INTERCONNECT. 1 June May 2011

Transcription

1 INTERCONNECT 1 June May 211 NVF udvalgsmøde, 7 April 211

2 Consortium Co-ordinator TRI, Edinburgh Napier University, UK Partners Mcrit, ES MKmetric, DE Tetraplan, DK TRT, IT University of Leeds, UK University of Gdansk, PL NVF udvalgsmøde, 7 April 211

3 General Objectives To reveal the extent, impact and causes of poor interconnectivity between long- and short-distance transport; To identify existing good practise and potential solutions, analyse them and establish their likely contribution to improving interconnectivity; To disseminate the findings widely and promote takeup of best practice. NVF udvalgsmøde, 7 April 211

4 At the core of INTERCONNECT: Problems Addressed Non-provision (or inadequate standard) of the infrastructure for local links Poor design, maintenance or operation of modal interchange points Inefficient procedures for interchange (e.g. delays while waiting for luggage) Inadequate provision of local transport services (e.g. no fast public transport from an airport to city centre) Local transport services exist but do not serve the needs of connecting long-distance travellers (e.g. timetables are uncoordinated, nearest bus stop requires a long walk) Inadequate provision of information Unavailability of integrated tickets (covering the local as well as the long distance parts of the journey) NVF udvalgsmøde, 7 April 211

5 Task Structure T1.1 T2.1 General Management and Quality Control T2.1 Review of Evidence T2.2 Forec. + Mod. Tools T2.3 EU + National Pol. Issues T3.1 T3.6 Potential Solutions T4.1 Review + Methodology T4.2 Problems + Good Practise T4.3 Applicability of Pot. Solutions T5.1 Concl. from Case Studies T 5.2 Test with EU Model T5.3 Final Conclusions + Recommendations. T Dissemination and Exploitation NVF udvalgsmøde, 7 April 211

6 Potential Solutions Local link infrastructure Local transport services Improvements at the interchange point Check-in and luggage transfer Ticketing and pricing Marketing, information and sales Enabling solutions NVF udvalgsmøde, 7 April 211

7 Enabling Solutions (address organisational and institutional barriers) Introduction of a single Strategic Authority Voluntary Partnerships Intermodal Agreements Relaxation of Antitrust Laws Increase Competition where little or none Exists Strengthened Independent Regulation Tendering/Franchising/Concessioning Serial Motorway Concessions en route to major ports/airports Joint Management of Car Parks and Serial Transport Services Price Regulation for Serial Rail Concessions Coordination Between Local public transport operators and Long Distance Rail Providers Coordinated Policy for Management of an Interchange s Access modes System for Fair Distribution of Ticket Revenue NVF udvalgsmøde, 7 April 211

8 Assessment of Solutions - 1 Title Cost Tech feas. Fin feas. Org feas. User accep Polit feas. At-station passenger check-in for flights X- X- In-train passenger check-in for flights - XX Full check-in at airport rail station Door-to-door luggage transport - Flight luggage check-in at rail station - XX X- X - Early issue of luggage labels X X - Post-flight luggage collection from station X NVF udvalgsmøde, 7 April 211

9 Assessment of Solutions - 2 Title D2D time D2D cost Cmft & cnv Safe Secu. Low inc. Disab. Common design and content guidelines across operators Uniform international branding and marketing Pre-trip marketing of connecting services - - En-route marketing of connecting services - - Pre-journey information about interchanges - Multi-modal journey planner with ticketing - national - - Multi-modal journey planner with ticketing - international - - Local transport ticket sales via Internet - NVF udvalgsmøde, 7 April 211

10 Edinburgh / Glasgow Airports Glasgow Airport Edinburgh Airport Prestwick Airport NVF udvalgsmøde, 7 April 211

11 Frankfurt Airport NVF udvalgsmøde, 7 April 211

12 Traintram Karlsruhe Instead of the passenger changing vehicles, a bimodal vehicle changes from classic rural railway lines to the urban tramway system NVF udvalgsmøde, 7 April 211

13 Helsingborg, Knutpunkten Sundbusserne Knutpunkt en Scandlines HH-ferries NVF udvalgsmøde, 7 April 211

14 Helsingborg, Knutpunkten Figure 1-4 Number of train passengers changing at Knutpunkten per work day HH-ferries Figure 1-5 Layout of the Knutpunkten terminal NVF udvalgsmøde, 7 April 211

15 Helsingborg, Knutpunkten Stakeholders involved The City of Helsingborg owns the land upon which the terminal is build, as the local authority it also has an interest in managing increased traffic flows and ensuring Helsingborgs role as the regional transport hub, and as thus an attractive location for business. Banverket (Trafikverket) is the authority responsible for rail traffic in Sweden; it owns the railway tracks and is responsible for the platforms. Banverket are currently working to develop the country's stations and terminals to create attractive, safe and proper functioning of the interchanges, this includes the train station at Knutpunkten. Region Skåne is responsible for regional development throughout southern Sweden, e.g. for economic growth and providing a sustainable and attractive public transport system. Skånetrafiken is running public bus transport in Skåne on behalf of Region Skåne. They also have ticket offices and ticket machines in Terminal 1, as well as information monitors in large parts of the terminal. The Port of Helsingborg AB administrates the port, and manages the portside facilities for ferry companies. Scandlines and HH Ferries currently Scandlines is tenant in Terminal 1 of the Knutpunkten and the port of Helsingborg. The passenger terminal and offices of the shipping company are located here. In the port area Scandlines utilize large areas for berthing locations, flaps, walkways and ground areas for cars waiting to board the ferries, ticket offices, etc. With the new partnership between Scandlines and HH Ferries the facilities of the latter will be incorporated into the existing Scandlines facilities. Nordic Land owns and manages much of the commercial areas of Knutpunkten, and 88% of the community parking HH-ferries facilities at the Knutpunkten. Wihlborgs Fastigheter AB owns several properties in the Knutpunkten as well as the remaining 12% of the community parking facilities. Wihlborgs Fastigheter AB also owns two thirds of the parking facility in the bus terminal. Fastighets AB Ankaret owns the office building in Terminal 3, and a number of parking spaces in the parking facility in the bus terminal. NVF udvalgsmøde, 7 April 211

16 Helsingborg, Knutpunkten Visualisation of the new platforms and exits south of Knutpunkten Location of the new joint Scandlines/HH-ferries berth at the Knutpunkten The new central axis NVF udvalgsmøde, 7 April 211

17 Next steps E-conference open from May 211 Presentations on draft conclusions and recommendations, toolkit, case studies, test beds, surveys, etc. Interactive consortium will take up and reply on questions and comments on 9 May Available with other info from project.eu/ Send e to rg@tetraplan.dk if you wish to receive an invitation / more information Final conclusions, recommendations and toolkit (online version) will be available in June 211 NVF udvalgsmøde, 7 April 211

18 INTERCONNECT 1 June May 211 NVF udvalgsmøde, 7 April 211