Agenda Implementation of the air traffic flow management (ATFM) in the SAM Region

Similar documents
Air Traffic Flow Management (ATFM) in the SAM Region METHODOLOGY ADOPTED BY BRAZIL TO CALCULATE THE CONTROL CAPACITY OF ACC OF BRAZILIAN FIR

According to FAA Advisory Circular 150/5060-5, Airport Capacity and Delay, the elements that affect airfield capacity include:

Appendix B Ultimate Airport Capacity and Delay Simulation Modeling Analysis

Implementation of air traffic flow management (ATFM) in the SAM Region REVIEW OF THE ATFM ACTION PLAN. (Presented by the Secretariat)

The purpose of this Demand/Capacity. The airfield configuration for SPG. Methods for determining airport AIRPORT DEMAND CAPACITY. Runway Configuration

Washington Dulles International Airport (IAD) Aircraft Noise Contour Map Update

IRISH AVIATION AUTHORITY DUBLIN POINT MERGE. Presented by James O Sullivan PANS-OPS & AIRSPACE INSPECTOR Irish Aviation Authority

Table of Contents. Overview Objectives Key Issues Process...1-3

APPENDIX D MSP Airfield Simulation Analysis

B GEORGIA INFRASTRUCTURE REPORT CARD AVIATION RECOMMENDATIONS DEFINITION OF THE ISSUE. Plan and Fund for the Future:

NOISE AND FLIGHT PATH MONITORING SYSTEM MELBOURNE QUARTERLY REPORT JULY - SEPTEMBER 2011

APPENDIX E ACTION PLAN FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ATFM AT SAM AIRPORTS A: AIRPORT. Task description Start End

NOISE AND FLIGHT PATH MONITORING SYSTEM MELBOURNE QUARTERLY REPORT JULY - SEPTEMBER 2013

NOISE AND FLIGHT PATH MONITORING SYSTEM MELBOURNE QUARTERLY REPORT OCTOBER - DECEMBER 2012

NOISE AND FLIGHT PATH MONITORING SYSTEM BRISBANE QUARTERLY REPORT JULY - SEPTEMBER 2011

NOISE AND FLIGHT PATH MONITORING SYSTEM BRISBANE QUARTERLY REPORT OCTOBER - DECEMBER 2013

Analysis of ATM Performance during Equipment Outages

Overview ICAO Standards and Recommended Practices for Aerodrome Safeguarding

WATTS ANTENNA COMPANY

GUIDE FOR THE APPLICATION OF A COMMON METHODOLOGY TO ESTIMATE AIRPORT AND ATC SECTOR CAPACITY FOR THE SAM REGION. Regional Project: ICAO RLA/06/901

Runway Status Lights (RWSL) in Japan. July 2015

VALUES UTILITY CREDIBILITY PROMPT RESPONSE MANAGE, SO THAT EVERYBODY CAN FLY.

Airfield Capacity Prof. Amedeo Odoni

Application of the reduced runway separation minima at the Sheremetyevo airport RUSSIAN FEDERATION

AIRCRAFT NOISE INFORMATION PACK: CANNING VALE

APPENDIX X: RUNWAY LENGTH ANALYSIS

1.1.3 Taxiways. Figure 1-15: Taxiway Data. DRAFT Inventory TYPICAL PAVEMENT CROSS-SECTION LIGHTING TYPE LENGTH (FEET) WIDTH (FEET) LIGHTING CONDITION

AIR LAW AND ATC PROCEDURES

FUEL MANAGEMENT FOR COMMERCIAL TRANSPORT

TAG Farnborough Airport

AIRSERVICES AUSTRALI A

Guidance for Complexity and Density Considerations - in the New Zealand Flight Information Region (NZZC FIR)

Defining and Managing capacities Brian Flynn, EUROCONTROL

Dubai contest LIDAR in Dubai DANS Wake Vortex campaign DXB Operations Dependent Diagonal Approach implementation Phase RPAT Approach concept

CHAPTER 4 DEMAND/CAPACITY ANALYSIS

PBN AIRSPACE CONCEPT WORKSHOP. SIDs/STARs/HOLDS. Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) ICAO Doc 9931

AIRSERVICES AUSTRALI A

CATCODE ] CATCODE

1. Air Traffic Statistics Suvarnabhumi Airport: Monday, 11 Sunday, 17 June Actual Daily Traffic & Runway Utilization. (Wed) 13 Jun.

TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION...

Air Navigation Bureau ICAO Headquarters, Montreal

Agenda: SASP SAC Meeting 3

TWELFTH WORKING PAPER. AN-Conf/12-WP/137. International ICAO. developing RNAV 1.1. efficiency. and terminal In line.

TABLE OF CONTENTS. General Study Objectives Public Involvement Issues to Be Resolved

FORT LAUDERDALE-HOLLYWOOD INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT DRAFT

Performance Metrics for Oceanic Air Traffic Management. Moving Metrics Conference Pacific Grove, California January 29, 2004 Oceanic Metrics Team

1.0 Project Background Mission Statement and Goals Objectives of this Sustainable Master Plan

Determining Airport Acceptance Rate (AAR) Mexico City Airport Case Study

Safety / Performance Criteria Agreeing Assumptions Module 10 - Activities 5 & 6

REGULATION No. 10/2011 ON APPROVAL OF FLIGHT PROCEDURES INCLUDING SID-s AND STAR-s. Article 1 Scope of Application

Learning Objectives 7.3 Flight Performance and Planning Flight Planning & Flight Monitoring

SJC North and South Flow

ICAO Activities. IFPP work on the Manual for Continuous Descent Operations. Federal Aviation Administration

Recommendations for Northbound Aircraft Departure Concerns over South Minneapolis

TANZANIA CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY AIR NAVIGATION SERVICES INSPECTORATE. Title: CONSTRUCTION OF VISUAL AND INSTRUMENT FLIGHT PROCEDURES

Operational implementation of new ATM automated systems and integration of the existing systems ADS-B IMPLEMENTATION IN GUYANA. (Presented by Guyana)

IATA FUEL EFFICIENCY CAMPAIGN

Regulations & Obligations

AN INTRODUCTION TO PANS-AERODROMES (Doc 9981)

INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION OF AIR TRAFFIC CONTROLLERS ASSOCIATIONS. Agenda Item: B.5.12 IFATCA 09 WP No. 94

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF CIVIL AVIATION TECHNICAL CENTRE, OPP SAFDURJUNG AIRPORT, NEW DELHI.

International Civil Aviation Organization. Twenty-Fourth South East Asia ATM Coordination Group (SAIOACG/7) Bangkok, Thailand, March 2017

FACILITY REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY OF KEY ISSUES OVERVIEW

Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport Monthly Runway Use System Report. June 2015

Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport Monthly Runway Use System Report. June 2016

Advisory Circular (AC)

Merritt Island Airport

Departures over the north-west, west and south-west from Runway 25. Arrivals from the south on Runways 34L and 34R.

Seychelles Civil Aviation Authority. Telecomm & Information Services Unit

EUR/SAM corridor airspace concept

The aim of any instrument approach is to allow the aircraft to safely descend to a low altitude in order to become visual.

RNP In Daily Operations

AERODROME OPERATING MINIMA

IAC 2011 Cape Town, October th

TAG Farnborough Airport

26 October 2017 JAZB Meeting #2. Flying Cloud Airport Joint Airport Zoning Board

FLIGHT OPERATIONS PANEL

3) There have some basic terminology of a flight plan and it is the fuel calculations

Operational Performance and Capacity Assessment for Perth Airport

ANALYSIS OF U.S. GENERAL AVIATION ACCIDENT RATES

Las Vegas McCarran International Airport. Capacity Enhancement Plan

Hotel. Price Index. November Released Date: January Hotel Price Index

Air Law and ATC Procedures Subject: AIR LAW AND ATC PROCEDURES

Appendix C AIRPORT LAYOUT PLANS

ICAO Standards. Airfield Information Signs. ICAO Annex 14, 4th Edition Aerodrome Design and Operations

Demand Patterns; Geometric Design of Airfield Prof. Amedeo Odoni

AERODROME METEOROLOGICAL OBSERVATION AND FORECAST STUDY GROUP (AMOFSG)

Suvarnabhumi Airport Runway Maintenance. Air Traffic Management Situation Review Week 4: 2 8 July 2012

Review of air navigation matters 2.3 Air navigation specific activities: Aerodromes and Ground Aids (AGA)

Flight Inspection for High Elevation Airports

Supplementary airfield projects assessment

SPADE-2 - Supporting Platform for Airport Decision-making and Efficiency Analysis Phase 2

Course Outline 10/29/ Santa Teresa Blvd Gilroy, CA COURSE: AFT 134 DIVISION: 50 ALSO LISTED AS: SHORT TITLE: AVIATION FLIGHT TECH

ATM Network Performance Report

DRONE SIGHTINGS ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Participant Presentations (Topics of Interest to the Meeting) GASP SAFETY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS. (Presented by the Secretariat) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Sound Transit Operations June 2016 Service Performance Report. Ridership

Overview ICAO Standards and Recommended Practices for Aerodrome Mapping Data reported to AIM

AIR TRAFFIC FLOW MANAGEMENT INDIA S PERSPECTIVE. Vineet Gulati GM(ATM-IPG), AAI

The offers operators increased capacity while taking advantage of existing airport infrastructure. aero quarterly qtr_03 10

Transcription:

SAM/IG/2 10/10/08 International Civil Aviation Organization South American Regional Office SECOND WORKSHOP / GROUP MEETING ON IMPLEMENTATION SAM (SAM/IG/2) REGIONAL PROJECT RLA/06/901 Lima, Peru, 3 to November 7, 2008 Agenda Item 4: Implementation of the air traffic flow management (ATFM) in the SAM Region METHODOLOGY USED BY BRAZIL FOR THE RUNWAY CAPACITY CALCULATION (Submitted by CGNA - Air Navigation Management Center of Brazil) Summary This paper aims to submit to ICAO, the methodology adopted by Brazil for the runway capacity calculation. Reference: Doc 8168 ICAO Aircraft Operations. 1 Introduction 1.1 The saturation of the runway operational capacity for arrivals and departures have been seen as one of the biggest problems for domestic and international airports. In order to maintain the air traffic flow near the optimal conditions, avoiding possible overflow in the system, the Brazilian Air Navigation Management Center (CGNA) applies standard proceedures for runway capacity calculations. These procedures help to follow the changes in demand/capacity at the airports, to find parameters which support recommendations to the airports of interest in advance and to keep the overall operation in harmony. According to the evolution of the air traffic at airports, the runway capacity calculation will take into account not only the runway occupancy, but also other factors which can significantly interfere in the runway operational capacity.

SAM/IG/2-2 - 1.2 To determine the capacity of a runway or a set of runways, the following factors are considered: a) planning factors; and b) factors related to the landing and takeoff operations. 1.2.1 Planning Factors The planning factors are elements used to simplify the mathematical models, or the operational aspects, which influence the determination of the runway capacity. The most common are: a) Optimal conditions for aircraft sequencing and air traffic coordination; b) All operational teams are considered with the same capacity and same operational performance; and c) All radio-navigation and visual-aid are considered, technically and operationally, unrestricted, and all communication equipment (VHF/telephony) are considered operational. 1.2.2 Factors Related to the Takeoff and Landing Operations a) runway occupancy ; b) Aircraft Mix ; c) Thresholds percentage of use; d) Final approach segment length; e) Standardized minimum separation between the aircrafts for landing; f) Runways and taxiways configuration, and g) Final approach speed. 2 Analysis The mathematical model for calculating the theoretical runway capacity used by DECEA is described in the following sections. In some of the steps, the aircraft classification is used by grade (A through E), according to the Doc 8168 (Table III-1-2). 2.1 MATHEMATICAL MODEL FOR THE THEORETICAL RUNWAY CAPACITY STEP 1 COLLECTION OF DATA FROM THE AIRPORT: 1º) The runway occupation at takeoff (TOPD): taken by the aircraft during the takeoff operation or the measured from the moment when the aircraft leaves the hold short of position until the it flyies over the opposite threshold; 2º) The runway occupation at landing (TOPP): spent from the point at which the aircraft crosses the threshold of the runway during the landing operation until it leaves the runway; and

- 3 - SAM/IG/2 3º) Flight from the outer marker (or FAF) to the threshold of the runway (T): taken by the aircraft during the final approach, from the moment when the aircraft crosses over the outer marker (or FAF) until it crosses the threshold of the runway or, in the absence of an outer marker, when it starts the final approach segment until it crosses the threshold of the runway. The aircraft category is considered in the mesurement process. Obs.: The s previously described are classified by the aircraft category and are taken in the control tower of the airfield. These s will be recorded on special forms (Annexes 1 and 2, respectively). It is important to explain that during the mesurement, will be watched the "Modus Operandi" of the ATC Organs in the studied airfield. STEP 2 AVERAGE RUNWAY OCCUPANCY TIME (MATOP) runway occupancy will be calculated for each runway threshold; due to the fact that each runway has its own configuration. This leads to different average of runway occupancy in each threshold. After taking the runway occupancy, the arithmetic average of the runway occupancy (MATOP) is calculated separatelly by aircraft category, as follows: MATOPA= MATOPB= MATOPC= MATOPD= MATOPE= TOPDA+TOPPA 2 TOPDB+TOPPB 2 TOPDC+TOPPC 2 TOPDD+TOPPD 2 TOPDE+TOPPE 2 STEP 3 AIRCRAFT MIX (MIX) Aircraft Mix is the fleet configuration operating at the studied airport. According to Doc 8168, the aircraft are subdivided into five categories, depending on the runway threshold crossing speed, which must be 130% of the value of the stall speed with the landing configuration (full flaps, gear down). Therefore, the aircraft are classified as follows: "A" speed less than 90 kt "B" Speed between 91/120kt "C" Speed between 121/140kt "D" speed between 141/165kt

SAM/IG/2-4 - "E" Speed between 166/210kt The percentage by aircraft category (Mix) will be calculated from the total daily movement. To obtain this number, the data sample should be taken in the period of one week. The choosen week should contain the day selected to collect the data for calculating the runway occupation. The table below shows an example of aircraft mix calculation: MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY ACFT PERC ACFT PERC ACFT PERC ACFT PERC ACFT PERC A 32 8.42% 29 7.63% 25 6.51% 39 9.68% 25 6.31% B 55 14.47% 57 15.00% 61 15.89% 73 18.11% 66 16.67% C 283 74.47% 283 74.47% 286 74.48% 282 69.98% 297 75.00% D 6 1.58% 11 2.89% 11 2.86% 8 1.99% 8 2.02% E 4 1.05% 0 0.00% 1 0.26% 1 0.25% 0 0.00% TOTAL 380 100% 380 100% 384 100% 403 100% 396 100% STEP 4 Arithmetic mean Mix A 7.71 % B 16.03 % C 73.68 % D 2.27 % E 0.31 % TOTAL 100 % WEIGHTED AVERAGE TIME OF RUNWAY OCCUPATION (TMOP) It is the weighted average of the arithmetic average of the runway occupation (MATOP) by category of aircraft, taking into account the mix of aircrafts.the average should be calculated for each threshold in the aerodrome, because the different configurations of the taxiways for each threshold in use. TMOP = MIX A x MATOPA + MIX B x MATOPB + MIX C x MATOPC + MIX D x MATOPD + MIX E MATOPE MIX STEP 5 FINAL APPROACH SPEED(VA)

- 5 - SAM/IG/2 It is the speed needed to go through the segment of final approach (SAF) for landing. This velocity comes from the division of the approach segment length by the flight (T) from the outer marker (or FAF) until the runway threshold. STEP 6 VA A =SAF T A VA B =SAF T B VA C =SAF T C VA D =SAF T D VA E =SAF T E AVERAGE SPEED IN THE FINAL APPROACH (VM): Weighted average of the final approach speeds, taking into account the mix of aircraft. VM= MIX A xva A + MIX B xva B + MIX C xva C + MIX D xva D + MIX E xva E MIX STEP 7 DETERMINATION OF SAFE SEPARATION (SS): The study considers the occurrence of a takeoff between two consecutive landings, but without affecting the regulatory minimum separation (SMR), which is established in rules of ICA 100-12 in the case of Brazil. With this aim, it is necessary to calculate a safe distance to be added to the regulatory minimum separation between aircrafts on approach, in order to allow the take off of an aircraft, after the landing of the first approaching aircraft, but without compromising the regulatory separation to the second approaching one. This distance comes from the multiplication of the weighted average speed in the final and the weighted average of the runway occupation. SS = VM x TMOP

SAM/IG/2-6 - STEP 8 DETERMINATION OF TOTAL SEPARATION BETWEEN TWO CONSECUTIVES LANDINGS (ST): By calculating the distance traveled by the second aircraft on final approach, during the that the runway stays busy and adding the calculated distance to the regulatory minimum separation adopted, we get the necessary separation between two consecutive landings. The total separation comes from the summation of the safe separation distance (SS) with the regulatory minimum separation, as follows: ST = SMR + SS There are cases where the SS can be disregarded. Usually this can happen at the airports that have two or more runways, improoving the dynamism of the operation and enabling an aircraft to line up and wait on a runway during the landing of other aircraft on another runway. STEP 9 DETERMINATION OF WEIGHTED AVERAGE TIME BETWEEN TWO CONSECUTIVES LANDINGS (TMST): The weighted average used for the total separation between two consecutive landings is obtained from the total separation distance length divided by the weighted average speed of the aircraft mixing, as follows: TMST = ST/VM STEP 10 DETERMINATION OF THE NUMBER OF LANDING AIRCRAFT IN ONE HOUR (P): The possible number of landings with the proposed separation within a interval of one hour is obtained dividing the interval of one hour by the weighted average used for the total separation between two consecutive landings, as follows: STEP 11 P = 1Hora(sec)/TMST(sec) DETERMINATION OF THE NUMBER OF DEPARTURE IN ONE HOUR (D):

- 7 - SAM/IG/2 Applying the calculated total separation it is possible to have one departure between two consecutive landings. Decreasing one aircraft of the total number of landings, we get the possible number of departure in the interval of one hour. STEP 12 D = P-1 DETERMINATION OF THE RUNWAY CAPACITY (CP): The runway capacity comes from the addiction of the number of landings with the number of takeoffs, as folows: STEP 13 PERCENTAGE OF RUNWAY USAGE (PU): CP=P+D The runaway usage percentage is calculated from the total monthly movement, obtained from a one year data sample. In order to achieve the required precision in the calculations, the last twelve months data of the control tower management systems are analysed to measure the usage percentage of each runway of the aerodrome. The tables below show an example the runaway usage percentage calculation: RUNWAY % RUNWAY OCUPATION A 86 B 14 TOTAL 100 MES RWY A RWY B MONTHLY MOVEMENT ENE 7622 2631 10253 FEB 6364 3229 9593 MAR 9239 2409 11648 ABR 9965 1184 11149 MAY 10811 896 11707 JUN 11280 291 11571 JUL 11637 620 12257 AGO 12145 263 12408 SET 11687 273 11960 OCT 9177 2184 11361 NOV 7765 2936 10701 DIC 7487 3665 11152 TOTAL 115179 20581 135760

SAM/IG/2-8 - STEP 14 CAPACITY OF A RUNWAY SET The runway capacity of a runway set is the full sustainable capacity, in the operational point of view, considering the runway usage percentage of each runway. The runway set capacity is the weighted average of each runway capacity, considering the respective runway usage percentage, as follows: CA = PU 1 xcp 1 + PU 2 xcp 2 +...PU N xcp N PU 1 +PU 2... PU N 2.2 Practicable Runway Capacity The practicable runway, or runway set, capacity can be choosen between 80% and 100% of the theoretical runway capacity. It is recommended to use values closed to 80% of the theoretical runway capacity to reduce the possibility of delays during the operation when some external factor, like weather, operational delays of the companies, etc., interferes in the normal airdrome operation. When the practicable runway capacity value is closed to 100%, it becomes difficult to recover delays caused by external factors. 3 Action suggested 3.1 The meeting is invited to: a) Analyze the information presented in the Working Paper. * * * * * *

A-1 SAM/IG/2 APPENDIX A DEPARTURE TIME OF RUNWAY OCUPPATION Airdrome: Date: RWY: Time of beginning: Time of ending: Aircraft Category Time Obs OBS.: In the fields below is the average of runway occupation by aircraft category. A B C D E

SAM/IG/2 B-2 APPENDIX B ARRIVAL TIME OF RUNWAY OCCUPATION Airdrome: Date: RWY: Time of beginning: Time of ending Aircraft Category Time Obs OBS.: In the fields below is the average of runway occupation by aircraft category. A B C D E

C-1 SAM/IG/2 APPENDIX C ARRIVAL TIME BETWEN OM AND THR Airdrome: Date: RWY: Time of beginning: Time of ending: AIRCRAFT Type Category VELOCIDAD(KT) speed OM THR wind(kt) OBS: OBS.: In the fields below is the average of runway occupation by aircraft category A B C D E

D-1 SAM/IG/2 ARR ATC Arrival Air Traffic Control APPENDIX D ABBREVIATIONS ATCO CFP CTP CT CGNA DEP FAA IEPV OM FAF FPL IMC RWY SAS SEP REQ SGTC TARIS TG TOP THR TPH Air Traffic Control Officer Category Actual Runway Capacity Hypothetical Runway Capacity Time Counting Air Navigation Management Center Departure Federal Aviation Administration Brazilian Aeronautical Forms Outer Marker Final Approach Fix Filed Flight Plan Instrument Meteorological Conditions Runway Situation Analysis System Required Separation Control Tower Management System Terminal of radar presentation with synthetic image Touch-and-Go Runway Occupancy Time Threshold Typical Peak Hour

E-1 SAM/IG/2 APPENDIX E DEFINITIONS a) ACTUAL RUNWAY CAPACITY The possible maximum number of operations during sixty minutes, taking into account the runway occupancy. (t op ). b) HYPOTHETICAL RUNWAY CAPACITY The runway capacity calculated during sixty minutes, taking into account the average of runway occupancy and the legislation concerning aircraft separation, including the specific rules and procedures adopted to the local operations. c) AEROPLANE EGORY Classification of aeroplanes subdivided into five groups (a, b, c, d, e), defined according to the indicated airspeed at threshold which must be equal to 130 per cent of the stall speed, with a landing configuration (full flaps, gear down). d) AIRCRAFT MIX Percent distribution of the aircraft fleet in operation in the analyzed airport, according to the aeroplane category. e) PERCENTAGE BY AEROPLANE EGORY Calculated index considering the total daily aircraft movement, reported in the IEPV 100-34 form (Aircraft Movement in Aerodromes) or collected from the Control Tower Management Systems. This index is equal to the percent mean of one year sample, based on weekdays (except Saturdays, Sundays and holidays). f) PERCENTAGE OF RUNWAY UTILIZATION AT AN AERODROME Calculated index considering the total daily aircraft movement. This index is equal to the percent mean of one year sample in order to approve the confidence on the data. g) SATURATION Situation on which the air traffic demand is higher than the airport capacity or than a certain control sector. h) RUNWAY OCCUPANCY TIME FOR DEPARTING AIRCRAFT Runway occupancy for departing aircraft based on the moment that the aircraft leaves the holding point until the moment it crosses the opposite threshold. i) RUNWAY OCCUPANCY TIME FOR ARRIVING AIRCRAFT Runway occupancy for arriving aircraft based on the moment that the aircraft crosses the threshold until the moment it vacates the runway. j) AVERAGE RUNWAY OCCUPANCY TIME TAKING INTO ACCOUNT EACH AEROPLANE EGORY Arithmetic mean, considering each aeroplane category, between the runway occupancy for departing aircraft and the runway occupancy for arriving aircraft.