EUROPEANS EXPERIENCE WITH USING SHIPS AND PERCEPTIONS OF MARITIME SAFETY

Transcription

1 Special Eurobarometer 422b EUROPEANS EXPERIENCE WITH USING SHIPS AND PERCEPTIONS OF MARITIME SAFETY SUMMARY Fieldwork: October 2014 Publication: March 2015 This survey has been requested by the European Commission, Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport (DG MOVE) and co-ordinated by Directorate-General for Communication.

2 Project title Linguistic Version Catalogue Number Special Eurobarometer 422b Europeans experience with using ships and perceptions of maritime safety EN MI EN-N ISBN DOI / European Union, 2015

3 Special Eurobarometer 422b Europeans experience with using ships and perceptions of maritime safety Conducted by TNS Opinion & Social at the request of the European Commission, Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport (DG MOVE) Survey co-ordinated by the European Commission, Directorate-General Communication DG COMM Strategy, Corporate Communication Actions and Eurobarometer Unit)

4 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION... 2 EXPERIENCE WITH USING SHIP OR BOAT Frequency of travels by ship or boat Main purpose of travels by ship or boat Importance of different aspects when planning a journey by ship or boat PERCEPTIONS OF THE QUALITY OF SEA OR RIVER TRANSPORT THE MOST SERIOUS PROBLEMS AFFECTING SEA OR RIVER TRANSPORT PERCEPTIONS ABOUT THE SAFETY OF MARITIME TRANSPORT Perceptions of safety when using different ships or boats Suggestions for increasing the feeling of safety while onboard a ship CONCLUSIONS ANNEXES Technical specifications Questionnaire Tables 1

5 INTRODUCTION More than 400 million passengers per year move through European ports, making the maritime sector an important part of Europe s transport system. The safety of maritime transport has been the focus of a number of different measures adopted by the EU over the past decade or more, ranging from directives setting out uniform safety requirements for passenger ships, and regulations relating to the safety of vehicle and passenger ferries. The commission is also currently undertaking a comprehensive review of passenger ship safety legislation, and has recently updated goals and recommendations for the EU Maritime Transport Policy until The results presented in this report are from a larger survey commissioned by the Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport to investigate the opinions of Europeans about the quality of transport in their country. The results presented in this report focus on the quality of sea and river transport in the EU, and in particular: The use of maritime transport in the EU The perceptions of the quality of sea and river transport over the last five years Europeans opinions about the most serious problems affecting sea or river transport Attitudes towards and opinions about maritime safety Ways to increase feelings of safety while on board a ship Results are presented first for the EU as a whole, then for individual countries, followed by socio-demographic analysis. This survey was carried out by TNS Opinion & Social network in the 28 Member States of the European Union between the 11 th and 20 th of October Some respondents from different social and demographic groups were interviewed face-to-face at home in their mother tongue on behalf of Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport. The methodology used is that of Eurobarometer surveys as carried out by the Directorate-General for Communication ( Strategy, Corporate Communication Actions and Eurobarometer Unit) 2.. A technical note on the manner in which interviews were conducted by the Institutes within the TNS Opinion & Social network is appended as an annex to this report. Also included are the interview methods and confidence intervals The results tables are included in the annex. It should be noted that the total of the percentages in the tables of this report may exceed 100% when the respondent has the possibility of giving several answers to the question. 2

6 Note: In this report, countries are referred to by their official abbreviation. The abbreviations used in this report correspond to: ABBREVIATIONS BE Belgium LV Latvia BG Bulgaria LU Luxembourg CZ Czech Republic HU Hungary DK Denmark MT Malta DE Germany NL The Netherlands EE Estonia AT Austria EL Greece PL Poland ES Spain PT Portugal FR France RO Romania HR Croatia SI Slovenia IE Ireland SK Slovakia IT Italy FI Finland CY Republic of Cyprus*** SE Sweden LT Lithuania UK The United Kingdom EU28 EU15 NMS13 EURO AREA European Union 28 Member States BE, IT, FR, DE, LU, NL, DK, UK, IE, PT, ES, EL, AT, SE, FI* BG, CZ, EE, HR, CY, LT, LV, MT, HU, PL, RO, SI, SK** BE, FR, IT, LV, LU, DE, AT, ES, PT, IE, NL, FI, EL, EE, SI, CY, MT, SK * EU15 refers to the 15 countries forming the European Union before the enlargements of 2004, 2007 and 2013 ** The NMS13 are the 13 new Member States which joined the European Union during the 2004, 2007 and 2013 enlargements *** Cyprus as a whole is one of the 28 European Union Member States. However, the acquis communautaire has been suspended in the part of the country which is not controlled by the government of the Republic of Cyprus. For practical reasons, only the interviews carried out in the part of the country controlled by the government of the Republic of Cyprus are included in the CY category and in the EU28 average. * * * * * We wish to thank the people throughout Europe who have given their time to take part in this survey. Without their active participation, this study would not have been possible. 3

7 EXPERIENCE WITH USING SHIP OR BOAT 1.1. FREQUENCY OF TRAVELS BY SHIP OR BOAT - Almost one quarter had travelled by commercial ship or boat - Almost one quarter (24%) had travelled by commercial ship or boat, with one in five respondents (20%) who had travelled by boat once a year or less often and only 4% who had travelled more frequently than this. Most respondents had never travelled by commercial ship or boat as a passenger (74%) 4. 4 Q17 How often do you travel by commercial ship or boat as a passenger? Daily; Several times per week; Once a week; Several times per month; Several times per year; Once a year or less often; Never; DK 4

8 Respondents living in Northern areas of the EU were the most likely to have travelled by ship or boat, as were those in the southern Mediterranean area. Respondents in Malta were the most likely to have travelled by ship or boat (78%), followed by those in Sweden (77%) and Finland (74%). This is a sharp contrast with those in Romania (8%), Bulgaria and Slovakia (both 6%). 5

9 1.2. MAIN PURPOSE OF TRAVELS BY SHIP OR BOAT - Most people travelled by ship or boat for a holiday - Respondents who had travelled by ship or boat were asked for the most frequent purpose of their travel using this mode 5. Most had travelled this way for a holiday (70%), while 23% had done so for other leisure activities. Daily commuting or business trips were far less mentioned as purpose for having travelled by ship or boat (1% and 4% respectively). Base: respondents who travelled by commercial ship or boat as a passenger (N=6,700) Respondents living in Western and Southern areas of the EU were the most likely to say holidays were the most frequent reason for travelling by ship or boat. Respondents in Malta were the most likely to have travelled by ship or boat (78%), followed by those in Sweden (77%) and Finland (74%). This is a sharp contrast with those in Romania (8%), Bulgaria and Slovakia (both 6%). 5 Q18 What is the most frequent purpose of your travels by ship or boat? (READ OUT ONE ANSWER ONLY) Daily commuting; Business trips; Holidays ; Other leisure activities; Other (SPONTANEOUS); DK 6

10 1.3. IMPORTANCE OF DIFFERENT ASPECTS WHEN PLANNING A JOURNEY BY SHIP OR BOAT - Quality and price were the most important factors when planning a journey by ship or boat - Respondents who had travelled by ship or boat as passengers were asked how important a range of aspects were to them when planning their journey(s) 6. The quality or age of the ship or boat, and price (both 83%) were the most important factors when planning a journey by ship or boat, followed by the availability of destinations at the closest port (78%), while around three quarters said the available connections, amenities and timetable were important. On the other hand, the shipping line was the only element that was rated as important by fewer than half. Base: respondents who travelled by commercial ship or boat as a passenger (N=6,700) 6 Q19 How important is each of the following elements when planning a journey by ship or boat? (SHOW CARD WITH SCALE ONE ANSWER PER LINE) Price; Timetable (frequency of service); Amenities on board; Shipping line; Published safety records of the company; Availability of the destinations at the closest port; Available connections; Quality/age of ships or boats. Very important; Fairly important; Fairly not important; Not important at all; DK 7

11 2. PERCEPTIONS OF THE QUALITY OF SEA OR RIVER TRANSPORT - Almost one in five said quality of sea or river transport had remained the same over the last five years - Respondents were asked if they thought the quality of sea or river transport improved or deteriorated over the last five years 7. Almost one in five respondents said the quality of sea or river transport in their country had stayed the same over the last five years (18%), while 14% said it had improved, and just 6% said it had deteriorated. However, it is important to note that the majority (62%) were unable to answer. This reflects the fact that most respondents had never travelled by commercial ship or boat (74%), as described in chapter 1.1. Malta and Greece were the only Member States where at least half said sea or river transport had improved in the last five years (54% and 50% respectively). However, in 17 Member States at least half of all respondents said they did not know whether the quality of sea or river transport had improved or deteriorated. 7 QA8.4 In your opinion, has the quality of the following means of transport (services, connections, infrastructures, etc.) improved or deteriorated in (OUR COUNTRY) in the last 5 years? Sea or river transport 8

12 3. THE MOST SERIOUS PROBLEMS AFFECTING SEA OR RIVER TRANSPORT - Ticket prices were considered the most serious problem affecting sea or river transport - Respondents were asked what they considered the most serious problems affecting sea or river transport in their country 8. As the chart below indicates, there was relatively little variation in responses and fewer than one in five mentioned ticket prices (18%), while water pollution or reduced links were the next most frequently mentioned problems (both 15%). Respondents were most likely to be unable to say what the most serious problems were (40%). The proportion of don t know answers reflects the fact that most respondents had never travelled by commercial ship or boat (74%). Respondents in nine Member States were most likely to say that ticket prices were the most serious problem for sea or river transport in their country. Greece was the only country where at least half said this (54%), followed by 41% in Cyprus and 39% in Croatia. In another nine Member states water pollution was the most mentioned problem, particularly by those in Finland (36%), Sweden (27%) and Belgium (21%). 8 Q12 Which of Among the following, what do you think are the most serious problems affecting maritime sea or river transport in (OUR COUNTRY)? (READ OUT ROTATE - MAX 3 ANSWERS POSSIBLE) Noise pollution; Water pollution; Safety; Reduced links of sea or river transport links; Ticket prices; Lack of frequent services; Accessibility; Others (SPONTANEOUS); None (SPONTANEOUS); DK 9

13 4. PERCEPTIONS ABOUT THE SAFETY OF MARITIME TRANSPORT 4.1. PERCEPTIONS OF SAFETY WHEN USING DIFFERENT SHIPS OR BOATS - Most respondents had a good opinion of the safety of maritime vessels - All respondents were asked their opinion about the safety of a range of maritime vessels 9. Respondents were most likely to rate cruise ships and ferries as safe (both 68%), followed by a ship used for daily commuting (63%) and small ships for sightseeing (57%). Commercial sailing ships were rated as safe by only 48%. Small ships for sightseeing and commercial sailing ships were the most likely to be rated as unsafe (20% and 19% respectively). 9 Q20 In your opinion, how safe or not are the following ships or boats?a cruise ship; A ship used for daily commuting; A ferry carrying both vehicles and passengers; A small ship for sightseeing/excursions; A (commercial) sailing ship. Very safe; Fairly safe; Not very safe; Not at all safe; DK 10

14 4.2. SUGGESTIONS FOR INCREASING THE FEELING OF SAFETY WHILE ONBOARD A SHIP - Crew competence, life-saving appliances and ship quality or age are the keys to increasing feelings of safety while on board - Respondents were asked to nominate up to two factors that would increase their confidence in the safety of a shipping line while on board 10. One third said the competence of the captain and crew (33%), while the same proportion said the availability of life-saving appliances would increase their confidence in the shipping line s safety. Almost as many (29%) mentioned the quality or age of the ship or boat. Information about safety and emergency drills were less likely to increase confidence, as was information on ship tracking or facilities for people with restricted mobility (8% and 6% respectively). 10 Q21 What would increase your confidence in the safety of a ship or company while being aboard a ship? (READ OUT MAX 2 ANSWERS) Competence of the captain and the crew; Quality/ age of the ship; Information to passengers prior departure on safety measures; Organisation of an emergency exercise; Information session on emergencies; Facilities for people with restricted mobility; Availability of life-saving appliances; Information on ship tracking; Other (SPONTANEOUS); None (SPONTANEOUS); DK 11

15 CONCLUSIONS Europeans were generally positive about the quality of sea and river transport, even though relatively few have travelled by ship or boat. Amongst those who had made a maritime journey, holiday and leisure were the most common reasons, although a small proportion did travel for business. Maritime travels are generally infrequent, with most of those who travel in this way doing so once a year or less. Overall, the quality and age of the ship or boat emerged as a key factor for quality and safety. It was (along with price) the most important factor when planning a maritime journey, and also a key factor in increasing respondent s confidence about a shipping line while on board. The quality and age of the ship or boat was also more influential than published safety records, safety drills and safety information. Respondents were asked what they considered the most serious problems affecting sea or river transport in their country and the main problem identified was ticket prices. Furthermore, when planning a trip by ship price was one of the most important factors considered. In fact price, along with the quality or age of the ship were more important that the shipping line or published safety records. These results may be because respondents generally have a good image about the safety of sea and river transport, even though most have not ever undertaken this type of travel. Respondents who thought the quality of sea and river transport had improved were more likely to be positive about sea and river transport safety, although interestingly it was infrequent travellers who were the most likely to say sea and river travels are safe more so than those who regularly travel by ship or boat. The results from this study show that although most Europeans have not travelled by ship or boat, they are generally positive about the quality and safety of sea and river transport. 12

16 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS

17 SPECIAL EUROBAROMETER 422b Europeans experience with using ships and perceptions of maritime safety TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS Between the 11 th and the 20 th of October 2014, TNS opinion & social, a consortium created between TNS political & social, TNS UK and TNS opinion, carried out the wave 82.2 of the EUROBAROMETER survey, on request of the EUROPEAN COMMISSION, Directorate-General for Communication, Strategy, Corporate Communication Actions and Eurobarometer unit. The Special Eurobarometer 422b is part of the wave 82.2 and covers the population of the respective nationalities of the European Union Member States, resident in each of the Member States and aged 15 years and over. The basic sample design applied in all states is a multi-stage, random (probability) one. In each country, a number of sampling points was drawn with probability proportional to population size (for a total coverage of the country) and to population density. In order to do so, the sampling points were drawn systematically from each of the "administrative regional units", after stratification by individual unit and type of area. They thus represent the whole territory of the countries surveyed according to the EUROSTAT NUTS II (or equivalent) and according to the distribution of the resident population of the respective nationalities in terms of metropolitan, urban and rural areas. In each of the selected sampling points, a starting address was drawn, at random. Further addresses (every Nth address) were selected by standard "random route" procedures, from the initial address. In each household, the respondent was drawn, at random (following the "closest birthday rule"). All interviews were conducted face-to-face in people's homes and in the appropriate national language. As far as the data capture is concerned, CAPI (Computer Assisted Personal Interview) was used in those countries where this technique was available. For each country a comparison between the sample and the universe was carried out. The Universe description was derived from Eurostat population data or from national statistics offices. For all countries surveyed, a national weighting procedure, using marginal and intercellular weighting, was carried out based on this Universe description. In all countries, gender, age, region and size of locality were introduced in the iteration procedure. For international weighting (i.e. EU averages), TNS Opinion & Social applies the official population figures as provided by EUROSTAT or national statistic offices. The total population figures for input in this post-weighting procedure are listed below. TS1

18 Readers are reminded that survey results are estimations, the accuracy of which, everything being equal, rests upon the sample size and upon the observed percentage. With samples of about 1,000 interviews, the real percentages vary within the following confidence limits: Statistical Margins due to the sampling process (at the 95% level of confidence) various sample sizes are in rows various observed results are in columns 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% 95% 90% 85% 80% 75% 70% 65% 60% 55% 50% N=50 6,0 8,3 9,9 11,1 12,0 12,7 13,2 13,6 13,8 13,9 N=50 N=500 1,9 2,6 3,1 3,5 3,8 4,0 4,2 4,3 4,4 4,4 N=500 N=1000 1,4 1,9 2,2 2,5 2,7 2,8 3,0 3,0 3,1 3,1 N=1000 N=1500 1,1 1,5 1,8 2,0 2,2 2,3 2,4 2,5 2,5 2,5 N=1500 N=2000 1,0 1,3 1,6 1,8 1,9 2,0 2,1 2,1 2,2 2,2 N=2000 N=3000 0,8 1,1 1,3 1,4 1,5 1,6 1,7 1,8 1,8 1,8 N=3000 N=4000 0,7 0,9 1,1 1,2 1,3 1,4 1,5 1,5 1,5 1,5 N=4000 N=5000 0,6 0,8 1,0 1,1 1,2 1,3 1,3 1,4 1,4 1,4 N=5000 N=6000 0,6 0,8 0,9 1,0 1,1 1,2 1,2 1,2 1,3 1,3 N=6000 N=7000 0,5 0,7 0,8 0,9 1,0 1,1 1,1 1,1 1,2 1,2 N=7000 N=7500 0,5 0,7 0,8 0,9 1,0 1,0 1,1 1,1 1,1 1,1 N=7500 N=8000 0,5 0,7 0,8 0,9 0,9 1,0 1,0 1,1 1,1 1,1 N=8000 N=9000 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,9 0,9 1,0 1,0 1,0 1,0 N=9000 N= ,4 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,8 0,9 0,9 1,0 1,0 1,0 N=10000 N= ,4 0,6 0,7 0,7 0,8 0,9 0,9 0,9 0,9 0,9 N=11000 N= ,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,8 0,9 0,9 0,9 0,9 N=12000 N= ,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,7 0,8 0,8 0,8 0,9 0,9 N=13000 N= ,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,7 0,8 0,8 0,8 0,8 0,8 N=14000 N= ,3 0,5 0,6 0,6 0,7 0,7 0,8 0,8 0,8 0,8 N= % 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% 95% 90% 85% 80% 75% 70% 65% 60% 55% 50% TS2

19 TS3