The NAT OPS Bulletin Checklist, available at (Documents, NAT Docs), contains an up to date list of all current NAT Ops Bulletins.

Similar documents
This NAT OPS Bulletin supersedes NAT OPS Bulletin, Serial Number: Summary of Changes

The NAT OPS Bulletin Checklist, available at (Documents, NAT Docs), contains an up to date list of all current NAT Ops Bulletins.

NAT OPS Bulletin Checklist Issued/Effective: 11 June 2012

The NAT OPS Bulletin Checklist is available at & NAT Documents, NAT Documents, then NAT Ops Bulletins.

Any queries about the content of the attached document should be addressed to: ICAO EUR/NAT Office:

This Bulletin may be updated, as necessary, as progress is made toward the start date for Phase 2b of the NAT DLM.

Any queries about the content of the attached document should be addressed to: ICAO EUR/NAT Office:

The purpose of North Atlantic Operations Bulletin is to distribute the new issue of the Oceanic Errors Safety Bulletin (OESB).

[EFFECTIVE DATE: 23 AUG 2012]

The purpose of North Atlantic Operations Bulletin is to promulgate the Sample Expanded Oceanic Checklist.

Data Link Checklist. As of: 9/10/2017 1

AERONAUTICAL INFORMATION CIRCULAR 33/17

The purpose of North Atlantic Operations Bulletin is to promulgate the Sample Oceanic Checklist and the Sample Expanded Oceanic Checklist.

Note: Grey shading indicates modifications or additions to NAT OPS Bulletin 2015_003 Rev 45 text.

Appendix A COMMUNICATION BEST PRACTICES

Consider problems and make specific recommendations concerning the provision of ATS/AIS/SAR in the Asia Pacific Region LOST COMMUNICATION PROCEDURES

Subject: Application of Data Link services within Kolkata FIR

Application Form and Compliance Checklist - OPS for NAT HLA (MNPS) Approval FORM Operator:

The NAT OPS Bulletin Checklist is available at EUR & NAT Documents, NAT Documents, then NAT Ops Bulletins.

GENERAL REPORT. Reduced Lateral Separation Minima RLatSM Phase 2. RLatSM Phase 3

RECOMMENDED GUIDANCE FOR FPL AND RELATED ATS MESSAGES

CLEARANCE INSTRUCTION READ BACK

NAT RLATSM PHASE 2 UPDATE - GUIDANCE FOR U.S

Official Journal of the European Union L 186/27

Subject : Correct application of the strategic lateral offset procedures

Excerpt from AIP CHINA published by CAAC version (EFF ) ENR L888, Y1, Y2

NATS Operational CPDLC Capability Prestwick and Swanwick centres

ADS-B Exclusion List

TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION...

CIVIL AVIATION PUBLICATION CAP 10 CPDLC

GOLD. Global Operational Data Link Document (GOLD) Implementation and Amendments. AFI CNS SG /4, Dakar, Senegal, July 2011

OVERSEAS TERRITORIES AVIATION REQUIREMENTS (OTARs)

Federal Aviation Administration Operations in the New York Center Oceanic CTA/FIR

MNPS (HLA), Oceanic, and Contingency Procedures

REPUBLIC OF SEYCHELLES CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY AERONAUTICAL INFORMATION SERVICE P.O.BOX 181, VICTORIA SEYCHELLES

Contents. Subpart A General 91.1 Purpose... 7

Air Traffic Management

SERA AND CAP694 (THE UK FLIGHT PLANNING GUIDE) - GUIDANCE. Correct to 1 May This document is for guidance only and is subject to change.

OVERSEAS TERRITORIES AVIATION REQUIREMENTS (OTARs)

NAT OPS BULLETIN 2014_001 Sample Oceanic Checklists SAMPLE OCEANIC CHECKLIST as of 4 February 2014

LETTER OF AGREEMENT. Between. and RELATING TO

NBAA IOC Oceanic Operations

23 July To: IFATCA Member Associations. Dear colleagues

Manual on Monitoring the Application of Performance-based Horizontal Separation Minima

Performance Based Communications Surveillance (PBCS) in the North Atlantic Organized Track System

TANZANIA CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY AIR NAVIGATION SERVICES INSPECTORATE. Title: CONSTRUCTION OF VISUAL AND INSTRUMENT FLIGHT PROCEDURES

Chapter 6. Brize Radar, Speedbird 213 Heavy, request radar advisory. Speedbird 123 change call sign to BA 123

FLIGHT DISPATCH MANUAL

AIRCRAFT INCIDENT REPORT

What you should know: Future Air Navigation System (FANS)

AIP KUWAIT FIR AMENDMENT 28 IMPLEMENTATION AIRAC DATE 25 NOVEMBER 2004

Flight Operations Inspector Manual

U.S. Domestic CPDLC Flight and Route Planning Guide

CIVIL AVIATION REGULATIONS SURINAME PART 17 - AERONAUTICAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS VERSION 5.0

CHAPTER 4 AIR TRAFFIC SERVICES

GOLD Chapter 4 Controller Procedures

AUTOMATIC DEPENDENT SURVEILLANCE BROADCAST (ADS-B) IMPLEMENTATION IN INDONESIA

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION. National Policy

Safety and Airspace Regulation Group. 31 May Policy Statement STANDARD INSTRUMENT DEPARTURE TRUNCATION POLICY.

U.S. Domestic CPDLC-DCL Users Guide. DATA COMMUNICATIONS INTEGRATED SERVICES (DCIS) Harris Corporation

AERONAUTICAL INFORMATION CIRCULAR

Entry of Flight Identity

AERONAUTICAL INFORMATION CIRCULAR Belgium and Luxembourg

Guidelines for Workflow of AIP AMDT, AIP SUP & AIRAC at Iraq CAA AIS HQ

NOVEMBER 2014 UPDATE NAT ATS SURVELLANCE AIRSPACE PHASE 2 OF THE NORTH ATLANTIC REGIONAL DATA LINK MANDATE

RNP 2 JOB AID REQUEST TO CONDUCT RNP 2 OPERATIONS

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION N

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA OFFICE OF DIRECTOR GENERAL OF CIVIL AVIATION

THIS BULLETIN REPLACES BULLETIN WHICH IS NO LONGER CURRENT AND HAS BEEN WITHDRAWN.

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 255/2010 of 25 March 2010 laying down common rules on air traffic flow management

Performance Based Communication and Surveillance in the ICAO North Atlantic Region. PBCS in NAT HLA

Annex III to ED Decision 2017/023/R. AMC and GM to Part-CAT Issue 2, Amendment 13

COVER SHEET. Reduced Vertical Separation Minimum (RVSM) Information Sheet Part 91 RVSM Letter of Authorization

S E L F B R I E F I N G U S E R M A N U A L

Conditions of Carriage

AIP ENR JORDAN 12 DEC 2013 RADAR SERVICES AND PROCEDURES

Table of Contents. Page 2 of 48

Part 175. Aeronautical Information Service Organisations Certification. CAA Consolidation. 10 March 2017

INTERNATIONAL CIVIL AVIATION ORGANIZATION WESTERN AND CENTRAL AFRICA OFFICE. Thirteenth Meeting of the FANS I/A Interoperability Team (SAT/FIT/13)

AIR LAW AND ATC PROCEDURES

CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY, PAKISTAN OPERATIONAL CONTROL SYSTEMS CONTENTS

AMC ICAO DOC 9613 AMC 20-4 ICAO DOC 9613 TGL-10 ICAO DOC 9613 AMC AMC AMC ICAO DOC 70300

This Advisory Circular provides guidance to facilitate compliance with the requirements for a Flight Radiotelephone Operator rating.

CPDLC-DCL U.S. Airports

AFI REGIONAL DATA LINK MONITORING AGENCY (DL/CMRA)

ENR-5 FLIGHT PLANNING

Appendix F ICAO MODEL RUNWAY INCURSION INITIAL REPORT FORM

SECTION 2 INTERNATIONAL OCEANIC AIRSPACE NOTICES

INSTRUCTIONS FOR USING THIS SAMPLE FLIGHT MANUAL SUPPLEMENT

International Civil Aviation Organization REVIEW OF STATE CONTINGENCY PLANNING REQUIREMENTS. (Presented by the Secretariat) SUMMARY

AIRAC AIP SUPPLEMENT A 16/17 08 June 2017

SPECIAL PROCEDURES FOR IN-FLIGHT CONTINGENCIES IN OCEANIC AIRSPACE OF SEYCHELLES FIR

A Letter of Agreement Between: Robin Hood Airport Doncaster Sheffield and British Gliding Association

Global Operational Data Link Doc 10037

FIT FOR PURPOSE: A Guide to Using NAV CANADA Aeronautical Publications SECTION B PUBLICATION SPECIFIC FIT FOR PURPOSE INFORMATION

ADS-B Implementation and Regulation Meeting for the NAM/CAR/SAM Regions 26 to 30 November 2018 Mexico City, Mexico

(Presented by Japan) SUMMARY

REPUBLIC OF SINGAPORE AERONAUTICAL INFORMATION SERVICES CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY OF SINGAPORE SINGAPORE CHANGI AIRPORT P.O. BOX 1, SINGAPORE

(Presented by the Secretariat)

ICAO Changes to the Present Flight Plan Form. Amendment 1 to the PANS-ATM Fifteenth Edition (PANS-ATM, Doc 4444) Tom Brady ICAO HQ

Transcription:

Serial Number: 2010-013 Subject: Reykjavik OCD Crew Procedures Version 1 Issued: 3 June 2010 The purpose of North Atlantic Operations Bulletin 2010-013 is to provide information from ISAVIA concerning a delay to the planned delivery of oceanic clearances via data link. The Reykjavik Oceanic Area Control Centre (OAC) provides an air traffic control service within the Reykjavik Oceanic Control Area (OCA). Data Link Oceanic Clearance Delivery (OCD) service is provided via VHF and satellite to ACARS equipped aircraft via network service providers ARINC and SITA. Please see the attached document. NOTICE NAT Ops Bulletins are used to distribute information on behalf of the North Atlantic Systems Planning Group (NAT SPG). The material contained therein may be developed within the working structure of the NAT SPG or be third party documents posted at the request of a NAT SPG Member State. A printed or electronic copy of this Bulletin, plus any associated documentation, is provided to the recipient as is and without any warranties as to its description, condition, quality, fitness for purpose or functionality and for use by the recipient solely for guidance only. The information published by ICAO in this document is made available without warranty of any kind; the Organization accepts no responsibility or liability whether direct or indirect, as to the currency, accuracy or quality of the information, nor for any consequence of its use. The designations and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of ICAO concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The NAT OPS Bulletin Checklist, available at www.paris.icao.int (Documents, NAT Docs), contains an up to date list of all current NAT Ops Bulletins. There is no objection to the reproduction of extracts of information contained in this Bulletin if the source is acknowledged.

REYKJAVIK DATA LINK OCEANIC CLEARANCE DELIVERY (OCD) CREW PROCEDURES Reykjavik Oceanic Area Control Centre Operations Building Reykjavik Data Link OCD Version 1 Page 1 of 11

Contents Contents... 2 Summary of Changes... 3 Abbreviations... 3 1. Introduction... 4 2. Requesting Clearance... 5 3. Clearance Delivery... 6 4. Clearance Acknowledgement... 6 5. Clearance Negotiation... 7 6. Reclearances... 7 7. Time Revisions... 7 8. RCL and CLA Errors... 8 9. Terms Used in the ATC/ Line... 9 9. Explanation of Data Link Clearance Elements... 10 Any Queries relating to this document should be addressed to: Bjarni K. Stefansson Reykjavik Oceanic Area Control Centre e-mail: procedures@isavia.is Reykjavik Data Link OCD Version 1 Page 2 of 11

Summary of Changes Version 1 is the original version of the document and there are therefore no changes. Abbreviations ACARS AFIS ARINC * CLA * CLX * CTA ETA FDPS HF ICAO NAT OAC OCA OCD * OEP * RCL * SITA * TMI * VHF Aircraft Communications, Addressing and Reporting System Aerodrome Flight Information Service Aeronautical Radio Incorporated Clearance Acknowledgement downlink message Oceanic Clearance uplink message Control Area Estimated Time of Arrival Flight Data Processing System High Frequency International Civil Aviation Organization North Atlantic Oceanic Area Control Centre Oceanic Control Area Oceanic Clearance Delivery Oceanic Entry Point Request Oceanic Clearance downlink mesage Société Internationale de Télécommunications Aéronautiques Track Message Ident number Very High Frequency * designates an abbreviation that is not included in ICAO DOC8400 ICAO Abbreviations and Codes. Reykjavik Data Link OCD Version 1 Page 3 of 11

1. Introduction 1.1 The Reykjavik Oceanic Area Control Centre (OAC) provides an air traffic control service within the Reykjavik Oceanic Control Area (OCA). Data Link Oceanic Clearance Delivery (OCD) service is provided via VHF and satellite to ACARS equipped aircraft via network service providers ARINC and SITA. If the flight crew is uncertain about any aspect of the data link OCD process, they should contact: Iceland Radio on HF, VHF or SATCOM voice; or Reykjavik Control on VHF. 1.2 The OCD service is implemented in accordance with the standard Data-Link Application System Document (DLASD) for the Oceanic Clearance Data-Link Service ED-106A. This standard is also frequently referred to as the ARINC Specification 623 for Oceanic Clearance. 1.3 There are no specific flight planning requirements for the Reykjavik OCD service. Reykjavik Data Link OCD Version 1 Page 4 of 11

2. Requesting Clearance 2.1 Each operator of flights that can downlink RCL and CLA messages should ensure that flight crews know how to address them to the Reykjavik OCD system. 2.2 The OCD transaction is initiated in all cases by a downlink oceanic clearance request (RCL). 2.3 Any RCL must contain the following information, as a minimum: Reykjavik Entry Point. ETA for Entry Point. Requested Mach Number. Requested Flight Level. 2.4 Crews may add remarks (RMK/) indicating the preferred alternative to the requested clearance and maximum flight level that can be accepted at the Entry Point. Inclusion of this information can assist the Reykjavik Controller and may expedite the clearance delivery process. 2.5 The call sign in the RCL must match the aircraft identification as contained in the ICAO flight plan, or the RCL will be rejected (see Section 8 RCL and CLA Errors). 2.6 Reykjavik cannot issue oceanic clearances until coordination data has been received from the adjacent air traffic control centre and the flight data has been activated within the Reykjavik Flight Data Processing System (FDPS). This occurs a certain time before the aircraft is estimated to enter the Reykjavik CTA and the time interval varies depending on the control area from which the aircraft enters the Reykjavik CTA. The following can be used as guidelines for the crew to determine when the RCL message can be accepted by the Reykjavik FDPS: Aircraft entering the Reykjavik CTA from the following CTA Stavanger Scottish Edmonton Murmansk Send the RCL when the aircraft is less than this many minutes from the Reykjavik CTA Entry Point 20 minutes 20 minutes 40 minutes 25 minutes Rule of thumb: Send RCL when 15-20 minutes from the Entry Point. 2.7 If the RCL message is received in the Reykjavik FDPS before the flight data has been activated by a coordination message from the transferring centre the FDPS will automatically reject the RCL and send the following message to the aircraft: RCL SENT TOO EARLY REQUEST AGAIN LATER SEND RCL WHEN 15 MINUTES FROM THE BOUNDARY 2.8 The OCD service is not available for flights departing from airports in Iceland, Greenland and the Faroe Islands. The oceanic clearance to those flights is delivered by the appropriate Control Tower or AFIS before departure. 2.9 The crew shall under normal circumstances send the RCL message and obtain the oceanic clearance before entering the Reykjavik CTA. There is however no technical limitation on Reykjavik Data Link OCD Version 1 Page 5 of 11

how late the RCL can be received by the Reykjavik FDPS the system is even capable of processing an RCL message received after the aircraft has entered the CTA. 2.10 The following message indicates that the RCL message has been received and accepted by the Reykjavik FDPS: RCL RECEIVED IF NO CLEARANCE WITHIN 15 MINUTES If this message is not received within 5 minutes of sending the RCL, the crew should request the clearance via voice in accordance with paragraph 4.4. 2.11 The Reykjavik FDPS automatically responds to the RCL message. All possible responses are detailed in Section 8. 3. Clearance Delivery 3.1 Examples of data link oceanic clearances are provided in Section 10. 3.2 The crew must confirm that the callsign in the received CLX message matches the Flight Plan callsign. If the call sign is not correct, the clearance is not valid and the crew must request the oceanic clearance via voice in accordance with paragraph 4.4. 3.3 All oceanic clearances contain the full route of flight to landfall. Clearances along one of the NAT tracks will additionally include the track identifier (NAT A, NAT B etc). Crews must check that the route co-ordinates received match the published NAT track message and query any discrepancy using voice procedures. 3.4 The flight level contained in the data link oceanic clearance is the cleared oceanic flight level for the purposes of complying with the lost communication procedures detailed in the AIP Iceland ENR section 1.8.6 and the North Atlantic Regional Supplementary Procedures (ICAO Doc 7030). If operating at a different level at the time of receipt of the oceanic clearance, then a climb/descent clearance must be requested from the ATS Unit in whose airspace the aircraft is operating an oceanic clearance does NOT constitute a level change instruction. If there is a concern, crews should contact their current air traffic controller. 3.5 If an aircraft is cleared via a different Entry Point from that requested, Reykjavik will calculate an ETA and this will be shown in the clearance. If this ETA differs from that calculated by the crew by 3 minutes or more, Reykjavik must be advised (See section 7). ATC in the airspace immediately before the Oceanic Entry Point is responsible for providing a revised route clearance to enable the flight to reach the new Oceanic Entry Point. 3.6 The CLX may contain additional information, prefixed with the text ATC/. ATC/ messages are detailed in Section 9. 3.7 All Clearance messages terminate with the phrase- END OF MESSAGE. If this text is not present, then data has been lost during transmission and the clearance must be ignored. Crews must revert to voice procedures in accordance with paragraph 4.4. 4. Clearance Acknowledgement 4.1 When a data link oceanic clearance (CLX) is received the crew shall: a) Send a Clearance Acknowledgement message (CLA); or b) Send a new RCL message (refer to Section 5). 4.2 Upon receipt of a valid CLA message, the Reykjavik FDPS will uplink a Clearance Confirmed message. This message indicates that the data link oceanic clearance process is complete and that no further action is required by the crew to acknowledge or verify the Reykjavik Data Link OCD Version 1 Page 6 of 11

oceanic clearance. The clearance transaction is not complete until the confirmation message is received. CLA RECEIVED CLEARANCE CONFIRMED If this message is not received within 5 minutes of sending the CLA, then the data link oceanic clearance must be verified via voice in accordance with paragraphs 4.4 and 4.5. 4.3 If a CLA error message is received, the data link oceanic clearance must be verified via voice in accordance with paragraphs 4.4 and 4.5 (see also Section 8 RCL and CLA Errors). 4.4 If a data link oceanic clearance must be verified or requested via voice then contact: Iceland Radio on HF, VHF or SATCOM voice; or Reykjavik Control on VHF. 4.5 When verifying a data link oceanic clearance via voice the following information must be provided: ETA for the OEP; The NAT track identifier (if operating on a NAT track); The cleared oceanic route (if operating on a random route); The cleared oceanic flight level (see paragraph 3.4); and The cleared Mach number. 5. Clearance Negotiation 5.1 When a data link oceanic clearance (CLX) is received, the crew may elect to send a new RCL message if the clearance is not acceptable. 5.2 If a revised clearance is issued then the new CLXs will be annotated RECLEARANCE 1, RECLEARANCE 2 etc. 5.3 The reclearance with the highest reclearance number shall be acknowledged. 6. Reclearances 6.1 The Reykjavik FDPS does not accept a new RCL once a CLA message has been received. Any subsequent request for a change to the oceanic clearance shall be made on voice to: Iceland Radio on HF, VHF or SATCOM voice; or Reykjavik Control on VHF. 7. Time Revisions 7.1 If the data link oceanic clearance has been received, crews should advise the current controller via voice if the ETA for the OEP changes by 3 minutes or more. This may result in ATC providing a reclearance. 7.2 The OEP estimate used by ATC when producing the oceanic clearance is located next to the OEP in the data link clearance message (see Section 10). This time should be used when considering whether a time revision notification to ATC is necessary. Crews should be aware that this time may not coincide with the OEP estimate they sent in the RCL. Reykjavik Data Link OCD Version 1 Page 7 of 11

8. RCL and CLA Errors Error Message ERROR IN MESSAGE REGISTRATION DOES NOT MATCH FLIGHT PLAN FLIGHT PLAN NOT HELD MULTIPLE FLIGHT PLAN HELD RCL RECEIVED TOO LATE CONTACT ICELAND RADIO ON VOICE FOR CLEARANCE REQUEST BEING PROCESSED AWAIT TRANSACTION COMPLETION INVALID FLIGHT PLAN STATUS RCL SENT TOO EARLY REQUEST AGAIN LATER SEND RCL WHEN 15 MINUTES FROM THE BOUNDARY RCL Errors Message Meaning and Crew Action Meaning: An error has been detected in the RCL received by the Reykjavik OCD system. Meaning: The aircraft registration in the RCL does not match the registration in the flight plan in the Reykjavik FDPS. Meaning: The Reykjavik FDPS does not have a flight plan for the flight. Crew action: Check that the correct callsign was used. Amend and re-request. Reykjavik Data Link OCD Version 1 Page 8 of 11 OR The oceanic clearance must be requested via voice (see paragraph 4.4). Meaning: The Reykjavik FDPS holds more than one flight plan for flight. Meaning: The clearance has already been sent to Iceland Radio for delivery on voice. Crew action: Contact Iceland Radio on voice for the clearance (see paragraph 4.4). Meaning: The crew has sent a new RCL while the previous one is still being processed by the Reykjavik FDPS. Crew action: Await clearance issued on the basis of the original RCL, then input new RCL if required. Meaning: The status of the flight plan in the Reykjavik FDPS is not appropriate for processing of an RCL message. Meaning: The flight plan has not yet been activated in the Reykjavik FDPS (see paragraphs 2.6-2.7). Crew action: Send the RCL when 15 minutes

from the Reykjavik CTA boundary. CLEARANCE CANCELLED TRANSACTION TIMED OUT Meaning: The transaction has timed out in the Reykjavik FDPS. CLA Errors Error Message CLA REJECTED CLEARANCE CANCELLED CLA REJECTED REGISTRATION DOES NOT MATCH FLIGHT PLAN CLA REJECTED CLEARANCE CANCELLED TRANSACTION TIMED OUT Message Meaning and Crew Action Meaning: The CLA received by the Reykjavik OCD system did not match the data link oceanic clearance or an error has been detected in the CLA. Crew action: The data link oceanic clearance received by the crew is not valid. The oceanic clearance must be requested via voice (see paragraph 4.4). Meaning: The aircraft registration in the CLA does not match the registration in the flight plan in the Reykjavik FDPS. Meaning: The transaction has timed out in the Reykjavik FDPS before the CLA was received. 9. Terms Used in the ATC/ Line LEVEL CHANGE The flight level in the clearance is different from the flight level requested in the RCL message. MACH CHANGE ENTRY POINT CHANGE <position> ROUTE AMENDMENT CLEARANCE LIMIT The speed in the clearance is different from the speed requested in the RCL message. The entry point in the clearance is different from the entry point requested in the RCL message. The route in the clearance is different from the route in the flight plan. The clearance limit in the clearance is different from the destination in the flight plan. Reykjavik Data Link OCD Version 1 Page 9 of 11

10. Explanation of Data Link Clearance Elements Message identifier Time and date (2010, June 03) Reykjavik OAC Data link clearance sequence number CLX 1259 100603 BIRD CLRNCE 026 Callsign Destination and Oceanic Entry Point SAS903 CLRD TO KEWR VIA ISVIG The route is not a NAT track RANDOM ROUTE Cleared route 63N010W 63N020W 63N030W 62N040W 60N050W PRAWN YDP FM ISVIG/1314 MNTN F360 M082 Cleared Mach number END OF MESSAGE Cleared oceanic flight level (see paragraph 3.4) If this line does not appear, the clearance may be incomplete (see paragraph 3.7) Estimate for Oceanic Entry Point used by ATC when assigning the clearance. Note: This element is not a restriction or an instruction (see section 7) CLX 1259 100603 BIRD CLRNCE 026 UAL941 CLRD TO KORD VIA BARKU NAT Track identifier NAT A BARKU RATSU 62N020W 63N030W 62N040W 60N050W PRAWN YDP FM BARKU/1314 MNTN F340 M082 ATC/LEVEL CHANGE END OF MESSAGE An ATC comment indicates that the clearance is different from what was requested in the RCL or FPL. Reykjavik Data Link OCD Version 1 Page 10 of 11

ATC CLRD CLRNCE CLX F FM M MNTN NAT Abbreviations used in data link oceanic clearance messages Air Traffic Control Cleared Clearance Clearance uplink message Flight level From Mach Maintain North Atlantic Track - END - Reykjavik Data Link OCD Version 1 Page 11 of 11