Crosswind-based wake avoidance system approved by the FAA for operational use. Clark Lunsford (MITRE) & Dr. Edward Johnson May 15-16, 2013

Similar documents
Wake Vortex R&D. Status Briefing. NBAA Convention. Federal Aviation Administration. By: Steve Lang Date: September 2007

Appendix B Ultimate Airport Capacity and Delay Simulation Modeling Analysis

FAA Progress on Wake Avoidance Solutions for Closely Spaced Parallel Runways (CSPR)

Wake Turbulence Evolution in the United States

Automated Integration of Arrival and Departure Schedules

Airport Characterization for the Adaptation of Surface Congestion Management Approaches*

WakeNet3-Europe Concepts Workshop

Evaluation of Strategic and Tactical Runway Balancing*

Analysis of Operational Impacts of Continuous Descent Arrivals (CDA) using runwaysimulator

Outmaneuvered AIRFLOW

According to FAA Advisory Circular 150/5060-5, Airport Capacity and Delay, the elements that affect airfield capacity include:

KSFO RNAV TO GLS DEMONSTRATION

2. CANCELLATION. AC 90-23F, Aircraft Wake Turbulence, dated February 20, 2002, is canceled.

Airfield Capacity Prof. Amedeo Odoni

FAA RECAT Phase I Operational Experience

Saint Petersburg-Clearwater International Airport. Airspace & Instrument Approach Analysis

Integrated SWIM. Federal Aviation Administration Presented to: Interregional APAC/EUR/MID Workshop>

Cockpit Display of Traffic Information (CDTI) Assisted Visual Separation (CAVS)

System Oriented Runway Management: A Research Update

Data Analysis and Simula/on Tools Prof. Hamsa Balakrishnan

Draft Concept Alternatives Analysis for the Inaugural Airport Program September 2005

The purpose of this Demand/Capacity. The airfield configuration for SPG. Methods for determining airport AIRPORT DEMAND CAPACITY. Runway Configuration

Wake Turbulence Recategorization (RECAT) ATC Human Factors Issues During Implementation. Terminal Services

Atlanta NextGen PBN Activities

This section sets forth all Los Angeles World Airports (LAWA) noise abatement procedures, restrictions, and regulations involving aircraft operations.

Advancing FTD technologies and the opportunity to the pilot training journey. L3 Proprietary

Noise Oversight Committee

Seychelles Civil Aviation Authority. Telecomm & Information Services Unit

Surveillance and Broadcast Services

Wake Turbulence Standards

Continuous Descent Arrivals (CDA) Workshop #2

NextGen Priorities: Multiple Runway Operations & RECAT

NextGen and ASPIRE Environmental Initiatives

Wake Turbulence Research Modeling

SIMMOD Simulation Airfield and Airspace Simulation Report. Oakland International Airport Master Plan Preparation Report. Revised: January 6, 2006

Technical Report. Aircraft Noise Analysis. Portola Valley and Woodside, California. July Prepared by: Aircraft Noise Abatement Office

(Presented by the United States)

Gogo Connected Aircraft Services

AIRCRAFT NOISE INFORMATION PACK: CANNING VALE

Washington Dulles International Airport (IAD) Aircraft Noise Contour Map Update

WAKE TURBULENCE MITIGATION FOR ARRIVALS (WTMA)

Noise Abatement Arrival Procedures at Louisville International Airport. Prof. John-Paul Clarke Georgia Institute of Technology

A Methodology for Environmental and Energy Assessment of Operational Improvements

CATCODE ] CATCODE

NOISE ABATEMENT PROCEDURES

FAA GBAS Program Update January 29, 2010

March 2016 Safety Meeting

DIRECCION DE PERSONAL AERONAUTICO DPTO. DE INSTRUCCION PREGUNTAS Y OPCIONES POR TEMA

Partnership for AiR Transportation Noise and Emissions Reduction. MIT Lincoln Laboratory

CHAPTER 4 DEMAND/CAPACITY ANALYSIS

Operational Demonstration of a Performance-Based Separation Standard at The Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport

Massport Study Team Evaluation of CAC Noise Study Alternatives. October 2010

Hartford-Brainard Airport Potential Runway Closure White Paper

APPENDIX D MSP Airfield Simulation Analysis

ATC-Wake: Integrated Air Traffic Control Wake Vortex Safety and Capacity System

FAA Surface CDM. Collaborative Decision Making and Airport Operations. Date: September 25-27, 2017

Reduced Surface Emissions through Airport Surface Movement Optimization. Prof. Hamsa Balakrishnan. Prof. R. John Hansman

Date Planned/Implemented December Status Developing. Date Planned/Implemented Before May Status Implemented

ATM STRATEGIC PLAN VOLUME I. Optimising Safety, Capacity, Efficiency and Environment AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA DIRECTORATE OF AIR TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT

Aircraft Arrival Sequencing: Creating order from disorder

PASSUR Aerospace Annual Shareholder Meeting, April 5, 2017

ACI-NA Conference NextGen at NAV CANADA. John Crichton President and Chief Executive Officer October 11, 2009

ANALYSIS OF POTENTIAL BENEFITS OF WIND DEPENDENT PARALLEL ARRIVAL OPERATIONS

Current practice of separation delivery at major European airports ATM R&D Seminar, June 2015, Lisbon

B0 FRTO, B0-NOPS, B0-ASUR and B0-ACAS Implementation in the AFI and MID Regions

Recommended Performance Measures

Continuous Descent? And RNAV Arrivals

Benefits Analysis of a Runway Balancing Decision-Support Tool

Operators may need to retrofit their airplanes to ensure existing fleets are properly equipped for RNP operations. aero quarterly qtr_04 11

RNP AR APCH Approvals: An Operator s Perspective

Potential Use of Aircraft Derived Meteorological Data for Wake Turbulence Applications

National Transportation Safety Board Aviation Incident Final Report

Updates to Procedures at St. John s International Airport

Validation Results of Airport Total Operations Planner Prototype CLOU. FAA/EUROCONTROL ATM Seminar 2007 Andreas Pick, DLR

Next Generation Air Transportation System. Edward L. Bolton, Jr. Assistant Administrator for NextGen 17 November 2015

O Hare Noise Compatibility Commission Technical Committee April 19, Proposed Interim Fly Quiet Runway Rotation Plan

Application of Wake Turbulence Separation at London Heathrow. Paul Johnson Development Manager NATS Heathrow

SPADE-2 - Supporting Platform for Airport Decision-making and Efficiency Analysis Phase 2

ANALYZING IMPACT FACTORS OF AIRPORT TAXIING DELAY BASED ON ADS-B DATA

FAA: ASBU Deployment Status. ASBU Prepared by: Midori Tanino, ATO International NextGen Lead Date: August, 2016

To optimize Wake Vortex separations. Fabrice ORLANDI THALES AIR SYSTEMS

AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA S AIRPORT COLLABORATIVE DECISION MAKING SYSTEM. (Presented by Airports Authority of India) SUMMARY

Chapter 6. Nonradar. Section 1. General DISTANCE

American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics

Performance Evaluation of Individual Aircraft Based Advisory Concept for Surface Management

AN-Conf/12-WP/162 TWELFTH THE CONFERENCE. The attached report

Federal Aviation Administration Flight Plan Presented at the Canadian Aviation Safety Seminar April 20, 2004

Research Challenges Associated with Unmanned Aircraft Systems Airspace Integration

S2 Tower Controller. Allama Iqbal Int l Airport Lahore ( OPLA ) June 2016 Pakistan vacc

Appendix 6.1: Hazard Worksheet

Chapter 3. Demand/Capacity & Facility Requirements

Aviation Noise and Emissions Symposium February 27, 2018

Chapter III - Demand/Capacity and Facility Requirements

Study Committee Meeting. September 2015

Gleim Private Pilot Syllabus Fifth Edition, 3rd Printing Updates March 2016

Reducing Departure Delays at LaGuardia Airport with Departure-Sensitive Arrival Spacing (DSAS) Operations

Airport Simulation Technology in Airport Planning, Design and Operating Management

RNP AR and Air Traffic Management

Public Information Meeting. September 2015

USA Near-Term Progress for Closely Spaced Parallel Runways

Transcription:

Crosswind-based wake avoidance system approved by the FAA for operational use Clark Lunsford (MITRE) & Dr. Edward Johnson May 15-16, 2013

Outline WTMD Concept Order signed authorizing WTMD operations WTMD Significance Data Collection Plan Test Site Configuration Summary & Next Steps 2

WTMD Concept 3 Knot Crosswind ± 60 0 Runway centerlines separated by less than 2500 WTMD Wind Requirements A direct crosswind plus or minus 60 degrees, and wind velocity of 3 knots or greater WTMD Weather Minima Ceiling 1,000 above ground level or higher, and visibility 3 miles or greater Controller Computer Interface Green Light / Red Light and aural alerts will notify controllers when standard wake turbulence separation for departures can or cannot be waived. Supervisors will have the capability to authorize or terminate wake independent departure operations via the WTMD interface 3

WTMD Benefit Mechanisms WTMD focuses on increasing departure rates at airports with closely spaced parallel runways spaced less than 2500 feet apart When wind conditions are favorable, WTMD allows independent departures on parallel runways after Heavy Jet or B757 takes off from the adjacent downwind runway 2 to 3 minute departure wake mitigation wait time eliminated All aircraft waiting in the upwind runway departure queue benefit from elimination of the wake mitigation wait time after a Heavy or B757 departure Fuel savings Time savings for airlines, air traffic control, and passengers Reduction in emissions Additional departure slots available for surface management functions to utilize Runway Queue When Heavy or B757 Departs Heavy Aircraft Houston Intercontinental (IAH) Departure Queue Example

WTMD Approvals WTMD Order JO 7110.316 signed and published Wake Separation Reduction Approved by AOV System Change (integrating WTMD into the National Airspace System) approved for three operational demonstration sites Some WTMD system components & data interfaces already installed 5

WTMD Significance The first FAA approved system to dynamically reduce required separations between aircraft based on meteorology Increases airport departure capacity under visual meteorological conditions Allows aircraft departing from the upwind runway of a pair of closely spaced parallel runways (CSPR) to depart without a delay for wake turbulence after a Heavy or B757 aircraft has departed from the adjacent downwind runway When forecasted and observed crosswinds exceed certain criteria t Current flight rules required a 2 minute (or 3 minutes for intersection departures) delay for wake turbulence avoidance

Current Situation WTMD operational demonstrations begin at 3 candidate airports this year SFO Today 15 May 2013 IAH no later than June 3, 2013 MEM tentatively July 2013 Training complete at SFO & IAH for controllers & supervisors These operational demos will provide the full range of benefits for WTMD SFO high benefit site due to strong crosswinds and current airport procedures IAH lower benefit due to limited availability MEM mid-level benefit 7 additional sites have been identified as candidates for WTMD implementation at the conclusion of the ops demos 7

Data Collection Plan On site at each of the operational prototype sites Log entries and feedback from Tower Supervisor and controllers Particularly useful to determine why WTMD not used when available Observers will be stationed in the Tower periodically Input/output and usage data archived locally Local technical support reports will identify installation problems (if any) Remote monitoring of WTMD system(s) by FAA Secure communications permit the FAA to remotely monitor and retrieve data from operational prototype sites Compare performance of fielded systems with independently operated WTMD algorithms run in shadow mode by the FAA Tech Center System problems (if any) automatically reported to FAA Tech Center Will trigger maintenance actions Coordinated with local onsite tech support Additional sources of data collected for analysis purposes ASDE-X to determine departure queues OOOI taxi delay, ASQP taxi out time/pushback delay, CountOps runway assignment, ETMS 8

WTMD Site Configuration

WTMD On Site Hardware

WTMD Technical Maturity & Costs WTMD is implementation ready Commercially available hardware Software is fully developed and tested Training is developed Implementation costs for all sites after operational demonstration are low ~ $61,000/site nonrecurring, ~$46,000/site/year for recurring 11

Summary & Next Steps The WTMD system is ready for implementation System is mature, safety approvals are granted Given the low marginal cost of the WTMD system, application at many airports is possible AJT has requested authority to make implementation decisions at the 10 candidate airports without further AMS process investments Awaiting response from the FAA JRC Implementation decisions will be based on airport interest and potential cost/benefit 12

Summary & Next Steps (continued) High level analysis allows insight into relative quantitative benefit at each airport Qualitative benefits can have a large impact on airport selection as well Next Steps: Perform a more detailed analysis of the WTMD candidate sites Account for known issues to ensure airports maximize potential benefits of WTMD Apply insights gained from WTMD system turn-on at IAH, MEM, and SFO to this analysis 13

Questions?