AVALANCHE TERRAIN. Bill Glude Alaska Avalanche Specialists All photos and graphics Bill Glude unless otherwise noted.

Similar documents
Typical avalanche problems

Avalanche Awareness and Leading a Companion Rescue

2010 International Snow Science Workshop

NWAC Blog. Cornices - don't walk the line! Written by Robert Hahn on March 14, Last update on May 15, 2017.

American Avalanche Association Forest Service National Avalanche Center Avalanche Incident Report: Long Form

Twin Lakes Avalanche Incident 1/31/2016

Elevation Bands Description of terrain characteristics to which the avalanche danger ratings apply.

Morning Star Peak Avalanche Accident

SNOW AVALANCHE AVOIDANCE POLICY 2011

LEVEL 1 - AVALANCHE OVERVIEW HANDOUT

SYNOPSIS WEATHER AND SNOWPACK

ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS OF AVALANCHES: PRELIMINARY RESEARCH IN GLACIER NATIONAL PARK

Avalanche Safety Guidelines

Henderson Mountain Avalanche Accident Two riders caught, one partially buried, one fully buried

GLACIER STUDIES OF THE McCALL GLACIER, ALASKA

Avalanche Accident Report

Avalanche Safety Guidelines This guideline is intended as a general introduction to this topic.

Avalanche danger high in parts of NCW

Swede Creek Avalanche Incident Report Swede Creek, Whitefish Range, MT Date of Avalanche: 23 January 2016 Date of Site Visit: 24 January 2016

Slot Couloir Accident, Snoqualmie Mt

Excelsior Pass Avalanche Accident January 1, 2008

International Snow Science Workshop

2/16/2014 Idaho Frenchman Creek Published by Scott Savage, SAC

Proceedings, International Snow Science Workshop, Breckenridge, Colorado, 2016

In southern Upper Valais a very high avalanche danger will be encountered in some regions Edition: , 08:00 / Next update: 9.1.

Going-to-the-Sun Road, Glacier National Park, MT, USA Avalanche Path Atlas

Introduction to Safety on Glaciers in Svalbard

Twin Peaks Near Miss Report Turnagain Pass, Kenai Mountains, Alaska

Washington Explorer Search and Rescue Pierce County Unit February 2013

Proceedings, 2012 International Snow Science Workshop, Anchorage, Alaska

Example of the layout of a Fieldwork Atlas

Avalanche Mountain Incident March 4 th, 2017

Proceedings, International Snow Science Workshop, Breckenridge, Colorado, 2016

Proceedings, International Snow Science Workshop, Banff, 2014

Part 1: Introduction to Decision Making

Avalanche accident case study: Persistent buried weak layer in the Central Idaho Mountains

Glaciers. Clicker Question. Glaciers and Glaciation. How familiar are you with glaciers? West Greenland. Types of Glaciers.

Guidelines for Snow Avalanche Risk Determination and Mapping. David McClung University of British Columbia

Corona Bowl Avalanche Incident, December 6th, 2015

Number Caught: 2 Partially Buried, Non-Critical: 1 Partially Buried, Critical: 0 Fully Buried: 1 Injured: 1 Killed: 1

Kakadu Highlights No. 9: September 23 - October 6, 2018

APPENDIX D: SUSTAINABLE TRAIL DESIGN. APPENDICES Town of Chili Parks and Recreation Master Plan Update

Formation of a Corrie

PHYSICAL GEOGRAPHY GEOGRAPHY EARTH SYSTEMS COASTAL SYSTEMS FLUVIAL SYSTEMS

NivoTest : a personal assistant for avalanche risk assessment

Proceedings, International Snow Science Workshop, Breckenridge, Colorado, 2016 ANALYSIS OF UTAH AVALANCHE FATALITIES IN THE MODERN ERA

MP : the top of the bottom switchback

PERUVIAN ANDES ADVENTURES. EXPEDITION Climbing Alpamayo & Huascaran. PEAKS: Maparaju 5350m Alpamayo 5947m Huascaran Sur 6768m

Glaciers. Glacier Dynamics. Glacier Dynamics. Glaciers and Glaciation. Types of Glaciers. Chapter 15

Granite Mountain Avalanche Fatality, December 31st, 2015 Report prepared by NWAC

THE SME AVALANCHE TRAGEDY OF JANUARY 20, 2003: A SUMMARY OF THE DATA. Dick Penniman* Snowbridge Associates Frank Baumann Baumann Engineering

The Kendall Trap. Charlie Hagedorn

American Avalanche Association Forest Service National Avalanche Center Avalanche Incident Report: Short Form

Ski / Sled tracks as an expression of avalanche risk Jordy Hendrikx 1 & Jerry Johnson 2,1 1.

THRESHOLD GUIDELINES FOR AVALANCHE SAFETY MEASURES

Avalanches and the Mount Whitney Basin

Skyland Avalanche Saturday, February 25, 2012 Incident Report

White Horse. For your own safety warn the MCA Coastguard Helicopter (01305) They have been known to low fly in this area

Park Butte Avalanche Fatality March 10 th, 2018

Unit 1: Physical Environment Glaciated Landscapes

Twin Wildcat Lakes Avalanche Wednesday, February 1, 2012 Incident Report

TUPPER DESIGNATED ACCESS ROUTE

International Snow Science Workshop

Glaciers. Reading Practice

Axe and Saw Permit: Safe Use of Axes

Skiing and Snowshoes on Un-groomed Fernan Saddle Terrain

AVALANCHE FLOTATION DEVICES

a. The historic avalanche areas, or areas in which there exists clear evidence of previous avalanches, are mapped.

Glaciers. Glacier Dynamics. Glaciers and Glaciation. East Greenland. Types of Glaciers. Chapter 16

Dynamic Planet C Test

NORTH CASCADE SLACIER CLIMATE PROJECT Director: Dr. Mauri S. Pelto Department of Environmental Science Nichols College, Dudley MA 01571

Crystal Mountain Snow Safety Union Creek Avalanche Accident Report December 2, 2007

AN AVALANCHE CHARACTERIZATION CHECKLIST FOR BACKCOUNTRY TRAVEL DECISIONS. Roger Atkins* Canadian Mountain Holidays

glacier Little Ice Age continental glacier valley glacier ice cap glaciation firn glacial ice plastic flow basal slip Chapter 14

Region 1 Piney Woods

Dnigi Hut. Dnigi is Dnaina for Moose. Location:

Guthega to Mt Twynam. 2183m. 1583m. 6 hrs 45 mins 14.8 km Return. Experienced only. 913m

TRAIL MAINTENANCE AND CONSTRUCTION MANUAL

Lake Wissota Access Locations within the LaFayette Township. By Chad Martin

Proceedings, 2012 International Snow Science Workshop, Anchorage, Alaska

Avalanche Observations

American Conservation Experience

Red Tarn, Lake District They are all features of glacial erosion

Property access tracks

Tiger Mountain State Forest:

Shaping of North America. Physical Geography II of the United States and Canada. The Last Ice Age. The Ice Age. Pleistocene Polar Ice Cap 2/14/2013

BLASTING GLACIAL ICE AND SNOW ABSTRACT

FRANCE : HOW TO IMPROVE THE AVALANCHE KNOWLEDGE OF MOUNTAIN GUIDES? THE ANSWER OF THE FRENCH MOUNTAIN GUIDES ASSOCIATION. Alain Duclos 1 TRANSMONTAGNE

Hiking Las Vegas.com

Trail Phasing Plan. Note: Trails in the Clear Creek Canyon area (Segments will be finalized in the future to minimize wildlife impacts

Cottonwood Lake Avalanche Fatality February, 25th 2018

Wildland Fire Safety

Mearns Castle High School. Geography Department. Glaciated Landscapes

Erskine Creek via Pisgah Rock and Jack Evans

Leura Cascades to Gordon Falls Reserve

The Appleton Wetland; Its Decline, Cause and Recommended Action. Appendix K: Wetland Inspection

Chapter 16 Glaciers and Glaciations

Proceedings, 2012 International Snow Science Workshop, Anchorage, Alaska

National Pass. 893m. 665m. 3 hrs 30 mins 4.6 km Circuit. Hard track 773m. Blue Mountains National Park

Wentworth Pass. 893m. 535m. 4 hrs. Hard track 5.1 km Circuit. 692m

Transcription:

Bill Glude Alaska Avalanche Specialists 20111202 All photos and graphics Bill Glude unless otherwise noted. AVALANCHE TERRAIN The Key Questions 1.) Could the terrain produce an avalanche?! a.) Where you are?! b.) Above you? 2.) What would the consequences be? Path Characteristics Terms for parts of paths, see captioned photo at right. Unconfined and confined paths. Single or multiple starting zones. Path size - it s the small ones that catch most people, not the big obvious ones. Path History Human knowledge, history, observation. Debris. Vegetation clues: Unauthorized logging Tree damage Disaster species Dating slides by tree growth. Large forests slow but do not always stop big slides. Slope Angles Slope angle is the most important terrain factor. This graph shows prime time in the 30 to 45 range, but the data is skewed toward lower angles because most of it is from Intermountain and Continental snow climates. In Alaska, the peak is shifted to the right; prime time angles are 35 to 50 +. Slab Avalanche Frequency - Slope Angle 48 44 40 36 32 28 % 24 20 16 12 8 4 0 20-25 25-30 30-35 35-40 40-45 45-50 50-55 1 Series 1

If you are on flat or gentle terrain, are you in a runout zone? What is above you? At 12-14, slush flows can release in water-saturated snow. At 25º, slabs only release during periods of unusual instability. At 30º, slabs can release under a wider range of conditions. At 35-50 +, the slope angles are in the "prime time" range for large slabs in Alaska and other coastal and transitional climates. At 60º+, large slabs still release, but spindrift avalanches and sluffs start to dominate. Cliffs are unlikely to produce large slabs because they are too steep to hold much snow, but you must still watch the snow on lower-angle ledges and watch for hanging glacier ice. Runout, or Alpha Angles A handy way to estimate potential runout distance in the field, the runout angle is measured from the toe of the debris to the crown face, or the reverse. 25º - typical 20º - low, efficient avalanche 19 - lowest measured in SE Alaska ~12º - lowest measured Factors Influencing Runout Distance Long runouts: Smooth transition. Steep slope right to bottom. Channeled and concentrated flow. Short runouts: Flat landing, bellyflop onto the flats. Rough terrain. Sharp turns or obstacles. Unconfined flow that spreads out and dissipates. 2

Elevation Elevation is a key factor influencing: Snow type and quantity. Wind intensity. Precipitation type, snow level. Avalanche activity. Special Southeast Alaska notes: Though snow to sea level will help a slide maintain speed and volume, large avalanches don t really care if there is no snow in the lower track. They travel easily on bare ground. Avalanches can reach low elevations whenever conditions in their starting zones up high are suitable. This is hard to remember when all you see is rain and fog. The key question is What s going on up high where avalanches start?. Ground Conditions Smooth slopes, more prone to glide avalanches Grass. Tundra. Low bushes. Herbaceous plants. Rough slopes reduce glide, may help break up and support slabs until covered. Rocks. Tall bushes. Open trees. Beware, weaker faceted grains tend to form around rocks, bushes, and trees. They are often more functional as stress concentration or weak points than as so-called anchors. Forest Closed canopy helps stability because layers are discontinuous, broken up by tree wells, drips, tree plops, logs, and stumps. But closed canopy in dry climates with small-trunk, short branch trees can still produce large slabs. Open forest may just concentrate stress and makes far worse consequences if a slide does release. Trees open enough for you to travel easily are open enough for avalanches to travel easily, too. Being swept through trees is the major cause of avalanche trauma in North America. Glaciers Flow stresses are slow, probably insignificant. Crevasses and bergschrunds break the continuity of snow layers. Effects vary, but are usually secondary. The old snow surface or glacier ice can function as a bed surface, especially in the summer or late spring. Slope Configuration Convex profile areas are generally the most likely sections of a slope to release. Concave or straight profile sections may be less likely but the consequences are worse if you bring a slide down on you from the middle or bottom of the slope. Some unstable snow conditions, notably graupel and surface hoar, tend to be more pronounced in the hollows of the slope. 3

Aspect Aspect with respect to sun Shaded slopes tend to develop more surface hoar and faceted grains, weak snow types. Sunny slopes benefit in midwinter from moderate and more-uniform temperatures that tend to produce rounded grains, rapid bonding, and a stronger snowpack, but too much sun leads to sun crusts or wet slides as temperatures increase. Aspect with respect to wind Wind erosion reduces the load on potential weak layers in the snowpack. Windward, eroded areas generally are preferred ascent routes because they have less load, though those thin snowpack areas often develop weak faceted grains. Wind deposition loads slopes very rapidly and builds sensitive windslab. Sheltered lee slopes are easy to trigger when freshly loaded. Wind effects - cornices Cornices form from drifting snow building out over a slope change like a ridgetop or dropoff. They build straight out, then creep makes them sag down like a breaking wave. Cornices break More easily than you expect. Farther back than you expect. And faster than you expect. If you walk out to the edge of a snow-covered ridge, you are likely to be on the cornice even if there are rocks on both sides. Ridges usually scallop back between the rocks. You must have solid rock supporting you if you want to look over the edge. When approaching snow-covered ridges, assume there is a cornice there until you prove otherwise. Usually the ridge bends somewhere and allows a view over the edge from a solid slope. Cornice consequences include the fall when it breaks, the chunks of hard, heavy snow bouncing downhill, and their tendency to trigger the slopes they land on. Wind effects - reading wind direction from snow forms Depositional forms like drifts have their steep face downwind, to the lee. Erosional forms like sastrugi, the corrugated, rough snow surface in areas with high wind intensity, have their steep face upwind, to the windward. Mountain winds are strongly affected by topography, may eddy and change direction frequently. Check a number of wind clues before you decide, and keep reevaluating as you travel. Travel in low risk terrain during a windstorm to study how wind forms develop. 4

Consequences - Bad Consequence Spots and Terrain Traps Trees - the leading cause of traumatic avalanche injury and death in North America. Cliffs and rocks - second, but more chance of fatal injury than trees. Gullies and hollows - the third major terrain trap. Slopes lacking escape routes. Slopes lacking islands of safety. Abrupt transitions, road cuts. Creek beds. Water. Brush. Narrows or choke points. Crevasses. Bergschrunds. Ice. Multiple consequences. Consequences - Trees! Overall, roughly 10-15% of people completely buried in avalanches are dead from trauma.trauma accounts for about 30% of avalanche deaths. In Europe only 5-6% are killed by trauma. Most skiing is above treeline. In North America the trauma death rate is about 25%, 5 times the European rate. This is mostly due to trees. Studies in Canada show that 67% of avalanche trauma deaths there are from impacts with trees. In a Utah study, cliffs and rock bands were a distant second from trees as sources of traumatic injury, fewer in number but more likely to be fatal. Bottom line: Trees are very bad-consequence terrain! 5

Consequences - Avalanche Dynamics Slower-flowing avalanches tend to follow gullies, channels, and low spots. Faster powder and mixed motion avalanches tend to go straighter. Momentum prevails. Side slopes and double fall lines can take slides where you might not expect them to go. Evaluate micro-terrain carefully! Consequences - What You See in the Movies We work with some of the best athletes in the world when filming. They take risk management seriously. No one drops in casually. None of these pro s have a death wish! We evaluate consequences and snow stability with care. We spend hours safeguarding each shot. We seek well-supported cornices to jump, avoid the big overhanging ones. We plan for and manage our sluffs. And despite all our precautions, it is still a dangerous business. 6

Avalanche Terrain Classification 20080403 Draft, Adapted by Southeast Alaska Avalanche Center from Parks Canada Model Terrain Complexity Factors 1 Easy + 2 Moderate 0 3 Difficult - Route Options or Alternatives Numerous, terrain allows multiple choices. A selection of choices of varying exposure, options to avoid avalanche paths. Limited chances to reduce exposure, avoidance not possible. Slope Angle Angles generally < 30. Mostly low angle, isolated slopes > 35. Variable, with many > 35. Terrain Traps & Consequences Minimal, some creek slopes or cutbanks. Some depressions, gullies or hollows, and/or avalanche terrain above, trees, brush, cliffs, rocks, narrows creeks, or water with some good escape routes or islands of safety. Many depressions, gullies or hollows, cliffs, hidden slopes above gullies, cornices, trees, brush, cliffs, rocks, narrows, creeks, or water with few escape routes or islands of safety. Avalanche Frequency 30 year return, D2 size. Yearly for < D2 size. 3 year return for D2 size. Yearly for < D3 size. Yearly for D3 size. Interaction with Paths Runout zones only. Single path or paths with separation. Numerous and overlapping paths. Exposure Time None, or limited exposure crossing runouts only. Isolated exposure to start zones and tracks. Frequent exposure to start zones and tracks. Glaciation None or smooth. Generally smooth with isolated bands of crevasses. Start Zone Density Limited starting zone terrain. Some start zones; isolated avalanche paths leading to valley bottom. Broken or steep sections of crevasses, icefalls or serac exposure. Large expanses of start zones; multiple paths leading to valley bottom. Runout Zone Characteristics Solitary, well-defined areas, smooth transitions, spread deposits. Abrupt transitions or depressions with deep deposits. Multiple converging runout zones, confined depositions area, steep tracks overhead. Slope Shape Uniform. Some convexities. Convoluted. Notes: Terrain may fit into multiple classes. Consider all the variables and note that there are some default properties. Properties with a bold italicized descriptor automatically default into that or a higher terrain class. Nonitalicized descriptors are considered as carrying less weight. 7