Lake Apopka Trail Loop Design Guidelines

Similar documents
Appendix 3. Greenway Design Standards. The Whitemarsh Township Greenway Plan

The Baker/Carver Regional Trail is intended to

Understanding user expectations And planning for long term sustainability 1

DATE: 23 March, 2011 TO: Communities FROM: BlazeSports America. RE: Accessible Trails Checklist 1

MORGAN CREEK GREENWAY Final Report APPENDICES

CHAPTER III: TRAIL DESIGN STANDARDS, SPECIFICATIONS & PERMITS

Port Gamble Shoreline Area Conceptual Trail Proposal

Attachment No. 20 RRLRT No. 1. Committee. Busway Grade Crossings STATUS/DATE OF ACTION

FEASIBILITY CRITERIA

Non-Motorized Transportation

Blueways: Rivers, lakes, or streams with public access for recreation that includes fishing, nature observation, and opportunities for boating.

METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 390 North Robert Street, St. Paul, MN Phone (651) TDD (651)

10.3 TRAIL DESIGN STANDARDS

Auburn Trail / Ontario Pathways Trail Connector Feasibility Study Public Information Meeting Wednesday, August 22, 2012

Railway-Highway Crossing at Grade Regulations: Guidelines for British Columbia s Provincial Heritage Railways

Blue River Trail Master Plan JSA to Town Hall June 2004

FINAL. Bicycle/Pedestrian Feasibility Study City of DeBary Dirksen Drive Trail. Prepared For: Volusia County MPO

K SIGNAGE & TRAFFIC CONTROL. Table of Contents

COMMUNITY MEETING NOVEMBER 1, Wheaton Regional Park Pine Lake Trail

University Region Non-Motorized Plan 2015

Provincial Railway Technical Standards

Regional Wayfinding Sign Strategy Thurston County Trails 2017

TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES MANUAL FOR WORK ZONES

Trails Classification Steering Team Alberta Tourism, Parks and Recreation Alberta Sustainable Resource Development Alberta TrailNet Society

AGENDA ITEM 5 D WAKULLA ENVIRONMENTAL INSTITUTE (WEI) TRAIL FEASIBILITY STUDY

Snowmobile Trail Signing REF: DNR Trail Signing Handbook

Jefferson County Non-Motorized Transportation and Recreational Trails Plan 2010

Tallahassee-St. Marks Historic Railroad Trail

City of Durango 5.8 FUNDING TRAILS DEVELOPMENT

APPENDIX D: SUSTAINABLE TRAIL DESIGN. APPENDICES Town of Chili Parks and Recreation Master Plan Update

Becker County Trail Routing Feasibility Study

The following criteria shall be applied within the boundaries of the AO District:

Georgetown-Lewes Rail/Trail Study. Rail/Trail Study: Cool Spring to Cape Henlopen State Park New Road Extension (House Resolution No.

West Orange Trail. Clean, Green, Fun!

Procedure for the Use of Power-Driven Mobility Devices on Mass Audubon Sanctuaries 1 September 17, 2012

4. Safety Concerns Potential Short and Medium-Term Improvements

Chapter 6: POLICY AND PROCEDURE RECOMMENDATIONS

esigning Camp and Picnic Units

2. Goals and Policies. The following are the adopted Parks and Trails Goals for Stillwater Township:

Non-motorized Trail Plan & Proposal. August 8, 2014

Group similar facilities together separate dissimilar facilities.

FINCH HYDRO CORRIDOR TRAIL PROJECT

River Parks Trail: Tulsa, Oklahoma

National Recreation Trail Update Form

3. COLTA / HUGA CONNECTIONS - PRELIMINARY

Policies, Guidelines, and Standards for Trails in Alberta Highway Rights-of-way

Citrus Heights Creek Corridor Trail Project Trail Advisory Group Field Trip #2 September 11, :00 11:00 am Trellis Hall, Citrus Heights

National Recreation Trail Application for Designation

Railroad Safety Trail

Buena Vista Community Trails Plan

Outdoor Developed Areas

What s covered. What s not covered. Options for those not covered. ABA Coverage

INTRODUCTION. Mailing address: Burke County Community Development Attn: Tim Johnson P. O. Box 219 Morganton, NC

Design Considerations For Accessible Parks & Trails

Mid Valley Trails Committee. Of Eagle County. Mid Valley Trails Plan

No 30 x 48 space is provided for a wheelchair under the picnic table.

Waukee Trailhead Public Art and Amenities Project

Longmont to Boulder Regional Trail Jay Road Connection DRAFT FINAL REPORT

Hudson Highlands Fjord Trail Draft Master Plan. April 29, 2015

ROAD AND TRAIL PROJECT APPROVAL

Mt. Hood National Forest

Section 3-04 Cross Sectional Elements TABLE OF CONTENTS. INTRODUCTION...3 General...3 Exhibit 1-Cross-Sectional Elements...3

If we make accessibility an up-front consideration that guides our planning & design efforts.

Little River Trail Feasibility Study

Welcome to the Cross County Trail Public Input Session!

HIGHWAY RAIL GRADE CROSSING CONSOLIDATION PROGRAM

CHAPTER 4 -- THE LAND USE PLAN: DESCRIPTIONS AND POLICIES FOR THIRTEEN PLANNING AREAS

Calgary River Access Strategy Priority Sites and Proposed Funding

chapter - Hex Highway Touring Route Hamburg to Strausstown Overview

MPRB: Southwest LRT Community Advisory Committee Issues and Outcomes by Location Current to: 12 November 2010

A CASE FOR COMPLETING THE JORDAN RIVER PARKWAY: A

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FALL Introduction. Findings

Logo Department Name Agency Organization Organization Address Information 5700 North Sabino Canyon Road

TRAILS INTERSECTION SIGNS

Trail Phasing Plan. Note: Trails in the Clear Creek Canyon area (Segments will be finalized in the future to minimize wildlife impacts

Flow Stand Up Paddle Board Parkway Plan Analysis

General Design Guidelines & Schedule of Design Elements For the Haw River Trail

TOWNSHIP OF WILMOT TRAILS MASTER PLAN Appendix B: Implementation Plan

Typical Conditions Along Cross-section E1 Typical Conditions Along Cross-section F

Piestewa Peak/Dreamy Draw Trail Guide

Segment 2: La Crescent to Miller s Corner

COASTAL CONSERVANCY. Staff Recommendation September 22, 2011 BAY AREA RIDGE TRAIL: HOOD MOUNTAIN TO HIGHWAY 12

Floyd River Trail Extension

CITY OF WATERLOO ACCESSIBILITY STANDARDS. FINAL ACCESSIBILITY STANDARDS June 20, 2016

Aspen Skiing Company Policy for Use of Other Power-Driven Mobility Devices And Service Animals

Trail Feasibility Study

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMORANDUM

Traffic Calming Measures

Proposed Architectural Barriers Act Accessibility Guidelines for Outdoor Developed Areas

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed action to add trails and trailheads to the Red Rock District trail system.

POLICY DCS-04: Tourism Directional Sign Policy. Development and Cultural Services

WELCOME to the Iditarod Dog Sledding Historic District (IDSHD) Workshop. January 11, Houston Middle School Houston, Alaska

DRAFT - APRIL 13, 2007 ROUTING STUDY FOR TRAIL CONNECTIONS BETWEEN CALAIS AND AYERS JUNCTION

Index. Index.1 M I N N E S O T A D E P A R T M E N T O F N A T U R A L R E S O U R C E S

DRAFT FINAL ACCESSIBILITY GUIDELINES FOR OUTDOOR DEVELOPED AREAS

LAKE APOPKA NORTH SHORE ECO TOURISM. Strategic Action Plan 4/10/2014

PURPOSE AND NEED (CONCURRENCE POINT 1) NEW CANADA ROAD PROJECT FROM STATE ROUTE 1 (U.S. HIGHWAY 70) TO U.S. INTERSTATE 40

Great Pond Mountain Conservation Trust Request for Bids Wildlands Hillside Trail Relocation and Restoration Project

Level Crossings Configuration Standards

Guide for Permits Development adjacent to Provincial Highways

Transcription:

November 2002

Prepared for 14908 Tilden Road Winter Garden, FL 34787 Prepared by 140 North Orlando Avenue Suite 295 Winter Park, FL 32789 November, 2002

I. INTRODUCTION...1 II. DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR TRAILS...3 A. High Volume Multi-Use Trails...4 1. Clear Trail Width...4 2. Clear Zones...4 3. Vertical Clearance...5 4. Trail Surface...5 5. Drainage...5 6. Alignment...5 7. Profile...5 8. Edge Protection...6 B. Low Volume Multi-Use Trails...6 1. Clear Trail Width...6 2. Clear Zones...6 3. Vertical Clearance...6 4. Trail Surface...6 5. Drainage...7 6. Alignment...8 7. Profile...8 8. Edge Protection...8 C. Single-Use Trails...8 1. Jogging and Walking Trails...8 2. Hiking and Walking Trails...9 3. Bicycle and In-Line Skating Trails...9 4. Mountain Bike Trails...9 5. Equestrian Trails...10 6. Canoe Trails...10 III. DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR CROSSINGS...11 A. At-Grade Crossings...11 1. Crossing Layout...11 2. Sight Lines...11 3. Striping and Signals...11 4. Roadway Crossings...12 5. Railroad Crossings...14 6. Crossings of Other Trails...14 B. Grade-Separated Crossings...15 1. Underpasses...15 2. Overpasses......15 3. Over Water Bridges...16 4. Wetland Boardwalks...16 IV. SUPPORT FACILITIES...17 A. Trailheads...17 B. Access Points...17 C. Rest Stops...17 D. Parking and Staging Areas...17 1. General Parking...17 2. Equestrian Trailer Parking...18 3. Boat and Canoe Trailer Parking...18 4. Bicycle Racks...18 E. Interpretive Facilities...18 V. TRAIL SIGNS AND MARKINGS......19 A. Directional Signs...19 B. Cautionary Signs...19 C. Regulatory Signs...19 D. Interpretive Signs...19 E. Objective Signs...20 F. Identification Signs...20 G. Sign Standards...21 VI. BIBLIOGRAPHY...21 Page i

I. INTRODUCTION The purpose of this report is to establish guidelines for the development of trails, trailheads and trail crossings, and to develop a sign package for the Lake Apopka Trail Loop as shown in the Lake Apopka Basin Master Plan; Greenways, Trails, Recreation, Ecotourism. The Lake Apopka Basin Master Plan was prepared to create a linked framework of recreation opportunities around Lake Apopka. The trail system, in conjunction with key recreation and tourism sites around Lake Apopka, will connect to the statewide system of greenways and trails and will attract local residents, people from throughout Florida, and visitors from around the world to Lake Apopka and the surrounding communities. Segment A - Magnolia Park to Ocoee Property Segment B - Ocoee to Winter Garden Segment C - Winter Garden to Oakland Nature Preserve Segment D - Oakland Nature Preserve to Montverde Segment E - Montverde to Lake County Preserve Segment F - Lake County Preserve to Clay Island Segment G - Clay Island to Shorebird Management Area/ Nature Center Segment H - Shorebird Management Area/ Nature Center to Magnolia Park Segment I - Lake Apopka Loop to Lake Minneola Urban Waterfront Park and Scenic Minneola Trail/ South Lake Trail The Lake Apopka Basin Master Plan shows a loop around Lake Apopka consisting of nine Ecotourism sites and nine trail segments (see Map 1). The loop will be an extension of the West Orange Trail (19 miles) and will eventually connect to the Lake Minneola Scenic trail (21 miles when complete), the Mt. Dora Trail, and the General James A. Van Fleet Trail (29 miles), increasing the accessibility to the Lake Apopka area and furthering the purpose of the Statewide Greenways and Trails Plan. The proposed trailhead ecotourism sites are shown as 1 through 9, and the segments are shown as A through I. The following nine trail segments shown in Map 1 on the following page, will connect the proposed recreation/ecotourism sites: Page 1

The include standards for trails, crossings, support facilities and signage standards. Interpretive messages and key sites can raise a visitor's awareness of Lake Apopka as an important natural resource, educate the public on the importance of protecting our water resources, restore the lake and preserve natural Florida for future generations. The following agencies and municipalities within the basin were involved throughout the preparation of this document: East Central Florida Regional Planning Council St. Johns River Water Management District Orange County Lake County Town of Oakland City of Ocoee City of Winter Garden City of Apopka Town of Montverde City of Clermont Orange Audubon Society Florida Office of Greenways and Trails Green Mountain Scenic Byway Committee Trail Friends, Inc. Lake Apopka Greenways and Trails Master Plan Proposed Lake Apopka Loop Lake Minneola Trail West Orange Trail Existing Proposed Proposed Trail Heads Trail Connections Watershed Boundary Lakes Municipalities Map 1 Page 2

II. DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR TRAILS The Lake Apopka Trail Loop goes through urban areas as well as rural environmentally sensitive areas. Therefore, it is important to consider the various types of trails that will comprise the loop. Some areas within the Lake Apopka Basin may be adequate for high-impact uses such as biking and in-line skating, while others may be more adequate for low-impact uses such as hiking and horseback riding. This document establishes guidelines for each type of trail. The guidelines are intended to serve as a resource when designing the specific trails that will comprise the Lake Apopka Loop. They are consistent with the current Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) and Office of Greenways and Trails (OGT) standards for bicycle facilities. In the event that the FDOT and/or the OGT standards are amended or if any section of this report is found to be in conflict with the State standards, the most restrictive standards shall apply. The following are the design elements to be considered for each trail type. The resources used to prepare this manual are listed in Section VI. Bibliography. Clear Trail Width Refers to the width of the traveled part of the trail that is free of protruding objects and obstacles, such as trees and overgrown vegetation. Clear Zones Refer to the area on each side of the trail between the traveled surface and any obstructions, such as trees, walls or fences. Vertical Clearance Refers to the height above the trail that is free from protruding objects and overhead obstructions, such as tree branches or bridges. Clear Zone Clear Trail Width Clear Zone Trail Surface Refers to the type of surface on the traveled part of the trail, such as asphalt, concrete, granular, or alternative. Surface quality is affected by tread obstacles, such as roots or rocks, and by any openings such as gaps and grates located within the trail surface. Drainage Refers to techniques used to move and keep water off of the trail and trail embankment. Page 3

Alignment Refers to the horizontal curvature of the trail. Profile Refers to the vertical curvature of the trail. Trail Alignment Trail Profile Edge Protection Refers to any protective barrier designed to separate the trail from its surrounding environment, such as a fence or curb. A. High Volume Multi-Use Trails High volume multi-use trails typically connect residential areas, schools, activity centers, parks, recreational areas, along with cultural and historical points of interest. Multiuse trails in some cases are utilized as transportation alternatives to motorized use for local commuters, as well as for leisure and tourism purposes. All user types can normally be accommodated on high volume multi-use trails, following the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) guidelines for accessibility purposes. As noted in the Lake Apopka Basin Master Plan, a portion of the Lake Apopka Loop (a portion of Segments A, all B, C and part of D) will utilize the existing West Orange Trail, which is a high volume multi-use trail. The segment connecting the West Orange Trail to the Lake Minneola Scenic Trail (Segment I) and the portion that extends from the South Lake Trail north to the St. Johns River Water Management District area (Segments D, E, F) are proposed as a high volume multi-use trail. The standards for high volume multi-use trails are as follows: 1. Clear Trail Width The recommended width for a high-volume multiuse trail is 12 feet (it may be increased to 14-16 feet depending on trail traffic). The West Orange Trail is a 14-foot wide paved trail. Multi-use trails should include widened areas at regular intervals to allow users to pass one another. 2. Clear Zones High volume multi-use trails should maintain a minimum 2-foot graded area on each side of the trail, graded at a maximum slope of 6:1 (see Figure 1). High volume multi-use trails should maintain a minimum 1-foot buffer zone between the edge of the graded clear zone and any fixed objects such as signs or trees. On bridges, this guideline does not apply. Page 4

In natural areas, underbrush should be trimmed so that it does not hang over the trail edge or obstruct the pathway. Figure 1 10 2 12-16 2 Clear Zone Clear Trail Width 3 Clear Zone Trail Surface: asphalt, concrete, granular 3. Vertical Clearance Multi-use trails should maintain a 10-foot minimum clearance. 4. Trail Surface Asphalt or concrete are the preferred surfaces for multi-use trails. The surface should be smooth and free of tread obstacles. In wet areas a boardwalk is recommended (see "Boardwalks" section III.B.4). 5. Drainage It is important that high-volume multi-use trails be well drained. Standing water on a trail will adversely affect the trail surface and diminish the life and quality of the trail. Disturbed areas should be seeded and mulched or sodded to prevent erosion. Multi-use trails should be cross-sloped or crowned at approximately 2 percent. If a trail is benched into a slope, a swale on the uphill side should be considered to catch water before it crosses the trail. In some areas culverts may be necessary to move water under the trail. 6. Alignment The trail turns need to have a typical curve radius of approximately 100 feet. The AASHTO Guidelines state that cross slopes shall not exceed 2-3 percent and the maximum elevation rate will be 3 percent. When transitioning a 3 percent elevation, a minimum 25 foot transition distance should be provided between the end and beginning of consecutive and reversing horizontal curves. 7. Profile It is recommended that no more than one-third of the total trail length for a multi-use trail exceed 8.3 percent. In addition, the following guidelines shall Page 5

be followed: Trail grade may be 5 percent or less for any distance. Trail grade may be 8.3 percent for a maximum distance of 200 feet. Trail grade may be 10 percent for a maximum distance of 30 feet. Trail grade may be 12.5 percent for a maximum distance of 10 feet. The trail grade between the maximum grade segments should return to 5 percent for a minimum distance of 5 feet to allow resting opportunities for people who have difficulty traveling over sloped surfaces. 8. Edge Protection Edge protection is not required on a multi-use trail unless it is in an area where safety is a concern. If in an area where the land on either side of the path drops-off and safety is a concern, fencing should be installed and it should be at least 42 inches high. Edge Protection should be installed in locations where adjacent uses could cause a threat to trail user safety, such as railroad tracks or active industry. Rub-rails should be installed at ground level and at the level of an adult bicyclist's handlebars. B. Low Volume Multi-Use Trails Low volume multi-use trails have a low volume of users at any given time, fewer provided amenities than high volume multi-use trails, and are located away from populated areas. Low volume multiuse trails will be used to connect the main trail with natural and cultural resources or to direct trail users to single use trails (e.g. jogging, hiking, equestrian trails) in the area around the lake. The standards for low volume multi-use trails are as follows: 1. Clear Trail Width Low volume multi-use trails should be designed to be 5 to 8 feet wide. Low volume multi-use trails should include widened areas at regular intervals to allow users to pass one another. In urban or suburban locations, low volume multiuse trails should be set back at least five feet from any roadway curb. 2. Clear Zones In natural areas underbrush should be trimmed so it does not overhang onto the trail edge or obstruct the pathway. 3. Vertical Clearance Low volume multi-use trails should maintain an 10- foot minimum vertical clearance, see Figure 2. 4. Trail Surface Low volume multi-use trails may be surfaced with Page 6

wood chips, crushed stone, or may be made of compacted earth. The surface should be firm and stable. In wet areas a boardwalk is recommended. Any tread obstacles such as rocks or roots embedded into the trail surface should be less than 2 inches to prevent tripping. The wooden trail surface of a bridge or boardwalk may cause problems for some users, therefore, the wooden slats should be placed as close together as possible while still allowing for drainage between them. The planks of the bridge or boardwalk shall be perpendicular to the dominant direction of travel to prevent bicycle tires and wheelchair wheels from becoming stuck in the openings. Figure 2. 5. Drainage Proper drainage is important for low volume multi-use trails. Water can be removed from low volume multi-use trails through the following methods: In flat areas, the trail should be cross-sloped or crowned at approximately 2 percent (see Figures 3 and 4). On areas where the trail may need to be benched into a slope, a swale on the uphill side should be created to catch water before it crosses the trail. (Figure 5) Culverts may be necessary to move water under the trail. Disturbed areas should be seeded, mulched or sodded to prevent erosion. Figure 3.Trail Cross Slope Figure 4. Crowning of a Trail 10 Figure 5. Trail with Drainage Swale 5-8 Clear Trail Width Trail Surface: Natural, granular, wood chips Drainage Swale to Collect Uphill Runoff Page 7

6. Alignment Alignment is not a design issue for most low-volume multi-use trails. 7. Profile No more than one-third of the total trail length of a low volume multi-use trail should exceed 8.3 percent. The following guidelines should be followed: The grade of the trail may be 5 percent or less for any distance. For a maximum distance of 200 feet, the trail grade may be 8.3 percent. For a maximum distance of 30 feet, the trail grade may be 10 percent. For a maximum distance of 10 feet, the trail grade may be 12.5 percent. In order to provide resting opportunities for people who have difficulty traveling over sloped surfaces, the trail grade between the maximum grade segments should return to 5 percent for a minimum distance of 5 feet. 8. Edge Protection Edge protection is not needed on low volume multiuse trails, but if provided, edge protection should be at least 4 inches. C. Single Use Trails Single-use trails help to keep one activity or two similar activities on one pathway. Single-use trails will act as spurs from the main Apopka Loop Multi-Use Trail. These spurs will connect the main trail to the lake, schools, public uses, parks, etc. The following are examples of various types of single-use trails that may be developed in conjunction with the main Lake Apopka Trail Loop. 1. Jogging and Walking Trails Jogging and walking trails are typically accommodated with other trail users such as bicyclists and in-line skaters within a multi-use corridor. Since these multiuse trails have pedestrians, the facilities should be accessible to a variety of people with a broad range of abilities, skill levels, and desired experiences, and should be designed to accommodate all user-types. The recommended minimum width for jogging and walking trails is 5 feet. In urban and suburban areas, jogging and walking trails should be set back at least 5 feet from any roadway curb. Because of the relatively slow speed of pedestrians, clear zones are not necessary for strictly pedestrian trails. Page 8

2. Hiking and Walking Trails Hiking and walking trails are used exclusively by pedestrians and are typically found in natural areas. They are low-impact trails that allow pedestrians access around the natural environment. Hiking and walking trails are used by a variety of people with a broad range of abilities, skill levels and desired experiences and should be designed to accommodate all individuals. Because of the relatively slow speed of pedestrians, clear zones are not necessary for strictly pedestrian trails. 3. Bicycle and In-Line Skating Trails Bicycles and in-line skating rarely ever enjoy exclusive use of a paved trail facility. In most cases, bicycle trails accommodate pedestrians and in-line skaters on a single paved treadway. Therefore, the multi-use trail standards apply to bicycle and in-line skating trails. 4. Mountain Bike Trails Mountain bike trails are typically rugged, off-road trails and would be most appropriate for the Lake County side of the loop. The guidelines are less stringent than other trails, but they can only accommodate one type of bicycle, a mountain bike. A single track mountain bike trail is a narrow pathway with many hills and sharp turns that vary in difficulty, see Figure 6. The intended difficulty of the mountain bike trail determines the alignment of the trail. A trail becomes more challenging based on the tightness of the turns. 8 Natural Trail Surface 2 4 Clear Zone Clear Trail Width 2 Clear Zone Figure 6. Page 9

5. Equestrian Trails Trails to accommodate horses have a great deal of flexibility in design. Surface is the most important consideration for equestrian trails in order to reduce injuries to animals and riders. Equestrian trails should not require the rider to dismount in order to avoid obstacles while on the trail. Bikes are not allowed on the equestrian trails. Figure 7 shows the standards. 6. Canoe Trails Canoe routes should be designed to offer the safe and reliable passage of a canoe or kayak. Routes may offer trips of varying lengths, from day trips to multi-day overnight excursions. The primary considerations in the designation of canoe routes include adequate signage and support facilities, and the reasonable expectation that the waterway can accommodate small watercraft most of the time. Access points or landings should be situated at maximum intervals of 5 miles. Signage should be included to direct users to the lake and to inform users on the lake. Uniform directional signage should be placed on nearby roadways and around the lake to advertise landing locations, camping facilities, etc. 10 Figure 7. 4 Tread Width 8 Cleared Trail Width Page 10

III. DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR CROSSINGS The design of trail crossings shall be consistent with the FDOT standards. This section provides an overview of the most common crossings that can be found in the system. A. At-Grade Crossings At-grade crossings should be created in places where the traffic volumes are low, at an existing traffic signal or when conditions hinder the ability to implement a grade-separated crossing. 1. Crossing Layout Trails should cross roadways and railroads at right angles whenever possible. Should a trail approach a road or railway at a skew, the trail should be routed to achieve a right-angle crossing wherever possible. 2. Sight Lines Motorists and trail users need to be able to see each other at roadway crossings. A motorist needs to be able to stop in time if a trail user is in the road, and a trail user needs to be able to judge his or her ability to cross the street safely. The AASHTO Guide has detailed information on determining and planning sight distances at roadway crossings. Figure 8. Additional Right-of-Way may be required Right-Angle Roadway Crossing 3. Striping and Signals Striping and signals help to announce the crossing to trail users as well as motorists and should be used in varying degrees depending on the functional classification of the trail and the traffic volume of the roadway to be crossed. Striping are the markings painted on the pavement of a trail or roadway. Marked crosswalks and "BIKE XING" lettering are striping. Signals are regulator traffic lights, flashing yellow warning lights, stop lights, and pedestrian crossing signals. Page 11

4. Roadway Crossings All roadway crossings should include clear sightlines, flush transitions between the trail and the roadway, and a 3-foot strip of detectable warnings (i.e. truncated domes) as defined in the Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines (ADAAG). Arterial Roads Arterial roads are the largest type of road other than restricted access highways, see Figure 9. Arterial roads typically have a very high traffic volume traveling at high speeds. There usually is more than one lane traveling in each direction. Crossings of arterial roads require: Crossings at signals only Figure 9. Traffic Signal Stop Bar Marked crosswalks Cautionary and regulatory signage on trail Collector Roads Moderate sized streets that serve as secondary connections within communities or as primary routes in rural areas are considered collector roads. Collector roadways may have high traffic speed but usually have lower volume than arterial roads. There usually is one lane in each direction. Crossings of collector roads require (see Figure 10): Crossings at signals, at controlled intersections, or flashing lights at mid-block. Marked crosswalks Cautionary and regulatory signage on trail Cautionary signage on roadway Figure 10. Refuge Area Striped Cross Walk Striped Cross Walk Page 12

Residential Streets Roadways with low traffic volume and speed found within communities to serve local residents are residential streets. Crossings of residential streets require (see Figure 11): Cautionary and regulatory signage on trail. Cautionary signage on roadway. Marked crosswalks if trail or roadway traffic volume is high or if safety concerns exist. Figure 12. Apron Striped Cross Walk Figure 11. Striped Cross Walk Rural Roadways Rural roadways are usually connections to and from agricultural areas. They may have either a paved or a granular surface. They have a low traffic volume but travel at high speeds. Crossings of rural roadways require: Cautionary and regulatory signage on trail Cautionary signage on roadway Marked crosswalks If trail is paved and the roadway is not, the trail should be paved across the roadway. Access Drives Access drives provide connections between residential, commercial, industrial, or institutional properties and an adjacent roadway, serving only one specific property. The traffic volumes are typically low and travel at slow speeds. Trails adjacent to roadways may cross several access drives. Crossings of access drives require (see Figure 13): Cautionary signage on trail Trail may be striped across driveway See Figure 12 for Access Drive Crossing. Figure 13. White Striping Page 13

5. Railroad Crossings Railroad crossings are very similar to roadway crossings. Trails should cross railroads at right angles. For paved trails, railroad tracks are typically set into the surface material. In this situation, the railroad crossing should include a rubberized crossing material in order to provide a long-term smooth ride surface for trail users. For unpaved trails, a ramp should lead up to the railroad tie with a 5 by 5 foot level landing on each side of the track. A rubberized crossing material is also recommended for unpaved trails to minimize maintenance of the railroad crossing. See Figure 14 for railroad crossing examples. Figure 14. Railroad Crossing Layouts Trail widened at sharp curves Lake Apopka Trail Loop Rubberized or concrete crossing Widen trail to allow near-perpendicular crossing 6. Crossings of Other Trails Trails sometimes will cross one another, which could cause potential hazards to users. Trails therefore require proper striping, signals, signage and markings. This is especially true when trails that accommodate different uses intersect. The following are recommendations for crossings of other trails: Offset the trail intersections and create two threeway intersections rather than one four-way intersection Design the physical connection between the two trail surfaces to be level and smooth. Provide signs at the intersection that clearly indicate the desired direction of travel, the possible destinations and their distances. Clearly indicate through signs or barriers the permitted user groups on each trail. Provide objective sign information about the conditions of each trail. 90 Degree Crossing Striped Cross Walk 45 Degree Crossing Page 14

B. Grade-Separated Crossings Grade-separated crossings should be created when high traffic volumes exist on the roadway or trail because they are safer crossing methods than at-grade crossings. 1. Underpasses Building a tunnel beneath a roadway or railroad is a method of accomplishing grade-separated crossing. The following recommendations are for underpass design: The minimum width of an underpass must be the required width of the trail plus the additional clear zones. Should the underpass need to be accessible to an emergency vehicle, the width of the underpass should be a minimum of 10 feet. Wide underpasses are preferred since they offer a lighter, safer environment for trail users. An underpass should be sloped so it drains out one of the entrances. An underpass should be graded so that exterior surface water is diverted away from the underpass. Good lighting should be provided to increase user comfort and minimize crime. Users should be able to see the other side of the underpass upon entering. Fencing as Required by Roadway Lake Apopka Trail Loop 2. Overpasses Overpasses may be stand-alone trail-user bridges designed to traverse over major roadways. Overpasses can also be retrofitted shoulders and walkways of existing road bridges. Strictly trail-user bridges should be designed to be easily accessible to those versatile trailusers and users with disabilities. The following recommendations are for overpass design: The minimum width of an overpass must be the required width of the trail plus the additional clear zones. On independent trail bridges, the recommended clear zone width may be reduced. On roadway bridges, the recommended width of the trail plus the recommended clear zone are required, see Figure 16. The fencing requirements as seen in Figure 16, are fullheight fencing on the drop-off side of trail. The transition from the trail and the trail bridge should be flush. The maximum approach grade for a new bridge is 5 percent. The loading of the bridge should be designed for the heaviest vehicle that will cross the bridge, including maintenance vehicles. Figure 16. 6 Safety Fencing Required Trail Clearance Figure 15. Clear Zone Recommended Trail Width Clear Zone Page 15

3. Over Water Bridges Bridges that pass over water have similar guidelines to overpasses. Environmental impact is the main consideration for bridges that pass over water. The guidelines for width, approaches and design loading for "Overpasses" are the same for Over Water Bridges. The following guidelines provide fencing, mitigation and environmental recommendations for bridges: Set bridge abutments as low as possible to reduce the amount of fill in the floodplain. The slope of the floodplain is a good location for bridge abutments as the trail can cross the water body at a relatively level grade. Avoid setting bridge piers directly in the watercourse because this could disrupt flow and trap debris. Design the bridges with as few piers as possible. Over water bridges should have 42-inch high fencing on both sides of the trail with a side barrier at trail level to prevent wheels and runners from dropping off the edge of the bridge, see Figure 16. The transition between the trail and the bridge should be flush. be build on an elevated boardwalk for the entire length of the delineated wetland. The following are recommendations for wetland boardwalks: The wooden trail surface of the boardwalk may cause problems for some user modes and therefore, the wooden slats should be placed as close together as possible while still allowing for drainage between them. The planks of the boardwalk shall be perpendicular to the dominant direction of travel to prevent bicycle tires and wheelchair wheels from becoming stuck in the openings. Curves and angles on an elevated boardwalk should be gradual. Water levels fluctuate in wetlands and the trail surface should be located above the normal high water line of the wetland. Along both sides of the boardwalk, a 42-inch fence with a side barrier at trail level will run to prevent wheels and runners from falling off the boardwalk. Flat grade Minimize spacing between deck planks 4. Wetland Boardwalks As a rule, trails should avoid wetlands whenever possible. Occasionally for interpretive purposes or out of necessity a trail may cross a wetland. It is recommended that if a trail must cross a wetland, the trail Deck level normal flood elevation Minimize number of piers in water 42 safety fencing Minimize height to reduce grading for bridgeheads Page 16

IV. SUPPORT FACILITIES A. Trailheads Trailheads are parcels specifically designated as the primary means of accessing a trail. Trailheads may include restrooms, maps, parking, picnic facilities and other amenities. The Master Plan identifies nine trailheads. When the trailheads are developed and improved, the following standards will need to be considered: Handicap accessible pathways shall be developed to connect parking and other elements to the trailhead. Trailheads shall include at a minimum parking and a trail map sign, but may also include restrooms, drinking fountains, picnic facilities, horse tie-ups, bicycle racks, and other recreational amenities. Trailheads associated with equestrian or aquatic trails shall provide parking and turn-around space for trailers. B. Access Points Minor connections between the trail and nearby parks, communities or roadways are access points. Trails can run for long stretches surrounded by private property and access points need to be provided wherever possible to the trail. Trail access points shall be placed where trail access is expected such as from adjacent communities, schools, commercial areas and parks. Trail access points shall include signage identifying the trail and may include a map sign and water fountain. Limited parking may also be provided, but trail access points are designed to provide access from local communities and amenities to the trail and parking may be unnecessary. C. Rest Stops Generally, rest stops are small support facilities located along a trail that do not provide access to surrounding amenities. Rest stops provide an area to stop and rest off the main traveled way of the trail. They also may serve as interpretive areas or overlooks. Trail rest areas shall at a minimum include a seating area and, depending on the trail type, provide a hitching post for horses and bicycle racks for cyclists. They may additionally include drinking fountains, restroom facilities, and signage. Trail rest areas shall be located approximately every half hour of travel time. The distance between rest areas shall be dictated by the use modes on the trail. D. Parking and Staging Areas It is important to consider the average and maximum user capacity of a trail when planning parking needs. Parking lots should be sized consistent with the use demands, trail activity and user type. Minimum parking for 25 vehicles should be provided at primary trailheads and may be extended to 100 spaces. Parking lots must provide adequate space for vehicles with trailers and include the proper turning radii. Staging areas at trailheads should be located with convenient and safe access to the trail. 1. General Parking Follow jurisdiction guidelines. Page 17

2. Equestrian Trailer Parking Should be non-asphalt and designed as a row of pullthrough spaces each 45 feet deep and 15 feet wide for unloading horses and to allow horses to be tied to trailer sides. To accommodate overflow parking, additional space is recommended. When designing for equestrian parking consider accessibility to shade and potable water. 3. Boat and Canoe Trailer Parking Boat and canoe trailer parking design should be similar in size to the equestrian trailer parking. Boat and canoe parking spaces should be pull-through. A staging area should be designed with close proximity to the water edge to control access. 4. Bicycle Racks Racks should be provided at all primary trailheads. They should meet all FDOT design guidelines. Staging areas are the most suitable location for bicycle racks. E. Interpretive Facilities Trails help to provide understanding of the environment through which they pass. Trails can educate the user on various landscape features such as native plants and animals, geologic history, local and state history. Interpretive facilities should offer a view of the item to be interpreted. Some trails offer several interpretive opportunities and other trails may offer them as educational diversions incorporated into rest stops. The following guidelines offer some general suggestions regarding interpretive facilities: Signage shall be included with ample graphics provided to engage users of all ages and clearly explain the interpreted item(s). Interpretive facilities shall be placed wherever there is a significant cultural, historical or natural phenomenon. Small interpretive facilities may be implemented more frequently if user speeds are low, as on hiking and walking trails. Page 18

V. TRAIL SIGNS AND MARKINGS Safety and comfort are increased on trails through signage. Signage is an important amenity feature to a trail that should not be overlooked. Signs help to assist in the navigation of a trail or trail system, warn of approaching roadway crossings, regulate trail use, and interpret natural features. The Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) published by the Federal Highway Administration is a valuable reference for signage standards, even though the document is geared for roadway signage the standards can easily be adopted for trail use. There are five basic categories for signs: A. Directional Signs Directional signs provide street names, trail names, direction arrows, mileage of points of interest, and other navigational information. B. Cautionary Signs Cautionary signs warn of upcoming roadway crossings, steep inclines, blind curves, and other potential trail hazards. C. Regulatory Signs Regulatory signs tell the "rules of the trail" by prohibiting certain uses or controlling the direction of travel. D. Interpretive Signs Interpretive signs offer educational information on the trail environment. Title Logo/Graphic 5 Description 3 to 4 Page 19

Lake Apopka Trail Loop E. Objective Signs Objective signs provide information about the trail conditions regarding grade, cross slope, surface, clear trail width and obstacle height. Objective signage allows users to make informed decisions about which trails best meet their trail needs and abilities. Objective signs should be placed at the trailheads in order to inform the user of the trail conditions prior to using the trail. 3 to 4 F. Identification Signs Identification signs provide information about the trail type and what recreational activites are permitted on the trail. Identification signs show users what type a trail they are utilizing. Identification signs should be placed at the trailheads in order to inform the user of the trail type prior to using the trail. 2 to 3 Page 20

G. Sign Standards The following guidelines relate to the general placement and design of trail signage: Signs shall be placed where they are clearly visible. Placement shall be dependent on the sight lines (relative to user speed) of each trail. Signs shall be placed at a consistent distance from the trail edge, 3 feet 6 inches is recommended. Lettering less than two inches in height is not recommended for directional signs. Text should be avoided on regulatory or cautionary signs wherever possible. Multiple signs may be mounted on the same post with the primary message placed in the top position on the post. VI. BIBLIOGRAPHY Office of Greenways & Trails Reference and Resource Guide Federal Highway Administration Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities Florida Recreational Trails Council. Florida Greenways and Trails System for Unpaved and Paddling Trails. May 1998. Iowa Department of Transportation. Iowa Trails 2000. 2000. Wilbur Smith Associates and 2M Associates. Contra Costa County Trail Design Resource Handbook. March 2001. Page 21