKEWSD % % LSKEWSD % % LSKEWSD % 23 00% LSKEWSD % % LSKEWSD % % * SHEG = Surrogate Hydrologically Effective Greenup ** From :,000 Watershed Atlas 7

72 Table 6j: Amount of Functioning Riparian MBNK watershed group Target: At least 70% of Upland is hydrologically greened-up Total Upland % Key Map ed (UF) SHEG* area of UF at 2006 UF ID # Area Area in UF SHEG* Redflag 20 UF SHEG* area 20 % of UF at SHEG* Watershed** MBNK Group MBNKWSD % % MBNKWSD % % MBNKWSD % % MBNKWSD % % MBNKWSD % % MBNKWSD % 2 00% MBNKWSD % % MBNKWSD % % MBNKWSD % % MBNKWSD % % MBNKWSD % % MBNKWSD % % MBNKWSD % % MBNKWSD % % MBNKWSD % % MBNKWSD % % MBNKWSD % % MBNKWSD % % MBNKWSD % % MBNKWSD % 23 00% MBNKWSD % % MBNKWSD % % MBNKWSD % % MBNKWSD % % MBNKWSD % % MBNKWSD % % MBNKWSD % % MBNKWSD % % MBNKWSD % % MBNKWSD % % * SHEG = Surrogate Hydrologically Effective Greenup ** From :,000 Watershed Atlas 20 UF Redflag 72

73 Table 6k: Amount of Functioning Riparian NBNK watershed group Target: At least 70% of Upland is hydrologically greened-up Total Upland % Key Map ed (UF) SHEG* area of UF at 2006 UF ID # Area Area in UF SHEG* Redflag 20 UF SHEG* area 20 % of UF at SHEG* Watershed** NBNK Group NBNKWSD % % NBNKWSD % % NBNKWSD % % NBNKWSD % % NBNKWSD % % NBNKWSD % % NBNKWSD % % NBNKWSD % % NBNKWSD % % NBNKWSD % % NBNKWSD % % NBNKWSD % % NBNKWSD % % NBNKWSD % % NBNKWSD % % NBNKWSD % % NBNKWSD % % NBNKWSD % % NBNKWSD % % NBNKWSD % 47 00% NBNKWSD % % NBNKWSD % % NBNKWSD % % NBNKWSD % % NBNKWSD % % NBNKWSD % % NBNKWSD % % NBNKWSD % 8. 00% NBNKWSD % % * SHEG = Surrogate Hydrologically Effective Greenup ** From :,000 Watershed Atlas 20 UF Redflag 73

74 Table 6l: Amount of Functioning Riparian PORI watershed group Target: At least 70% of Upland is hydrologically greened-up Key Map ID # Total ed Area Upland (UF) Area 2006 SHEG* area in UF 2006 % of UF at SHEG* 2006 UF Redflag 20 UF SHEG* area 20 % of UF at SHEG* Watershed** PORI Group PORIWSD % % PORIWSD % % PORIWSD % % PORIWSD % % PORIWSD %.5 00% PORIWSD % % PORIWSD % % PORIWSD % % PORIWSD % % PORIWSD % % PORIWSD % % PORIWSD % % PORIWSD % % PORIWSD % % PORIWSD % % PORIWSD % % PORIWSD % % PORIWSD % % PORIWSD % % PORIWSD % % PORIWSD % % PORIWSD % % PORIWSD % % PORIWSD % % PORIWSD % % PORIWSD % % PORIWSD % % PORIWSD % % PORIWSD % % PORIWSD % % PORIWSD % % PORIWSD % % PORIWSD % % PORIWSD % % PORIWSD % % PORIWSD % % PORIWSD % % PORIWSD % % PORIWSD % % PORIWSD % % PORIWSD % 2. 00% PORIWSD % % PORIWSD % % PORIWSD % % PORIWSD % % PORIWSD % % PORIWSD % % PORIWSD % % PORIWSD % % PORIWSD % % PORIWSD % % PORIWSD %.0 00% * SHEG = Surrogate Hydrologically Effective Greenup ** From :,000 Watershed Atlas 20 UF Redflag 74

75 Table 6m: Amount of Functioning Riparian WORC watershed group Target: At least 70% of Upland is hydrologically greened-up Key Total Upland % Map ID ed (UF) SHEG* area of UF at 2006 UF # Area Area in UF SHEG* Redflag 20 UF SHEG* area 20 % of UF at SHEG* UF Redflag Watershed** WORC Group WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % % WORCWSD %.3 67% WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % % WORCWSD %.2 99% WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % 88% WORCWSD % %

76 Key Map ID # Total ed Area Upland (UF) Area 2006 SHEG* area in UF 2006 % of UF at SHEG* 2006 UF Redflag 20 UF SHEG* area 20 % of UF at SHEG* UF Redflag Watershed** WORC Group WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % % WORCWSD %.4 85% WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % 2. 00% WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % 4. 83% WORCWSD % 6. 00% WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % % WORCWSD %.9 98% WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % % WORCWSD %.3 00% WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % % WORCWSD % % * SHEG = Surrogate Hydrologically Effective Greenup ** From :,000 Watershed Atlas

77 77

78 78

79 79