WHAT IS THE BALANCED APPROACH?

Similar documents
ACI EUROPE POSITION. on the revision of. EU DIRECTIVE 2002/30 (noise-related operating restrictions at community airports)

ACI EUROPE POSITION. on the revision of. EU DIRECTIVE 2002/30 (noise-related operating restrictions at community airports)

ICAO Initiatives on Aircraft Noise

DIRECTIVE 2002/30/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

Measuring, Managing and Mitigating Aircraft Related Noise

Aircraft Noise Technology and International Noise Standards. Dr. Neil Dickson, Environment Officer Environment, ICAO Air Transport Bureau

KOAK HIGH. Metropolitan Oakland Intl Airport Oakland, California, United States

NATIONAL AIRSPACE POLICY OF NEW ZEALAND

TORONTO PEARSON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT NOISE MANAGEMENT

Quiet Climb. 26 AERO First-Quarter 2003 January

COLLOQUIUM ON ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS OF AVIATION

Airport Noise Management: Benchmarking of 12 International Airports

The mandate and composition of the Committee were changed following:

Welcome to AVI AFRIQUE 2017

NIGHT NOISE POLICY

Federal Aviation Administration DCA. By: Terry Biggio, Vice President Air Traffic Services Date: June 18, Federal Aviation Administration

UPDATE ON THE 6 IDEAS (1-4) NAV CANADA

Aeronautics & Air Transport in FP7. DG RTD-H.3 - Aeronautics Brussels, January 2007

ACI Noise Rating Index and its applications

AFCAC Presentation ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES IN AFRICA. Boubacar Djibo Secretary General of AFCAC. EU-Africa Aviation Summit (Windhoek, 3 4 April 2009)

Dott.ssa Benedetta Valenti

ICAO updates. ICAO European and North Atlantic Office. 12 September 2013 Page 1

Dave Allanby GM Operations SOUTH AFRICAN EXPRESS

KSNA HIGH. John Wayne Airport Orange County Santa Ana, California, United States. Diagram #1: Noise Monitor map and noise sensitive areas

and the Environment Speaker: Guy Viselé External Communication Advisor ABC User Committee, February 2 nd 2009

IATA Fuel Efficiency Program

During all other times operators are required to use the designated run-up locations for run-ups above idle power.

Airport Noise Management in Thailand

Control of Airport- and Aircraft-Related Noise in the United States

Aeronautics & Air Transport in FP7

Why are the underground fuel tanks being removed and replaced with above ground tanks?

Air Navigation Bureau ICAO Headquarters, Montreal

Land Use and Environmental Control

SALVADOR DECLARATION. Adopted in the city of Salvador de Bahia on 16 November 2009 by the XVIII ACI LAC Annual General Regional Assembly

LAX Community Noise Roundtable. Aircraft Noise 101. November 12, 2014

ASSEMBLY 37TH SESSION

8.4.9 Fatigue Management. Republic of Korea

TWENTY-SECOND MEETING OF THE ASIA/PACIFIC AIR NAVIGATION PLANNING AND IMPLEMENTATION REGIONAL GROUP (APANPIRG/22)

LAX. Noise Management. Program. Sound Ideas In Action

FRENCH VALLEY AIRPORT (F70) Sky Canyon Dr. Murrieta, CA. Phone: Riverside FAA FSDO Complaint Line: (951)

THE BURBANK-GLENDALE-PASADENA AIRPORT AUTHORITY S UPDATE REGARDING ITS NOISE IMPACT AREA REDUCTION PLAN AND ITS PART 161 STUDY SECOND QUARTER 2015

Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport (MSP)

Portland International Jetport FAR Part 150 Update

Applewood Heights Community Open House

COMMUNITY NOISE MITIGATION SUGGESTIONS

KPGD HIGH. Punta Gorda Airport Punta Gorda, Florida, United States. Diagram #1: KPGD Departures. NOISE ABATEMENT PROCEDURES by Whispertrack

Glass Cockpits in General Aviation Aircraft. Consequences for training and simulators. Fred Abbink

THE BURBANK-GLENDALE-PASADENA AIRPORT AUTHORITY S UPDATE REGARDING ITS NOISE IMPACT AREA REDUCTION PLAN AND ITS PART 161 STUDY FIRST QUARTER 2015

About ABTA. Executive summary

AIRPORT POLLUTION CONTROL AUTHORITY. April 2016 Workshop «air pollution and airports»

The Noise & Environmental office reviews airline schedules and night-time performance of the airlines operating at the Airport.

Atlantic Interoperability Initiative to Reduce Emissions AIRE

Long Beach Airport. A Sound Approach. for a Quieter Community

ICAO Assembly achieves historic consensus on sustainable future for global civil aviation

THE BURBANK-GLENDALE-PASADENA AIRPORT AUTHORITY S UPDATE REGARDING ITS NOISE IMPACT AREA REDUCTION PLAN AND ITS PART 161 STUDY SECOND QUARTER 2017

Ad Hoc Airport Noise Committee. April 18, 2017

(i) Adopted or adapted airworthiness and environmental standards;

BUSINESS AVIATION INTERNATIONAL CHALLENGES AND ISSUES. A presentation to the ICAO Council

Chapter 4 Noise. 1. Airport noise

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 100(2) thereof,

MINNEAPOLIS-ST. PAUL PUBLIC INPUT MEETING 3 RD QUARTER 2016 INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT (MSP)

CEE 5614 and CEE Aircraft Classifications. Spring 2013

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 26 March 2014 (OR. en) 5560/2/14 REV 2. Interinstitutional File: 2011/0398 (COD)

KTRK HIGH. Truckee Tahoe Airport Truckee, California, United States

Aircraft Noise When moving to a new area, it is important to understand the implications of air traffic.

Airlines and Aircraft Noise Management & Reduction

REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA MINISTRY OF TRANSPORT, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND COMMUNICATIONS

REVIEW OF MEASURES FOR MITIGATION OF NOISE IMPACT AROUND CIVIL AIRPORTS AND MILITARY AIRFIELDS IN JAPAN

IATA FUEL EFFICIENCY CAMPAIGN

KPAO HIGH. Palo Alto Arpt Of Santa Clara Co Airport Palo Alto, California, United States Diagram #1: Noise Abatement Procedures All Runways

Andres Lainoja Eesti Lennuakadeemia

Noise Abatement 101. July 13, Regular Board Meeting / August 7, 2014 Hillsborough County Aviation Authority

Overview of Evolution to Performance Based Navigation. ICAO PBN Seminar Overview of Evolution to Performance Based Navigation

UNFCCC Facilitative Dialogue on Enhancing Ambition and Support (Marrakech, Morocco, 16 November 2016)

> Aircraft Noise. Bankstown Airport Master Plan 2004/05 > 96

Comparison Between Old and New ALUC Plans

Appendix A. Meeting Coordination. Appendix A

Aerodrome Safety. H.V. SUDARSHAN International Civil Aviation Organization

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF CIVIL AVIATION TECHNICAL CENTRE, OPP. SAFDURJUNG AIRPORT, NEW DELHI

Making travel easier and more affordable. easyjet s views on how aviation policy can improve the passenger experience and reduce costs

Master Plan & Noise Compatibility Study Update

NOISE ABATEMENT PROCEDURES

USE AND APPLICATION OF GNSS IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF NAVIGATION BASED ON PERFORMANCE IN ECUADOR

Overview ICAO Standards and Recommended Practices for Aerodrome Safeguarding

NASA Low Boom Flight Demonstration (LBFD) Project Overview

NASA Aeronautics: Overview & ODM

Noise Abatement Arrival Procedures at Louisville International Airport. Prof. John-Paul Clarke Georgia Institute of Technology

FIRST PUBLIC WORKSHOP

08-JUL Innovation Challenges for Airports of the Future. ASDA Seminar 2013, Toulouse Chris Schneider

O Hare Noise Compatibility Commission Technical Committee April 19, Proposed Interim Fly Quiet Runway Rotation Plan

Portable Noise Monitor Report

I-54 Assembly Resolutions in Force. Consolidated statement of continuing ICAO policies and practices related to environmental protection

On Demand. Fall, Spring. Spring

Portable Noise Monitor Report

STAFF REPORT. Airport Land Use Plan Consistency Review: Old Town Village Mixed Use Project City of Goleta. MEETING DATE: June 18, 2015 AGENDA ITEM: 5M

Global Action on International Aviation and Climate Change

COURTESY TRANSLATION ORDINANCE (PORTARIA) 303-A / 2004

POST-IMPLEMENTATION COMMUNITY IMPACT REVIEW

Massport and FAA RNAV Pilot Study Overview Briefing to Massport CAC. December 8, 2016

ADS-B via Low Earth Orbiting Satellites Benefits Assessment

Transcription:

WHAT IS THE BALANCED APPROACH? Averting and reducing aircraft noise 1

WHAT IS THE BALANCED APPROACH? Table of contents About the author... 3 1. Noise management at airports: a necessity... 4 Averting and reducing 6 2. What is the balanced approach?... 3. Applying the balanced approach... 18 4. A few examples... Further information... 16 aircraft noise 15

About the author 01dB contributes to reducing noise and vibrations to levels required by regulations or set out in sustainable development strategies. 01dB is aimed at town councils, and the industrial, transportation, public works and construction, wind power and leisure sectors. This white paper was produced jointly with A-Tech / Acoustic Technologies, a pioneer in the balanced approach since 1997. 3

1. Noise management at airports: a necessity Air traffic has increased considerably in recent years, and will continue to grow in the years ahead. According to Airbus, Boeing and the International Air Transport Association (IATA), air traffic is expected to double in the next 15 to 20 years. More than 3.2 billion passengers were recorded in 2014, up from 1.5 billion in 2003. This number will reach 6.7 billion in 2032. The consequences on the noise environment at airports are inevitable. Noise is systematically cited as a major disruption to day-to-day life by respondents in French surveys (TNS Sofres). 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 Millions of passengers 1950 1969 1976 1979 1986 1991 1997 2001 2006 2008 2013 Worldwide air passenger numbers Source: http://transport.sia-partners. com/face-la-croissance-dutrafic-aerien-les-grandsprojets-dinfrastructures-desaeroports 4

The main sources of environmental disruption at airports are noise pollution and atmospheric pollution. Noise has an impact on physical and mental health, and also on the quality of life of every person affected. According to the INRS*, noise can cause stress, sleep disruption, reduced cognitive performance** and cardiovascular disorders. The risk of occupational accidents is also increased due to warning signals and verbal communication being masked by noise. To cope with the increase in traffic, and thus the increase in noise sources, it is essential to create a better controlled noise environment. Communication and discussions between airport managers and neighboring residents are also necessary. * The INRS is the French national research and safety institute, a public body responsible for occupational health and occupational risk prevention. ** The term cognitive refers to all mind-related processes (language, memory, reasoning, motor coordination, perception and learning). 5

2. What is the balanced approach? The principle of the balanced approach to aircraft noise management was adopted by the ICAO (International Civil Aviation Organization) Assembly in 2001. ICAO guidance on the subject was published in 2004*. This approach entails identifying the various noise problems at an airport and then analyzing the measures available to reduce noise. Four main methods are used to enhance the management of noise in the environment. The measures set out in the balanced approach are applied on a case-by-case basis, taking into account the specifics of each airport. This strategy allows airports to pursue their integrated development strategies. * Guidance on the Balanced Approach to Aircraft Noise Management», Doc. 9829 AN/451, second edition 2008, ICAO Source: http://www.icao.int/environmental-protection/pages/noise.aspx 6

THE ISSUES ECONOMY QUALITY OF LIFE Employment Controlled activity Investment Daytime and nighttime rest Health Affordable housing Mobility ECOLOGY Noise pollution Fine particulates Climate objectives 7

3. Applying the balanced approach The four principal elements of the balanced approach are as follows: BALANCED APPROACH 1. REDUCTION OF NOISE AT SOURCE 2. LAND USE PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT 3. NOISE ABATEMENT OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES 4. OPERATING RESTRICTIONS db Each measure is applied as appropriate for an individual airport and its layout. 8

3.1. Reduction of noise at source Generally speaking, this element of the balanced approach is not under the control of airports, as it relates to aircraft manufacturers. The ICAO (International Civil Aviation Organization) states that the term reduction of noise at source relates to the intrinsic characteristics of aircraft, not the manner in which they are used. ORIGINS OF ENGINE NOISE AND AERODYNAMIC NOISE SOURCES ON AN AIRCRAFT FAN noise COMPRESSOR noise COMBUSTION noise TURBINE noise JET noise Source: IROQUA (French research initiative for aeronautical acoustic optimization) 9

Aircraft characteristics can be modified to reduce noise at source. For example, noise may be caused by the air speed at the outlet of a turbine ejection nozzle, or by a supersonic speed at the tip of an impeller blade. By reducing the diameter of the rotation disc of an impeller by adding an additional blade, the noise will be reduced because the speed of the blade tip will decrease. In recent years, manufacturers have faced increasingly strict noise regulations. For example, the restrictions applicable to Boeing 727 and Douglas DC-9 aircraft built in the 1960s were less stringent than those for the Boeing 767 or Airbus A319 aircraft built in the 1980s and 1990s. In addition to meeting national regulations, all aircraft must comply with the acoustic certification standards set by the ICAO: an aircraft certified in accordance with these standards can fly and land anywhere in the world, but it may need to meet additional criteria in order to be used in certain countries with more restrictive rules (European countries, the U.S., etc.). 10

3.2. Land use planning and management The AQTA (Quebec air transport association) has noted that conflicts between citizens and air transport operators stem primarily from land use and urban development issues. Land use planning and management can be effective in ensuring that activities taking place near airports are compatible with aviation. The goal of this principle is to minimize the population affected by aircraft noise by means of zoning. Different noise zones around the airport are defined to take account of aspects such as population density, increased airport traffic or logistics activities. Additional measures may nevertheless be required in zones which remain affected. Land use planning and management methods may be categorized as follows: Planning instruments Ensure that planning is coherent (i.e. take the current and future situations into consideration) Draw up a legal definition of zones and compatible uses Consider relocation rights for land owners Offer compensation 11

Action instruments Building regulations Soundproofing programs Construction of noise control screens (generally in the form of embankments) to minimize noise from aircraft on the ground Purchase and sale of land and homes, expropriation/relocation Assignment of compatible uses to purchased land Land management review Grants for relocation and rehousing of affected residents Financial instruments Long-term investment (infrastructure enhancements) Tax incentives Airport fees (set as a function of noise impact) 12

3.3. Noise abatement operational procedures These procedures aim to minimize noise pollution around the airport by optimizing how aircraft use the facilities. DIAGRAM OF CONTINUOUS DESCENT APPROACH The possibilities include noise preferential runways and routes, and noise abatement procedures for take-off and landing. The appropriateness of any of these measures depends on the physical layout of the airport and its surroundings. For example, by extending the usable runway in the direction away from inhabited areas, aircraft can fly at higher altitude when they pass above nearby residential buildings. This technique is used at Montreal-Trudeau airport. Altitude (m) 2000 m 1200 m 900 m Continuous descent approach Start of continuous descent Descent point with step at 1200 m Descent point with step at 900 m Another technique is to require pilots to make a turn once they have reached a safe altitude, thereby avoiding overflying certain zones. NOISE ABATEMENT ZONE 3 Runway Lastly, a continuous descent approach procedure can be implemented. This technique enables crews to avoid the conventional step-down approach which makes greater use of the engines during descent. Noise and fuel consumption are both reduced. Distance to the runway (km) 25 20 15 Source: French ministry of the environment, energy and marine affairs 13

3.4. Operating restrictions Restrictions can be placed on aircraft operating at certain airports. There are four types of operating restrictions: Global restrictions which apply to all traffic at an airport Restrictions specific to certain aircraft types (depending on their noise emissions characteristics) Partial restrictions which apply at certain periods (times of day, daytime/nighttime, days of the week) Progressive restrictions which entail gradually decreasing noise exposure over a period of time before reaching the target noise level. Some countries, especially industrialized countries, have considered banning certain noisy aircraft from their airports. This measure can have serious economic implications for the airlines concerned, however. All these measures have been proven. However, the ICAO advice is to start with the first three principles, keeping operating restrictions as a last resort. 14

4. A few examples BRUSSELS SOUTH CHARLEROI AIRPORT: 87 COMPLAINTS PER YEAR ON AVERAGE Brussels South Charleroi airport has applied the principles of the balanced approach since 2001. A full range of measures has been taken to enable the sustainable development of the airport, including noise reduction procedures, planning, better land use management and tried-and-tested soundproofing plans. The overall balanced approach implementation rate is 86%. The airport constantly manages its noise problem in order to allow controlled development of its activities. LIÈGE: 27 COMPLAINTS PER YEAR ON AVERAGE Liège airport carried out its first noise optimization and reduction studies, and drew up prevention plans, in 1997. It was a pioneer in the balanced approach, applying these principles and measures well before they were recommended by the ICAO. The overall balanced approach implementation rate is 86%, as at Charleroi. The airport continues to take an active approach via noise abatement procedures, land use planning and management, and tried-and-tested soundproofing plans. MANCHESTER: 838 COMPLAINTS PER YEAR ON AVERAGE Manchester is an example of an airport which applies soundproofing measures, financial tools, operating restrictions, monitoring, communication and consultation. It has, however, only reached an implementation rate of 50% for land use planning and management and noise abatement procedures, probably due to its location well away from the city. Its overall implementation rate stands at 87%. 15

FIND OUT MORE For more information 01dB A noise-monitoring partner for local authorities and companies in France and around the world. ACNUSA: http://www.acnusa.fr/en/ Sources http://transport.sia-partners.com/facela-croissance-du-trafic-aerien-lesgrands-projets-dinfrastructures-desaeroports http://www.icao.int/environmentalprotection/pages/noise.aspx IROQUA (French research initiative for aeronautical acoustic optimization) French ministry of the environment, energy and marine affairs 16