Appendix 3. Greenway Design Standards. The Whitemarsh Township Greenway Plan

Similar documents
Port Gamble Shoreline Area Conceptual Trail Proposal

CHAPTER III: TRAIL DESIGN STANDARDS, SPECIFICATIONS & PERMITS

FEASIBILITY CRITERIA

City of Durango 5.8 FUNDING TRAILS DEVELOPMENT

Blueways: Rivers, lakes, or streams with public access for recreation that includes fishing, nature observation, and opportunities for boating.

COMMUNITY MEETING NOVEMBER 1, Wheaton Regional Park Pine Lake Trail

METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 390 North Robert Street, St. Paul, MN Phone (651) TDD (651)

MORGAN CREEK GREENWAY Final Report APPENDICES

Understanding user expectations And planning for long term sustainability 1

Citrus Heights Creek Corridor Trail Project Trail Advisory Group Field Trip #2 September 11, :00 11:00 am Trellis Hall, Citrus Heights

The Baker/Carver Regional Trail is intended to

2. Goals and Policies. The following are the adopted Parks and Trails Goals for Stillwater Township:

AGENDA ITEM 5 D WAKULLA ENVIRONMENTAL INSTITUTE (WEI) TRAIL FEASIBILITY STUDY

Business Item No

Lake Apopka Trail Loop Design Guidelines

ROAD AND TRAIL PROJECT APPROVAL

MPRB: Southwest LRT Community Advisory Committee Issues and Outcomes by Location Current to: 12 November 2010

Chapter 6: POLICY AND PROCEDURE RECOMMENDATIONS

10.3 TRAIL DESIGN STANDARDS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT REPORT PURPOSE EXISTING SETTING EXPANDING PARKLAND

CHAPTER 5. Chapter 5 Recreation Element

Assessing Your Trails, Keeping Them Safe and Enjoyable

Dryden Rail Trail Friends and Task Force Monday, January 21, :00 9:00 p.m. Dryden Town DPW 61 East Main Street, Dryden

FINCH HYDRO CORRIDOR TRAIL PROJECT

National Forests and Grasslands in Texas

PIONEER PARK. City of Des Peres Parks Master Plan. SWT Design 46 INTRODUCTION

Non-motorized Trail Plan & Proposal. August 8, 2014

Blue River Trail Master Plan JSA to Town Hall June 2004

River Parks Trail: Tulsa, Oklahoma

Auburn Trail / Ontario Pathways Trail Connector Feasibility Study Public Information Meeting Wednesday, August 22, 2012

Trails Classification Steering Team Alberta Tourism, Parks and Recreation Alberta Sustainable Resource Development Alberta TrailNet Society

Jefferson County Non-Motorized Transportation and Recreational Trails Plan 2010

Longmont to Boulder Regional Trail Jay Road Connection DRAFT FINAL REPORT

Procedure for the Use of Power-Driven Mobility Devices on Mass Audubon Sanctuaries 1 September 17, 2012

Outdoor Developed Areas

What s covered. What s not covered. Options for those not covered. ABA Coverage

Permeable RECREATIONAL TRAILS

Table of Contents. page 3 Long term Goals Project Scope Project History. 4 User Groups Defined Trail Representative Committee. 5 Trail Users Breakdown

Trails Technical Committee

DATE: 23 March, 2011 TO: Communities FROM: BlazeSports America. RE: Accessible Trails Checklist 1

Logo Department Name Agency Organization Organization Address Information 5700 North Sabino Canyon Road

Buena Vista Community Trails Plan

Regional Wayfinding Sign Strategy Thurston County Trails 2017

BRACEVILLE NATURE PRESERVE Introductions History Present Conditions Future Development Plans Implementation Strategies Statistics

Aspen Skiing Company Policy for Use of Other Power-Driven Mobility Devices And Service Animals

Kelly Motorized Trails Project Proposed Action

ALBANY-HUDSON ELECTRIC TRAIL FEASIBILITY STUDY. Final Report OCTOBER 2011

Saanich Parks and Recreation Trail Guidelines 2007

Georgetown-Lewes Rail/Trail Study. Rail/Trail Study: Cool Spring to Cape Henlopen State Park New Road Extension (House Resolution No.

Tallahassee-St. Marks Historic Railroad Trail

Rating: 5.0 (scale of 1-10)

Design Considerations For Accessible Parks & Trails

Lake Myra County Park. Wake County, North Carolina Community Forum #2 June 12, 2008

Trail Feasibility Study

Hudson Highlands Fjord Trail Draft Master Plan. April 29, 2015

$866,000. $1,400,000 Health Benefits $13,156,000 TOTAL ANNUAL DIRECT BENEFITS. $10,890,000 Economic Benefits

Chapter 6. Trail Design. Trail Design

A summary of Draft Makara Peak Mountain Bike Park Master Plan

FINAL TESTIMONY 1 COMMITTEE ON RESOURCES UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES. July 13, 2005 CONCERNING. Motorized Recreational Use of Federal Lands

West Orange Trail. Clean, Green, Fun!

DRAFT - APRIL 13, 2007 ROUTING STUDY FOR TRAIL CONNECTIONS BETWEEN CALAIS AND AYERS JUNCTION

Mt. Hood National Forest

Trail # NW Tuesday, June DESIGN. Provide an Review the Provide an. Project Goals: System system. wayfinding

Fossil Creek Wild & Scenic River Comprehensive River Management Plan Forest Service Proposed Action - details March 28, 2011

RUSHMORE CONNECTOR TRAIL PROPOSAL

TOWNSHIP OF WILMOT TRAILS MASTER PLAN Appendix B: Implementation Plan

THOMAS A. SWIFT METROPARK Introductions History Present Conditions Future Development Plans Implementation Strategies Statistics

Brampton, Ontario REQ. no.: PLANNING, DESIGN & DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE

Wilds. Headwaters. Lakes. Oxbows. Falls

Welcome to the future of Terwillegar Park a Unique Natural Park

The following trails completed their work utilizing funds awarded by the Greenways Foundation:

Subj: POLICY FOR MAINSIDE TRAIL USE AT MARINE CORPS BASE QUANTICO

3. COLTA / HUGA CONNECTIONS - PRELIMINARY

Deschutes River Trail Action Plan

APPENDIX OFFICIAL MAP ORDINANCE OF HAMILTONBAN TOWNSHIP OFFICIAL MAP NARRATIVE

DRAFT FINAL ACCESSIBILITY GUIDELINES FOR OUTDOOR DEVELOPED AREAS

Becker County Trail Routing Feasibility Study

Birthplace of the Oil Industry Trail Town Crawford County, Pennsylvania. for the Titusville Redevelopment Authority.

Appendix A Appendix A (Project Specifications) Auk Auk / Black Diamond (Trail 44) Reroute

TRUCKEE TAHOE AIRPORT DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTOR STAFF REPORT

Park Design and Location Criteria

Community Development Committee

Policies, Guidelines, and Standards for Trails in Alberta Highway Rights-of-way

Rule Governing the Designation and Establishment of All-Terrain Vehicle Use Trails on State Land

Segment 2: La Crescent to Miller s Corner

Bike/Pedestrian/Golf Cart Trail Recommendations for the City of Dasher

chapter - Hex Highway Touring Route Hamburg to Strausstown Overview

Continental Divide National Scenic Trail Legislative History and Planning Guidance

Section 3.6 Recreation

Flow Stand Up Paddle Board Parkway Plan Analysis

Understanding the caring capacity of the visitor experience Provide facilities to support a high level user experience Address visual quality through

Dungeness Recreation Area County Park Master Plan

MASTER PLAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

I. INTRODUCTION EAST COAST GREENWAY STUDY PURPOSE

Silver Lake Park An Environmental Jewel for the Citizens of Prince William County

Wallace Falls State Park Classification and Management Planning Stage 3 Preliminary Recommendations July 18, 2018 Sultan City Hall

Classifications, Inventory and Level of Service

Proposal to Redevelop Lower Kananaskis River-Barrier Lake. Bow Valley Provincial Park. Frequently Asked Questions

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION

Welcome to the Cross County Trail Public Input Session!

Transcription:

Appendix 3 Greenway Design Standards This chapter discusses two design standards for the greenway types discussed above. First, trail design standards are presented together with trailhead facilities and their typical design features. Second, riparian design standards are also discussed for resource protection and conservation greenways. Trail Design Standards The Township is currently preparing a comprehensive trail plan for the community. Insofar as trails will be part of some of the Township s greenways, they are discussed here. Table 3A summarizes trail construction standards for several kinds of trail facilities. Several different kinds of trails will be needed within the Township greenway system depending on the greenway type and surrounding conditions. Several issues are involved with trail design, including adjacent land uses, terrain, land cover, and user types. Trail User Types Trail design affects the level of trail use and the recreational activities it can support. Trails are used by many types of people: young, old, physically fit and those that are less active, parents with young children, people using wheelchairs, people riding horseback or bicycles, people engaging in strenuous exercise and those just taking a leisurely stroll. All of these trail users should be accommodated on the trails within Whitemarsh Township s greenway system. Typical trail users and activities are described below. Design specifications needed by individual user types are discussed in the next section.13 Pedestrians Pedestrians include runners, walkers, and in-line skaters. As stated above, this includes people of all ages and abilities, from seniors to the very young. Pedestrian speeds vary greatly, which can affect trail design parameters, with in-line skaters moving at greater speeds than runners and walkers. Pedestrians with baby strollers and dogs are a subset of pedestrian trail users. Bicyclists Bicyclists include those riding road/racing bicycles, those riding mountain and hybrid bicycles, and those riding with small children. Road/racing bicyclists tend to move more quickly than those riding mountain and hybrid bicycles. Families that are riding with young children tend to move along the trail more slowly than road and mountain bicyclists, and may require more areas to pull off to the side of the trail. Young children 13 At the time of preparation of this Plan, the Township was also working with a consultant to prepare a Township Trail Master Plan, the recommendations of which should be followed by the Township with regard to trail alignment and design.. 8/16/2007 41

may ride on a cart attached to an adult bicycle, or they may ride their own bicycle, tricycle or scooter. Many mountain bikers seek the more challenging ride provided by off-road, natural trails, rather than more formal paved trails. Americans with Disabilities Act Wheelchair users must also be accommodated on trails, and trails must be designed for their access and safe use. Trails must be designed in accordance with the accessibility standards of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) which addresses issues such as trail access, grades, and surface material, while the converse is true for most road/racing bicyclists. Equestrians Horseback riders should be accommodated on the less urban portions and park sections of Whitemarsh Township s greenway system. Horses prefer a softer surface as opposed to stone or asphalt. On paved trail sections open to pedestrian and bicycle use, equestrians can utilize the grassed shoulder to avoid slipping on pavement, causing pavement damage, and to reduce conflicts with bicyclists and pedestrians. Areas of the trail systems appropriate for horses will be determined in the Township s Trail Master Plan. General Trail Design Guidelines General trail types and design standards are discussed below. The Pennsylvania Greenway Partnership offers the following general design guidelines for trail construction: Design trails with adequate lines of sight Design methods to control access such as gates Design security lighting for buildings and access points, and Determine environmentally sensitive areas and habitats and cultural features. For urban, non-motorized trails The Pennsylvania Greenway Partnership recommends the following: Design trails to be consistent with existing neighborhood character Include as many access points as possible Incorporate multiple transportation modes Design social gathering areas Provide a sense or security and aesthetics Consider stormwater management and urban stream restoration in designs Design for multiple uses, and Design to accommodate maintenance vehicles14 Areas with sensitive environmental features such as wetlands require specialized design which may include the construction of boardwalks or footbridges to protect the area and still provide connectivity. 14 Creating Connections, The Pennsylvania Greenways Partnership, 1998, p. 65. 8/16/2007 42

Shoulder Running Cross Slope Agency Tread Width Width Surface Material Slope Shared, Multi-Use Trail: Bicyclists, In-line skaters, walkers, runners, wheelchairs & strollers Vertical Clearance AASHTO 10' 2' Paved or fine aggregates 5% (1:20) 2% (1:50) 6'-6" BC 6'-8' 1'-2' Crusher fines 4% N/A MCPC 12' 2'-5' Asphalt, macadam, or cinders Pathway: Walkers, runners, wheelchairs & strollers 5% 1% 8'-10' MCPC 6' 2' Cinder/macadam 1%-5% 1%-2% 10' Bike Lane: Bicycles only AASHTO 3'-5'* 4' Macadam N/A N/A N/A BC 5' N/A Macadam N/A N/A 8' MCPC 4'-6' 6'-8' Macadam N/A N/A N/A AASHTO: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, BC: Brandywine Conservancy, MCPC: Montgomery County Planning Commission. *Depends on off-street parking Table 3A: Comparison of Trail Design Standards Other general trail design elements to be considered include: the installation of gates at trailhead areas bollards to slow bicycle speeds, especially in high trail traffic areas crosswalks and signage at all road crossings landscaping and shade trees benches and trash receptacles wayfinding, directional and cautionary signage, for trail users and drivers pull off areas, and safety fencing along steep slopes. Multi-Use Recreational Trails The Montgomery County Planning Commission (MCPC) defines a multi-use trail as A trail that permits more than one user group (jogger, bicyclist, hiker, etc.) at a time, creating a two-way shared use area. The trail is constructed of a hard paved surface or hard compacted cinder to facilitate wheeled or pedestrian traffic.15 Trail tread widths vary between 6 feet to twelve feet, with between one-foot and five-foot shoulders. Gravel/cinder or crusher fine trails provide a hard surface but typically cost more to maintain than asphalt paved trails. If not properly maintained, cinder trails can develop potholes and weed infiltration. Asphalt paved trails typically cost more to construct but need less maintenance. Asphalt or macadam trails are typically the easiest surface for wheelchairs and in-line skaters to navigate, but are not well-suited for horses. Multi-use trails may vary in their design as to width and surface material. Design standards are influenced not only by user types, but also by adjacent land uses, setting, land cover and terrain. Multi-use trail tread widths typically range from eight feet to 15 Guidelines for Trail Development within Montgomery County, Pennsylvania, MCPC, p. 4. 8/16/2007 43

twelve feet, depending on anticipated levels of use, types of users, and location. Grassed, maintained shoulder widths vary from two feet to five feet per side, with four to five feet being desirable according to the MCPC.16 Pathways The MCPC also defines another type of trail facility, pathways, as a temporary or permanent area that is normally dirt or cinder although some areas are asphalt or concrete. A pathway typically indicates the common route taken by pedestrians between two locations.17 Pathways may serve as connectors to multi-use trails or may be constructed within parks, residential developments and smaller-scale trail projects. Other trail facilities that may be implemented within the Township s greenway system include sidewalk retrofitting, which involves widening existing sidewalks to more safely accommodate two-way pedestrian traffic, and the construction of on-road bicycle facilities, including bike lanes and bike routes. A primitive or natural trail may be desired in areas such as meadows or woodlands where natural resource preservation is desired. The surface of a primitive or natural trail may consist of a mowed or dirt footpath. Trailheads Trailheads are areas where trails can be accessed from adjacent land. Depending on their intended function, trailheads and may provide a full range of support facilities and amenities or only a few. Trailheads can be described as primary or secondary and are described below. Primary Trailheads Primary trailheads are typically trailheads that are anticipated to have higher trail user numbers and provide a wider array of support facilities and amenities than do secondary trailheads. Standard facilities included at a primary trailhead include: ADA accessible parking areas, without or without lighting ADA accessible restrooms Stub trails leading to the main trail Gate at the beginning of the trail to block unauthorized vehicles Information kiosks containing mapping and trail related information Wayfinding and directional signage Picnic areas, benches and trash receptacles Water fountains Bicycle racks, and Landscaping and shade trees. 16 When a municipality enters the County s Green Fields/Green Towns program and applies for the County Trail Connection Grant Option, the municipality will be required to meet county trail guidelines. 17 Guidelines for Trail Development within Montgomery County, Pennsylvania, MCPC, p. 4. 8/16/2007 44

Primary trailheads may or may not be located within an existing or proposed park. Parks make excellent places to establish primary trailheads because they may already provide many of the needed facilities and amenities. The number of parking spaces to be provided depends on the average daily number of anticipated trail users and site constraints. Secondary Trailheads Secondary trailheads are those that may serve lower numbers of trail users, may be located in more remote areas along the trail, or are simply limited by the size of the tract to be used for the trailhead. Secondary trailheads may consist only of a gate, an informal parking area and signage marking the trail access point. Riparian Buffer Standards Riparian buffer greenways primarily serve conservation and resource protection functions and therefore should remain in or be restored as close to their natural states as possible. Riparian buffer greenways may include trail facilities, the design of which may vary in terms of width and construction materials. Trail design is also affected depending on the existing conditions of the buffer area. Forested riparian buffers may also be developed solely on private lands, providing no public access. In these cases, the purpose of the buffer is to provide environmental function. Riparian buffer width may vary according to existing land uses and the general setting of the area, i.e., urban, suburban, rural, etc. Typical riparian buffers range from 50 feet to 300 feet from the edge of the waterway, with 50 feet being appropriate for more urban areas and 300 feet being appropriate for rural areas. Chester County s water resources plan Watersheds includes this description of a typical riparian buffer: To be most effective, riparian buffers should include three zones. The streamside zone should include natural, undisturbed trees and bushes that provide shade and detritus to the stream, and root masses that stabilize stream banks and channels. The second zone is a managed forest zone with trees and shrubs that provide pollution filtering and uptake through the roots of the plants, as well as infiltration. The third or upland zone includes grasses and features to slow and disperse the runoff as it enters the buffer and filters sediments and pollutants.18 Figure 3A on the following page shows the three sections of a typical 100-foot wide riparian buffer, consisting of a 35-foot wide undisturbed forest adjacent to the edge of the stream channel, followed by a 45-foot wide managed forest area (the widest section), and a 20-foot wide grassed area. 18 Watersheds, Chester County Water Resources Authority, 2002, p. 33. 8/16/2007 45

Figure 3A: Riparian Buffer Cross-Section 19 Recommended riparian buffer widths depend in part on the desired function of buffer, as shown in Figure 3B. Variation in buffer width needed to accomplish various environmental goals, ranging from water temperature moderation to wildlife habitat preservation. Sediment removal, flood mitigation and wildlife habitat preservation require the most buffer land, from 200 feet to almost 300 feet. Figure 3B: Desired Buffer Function and Minimum Buffer Width (Linear Feet) 20 Depending on the desired function(s), the width of a riparian buffer may vary along stream sections. The Montgomery County Comprehensive Plan 2025 provides the follow principles to follow regarding riparian buffer areas: Forest riparian buffer corridors should be maintained and reforestation should be encouraged where there are no wooded buffers The riparian corridor should be uninterrupted so reduce concentrated stream flows and provide continuous habitat for the passage of animals 19 Watersheds, Chester County Water Resources Authority, 2002, p. 33. 20 Watersheds, Chester County Water Resources Authority, 2002, p. 34. 8/16/2007 46

Riparian corridors should extend at least 75 from the edge of the stream for optimal performance, consisting of an undisturbed forest to provide shade followed by managed woodlands Recreation within the riparian buffer should be balanced with the impact it may have upon existing natural features and, Generally the riparian buffer should remain in its natural state. Minor landscaping to reduce concentrated flow and the removal of exotic plant species should be permitted.21 Whitemarsh Township s Riparian Corridor Conservation District Zoning Ordinance (Article XXXV) contains riparian corridor design requirements, described in Table 3B below. For perennial and intermittent streams, the ordinance requires a minimum riparian buffer area of 150 feet within two zones, plus the width of the stream. The ordinance also requires the reestablishment of forest cover and woodland habitat within required buffer areas. This overlay district is not currently shown on the Township s Zoning Map. Table 3B: Riparian Corridor Conservation District Ordinance Design Requirements Corridor Width Stream Type Zone 1 Zone 2 Perennial Minimum Width: 25' from edge of watercourse. Minimum Width: 50' from outer edge of Zone 1, or equal to the extent of the 100-year floodplain, or 25' beyond outer edge of wetland margin, whichever is greater. Total minimum width of Zones 1 and 2 = 150' plus stream width. Intermittent Minimum Width: 25' from edge of watercourse. Minimum Width: 50' from outer edge of Zone 1, or equal to the extent of the 100-year floodplain, or 25' beyond outer edge of wetland margin, whichever is greater. Total minimum width of Zones 1 and 2 = 150' plus stream width. Wetlands & Waterbodies Minimum Width: 25' from edge of wetland or water body. Zone 2: Does not apply 21 The Montgomery County Comprehensive Plan 2025, Montgomery County Planning Commission, 2005, pp. 44-43. 8/16/2007 47