Source: Chippewa Valley Regional Airport ASOS, Period of Record

Similar documents
1.1.3 Taxiways. Figure 1-15: Taxiway Data. DRAFT Inventory TYPICAL PAVEMENT CROSS-SECTION LIGHTING TYPE LENGTH (FEET) WIDTH (FEET) LIGHTING CONDITION

CATCODE ] CATCODE

DRAFT MASTER PLAN UPDATE

APPENDIX C AIRSPACE PROCEDURES

Chapter 4 Airport Facility Requirements

OVERVIEW BASIC DESIGN FACTORS. Demand Determinants

GLOSSARY A.1 ABBREVIATIONS/ACRONYMS

50 Ways to Improve Your Airport: Engaging Airport Management on Key Issues

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND

MetroAir Virtual Airlines

Chapter 9 - AIRPORT SYSTEM DESIGN

Chippewa-Eau Claire Metropolitan Planning Area Long Range Transportation Plan


Hartford-Brainard Airport Potential Runway Closure White Paper

Navigation - Runways. Chap 2, Nolan

SUMMARY OF QUANTITES NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY DRAWING NUMBER TITLE GENERAL ELECTRICAL

APPENDIX A GLOSSARY. A series of external FAA publications consisting of all non-regulatory material of a policy, guidance, and informational nature.

Actual Runway Length: The length of full-width, usable runway from end to end or full strength pavement where those runways are paved

1 DRAFT. General Aviation Terminal Services Aircraft Hangars Aircraft Parking Aprons Airport Support Facilities

CHAPTER 5 - FACILITY REQUIREMENTS

Airport Layout Plan Narrative Report

CHAPTER 3 ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED

Acronyms. Airport Layout Plan Report Appendix A A-1

Chapter 4 Airport Capacity Assessment and Identification of Facility Needs

AIRPORTS There are two types of airport environments: controlled and uncontrolled. A controlled airport has an operating control tower, staffed by

BELFAST MUNICIPAL AIRPORT OVERVIEW

Chapter 4 Airport Facility Requirements. Introduction

MASTER PLAN REPORT REPORT PREPARED BY:

DEPARTMENT: CIVIL ENGINEERING SEMESTER: III SUBJECT CODE / Name: CE2303/ Railway, Airport and Harbors Engineering 2 MARK QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

TECHNICAL REPORT #7 Palm Beach International Airport Airport Layout Plan

Appendix C AIRPORT LAYOUT PLANS

Glossary of Terms Used In Airport Master Planning

CHAPTER 3 FACILITY REQUIREMENTS

4.0 FACILITY REQUIREMENTS

CHAPTER 1 BACKGROUND AND PROPOSED ACTION

CHAUTAUQUA COUNTY/ DUNKIRK AIRPORT

CHAPTER D Capacity Analysis and Facility Requirements INTRODUCTION

Inventory of Existing Conditions.

Demand Capacity and Facility Requirements

Runway and Taxiway Marking

CE 563 Airport Design

Airport Master Plan. Brookings Regional Airport. Runway Runway 17-35

BELLINGHAM INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT. Appendix A. Glossary. Prepared by: Leibowitz & Horton AMC JUB Engineers, Inc.

Facility Requirements

Chapter Six ALP Drawings. Tacoma Narrows Airport. Master Plan Update

TECHNICAL REPORT #3 Palm Beach International Airport Demand/Capacity and Facility Requirements

ABOVE GROUND LEVEL. The elevation of a point or surface above the ground. ACCELERATE STOP DISTANCE AVAILABLE (ASDA). See declared distances

Chapter Three AIRPORT FACILITY REQUIREMENTS/ALTERNATIVES

Consideration will be given to other methods of compliance which may be presented to the Authority.

Tallahassee International Airport Master Plan. Technical Advisory Committee Meeting #2 October 19, 2016

Gleim Private Pilot Syllabus Fifth Edition, 3rd Printing Updates March 2016

FACILITY REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY OF KEY ISSUES OVERVIEW

Chapter 4 Facility Requirements

Airport Master Plan for Montgomery-Gibbs Executive Airport PAC Meeting #3

R FAA

Appendix A - Glossary

Study Committee Meeting. September 2015

According to FAA Advisory Circular 150/5060-5, Airport Capacity and Delay, the elements that affect airfield capacity include:

Part 1 DEFINITIONS AND ABBREVIATIONS. CONSOL or CONSOLAN means a kind of low or medium frequency long range navigational aid.

Chapter 3 FACILITY REQUIREMENTS

4.0 FACILITY REQUIREMENTS

The purpose of this Demand/Capacity. The airfield configuration for SPG. Methods for determining airport AIRPORT DEMAND CAPACITY. Runway Configuration

Section 3: Demand/Capacity Analysis and Facility Requirements

THE VILLAGES AVIATION CLUB. SAFETY BRIEF November 2016

TERMINAL PROCEDURES PUBLICATION SYMBOLS

AERONAUTICAL SURVEYS & INSTRUMENT FLIGHT PROCEDURES

Chapter 4.0 Facility Requirements

Airport Master Plan for. Brown Field Municipal Airport PAC Meeting #3

Yellowstone Regional Airport Operational Capability Assessment

CHAPTER FOUR. Airport Facility Requirements. Introduction Page 4-2. Airfield Capacity Analysis Page 4-2. Skylark Field Airport Airport Master Plan

AIRPORT LAYOUT PLAN FOR FRIEDMAN MEMORIAL REPLACEMENT AIRPORT - SITE 12 FRIEDMAN MEMORIAL AIRPORT AUTHORITY INDEX OF SHEETS SHEET TITLE

Table of Contents. Overview Objectives Key Issues Process...1-3

chapter 5 Recommended Master Plan Concept airport master plan MASTER PLAN CONCEPT

Airport Obstruction Standards

4.0 AIRFIELD CAPACITY & FACILITY REQUIREMENTS

DATE OF AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY:

DRAFT Rock Springs Sweetwater Country Airport Master Plan

3 INTRODUCTION. Chapter Three Facility Requirements. Facility Requirements PEAKING CHARACTERISTICS

Chapter Baseline Conditions

AD 2. AERODROMES VAKS AD 2.2 AERODROME GEOGRAPHICAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE DATA

6.1 INTRODUCTION 6.2 AIRSIDE ALTERNATIVES NORTH PERRY AIRPORT MASTER PLAN UPDATE RUNWAY LENGTH REQUIREMENTS SECTION 6: ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS

Chapter 5 Airport Facility Requirements

Master Plan Final Report

AIRCRAFT INCIDENT REPORT

a. Aeronautical charts DID THIS IN LESSON 2

FACILITY REQUIREMENTS 5.1 Introduction

THE VILLAGES AVIATION CLUB. November 2014 SAFETY BRIEF

Merritt Island Airport

AIRPORT FACILITY REQUIREMENTS

Pierre Regional Airport Airport Master Plan. Kickoff Meeting April 7, 2017

Basic Design Factors. Airfield Design. Airport Role

Airport Operations. Chapter 14. Introduction. Airport Categories

5.0 ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS

CHAPTER 2 INVENTORY EXISTING CONDITIONS 2.1 AIRFIELD FACILITIES Airspace

2007 Instrument Procedures Handbook; Chapter 5 Approach

AERODROME LIGHTING SYSTEM

5.1 Approach Hazards Awareness - General

Instrument Proficiency Check Flight Record

Chapter 2: Existing Facilities

AIRPORT FACILITY REQUIREMENTS

Transcription:

Chapter 1 Inventory Runway wind coverage is the percentage of time a runway can be used without exceeding allowable crosswind velocities. Allowable crosswind velocities vary depending on aircraft size and speed, and are generally grouped into four allowable crosswind components: 10.5, 13, 16, and 20 knots. During periods of high crosswinds, traffic maybe diverted from the affected runway to a crosswind runway. Table 1-8 presents individual and combined wind coverage percentages for the two runways at EAU for all-weather, instrument flight rules (IFR), and visual flight rules (VFR) conditions. As shown in the table, Runway 4/22 is the crosswind-preferred runway for IFR operations, while Runway 14/32 is the crosswind-preferred runway for all-weather and VFR conditions, particularly for smaller aircraft. Table 1-8: Runway Wind Coverage Runway 10.5 knots 13 knots 16 knots 20 knots All Weather Runway 4/22 90.89% 95.30% 98.98% 99.83% Runway 14/32 93.19% 96.70% 99.26% 99.85% Combined 98.80% 99.72% 99.96% 100.00% Instrument Flight Rules Runway 4/22 94.09% 96.97% 99.29% 99.87% Runway 14/32 92.77% 96.17% 98.99% 99.76% Combined 98.91% 99.72% 99.95% 99.99% Visual Flight Rules Runway 4/22 90.54% 95.12% 98.94% 99.83% Runway 14/32 93.16% 96.72% 99.28% 99.85% Combined 98.78% 99.72% 99.96% 100.00% Source: Chippewa Valley Regional Airport ASOS, Period of Record 2000-2009 EAU has an extensive taxiway system that supports aircraft operations by connecting the runways to the aircraft parking aprons and hangar areas. Table 1-9 presents designations, widths, orientations, and functions for all existing taxiways at EAU. Table 1-9: EAU Taxiway and Major Taxilane Information Designation Width Orientation Function A 50' NE/SW Southeastern full-length, partially-parallel taxiway to Runway 4/22 A1 thru A6 65'/50 NW/SE Connector taxiways between Runway 4/22 and Taxiway A B 50' E/W Connector taxiway between Runway 14/32, Taxiway A, Taxiway C, and the commercial aircraft apron C 50'/40' NW/SE Northeastern full-length, fully-parallel taxiway to Runway 14/32 C1 thru C4 50'/40' NE/SW Connector taxiways between Runway 14/32 and Taxiway A Connector taxiway between Runway 4/22 and the commercial aircraft D 65' NW/SE apron E 50' NW/SE Southwestern partial-length parallel taxiway to Runway 14/32 F 50' E/W Provides access to south GA hangar area from Taxiways A and E Taxilane Alpha TBD NE/SW Provides access to and from apron and hangar areas to Taxiway A Taxilane Bravo TBD E/W Provides access to and from apron and hangar areas to Taxiways B and C Source: Airport Layout Plan; Airport As-Built Drawings Notes: Taxiways A4 and A6 are each 65 feet wide, while Taxiways A1, A2, A3, and A5 are each 50 feet wide Taxiway C is 50 feet wide southeast of Taxiway C2, and 35 feet wide northwest of Taxiway C2 Taxiway C1 is 50 feet wide, while Taxiways C2, C3, and C4 are each 40 feet wide Chippewa Valley Regional Airport Master Plan (May 2013) 1-22

Chapter 1 Inventory 1.3.3 Design Surfaces Airport design surfaces are established by the FAA to provide for safe aircraft operations in accordance with Advisory Circular (AC) 150/5300-13A, Airport Design, and to prevent obstructions that are hazardous to aircraft navigation. This section describes four of these surfaces with regard to EAU: the runway safety area (RSA), the runway object free area (ROFA), the runway protection zone (RPZ), and the precision obstacle free zone (POFZ). This section also provides a brief overview of imaginary surfaces established by Federal Aviation Regulations (FAR) Part 77 and AC 150/5300-13A. According to AC 150/5300-13A, the RSA enhances the safety of airplanes which undershoot, overrun, or veer off the runway, and provides greater accessibility for firefighting and rescue equipment during such incidents. The ROFA is for clearing of above-ground objects non-essential to air navigation or aircraft ground maneuvering. The RPZ enhances protection of people and property on the ground. The POFZ, applicable to runway ends with precision instrument approach procedures, protects aircraft on approach in instrument conditions by clearing taxiing and parked airplanes and other object penetrations. Under Federal grant assurances, EAU is obligated to provide a safe operating environment by maintaining the runways, taxiways, and associated design surfaces. Figure 1-11 presents a graphical view of the four main design surfaces under consideration for Runway 4/22 and Runway 14/32. Table 1-10 provides an overview of the design surface dimensions. Table 1-10: Airport Design Surfaces Runway Surface Length Width Runway 4/22 Runway 14/32 RSA 1,000' 500' ROFA 1,000' 800' RWY 4 RPZ 1,700 1,000' (inner), 1,510' (outer) RWY 22 RPZ 2,500 1,000 (inner), 1,750 (outer) POFZ (both ends) 200 800 RSA 300' 150' ROFA 300' 500' RPZ (both ends) 1,000 500' (inner), 700' (outer) Source: FAA AC 150/5300-13A, Airport Design Note: RSA and ROFA lengths represent the length beyond the runway end. FAR Part 77 establishes imaginary surfaces to define and protect against airspace obstructions. Imaginary surfaces are conceptual safety planes surrounding an airport. FAR Part 77 includes clearance requirements for primary, approach, transitional, conical, and horizontal surfaces. Figure 1-12 presents plan and three-dimensional isometric views of typical Part 77 surfaces. Similar to Part 77 surfaces, AC 150/5300-13A defines surfaces required for siting runway ends that protect both approach and departure operations. Chippewa Valley Regional Airport Master Plan (May 2013) 1-23

Source Information: FAR Part 77 Figure 1-12 Part 77 Plan and Isometric View PREPARED BY: MASTER PLAN CHIPPEWA VALLEY REGIONAL AIRPORT (EAU) EAU CLAIRE/CHIPPEWA FALLS, WI May 2013 1-25

Chapter 1 Inventory 1.3.4 Electronic and Visual Navigational Aids Electronic and visual navigational aids provide pilots with flight planning, airport identification, approach, and landing guidance information during both visual and instrument weather conditions. EAU has numerous navigational aids on and off its airfield. Navigational aids at EAU include the runway edge and approach lighting systems identified in Table 1-6 (see Section 1.3.2). Runway edge lighting systems allow pilots to identify the edges of the usable runway pavement surfaces during periods of low visibility and at night. Runway 4/22 is equipped with a high intensity runway edge lighting (HIRL) system, which is the standard runway edge lighting system for precision instrument runways. Runway 14/32 is equipped with medium intensity runway edge lighting (MIRL), which is the preferred runway edge lighting system for non-precision instrument runways. An approach lighting system is a configuration of lights arranged symmetrically around the extended runway centerline, which provides visual information on runway alignment, height perception, roll guidance, runway end identification, and reference to the horizon. Runway 22 is equipped with a medium intensity approach lighting system with runway alignment indicator lights (MALSR). When combined with the existing localizer and glideslope antenna infrastructure installed for Runway 22, the MALSR allows for a standard Category 1 (CAT-I) instrument landing system (ILS) approaches to Runway 22 (see Section 1.3.5 for additional information). Runway 4 and Runway 14 are both equipped with runway end identifier lights (REILs). REILs consist of two synchronized flashing lights, one on each side of the landing threshold, which provide rapid and positive identification of a runway end during approaches and landings. This type of system is recommended for runways with only circling or non-precision straight-in instrument approach procedures. All four runways are equipped with precision approach path indicator (PAPI) lighting units, which provide pilots on approach to the runway with visual glide slope information to assure a stabilized approach to the touchdown point. A very high frequency omnidirectional range and tactical navigation (VORTAC) beacon is located approximately 1.5 miles north the airfield at EAU, on the other side of the Chippewa River. The call sign for the VORTAC is EAU, it can be accessed on the 112.9 frequency, and it is referred to as the Eau Claire VORTAC. VORTAC stations provide bearing and distance information to en route aircraft via radio signals transmitted 360 degrees in azimuth from the station. These signals allow pilots to navigate along a radial to or from a station, and to execute turns at intersections of radials emanating from separate stations. The range of a VORTAC station is limited by the line-of-sight to the aircraft in question, and is therefore dependent on the siting of the VORTAC beacon with relation to surrounding terrain and buildings, and on the height at which the aircraft is flying. A non-directional beacon (NDB) located approximately 6.5 miles northeast of the Airport in Chippewa Falls provides non-precision approach guidance. The Airport also has a rotating airport beacon light tower located next to the FBO hangars. Chippewa Valley Regional Airport Master Plan (May 2013) 1-26

Chapter 1 Inventory 1.3.5 Instrument Approach Procedures EAU has six published instrument approach procedures: three for Runway End 22, two for Runway End 4, and one circling approach for use on approach to all four runway ends. The visibility and cloud ceiling minimums for the procedures are presented in Table 1-11, and the procedure approach plates are presented in Figure 1-13 through Figure 1-18. Table 1-11: Instrument Approach Procedures Approach Name TCH GSA Visibility Minimum Cloud Ceiling Minimum ILS or LOC RWY 22 50' 3.00 0.5 Mile 200' AGL RNAV (GPS) RWY 22 50' 3.00 0.5 Mile 300' AGL NDB RWY 22 50' 3.26 1 Mile 600' AGL RNAV (GPS) RWY 4 44' 3.00 0.75 Mile 200' AGL LOC/DME BC RWY 4 44' 2.93 1.25 Mile 500' AGL VOR-A (Circling) N/A N/A 2.5 Mile 900' AGL Source: FAA Terminal Procedures 30 MAY 2013 to 27 JUN 2013 Notes: Alternate minimums may apply under instrument meteorological conditions (IMC). Minimums listed are for Category C aircraft. Minimums may be lower for smaller aircraft, and procedures may not be available for use by larger aircraft. ILS: Instrument Landing System NDB: Non-Directional Beacon LOC: Localizer DME: Distance Measuring Equipment RNAV: Area Navigation TCH: Threshold Crossing Height GPS: Global Positioning System GSA: Glideslope Angle VOR: Very High Frequency Omnidirectional Range AGL: Above Ground Level 1.3.6 Weather Observation Equipment EAU has an on-airfield Automated Surface Observation System (ASOS) that is operational 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. The ASOS is located north of Runway 4/22 and east of Runway 14/32, and reports temperature, precipitation, dew point, wind speed and direction, visibility, cloud coverage and ceiling, and other information to the FAA Flight Service Station (FSS) and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). Real-time weather reports are available to the public via radio and telephone. A wind cone and segmented circle, located to the immediate south of the ASOS, visually communicate prevailing wind speed and direction information to pilots. A wind cone (also known as a wind sock) is a hollow, conical, textile flag mounted on a pole. The wind cone is lighted at night to ensure it is visible. The wind cone is installed at the center of a segmented circle 100 feet in diameter. The segmented circle further aids pilots in locating the Airport, and provides a centralized location for indicators and signal devices. Wind cones are also located at all runway ends. Chippewa Valley Regional Airport Master Plan (May 2013) 1-27

Source Information: on: FAA Aeronautical al Navigation atio ion Products Figure 1-13 ILS or LOC Rwy 22 PREPARED BY: MASTER PLAN CHIPPEWA VALLEY REGIONAL AIRPORT (EAU) EAU CLAIRE/CHIPPEWA FALLS, WI May 2013 1-28

Source Information: o FAA Aeronautical a Navigation a ion Products Figure 1-14 RNAV (GPS) Rwy 22 PREPARED BY: MASTER PLAN CHIPPEWA VALLEY REGIONAL AIRPORT (EAU) EAU CLAIRE/CHIPPEWA FALLS, WI May 2013 1-29

Source Information: o FAA Aeronautical a Navigation a ion Products Figure 1-15 NDB Rwy 22 PREPARED BY: MASTER PLAN CHIPPEWA VALLEY REGIONAL AIRPORT (EAU) EAU CLAIRE/CHIPPEWA FALLS, WI May 2013 1-30