AIRPORT COLLABORATIVE DECISION MAKING

Similar documents
FRA CDM. Airport Collaborative Decision Making (A-CDM) Flight Crew Briefing FRANKFURT AIRPORT. German Harmonisation

Target Off-Block Time (TOBT)

FRA CDM. Airport Collaborative Decision Making (A-CDM) BRIEF DESCRIPTION Frankfurt Airport Version 4.0. German Harmonisation

Intentionally left blank

Changi Airport A-CDM Handbook

Key Performance Indicators 2017

Key Performance Indicators 2016

A-CDM AT HONG KONG INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT (HKIA)

A-CDM from the Flight Crew Perspective. Francisco Hoyas

Key Performance Indicators 2015

REPUBLIC OF SINGAPORE AERONAUTICAL INFORMATION SERVICES CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY OF SINGAPORE SINGAPORE CHANGI AIRPORT P.O. BOX 1, SINGAPORE

Airport Collaborative Decision Making (A-CDM) Operations Guidelines Version Date: 2017/07/21

2nd forum. Airport FRA. procedure

Guide for. A-CDM in CPH

GENERAL 1. What is Airport CDM? 2. What is the aim of A-CDM? 3. Why has A-CDM been implemented at Amsterdam Airport Schiphol?

DELHI AIRPORT COLLABORATIVE DECISION MAKING (DA-CDM) INDIRA GANDHI INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT NEW DELHI

Implementation, goals and operational experiences of A-CDM system

INTRODUCTION OF AIRPORT COLLABORATIVE DECISION MAKING (A-CDM) AT SINGAPORE CHANGI AIRPORT

The Third ATS Coordination Meeting of Bay of Bengal, Arabian Sea and Indian Ocean (BOBASIO) Region Hyderabad, India, 22 nd to 24 th October 2013.

Annual Report 2017 KPI

Leveraging on ATFM and A-CDM to optimise Changi Airport operations. Gan Heng General Manager, Airport Operations Changi Airport Group

Airport Collaborative Decision Making. Dublin A-CDM Operational Procedures

CANSO view on A-CDM. Case study on A-CDM at HKIA. Change management & human factors

AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA S AIRPORT COLLABORATIVE DECISION MAKING SYSTEM. (Presented by Airports Authority of India) SUMMARY

AERONAUTICAL INFORMATION CIRCULAR 1/19

[EFFECTIVE DATE: 23 AUG 2012]

A-CDM FOR REGIONAL AIRPORTS CONCEPT VALIDATION DOCUMENTO PÚBLICO

Frankfurt Aircraft Deicing Plan Winter Season 2018/2019

Integration of the Airport and the Network DPI/FUM Messages Management Overview

Ultra s Experience with A-CDM

International Civil Aviation Organization

AIRPORT COLLABORATIVE DECISION MAKING (A-CDM): IATA RECOMMENDATIONS

Can elements of the A-CDM milestone approach be automated? Bob Graham Head of Airport Research for Alan Marsden TAM Manager

Airspace Organization and Management

Airport Collaborative Decision Making

Seen through an IATA lens A-CDM Globally

Hosted by General Civil Aviation Authority (GCAA)

International Civil Aviation Organization. Twenty-Fourth South East Asia ATM Coordination Group (SAIOACG/7) Bangkok, Thailand, March 2017

Acronyms. Definition. Explanation. All coloured Acronym rows are time parameters which have a standard length of four characters.

FAA Surface CDM. Collaborative Decision Making and Airport Operations. Date: September 25-27, 2017

COMMISSIONING OF ADDITIONAL AIRCRAFT STANDS KEMPEGOWDA INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BENGALURU (VOBL)

D02 - Phase 1 - System Requirements Specification

Lisboa RFE. Respect the ATC and the other pilots at all times and be understanding.

Basic DMAN Operational Service and Environment Definition (OSED)

IVAO Switzerland Division

Aviation ICT Forum OCT 2014

The SESAR Airport Concept

PILOT BRIEFING GENEVA RFE 2018

A-CDM Implementation: Burden or Blessing for ANSPs?

EUROPEAN ORGANISATION FOR THE SAFETY OF AIR NAVIGATION EUROCONTROL EUROCONTROL EXPERIMENTAL CENTRE. Collaborative Decision Making at LISBON Airport

GATWICK NIGHT MOVEMENT AND QUOTA ALLOCATION PROCEDURES

LFPG / Paris-Charles de Gaulle / CDG

CLEARANCE INSTRUCTION READ BACK

OPTIMAL PUSHBACK TIME WITH EXISTING UNCERTAINTIES AT BUSY AIRPORT

DMAN-SMAN-AMAN Optimisation at Milano Linate Airport

CATFM CENTRAL AIR TRAFFIC FLOW MANAGEMENT ( C-ATFM ) INDIA. ATFM TF 1 Meeting September 2018

Global 8 ATFM Conference 4 6 November 2014 Cancun, Mexico

CTP PILOT BRIEFING EDDK 2015

GATWICK NIGHT MOVEMENT AND QUOTA ALLOCATION PROCEDURES

SAFETY ASSESSMENT OF AIRPORT COLLABORATIVE DECISION MAKING (A-CDM)

Contributions of Advanced Taxi Time Calculation to Airport Operations Efficiency

Traffic Flow Management

LINKING EXISTING ON GROUND, ARRIVAL AND DEPARTURE OPERATIONS. Abstract Description of LEONARDO System, a CDM integrated System

CENTRAL AIR TRAFFIC FLOW MANAGEMENT ( C-ATFM ) INDIA CATFM. ATFM Global Symposium /22/2017 ATFM Global Symposium 2017

TWELFTH AIR NAVIGATION CONFERENCE

THE CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY OF THAILAND. Aeronautical Information Service Department AIP SUPPLEMENT

Multi Nodal Regional ATFM/CDM Concept and Operational Trials Colombo 7 May 2014

Curriculum for AIM Training Module 2: ARO Officer

Air Traffic Management during VTBS RWY 01R/19L Maintenance

ICAO ATFM SEMINAR. Dubai, UAE, 14 December 2016

RECOMMENDED GUIDANCE FOR FPL AND RELATED ATS MESSAGES

Nikolaos Papagiannopoulos. Juan Francisco García Lopez

Ground movement safety systems and procedures - an overview

THIRTEENTH AIR NAVIGATION CONFERENCE

U.S. Domestic CPDLC-DCL Users Guide. DATA COMMUNICATIONS INTEGRATED SERVICES (DCIS) Harris Corporation

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 255/2010 of 25 March 2010 laying down common rules on air traffic flow management

Safety Assessment of Airport Collaborative Decision Making (A- CDM)

ICAO Bay of Bengal ATS Coordination Group ATFM Task Force

Good radio calls not only sound professional, they help ATC and alleviate stress in the cockpit!

THE CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY OF THAILAND. Aeronautical Information Service Department AIP SUPPLEMENT

Aircraft movements and parking stands

VFR PHRASEOLOGY. The word IMMEDIATELY should only be used when immediate action is required for safety reasons.

Beijing, 18 h of September 2014 Pierre BACHELIER Head of ATM Programme. Cockpit Initiatives. ATC Global 2014

AIR TRAFFIC FLOW MANAGEMENT INDIA S PERSPECTIVE. Vineet Gulati GM(ATM-IPG), AAI

Description Docking Guidance System. Honeywell PA3+

SERA AND CAP694 (THE UK FLIGHT PLANNING GUIDE) - GUIDANCE. Correct to 1 May This document is for guidance only and is subject to change.

AOP-NOP Integration. Airports CDM Information Exchange Dr. Alexandra von Eckartsberg

Civil-Military ATM Coordination. Edgar REUBER EUROCONTROL/DECMA/CMC/ARD September, 12th 2018

PDC VERSUS DCL. Southwest Airlines. Data Comm Update 2/26/2016

Airport Departure Flow Management System (ADFMS) Architecture. SYST 798 / OR 680 April 22, Project Sponsor: Dr. Lance Sherry, CATSR

and the Environment Speaker: Guy Viselé External Communication Advisor ABC User Committee, February 2 nd 2009

Pilot Briefing Document Cross The Pond 2013 Heathrow Airport EGLL/LHR

TWELFTH AIR NAVIGATION CONFERENCE

ATM STRATEGIC PLAN VOLUME I. Optimising Safety, Capacity, Efficiency and Environment AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA DIRECTORATE OF AIR TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT

MAST 16 th December 2009

USE OF RADAR IN THE APPROACH CONTROL SERVICE

AIR TRAFFIC FLOW MANAGEMENT

ADB Actual Deicing Begin process status. ADE Actual Deicing End process status

TRANSPONDER WITH IVAC

NATIONAL BUSINESS AVIATION ASSOCIATION (NBAA) CONVENTION

Transcription:

Airport CDM Flight Crew Briefing Deutsche Harmonisierung AIRPORT COLLABORATIVE DECISION MAKING AIRPORT CDM at Hamburg Airport (HAM) Flight Crew Briefing English Version: 0.1 Author: Airport CDM Team HAM Date: 03.02.2015 Number of pages: 7

TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. General... 3 1.1. Definition... 3 2. Target Off Block Time (TOBT)... 4 2.1. Automated TOBT... 4 2.2. Person responsible for TOBT... 4 2.3. TOBT input and adjustment... 4 2.4. TOBT- deletion... 5 2.5. TOBT reporting channels... 5 3. Target Start Up Approval Time... 5 3.1. TOBT and TSAT handling in extreme situations... 5 4. Start-Up and Push-Back... 6 4.1. Datalink Clearance - DCL... 6 4.2. Changes within the sequence... 6 4.3. De-icing... 7 4.3.1. Remote de-icing... Fehler! Textmarke nicht definiert. 4.4. Coordination with NMOC... 7 4.5. Remote Holding... 7 5. Aeronautical Information Publication (AIP)... 7 Airport CDM@HAM Flight Crew Briefing Version 0.1 Page 2

1. General This document describes the Airport Collaborative Decision Making (CDM) process at HAM Airport. It is to be understood and used as information material for flight crews. Together with the publications about Airport CDM (AIP Germany, AIP AD2 and the Airport User Regulations FBO), this document is to ensure that Airport CDM at HAM Airport is handled in an optimal way in the interest of all partners. A detailed description of the process is also available as a "brief description". This document will become effective with the commencement of A-CDM operation at HAM Airport and supersedes any previous versions. 1.1. Definition Airport CDM facilitates the optimal handling of turn-round processes in operations at HAM Airport. It covers the period of time between the Estimated Off-Block Time (EOBT) minus three hours and take-off and is a coherent process from flight planning (ATC flight plan) to landing and the subsequent turn-round process on the ground before the next take-off. Airport CDM Definition and Partners Airport CDM is an operational overall process (concept/procedure) supporting an optimized turnround process at an airport. Airport CDM aims to optimize the operational cooperation with all partners Air Traffic Control All Airlines and Ground handlers Central flow management unit (CFMU) Airport Airport (CDM) - one operational process = ATC Flight plan / Arrival / Turn-round/ Take Off Airport CDM Verfahren comprises the time period EOBT-3hr till Take Off Airport CDM at HAM Airport is based on the European standard for Airport CDM, the common specification for Airport CDM ( Community Specification ) and the initiative "Deutsche Harmonisierung von Airport CDM" (German Harmonisation of Airport CDM). Airport CDM@HAM Flight Crew Briefing Version 0.1 Page 3

2. Target Off Block Time (TOBT) TOBT is a reference time used for all ground handling processes except for aircraft pushback and de-icing. This time is used for coordination, since it is the best available time for that purpose. TOBT is the prediction of aircraft ready. 2.1. Automated TOBT At fixed times, a TOBT for an outbound flight is generated automatically. The earliest time for the publication of the automatically generated TOBT is either at estimated landing time (ELDT) of the previous inbound flight minus 30 minutes or at EOBT minus 90 minutes, depending on the latest event. If the TOBT is not generated automatically, it has to be entered by the responsible person for TOBT as follows. 2.2. Person responsible for TOBT Airlines have to ensure: the nomination of one person responsible for the TOBT the communication with the relevant airline (ATC flight plan/person responsible for the EOBT) and the coordination of internal working procedures. The person responsible for the TOBT, the handling agent, the airline (for flights without handling agents) or the Pilot-In-Command/Flight Crew (for general aviation flights without handling agent) is responsible for TOBT correctness and adherence. A wrong TOBT leads to disadvantages for further sequencing and/or CTOT allocation of regulated flights. Therefore, the TOBT has to be adjusted as early as possible. 2.3. TOBT input and adjustment The following facts have to be taken into account for the input and/or adjustment of the TOBT: the TOBT can be adjusted as often as necessary until the TSAT has been issued after the TSAT has been issued, the TOBT can only be corrected three times any new TOBT has to be at least five minutes later than the current time As the TOBT is also the basis for further airport processes, adjustments of the TOBT (also if the new value is more than five minutes earlier than the one previously entered) are to be entered by the person responsible for the TOBT. Airport CDM@HAM Flight Crew Briefing Version 0.1 Page 4

2.4. TOBT- deletion The TOBT has to be deleted in the following cases: the TOBT is unknown (e.g. technical problems with the aircraft) the permitted number of TOBT inputs (three times) after the generation of the TSAT has been exceeded. If the TOBT is deleted, the TSAT is automatically deleted as well. If a new TOBT is known and the process shall continue, the person responsible for the TOBT has to enter a new TOBT. 2.5. TOBT reporting channels The TOBT is reported and/or adjusted in one of the following ways: Via the person responsible for the TOBT Via the person responsible for the TOBT at the GAT Exceptionally via Tower (Hamburg GROUND) 3. Target Start-Up Approval Time The TSAT is the target time for start-up approval according to the A-CDM procedure. The pre-departure sequence is based on the flights with a calculated TSAT. The TSAT is published 40 minutes prior to the entered TOBT. The TSAT is transmitted via the same communication channels as the TOBT. As a rule, TSAT and any changes to the TSAT are transmitted to the person responsible for the TOBT who then forwards them to the flight crew/pilots. When the Datalink procedure (DCL) is used for clearances, TSAT will additionally be transmitted directly into the cockpit. 3.1. TOBT and TSAT handling in extreme situations If the TOBT and TSAT show a difference of more than 90 minutes, the ground handling process has to be completed before TOBT. This does not apply to passenger boarding. Passenger boarding has to be completed at the latest by TSAT minus 60 minutes. Airport CDM@HAM Flight Crew Briefing Version 0.1 Page 5

4. Start-Up and Push-Back Start-up (ASAT) and push-back (AOBT) clearances are issued taking into account the TOBT and TSAT. The following rules shall apply: The aircraft has to be ready for start-up and/or remote de-icing at TOBT. In principle the timeframe for start-up approval and en-route clearance is TSAT ± five minutes o o The pilot should request start-up approval and en-route clearance at TSAT ± five minutes. Hamburg GROUND issues the start-up approval and en-route clearance depending on TSAT and the current traffic situation. The push-back (nose-in positions) / taxi clearance has to be requested not later than five minutes after the start-up approval has been issued. In case of delays Hamburg GROUND has to be informed. Otherwise the TOBT will be deleted and will have to be re-entered. 4.1. Datalink Clearance - DCL The published procedures and the time parameters published in the AIP AD 2 EDDH continue to apply to datalink departure clearances (DCL). The TSAT is transmitted via CLD (departure clearance uplink message issue of the start-up approval and en-route clearance by Hamburg GROUND). Start Up approved TSAT <hh:mm> The push-back/taxi clearance has to be requested at TSAT ± 5 minutes. Example: DCL with Start up approval and En route clearance QU QXSXMXS.MUCDFYA 110454 CLD AN D-AHFX/MA 767A - /MUCDFYA.DC1/CLD 0454 070311 EDDM PDC 001 HLF111 CLRD TO LPFR OFF 26L VIA AMPEG1S SQUAWK 3553 ADT MDI NEXT FREQ 121.775 AT IS D STARTUP APPROVED TSAT 05:00 DCL only with En route clearance QU QXSXMXS.MUCDFYA 110818 CLD AN D-ACPQ/MA 891A - /MUCDFYA.DC1/CLD 0818 070311 EDDM PDC 001 DLH06M CLRD TO LFBO OFF 08R VIA AMPEG1E SQUAWK 3545 ADT MDI NEXT FREQ 121.725 AT IS J STANDBY ON 121.725 FOR STARTUP TSAT 08:30 4.2. Changes within the sequence After the TSAT has been calculated, the sequence of flights can be changed within the area of responsibility of the person responsible for the TOBT. If flights have a CTOT, it must be assured that these flights can still adhere to their respective slots after the sequence change. Airport CDM@HAM Flight Crew Briefing Version 0.1 Page 6

4.3. De-icing De-icing in Hamburg is only provided on the parking stands. The aircraft has to be ready for de-icing at TOBT. It must have completed de-icing by TSAT. 4.4. Coordination with NMOC The general NMOC procedures remain the same. In addition, during the turn-round process local Target Take-Off Times (TTOT) will be automatically calculated and transmitted to the NMOC. In case of longer delay, which is under the responsibility of the airline, the standard CTOT allocation will apply, but will be fine tuned by the local TTOT. Generally NMOC will take the local TTOT into consideration for CTOT calculation and try to adjust it accordingly. If an adjustment/extension is not sufficient, DFS (Hamburg GROUND) offers to coordinate a new CTOT in consultation with the Pilot-In-Command/Flight Crew. 4.5. Remote Holding Requirements for remote holding: TOBT and TSAT deviate from each other by more than 15 minutes and The parking position in use is needed for another aircraft A Remote Holding will be advised by the ACC or Apron Control. 5. Aeronautical Information Publication (AIP) The Airport CDM procedure at HAM Airport is published in AIP Germany, Volume II, AD2-EDDH, section AD 2. Airport CDM@HAM Flight Crew Briefing Version 0.1 Page 7