International Civil Aviation Organization. UNDP/ICAO Regional Project RLA/98/003 Transition to the CNS/ATM Systems in the CAR and SAM Regions

Similar documents
Proposal for the updating of the FASID ATM Evolution Tables

MONITORING IS REQUIRED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS TABLE

Second Seminar on RVSM Implementation in the CARS/SAM Regions

International Civil Aviation Organization UNDP/ICAO Regional Project RLA/98/003 Transition to the CNS/ATM Systems in the CAR and SAM Regions

RVSM MINIMUM MONITORING REQUIREMENTS

AUSTRALIAN AIRSPACE MONITORING AGENCY (AAMA) RVSM MINIMUM MONITORING REQUIREMENTS: AS OF: 4 December 2014

RVSM MINIMUM MONITORING REQUIREMENTS: AS OF: 25 May 2017 Version:

Implementation of air traffic flow management (ATFM) in the SAM Region REVIEW OF THE ATFM ACTION PLAN. (Presented by the Secretariat)

Air navigation deficiencies in the CAR/SAM Regions with high risk ( U priority) (Presented by the Secretariat)

Fieldwork Dates AmericasBarometer

ICAO regional technical cooperation tools for the implementation of air navigation and safety improvements

WEST ATLANTIC ROUTE SYSTEM (WATRS) PLUS AIRSPACE REDESIGN AND SEPARATION REDUCTION INITIATIVE. (Presented by United States of America) SUMMARY

AIR TRAFFIC SERVICES (ATS) INTERFACILITY DATA COMMUNICATION (AIDC)

International Civil Aviation Organization South American Regional Office

POST-IMPLEMENTATION MONITORING OF THE NEW ICAO MODEL FLIGHT PLAN FORMAT. (Presented by Cuba)

Agenda Item 3: Performance framework for Regional Air Navigation Planning and Implementation

Standards and procedures for performance-based navigation operations approval

ASSEMBLY 35TH SESSION

OPTIMIZATION OF SAM AIRSPACE. (Presented by the Secretariat)

POST-IMPLEMENTATION COMMUNITY IMPACT REVIEW

HIGH-LEVEL SAFETY CONFERENCE

PROPOSED CHANGES FOR THE CAR REGION ATS ROUTE STRUCTURE. (Presented by the Secretariat) SUMMARY

TWELFTH WORKING PAPER. AN-Conf/12-WP/137. International ICAO. developing RNAV 1.1. efficiency. and terminal In line.

Agenda Review to the action plans for the implementation of AIDC interconnection in the NAM/CAR/SAM Regions

Project and procedures to improve some Aircraft Types models and Fuel Consumption estimates in the Eurocontrol Small emitters tool

(Presented by the Secretariat) SUMMARY. This Working Paper presents for the Meeting s consideration, the Draft Agenda and suggested schedule

AVIATION SECURITY (AVSEC) AND FACILITATION (FAL) TRAINING AND ASSISTANCE ACTIVITIES IN THE NAM/CAR REGIONS. (Presented by the Secretariat)

Implementation of the Performance-Based Air Navigation Systems for the CAR Region ICAO Regional TC Project RLA/09/801 Agenda Item 6 WP/14

Make Model Number(s) STC No: Description System Covered SA449GL

CANSO ATFM Data Exchange Network for the Americas (CADENA) (Presented by ALTA, CANSO, COCESNA and IATA)

APPENDIX E ACTION PLAN FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ATFM AT SAM AIRPORTS A: AIRPORT. Task description Start End

2012 Performance Framework AFI

Operational implementation of new ATM automated systems and integration of the existing ones FOLLOW-UP ON THE IMPLEMENATION OF AUTOMATED SYSTEMS

AIR GROUND DATA LINK IN SOUTH ATLANTIC REGION. NAM/ CAR/ SAM ATS DATALINK IMPLEMENTATION WORKSHOP (Philisburg, Sint Maarten, April 2016)

Follow-up to the implementation of air navigation priorities FOLLOW-UP TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF AMHS INTERCONNECTION AND NATIONAL IP NETWORKS

Status and outlook of the Regional Safety Oversight Cooperation System (SRVSOP) (Presented by the Secretariat) SUMMARY

LARGE HEIGHT DEVIATION ANALYSIS FOR THE WESTERN ATLANTIC ROUTE SYSTEM (WATRS) AIRSPACE CALENDAR YEAR 2016

STRATEGY/ACTION PLAN FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF REDUCED VERTICAL SEPARATION MINIMA IN THE AFRICA-INDIAN OCEAN REGION 22 NOVEMBER 2003

Gate Name Operator Operator Name

Agenda Item 5: Airspace Safety Monitoring Activities/Requirements in the Asia/Pacific Region

International Civil Aviation Organization. Air Traffic Services Route Network Task Force (ARN TF) Sixth Meeting (Cairo, Egypt April 2013)

(Presented by Secretariat) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Specification Details: Coded Dash Number M28803/1 -MC PART LISTINGS MANUFACTURER'S DESIGNATION OR TYPE NUMBER TEST OR QUALIFICATION REFERENCE

Aviation Security (AVSEC) and Facilitation (FAL) 7.3 Other Aviation Security and Facilitation Matters

LT 2/8.23 SA186 Lima, 17April 2013

MEM. The. Bahamas (Commonwealth. Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism. in Drug Control. Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission (CICAD)

3rd FPL Monitoring Group Teleconference (October 24, 2014 at 15 UTC) Reference: 1. Minute of 2nd FPL Monitoring Group Teleconference (July 29, 2014)

Enhanced Time Based Separation (ETBS) & RECAT EU. Heathrow Crew Briefing

POST-IMPLEMENTATION COMMUNITY IMPACT REVIEW

Standards and procedures for the approval of performance-based navigation operations. (Presented by Colombia) SUMMARY

Operating Procedures. For the Provision of Air Traffic Control Services. RAF Mount Pleasant EGYP. Falklands Islands. RAF Monte Agradable EGYP

Agenda Item 2: Review of the Implementation of the Regional Air Navigation Plan. (Presented by the Secretariat) Summary

1.0 OUTLINE OF NOISE ANALYSIS...3

Continuous Improvement of the Global Air Traffic Management System

Latin America and the Caribbean: Fact Sheet on Economic and Social Indicators

EUR/SAM corridor airspace concept

TWELFTH AIR NAVIGATION CONFERENCE

MEM. Grenada. Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism. in Drug Control. Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission (CICAD)

Transitioning to ICAO Flight Plan why, when, what, how

International Civil Aviation Organization. MIDANPIRG Air Traffic Management Sub-Group. Fourth Meeting (ATM SG/4) (Amman, Jordan, 29 April 3 May 2018)

INTERNATIONAL CIVIL AVIATION ORGANIZATION. AFRICA - INDIAN OCEAN REGION REDUCED VERTICAL SEPARATION MINIMUM SEMINAR: (LAGOS, July 2004)

Regional air navigation planning and implementation performance framework: Review of programmes and projects

Operational implementation of new ATM automated systems and integration of the existing systems ADS-B IMPLEMENTATION IN GUYANA. (Presented by Guyana)

Mid-Air Collision SET Status & Next Steps. PA-RAST/29, Fort Lauderdale August 2017

Determining Airport Acceptance Rate (AAR) Mexico City Airport Case Study

POST-IMPLEMENTATION COMMUNITY IMPACT REVIEW

CRITICAL IMPLEMENTATION REQUIREMENTS FOR PBN, AIM QMS, MET QMS AND AERODROME CERTIFICATION. (Presented by the Secretariat)

Tariff regulations for the commercial airport Karlsruhe/Baden-Baden valid from April 1 st 2018

WHY IS BIRD STRIKE REPORT A KEY ISSUE FOR BIRD HAZARD PREVENTION?

2.2 Air Navigation Deficiencies ICAO CAR/SAM AIR NAVIGATION DEFICIENCIES DATABASE SIP. (Presented by the Secretariat) SUMMARY

INTERNATIONAL CIVIL AVIATION ORGANIZATION FOURTH MEETING OF DIRECTORS OF CIVIL AVIATION OF THE CENTRAL CARIBBEAN

INTERNATIONAL CIVIL AVIATION ORGANIZATION WESTERN AND CENTRAL AFRICA OFFICE. Thirteenth Meeting of the FANS I/A Interoperability Team (SAT/FIT/13)

According to the approval Ministry of Transport NRW dated June 21, Mr. Martin Dall Director Controlling / Logistics

Wednesday, 19 MAR 1:15 p.m 2:30 p.m. PRESENTED BY: Rich Nath BaseOps International

International Civil Aviation Organization THIRD MEETING OF THE GREPECAS ATM/CNS SUBGROUP ATM COMMITTEE AIR TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT TASK FORCE (ATFM/TF/3)

Draft Proposal for the Amendment of the Sub-Cap on Off-Peak Landing & Take Off Charges at Dublin Airport. Addendum to Commission Paper CP4/2003

Asia/Pacific Region A-CDM Planning

International Civil Aviation Organization

USE AND APPLICATION OF GNSS IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF NAVIGATION BASED ON PERFORMANCE IN ECUADOR

TVL DESK OF CONNECTICUT

UN-GGIM:Americas. UN-GGIM Expanded Bureau Meeting 7-9 December 2016, UN Headquarters New York. Rolando Ocampo President of UN-GGIM:Americas

Regional air navigation planning and implementation performance framework: Review of programmes and projects

NAM/CAR Regional Safety/Air Navigation/Aviation Security Implementation Matters 5.2 Effectiveness of air navigation implementation mechanisms

Airport Noise Management System Quarterly Report. Chicago Midway International Airport

(Presented by Dominican Republic) Objectives: Aviation safety and facilitation Air Navigation capacity and efficiency

Incorporating Information Literacy In Ibero-American University Libraries: Comparative Analysis of the Information from their Websites

TWELFTH AIR NAVIGATION CONFERENCE

Daniel Titelman Director Economic Development Division

Russian Federation ATM modernization program

International Civil Aviation Organization. Global and Regional Developments related to ATM GLOBAL AND REGIONAL DEVELOPMENTS RELARED TO ATM

Doing Business in Latin America and the Caribbean. Rita Ramalho Program Manager

International Civil Aviation Organization FIT-ASIA CRA ARRANGEMENTS, PROBLEM REPORTS, AND PERFORMANCE DATA ANALYSIS REPORTING

EU Trade policy in Latin America

Manual on Monitoring the Application of Performance-based Horizontal Separation Minima

LN 3/24.1 LT 2/6B.5-SA371 7 June 2010

Performance Metrics for Oceanic Air Traffic Management. Moving Metrics Conference Pacific Grove, California January 29, 2004 Oceanic Metrics Team

LIBERALISATION, OPEN SKIES AND BEYOUND

SUBURBAN O HARE COMMISSION ORD RUNWAY ROTATION PLAN ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

OPERATING HOURS AND FACILITATION PARAMETERS & PRINCIPLES FOR SALZBURG AIRPORT

LACNIC REPORT. ARIN XI - Memphis, USA. Raúl Echeberría LACNIC CEO < > ARIN XI

Transcription:

AP/ATM/5 05/06/03 International Civil Aviation Organization UNDP/ICAO Regional Project RLA/98/003 Transition to the CNS/ATM Systems in the CAR and SAM Regions Fifth Meeting/workshop of Air Traffic Management (ATM) Authorities and Planners for RVSM, RNAV routes and RNP implementation in the CAR and SAM Regions (AP/ATM/5 RVSM-RNAV-RNP) (Panama, Panama, 18 to 20 June 2003) Agenda Item 4: Review of the matters related to RVSM Implementation in the CAR/SAM Regions b) Safety and Airspace Monitoring Working Group (SAM/WG) Development of a comprehensive profile of operators and aircraft types expected to use CAR/SAM airspace where the Reduced Vertical Separation Minimum (RVSM) is provisionally planned to be applied (Prepared by CARSAMMA) (Presented by Brazil) Summary This working paper presents the results of analyzing a traffic sample collected during the period 1-30 December 2002 in the CAR/SAM airspace provisionally identified by the ICAO RVSM Implementation Task Force for implementation of the Reduced Vertical Separation Minimum (RVSM). The traffic sample is summarized in terms of observed airspace users, aircraft types and flight levels. 1. Introduction 1.1. At its Third Meeting, the ICAO Reduced Vertical Separation Minimum (RVSM) Task Force (RVSM TF) recognized that RVSM would also benefit traffic operating in the CAR/SAM Regions. In light of this recognition, the meeting decided that traffic movement data should be collected for the CAR/SAM Regions in order to provide an initial assessment of the composition of the traffic in this area. Accordingly,

AP/ATM/5-2 - States providing air traffic services in that portion of the CAR/SAM Regions agreed to collect traffic movement data for the month of December 2002. 1.2. As part of its deliberations at RVSM/TF/3, the Task Force reviewed the task list that should be followed to the RVSM implementation. The Task Force recognized that a sample of traffic must be collected to better know the CAR/SAM airspace. Therefore, the Task Force agreed that the traffic sample be presented, even if it is not fully received prior to RVSM/TF/5. As a result, the Task Force commissioned the CAR/SAM Regional Monitoring Agency (CARSAMMA) to conduct the work of data collection and analysis using a complete sample of traffic movements during the period of 1-30 December 2002. 1.3. These traffic samples are necessary to facilitate the readiness and safety assessments for the planned RVSM implementation. The States concerned were noted to be those located in CAR/SAM Regions. 1.4. The Task Force agreed on a one-month period from 1-30 December 2002 for collection of the traffic movement data to account for seasonal increases in traffic movement in the respective FIRs. 1.5. The purpose of this working paper is to present the results of collecting this one month sample. 2. Background 2.1 In accordance with the agreement of RVSM/TF/3, ATC units in a number of the implementing FIRs provided traffic samples from the target period. 2.2 Table 1 presents the information requested for an individual traffic movement, or flight, in the sample. ITEM EXAMPLE NECESSARY OR OPTIONAL Date (either month/day/year or 5/01/00 or 01/05/00 for NECESSARY day/month/year format) 1 May 2000 Aircraft call sign MAS704 NECESSARY Aircraft Type B734 NECESSARY Origin Aerodrome WMKK NECESSARY Destination Aerodrome RPLL NECESSARY Entry Fix into RVSM Airspace MESOK NECESSARY Time at Entry Fix 2:25 (or 0225) NECESSARY Flight Level at Entry Fix 330 NECESSARY Exit Fix from RVSM Airspace NISOR NECESSARY Time at Exit Fix 4:01 (or 0401) NECESSARY Flight Level at Exit Fix 330 NECESSARY First Fix Within RVSM Airspace MESOK OR G582 NECESSARY OR First Airway Within RVSM Airspace Time at First Fix 02:25 OR 0225 NECESSARY

- 3 - AP/ATM/5 Flight Level at First Fix 330 NECESSARY Second Fix Within RVSM MEVAS OR G577 Airspace OR Second Airway Within RVSM Airspace Time at Second Fix 02:50 OR 0250 NECESSARY Flight Level at Second Fix 330 NECESSARY (Continue with as many Fix/Time/Flight-Level entries as are required to describe the flight s movement within RVSM airspace) OPTIONAL Table 1. Information Required for a Flight in Traffic Sample 2.3 The following section presents the results of processing the traffic samples received by CARSAMMA prior to 21 May 2003. These results are presented in terms of summaries of operators, fleet composition and flight level utilization in CAR/SAM airspace, as obtained from the sample. 3. Discussion 3.1 Traffic movement data for operations in CAR/SAM airspace were received by CARSAMMA prior to 21 May 2003 from the following States/Organizations: Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia, Dominican Republic, Mexico, Chile, COCESNA, Cuba, Guyana, French Guyana, Paraguay, Peru, Suriname, Uruguay. Some data, due to the format or lack of information could not be treated. This analysis will need to be updated as more traffic movement data are received. 3.2 The total number of flights observed in the traffic samples is 88.255. 3.3 Figure 1 shows the top 19 operators, in terms of total operations, as observed in the traffic sample. These operators account for roughly 70% percent of the operations observed in the sample. The top 10, representing over 59 percent of total operations in the data sample, are VARIG(VRG), TAM(TAM),GOL(GLO), American Airlines(AAL), VASP(VSP), Aerolíneas Argentinas (ARG), Rio Sul (RSL), Línea Aérea Nacional de Chile (LAN), LAN Express (LXP) and Companhia Panamericana de Aviación(CMP). Analysis of the FIR samples shows that commercial operators conducted 94 percent of operations, with international general aviation operators and state operators responsible for 5.2 and 0.6 percent of operations, respectively.

AP/ATM/5-4 - 14000 12000 10000 11579 10677 Top 19 Operators in CARSAM Traffic Sample in Rank order 8000 6000 5346 5300 4602 4009 3999 4000 2000 0 VRG TAM GLO AAL General Aviation 3314 3037 2414 VSP ARG RSL LAN LXP CMP 2095 1432 1360 1305 COA UAL AJM TAI 1050 1026 1018 984 908 873 AUT IBE ACQ DAL NES Figure 1. Top 19 Operators Observed in CARSAM Airspace Traffic Sample Presented in Rank Order 3.4 The distribution of the top 15 aircraft types is shown in Figure 2. The top 15 aircraft types account for roughly 77% percent of the operations in the traffic sample. The top five aircraft types representing over 50% percent of the operations in the combined FIR samples are: B737, A320, B732, B733, and B763. Complete details of operations by aircraft type as observed in the sample are shown in Appendix A.

- 5 - AP/ATM/5 Top 15 Aircraft Types in CARSAM Traffic Sample in Rank order 16000 14000 13 52 9 12000 10 79 1 10000 8000 8003 6690 6000 5282 4000 2000 4098 2930 2788 2731 2348 2059 18 51 174 7 13 9 6 13 18 0 B737 A320 B732 B733 B763 F100 B735 B738 B752 A319 MD11 B722 E145 B762 B772 Figure 2. Top 15 Aircraft Types Observed in CARSAM Airspace Sample Presented in Rank Order 3.5 Approximately 45% percent of the flights in the FIR traffic samples contained flight level information. Figure 3 shows the flight level utilization for those flights with flight level data. Aircraft operating at flight levels below 290 and above 410 were eliminated from the analysis.

AP/ATM/5-6 - Flight Level Utilization for the CARSAM Traffic Sample 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 Figure 3. Flight Level Utilization in CARSAM Airspace Sample 4. Conclusions and Recommendations 4.1 This working paper has presented the results of analyzing traffic samples from CARSAM airspace where the RVSM is planned for implementation. The data were collected during the period 1-30 December 2002. Traffic samples included in this analysis are those received by CARSAMMA prior to 21 May 2003. 4.2 Analysis of the samples indicates that roughly 94 percent of operations were conducted by commercial operators, with international general aviation aircraft and state operators accounting for roughly 5.8 percent of the operations. 4.3 19 commercial operators accounted for roughly 70 percent of total operations in the traffic sample, with the top ten of these operators responsible for slightly more than 59 percent. 4.4 15 aircraft types accounted for roughly 77 percent of total operations in the traffic sample, with the top five aircraft types accounting for over 50 percent of the operations in the sample. 4.5 The Task Force is invited to review the results of the traffic movement data collection as presented in the body of the text and the appendices. 4.6 After completing its examination, the Task Force is further invited to note that additional traffic samples are expected to be received. This analysis should be updated as additional traffic samples are collected.

- 7 - AP/ATM/5 4.7 Some samples reached CARSAMMA in a different format than the one agreed upon. States are requested to send the data, in the next sample to be collected, in a date to be determined, in just one excel file containing all the data requested, including the name of the FIR where the data was collected so as to facilitate the identification.

A-1 AP/ATM/5 Appendix A Appendix A Aircraft Type Distribution for the CARSAM Airspace Traffic Sample (Over 99% of Aircraft Type/Groups Shown) TYPE TOTAL B737 13529 A320 10791 B732 8003 B733 6690 B763 5282 F100 4098 B735 2930 B738 2788 B752 2731 A319 2348 MD11 2059 B722 1851 E145 1747 B762 1396 B772 1318 MD80 1210 B767 1150 DC10 1078 A330 928 DC9 836 B742 783 B721 726 A343 726 B727 601 A340 568 LJ35 521 DC86 503 B747 464 A306 461

AP/ATM/5 A-2 B757 461 A310 444 MD88 421 A321 418 C560 408 B744 351 C550 332 B777 313 C525 281 H25B 263 B73S 255 B707 240 A30B 235 CL60 204 DC8 201 DC87 196 BE40 191 A332 189 C650 174 A342 171 B734 164 C56X 159 LJ25 157 H25A 149 A322 139 B743 138 L101 133 MD83 129 IL62 129 C500 128 LJ60 127 FK28 126 F900 123 GLF4 119 B764 114 LJ55 109

A-3 AP/ATM/5 LJ31 99 C750 85 MD82 75 B703 73 GLF5 67 BE20 66 GLF2 63 F2TH 62 M326 57 B350 57 A300 57 ASTR 56 B72Q 48 HS25 47 B73C 44 EA32 41 BJ40 39 MD81 37 B73B 36 FA50 34 LJ45 33 WW24 33 FA20 32 LR35 32 PRM1 32 C17 31 AT26 31 E135 31 SBR1 29 FA90 28 AJ25 26 G4 26 BE30 25 YK42 24 FA10 24 LJ24 24

AP/ATM/5 A-4 GALX 23 L29B 22 DC93 21 B73A 18 GLF3 18 B731 16 EA30 15 G5 15 LR25 15 L29A 14 DC85 14 BE35 14 MU30 12 GLEX 12 C441 12 N265 12 L1011 11 EA34 11 B736 10 C501 10 F5E 9 B720 9 C551 9 L329 8 C141 8 DA90 8 H25C 7 IL96 7 A333 7 DA20 6 C17A 6 WW25 6 IL76 6 E170 6 ZZZZ 6 HJ25 6

A-5 AP/ATM/5 EA31 6 F70 6 F5 6 CL64 5 R99B 5 R99A 5 DA50 5 G2 5 LR55 5 B774 5 E140 5 C5 4 PAY3 4 SBR2 4 R35A 4 A124 4 LR36 4 LR24 4 LR31 3 E120 3 G3 3 HS80 3 G100 3 MU3 3 E25A 3 B753 3 C600 3 H525 2 B200 2 GLFS 2 B300 2 B340 2 C135 2 LR60 2 B773 2 LJ29 2

AP/ATM/5 A-6 L25 2 JCOM 2 MD87 2 LJ36 2 K35R 2 E326 2 F50 2 VU93 2 AE32 2 LR45 2 AC90 2 F103 2 C260 2 R35 2 F20 2 G2GL 2 VU35 2 MB88 1 SW3 1 SW4 1 MI3 1 MD86 1 N742 1 YK40 1 A25B 1 B728 1 B701 1 ASTRA 1 PC10 1 AT60 1 AF1 1 PA50 1 SBR 1 AC21 1 SBRI 1 PA42 1

A-7 AP/ATM/5 PA10 1 PAYE 1 RA 1 AC6L 1 A323 1 AC69 1 F5EL 1 C137 1 G4 1 C171 1 C245 1 C402 1 FA33 1 C505 1 C51 1 B761 1 F800 1 BE9L 1 F500 1 F28 1 CL61 1 CL65 1 EU93 1 DC12 1 ES31 1 EA33 1 A1 1 FA24 1 H25 1 LR26 1 LJ56 1 LJ51 1 B73Q 1 K137 1 B751 1 IA63 1

AP/ATM/5 A-8 TYPE TOTAL E143 1 B765 1 GII 1 H500 1 BFMJ 1 GULF 1 GLX 1 BE350 1 GLFR 1 BE50 1 BE55 1 BE80 1 BE90 1 LR31A 1 B76Q 1