AERONAUTICAL SURVEYS & INSTRUMENT FLIGHT PROCEDURES

Similar documents
Saint Petersburg-Clearwater International Airport. Airspace & Instrument Approach Analysis

Appendix C AIRPORT LAYOUT PLANS

1.1.3 Taxiways. Figure 1-15: Taxiway Data. DRAFT Inventory TYPICAL PAVEMENT CROSS-SECTION LIGHTING TYPE LENGTH (FEET) WIDTH (FEET) LIGHTING CONDITION

agis a brief overview

Appendix E NextGen Appendix

FLIGHT OPERATIONS PANEL

TANZANIA CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY AIR NAVIGATION SERVICES INSPECTORATE. Title: CONSTRUCTION OF VISUAL AND INSTRUMENT FLIGHT PROCEDURES

Agenda: SASP SAC Meeting 3

MetroAir Virtual Airlines

DRAFT MASTER PLAN UPDATE

REGULATION No. 10/2011 ON APPROVAL OF FLIGHT PROCEDURES INCLUDING SID-s AND STAR-s. Article 1 Scope of Application

Source: Chippewa Valley Regional Airport ASOS, Period of Record

According to FAA Advisory Circular 150/5060-5, Airport Capacity and Delay, the elements that affect airfield capacity include:

Initiated By: AFS-400

IAC 2011 Cape Town, October th

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION. National Policy

FAA Update. Dakota-Minnesota (DMA) Airports District Office. Federal Aviation Administration. Presented to: By: Date: South Dakota Airports Conference

AUGUST 2017 GNSS REVIEW. Survey Economics Chances of success. Mobile Mapping Airport scanning. Stag s Leap Winery Pre-construction plan

RISING PERFORMANCE. Civil aviation is an outlier. It s BY ERIK DAHLBERG

FACILITY REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY OF KEY ISSUES OVERVIEW

CFIT-Procedure Design Considerations. Use of VNAV on Conventional. Non-Precision Approach Procedures

Preliminary Findings of Proposed Alternative

Wide Area Augmentation System (WAAS) and Local Area Augmentation System (LAAS) Update

EXPLANATION OF TPP TERMS AND SYMBOLS

SUPPLEMENT A33 TO THE AIRPLANE FLIGHT MANUAL DA 40 NG. Integrated Avionics System Garmin G1000,

Geospatial Data Collection for the FAA Airports GIS Program

RNP AR APCH Approvals: An Operator s Perspective

SBAS Frequently Asked Questions

APPENDIX D FEDERAL AVIATION REGULATIONS, PART 77

ORDINANCE NO. _2013-

Aerodrome Obstacle Survey Information Checks

Flight Evaluation and Validation of RNP AR/SAAAR Instrument Flight Procedures

CATCODE ] CATCODE

OBSTACLE IDENTIFICATION SURFACE CALCULATION TOOL (OIS CT) FOR AIRPORT AIRSPACE OBSTRUCTION ANALYSES AT CIVIL AIRPORTS IN THE UNITED STATES

PLUME RISE ASSESSMENTS

Update on FAA Standard Operating Procedures (SOP)

SBAS as a solution for safe approaches in New Zealand and Australia

Guidance for Complexity and Density Considerations - in the New Zealand Flight Information Region (NZZC FIR)

AIRPORTS GIS UPDATE. Federal Aviation Administration.

Operational Benefits, Affordability and Availability

TERMS OF REFERENCE (Revision 9) Special Committee (SC) 213 Enhanced Flight Vision Systems/Synthetic Vision Systems

Runway Length Analysis Prescott Municipal Airport

Consideration will be given to other methods of compliance which may be presented to the Authority.

50 Ways to Improve Your Airport: Engaging Airport Management on Key Issues

FAA Requirements for Engine-out Procedures and Obstacle Clearance

Airports and UAS: Integrating UAS into Airport Infrastructure and Planning

PRO LINE FUSION INTEGRATED AVIONICS SYSTEM. Pro Line Fusion on Gulfstream G280: Your direct path to see and access more.

RSAT RUNUP ANALYSIS 1. INTRODUCTION 2. METHODOLOGY

IMPROVEMENT OF INSTRUMENT APPROACH PROCEDURES

Approach Specifications

Yellowstone Regional Airport Operational Capability Assessment

Chapter 8.0 Implementation Plan


RAAC/15-WP/14 International SUMMARY REFERENCES. A Safety

Hartford-Brainard Airport Potential Runway Closure White Paper

Reliever Airports: NOISE ABATEMENT PLAN Flying Cloud Airport (FCM)

Promoting EGNSS Operational Adoption in BLUEMED FAB CYPRUS

South Dakota Airports Conference

Airport Safety Management Systems: Integrating Planning Into the Process

Airport Obstruction Standards

LOW VISIBILITY OPERATION

Using LiDAR for Precise Vegetation Management

PBN Syllabus Helicopter. Learning Objective. phase Theoretical PBN concept. in ICAO Doc 9613)

Chapter 4.0 Facility Requirements

Spatio-temporal Data Analysis and Visualization in Enterprise Level Automated Application

ARP Forecast Review Critical Aircraft Data Sources

Appendix B Ultimate Airport Capacity and Delay Simulation Modeling Analysis

INSTRUMENT RATING STUDENT RECORD

Policy Letter (PL) Global Positioning System (GPS) Equipment and Installation Approval

ADVISORY CIRCULAR ON CALCULATION OF DECLARED DISTANCES

IFR SEPARATION USING RADAR

Chapter Six ALP Drawings. Tacoma Narrows Airport. Master Plan Update

Chapter Seven COST ESTIMATES AND FUNDING A. GENERAL

Executive Summary. MASTER PLAN UPDATE Fort Collins-Loveland Municipal Airport

SUPPLEMENT A33 TO THE AIRPLANE FLIGHT MANUAL DA 62. Integrated Avionics System Garmin G1000 and. G1000 NXi, SBAS and P-RNAV Operation

14 CFR Aeronautics and Space CHAPTER I FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (CONTINUED)

AIRSPACE PROTECTION. Guidance and considerations for development in the vicinity of Ohio s airports and heliports

STUDY OVERVIEW MASTER PLAN GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION

ICAO Standards. Airfield Information Signs. ICAO Annex 14, 4th Edition Aerodrome Design and Operations

Enabling Civilian Low-Altitude Airspace and Unmanned Aerial System (UAS) Operations. Unmanned Aerial System Traffic Management (UTM)

SBAS IS the only effective solution for safe approaches at every airport in Australia and New Zealand NZ Airports Assn 10 th Sept 2015

AIRCRAFT INCIDENT REPORT

Understanding Required Navigation Performance (RNP) and Area Navigation (RNAV)Operations

From AIS To AIM. Agenda. Agenda. Jack Hsu Mark Varellas

Airport Master Plan for. Brown Field Municipal Airport PAC Meeting #3

FLIGHT OPERATIONS PANEL (FLTOPSP)

GREENER SKIES OVER SEATTLE INITIATIVE

Minnesota Airports Conference

SUMMARY: This action modifies Class E surface airspace and Class E airspace extending

The purpose of this Demand/Capacity. The airfield configuration for SPG. Methods for determining airport AIRPORT DEMAND CAPACITY. Runway Configuration

Pro Line Fusion integrated avionics system. Pro Line Fusion on Embraer Legacy 450 and 500: Business-jet technology designed with tomorrow in mind.

Operators may need to retrofit their airplanes to ensure existing fleets are properly equipped for RNP operations. aero quarterly qtr_04 11

AERODROME OPERATING MINIMA

B GEORGIA INFRASTRUCTURE REPORT CARD AVIATION RECOMMENDATIONS DEFINITION OF THE ISSUE. Plan and Fund for the Future:

AEROVISION AUGMENTED REALITY AIRPORTS IN 3D Young Professionals Innovation Competition Daniel Schoenberg, RS&H Jill Geboy, Jacobs Engineering Daniel

Airport Master Plan for Montgomery-Gibbs Executive Airport PAC Meeting #3

Airport 20 to 1 Approach Surface

Overview ICAO Standards and Recommended Practices for Aerodrome Safeguarding

SITE ELEVATION AMSL...Ground Elevation in feet AMSL STRUCTURE HEIGHT...Height Above Ground Level OVERALL HEIGHT AMSL...Total Overall Height AMSL

Transcription:

AERONAUTICAL SURVEYS & INSTRUMENT FLIGHT PROCEDURES Current as of November 2012 ALASKA AVIATION SYSTEM PLAN UPDATE Prepared for: State of Alaska Department of Transportation & Public Facilities Division of Statewide Aviation 4111 Aviation Drive Anchorage, Alaska 99502 INTRODUCTION In the interest of creating a safer more reliable aviation system, the Alaska Department of Transportation & Public Facilities, through the Alaska Aviation System Plan, is developing a prioritized list of airports recommended to receive aeronautical surveys new or improved instrument flight procedures (IFPs). Aeronautical surveys instrument flight procedures are two distinct matters that, as discussed in the context of this fact sheet, integrate to create greater safety, reliability, efficiency at airports. Information gathered from aeronautical surveys contributes to a wide number of aviation applications, one of which is the development of IFPs. Similarly, IFPs make use of aeronautical survey data, but there are many additional elements involved in the creation of an IFP. This fact sheet will briefly outline: The primary parties involved in aeronautical surveys IFP development in Alaska, The definition applications of aeronautical surveys, The definition applications of IFPs. Prepared by: DOWL HKM 4041 B Street Anchorage, Alaska 99503 (907) 562-2000 Contents: Introduction 1 Who Is Involved? 1 Aeronautical Surveys 2 Instrument Flight Procedures 3 WAAS 4 WHO IS INVOLVED? Alaska Department of Transportation & Public Facilities (DOT&PF): Alaska DOT&PF s role is to evaluate the system of airports for IFP needs; conduct aeronautical surveys; operate, maintain improve airports; coordinate with the FAA, other agencies, stakeholders. Contact: Jessica Della Croce, 907-269-0728, jessica.dellacroce@alaska.gov Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Airports District Office (ADO): The ADO is responsible for administering the Airport Improvement Program (AIP) grants to fund aeronautical surveys when surveys are required for completion of capital improvement projects. Contact: Gabriel Mahns, 907-271-3665, gabriel.mahns@faa.gov FAA Navigation Services: Navigation Services has been the primary provider of funding for Wide Area Augmentation System (WAAS) surveys WAAScapable flight procedure development publishing. The WAAS Program Office has historically procured airport obstruction surveys for runways which are promising cidates for subsequent WAAScapable instrument flight procedure development. Contact: JoAnn Y. Ford, 202-493-4704, JoAnn.Y.Ford@faa.gov National Geodetic Survey (NGS): NGS is contracted by the FAA to validate verify survey data provided by contracted surveyors is compliant with FAA specifications. NGS validates verifies data collected for surveys funded through both the AIP the WAAS Program Office. Contact: Mark Howard 301-713-2685, mark.howard@noaa.gov Regional Airspace Procedures Team (RAPT): Composed of FAA Divisions of Airports, Flight Procedures, Flight Stards, Air Traffic Control, this group reviews requests for IFPs approves or denies them for development. If approved, the group then recommends the IFP to the FAA s Oklahoma City office for design, flight inspection, publication. Contact: Kyle Christiansen, 907-271-5187, kyle.r.christiansen@faa.gov

AERONAUTICAL SURVEYS Page 2 The FAA refers to any survey related to airports or surrounding areas as an aeronautical survey. What is an Aeronautical Survey? The FAA refers to any survey related to airports or surrounding areas as an aeronautical survey. There are many types of aeronautical surveys which serve a variety of end purposes. An aeronautical survey gathers safety critical navigation data as well as data not critical to navigation but necessary for planning, design construction of airport improvement projects. Aeronautical surveys have been performed by NOAA s National Geodetic Survey (NGS) since the 1920s, but the NGS survey requirements have evolved. The FAA has published geospatial Advisory Circulars (ACs) 105/5300-16, -17, -18 guiding the collection of survey data for airports. There are eight (8) types of aeronautical surveys defined in Table 2.1 of AC 105/5300-18, ranging from small construction projects on lside to full-scale airport mapping databases or Aeronautical Surveys that are funded through the AIP. The FAA currently requires surveys be conducted according to stards set forth in the geospatial ACs for all obstruction surveys to develop new or change existing instrument flight procedures with any project changing safety-critical data including runway end position NAVAIDS. The FAA is requiring aeronautical surveys compliant with the geospatial ACs be incorporated into all projects at Primary airports certain Non-Primary airports by 2015. Alaska is currently receiving funding to complete approximately five (5) st-alone surveys per year in addition to surveys being conducted through other capital improvement projects. Surveys conducted using AIP funds must be programmed appropriately with all other airport capital improvement investments. Surveys support a wide variety of aviation applications including planning, design, engineering, construction of airport improvement projects the development of airport approach departure instrument flight procedures. What is Aeronautical Survey information used for? Surveys support a wide variety of aviation applications. Airport sponsors the FAA use survey information in support of planning, design, engineering, construction of airport improvement projects. The FAA additionally uses survey information What is a WAAS Survey? A WAAS survey is a type of aeronautical survey that gathers safety critical data needed to develop specific WAAS-enabled flight procedures. WAAS surveys are much less expensive than full aeronautical surveys since the purpose of the survey is focused the scope of data gathered is less than that prescribed by the geospatial ACs. These surveys focus on Where are we today? As of March 1, 2012 the following surveys have been completed in the State of Alaska: 27 Airports with WAAS Surveys 107 Airports with Aeronautical Surveys to establish airport approach departure instrument flight procedures, determine takeoff weights, update aeronautical publications. Aeronautical surveys are an important source of quality assured highaccuracy survey data used in the development of FAA s Next Generation Air Transportation documenting Global Positioning System (GPS) coordinates of the runway obstructions on around the airport, especially obstructions along extended runway centerlines. FAA s Office of Navigation Services has been the primary provider of funding for WAAS surveys the subsequently developed IFPs. The number of surveys funded through the WAAS Program is predicated Alaska DOT&PF continues to ensure all regional hub airports have current survey data is also working to ensure that any airport with an improvement project includes a survey when practical. DOT&PF is currently working with the FAA other System (NextGen). The FAA is transitioning an airspace navigational system founded primarily on ground-based navigational equipment to this future NextGen system founded primarily on satellite-based navigational technologies. upon the amount of funding provided by Congress. This funding is expected to expire in 2014. Although the WAAS surveys are not conducted by the State of Alaska do not impact the AIP funding, the State has a role in helping the WAAS Program Office identify runway ends to survey consider for IFP development. stakeholders to prioritize all other airports for surveys in support of IFP development airport planning, design, construction.

INSTRUMENT FLIGHT PROCEDURES Page 3 What is an Instrument Flight Procedure (IFP)? An instrument flight procedure (IFP) is a series of predetermined maneuvers for the instrument-supported guidance of an aircraft in lowvisibility conditions from initial approach to ling or to a point from which ling may be made visually. Simply stated, these procedures allow a pilot to safely guide the aircraft to the runway when the weather conditions do not allow for a ling under visual flight rules (VFR). Instrument flight procedures enhance safety, efficiency, reliability of access to airports. Some of Alaska s airports are currently accessible only under Visual Meteorological Conditions (i.e., good weather), which restricts access when weather systems create reduced visibility. Making these airports accessible under Instrument Meteorological Conditions through the development of instrument flight procedures improves the safety reliability of access. Aeronautical surveys are a critical first step in providing airports with approved flight IFPs lower weather minimums that create a safer more reliable aircraft operating environment. The airport users depend on access to runways in inclement weather benefit greatly when flight procedures are improved. Weather minimums in the context of instrument flight procedures define: Visibility horizontal distance, Minimum descent altitude or cloud ceiling vertical distance What are weather minimums? Weather minimums are the lowest visibility conditions under which an aircraft may be flown under visual flight rules (VFR). VFR flight is based on the principle of being able to see avoid. Weather minimums in the context of instrument flight procedures define: Visibility horizontal distance, Minimum descent altitude or cloud ceiling vertical distance. The lower the minimums, the more likely the airport can be accessed during inclement weather conditions with instruments on board the aircraft. Many elements interact to create the lowest possible minimums elements such as weather information, terrain, communications, avionics (navigational equipment in the cockpit), airfield characteristics, airfield lighting. The lowest minimums may be achieved where the obstacle environment is benign (i.e., no obstacles) the airport infrastructure requirements are met (per AC 150/5340-1 AC 150/5300-13). Through the Next Generation Air Transportation System (NextGen) technology, lower minimums can be achieved without the need for expensive ground equipment, allowing Alaskan airports to achieve lower minimums improved instrument flight procedures.

WIDE AREA AUGMENTATION SYSTEM (WAAS) Page 4 What is WAAS? WAAS is an extremely accurate navigation system developed for civil aviation. WAAS is a combination of equipment installed on the ground, in orbit, in an aircraft, which allows accurate GPS-based navigation during all phases of flight. Unlike traditional ground-based navigation aids, WAAS covers nearly all of the National Airspace System (NAS). WAAS has the potential to provide horizontal vertical navigation for approach operations at nearly any qualifying airport. Aircraft using WAAS-capable receivers can access runways in poor weather conditions with minimums as low as 200 feet. Generally, runways must be at least 60 feet wide, 3200 feet long, designated as instrument runways before they will be considered viable cidates for a WAAS survey IFP development. However, waivers can be granted, on a case by case basis, for some runways not meeting these requirements. WAAS is an extremely accurate navigation system developed for civil aviation. WAAS has the potential to provide horizontal vertical navigation for approach operations at nearly any airport. What are the aviation benefits of WAAS? The WAAS allows GPS to be used as a primary means of navigation from takeoff through Category I precisionlike approach. The WAAS broadcast message improves GPS signal accuracy from 100 meters to approximately 7 meters. The benefits of WAAS to civil aviation are substantial. WAAS improves the efficiency of aviation operations due to enabling: Increased safety Greater capacity: Reduced minimums, allowing for operations in greater range of weather Improved routing Reduced aircraft separation stards which allow increased capacity in a given airspace without increased risk Significant government cost savings : No navigational equipment on the airport Elimination of maintenance costs associated with older, more expensive ground-based navigation aids Near precision approach capability to certain runways Reduced simplified equipment on board aircraft What are LPV LP approach procedures? Localizer Performance with Vertical guidance (LPV) Localizer Performance (LP) approach procedures are specific types of instrument flight procedures that rely on the WAAS on board receivers. The LPV approach procedure provides both vertical hori- zontal guidance to the pilot. From a pilot s viewpoint, an LPV approach is operationally equivalent to a Category I ILS approach (a precision approach using instruments on board the aircraft ground-based navigational equipment on the airport). An LPV approach procedure can provide a minimum descent altitude as low as 200 feet. The LP approach procedure is a non-precision approach with lateral guidance but without vertical guidance. LP approach procedures will provide the lowest possible minimum descent altitude (MDA) at airports where obstructions /or infrastructure prevent an LPV procedure. An LP approach procedure can provide a minimum descent altitude as low as 300 feet.

Page 5 Where is WAAS available in Alaska? The following two figures depict LPV LP coverage areas in the state of Alaska. The yellow colored areas on the map depict where coverage is available. As shown, airports nearly anywhere in Alaska are potentially able to make use of WAAS capabilities. Figure 1: LPV Coverage Map The Localizer Performance with Vertical guidance (LPV) approach procedure provides both vertical horizontal guidance to the pilot. An LPV approach procedure can provide a minimum descent altitude as low as 200 feet. The Localizer Performance (LP) approach procedure is a non-precision approach with lateral guidance but without vertical guidance. An LP approach procedure can provide a minimum descent altitude as low as 300 feet. Figure 2: LP Coverage Map

Page 6 Instrument flight procedures the lowest possible minimums are affected by: Obstacle penetrations in the glide slope What is required of an airport to support LPV LP approach procedures? In addition to showing desired instrument runway designation on an approved Airport Layout Plan (ALP), there are infrastructure airport environment requirements for LPV LP approach procedures. These requirements are defined in AC150/5300-13 tables A16-1B A16-1C, respectively. The What is required of an aircraft to use LPV LP approach procedures? specific requirements for a given approach procedure depend on the minimums. In summary, these approach procedures the lowest possible minimums are affected by: Obstacle penetrations in the glide slope Airfield characteristics Runway length (at least 3200 feet, with some exceptions) Both LPV LP approach procedures utilize WAAS signals therefore a WAAS-capable receiver must be installed on board the aircraft to fly the Runway width (at least 60 feet) Parallel taxiway Approach lighting Runway lighting markings Survey airport airspace analysis based on AC150/5300-18 A certified altimeter source approach. The WAAS avionics must be approved for LPV LP to fly both approach procedures. Airfield characteristics -Runway length -Runway width -Parallel taxiway Approach lighting Runway lighting markings Survey airport airspace analysis A certified altimeter source How do you request an instrument flight procedure? Once the appropriate data is collected, the airport sponsor, state aviation authority, user group or user must submit an official request for development of the IFP to the FAA. An application, which can be retrieved from the FAA web page at http://aeronav.faa.gov/ index.asp?xml=aeronav/pit/ ifpform, must be completed submitted to the RAPT for review. This review incorporates FAA Divisions of Airports, Flight Procedures, Flight Stards, Air Traffic Control to provide a single coordinated review of the request. Once approved by the RAPT, the priority for publication is established the procedure development scheduled. With the request, including the current survey the RAPT s schedule recommendation, the package is sent to the FAA s flight procedures group located in Oklahoma City. Here, the procedure is designed, checked, hed off for flight inspection. After successful flight inspection, the procedure is scheduled for charting in the next available cycle. This process typically takes 12 to 18 months for completion. Where are we today? As of November 7, 2012 the following WAAS-capable flight procedures have been developed in the State of Alaska: 61 LPV Approach Flight Procedures 19 LP Approach Flight Procedures Alaska DOT&PF continues to ensure all regional hub airports have instrument flight procedures with the lowest possible minimums. DOT&PF is currently working with the FAA airport users to prioritize all other airports for surveys to support instrument flight procedure development to recommend those with current survey data for LPV LP approach procedure development.