BEACON LINE RAIL TRAIL BREWSTER TO HOPEWELL JUNCTION

Similar documents
Appendix 3. Greenway Design Standards. The Whitemarsh Township Greenway Plan

Hudson Highlands Fjord Trail Draft Master Plan. April 29, 2015

Auburn Trail / Ontario Pathways Trail Connector Feasibility Study Public Information Meeting Wednesday, August 22, 2012

2. Goals and Policies. The following are the adopted Parks and Trails Goals for Stillwater Township:

FEASIBILITY CRITERIA

ANCLOTE COASTAL TRAIL ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS STUDY

Georgetown-Lewes Rail/Trail Study. Rail/Trail Study: Cool Spring to Cape Henlopen State Park New Road Extension (House Resolution No.

Understanding user expectations And planning for long term sustainability 1

City of Durango 5.8 FUNDING TRAILS DEVELOPMENT

Trail # NW Tuesday, June DESIGN. Provide an Review the Provide an. Project Goals: System system. wayfinding

Citrus Heights Creek Corridor Trail Project Trail Advisory Group Field Trip #2 September 11, :00 11:00 am Trellis Hall, Citrus Heights

AGENDA ITEM 5 D WAKULLA ENVIRONMENTAL INSTITUTE (WEI) TRAIL FEASIBILITY STUDY

At the time, the portion of the line through Eagle County remains wholly under the ownership of Union Pacific Railroad (UP).

Trail Feasibility Study

The Baker/Carver Regional Trail is intended to

METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 390 North Robert Street, St. Paul, MN Phone (651) TDD (651)

Addendum - Airport Development Alternatives (Chapter 6)

Blue River Trail Master Plan JSA to Town Hall June 2004

Longmont to Boulder Regional Trail Jay Road Connection DRAFT FINAL REPORT

2016 Regional Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) Grant Application

MORGAN CREEK GREENWAY Final Report APPENDICES

Railroad Safety Trail

DRAFT - APRIL 13, 2007 ROUTING STUDY FOR TRAIL CONNECTIONS BETWEEN CALAIS AND AYERS JUNCTION

Coast to Coast Connector Summit

Blueways: Rivers, lakes, or streams with public access for recreation that includes fishing, nature observation, and opportunities for boating.

ALBANY-HUDSON ELECTRIC TRAIL FEASIBILITY STUDY. Final Report OCTOBER 2011

China Creek North Park Upgrades and Glen Pump Station. Park Board Committee Meeting Monday, July 10, 2017

EAST DON TRAIL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT. Community Liaison Committee Meeting #3 July 15, :30 to 8:30 pm Flemingdon Park Library

Tallahassee-St. Marks Historic Railroad Trail

Chapter 4.0 Alternatives Analysis

Chapter 6: POLICY AND PROCEDURE RECOMMENDATIONS

Northaven Trail Phase 2 Initial Project Overview

Business Item No

DATE: 23 March, 2011 TO: Communities FROM: BlazeSports America. RE: Accessible Trails Checklist 1

Mason Street Bike/Pedestrian Trail Project

Little River Trail Feasibility Study

3. COLTA / HUGA CONNECTIONS - PRELIMINARY

4. Safety Concerns Potential Short and Medium-Term Improvements

Welcome to the Cross County Trail Public Input Session!

Segment 2: La Crescent to Miller s Corner

Hospital Link Project Project Update Winter 2018

Lake Windermere Westside Legacy Trail. A multi-use non-motorized paved trail promoting health, wealth and outdoor appreciation

Regional Wayfinding Sign Strategy Thurston County Trails 2017

Gardner: overview. Santa Fe, Oregon, and California National Historic Trails UNINCORPORATED JOHNSON COUNTY OLATHE UNINCORPORATED JOHNSON COUNTY

OPEN HOUSE PRESENTATION

Business Item No XXX. Proposed Action That the Metropolitan Council approve the Coon Creek Regional Trail Master Plan.

Committee Report. Community Development Committee For the Metropolitan Council meeting of April 13, Business Item No.

A CASE FOR COMPLETING THE JORDAN RIVER PARKWAY: A

Section II. Planning & Public Process Planning for the Baker/Carver Regional Trail began in 2010 as a City of Minnetrista initiative.

Lafourche Parish Government REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS. Landscape Architectural Services

Non-motorized Trail Plan & Proposal. August 8, 2014

I. INTRODUCTION EAST COAST GREENWAY STUDY PURPOSE

Appendix E: Railroad Route Evaluation, Maps and Tables

WELCOME to the Iditarod Dog Sledding Historic District (IDSHD) Workshop. January 11, Houston Middle School Houston, Alaska

Agenda Report. Spruce Street Outlet Drainage Improvements Tower Road Relief Sewer

Lincoln Village Pedestrian Bicycle Bridge Community Meeting September 13th, 2016

Lake Erie Commerce Center Traffic Analysis

Becker County Trail Routing Feasibility Study

Committee Report. Community Development Committee For the Metropolitan Council meeting of August 12, Business Item No.

FINCH HYDRO CORRIDOR TRAIL PROJECT

CHAPTER 4 -- THE LAND USE PLAN: DESCRIPTIONS AND POLICIES FOR THIRTEEN PLANNING AREAS

Committee. Presentation Outline

MEETING MINUTES District 1 Trail Planning Meeting 1

ROAD AND TRAIL PROJECT APPROVAL

URBAN DESIGN REPORT. Proposed Residential Development, Old Church Road, Caledon East

Electric System Serving Pierce County Current system and future investments

CHAPTER III: TRAIL DESIGN STANDARDS, SPECIFICATIONS & PERMITS

Non-Motorized Transportation

MPRB: Southwest LRT Community Advisory Committee Issues and Outcomes by Location Current to: 12 November 2010

Attachment No. 20 RRLRT No. 1. Committee. Busway Grade Crossings STATUS/DATE OF ACTION

Peter Axelson. Beneficial Designs, Inc. Minden, NV

Lake Apopka Trail Loop Design Guidelines

FINAL. Bicycle/Pedestrian Feasibility Study City of DeBary Dirksen Drive Trail. Prepared For: Volusia County MPO

PULLMAN-MOSCOW REGIONAL AIRPORT Runway Realignment Project

Classifications, Inventory and Level of Service

COMMUNITY MEETING NOVEMBER 1, Wheaton Regional Park Pine Lake Trail

Assessing Your Trails, Keeping Them Safe and Enjoyable

Project Overview. Hunter Mill Road Over Colvin Run Bridge Replacement Fairfax County. Get Involved. Public Information Meeting. Contact Information

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FALL Introduction. Findings

4.0 Context for the Crossing Project

Dufferin Jog Elimination Project

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2019 Request for Proposals (RFP)

LANDER COUNTY RAIL ASSESSMENT NOVEMBER 2006

ATTACHMENT B. Reference No.

Crystal City Station Improvements. Project Overview. Table 2: North Entrance. Table 1: South Entrance. 20th St. S 18th St. S.

Clackamas County Development Agency

MERRYMEETING TRAIL A&B. Topsham. Head of Tide Park Trail (Tedford Road to Cathance Road) Length: 1.79 Miles Anticipated Cost: $719,000.

BACKCOUNTRY TRAIL FLOOD REHABILITATION PROGRAM

Trails, steps, & P-Patch to be south of I- 5 Colonnade

10.1 INTRODUCTION NORTH PERRY AIRPORT MASTER PLAN UPDATE SECTION 10: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

Section 3.6. Parklands & Recreation Areas

Proposal to Redevelop Lower Kananaskis River-Barrier Lake. Bow Valley Provincial Park. Frequently Asked Questions

Bike/Pedestrian/Golf Cart Trail Recommendations for the City of Dasher

City Council Workshop July 26, 2010

CHAPTER FOUR: TRANSPORTATION

United States Department of the Interior National Park Service. Boundary Expansion Listed in National Register January 11, 2017

Section 4(f) and Section 6(f) Technical Analysis

Community Development Committee

To: From: Plans showing the alignments of the routes discussed in this section are presented in Appendix A.

Open Space Index. Town of Philipstown. Adopted January 8, Submitted by: Philipstown Conservation Advisory Committee

Transcription:

BEACON LINE RAIL TRAIL BREWSTER TO HOPEWELL JUNCTION OCTOBER 2017 DRAFT CONCEPT PLAN

Page left intentionally blank

TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Executive Summary...i CHAPTER 01: INTRODUCTION Introduction...2 Trail Benefits...3 Study Area Overview...5 Summary of Previous Plans and Initiatives...7 Maybrook Trailway...7 Opportunities & Challenges...9 CHAPTER 02: PROPOSED TRAIL ROUTE Introduction... 12 Trail Details...13 Track Alignment...13 Cross-Sections...17 Undergrade Open Deck Bridges... 21 Undergrade Culverts...25 Overhead Bridges...26 Trailheads... 27 On-Road Recommendations... 28 At-Grade Road Crossing Recommendations... 28 Drainage...29 Proposed Trail Route...31 Section 1...31 CHAPTER 03: ACTION PLAN Next Steps... 44 Public Outreach... 44 Public Workshops... 44 Stakeholder Meetings... 44 Environmental Review and Permitting Requirements... 45 State Environmental Quality Review (SEQR) Compliance... 45 Prior SEQR Review 2010 Statewide Trails Plan... 45 National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Compliance... 45 Action Plan for SEQR and NEPA Compliance... 45 Permits... 46 MAPS Proposed Trail Route... iv Study Area Overview Map...6 Existing Track Location within ROW Map...14 Existing Track Alignment and Proposed Track Crossings Map... 16 Section 1: Proposed Trail Route Map... 32 Section 2: Proposed Trail Route Map... 34 Section 3: Proposed Trail Route Map... 36 Section 4: Proposed Trail Route Map... 38 Section 5: Proposed Trail Route Map... 40 Section 2... 33 Section 3... 35 Section 4...37 Section 5... 39 Cost Estimate...41

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this study is to assess the feasibility of constructing a shared-use path along Metro-North Railroad (MNR) Beacon Line Corridor from Brewster, NY to Hopewell Junction, NY. This project is a key part of the Empire State Trail - connecting a significant gap in the Hudson Valley Greenway Trail between the Putnam Trailway and the Dutchess Rail Trail and Walkway Over the Hudson State Park. The trail corridor runs through a beautiful section of the Hudson Valley, with long stretches through rural landscapes and wooded areas featuring seasonal waterfalls, rock cuts and a crossing of the Appalachian Trail along the way. The trail corridor provides for a continuous, level shareduse path that will be accessible to people of all ages and abilities, including walking, bicycling, wheelchairs and other uses. The Beacon Line does not currently have active train traffic. The full corridor is 34 miles long (Brewster, NY to Beacon, NY), but the focus of this study is to provide a rail with trail on the Brewster to Hopewell Junction portion. The proposed Beacon Line Rail Trail crosses through two counties (Putnam and Dutchess) and five towns (Southeast, Patterson, Pawling, Beekman, and East Fishkill). Rail Corridor West of S. Greenhaven Road - Beekman i

An existing conditions inventory for the Beacon Line Rail Trail was taken to document the following attributes along the corridor: Location of the single track (north, centered, or south) Undergrade bridges Undergrade culverts Overhead bridges At-grade roadway crossings Trailheads and access points Challenges to trail development The design of the trail will also have to consider MNR s underground fiber optic line and ensure that the final design of the trail does not impact operation of or maintenance to the line and its structures. The existing conditions inventory was a key element in determining the conceptual alignment of the Beacon Line Rail Trail. Once complete the trail will provide considerable benefits to the region, attracting visitors to the scenic landscapes and community centers dotting the corridor. The legacy of the railway including its associated infrastructure, surrounding environment, and adjacent land use present a host of variables and challenges to construction. The following highlights some of those opportunities and challenges: Connecting recreational opportunities Scenic and tranquil surroundings Tracks cannot be removed from the corridor Single-track bridges along the corridor Narrow right-of-way due to rock cuts or overhead bridges Tracks down the center of the corridor in some locations Existing infrastructure The preferred alignment for the Beacon Line Rail Trail primarily follows the alignment of the Beacon Line from Brewster, NY to Hopewell Junction, NY. Rail Corridor and existing chain link fence near Route 164 - Patterson Rail Corridor West of S. Route 292 - Pawling ii

Executive Summary BEACON LINE RAIL TRAIL CONCEPT PLAN The proposed shared-use path begins at the northern end of the Maybrook Trailway, at Tonetta Road in Brewster, and ends at the southern end of the Hopewell Rail Yard in Hopewell, Junction. The Beacon Line Rail Trail will travel through the Hopewell Rail Yard, connecting to the Dutchess Rail Trail beneath Route 82. In addition, the project will create a connection between the Putnam Trailway and the Maybrook Trailway using Route 6 and Main Street. The trail will comprise a total of 23.5 miles of off-road routes and 0.7 miles of on-road routes. The preliminary assessment of the trail alignment identified several areas where the existing track may conflict with the trail. To overcome this challenge, the Plan recommends extending the trail outside the rail bed (but still within the railroad right-of-way) to reach the crossing point, This alternative approach will also require creating a new track crossing where none currently exists in one location. The various types and widths of rights-of-way along the Beacon Rail Line require multiple crosssections. These include two preferred options, a reduced option for more narrow rights-of-way, as well as three special case options for undergrade bridges, undergrade culverts, and overhead bridges. There are ten existing undergrade bridges along the rail alignment that will require improvements to complete the trail. For the most part, the structural elements of these bridges (abutments and main carrying beams) are intact and serviceable based on field observations by structural engineers. The design intent is to utilize the existing structures to provide a functional, efficient, and cost effective solution to allow for reestablishing crossings along the rail trail corridor. The existing structure of the rail bridges will be assessed and the proposed work will consist of the construction of timber decking and wood or metal railings on top of the existing rail structures. There are multiple undergrade culverts along the corridor which provide passage for cattle, drainage, and streams. The undergrade culverts in almost all instances take one of two forms: A pipe or culvert section, typically steel or concrete; A short-span bridge, constructed using rail sections across two concrete or stone walls, with concrete cast over the top of the rail sections. For protection of trail users, safety fencing should be provided above the undergrade culverts. There are several roads that pass over the Beacon Line along the length of the trail project. These carry major highways and state, county, and local roads. The primary impact of these overhead bridges will be constraints on trail width due to clear space available between the bents or abutment walls supporting the bridges. Five trailheads and two gateways are recommended to provide users a place to easily access the trail. These trailheads can include parking areas, wayfinding signage, and various amenities such as bike repair stations, benches, picnic tables, bike racks, trash, and receptacles. iii *See section maps for locations of trailheads, undergrade bridges, undergrade culverts, overhead bridges, at-grade road crossings, and on-road routes.

LA GRANGE Tymor Park UNION VALE 55 DOVER WAPPINGER BEEKMAN PARKWAY Sylvan DUTCHESS RAIL TRAIL Hopewell Junction STATE TACONIC 216 PAWLING 22 EAST FISHKILL Village of Pawling Whaley 55 APPALACHIAN TRAIL MAP DUTCHESS COUNTY PUTNAM COUNTY White Pond HERE Wonder State Park PATTERSON 311 164 KENT Clarence Fahnestock Memorial State Park TACONIC STATE Nimham Mountain Putnam County Park Carmel 22 PARKWAY BEACON LINE RAIL TRAIL: PROPOSED TRAIL ROUTE West Branch PUTNAM TRAILWAY Bog Brook PUTNAM VALLEY Proposed Trail Route Endpoints Existing Shared-Use Path Proposed Shared-Use Path Proposed On-Road Routes Miles 0 0.5 1 2 3 N CARMEL 6 6 Village of Brewster 6 SOUTHEAST East Branch iv LB 202 iv

Executive Summary BEACON LINE RAIL TRAIL CONCEPT PLAN Drainage of the trail will be handled primarily by sheet flow off the path surface and into the existing drain system for the railroad. Given the existing conditions, it is assumed that the trail will not significantly increase the amount of impermeable surface in the corridor, and so there should be sufficient capacity within the system to accept the additional runoff. Sections where the railbed is currently not draining well will require improvements, such as swales or stormwater piping, to correct the drainage flow and accept the additional runoff. The proposed trail alignment primarily follows the existing track alignment. If necessary, there are short on-road segments recommended in the southern and northern sections of the trail connecting to the Putnam Trailway and Dutchess Rail Trail, respectively. Facility recommendations for each on-road route and at-grade crossing were determined using the On-Road Bicycle Facility Selection and EST Crossing Treatment Selection tables included in the Empire State Trail Design Guide. These tables consider roadway characteristics such as the functional classification, speed limit, AADT, and number of lanes of each roadway to determine appropriate on-road facilities and crossings. Safe crossing recommendations are provided at all atgrade crossings along the shared-use path. There are a total of 0.7 miles of on-road facilities and 14 at-grade crossings along the Beacon Line Rail Trail conceptual alignment. A concept phase estimate budget cost has been prepared for the project. Basic trail construction costs were assumed for the shared-use path portion of the Beacon Line Rail Trail. Included in these costs were: Construction of a new superstructure, where missing; Trail amenities such as trailheads, site furniture, wayfinding signage, fencing, and other improvements; Drainage and utility work; Improvements at road crossings; and The on-road segments of the trail. The estimate also includes a number of multipliers to reflect the hard and soft costs of the total project as follows: Escalation on Construction: 5% per year for two years Engineering and Survey: 15% General Contingency: 25% The total cost for the project, including the above multipliers, is currently estimated between $38 and $43 million. v

Following completion of the Concept Plan, the development of a public involvement process will be a high priority for the next phase of work. This process will involve two different tracks of meetings: Public Workshops Stakeholder Meetings A proposed schedule for design and construction of the Beacon Trail is as follows: Preliminary design: November 2017 - July 2018 Design/Build procurement and permitting: August 2018 - January 2019 Design/Build (final design and construction: February 2019 - December 2020 Final acceptance and contract close-out: January 2021 - April 2021 Dutchess Rail Trail - East Fishkill vi

01 INTRODUCTION

INTRODUCTION The purpose of this Concept Plan is to guide development of a shared-use path along the Metro-North Railroad (MNR) Beacon Railroad Line corridor from Brewster, NY to Hopewell Junction, NY. This project is a key part of the Empire State Trail - connecting a significant gap in the Hudson Valley Greenway Trail between the Putnam Line Rail Trail and the Dutchess Rail Trail and Walkway Over the Hudson State Park. When completed, this section of the EST will connect from New York City to New Paltz. The report provides a detailed concept and typical sections for MNR to use in their detailed design of the project. The majority of existing undergrade bridges along the corridor are intact and were designed to carry two rail lines, providing an opportunity for adaptive re-use of the structures for the trail. The rail with trail is planned assuming the railroad tracks need to remain intact for the length of the corridor. The trail corridor runs through a beautiful section of the Hudson Valley landscape, with long stretches through wooded areas featuring seasonal waterfalls, rock cuts and a crossing of the Appalachian Trail along the way. There are opportunities to tell the story of the railroad and the region s history on the trail, and trailhead locations are identified. The trail corridor provides for a continuous, level shared use path that will be accessible to people of all ages and abilities, including walking, bicycling, wheelchairs and other uses. The Beacon Line does not currently have active train traffic. The railroad tracks must remain along the line for potential future use. The full corridor is 34 miles long (Brewster, NY to Beacon, NY), but the focus of this study is to provide a rail with trail on the Brewster to Hopewell Junction portion of the corridor to complete the gap in the Hudson River Valley Greenway Trail. Rail corridor and exsiting chain link fence beneath I- - Southeast 2

Introduction BEACON LINE RAIL TRAIL CONCEPT PLAN TRAIL BENEFITS HEALTH AND WELL-BEING The Beacon Line Rail Trail will improve the health and well-being of residents and visitors to the Hudson Valley, as access to outdoor activities increases participation in healthy lifestyles and improves the academic performance of children. Regular exercise reduces the likelihood of heart and respiratory disease. People with access to trails exercise more regularly than those without access to similar recreational opportunities. TRANSPORTATION Trails provide alternatives for getting around for people without access to cars or transit as well as for those wanting to choose a healthier transportation alternative. Construction of the Beacon Line Rail Trail will increase mobility and accessibility by providing a new recreational opportunity. SAFETY Trails provide safer recreational opportunities for all users. They provide a designated space for bicyclists and pedestrians and minimize interactions with motor vehicle traffic. This is especially important for the children in the region. ECONOMIC The positive economic impacts of trails include recreation-based tourism, an increase in property values, an enhanced ability to attract new employers and employees, and development of new industries, such as visitor services and outdoor related product sales, to accommodate the increase in recreational opportunities in the area. EDUCATION Not only do trails provide outdoor learning opportunities, but children with access to open space resources demonstrate higher academic achievement, better attendance, and higher levels of concentration. They also provide children with the opportunity to discover local natural and cultural heritage. ENVIRONMENT Trails benefit the environment as well as the people they serve. Trails provide opportunities for habitat protection and enhancement, stormwater and flood retention, improved water and air quality, conservation of natural and cultural resources, and scenic views. CIVIC ENGAGEMENT Greenways provide opportunities for diverse groups of people to discover common interests and form a sense of community. Whether as a means of improving quality of life, our health, our children s well-being or our natural places, civic leadership springs from community engagement. When neighbors are engaged, employers are enthused, and visitors are attracted, the vitality of a community is boosted. 3

Page left intentionally blank 4

Introduction BEACON LINE RAIL TRAIL FEASIBILITY STUDY STUDY AREA OVERVIEW The Beacon Line Rail Trail crosses through two counties (Putnam and Dutchess) and five towns (Southeast, Patterson, Pawling, Beekman, and East Fishkill). For the most of its length, the corridor is wooded and rural in character, providing a unique trail experience within a day s travel from the New York metro region. The trail is located only a few miles north and east of I-, and crosses the Taconic State Parkway at its northern end. There is MNR station access nearby at Poughkeepsie and in Brewster, providing multi-modal access to transit along the trail. At the southern end, the Beacon Line will connect to the Putnam Trailway. This connection will continue south via the Westchester County trail system to New York City. At the northern end in Hopewell Junction, the trail will link with the Dutchess Rail Trail and the Walkway Over the Hudson Bridge. Counties Putnam County Dutchess County Towns Southeast Patterson Pawling Beekman East Fishkill The corridor is presented in five sections throughout the remainder of this document. The five sections are shown on the locator map on the adjacent page. 5

LA GRANGE Tymor Park UNION VALE 55 DOVER WAPPINGER BEEKMAN DUTCHESS RAIL TRAIL Hopewell Junction PARKWAY STATE 5 Sylvan 4 3 TACONIC 216 PAWLING 22 EAST FISHKILL Village of Pawling Whaley 55 APPALACHIAN TRAIL MAP 2 DUTCHESS COUNTY PUTNAM COUNTY White Pond HERE Wonder State Park PATTERSON 311 164 Clarence Fahnestock Memorial State Park TACONIC STATE KENT Nimham Mountain Putnam County Park Carmel 22 1 PARKWAY PUTNAM VALLEY CARMEL West Branch 6 PUTNAM TRAILWAY 6 Village of Brewster Bog Brook SOUTHEAST East Branch 6 Miles 0 0.5 1 2 3 N 6 LB 202 6

Introduction BEACON LINE RAIL TRAIL CONCEPT PLAN SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS PLANS AND INITIATIVES MAYBROOK TRAILWAY The Maybrook Trailway runs adjacent to the rail line for 13.6 miles from the Dutchess County line in New York to Danbury, Connecticut. The planning, design, and construction process of the Maybrook Trailway was originally broken up into three phases. There are currently 1.8 miles of shared-use path constructed from Danbury Road to Tonetta Road and there are design documents for 5.4 miles of shared-use path from the New York/Connecticut line to Pumphouse Road. A chain link fence, typically 3 meters from the center of the rail line, was installed in 2010 to provide separation to the proposed path. Section I of the Maybrook Trailway from Route 164, near Bullet Hole Road, north to Holmes Road is under design. Currently a 10-foot-wide asphalt path complete with drainage spans 1.8 miles of the proposed 5.4 miles of trailway (section II). Yet to be designed, section III of the proposed trailway is proposed to run adjacent to 4.5 miles of track between Route 164, near Bullet Hole Road, south to Pumphouse Road near Tonetta. Stage 4 construction of the Putnam bikeway will be to connect to the Maybrook Trailway by way of a 120-foot multi-span bridge across the Metro-North Rail Yard. Delays in the design and completion of all these links are due in part to the complex set of regulations and agencies that govern development in this area, which includes the New York City water supply watershed, wetlands, utilities, and active rail lines. The typical cross-section includes a chain link fence at 3 meters (approx. 10 ft) from the center of the rail line. The asphalt path is constructed using a 50mm HMA pavement for the surface, 150mm subbase, above a geotextile bedding. The path is typically 10 feet wide and off-set from the chain link fence by 2 feet where space provides. A crushed stone shoulder slows sheet flow in to a standard drainage swale or infiltration system. 7

Maybrook Trailway - Brewster Maybrook Trailway - Brewster 8

Introduction BEACON LINE RAIL TRAIL CONCEPT PLAN OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES The Beacon Line is the last segment needed to complete a trail network spanning several counties north of New York City along the Hudson River Valley and offers the greatest opportunity to leverage an existing and underutilized corridor into a regional attraction. Once complete the trail is expected to provide considerable benefits to the region, to attract visitors to the scenic landscapes and community centers dotting the corridor. Where the history of the region and early investments in the railway provide a prime location and consistent set of physical conditions for a trail, the legacy of the railway including its associated infrastructure, surrounding environment, and land use present a host of variables and challenges to construction. The following highlights some of those opportunities and challenges: Tracks must remain - Though the tracks are used infrequently and would require significant upgrades to permit passenger service, the Metro- North Railroad will retain the rail. Track crossings - Locations where the trail crosses the tracks must be carefully planned. Connecting recreation - The trail presents enormous opportunity to connect parks and trails, including the historic Appalachian Trail. Users may only cross the track at existing at-grade crossings The Southeast Town Park is one recreational area along the corridor 9

Single-track bridges - Only at that location (at MP 31.03) a new superstructure will need to be constructed as part of this project. At other locations the Design-Builder will utilize the existing superstructure Narrow right-of-way - There are many constrained corridors due to the natural rock features/walls. Tracks down the center - Some sections of the track are currently located in the center of the corridor. Existing infrastructure - While improvements will be necessary, the existing line provides a level surface and consistent corridor which generally eliminates costly property acquisitions and reduces construction costs. Scenic and separated - Users will appreciate the level of comfort and access to views not normally available from the roadway. Fiber Optic Line - MNR installed a fiber optic communications line that runs the length of the corridor. The line has handholes and other atgrade structures that must be considered in the final design of the trail. The line should be left in place and undisturbed; if relocation of any portions of the line are required, the final design team must review thiese changes with MNR before proceeding. Rock faces ddjacent to right-of-way 10

02 PROPOSED TRAIL ROUTE

INTRODUCTION The preferred alignment for the Beacon Line Rail Trail follows the alignment of the Beacon Line from Brewster, NY to Hopewell Junction, NY. This line does not have active railroad service as this time. The trail begins at the northern end of the Maybrook Trailway, at Tonetta Road in Brewster, and ends at the Hopewell Rail Yard in Hopewell Junction, where it will connect to the existing Dutchess Rail Trail. The trail will comprise a total of 23.5 miles of off-road routes. This Concept Plan recommends an interim connection between the Putnam Trailway and the Maybrook Trailway using Route 6 and Main Street. This on-road section will provide connectivity for the Empire State Trail system until the proposed bridge over the Harlem Line is completed. The entity responsible for construction of the on-road connection has yet to be determined. Before Trail Construction - Pawling After Trail Construction - Pawling The Beacon Line Rail Tail will provide a safe and enjoyable space for bicycling and walking for all ages and abilities. 12

Proposed Trail Route BEACON LINE RAIL TRAIL CONCEPT PLAN TRAIL DETAILS TRACK ALIGNMENT The preliminary assessment of the trail alignment identified several areas where the existing track may conflict with the trail. MNR has provided preliminary pricing guidelines for estimating the cost of the track work, which includes removal of the existing track and installation of new track in the realigned location. The cost of this work is outside the project s budget. On an interim basis, the initial alignment of the trail will need to work around the existing track positions, which should be achievable while remaining within the railroad ROW. The map indicates the current location of the track within the right-of-way. The next pages describe the recommended track crossings. Existing Conditions - West of Old Route Track begins to center heading west from Old Route. Existing Conditions - East of Old Route As shown in the image, the track is currently on the north side of the corridor just east of the Old Route intersection. Farther east, however, the track is located on the south side of the corridor. 13

LA GRANGE Tymor Park UNION VALE 55 DOVER WAPPINGER BEEKMAN PARKWAY Sylvan DUTCHESS RAIL TRAIL Hopewell Junction STATE TACONIC 216 PAWLING 22 EAST FISHKILL Village of Pawling Whaley 55 APPALACHIAN TRAIL MAP DUTCHESS COUNTY PUTNAM COUNTY White Pond HERE Wonder State Park PATTERSON 311 164 KENT Clarence Fahnestock Memorial State Park TACONIC STATE Nimham Mountain Putnam County Park Carmel 22 PARKWAY PUTNAM VALLEY West Branch CARMEL BEACON LINE RAIL TRAIL: EXISTING TRACK LOCATION WITHIN ROW Centered North South 6 PUTNAM TRAILWAY 6 Village of Brewster Bog Brook SOUTHEAST East Branch 6 Miles 0 0.5 1 2 3 N 14 LB 202 14

Proposed Trail Route BEACON LINE RAIL TRAIL CONCEPT PLAN TRACK CROSSINGS Instead of relocating the tracks, the Plan proposes crossing the tracks at six locations. Two of these locations are existing grade crossings; a third is a temporary crossing apparently created by MNR; the fourth, fifth, and sixth would be new crossings. A description of each location follows. 1. Fishkill Creek (MP 12.97): Heading eastbound, along the recommended trail through Hopewell Yard, the trail will be located on the north side of the track as it approaches the bridge over Fishkill Creek. The trail right-of-way south of the Fishkill Creek bridge is located on the southern side of the track. A track crossing is recommended west of the bridge over Fishkill Creek. 2. Stormville Road/Old Rte. (MP 16.13): Heading eastbound, the trail will approach the existing Stormville Road/Old Rte. grade crossing on the south side of the existing tracks, use the road s grade crossing to move to the north side, and then continue along the north side. The approaches to the crossing are relatively flat on both sides of the road, but some grading will be required to construct the trail. There appears to be sufficient width in the ROW to accommodate the work. 3. Private Crossing off Rte. 164 (MP 30.71): Heading eastbound, the trail will approach this existing private grade crossing on the north side of the tracks and cross over to the south side using the crossing. The crossing will require improvements to make it suitable for bicycle use. There is sufficient room on the north side of the track to construct the trail to the west of the crossing; east of the crossing considerable grading will be required to accommodate the trail until the track shifts sufficiently to the north to get the trail back on top of the prism. There appears to be sufficient width in the ROW to accommodate the work. 4. Muddy Brook Culvert (MP 31.31): East of the Harlem Line bridge, the tracks shift from the north side of the alignment to the south side for about two miles. There is not sufficient room to construct the trail to the south of the track s current position without extensive grading and potentially filling in the wetlands along Muddy Brook and Ice Pond, so crossing the tracks is required. There are also no existing grade crossings that can be used. There appears to be a wide spot in the corridor just east of the Muddy Brook culvert that will accommodate the trail on the south side approaching the crossing and the north side east of it. The crossing will be constructed to allow passage of bicycles and pedestrians. 5. Ice Pond (MP 33.10): The track returns to the north side of the corridor at the south end of Ice Pond, which will require the trail to cross back to the south side. There is an existing temporary crossing at this location, which appears to have been created to allow maintenance vehicles to access the corridor between this point and the Harlem Line bridge. The trail project will improve this temporary crossing to allow for pedestrian and bicycle use. 6. Harlem Line Connector Crossing (MP 33.70): There is a spur track connecting the Harlem Line to the Beacon Line at approximately MP 33.70; this connection is on the south side of the Beacon Line tracks, which is also where the trail will be located through this section. A maintenance crossing has been created over the spur tracks; it will be improved to provide for bicycle and pedestrian traffic. Fencing to separate this area from the Harlem Line will also be required. 15

LA GRANGE Tymor Park UNION VALE 55 DOVER WAPPINGER BEEKMAN PARKWAY Sylvan DUTCHESS RAIL TRAIL Hopewell Junction STATE 1 TACONIC 216 PAWLING 22 2 EAST FISHKILL Village of Pawling Whaley 55 APPALACHIAN TRAIL MAP DUTCHESS COUNTY PUTNAM COUNTY White HERE Pond Wonder State Park 3 PATTERSON 311 4 164 KENT Clarence Fahnestock Memorial State Park TACONIC STATE Nimham Mountain Putnam County Park Carmel 6 5 22 PARKWAY PUTNAM VALLEY West Branch PUTNAM TRAILWAY CARMEL BEACON LINE RAIL TRAIL: EXISTING TRACK ALIGNMENT AND PROPOSED TRACK CROSSINGS Centered North South Track Crossing 6 6 Village of Brewster Bog Brook SOUTHEAST East Branch 6 Miles 0 0.5 1 2 3 N 16 LB 202 16

Proposed Trail Route BEACON LINE RAIL TRAIL CONCEPT PLAN CROSS-SECTIONS The various types and widths of rights-of-way along the Beacon Rail Line require multiple crosssections. These include two preferred options, a reduced option for more narrow rights-of-way, as well as three special case options for undergrade bridges, undergrade culverts, and overhead bridges. PREFERRED OPTION A The primary preferred cross-section includes a 10-foot wide paved shared-use path with 2-foot shoulders on either side. The edge of the shoulder is 10 feet from the centerline of the track and includes a maintenance road on the opposite side of the tracks. Preferred A Shoulder 2 ft Shared-Use Path 10 ft Shoulder 2 ft Setback 10 ft Maintenance Road Not to Scale 17

PREFERRED OPTION B The secondary preferred cross-section is similar to the Preferred A cross-section. It also includes a 10-foot wide paved shared-use path with 2-foot shoulders on either side. The setback between theedge of the shoulder and the centerline of the track is wider (17 feet) to make room for a maintenance road. Preferred B REDUCED The reduced option removes the maintenance road from the cross-section. The paved sharedused path is still 10 feet with 2-foot shoulders on either side and the edge of the shoulder is 8 feet 6 inches from the track centerline. Reduced Shoulder 2 ft Shared-Use Path 10 ft Shoulder 2 ft Setback/Maintenance Road 17 ft Shoulder 2 ft Shared-Use Path 10 ft Shoulder 2 ft Setback 8 ft 6 in Not to Scale Not to Scale 18

Proposed Trail Route BEACON LINE RAIL TRAIL CONCEPT PLAN UNDERGRADE BRIDGE The trail and track alignments are separated when going over undergrade bridges. The trail will use existing superstructure where possible with additional decking. The shared-use path will be 10 feet wide with fences on either side. UNDERGRADE CULVERT The undergrade culvert cross-section is similar to the Reduced option with the same paved shared-use path (10 feet), shoulder (2 feet), and setback (8 feet 6 inches) configuration. Currently, where the alignment travels over an undergrade culvert, the track centerline is placed 10 feet from the edge of the undergrade culvert. Bridge Culvert Shared-Use Path 10 ft Shoulder 1 ft Shared-Use Path 10 ft Shoulder 1 ft Setback 8 ft 6 in Culvert Edge to Track Centerline 10 ft Not to Scale Not to Scale 19

OVERHEAD BRIDGE The overhead bridge cross-section includes a paved shared-use path with shoulders on either side. This cross-section is included to depict the elements included in this special case option. Dimensions are not included in this option as each overhead bridge will require unique designs. Shoulder Shared-Use Path Shoulder Setback Not to Scale *Overhead bridge not shown in plan view. 20

Proposed Trail Route BEACON LINE RAIL TRAIL CONCEPT PLAN UNDERGRADE OPEN DECK BRIDGES There are ten existing undergrade bridges along the rail alignment that will require improvements to complete the trail. For the most part, the structural elements of these undergrade bridges (abutments and main carrying beams) are intact and serviceable based on field observations by the MNR s structural engineer, although some will require repairs to either the stone or masonry structures or the steel elements that remain. Retaining as much of the existing structures as possible is important to minimize design and construction costs and to reduce the project s exposure to permitting and secondary improvements that might be necessary with a more extensive bridge replacement approach. The design intent is to utilize the existing structures to provide a functional, efficient, and cost effective solution to allow for reestablishing crossings along the rail trail corridor. Based on these goals, the existing structure of the undergrade bridges will be utilized and the proposed work will consist of the construction of timber decking and wood or metal railings on top of the existing rail structures. To connect the decking to the bridge, a supporting framework will be mounted to the existing bridge structure. Work to abutments and existing structures will be limited to any structural and cosmetic repairs necessary to put them into a serviceable and durable condition. One undergrade bridge (MP 31.03) on this section lacks the steel superstructure that was originally constructed for the undergrade bridge, and thus will require an entirely new span attached to the existing abutments. The design intent for this undergrade bridge will be to match the structural system and aesthetic character of the other bridges along this new trail section and those that have already been rebuilt elsewhere along the Beacon Line; however, should a different structural type, such as a pre-engineered, modular, prefabricated weathering steel truss bridge, offer significant cost savings over matching the other bridges, the option will be considered. In either case, the existing abutments will be assessed, and work to abutments and existing structures would be limited to structural and cosmetic repairs. Pre-Fabricated Bridge Examples 21

LA GRANGE UNION VALE WAPPINGER DUTCHESS RAIL TRAIL Tymor Park Undergrade Bridges Requiring Improvement MP 31.20 - Harlem Line (Bridge 55 6655) MP 31.03 - Route 164 (Bridge 6656) MP 30.62 - Route 164 (Bridge 6727) MP 30.37 - Route 164 (Bridge 6726) BEEKMAN DOVER MP 30.02 - Route 311/Cattle Pass (Bridge 6709) MP 18.24 - Green Haven Pond (Bridge 6702) MP 16.92 - Eders Creek (Bridge 6701) MP 16.59 - Seaman Road (Bridge 6682) MP 13.06 PARKWAY MP 30.20 - Cattle Pass (Bridge 6725) Sylvan MP 13.06 - Fishkill Creek (Bridge 6678) Hopewell Junction STATE TACONIC 216 MP 16.92 PAWLING 22 EAST FISHKILL MP 18.24 Village of Pawling MP 16.59 Whaley 55 APPALACHIAN TRAIL DUTCHESS COUNTY PUTNAM COUNTY White Pond MP 30.20 Wonder State Park MP 30.02 PATTERSON MP 30.37 311 164 KENT TACONIC STATE MP 30.62 MP 31.03 Clarence Fahnestock Memorial State Park Nimham Mountain Putnam County Park Carmel MP 31.20 22 PARKWAY BEACON LINE RAIL TRAIL: UNDERGRADE BRIDGES REQUIRING IMPROVEMENT PUTNAM VALLEY Undergrade Bridges Requiring Improvement Existing Shared-Use Path Beacon Line Right-of-Way Miles 0 0.5 1 2 3 N CARMEL West Branch 6 PUTNAM TRAILWAY 6 Village of Brewster 6 Bog Brook SOUTHEAST East Branch 22 LB 202 22

Proposed Trail Route BEACON LINE RAIL TRAIL CONCEPT PLAN Green Haven Pond Undergrade Bridge (MP 18.24) Eders Creek Undergrade Bridge (MP 16.92) Fishkill Creek Undergrade Bridge (MP 13.06) 23

Seaman Road Undergrade Bridge (MP 16.59) Seaman Road Undergrade Bridge (MP 16.59) Route 311 Undergrade Bridge (MP 30.02) Route 311 Undergrade Bridge (MP 30.02) Route 164 (North) Undergrade Bridge (MP 30.37) Route 164 (North) Undergrade Bridge (MP 30.37) 24

Proposed Trail Route BEACON LINE RAIL TRAIL CONCEPT PLAN UNDERGRADE CULVERTS In addition to the undergrade bridges, there are numerous undergrade culverts along the alignment. These provide passage for cattle, drainage, and streams. The undergrade culverts in almost all instances take one of two forms: A pipe or culvert section, typically steel or concrete; Rail Top A short span bridge, constructed using rail sections placed longitudinally over two abutments with concrete cast over the top of the rail sections. These undergrade culverts were originally constructed to clear the width of a two-track layout; most were measured in the field at 31 to 34 feet in width at the top of the undergrade culvert, which should provide sufficient width to add the trail using the Reduced cross section described above. The side slopes of the embankments are typically very steep at these undergrade culverts (2 horizontal to 1 vertical or steeper); the short-span bridges are typically four to six feet above grade, plus an additional two to three feet of railbed section above the bridge, leaving a potential fall height of as much as seven to ten feet. For protection of trail users, safety fencing should be provided above the undergrade culverts. A four-foot high, bicycle friendly wooden rail fence is recommended. The fence should be comprised of 6 x6 timber posts with two 2 x6 rails. Frog Hollow Brook Undergrade Culvert Undergrade Culvert near Frog Hollow Road 25

OVERHEAD BRIDGES There are several roads that pass over the Beacon Line along the length of the trail project. These carry major highways, such I- and the Taconic Parkway, and county and local roads, such as Tonetta Road and County Road 312. The primary impact of these overhead bridges will be constraints on trail width due to clear space available between the bents or abutment walls supporting the overhead bridges. In some cases, it may be possible to adjust the track location slightly to increase the available width for the trail. If not, shoulder width or even trail width may have to be reduced through the length of the overhead bridge. In no case should the trail width be reduced below 8 feet clear. Route 292 Overhead Bridge Carpenter Road (Route 29) Overhead Bridge View of Corridor from Carpenter Road (Route 29) Overhead Bridge 26

Proposed Trail Route BEACON LINE RAIL TRAIL CONCEPT PLAN TRAILHEADS Five trailheads and two gateways are recommended to provide users a place to easily access the trail. These trailheads can include parking areas, wayfinding signage, and various amenities such as bike repair stations, benches, picnic tables, and bike racks. The following locations provide examples of potential trailheads. Additional study is needed to refine final trailhead locations. The locations of these trailheads are tentative and based on current knowledge of the corridor. Exact locations will depend on factors such as existing rights-of-way, consultation with involved local officials, and public input. GATEWAYS Empire State Trail Gateways are significant trailheads that reflect local culture and emphasize the connection to a statewide trail system. Each gateway will be an actively managed park with a full array of amenities. Markel Park, Brewster (Gateway) Southeast Town Park/ Tonetta Beach, Southeast Route 164, Patterson Holmes Road, Pawling Appalachian Trail, Pawling Old Route, East Fishkill Dutchess Rail Trail Trailhead (existing), Hopewell Junction (Gateway) Southeast Town Park/ Tonetta Beach The existing parking at this location can be used as a base for a trailhead. Additional amenities can be added to provide resources for trail users. A trailhead can include a parking area, benches, picnic tables, and other amenities and includes wayfinding and perhaps other information about the history of the area and trail. 27

ON-ROAD RECOMMENDATIONS On-road recommendations were made using the standards within the Empire State Trail Design Guide. This included analyzing the speed limit and average annual daily traffic (AADT) values of each roadway. AT-GRADE ROAD CROSSING RECOMMENDATIONS Roadway crossing recommendations were made for each at-grade crossing using the standards within the Empire State Trail Design Guide. This included analyzing the speed limit, number of lanes, and functional classification of each roadway. Shared Roadway Rapid Rectangular Flash Beacon (RRFB) Bike Lane Marked Crosswalk with Yield Lines 28

Proposed Trail Route BEACON LINE RAIL TRAIL CONCEPT PLAN DRAINAGE Drainage of the trail will be handled primarily by sheet flow off the path surface and into the existing drain system for the railroad. Considering the lack of permeability of the highly compacted soils beneath the existing roadbed, the trail will not significantly increase the amount of impermeable surface in the corridor, and so there should be sufficient capacity within the system to accept the additional runoff. There are sections where the railbed is currently not draining well, such as around MP 21 (between Depot Hill Road and Bard Street) and near the Green Haven Correctional Facility, and improvements to correct the drainage flow and accept the additional runoff will be required. In these areas, swales paralleling the trail will be required, and in some instances piping of stormwater may also be required, although the intent is to minimize the amount of piping and structures. It will be important to maintain adequate drainage from the remaining rail so that water does not interfere with the operation of trains. To accomplish this, the pathway should be cross-pitched away from the remaining rail line rather than being crowned, which would trap water between the railroad and the trail. A portion of the Beacon Line Rail Trail lies within the NYC Watershed, managed by New York City Department of Environmental Protection (NYCDEP). Approximately 10.5 miles of the Rail Trail is within the NYC watershed, but potentially only 3.7 of these miles are subject to NYCDEP mitigation due to proximity to water resources. Under NYC DEP s regulations, more extensive stormwater collection and conveyance systems will be required, including continuous swales adjacent to the trail, structured outfalls into existing water bodies and streams, and other best practices to maintain water quality. MNR will review the project with NYCDEP staff is needed to determine the extent of the stormwater system within this area; see Environmental Review and Permitting Requirements under Next Steps in this document for more information. Drainage Issues - Route 292, Pawling 29

30

LB Proposed Trail Route BEACON LINE RAIL TRAIL CONCEPT PLAN PROPOSED TRAIL ROUTE WAPPINGER LA GRANGE Tymor Park 55 BEEKMAN UNION VALE DOVER The proposed trail alignment primarily follows the existing track alignment. There are short on-road segments recommended in the southern section of the trail connecting to the Putnam Trailway. DUTCHESS RAIL TRAIL Hopewell Junction EAST FISHKILL TACONIC PARKWAY STATE Sylvan 216 Whaley PAWLING 55 Village of Pawling 22 SECTION 1 This plan recommends creating on-road routes to connect the existing Putnam Trailway and Maybrook Trailway. Bicyclists can utilize the recommended shared roadways, paved shoulders, and bike lanes on Putnam Avenue, Carmel Avenue (Route 6), and North Main Street, respectively. Pedestrians can use the shared roadways and existing sidewalks. To further accommodate pedestrians, new sidewalks are recommended on the northern portion of North Main Street. Clarence Fahnestock Memorial State Park TACONIC STATE PARKWAY PUTNAM VALLEY APPALACHIAN TRAIL DUTCHESS COUNTY PUTNAM COUNTY White Pond KENT Nimham Mountain CARMEL Putnam County Park West Branch 6 Carmel PUTNAM TRAILWAY Wonder State Park 311 6 Village of Brewster PATTERSON 164 SOUTHEAST 6 Miles 0 0.5 1 2 3 22 Bog Brook 1 East Branch N 202 Multiple crossing recommendations are made to provide safe road crossings for bicyclists and pedestrians on the trail: Putnam Trailway at Putnam Avenue, Brewster: Marked and Signed Crosswalk Maybrook Trailway at North Main Street, Brewster: RRFB Crossing Pumphouse Road, Southeast: Marked Crosswalk with Yield Lines Southeast Town Park/ Tonetta Beach, Southeast: Marked and Signed Crosswalk A trailhead is recommended at Southeast Town Park and Tonetta Beach and a gateway is recommended at Markel Park in Brewster. 31

SECTION 2 62 Farm To Market Rd PATTERSON ICE POND 22 60 Foggintown Rd 62 SOUTHEAST MAP 58 Brewster Hill Rd 312 57 HERE LAKE SOUTHEAST TOWN PARK TONETTA 6 312 BOG BROOK RESEVOIR PUTNAM TRAILWAY Prospect Hill Rd Pumphouse Rd Tonetta Rd BEACON LINE RAIL TRAIL SECTION 1: PROPOSED TRAIL ROUTE MAP 22 MIDDLE BRANCH RESEVOIR Carmel Ave Putnam Ave 6 N Main St MAYBROOK TRAILWAY Existing Shared-Use Path Existing Sidewalk Shared-Use Path Paved Shoulder Bike Lane Shared Roadway RRFB Crossing Marked Crosswalk with Yield Lines Marked and Signed Crosswalk Proposed Trailhead Undergrade Culvert Overhead Bridge VILLAGE OF BREWSTER Sidewalk Beacon Line ROW Not Used For Trail Miles 0 0.25 0.5 1 N 32 LB 32

LB Proposed Trail Route BEACON LINE RAIL TRAIL CONCEPT PLAN SECTION 2 LA GRANGE Tymor Park UNION VALE Two crossing recommendations are made to provide safe road crossings for bicyclists and pedestrians on the trail: WAPPINGER DUTCHESS RAIL TRAIL Hopewell Junction PARKWAY STATE Sylvan 55 BEEKMAN DOVER Holmes Road, Pawling: RRFB Crossing TACONIC 216 PAWLING 22 Beaver Brook Road, Pawling: Marked and Signed Crosswalk Two trailheads are recommended at Route 164 in Patterson and at Holmes Road in Pawling. EAST FISHKILL APPALACHIAN TRAIL DUTCHESS COUNTY PUTNAM COUNTY White Pond Whaley 55 Village of Pawling 2 In order to utilize the right-of way, decking and improvements are recommended for all six railroad bridges within this section (MP 31.20, MP 31.03, MP 30.62, MP 30.37, MP 30.20, and MP 30.02). Clarence Fahnestock Memorial State Park TACONIC STATE PARKWAY KENT Nimham Mountain Putnam County Park West Branch Carmel PUTNAM TRAILWAY Wonder State Park 311 PATTERSON 164 22 Bog Brook PUTNAM VALLEY CARMEL 6 6 Village of Brewster SOUTHEAST East Branch 6 0 0.5 1 2 3 Miles N 202 33

SECTION 3 Bundy Hill Rd SECTION 3 292 PAWLING 69 DENTON LAKE Holmes Rd DUTCHESS COUNTY PUTNAM COUNTY WESTMINSTER LAKE Harmony Rd PATTERSON S VETERAN MEMORIAL PARK 311 22 292 Mooney Hill Rd Cross Rd GREAT SWAMP MAP 311 HERE Cushman Rd Couch Rd PATTERSON GREAT SWAMP WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT AREA 43 WONDER LAKE Couch Rd KENT Ludingtonville Rd 164 311 TURTLE POND 164 62 60 BEACON LINE RAIL TRAIL SECTION 2: PROPOSED TRAIL ROUTE MAP Shared-Use Path RRFB Crossing Marked and Signed Crosswalk Proposed Trailhead Undergrade Bridge Undergrade Culvert Overhead Bridge Miles 0 0.25 0.5 1 N 34 LB 34

LB Proposed Trail Route BEACON LINE RAIL TRAIL CONCEPT PLAN SECTION 3 LA GRANGE Tymor Park UNION VALE Four crossing recommendations are made to provide safe road crossings for bicyclists and pedestrians on the trail: WAPPINGER DUTCHESS RAIL TRAIL Hopewell Junction PARKWAY STATE Sylvan 55 BEEKMAN 3 DOVER Route 292, Pawling: RRFB Crossing TACONIC 216 PAWLING 22 Appalachian Trail, Pawling: Marked and Signed Crosswalk Bard Road, Beekman: Marked and Signed Crosswalk EAST FISHKILL APPALACHIAN TRAIL DUTCHESS COUNTY PUTNAM COUNTY White Pond Whaley 55 Village of Pawling Depot Hill Road, Beekman: Marked Crosswalk with Yield Lines KENT Wonder State Park 311 PATTERSON 164 One trailhead is recommended at Route 292 in Pawling. Clarence Fahnestock Memorial State Park TACONIC STATE PARKWAY Nimham Mountain Putnam County Park West Branch Carmel 22 PUTNAM TRAILWAY Bog Brook PUTNAM VALLEY CARMEL 6 6 Village of Brewster SOUTHEAST East Branch 6 0 0.5 1 2 3 Miles N 202 35

Depot Hill Rd 32 APPALACHIAN TRAIL 55 216 Old Route 55 NUCLEAR LAKE Penny Rd SECTION 4 APPALACHIAN TR AIL 292 55 MAP Old Route 55 DEPOT HILL HERE Little Pond Rd Harmony Hill Rd LITTLE WHALEY LAKE PAWLING BEEKMAN 292 55 WHALEY LAKE Harmony Rd 69 Byrne Rd 292 69 SECTION 4 BEACON LINE RAIL TRAIL SECTION 3: PROPOSED TRAIL ROUTE MAP Shared-Use Path Marked Crosswalk with Yield Lines RRFB Crossing Proposed Trailhead Marked and Signed Crosswalk Undergrade Culvert Overhead Bridge Miles 0 0.25 0.5 1 N 36 LB 36

LB Proposed Trail Route BEACON LINE RAIL TRAIL CONCEPT PLAN SECTION 4 LA GRANGE Tymor Park UNION VALE Two crossing recommendations are made to provide safe road crossings for bicyclists and pedestrians on the trail: WAPPINGER DUTCHESS RAIL TRAIL Hopewell Junction PARKWAY STATE Sylvan 55 BEEKMAN 4 DOVER South Green Haven Road, Beekman: RRFB Crossing EAST FISHKILL TACONIC 216 PAWLING Village of Pawling 22 Old Route, East Fishkill: Marked Crosswalk with Yield Lines One trailhead is recommended at Old Route in East Fishkill. APPALACHIAN TRAIL DUTCHESS COUNTY PUTNAM COUNTY White Pond Whaley Wonder State Park 55 PATTERSON In order to utilize the right-of way, decking and improvements are recommended for all three railroad bridges within this section (MP 18.24, MP 16.92, and MP 16.59). Clarence Fahnestock Memorial State Park TACONIC STATE PARKWAY KENT Nimham Mountain Putnam County Park West Branch Carmel 311 164 22 PUTNAM TRAILWAY Bog Brook PUTNAM VALLEY CARMEL 6 6 Village of Brewster SOUTHEAST East Branch 6 0 0.5 1 2 3 Miles N 202 37

Brothers Rd Sylvan Rd 9 Beekman Poughquag Rd SECTION 3 SYLVAN LAKE 10 Beekman Rd SECTION 5 9 BEEKMAN 8 216 EAST FISHKILL 216 GREEN HAVEN MAP CORRECTIONAL FACILITY 8 Stormville Rd 216 Green Haven RdS Green Haven Rd HERE SECTION 3 Old Route Eder Rd SECTION 5 Seaman Rd Devon Farms Rd APPALACHIAN TRAIL SECTION 3 BEACON LINE RAIL TRAIL SECTION 4: PROPOSED TRAIL ROUTE MAP Shared-Use Path Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon Crossing RRFB Crossing Marked Crosswalk with Yield Lines Proposed Trailhead Undergrade Bridge Undergrade Culvert Overhead Bridge Miles 0 0.25 0.5 1 N 38 LB 38

LB Proposed Trail Route BEACON LINE RAIL TRAIL CONCEPT PLAN SECTION 5 LA GRANGE Tymor Park UNION VALE Two crossing recommendations are made to provide safe road crossings for bicyclists and pedestrians on the trail: WAPPINGER DUTCHESS RAIL TRAIL Hopewell Junction PARKWAY STATE 5 Sylvan 55 BEEKMAN DOVER Route 216, East Fishkill: Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon Crossing EAST FISHKILL TACONIC 216 PAWLING Village of Pawling 22 East Fishkill Recreation Path at Church Street, East Fishkill: Marked and Signed Crosswalk There is an existing trailhead at the southern end of the Dutchess Rail Trail in Hopewell Junction. While this trailhead currently exists, this plan recommends additional bicycle and motor vehicle parking spaces as well as other amenities be added to the trailhead. The trailhead in Hopewell Junction will also double as an Empire State Trail Gateway. Clarence Fahnestock Memorial State Park TACONIC STATE PARKWAY PUTNAM VALLEY APPALACHIAN TRAIL DUTCHESS COUNTY PUTNAM COUNTY White Pond KENT Nimham Mountain CARMEL 6 Putnam County Park West Branch Whaley Carmel PUTNAM TRAILWAY Wonder State Park 311 6 55 Village of Brewster PATTERSON 164 22 Bog Brook SOUTHEAST East Branch N 202 Based on the surrounding area and lack of connections south of MP 13.06 (Bridge 6678), decking and improvements are recommended to enable trail users to cross Fishkill Creek. 6 0 0.5 1 2 3 Miles Immediately following the bridge, it is recommended trail users cross the track and utilize a proposed shared-use path through Hopewell Yard. This shared-use path will connect to the Dutchess Rail Trail beneath the overhead bridge at Route 82. 39

29 9 376 DUTCHESS RAIL TRAIL Railroad Ave HOPEWELL JUNCTION RED WING PARK 82 Clove Branch Rd 9 29 Beekman Rd Taconic State Parkway SECTION 4 82 BEACON LINE EXTENSION Church St HOPEWELL RECREATION PARK 29 Stormville Rd 216 376 GOLF COURSE 216 31 MAP EMMADINE POND TOWN PARK Carpenter Rd HERE Taconic State Parkway SECTION 4 EAST FISHKILL Lime Kiln Rd SECTION 4 27 APPALACHIAN TRAIL BEACON LINE RAIL TRAIL SECTION 5: PROPOSED TRAIL ROUTE MAP Existing Shared-Use Path Shared-Use Path Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon Crossing Proposed Trailhead Undergrade Bridge Undergrade Culvert Overhead Bridge Miles 0 0.25 0.5 1 N 40 LB 40

Proposed Trail Route BEACON LINE RAIL TRAIL CONCEPT PLAN COST ESTIMATE A preliminary opinion of probable cost has been prepared for the project, based on the level of design information and existing conditions data available at the time of the feasibility study. The estimate assumes two different levels of earthwork to fit the trail into the existing corridor: a simple section, where only a footprint of approximately twice the width of the trail is disturbed and minimal excavation and grading; and a complex footprint, which assumes a footprint of four times the trail width with greater excavation and filling requirements. These crosssections were developed for 10-foot and 12-foot wide trails using both asphalt and stone dust paving. Added to these basic trail construction costs were: The work required to make the bridges usable; Trail amenities such as trailheads, site furniture, wayfinding signage, fencing, and other improvements; Drainage and utility work; Improvements at road crossings; Track work for the realignments and other changes needed to complete the trail; and The on-road segments at the north and south ends of the trail. A summary of the major items is provided below; a more detailed breakdown of the estimate is attached as an appendix. The estimate also includes a number of multipliers to reflect the hard and soft costs of the total project as follows: Construction Escalation - 5% per year: This allows for inflation of costs due to the overall timeline for project delivery. Escalation is calculated at the midpoint of construction, which is assumed to be mid- to late-2019; hence 10% escalation has been applied to the total contract price. Engineering and Survey - 15%: include survey, geotechnical explorations and analysis and consultant fees for design, permitting, and construction phase services. General Contingency - 25%: This reflects the basis of the estimate; at this point, not much is known about the details of the design or the existing conditions because of the early stage of the project. The contingency should be reduced at each progressive stage of the design, ultimately being eliminated at the time of bidding. The total cost for the project, including the above multipliers, is currently estimated between $38 and $43 million (under review). 41

Page left intentionally blank 42

03 ACTION PLAN