Application of Wake Turbulence Separation at London Heathrow. Paul Johnson Development Manager NATS Heathrow

Similar documents
CHAPTER 5 SEPARATION METHODS AND MINIMA

Enhanced Time Based Separation

Enhanced Time Based Separation (ETBS) & RECAT EU. Heathrow Crew Briefing

IFR SEPARATION USING RADAR

Current practice of separation delivery at major European airports ATM R&D Seminar, June 2015, Lisbon

WAKE TURBULENCE SEPARATION MINIMA

Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) for BAGHDAD (ORBI)

Wake Turbulence Standards

IFR SEPARATION WITHOUT RADAR

SAFE WINGS. This issue WAKE-UP TO WAKE TURBULENCE. * For Internal Circulation Only

CENTER FOR AIR TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH Education, Analysis and Research for the Next Frontier. Airport Capacity. Outline/Notes for Class

SULAYMANIYAH INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT MATS CHAPTER 11

S2 Tower Controller. Allama Iqbal Int l Airport Lahore ( OPLA ) June 2016 Pakistan vacc

NATS LTD. - IN CONFIDENCE

NATS TMA Programmes. #120_AF1 LAMP Phase 1A and #119_AF1 Manchester TMA. Mark McLaren

Airfield Capacity Prof. Amedeo Odoni

Dubai contest LIDAR in Dubai DANS Wake Vortex campaign DXB Operations Dependent Diagonal Approach implementation Phase RPAT Approach concept

CAUTION: WAKE TURBULENCE

Point Merge & RECAT-EU at Leipzig-Halle Airport (EDDP) DFS Center Munich

LFPG / Paris-Charles de Gaulle / CDG

IFR FLIGHT BRIEFING. This IFR flight briefing presentation has been made concise and simple in order to easily handle the IFR flight preparation.

Noise Abatement Arrival Procedures at Louisville International Airport. Prof. John-Paul Clarke Georgia Institute of Technology

ATC-Wake: Integrated Air Traffic Control Wake Vortex Safety and Capacity System

WAKE VORTEX MEASUREMENTS TO SUPPORT SAFETY ASSESSMENT OF THE SIMULTANEOUS OFFSET INSTRUMENT APPROACH PROCEDURE AT SFO

TANZANIA CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY SAFETY REGULATION CHECKLIST FOR INSPECTION OF SURFACE MOVEMENT GUIDANCE CONTROL SYSTEM (SMGCS)

WakeNet3-Europe Concepts Workshop

Wake Vortex R&D. Status Briefing. NBAA Convention. Federal Aviation Administration. By: Steve Lang Date: September 2007

ATSAW. (Airborne Traffic Situational Awareness) Presented by Laurent VIDAL - Surveillance systems manager Support to sales & programs

Application of the reduced runway separation minima at the Sheremetyevo airport RUSSIAN FEDERATION

Performance monitoring report 2017/18

Effective: AIRCRAFT WAKE TURBULENCE

IVAO Switzerland Division

SOURDINE II EU- 5FW project on Noise Abatement Procedures. Overall view. Ruud den Boer / Collin Beers Department: ATM & Airports

Modernising UK Airspace 2025 Vision for Airspace Tools and Procedures. Controller Pilot Symposium 24 October 2018

Updates to Procedures at St. John s International Airport

Design Airspace (Routes, Approaches and Holds) Module 11 Activity 7. European Airspace Concept Workshops for PBN Implementation

AIR/GROUND SIMULATION OF TRAJECTORY-ORIENTED OPERATIONS WITH LIMITED DELEGATION

Airport Engineering Lectures

17 SYMBOLS Map Page Symbols. The following tables describe the symbols that are found on the Map display.

MINIMUM FLIGHT ALTITUDES

USA Near-Term Progress for Closely Spaced Parallel Runways

AIRCRAFT NOISE INFORMATION PACK: CANNING VALE

AIR LAW AND ATC PROCEDURES

Controller Training Case Study Implementation of new RNP AR APCH for RWY07 (North Circuit) at HKIA

POST-IMPLEMENTATION COMMUNITY IMPACT REVIEW

ATMM. Air Traffic Management Manual. Air Traffic Management Manual VACC AUSTRIA LOVV ATMM Air Traffic Management Manual

Making the World A better place to live SFO

KSNA HIGH. John Wayne Airport Orange County Santa Ana, California, United States. Diagram #1: Noise Monitor map and noise sensitive areas

Date: 5 November East of Frankfurt/Main

Heathrow DET09 Steeper Departure Trial. Interim Trial Presentation Trial Data: January - June 2018

Wake Turbulence All aircraft produce wake turbulence, which consists of wake vortices formed any time an airfoil is producing lift.

Stanfield VOR Procedures

The aim of any instrument approach is to allow the aircraft to safely descend to a low altitude in order to become visual.

NOISE ABATEMENT PROCEDURES

Modeling the Impact of the A380 on Airport Capacity

VATSIM-UK Essex RTS STANSTED CROSS THE POND PILOT GUIDE 25th October 2014

EFFECTIVE NOTAM KOUN SPECIAL FLIGHT PROCEDURES 09/08 NORMAN, OK

DIRECCION DE PERSONAL AERONAUTICO DPTO. DE INSTRUCCION PREGUNTAS Y OPCIONES POR TEMA

Wake Turbulence: Managing Safety and Capacity. Bram Elsenaar co-ordinator of the European Thematic Network WakeNet2-Europe

KPGD HIGH. Punta Gorda Airport Punta Gorda, Florida, United States. Diagram #1: KPGD Departures. NOISE ABATEMENT PROCEDURES by Whispertrack

Su A. rts ssion. Issue 1. Prepared by

INTERNATIONAL VIRTUAL AVIATION ORGANISATION CANADIAN AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL PHRASEOLOGY ATC OPERATIONS DECEMBER 2016 BY: MATHIEU LAFLAMME

TRAVIS AIRSPACE. For more information visit the Travis AFB Midair Collision Avoidance (MACA) public website at:

Sustainable Aviation & Airports AOA Operations and Safety Conference, June 2014 Jonathon Counsell, SA Chair, Head of Environment, British Airways

Appendix B Ultimate Airport Capacity and Delay Simulation Modeling Analysis

HOLDING PATTERN USING VOR

Don-Jacques OULD FERHAT VP Airspace and Airlines Services. Airbus. PBN Safety programs

Work Package 1: Final Project Report Appendix C: Analysis of the current situation in the Frankfurt TMA

Chapter 6. Nonradar. Section 1. General DISTANCE

POST-IMPLEMENTATION COMMUNITY IMPACT REVIEW

Noise Abatement Summary Airline performance against AIP Noise Abatement Criteria

Terminal- Area Opera.ons Prof. Hamsa Balakrishnan

VIENNA INTL. AIRPORT PILOT BRIEFING

Potential benefits in the application of Time Based Separation concept at Lisbon Airport

GATWICK ARRIVALS REVIEW REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS

NOTE TO MEMBERS #24 22 MAR 2017

Chapter 6. Airports Authority of India Manual of Air Traffic Services Part 1

Performance monitoring report for first half of 2016

Subject : Correct application of the strategic lateral offset procedures

CDA Continuous Descent Approach

The SESAR Airport Concept

Noise Compatibility Year End, 2012

Arriving and departing aircraft at Edinburgh Airport

KPAO HIGH. Palo Alto Arpt Of Santa Clara Co Airport Palo Alto, California, United States Diagram #1: Noise Abatement Procedures All Runways

TWELFTH WORKING PAPER. AN-Conf/12-WP/137. International ICAO. developing RNAV 1.1. efficiency. and terminal In line.

INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION OF AIR TRAFFIC CONTROLLERS ASSOCIATIONS. Agenda Item: B.5.12 IFATCA 09 WP No. 94

Crosswind dependent separations and update on TBS concept (transitional step)

Aerodrome Control Guide

ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS FROM IMPROVED OPERATIONAL MEASURES. Guido Kerkhofs Director ATM Programmes EUROCONTROL

Instrument Proficiency Check Flight Record

Continuous Descent? And RNAV Arrivals

Section 3. Wake Turbulence

IVAO Nordic Region November 2018 PILOT BRIEFING ROVANIEMI X-MAS FLY-IN

Flight Operations in Low Visibility Conditions

FUTURE AIRSPACE CHANGE

USE OF RADAR IN THE APPROACH CONTROL SERVICE

Noise from Arriving Aircraft. An Industry Code of Practice

Pilot Briefing Document Cross The Pond 2013 Heathrow Airport EGLL/LHR

SECTION 4 - APPROACH CONTROL PROCEDURES

Number April 2016

Transcription:

Application of Wake Turbulence Separation at London Heathrow Paul Johnson Development Manager NATS Heathrow

Heathrow Vital Statistics Passengers per year 67 Million Aircraft movements per year 470,000 Traffic Mix 31% Heavy, 69% Medium or below Typical Busiest Day 1350 1382 Hour 88-92 100 Inbounds 42-44 Outbounds 46-48

Noise Restrictions Runways 27L & 27R Runways 09L & 09R Runway Alternation: Landing runway changes at 15:00 06:00 to 15:00 15:00 to 23:30 Landing Runway 09L Departure Runway 09R TEAM In peak periods allows up to 6 additional landing aircraft on the Departure runway

Wake Categories LIGHT <7,000kg MEDIUM >7,000kg <136,000kg ICAO HEAVY >136,000kg NATS LIGHT SMALL LOWER MEDIUM UPPER MEDIUM HEAVY <17,000kg >17,000kg <40,000kg >40,000kg <104,000kg >104,000kg <162,000kg >162,000kg Pa34 DA20 DHC7 FK70 A318 A321 B757 A300 FK100 TU54 B707 B747 DC8

Separation Requirements are; LEADER FOLLOWER SPACING (NM) Heavy Heavy Heavy Heavy Heavy Heavy Upper Medium Lower Medium Small Light 4 5 5 6 7 Upper Medium Upper Medium Upper Medium Upper Medium Upper Medium Heavy Upper Medium Lower Medium Small Light 3 4 4 6 Notes: Lower Medium Lower Medium Lower Medium Lower Medium Lower Medium Small Small Small Small Small Heavy Upper Medium Lower Medium Small Light Heavy Upper Medium Lower Medium Small Light 3 5 3 Wake Vortex Separation applied to 4DME from touchdown. When the lead aircraft is inside 4DME and a reduction of ½ mile or more in the required wake vortex separation occurs, the pilot of the following aircraft must be informed. Heathrow Final Director (FIN) responsible for providing appropriate spacing to achieve this. Tower controller responsible for informing FIN of requirements related to runway occupancy time. Light Light Light Light Light Heavy Upper Medium Lower Medium Small Light Separation for Wake Vortex reasons is not necessary. Minimum radar separation on final approach 3nm. 2.5nm minimum radar separation can be applied under specified conditions.

Wake Encounters by Altitude 80 70 Number of Encounters between 2000 and 2004 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 <=500 <=1000 <=2000 <=3000 <=4000 <=5000 <=6000 <=7000 <=8000 <=9000 <=10000 Altitude of Encounter (ft)

Luton Stansted H H Heathrow H London City 10 Nm 20 Nm 30 Nm Gatwick

BNN LAM London City Heathrow OCK BIG

BNN LAM London City Heathrow OCK BIG

BNN LAM London City Heathrow OCK BIG

BNN LAM London City Heathrow OCK BIG

BNN LAM London City Heathrow OCK BIG

BNN LAM Intermediate North (INT N) Final Director (FIN) Heathrow London City Intermediate South (INT S) OCK BIG

8,000ft and above BNN 220kts 220kts LAM 5,000ft - 8,000ft 8,000ft and above 160kts 180kts London City Heathrow 3,000ft 4,000ft OCK BIG

Heathrow 4000ft 3000ft 2500ft H 9 Miles 11 Miles 13 Miles London City

Heathrow 4000ft 3000ft 2500ft H 9 Miles 11 Miles 13 Miles London City

Heathrow 4000ft 3000ft 2500ft H 9 Miles 11 Miles 13 Miles London City

Heathrow 4000ft 3000ft 2500ft H 9 Miles 11 Miles 13 Miles London City

2.5 Miles 120-140Kts 3 Miles 160 Kts Heathrow 4 DME 68 Sec 68 Sec

No Wind 4.5 Miles 5 Miles Heathrow 4 DME 113 Sec 113 Sec

Headwind Wind 5 6 Miles 5 Miles Heathrow 4 DME Pull Away situation causes loss of runway capacity

Tailwind Wind 4 Miles 5 Miles Heathrow 4 DME Catch up situation

Tailwind Wind 4.5 Miles 6 Miles Heathrow 4 DME Catch up situation requires extra spacing outside 4 DME

Tower Requirements And Responsibilities Check Separation provided on ATM Inform pilot if catch up more than half a mile Monitor separation below 500ft Monitor runway occupancy time Monitor landing clearance margins Consider variation between types Provide feedback to radar This is an interactive process

Tower Requirements And Responsibilities Go-arounds Typical go-around rates at Heathrow Of the order of 50 per month (1-2 per day) Normally only 1-2 per month due Wake Vortex Strategies to avoid go-arounds Approach and Tower controller interaction Radar aware of type and speed variations Inform pilot if catch up more than half a mile (visual) Visual switch Go-around Preservation of separation

Departure Separations Diverging routes 1 minute (or less using visual separation) Same Route 2 minutes (alternatively 5 miles radar separation) Wake Vortex 2 minutes (3 minutes when departing from an intersection)

Summary Segregated parallel runway operation Large numbers of queued pairs Small amount of airspace Holding enables Batching of wake categories Approach pattern and Continuous Descent Approaches creates wake hotspots where traffic patterns merge and at 3000ft-4000ft on final approach Maximum half a mile catch up permitted inside 4 DME Aircraft performance and wind effects taken into account Interactive process between Tower and Approach to ensure that separation is preserved

Any Questions?