Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport Monthly Runway Use System Report. June 2015

Similar documents
Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport Monthly Runway Use System Report. June 2016

PLAN Anoka County - Blaine Airport

STUDY OF RUNWAY 12L AND 12R ARRIVAL OPERATIONS. September 2016

Noise Oversight Committee

Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport (MSP)

Changing runways at Sydney Airport to share the noise

MINNEAPOLIS-ST. PAUL PUBLIC INPUT MEETING 3 RD QUARTER 2016 INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT (MSP)

National Transportation Safety Board Recommendation and FAA Air Traffic Orders

Reliever Airports: NOISE ABATEMENT PLAN Flying Cloud Airport (FCM)

O Hare Noise Compatibility Commission Technical Committee April 19, Proposed Interim Fly Quiet Runway Rotation Plan

Washington Dulles International Airport (IAD) Aircraft Noise Contour Map Update

Study of Airport Winds and Aircraft Noise Complaints. January 2016

St. Paul Downtown Airport (STP)

Technical Report. Aircraft Noise Analysis. Portola Valley and Woodside, California. July Prepared by: Aircraft Noise Abatement Office

AIRPORT MASTER PLAN FOR. charles B. WHEELER DOWNTOWN AIRPORT KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI

Appendix C AIRPORT LAYOUT PLANS

NOISE ABATEMENT PLAN. St. Paul Downtown Airport Holman Field

2013 Airport Noise Plan of Action

According to FAA Advisory Circular 150/5060-5, Airport Capacity and Delay, the elements that affect airfield capacity include:

UPDATE ON THE 6 IDEAS (1-4) NAV CANADA

AIRPORTS There are two types of airport environments: controlled and uncontrolled. A controlled airport has an operating control tower, staffed by

Appendix B Ultimate Airport Capacity and Delay Simulation Modeling Analysis

FRENCH VALLEY AIRPORT (F70) Sky Canyon Dr. Murrieta, CA. Phone: Riverside FAA FSDO Complaint Line: (951)

RTIA Runway Utilization Discussion Paper

FACILITY REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY OF KEY ISSUES OVERVIEW

NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE January 16, Audio recordings are made of this meeting

AERONAUTICAL SURVEYS & INSTRUMENT FLIGHT PROCEDURES

ICAO Standards. Airfield Information Signs. ICAO Annex 14, 4th Edition Aerodrome Design and Operations

S p NA, illil MINNEAPOLIS- ST. PAUL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT ( MSP) NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE ( NOC) RESOLUTION #

Portable Noise Monitor Report

Table of Contents. Overview Objectives Key Issues Process...1-3

RED ATLAS PRODUCT BROCHURE. From Nevalee Business Solutions

PUBLIC INPUT MEETING COMMENTS/RESPONSES LOCATION: METROPOLITAN AIRPORTS COMMISSION GENERAL OFFICES 28 JULY 2015

Turn before Runway End

2. 1:45 to 1:50 Review and Approval of November 18, 2009 NOC Meeting Minutes

1.1.3 Taxiways. Figure 1-15: Taxiway Data. DRAFT Inventory TYPICAL PAVEMENT CROSS-SECTION LIGHTING TYPE LENGTH (FEET) WIDTH (FEET) LIGHTING CONDITION

6.C.1 AIRPORT NOISE. Noise Analysis and Land Use Impact Assessment FORT LAUDERDALE-HOLLYWOOD INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT

Hartford-Brainard Airport Potential Runway Closure White Paper

Summary of Committee Discussion/Questions Metropolitan Transportation Services Senior Planner Russ Owen presented this item.

KSMO HIGH. Santa Monica Muni Airport Santa Monica, California, United States

PART 210 NOISE ABATEMENT AND RUNWAY PROCEDURES NOISE ABATEMENT AND PREFERENTIAL RUNWAY USE PROCEDURES

Portable Noise Monitor Report

Community Noise Consortium Meeting (CNC)

ACTION TRANSMITTAL

Airport Engineering Lectures

Defining and Managing capacities Brian Flynn, EUROCONTROL

Thursday, May 2 nd, 2013 South St. Paul Municipal Airport Meeting Room 4:00 p.m. 5:30 p.m. MEETING NOTES

Portable Noise Monitor Report

KSBP HIGH. San Luis County Rgnl Airport San Luis Obispo, California, United States

The purpose of this Demand/Capacity. The airfield configuration for SPG. Methods for determining airport AIRPORT DEMAND CAPACITY. Runway Configuration

Boston Logan International Airport Operational Overview

Portable Noise Monitor Report

Pacifica. Short Term Aircraft Noise Monitoring

East Hampton Airport (KHTO) Noise Abatement Plan 2016 Prepared by the Eastern Region Helicopter Council

POST-IMPLEMENTATION COMMUNITY IMPACT REVIEW

Technical Report. Aircraft Overflight and Noise Analysis. Brisbane, California. December Prepared by:

CHAPTER 4 DEMAND/CAPACITY ANALYSIS

AIRCRAFT NOISE INFORMATION PACK: CANNING VALE

INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW. Boston-Logan Runway 4 Left Area Navigation (RNAV) Visual Flight Procedure Test

Portable Noise Monitor Report

APPENDIX H 2022 BASELINE NOISE EXPOSURE CONTOUR

SUN Users Chris Pomeroy, Airport Manager SUN Air Traffic Procedures 2017/2018 Winter Ski Season

GENERAL INFORMATION The aerodrome consists of three runways (04L-22R, 04R-22L, 12-30) and four aprons.

RSAT RUNUP ANALYSIS 1. INTRODUCTION 2. METHODOLOGY

Airport Master Plan. Brookings Regional Airport. Runway Runway 17-35

REVIEW OF GOLD COAST AIRPORT Noise Abatement Procedures

Executive Summary. MASTER PLAN UPDATE Fort Collins-Loveland Municipal Airport

Updates to Procedures at St. John s International Airport

Windmills & Airspace Can We Work Together?

Noise Programs & NextGen Briefing. Stan Shepherd, Manager Airport Noise Programs

Raleigh-Durham International Airport Airport Capacity Enhancement Plan. August 1991

Noise Oversight Committee

EFFECTIVE NOTAM KGON 10/06 SPECIAL FLIGHT PROCEDURES GROTON, CT

Agenda: SASP SAC Meeting 3

Appendix A. Meeting Coordination. Appendix A

CATCODE ] CATCODE

APPENDIX D MSP Airfield Simulation Analysis

This section sets forth all Los Angeles World Airports (LAWA) noise abatement procedures, restrictions, and regulations involving aircraft operations.

Master Plan Update Technical Advisory Committee Meeting

Appendix K: MSP Class B Airspace

Austin-Bergstrom International Airport Master Plan Update

Chapter III - Demand/Capacity and Facility Requirements

Key Purpose & Need Issues

Guidance for Complexity and Density Considerations - in the New Zealand Flight Information Region (NZZC FIR)

Portable Noise Monitor Report

Flying Cloud Airport Joint Airport Zoning Board. 27 February 2018 Public Hearing #1 Overview of Proposed Airport Zoning Ordinance

1.0 Project Background Mission Statement and Goals Objectives of this Sustainable Master Plan

Partnership for AiR Transportation Noise and Emissions Reduction. MIT Lincoln Laboratory

Mountain / Canyon Flying LLC TAILWHEEL ENDORSEMENT SYLLABUS

KTPF PETER O. KNIGHT AIRPORT TAMPA, FL 10/27 NOTAM SPECIAL FLIGHT PROCEDURES EFFECTIVE

msp macnoise.com MSP Noise Oversight Committee (NOC) November 17, 2010

1. Air Traffic Statistics Suvarnabhumi Airport: Monday, 11 Sunday, 17 June Actual Daily Traffic & Runway Utilization. (Wed) 13 Jun.

Part 150 Update Status and Recommendation

MetroAir Virtual Airlines

Preferred Alternative Summary

Massport and FAA RNAV Pilot Study Overview Briefing to Massport CAC. December 8, 2016

Chapter 3. Demand/Capacity & Facility Requirements

KHND MEDIUM. Henderson Executive Airport Las Vegas, Nevada, United States. Diagram #1: Airport Map All Aircraft Categories / All Runways

BUSINESS OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MERCER ISLAND, WA

Draft Concept Alternatives Analysis for the Inaugural Airport Program September 2005

Transcription:

Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport Monthly Runway Use System Report June 2015 Environment Department, Noise Program Office Metropolitan Airports Commission 6040 28th Avenue South, Minneapolis, MN 55450 MetroAirports.org This report is for informational purposes only and cannot be used for enforcement purposes

Runway Use System Report - June 2015 Selecting which runways to use for aircraft departures and arrivals at Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport (MSP) is a complex task. Decisions about airport configuration and runway use at MSP are made carefully on a continuous basis by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Air Traffic Control (ATC). ATC takes into consideration numerous factors, including: safety, efficiency, wind direction and wind speed (on the surface and aloft), air traffic demand, aircraft weight, the number of inbound and scheduled outbound aircraft, noise abatement, and many other variables when selecting an airport configuration. At MSP the most frequently used runways are the parallel runways, Runway 12R-30L and Runway 12L-30R. These runways are used every day unless construction or unusual meteorological conditions do not allow their use. Runway 17 is used for departures in a southerly direction. Runway 35 is used for arrivals from the south. Runway 4-22 is used for arrivals and/or departures of heavy aircraft that require longer runway distances for landings or takeoffs. The Runway Use System (RUS) prioritizes arrival and departure runways to promote flight activity over lesspopulated residential areas as much as possible. Figure A MSP Airport Layout and Runway Use System 2

Departure Prioritization (see green arrows depicted on Figure A): 1. Runways 12L and 12R (parallel runways) are the first priority for departures since aircraft overfly industrial use areas to the southeast immediately after takeoff from MSP. These runways are used when wind speed and direction promote a south flow at MSP. In addition, there are times when these runways are used if winds are light enough, regardless of the wind direction, and when airspace demand is light enough to allow discretion in runway configuration. 2. Runway 17 is used for departures to the south to augment the flow of air traffic using the parallel runways, and when wind speed and direction promote a south flow at MSP. 3. Balanced Use of Runway 4-22 occurs when strong northeasterly or southwesterly winds (crosswinds) prevent use of the parallel runways, or when an aircraft requires a longer runway for takeoff. 4. Runways 30L and 30R (parallel runways) are the lowest priority for departures since aircraft consequently take off to the northwest over densely-populated residential areas. These runways are used during heavy air traffic demand periods and when wind conditions and other factors do not allow use of Runways 12L and 12R. Arrival Prioritization (see red arrows depicted on Figure A): 1. Runways 30L and 30R (parallel runways) are the first priority for arrivals since aircraft approach MSP from the southeast over industrial use areas. These runways are used when flight factors promote a north flow at MSP and during heavy air traffic demand periods. 2. Runway 35 is used for arrivals from the south when wind speed and direction promote a north flow at MSP and during peak air traffic periods to augment the use of the parallel runways. 3. Balanced Use of Runway 4-22 occurs when strong northeasterly or southwesterly crosswinds prevent use of the parallel runways, or when an aircraft requires a longer runway for landing. 4. Runways 12L and 12R are the lowest priority for arrivals from the northwest since aircraft approach MSP over densely-populated residential areas. These runways are used when wind speed and direction promote a south flow at MSP. Five primary airport runway configuration options exist at MSP: north-flow, south-flow, opposite-direction, and two mixed flows. A north-flow configuration offers three runways for arriving aircraft, which makes it the most efficient, due to the airspace requirements of arriving aircraft. During a north-flow configuration (N) aircraft arrivals are on Runways 30L, 30R and 35 and departures are on Runways 30L and 30R, as shown in Figure B. There are times when the wind characteristics do not allow for arrivals on Runway 35 during a north-flow configuration. This results in all arrivals and departures on Runways 30L and 30R. For the purposes of this report, this configuration is denoted as straight north-flow (N*), as shown in Figure C. Figure B North-Flow (N) Figure C Straight North-Flow (N*) 3

During a south-flow configuration aircraft arrivals are on Runways 12L and 12R and departures are on Runways 12L, 12R and 17, as shown in Figure D. Conversely to the north-flow configuration, the south-flow configuration (S) offers three departure runways. There are times when the wind characteristics do not allow for departures on Runway 17 during a south-flow configuration. This results in all aircraft arrivals and departures on Runways 12L and 12R. For the purposes of this report, this configuration is denoted as straight south-flow (S*), as shown in Figure E. Figure D South-Flow (S) Figure E Straight South-Flow (S*) As part of the RUS, head-to-head, or opposite-direction operations (O), are sometimes conducted to the southeast of MSP. This configuration, shown in Figure D, utilizes the most preferred arrival and departure runways according to the RUS; however, it requires at least 15 miles of separation between arrival and departure operations and can be used only during low aircraft traffic demand periods with light winds present. Figure D Opposite Direction (O) 4

According to the FAA, mixed-flow configurations that maximize the RUS are most feasible during nighttime and during transitions into, and out of, high aircraft traffic demand periods. These transitions typically occur between 6:00 a.m. and 7:30 a.m. and 9:00 p.m. and 10:30 p.m. One example of a mixed flow configuration (MA) is where aircraft arrive on Runways 30L and 30R and depart on Runway 17 with reduced departure operations on Runways 30L and 30R, as shown in Figure E. In another mixed flow configuration (MB) aircraft arrivals occur on Runway 35 with departures on Runways 12L and 12R, as shown in Figure F. Figure E Mixed Flow A (MA) Figure F Mixed Flow B (MB) A summary of runway use for May 2015 is provided in Table 1 for total operations, nighttime operations, and the morning transition and evening transition periods; these transition periods provide the greatest opportunity for ATC to utilize the most beneficial aspects of the RUS for noise mitigation when wind conditions and other factors allow. 5

Figure G Airport Layout Table 1 Summary of Runway Use: June 2015 RWY Arrival/ Departure Total Operations Count Nighttime Count (10:30 p.m. - 6:00 a.m.) Morning Transition Count (6:00 a.m. - 7:30 a.m.) Evening Transition Count (9:00 p.m. - 10:30 p.m.) Total Operations Percent Nighttime Percent (10:30 p.m. - 6:00 a.m.) Morning Transition Percent (6:00 a.m. - 7:30 a.m.) Evening Transition Percent (9:00 p.m. - 10:30 p.m.) 4 Arrivals 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 12L Arrivals 3,765 481 71 117 21.16% 2.70% 0.40% 0.66% 12R Arrivals 3,819 217 65 165 21.46% 1.22% 0.37% 0.93% 17 Arrivals 1 0 0 0 0.01% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 22 Arrivals 2 2 0 0 0.01% 0.01% 0.00% 0.00% 30L Arrivals 3,194 224 110 201 17.95% 1.26% 0.62% 1.13% 30R Arrivals 3,769 508 101 156 21.18% 2.85% 0.57% 0.88% 35 Arrivals 3,244 103 22 40 18.23% 0.58% 0.12% 0.22% Total Monthly Arrivals 17,794 1,535 369 679 100.00% 8.63% 2.07% 3.82% 4 Departures 6 1 2 0 0.03% 0.01% 0.01% 0.00% 12L Departures 2,640 146 195 269 14.87% 0.82% 1.10% 1.52% 12R Departures 1,226 82 229 234 6.91% 0.46% 1.29% 1.32% 17 Departures 4,148 59 278 15 23.37% 0.33% 1.57% 0.08% 22 Departures 9 1 1 1 0.05% 0.01% 0.01% 0.01% 30L Departures 5,189 54 397 327 29.24% 0.30% 2.24% 1.84% 30R Departures 4,517 119 437 291 25.45% 0.67% 2.46% 1.64% 35 Departures 13 13 0 0 0.07% 0.07% 0% 0.00% Total Monthly Departures Total Monthly Operations 17,748 475 1,539 1,137 100.00% 2.68% 8.67% 6.41% 35,542 2,010 1,908 1,816 6

The purpose of the RUS is to establish priorities of arrival and departure runways to promote flights over lesspopulated areas. According to the RUS, the arrival runway priorities are Runways 30L, 30R and 35 and the departure runway priorities are Runways 12R, 12L and 17. A monthly summary of the activity on the RUS highpriority runways is provided in Table 2. Table 2 Use of RUS High-Priority Runways: June 2015 Count Percent Use of RUS High-Priority Runways 18,221 51.27% Arrivals 30L, 30R, 35 10,207 28.72% Departures 12L, 12R, 17 8,014 22.55% Total Monthly Operations 35,542 100.00% The appendix contains an hourly breakout of airport operations, airport runway configuration changes, surface winds and winds aloft information by day. Airport traffic demand levels, surface winds and winds aloft are the greatest determining factors in runway configuration at MSP. When the traffic demand and wind conditions are not determining factors, ATC has more discretion in determining the runway configuration and, therefore, a greater opportunity to utilize the RUS. In addition to the significant issues of airport traffic demand levels and wind conditions, there are a number of variables that may affect the runway configuration. These include, among others: aircraft separation minimums, runway conditions and closures, meteorological conditions, visibility, navigational equipment maintenance, aircraft emergencies, pilot requests, aircraft weight and performance characteristics and aircraft de-icing activity. The individual and cumulative synergistic effects of these variables add significant complexity to the airport runway use configuration at MSP at any given time. 7

Appendix Hourly Breakout of Airport Operations and Weather by Day June 2015 8