Appendix C AIRPORT LAYOUT PLANS

Similar documents
Chapter Six ALP Drawings. Tacoma Narrows Airport. Master Plan Update

DRAFT MASTER PLAN UPDATE

Airport Obstruction Standards

SITE ELEVATION AMSL...Ground Elevation in feet AMSL STRUCTURE HEIGHT...Height Above Ground Level OVERALL HEIGHT AMSL...Total Overall Height AMSL

Overview ICAO Standards and Recommended Practices for Aerodrome Safeguarding

The following criteria shall be applied within the boundaries of the AO District:

AIRSPACE PROTECTION. Guidance and considerations for development in the vicinity of Ohio s airports and heliports

ORDINANCE NO. _2013-

Part 77 and Construction

AERONAUTICAL SURVEYS & INSTRUMENT FLIGHT PROCEDURES

AVIATION PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT Oakland International Airport 530 Water Street Oakland, CA 94607

Consideration will be given to other methods of compliance which may be presented to the Authority.

Chapter 9 - AIRPORT SYSTEM DESIGN

NOTICE TO PROPOSED CITY PERMITS: ZONING HEIGHT RESTRICTIONS/APPROVAL PROCESS

APPENDIX D FEDERAL AVIATION REGULATIONS, PART 77

FACILITY REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY OF KEY ISSUES OVERVIEW

Chapter 4 Airport Facility Requirements

ARTICLE 34 AIRPORT HEIGHT COMBINING ZONE (AH) (Amended by Ordinance #295 Effective June 26, 2009)

STAFF REPORT. Airport Land Use Plan Consistency Review: Old Town Village Mixed Use Project City of Goleta. MEETING DATE: June 18, 2015 AGENDA ITEM: 5M

Table of Contents. List of Tables. Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky International Airport 2035 Master Plan Update

1) Rescind the MOD (must meet the standard); 2) Issue a new MOD which reaffirms the intent of the previous MOD; 3) Issue a new MOD with revisions.

Source: Chippewa Valley Regional Airport ASOS, Period of Record

TECHNICAL REPORT #7 Palm Beach International Airport Airport Layout Plan

Airport Master Plan Update

Executive Summary. MASTER PLAN UPDATE Fort Collins-Loveland Municipal Airport

AIRSIDE CAPACITY AND FACILITY REQUIREMENTS

DEPARTMENT: CIVIL ENGINEERING SEMESTER: III SUBJECT CODE / Name: CE2303/ Railway, Airport and Harbors Engineering 2 MARK QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

Appendix B Ultimate Airport Capacity and Delay Simulation Modeling Analysis

DRAFT FINAL REPORT AIRPORT MASTER PLAN. Rifle Garfield County Airport Revised May 15, 2014

STAFF REPORT. Airport Land Use Consistency Determination Betteravia Plaza. MEETING DATE: January 21, 2016 AGENDA ITEM: 8D

AIR NAVIGATION ORDER

APPENDIX K LAND USE. Charles M. Schulz - Sonoma County Airport Draft Environmental Impact Report July 2011 K-1

STUDY OVERVIEW MASTER PLAN GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

AERODROME LICENCE APPLICATION PROCESS

Acronyms. Airport Layout Plan Report Appendix A A-1

Chapter 5 Airport Facility Requirements

Airport Background Data and Assumptions Report New Cuyama Airport. Santa Barbara County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan Update

STAFF REPORT. Airport Land Use Plan Consistency Review: Santa Barbara Airport Master Plan. MEETING DATE: November 19, 2015 AGENDA ITEM: 7D

Chapter 4 Airport Facility Requirements. Introduction

Airport Master Plan. Brookings Regional Airport. Runway Runway 17-35

City of Monett, Missouri. Pride and Progress. Airport Master Plan Update. for the Monett Municipal Airport

Learning More About: Protecting and Evaluating Airspace for Airports

EXHIBIT A. LOMPOC AIRPORT MASTER PLAN SCOPE OF WORK AIP Project #

FACILITY REQUIREMENTS 5.1 Introduction

Appendix K: MSP Class B Airspace

AIRPORT LAND USE COMPATILIBILTY AIRPORT LAND USE COMPATIBILIITY

Draft Palo Alto Airport Master Plan Report County of Santa Clara, California October 2005

SUBCHAPTER E AIRSPACE

B GEORGIA INFRASTRUCTURE REPORT CARD AVIATION RECOMMENDATIONS DEFINITION OF THE ISSUE. Plan and Fund for the Future:

Lake Tahoe Airport Master Plan Public Meeting March 16, 2015

Article 11 Airport District

Preferred Alternative Summary

ERIE INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT MASTER PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS

Windmills & Airspace Can We Work Together?

OVERVIEW BASIC DESIGN FACTORS. Demand Determinants

Chapter Seven COST ESTIMATES AND FUNDING A. GENERAL

FAA Requirements for Engine-out Procedures and Obstacle Clearance

OBSTACLE IDENTIFICATION SURFACE CALCULATION TOOL (OIS CT) FOR AIRPORT AIRSPACE OBSTRUCTION ANALYSES AT CIVIL AIRPORTS IN THE UNITED STATES

Merritt Island Airport

ICAO Standards. Airfield Information Signs. ICAO Annex 14, 4th Edition Aerodrome Design and Operations

Draft Concept Alternatives Analysis for the Inaugural Airport Program September 2005

TABLE OF CONTENTS. General Study Objectives Public Involvement Issues to Be Resolved

ADVISORY CIRCULAR ON CALCULATION OF DECLARED DISTANCES

AIRPORT MASTER PLAN FOR. charles B. WHEELER DOWNTOWN AIRPORT KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI

Table of Contents. Overview Objectives Key Issues Process...1-3

Prepared By: Mead & Hunt, Inc Port Lansing Road Lansing, MI 48906

1.0 Project Background Mission Statement and Goals Objectives of this Sustainable Master Plan

5.0 ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS

Draft Concept Alternatives Analysis for the Inaugural Airport Program September 2005

According to FAA Advisory Circular 150/5060-5, Airport Capacity and Delay, the elements that affect airfield capacity include:

Flying Cloud Airport (FCM) Zoning Process: Informing a Mn/DOT Path Forward

Airfield Design OVERVIEW BASIC DESIGN FACTORS. Airport Role

Public Review Draft South County Airport Master Plan Report. County of Santa Clara San Martin, California

APPENDIX F LAND USE PLANNING FOR AIRPORTS AND POCATELLO REGIONAL AIRPORT LAND USE COMPLIANCE

TECHNICAL REPORT #3 Palm Beach International Airport Demand/Capacity and Facility Requirements

APPENDIX F AIRSPACE INFORMATION

Appendix D Project Newsletters. Tacoma Narrows Airport. Master Plan Update

Study Committee Meeting. September 2015

Chapter 1 Introduction and Project Overview

AIRPORT COMPLIANCE th Texas Aviation Conference. 3/29/2018 Date. Footer Text

CLASS SPECIFICATION 5/12/11 SENIOR AIRPORT ENGINEER, CODE 7257

CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION

PLUME RISE ASSESSMENTS

II. Purpose and Need. 2.1 Background

-NOTE: NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION PURPOSES-

Chapter 4 Airport Facility Requirements

Effective Altitude. R-3103 To 30,000 (To 9,144 meters) Source: NACO 2002 Notes: 1 By NOTAM issued 12 hours in advance

Document prepared by MnDOT Office of Aeronautics and HNTB Corporation. MINNESOTA GO STATE AVIATION SYSTEM PLAN

Table of Contents. Master Plan March 2014 TOC i Spokane International Airport

FAA Update. Dakota-Minnesota (DMA) Airports District Office. Federal Aviation Administration. Presented to: By: Date: South Dakota Airports Conference

AIRPORT PLANNING, DEVELOPMENT AND LAND ACQUISITION

Addendum - Airport Development Alternatives (Chapter 6)

Draft Concept Alternatives Analysis for the Inaugural Airport Program September 2005

Aerodrome Obstacle Survey Information Checks

2015 PURDUE ROAD SCHOOL March 11, 2015

CHAPTER 3 ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED

RULES OF TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AERONAUTICS DIVISION CHAPTER LICENSING AND REGISTRATION OF AIRPORTS TABLE OF CONTENTS

GLOSSARY A.1 ABBREVIATIONS/ACRONYMS

1 DRAFT. General Aviation Terminal Services Aircraft Hangars Aircraft Parking Aprons Airport Support Facilities

General Aviation Land Use Planning

Transcription:

Appendix C AIRPORT LAYOUT PLANS

Appendix C AIRPORT LAYOUT PLANS Airport Master Plan Santa Barbara Airport As part of this Airport Master Plan, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) requires the development of several technical drawings detailing specific parts of the airport and its environs. The technical drawings are collectively referred to as the Airport Layout Plan (ALP) set. These drawings were created on a computer-aided drafting system (CAD) and serve as the official depiction of the current and planned condition of the Santa Barbara Airport (Airport). These drawings will be delivered to the FAA for their review and approval. The FAA will critique the drawings from a technical perspective to be sure all applicable federal regulations are met. The five primary functions of the ALP that define its purpose are: 1) An approved plan is necessary for the airport to receive financial assistance under the terms of the Airport and Airway Improvement Act of 1982 (AIP), as amended, and to be able to receive specific Passenger Facility Charge funding. An airport must keep its ALP current and follow that plan, since those are grant assurance requirements of the AIP and previous airport development programs, including the 1970 Airport Development Aid Program (ADAP) and Federal Aid Airports Program (FAAP) of 1946, as amended. While ALPs are not required for airports other than those developed with assistance under the aforementioned federal programs, the same guidance can be applied to all airports. 2) An ALP creates a blueprint for airport development by depicting proposed facility improvements. The ALP provides a guideline by which the airport sponsor can ensure that development maintains airport design standards and safety requirements and is consistent with airport and community land use plans. C-1 DRAFT FINAL

3) The ALP is a public document that serves as a record of aeronautical requirements, both present and future, and as a reference for community deliberations on land use proposals and budget resource planning. 4) The approved ALP enables the airport sponsor and the FAA to plan for facility improvements at the airport. It also allows the FAA to anticipate budgetary and procedural needs. The approved ALP will also allow the FAA to protect the airspace required for facility or approach procedure improvements. 5) The ALP can be a working tool for the airport sponsor, including its development and maintenance staff. It should be noted that the FAA requires that any planned changes to the airfield (i.e., runway and taxiway system, etc.) be represented on the drawings. A landside configuration is also depicted on the drawings, but the FAA recognized that landside development is much more fluid and often dependent upon specific developer needs. Thus, an updated drawing set is not typically necessary for future landside alterations provided they do not impact planned airside facilities and land use designations. AIRPORT LAYOUT PLAN SET The ALP set includes several technical drawings which depict various aspects of the current and future layout of the airport. An official ALP set has been developed for Santa Barbara Airport, a draft of which is included in this appendix. The following is a description of the ALP drawings included with this Airport Master Plan. AIRPORT DATA The Airport Data sheet contains detailed information as it relates to the existing and ultimate condition of the airport including runway end coordinates, wind rose graphics, and the full runway and airport data tables, which include specific FAA airfield design standard dimensions. AIRPORT LAYOUT PLAN The ALP drawing graphically presents the existing and ultimate airport layout plan. The ALP drawing includes such elements as the physical airport features, wind data tabulation, location of airfield facilities (i.e., runways, taxiways, navigational aids), and existing landside facilities (terminal, ramps, general aviation facilities, hangars). Also presented on the ALP are the runway safety areas, airport property boundary, and landside facility layouts. The computerized plan provides detailed information on existing and future facility layouts on multiple layers that permit the user to focus on any section of the airport at a desired scale. The plan can be used as base information for design and can be easily updated in the C-2 DRAFT FINAL

future to reflect new development and more detail concerning existing conditions as made available through design surveys. NORTH AND SOUTH TERMINAL AREA DRAWINGS Terminal area drawings consist of a large-scale depiction of areas with significant terminal facility development. In this case, the North Terminal Area drawing depicts the planned consolidated general aviation area and the South Terminal Area drawing depicts the passenger terminal building and its support facilities. AIRPORT AIRSPACE DRAWINGS Federal Aviation Regulation (F.A.R.) Part 77, Objects Affecting Navigable Airspace, was established for use by local authorities to control the height of objects near airports. The FAR Part 77 Airspace Drawings included in this Airport Master Plan are graphic depictions of this regulatory criterion. The FAR Part 77 Airspace Drawings are a tool to aid local authorities in determining if proposed development could present a hazard to aircraft using the airport. The FAR Part 77 Airspace Drawings can be a critical tool for the airport sponsor s use in reviewing proposed development in the vicinity of the Airport. Airport sponsors should do all in their power to ensure development stays below the FAR Part 77 surfaces to protect the role of the Airport. The following discussion will describe those surfaces that make up the recommended FAR Part 77 surfaces at Santa Barbara Airport. The FAR Part 77 Airspace Drawings assign three-dimensional imaginary surfaces associated with the Airport. These imaginary surfaces emanate from the runway centerlines and are dimensioned according to the visibility minimums associated with the approach to the runway ends and size of aircraft to operate on each runway. The FAR Part 77 imaginary surfaces include the primary surface, approach surface, transitional surface, horizontal surface, and conical surface. Each surface is described as follows. Primary Surface The primary surface is longitudinally centered on the runway and extends 200 feet beyond each runway end. The elevation of any point on the primary surface is the same as the elevation along the nearest associated point on the runway centerline. The primary surface for Runway 7-25 is 1,000 feet wide, Runway 15L-33R is 250 feet wide, and Runway 15R- 33L is 500 feet wide centered on the runway. C-3 DRAFT FINAL

Approach Surface An approach surface is also established for each runway end. The approach surface begins at the end of the primary surface, extends upward and outward, and is centered along an extended runway centerline. The approach surface leading to each runway is based upon the type of approach available (instrument or visual) or planned. The approach surface for Runway 7 extends a horizontal distance of 10,000 feet at a 50:1 slope with an additional 40,000 feet at a slope of 40:1. The outer width of the approach surface is 16,000 feet. The approach surface for Runway 25 extends a horizontal distance of 10,000 feet at a 34:1 slope with an outer width of 4,000 feet. The approach surface for Runway 15R-33L extends a horizontal distance of 5,000 feet at a 20:1 slope with an outer width of 1,500 feet. The approach surface for Runway 15L-33R extends a horizontal distance of 5,000 feet at a 20:1 slope with an outer width of 1,250 feet. Transitional Surface Each runway has a transitional surface that begins at the outside edge of the primary surface at the same elevation as the runway. The surface rises at a slope of 7:1, up to a height 150 feet above the highest runway elevation. At that point, the transitional surface ends and the horizontal surface begins. Horizontal Surface The horizontal surface is established at 150 feet above the highest elevation of the runway surface. Having no slope, the horizontal surface connects the transitional and approach surfaces to the conical surface at a distance of 10,000 feet from the end of the primary surfaces of each runway. Conical Surface The conical surface begins at the outer edge of the horizontal surface. The conical surface then continues for an additional 4,000 feet horizontally at a slope of 20:1. Therefore, at 4,000 feet from the horizontal surface, the elevation of the conical surface is 350 feet above the highest airport elevation. APPROACH SURFACE PROFILE DRAWINGS The runway profile drawing presents the entirety of the FAR Part 77 approach surface to the runway ends. It also depicts the runway centerline profile with elevations. These drawings provide profile details that the Airspace Drawing does not. C-4 DRAFT FINAL

The approach surface profile drawings include identified penetrations to the approach surface. Penetrations to the approach surface are considered obstructions. The FAA will determine if any obstructions are also hazards which require mitigation. The FAA utilizes other design criteria such as the threshold siting surface (TSS) and various surfaces defined in FAA Order 8260.3B, Terminal Instrument Procedures (TERPS), to determine if an obstruction is a hazard. If an obstruction is a hazard, the FAA can take many steps to protect air navigation. The mitigation options range from removing the hazard to installing obstruction lighting to adjusting the instrument approach minimums. AIRPORT LAND USE DRAWING The objective of the Airport Land Use Drawing is to coordinate uses of the Airport property in a manner compatible with the functional design of the airport facility. Airport land use planning is important for orderly development and efficient use of available space. There are two primary considerations for airport land use planning. These are to secure those areas essential to the safe and efficient operation of the airport and to determine compatible land uses for the balance of the property which would be most advantageous to the airport and community. In the development of an airport land use plan for Santa Barbara Airport, the airport property was broken into several large general tracts. Each tract was analyzed for specific site characteristics, such as tract size and shape, land characteristics, and existing land uses. The availability of utilities and the accessibility to various transportation modes were also considered. Limitations and constraints to development, such as height and noise restrictions and contiguous land uses, were analyzed next. Finally, the compatibility of various land uses in each tract was analyzed. The depiction of on-airport land uses on this drawing becomes the official FAA acceptance of current and future land uses. There are six different land uses identified for Santa Barbara Airport: Airfield Operations, Airport Facilities, Goleta Slough Reserve, Airport Industrial, Commercial Recreation, and Airport Commercial. INNER-TRANSITIONAL OBSTACLE FREE ZONE (OFZ) DRAWING The OFZ protects the transition of aircraft to and from the runway. The inner-transitional OFZ is a defined volume of airspace along the sides of the runway OFZ and inner-approach OFZ. The inner-transitional OFZ applies only to runways with lower than ¾-mile approach visibility minimums; therefore, this drawing was prepared only for Runway 7-25. Within this area, aircraft are precluded from taxiing and parking, and object penetrations are not allowed except for frangible NAVAID equipment that is fixed by function. C-5 DRAFT FINAL

DEPARTURE SURFACE DRAWING For runways supporting instrument operations, a separate drawing depicting the departure surface is required. The departure surface, when clear, allows pilots to follow standard departure procedures. The departure surface emanates from the departure end of the runway to a distance of 10,200 feet. The inner width is 1,000 feet and the outer width is 6,466 feet. The slope of the departure surface is 40:1. Obstacles frequently penetrate the departure surface. Where object penetrations exist, the departure procedure can be adjusted by: a) Non-standard climb rates, and/or b) Non-standard (higher) departure minimums. Therefore, it is important for the airport sponsor to identify and remove departure surface obstacles whenever possible in order to enhance takeoff operations at the airport. The airport sponsor should also prevent any new obstacles from developing. ALP SET DISCLAIMER The preparation of the ALP set has been supported, in part, through financial assistance from the FAA through the Airport Improvement Program (AIP). The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policy of the United States or FAA. Acceptance of the airport master plan does not in any way constitute a commitment on the part of the United States or FAA to participate in any development depicted on the ALP drawing, nor does it indicate that the proposed development is environmentally acceptable or would have justification in accordance with appropriate public laws. C-6 DRAFT FINAL